Conference Papers in Medicine

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 586769, 4 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/586769

Conference Paper

Complete Responses after Hyperthermic Ablation by Ultrasound Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Plus Systemic Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Joan Vidal-Jove,¹ Marta Garcia-Bernal,² Eloi Perich,¹ and Manuel Alvarez del Castillo³

¹Surgical Oncology HIFU Unit, Hospital Universitari Mutua Terrassa (HUMT), Placa Dr. Robert 5, 08221 Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain

²Pediatric Department, Hospital Universitari Mutua Terrassa (HUMT), Placa Dr. Robert 5, 08221 Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain

³Medical Direction Department, Hospital Universitari Mutua Terrassa (HUMT), Placa Dr. Robert 5, 08221 Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain

Received 14 January 2013; Accepted 3 April 2013

Academic Editors: G. F. Baronzio, M. Jackson, D. Lee, and A. Szasz

This Conference Paper is based on a presentation given by Joan Vidal-Jove at “Conference of the International Clinical Hyperthermia Society 2012” held from 12 October 2012 to 14 October 2012 in Budapest, Hungary.

Copyright © 2013 Joan Vidal-Jove et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

We describe results in unresectable pancreatic tumors treated with USgHIFU hyperthermia ablation plus adjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and Methods. Thirty two cases of nonresectable pancreatic tumors were treated from March 2010 to March 2012, and all of them underwent systemic chemotherapy. Clinical responses (thermal ablation achieved) were measured by image techniques. There were 23 stage III cases and 9 stage IV cases. Complications were also analyzed. Results. Clinical responses (ablation obtained) were 82% in all cases, sustained at 8 weeks of the procedure. We obtained 8 complete responses (25%) at the end of the combined treatment, 7 from stage III patients and 1 from stage IV. Major complications included (1) severe pancreatitis with GI bleeding and (2) skin burning grade III that required plastic surgery. No deaths were registered. Median survival was 12.5 month (6 months–2.5 year). Conclusion. HIFU plus SC is a potentially effective and safe modality for the treatment of unresectable pancreatic cancer.

1. Introduction

Despite continuous scientific advances in the field of oncology, pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis nowadays. A significant part of cases is considered unresectable at diagnosis due to late detection of the disease or to invasion of great vessels surrounding the tumor [1]. Therefore, treatments with chemotherapy and in lesser grade radiotherapy are the only tools suitable to be offered to the patients with locally advanced disease [2]. Overall survival is around 6–10 months in stage III patients and only 3–6 months for stage IV cases [1].

US-guided HIFU is a feasible technique with no mortality, low morbidity, and promising results (Figure 1). At present, there are several ablation techniques employed to treat tumors in different locations. Radiofrequency, cryotherapy, ethanol injection, or embolisation are considered for tumors in several locations except pancreas tumors. At present, there is no ablative technique suitable for pancreatic lesions. High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a minimally invasive surgical technique that has proven to improve the local control in different types of tumors. Several studies in animals and humans have shown the efficacy of this technique to cause a coagulative necrosis that able to diminish or even ablate tumoral masses. Previous reports of the treatment of pancreatic masses by HIFU have been published recently, specially underlining its role as a good concomitant treatment associated to gemcitabine based chemotherapy protocols.

Figure 1: The US-guided HIFU device JC 200.

The HIFU Unit in Hospital Universitari Mutua Terrassa was established in 2008. First cases were exclusively uterine fibroid tumors. Since January 2010, a wide variety of malignant tumors had been treated at our institution.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate retrospectively the results of HIFU treatment in a group of advanced pancreatic cancer patients managed in our center.

2. Material and Methods

From March 2010 to March 2012, thirty-two cases of nonresectable pancreatic tumors due to locally advanced disease were treated with HIFU in our institution. Most patients were referred from the oncology or surgery departments of different Spanish hospitals, although three of them came from other European institutions. All of them had a pathology confirmed diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and underwent systemic chemotherapy with a gemcitabine based combination prior to HIFU treatment (Figure 2). The HIFU device at this unit is ultrasound guided JC 200 device from HAIFU Chongqing (China).

Figure 2: Pancreas cancer clinical pathway.

Patient’s ages ranged from 32 to 79 years old ().

They were 23 locally advanced stage III cases and 9 metastatic stage IV cases, according to TNM international classification.

HIFU treatment was administered at least 4 weeks after chemotherapy was discontinued. Previous Doppler color ultrasound was obtained, and simulation procedure was performed in all cases. Two cases were excluded from the initial selection because the ultrasound image was not able to obtain a good identification of the tumoral mass, and therefore treatment was not performed.

All patients were treated under general anesthesia to manage the procedure-associated pain and to obtain a better control of the respiration movements during treatment. Procedures last between 2 and 4 hours, and time to exposure to HIFU lays between 1500 and 3000 seconds.

In thirty patients, HIFU treatment was performed only once, but in two cases the procedure was repeated 2 months later to ablate the remaining tumor. The median intensity of treatment was 350 Watts, which corresponds to a median temperature of 70 degrees Celsius.

Clinical responses (thermal ablation achieved of the pancreatic tumor) were measured at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks by CT Scans, MRI, and PET image techniques, all of them available at our hospital. Response was considered positive if an ablation of more than 60% of the tumoral mass was achieved. Two experienced radiologists reviewed results (Figures 3 and 4). Patients with poor hematologic conditions, previous radiotherapy treatment, or poor Karnofsky index (lower than 60) were excluded.

Figure 3: CT scan of tumor ablated in pancreas body preserving superior mesenteric artery.

Figure 4: PET scan of Figure 3 case showing complete response on the tumor site.

Responses obtained were measured under RECIST criteria. The complications were also analyzed.

3. Results

Clinical responses in terms of ablation obtained were 82% in all cases, confirmed and sustained at 8 weeks after the procedure. We obtained 8 complete responses (25%) at the end of the combined treatment of HIFU plus systemic chemotherapy, 7 from stage III patients and 1 from stage IV.

Median followup is 12.5 months (6–32 months). The longest survival since treatment is 2.5 year. At the time of this writing, twenty-two patients had died, and ten were alive. The overall median survival time was 12.5 months (range, 6–30 months). Patients died as a result of cachexia, hepatic dysfunction caused by liver metastases untreated with high-intensity focused ultrasound, peritoneal carcinomatosis, or other systemic progression of the disease.

Major complications were registered including severe pancreatitis with GI bleeding (one case), skin burning grade III that required plastic surgery (2 cases). No deaths were registered due to the procedure. None of the patients needed emergency surgical procedures due to complications. During the hospital stay, no signs of tumor hemorrhage, large blood vessel rupture, or gastrointestinal perforation were detected in any patient. There was no evidence of peritonitis or jaundice in any patient during the immediate postinterventional period. No dilatation of the common bile duct or pancreatic duct was visible at follow-up imaging.

4. Discussion

Recently, several papers have emphasized the use of HIFU for pancreas tumors [3–6]. Anatomical locations of these types of lesions preclude the use of radiofrequency, cryotherapy, ethanol injection, or embolisation procedures but allow the treatment with HIFU. In our study, the high percentage of responses obtained in terms of meaningful ablation achieved (82%) confirms this assumption.

Hyperthermic ablation techniques role in cancer patients need to be defined. The increased prevalence of pancreatic tumors as well as the better results obtained with the combination of chemotherapy plus best supportive care of these patients raises the issue of cytoreductive treatments addressed to control locoregional progression of the disease. Ablation techniques in those cases, and HIFU among all of them, may play an interesting role, supported by their results and low morbidity obtained. In our study, no significative morbidity was added to decrease the quality of life on our patients. Longer survival compared with the statistics reported in the literature reinforces our tumor ablation program with HIFU.

HIFU ablation techniques may be considered in tumors where surgery does not arrive (Figure 5). There is a subgroup of patients that can be specially benefited with HIFU ablation techniques [7]. Patients with stage III tumors due to minimal vascular invasion that are not candidates to surgical resection may become free of disease after HIFU ablation. In our results, 7 patients from our group of stage III patients achieved a complete response, 4 of them still alive at the writing of this article.

Figure 5: CT scan of tumor ablated in pancreas body above celiac trunk.

There is a clear need for multicentric studies development. Reporting methodology of the ablation obtained and assessment and duration of response remain as controversial issues that need to be clarified in the coming studies. There are difficulties to analyze percentage of response with tumors in the pancreas head. PET scans are still difficult to evaluate when SUV is in its limits. In those cases, inflammation and tumor recurrence are not clearly distinguished.

Because 90% of the patients with pancreas tumors are diagnosed with regional or distant disease and do not have effective modalities of treatment, we are very encouraged with the results of our experience. We suggest that HIFU is a feasible, safe, and effective technique to control local disease in stage III pancreas tumors and that it needs to be tested in randomized clinical trials.

References

R. Siegel, D. Naishadham, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 10–29, 2012.

D. Cunningham, I. Chau, D. D. Stocken et al., “Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 27, no. 33, pp. 5513–5518, 2009.

F. Wu, Z.-B. Wang, H. Zhu et al., “Feasibility of US-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: initial experience,” Radiology, vol. 236, no. 3, pp. 1034–1040, 2005.

J. Y. Lee, B. I. Choi, J. K. Ryu et al., “Concurrent chemotherapy and pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for the treatment of unresectable pancreatic cancer: initial experiences,” Korean Journal of Radiology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 176–186, 2011.

T. Khokhlova and J. Hwang, “HIFU for palliative treatment of pancreatic cancer,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 175–184, 2011.

H. Zhao, G. Yang, D. Wang et al., “Concurrent gemcitabine and high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer,” Anti-Cancer Drugs, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 447–452, 2010.

F. Orsi, L. Zhang, P. Arnone et al., “High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation: effective and safe therapy for solid tumors in difficult locations,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 195, no. 3, pp. W245–W252, 2010.