Chemotherapy Research and PracticeVolume 2012 (2012), Article ID 858590, 7 pagesdoi:10.1155/2012/858590

Clinical Study

Bone Loss after Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Pilot Study on the Use of Zoledronic Acid

Andreas Hausmann,¹ Wolfgang Hill,¹ Hans Joachim Stemmler,¹ Georg Ledderose,² Andrea Baur-Melnyk,¹ Susanne Fritsch,¹ Johanna Ullmann,¹ Hans-Jochem Kolb,¹ Sandra Geiger,¹ and Johanna Tischer¹

¹Medical Department III, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Campus Großhadern, 81377 Munich, Germany²Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Campus Großhadern, 81377 Munich, Germany

Received 19 December 2011; Accepted 7 February 2012

Academic Editor: Piero Picci

Copyright © 2012 Andreas Hausmann et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Purpose. Bone loss is a common phenomenon following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The study aimed on tolerance and efficacy of zoledronic acid (ZA) in patients after allo-HSCT. Methods. 40 patients’ with osteoporosis or osteopenia were recruited on this phase II study. ZA was given at a dose of 4 mg IV every 3 months for 2 years (yrs). BMD was determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (LS lumbar spine, FH femur hip). Patients were evaluated for deoxypyridinoline (Dpd) and calcium excretion by longitudinal measurements. Results. 36 patients who had received at least 3 doses of ZA were evaluable. 26 patients had at least two BMD measurements since baseline (BMD group). Among these patients, BMD increased from to  g/cm² (LS baseline—2 yrs, %, ) and from to  g/cm² (FH baseline—2 yrs, %, ). Factors associated with an increase in BMD were younger age, female donor sex, and immunosuppression with CSA/MTX. Conclusion. ZA was generally well tolerated; it increases BMD and reduces Dpd excretion significantly in patients with bone loss after allo-HSCT.

1. Introduction

Bone loss is recognized as one of the most frequent complications in long-term survivors after allogeneic stem cell transplantation [1–4]. Data on the temporal sequence of bone loss in these patients are sparse [4–6]. Contrary to patients who underwent transplantation of a solid organ, these patients are exposed to numerous factors that may affect the skeletal system: induction and/or consolidation chemotherapy of the malignant hematologic disease, high-dose chemotherapy, malignancy-related changes in bone structure, total body irradiation (TBI) and consecutive hypogonadism, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), immunosuppressive treatments including corticosteroids and cyclosporine A (CSA), and immobilisation [1, 7–9].

Prospective studies of bone loss in patients after allo-HSCT are sparse, and cross-sectional studies revealed conflicting data. A positive correlation of bone loss was found for corticosteroid and CSA use, baseline BMD, and loss of muscle mass [5].

Oral bisphosphonates are widely used for treating osteoporosis and have been shown to improve BMD and decrease the rate of fractures in various patient populations [10]. However, the use of the oral formula is compromised by poor gastrointestinal tolerance. About half of patients after HSCT suffer from GvHD, with the gastrointestinal tract being one of the most frequent targets [11, 12]. Intravenous bisphosphonates have proven to be effective in patients with hemato-oncological malignancies. This includes a clinical benefit in reduction of bone pain, and reduction and/or delay of skeletal complications [13]. ZA has been evaluated in some small studies for efficacy and safety in patients after allo-HSCT; however, the majority of these studies covered a relatively short period of 12 months posttransplantation [14–17].

The present study aimed at investigating the 12- and 24-month effect of ZA administration on lumbar and femoral BMD and bone turnover markers. Moreover, these data were correlated to clinical features. Finally, we identified risk factors which were associated with significant bone loss in this setting.

2. Patients and Methods

The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Informed consent was given by the patient prior to study entry.

Forty patients after allo-HSCT were recruited on this prospective, monocentric phase II study between 2001 and 2006 at the Ludwig-Maximilians University Hospital of Munich.

The general aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerance of a 24-month interval therapy with ZA in patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis after allo-HSCT.

2.1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Eligibility criteria were as follows: signed informed consent, allogeneic HSCT within 4 years until inclusion, age ≥18 years, osteoporosis (T-score ≤−2.5 SD) or osteopenia (T-score −1.0 to −2.4), KPS ≥70%.

Exclusion criteria were relapsed underlying malignancy, and serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL, history of tooth extraction or surgery of the jaw during the last six months, prior bisphosphonate treatment, or women with hypogonadism without adequate hormone replacement therapy.

2.2. Primary and Secondary Objectives

The main variable was the mean percentage change of BMD of the lumbar spine (L1–L4) compared to baseline. Patients were screened for BMD by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA-Lunar prodigy). Secondary endpoints included BMD of total femur hip, parameters of bone modulation in serum and urine, for example, deoxypyridinoline (Dpd), and calcium excretion in urine by longitudinal measurements.

2.3. Therapy Performance

ZA was given at a dose of 4 mg IV every 3 months for 2 years (yrs) in combination with calcium (>500 mg/d), vitamin D₃ (>400 IE/d), and, in case of hypogonadism, hormone-replacement therapy.

2.4. Statistics

According to recent trials in patients with reduced BMD after allo-HSCT, the mean percentage annual bone increment will be estimated at 7.2% by a SEM of 0.49% and a standard deviation of 2.7%, respectively. To detect these changes by means of a paired t-test (two-sided) and an error probability of and a power of 80% (β error 0.2), a number of at least 4 patients was necessary. Due to planned statistical analyses in subgroups and a high drop-out rate of 20% because of high morbidity and mortality after allo-HSCT, an overall number of 40, including 25 evaluable patients, have been estimated. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Version 18 for Windows. Differences between baseline and 1-year and 2-year measurements were analyzed by paired t-test. A value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

Forty patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Baseline examination was median 15.6 months after allo-HSCT. 36 patients (24 male, 12 female; median age 43.8 yrs) who had received at least 3 doses of ZA were evaluable. None of them had fractures. 26 out of those patients had at least two BMD measurements since baseline (BMD group) (Figure 1). During the post-allo-HSCT period, patients had received different immunosuppressants: 24 patients had received cyclosporine A (CSA) and methothrexate (MTX), whereas one-third (12 patients) had received CSA and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Moreover, patients had received considerable doses of corticosteroids (prednisolone) with cumulative doses of 11.1 g prior to study entry and additional 5.4 g during the investigational phase. The duration of corticosteroid treatment was 152 days prior to study entry, and 628 days during the study. The majority (28 out of 36 patients) developed clinical signs of acute GvHD, which was mild in 5 patients (grade 1 or 2) and severe (grade 3 and 4) in 23 patients. Chronic GvHD was observed in 26 patients and was graded to a limited stage in 4 and to an extensive stage in 22 patients, respectively.

Figure 1: Study design and flowchart. *BMD and Dpd measurements = BMD group (by DXA).

Detailed information of baseline characteristics and type of allo-HSCT is given in Table 1.

Table 1: Patient characteristics prior to study entry.

All patients ()
BMD group ()

Baseline

Median age (yrs) at HSCT (range)
43.8 (18–64)
43.9 (18–64)

Gender (male/female)
24/12
18/8

Underlying disease

    AML
15
11

    CML
11
8

    ALL
5
4

    NHL
3
1

    MDS
2
2

Allo-HSCT

    Type of HSCT (BM/PBSCT/both)
16/16/4
12/10/4

    HLA (identical/different)
28/8
19/7

    Donor (related/unrelated)
19/17
15/11

    Donor sex (male/female)
18/18
12/14

    Cytoreduction prior to conditioning
11
9

    TBI (/4–8 Gy/10–12 Gy)
9/12/15
7/9/10

    Busulphan
9
7

    Cyclophosphamide
35
26

    ATG
32
23

    Immunosuppression

        CSA-MTX
24
18

        CSA-MMF
12
8

Post-allo-HSCT

    Acute/chronic GvHD
28/26
20/17

    Corticosteroids prior to study
29
20

        Duration (days) ± SD
152 ± 173
159 ± 198

        Cumulative dose (g) ± SD
11.1 ± 8.6
11.1 ± 9.1

    Corticosteroids during the study
29
20

        Duration (days) ± SD
628 ± 209
625 ± 121

        Cumulative dose (g) ± SD
5.4 ± 2.4
5.2 ± 1.6

3.2. BMD Measurements, T-Score

The baseline examination of BMD was median 15.6 months after allo-HSCT. 26 out of 36 patients had at least two BMD measurements since baseline (BMD group). Among these patients, BMD (mean ± SD) of the lumbar spine significantly increased from to  g/cm². BMD of the femur hip increased from to  g/cm² (Figure 2). The relative increment of BMD of the lumbar spine within 2 years ( BMD LS baseline—2 yrs) was % (). The corresponding relative increment of the femur hip ( BMD FH baseline—2 yrs) was % ().

(a) Lumbar spine: baseline 0.97 (±0.15), 1 year 1.04 (±0.18), 2 years 1.10 (±0.18)

(b) Femur hip: baseline 0.82 (±0.10), 1 year 0.87 (±0.11), 2 years 0.91 (±0.10)

Figure 2: BMD (mean ± SD; g/m²) of lumbar spine (a) and femur hip (b) after treatment with zoledronic acid.

T-scores (mean ± SD) of lumbar spine and femur hip increased significantly compared to baseline (). In detail, the T-score of the lumbar spine was −1.99 (±1.20) at baseline and increased to −1.41 (±1.49) at 1 year and to −0.85 (±1.48) at 2 years. The corresponding T-scores of femur hip was −1.88 (±0.83) at baseline, −1.53 (±0.86) at 1 year, and −1.18 (±0.70) at 2 years (Figure 3).

(a) Lumbar spine: baseline −1.99 (±1.20), 1 year −1.41 (±1.49), 2 years −0.85 (±1.48)

(b) Femur hip: baseline −1.88 (±0.83), 1 year −1.53 (±0.86), 2 years −1.18 (±0.70)

Figure 3: T-score (mean ± SD) of lumbar spine (a) and femur hip (b) after treatment with zoledronic acid.

The increase of BMD (mean ± SD) was significantly pronounced in younger patients (<45 yrs) than in older patients (BMD FH: % versus % at 1 yr, ; % versus % at 2 yrs, ). Another factor which was associated with a significant increase in BMD was female donor gender. The percentage increment of BMD of the femur hip at 1 year was % versus % (female versus male donor, ) and % versus % (female versus male donor, ), at 2 years, respectively. Finally, immunosuppression with CSA/MTX was associated with a significant increase in BMD. The percentage increment of BMD of the femur hip at 1 year was % versus % (CSA/MTX versus CSA/MMF, ) and % versus % (CSA/MTX versus CSA/MMF, ), at 2 years, respectively.

Other analyzed factors as corticosteroid therapy prior to or during the study, baseline BMD, and underlying malignancy prior to allo-HSCT were not significantly associated with changes of BMD.

Detailed information is given in Table 2.

Table 2: Percentual BMD increase (%) of femur hip-significant and nonsignificant parameters (BMD group ).

1 year
2 years

1 year
2 years

Age
<45 years
16
8.9
12.0
0.007
0.02

≥45 years
10
2.9
3.4

Donor gender
Female
14
7.6
10.2
0.04
0.05

Male
12
2.9
4.4

Immunosuppression
CSA/MTX
18
7.1
9.3
0.01
0.02

CSA/MMF
8
2.2
3.9

Gender
Male
18
6.5
8.6
—
—

Female
8
3.5
5.4
—
—

BMD
Osteopenia
13
5.5
7.8
—
—

Osteoporosis
13
9.6
7.8
—
—

Prior steroids
Yes
20
5.9
8.2
—
—

No
6
4.3
5.5
—
—

Steroids during study
Yes
20
5.3
8.8
—
—

No
6
5.6
7.2
—
—

Diagnosis
CML
8
5.5
6.7
—
—

AML
11
4.7
6.6
—
—

(—) Not significant.

3.3. Metabolic Parameters and Safety

36 patients had received at least 3 doses of ZA according to the study protocol (median 5 doses, range 3–8). Deoxypyridinoline (Dpd, nmol/nmol creatinine) decreased from to after 1 yr () and after 2 yrs (). There was no significant change of any other evaluated parameter (Table 3).

Table 3: Metabolic parameters (mean values), .

Baseline
1 year
2 years

Serum
Calcium (mmol/L)

Phosphate (mg/dL)

Creatinine (mg/dL)

Albumin (g/dL)

Urine
Ca (mmol/24 h)

Dpd* (nmol/nmol creatinine)

*
**

Estradiol (pg/mL)

FSH (IU/L)

LH (lU/L)

Vitamin D3
OH (ng/mL)

1,25 di-OH (pg/mL)

± SD: standard deviation; Dpd: deoxypyridinoline, *, **; °5/12 women had received hormone replacement therapy.

In general, ZA was well tolerated. One out of 40 patients was excluded after the first dose due to severe myalgia. Mild flu-like syndromes, bone pain, chest pain, or headache have been observed in 6 patients. None of the patients developed hypocalcaemia or increased creatinine serum levels (Table 3). None of the patients developed osteonecrosis of the jaw or fractures during the study interval.

4. Discussion

Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells is a widely accepted treatment option for various hematologic diseases. Despite constantly increasing survival rates, allo-HSCT is still associated with a considerably high morbidity and mortality. Therefore, long-term survivors after allo-HSCT are confronted with new problems if they develop chronic osteopenia or osteoporosis [5].

Factors which are associated with bone loss are age, hypogonadism, presence of GvHD and subsequent use of corticosteroids, and other immunosuppressants [2, 3, 8, 17].

Data from prospective studies of bone loss in patients after allo-HSCT are sparse. Moreover, these studies revealed conflicting data. Studies with an observational period of 3, respectively, 4 years, demonstrate a rapid bone loss within the first 6 months [18]. In the most recent study provided by Schulte and Beelen, the nadir of BMD was at 6 months for lumbar spine and at 24 months for femoral neck [5]. In the univariate analysis they found that only few factors contribute for the risk of rapid bone loss, namely, cumulative steroid dose and average steroid dose per day, average duration of exposure to CSA, and negative changes in muscle mass and high baseline BMD [5]. In the multivariate analysis, the effects of changes in body mass were highly exceeded by the steroid effect which confirms the muscle-catabolic effect of steroids. Other authors identified acute GvHD, myeloablative conditioning, and a higher dose of infused stem cells as a risk factor for rapid bone loss at 1 year after HSCT, whereas chronic GvHD and steroid use were both unfavourable prognostic factors in terms of osteopenia or osteoporosis at 2 years [17].

Bisphosphonates are widely accepted for the treatment of osteoporosis and osteopenia. They have proven to be effective to increase BMD and to decrease the rate of skeletal complications in a variety of patient populations [10]. There are data provided from 4 small studies which investigated the use of reabsorptive treatments (mostly zoledronic acid) for the prevention or treatment of bone loss after allogeneic HSCT [14–17]. Despite considerable numbers of included patients ( up to 60 patients), ZA was not applied to all of them ( up to 18 patients), and moreover, except one, the observational period within these trials was restricted to 12 months [14–17]. In all of these studies ZA increased significantly both lumbar and femoral BMD. Moreover, hydroxyproline excretion in urine decreased during the observational period [14, 15]. These findings seem to be consistent with the present study. BMD and T-score measurements significantly increased during the study period of 2 years and deoxypyridinoline levels decreased within this time. One can therefore conclude that ZA not only reduces bone loss after allo-HSCT, but rather increases BMD even though when patients are already compromised with osteoporosis or osteopenia.

The increase in BMD was evident throughout the whole study population and during the whole study period. Nevertheless, there were some striking differences in BMD increase within subgroups. The percentual increase in BMD was significantly higher in patients at a younger age, in patients whose donor was a female and who had received immunosuppression with CSA/MTX. The latter may be speculatively explained by the finding that MMF is associated with hypocalcaemia and hypomagnesaemia in approximately 30%. But this had never been evaluated in a study.

In contrast to previous studies of Chae et al., and Schulte and Beelen, our data have not confirmed an influence of corticosteroid treatment on BMD increment [5, 17]. One explanation for this finding is that the subgroups were too small to detect such a difference. Analyzing those who had received steroids prior to study entry, one can suggest a trend towards an increased BMD during treatment with ZA (+8.2% previous steroids versus +5.5% no prior steroids).

Certainly, there are limitations of the present study consisting of a low study number, loss of patients who had undergone BMD measurements according to the study protocol (26 out of 36 patients), inclusion of patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis, and, moreover, limitations consisting of the heterogeneity of an allotransplant patient population (e.g., underlying disease, conditioning protocol, TBI). All these transplantation-associated factors certainly contribute to the presented results.

Multiple factors contribute to bone loss after allo-HSCT. Long-term survivors are confronted with severe problems, if they develop osteopenia- or osteoporosis-related complications as chronic pain and/or fractures. In summary, ZA was found to be effective not only to prevent but also to treat evident bone loss in the femoral hip and spine of patients after allo-HSCT. Thus, patients who are at a high risk for bone loss should be monitored carefully and should be considered to use ZA to prevent and to treat bone loss and skeletal events. However, the optimal time of initiation and duration requires further studies.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgment

The study was supported by Novartis Pharma GmbH, Germany.

References

I. A. Katz and S. Epstein, “Perspectives: posttransplantation bone disease,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 123–126, 1992.

A. D. Schimmer, M. D. Minden, and A. Keating, “Osteoporosis after blood and marrow transplantation: clinical aspects,” Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, vol. 6, no. 2 A, pp. 175–181, 2000.

J. M. Stern, K. M. Sullivan, S. M. Ott et al., “Bone density loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a prospective study,” Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 257–264, 2001.

M. K. Gandhi, S. Lekamwasam, I. Inman et al., “Significant and persistent loss of bone mineral density in the femoral neck after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: long-term follow-up of a prospective study,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 462–468, 2003.

C. M. S. Schulte and D. W. Beelen, “Bone loss following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a long-term follow-up,” Blood, vol. 103, no. 10, pp. 3635–3643, 2004.

P. R. Ebeling, D. M. Thomas, B. Erbas, J. L. Hopper, J. Szer, and A. P. Grigg, “Mechanisms of bone loss following allogeneic and autologous hemopoietic stem cell transplantation,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 342–350, 1999.

C. Carlo-Stella, A. Tabilio, E. Regazzi et al., “Effect of chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia on hematopoietic and fibroblast marrow progenitors,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 465–471, 1997.

A. Banfi, M. Podestà, L. Fazzuoli et al., “High-dose chemotherapy shows a dose-dependent toxicity to bone marrow osteoprogenitors: a mechanism for post-bone marrow transplantation osteopenia,” Cancer, vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 2419–2428, 2001.

S. Takahashi, M. Sugimoto, Y. Kotoura, K. Sasai, M. Oka, and T. Yamamuro, “Long-term changes in the haversian systems following high-dose irradiation: an ultrastructural and quantitative histomorphological study,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 722–738, 1994.

P. D. Delmas, F. Munoz, D. M. Black et al., “Effects of yearly zoledronic acid 5 mg on bone turnover markers and relation of PINP with fracture reduction in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1544–1551, 2009.

L. H. Wang, H. Y. Ren, and Z. X. Qiu, “Analysis of clinically diagnosed upper gastrointestinal GVHD and effect of small-dose corticosteroid therapy after related hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,” Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 118–119, 2011.

C. Castilla, J. A. Perez-Simon, F. M. Sanchez-Guijo, et al., “Oral beclomethasone dipropionate for the treatment of gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD),” Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 936–941, 2006.

A. Lipton, E. Small, F. Saad et al., “The new bisphosphonate, Zometa® (zoledronic acid), decreases skeletal complications in both osteolytic and osteoblastic lesions: a comparison to pamidronate,” Cancer Investigation, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 45–54, 2002.

L. Tauchmanovà, P. Ricci, B. Serio et al., “Short-term zoledronic acid treatment increases bone mineral density and marrow clonogenic fibroblast progenitors after allogeneic stem cell transplantation,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 627–634, 2005.

L. Tauchmanovà, G. De Simone, T. Musella et al., “Effects of various antireabsorptive treatments on bone mineral density in hypogonadal young women after allogeneic stem cell transplantation,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 81–88, 2006.

A. B. D'Souza, A. P. Grigg, J. Szer, and P. R. Ebeling, “Zoledronic acid prevents bone loss after allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation,” Internal Medicine Journal, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 600–603, 2006.

Y. S. Chae, J. G. Kim, J. H. Moon et al., “Pilot study on the use of zoledronic acid to prevent bone loss in allo-SCT recipients,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2009.

W. Y. Lee, M. I. Kang, K. H. Baek et al., “The skeletal site-differential changes in bone mineral density following bone marrow transplantation: 3-year prospective study,” Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 749–754, 2002.