Journal of Nanoparticles

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 780786, 6 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/780786

Research Article

Ecofriendly and Facile One-Pot Multicomponent Synthesis of Thiopyrimidines under Microwave Irradiation

Biswa Mohan Sahoo,¹ B. V. V. Ravi Kumar,¹ Jnyanaranjan Panda,¹ and S. C. Dinda²

¹Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Roland Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khodasingi, Berhampur 760 010, India

²School of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Berhampur University, Berhampur 760 007, Odisha, India

Received 31 December 2012; Revised 20 February 2013; Accepted 25 February 2013

Academic Editor: Alexander Kauffmann

Copyright © 2013 Biswa Mohan Sahoo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

A rapid, improved, and ecofriendly synthesis of thiopyrimidines is carried out via one-pot multicomponent reaction of ethylcyanoacetate, substituted benzaldehydes, and thiourea in presence of ethanolic K₂CO₃ using microwave irradiation heating method. Excellent yields, shorter reaction time, and easy workup are the major advantageous features of this green protocol. So the application of multicomponent reactions involves the combination of multiple starting materials with different functional groups leading to the highly efficient and environmentally friendly construction of multifunctional drug molecules. The structures of the newly synthesized products were assigned on the basis of IR and ¹HNMR spectral data.

1. Introduction

One-pot multicomponent organic reactions (MCORs) have emerged as an efficient tool for benign synthesis by virtue of their convergence, productivity, facile execution, and generation of highly diverse and complex products from easily available starting materials in a single operation. MCORs are now being tuned for synthesizing various heterocyclic compounds due to their diverse biological activities [1]. The environmental acceptability of the process is improved if the multicomponent strategy is applied under microwave irradiation (MWI) technology [2]. For an organic synthesis, a major adverse effect on the environment is the consumption of energy for heating. To overcome this problem, it is highly desirable to develop suitable methods of heating that use microwave irradiation. So, the synthetic methodologies nowadays should be designed in such a way to use and generate substances that possess little or no toxicity to human health and the environment. Microwave heating provides a valuable tool to perform reactions faster with enhanced product yields with high purity by reducing unwanted formation of byproducts [3]. From an environmental and economic perspective, it is becoming obvious that the traditional methods of performing chemical synthesis are unsustainable and have to be changed. Multicomponent coupling reactions provide a solution since they are more efficient, cost effective, and less wasteful than traditional methods. The achievement of making multiple bonds in a one-pot multicomponent coupling reaction promotes a sustainable synthetic approach to develop new drug molecule in a drug discovery process.

Microwave (MW) irradiation facilitates better thermal management of chemical reactions. The rapid MW heat transfer allows reactions to be carried out very much faster compared to conventional heating methods often resulting in increased product yield [4, 5]. Furthermore, the products of temperature sensitive reactions from kinetic or thermodynamic pathways can be selectively tuned and isolated. The fundamental mechanism of microwave irradiated synthesis involves agitation of polar molecules or ions that oscillate under the effect of an oscillating electric or magnetic field. In the presence of an oscillating field, particles try to orient themselves or be in phase with the field. Only materials that absorb microwave radiation are relevant to microwave synthesis [6, 7].

These materials can be categorized according to the three main mechanisms of heating such as dipolar polarization, conduction, and interfacial polarization. In the electromagnetic spectrum, the microwave radiation region is located between infrared radiation and radiowaves. Microwaves have wavelengths of , which corresponds to the frequencies between 0.3 and 300 GHz [8, 9]. Microwave radiation is introduced into the reaction system remotely without direct physical contact with reaction materials, which can lead to a rapid increase in temperature throughout the sample causing less byproducts formation or decomposition of products. Microwave heating is able to heat the target compounds without heating the entire furnace or oil bath, which saves time and energy. In contrast, conventional heating of organic reactions such as oil baths, sand baths, or heating mantles is rather slow and creates an inward temperature gradient, which may result in localized overheating and reagent decomposition when heated for prolonged periods. In conventional heating method, the wall of reactor is heated by convection or conduction. The microwave-assisted organic synthesis has been classified into various categories such as microwave-assisted reactions using solvents, microwave-assisted reactions under solvent-free conditions, microwave-assisted reactions using solid-liquid phase, and microwave-assisted reactions on mineral supports in dry media [10, 11].

Since the multicomponent reactions often create the complete and complex molecular products in a single synthetic step, it is more accepted to describe this modern synthetic procedure as microwave multicomponent synthesis (MMS) [12, 13]. The experimental benefits of generating complex structures from the simple starting materials without engaging protection-deprotection protocols and lengthy product purification procedures improve the synthetic approach for medicinal chemist wishing to contribute products to a more scientifically innovative society [14]. The previous facts prompted us to synthesize thiopyrimidines via one-pot multicomponent reaction of ethylcyanoacetate, substituted benzaldehydes, and thiourea in presence of ethanolic K₂CO₃ using microwave irradiation heating method [15–18]. Generally the one-pot multicomponent synthesis of thiopyrimidines follows the principle of Biginelli reaction protocol [19, 20].

2. Experimental Method

2.1. Materials

The melting points were taken in open capillaries and are uncorrected. The purity of the compounds was checked by TLC on precoated silica gel-aluminum plates and visualized by exposure to UV light (254 nm) or iodine vapor. The IR spectra of the compounds were recorded on FT-IR Spectrophotometer, IR Affinity-1 (SHIMADZU), using potassium bromide (KBr) powder and the values are expressed in cm⁻¹. ¹H-NMR spectra of selected compounds were recorded on multinuclear FT-NMR Spectrometer, Advance-II (Bruker) (at 400 MHz), using tetramethylsilane [Si(CH₃)₄] as an internal standard. The microwave irradiated synthesis was performed in scientific microwave oven (Catalyst System, Model No-CATA 2R). All the reactions were carried out at power level-2, which corresponds to 210 W.

2.2. Chemistry

Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) constitute a highly valuable synthetic tool for the construction of polyfunctionalized heterocyclic compounds. Thus, a series of thiopyrimidine derivatives was synthesized based on multicomponent reaction (MCR) which involves one-pot organic reactions [21, 22]. This reaction involves two mechanisms such as Knoevenagel condensation and Michael addition. First various substituted benzaldehydes (RC₆H₄CHO) react with ethylcyanoacetate (NCCH₂COOC₂H₅) in presence of ethanolic K₂CO₃ to produce an intermediate by Knoevenagel condensation reaction. Then the intermediate reacts with thiourea [SC(NH₂)₂] via Michael addition to produce thiopyrimidines as depicted in Scheme 1.

Scheme 1: Synthetic route of the titled compounds 4(a–g).

2.3. Synthesis of Thiopyrimidines

2.3.1. Conventional Method

A mixture of appropriate substituted benzaldehydes (RC₆H₄CHO) (0.03 mole), ethylcyanoacetate (NCCH₂COOC₂H₅) (0.03 mole, 3.39 g), and thiourea [SC(NH₂)₂] (0.03 mole, 2.28 g) in ethanol (C₂H₅OH) (25 mL) containing potassium carbonate (K₂CO₃) (0.03 mole, 4.15 g) was taken and refluxed for 4–8 h on a water bath. The completion of reaction was monitored by TLC. The potassium salt of compound 4(a–g), which precipitated during the reaction, was poured into cold water and acidified with glacial acetic acid (CH₃COOH). The precipitate was filtered out, dried, and recrystallized from ethanol (C₂H₅OH).

2.3.2. Microwave-assisted Method

Required quantity of reactants and catalysts as mentioned previously was taken and refluxed under microwave irradiation for 5–10 min at power level-2 (210 W). The completion of reaction was monitored by TLC. The potassium salt of compound 4(a–g), which precipitated during the reaction, was poured into cold water and acidified with glacial acetic acid (CH₃COOH). The precipitate was filtered out, dried, and recrystallized from ethanol.

3. Results and Discussion

In the present study, thiopyrimidine derivatives were synthesized by both conventional and microwave techniques. As compared to conventional method, microwave synthesis provides higher yield in lesser reaction time. From the results as summarized in Table 1, it can be observed that in case of conventional method of heating, the reactants are slowly activated by a conventional external heating source (water bath). Heat is driven into the reacting substances, passing first through the walls of the vessel in order to reach the solvent and the reactants. So, this is a slow method for transferring heat energy into the reaction medium. Hence, for the synthesis of the titled compounds of present work, which takes 4–8 h to complete the reaction. While considering microwave synthesis, microwaves couple directly with the reacting molecules of reaction mixture, leading to a rapid rise in the temperature. Since this process is not limited by the thermal conductivity of the vessel, the result is an instantaneous localized superheating of reacting substances that will respond to either dipole rotation or ionic conduction. Since the ability of a molecule to couple with the microwave radiation is a function of its molecular polarisability (i.e., a function of its dipole moment), only polar molecules interact with microwave energy. As a part of ongoing research of developing environmentally benign synthesis of thiopyrimidine derivatives, we explored a green multicomponent reaction (MCR) protocol using ethanol as solvent. Three component reactions such as the Biginelli reaction with ethylcyanoacetate, substituted benzaldehydes, and thiourea are well-known microwave-induced reactions (MW). Here an attempt was also made to carry out the synthesis of thiopyrimidine by microwave at power level-1 (140 W) but this energy was not sufficient to complete the reaction for getting final product. For the investigation of the optimized reaction condition, it was observed that the synthesis of target compounds by microwave required 5–10 min at power level-2 which corresponds to the energy of 210 W. The photograph of microwave irradiated synthesis of titled compounds was given in Figure 1. During synthesis, thin layer chromatographic (TLC) study was carried out to monitor the completion of reaction using chloroform : ethyl acetate (60 : 40) as the mobile phase. The retention factor () of the synthesized compounds was in the range of 0.32–0.51. The melting points of the synthesized compounds were also checked and the results were given in Table 2. All the synthesized compounds are solid, white, crystalline, or amorphous. The photographs of some of the synthesized compounds were given in Figure 2. Most of the compounds are freely soluble in CH₃OH, C₂H₅OH, CH₂Cl₂, (CH₃)₂SO, (CH₃)₂NC(O)H. The compounds were analyzed by IR and ¹H-NMR spectra. All the compounds showed an IR absorption band at a region 3410–3525 cm⁻¹ which corresponds to the asymmetric stretching of 2⁰ –NH group. They also showed the IR absorption band in the regions of 3150–3030 cm⁻¹, 2235–2198 cm⁻¹, 1795–1693 cm⁻¹, 1640–1590 cm⁻¹, 1450–1530 cm⁻¹, and 1380–1270 cm⁻¹ for different groups like (Ar–H Str.), (CN Str.), (C=O Str.), (C=C Str.), (Sec. N–H def.), and (C–N str.) vibration, respectively. The halogenated derivatives showed the IR absorption bands in the regions 900–1100 cm⁻¹, 755–780 cm⁻¹, and 495–585 cm⁻¹ corresponds to (C–F str.), and (C–Cl str.), (C–Br str.) vibrations respectively. The IR absorption band in the region 1230–1255 cm⁻¹ which corresponds to the C=S str. vibration. The ¹H-NMR spectra showed two singlets in the range δ 8.00–8.30 ppm due to –NH proton. They also showed the signals at δ 7.46–7.91 ppm due to aromatic proton (Ar–H).

Table 1: Comparative data on reaction time, heating energy, and yield of compounds 4(a–g) by conventional and microwave assisted synthesis.

Compound code
Conventional synthesis
Microwave synthesis

Time (h)
Energy (temp. °C)
Yield (%)
Time (min.)
Energy (power. watt)
Yield (%)

4a
4
98–100
66
5
210
85

4b
6
98–100
65
10
210
85

4c
5
98–100
62
7
210
82

4d
8
98–100
60
9
210
79

4e
6
98–100
61
6
210
82

4f
7
98–100
55
8
210
78

4g
6
98–100
59
7
210
80

Table 2: Melting point and TLC report of synthesized compounds 4(a–g).

Comp. code
R
M.F
M.W.
mp (°C)

4a
H
C₁₁H₇N₃OS
229.25
285–287
0.36

4b
–4F
C₁₁H₆FN₃OS
247.24
195–197
0.37

4c
–2Cl
C₁₁H₆ClN₃OS
263.70
185–187
0.51

4d
–3Cl
C₁₁H₆ClN₃OS
263.70
275-276
0.37

4e
–4Cl
C₁₁H₆ClN₃OS
263.70
205–207
0.32

4f
–3Br
C₁₁H₆BrN₃OS
308.15
250–252
0.35

4g
–4Br
C₁₁H₆BrN₃OS
308.15
242–244
0.40

(a)

(b)

Figure 1: Photographs displaying microwave irradiated synthesis of titled compounds.

(a) Compound 4a

(b) Compound 4b

(c) Compound 4d

(d) Compound 4e

(e) Compound 4f

(f) Compound 4g

Figure 2: Photographs displaying some of the synthesized compounds by microwave irradiation method.

4. Conclusion

A new series of thiopyrimidine derivatives was synthesized successfully by both conventional and microwave irradiated methods to compare the reaction time and yield of the compounds. With the help of microwave synthesis, the yield of product increased from 55% up to 85% as compared to conventional synthesis. And also the reaction time is reduced from 4–8 h to 5–10 min. Microwave synthesis reduced the formation of waste and byproduct. This is particularly relevant for high energy heterocyclic reactions. The predominant use of protic solvents leads to quicker, greener, and therefore more environmentally friendlyr reaction. The application of MW irradiation technology in MMS significantly enhanced the synthetic yield of thiopyrimidine obtained by consecutive Knoevenagel and Michael addition reactions performed on a mixture of substituted benzaldehydes, ethylcyanoacetate, and thiourea. MCRs have been proved as simple and convenient ways to produce a plethora of physiologically active thiopyrimidines. The strategy of MCR has been developed to enable the rapid construction of diverse structures from starting materials in a single operation. Multicomponent reactions are economically and environmentally very advantageous because multistep syntheses produce considerable amounts of waste mainly due to complex isolation procedures often involving expensive, toxic, and hazardous solvents after each step. Thus, MCRs are suited for synthesis of compound libraries and are considered as an important tool during the developmental process of new drugs.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very much thankful to Roland Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Berhampur, and School of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Berhampur University, Odisha, for providing necessary facilities to carry out the research work. The authors are also thankful to SAIF, Panjab University Chandigarh, for spectral analysis of synthesized compounds.

References

M. C. Bagley and M. C. Lubinu, “Microwave-assisted multicomponent reactions for the synthesis of heterocycles,” Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry, vol. 1, pp. 31–58, 2006.

S. Ravichandran and E. Karthikeyan, “Microwave synthesis—a potential tool for green chemistry,” International Journal of ChemTech Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 466–470, 2011.

M. Charde, A. Shukla, V. Bukhariya, J. Mehta, and R. Chakole, “A review on: a significance of microwave assist technique in green chemistry,” International Journal of Phytopharmacy, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 39–50, 2012.

B. S. Sekhon, “Microwave-assisted pharmaceutical synthesis: an overview,” International Journal of PharmTech Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 827–833, 2010.

M. A. Surati, S. Jauhari, and K. R. Desai, “A brief review: microwave assisted organic reaction,” Archives of Applied Science Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 645–661, 2012.

P. Lidström, J. Tierney, B. Wathey, and J. Westman, “Microwave assisted organic synthesis—a review,” Tetrahedron, vol. 57, no. 45, pp. 9225–9283, 2001.

A. Loupy, Microwaves in Organic Synthesis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2006.

C. O. Kappe, “Controlled microwave heating in modern organic synthesis,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 43, no. 46, pp. 6250–6284, 2004.

F. R. Alexandre, L. Domon, S. Frère, A. Testard, V. Thiéry, and T. Besson, “Microwaves in drug discovery and multi-step synthesis,” Molecular Diversity, vol. 7, no. 2–4, pp. 273–280, 2003.

S. Caddick and R. Fitzmaurice, “Microwave enhanced synthesis,” Tetrahedron, vol. 65, no. 17, pp. 3325–3355, 2009.

A. Madhvi, S. J. Surati, and K. R. Desai, “A brief review: microwave assisted organic reaction,” Archives of Applied Science Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 645–661, 2012.

H. M. Hügel, “Microwave multicomponent synthesis,” Molecules, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 4936–4972, 2009.

J. L. Krstenansky and L. Cotterill, “Recent advances in microwave-assisted organic syntheses,” Current Opinion in Drug Discovery and Development, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 454–461, 2000.

M. Borisagar, K. Joshi, H. Ram, K. Vyas, and K. Nimavat, “A one-pot microwave irradiation synthesis of 1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-A]pyrimidines,” Acta Chimica & Pharmaceutica Indica, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 101–105, 2012.

A. Kruithof, E. Ruijter, and V. A. Orru, “Microwave-assisted multicomponent synthesis of heterocycles,” Current Organic Chemistry, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 204–236, 2011.

S. J. Vaghasia and V. H. Shah, “Microwave assisted synthesis and antimicrobial activity of some novel pyrimidine derivatives,” Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 109–117, 2007.

J. M. Gajera and S. N. Tondlekar, “A novel and one-pot synthesis of 6-arylpyrimidin-4-ol,” Research Letters in Organic Chemistry, pp. 1–3, 2008.

N. Agarwal, P. Srivastava, S. K. Raghuwanshi et al., “Chloropyrimidines as a new class of antimicrobial agents,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 869–874, 2002.

K. Singh, K. Singh, B. Wan, S. Franzblau, K. Chibale, and J. Balzarini, “Facile transformation of Biginelli pyrimidin-2(1H)-ones to pyrimidines. In vitro evaluation as inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and modulators of cytostatic activity,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 2290–2294, 2011.

C. O. Kappe, “A reexamination of the mechanism of the Biginelli dihydropyrimidine synthesis. Support for an N-acyliminium ion intermediate,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 62, no. 21, pp. 7201–7204, 1997.

M. Kidwai, K. Singhal, and S. Kukreja, “One-pot green synthesis for pyrimido[4,5-d]pyrimidine derivatives,” Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 732–736, 2007.

A. H. Kategaonkar, S. A. Sadaphal, K. F. Shelke, B. B. Shingate, and M. S. Shingare, “Microwave assisted synthesis of pyrimido[4,5-d]pyrimidine derivatives in dry media,” Ukrainica Bioorganica Acta, vol. 1, pp. 3–7, 2009.