International Scholarly Research Notices
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 358439, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/358439

Research Article

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Weighted Linear Regression Model with Fuzzy Entropy under Linear Restrictions

Gaurav Kumar¹ and Rakesh Kumar Bajaj²

¹Singhania University, Pacheri Bari, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan 333515, India
²Jaypee University of Information Technology, Waknaghat 173234, India

Received 18 April 2014; Revised 6 August 2014; Accepted 23 August 2014; Published 30 October 2014

Academic Editor: Bijan Davvaz

Copyright © 2014 Gaurav Kumar and Rakesh Kumar Bajaj. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

In fuzzy set theory, it is well known that a triangular fuzzy number can be uniquely determined through its position and entropies. In the present communication, we extend this concept on triangular intuitionistic fuzzy number for its one-to-one correspondence with its position and entropies. Using the concept of fuzzy entropy the estimators of the intuitionistic fuzzy regression coefficients have been estimated in the unrestricted regression model. An intuitionistic fuzzy weighted linear regression (IFWLR) model with some restrictions in the form of prior information has been considered. Further, the estimators of regression coefficients have been obtained with the help of fuzzy entropy for the restricted/unrestricted IFWLR model by assigning some weights in the distance function.

1. Introduction

In statistical analysis, regression is used to explore the relationship between input variables (also known as independent variables or explanatory variables) and the output variable (also called dependent variable or response variable) from sets of observations. In linear regression, the method of least-squares is applied to find the regression coefficients , , which describe the contribution of the corresponding independent variable in explaining the dependent variable . The aim of regression analysis is to estimate the parameters on the basis of available/observed empirical data. Traditional studies on regression assume the observations to have crisp values. In the crisp linear regression model, the parameters (regression coefficients are crisp) appear in a linear form; that is,

Once the coefficients are determined from the observed samples, the responses are estimated from any given sets of values.

Fuzzy set theory, developed by Zadeh [1], has capability to describe the uncertain situations, containing ambiguity and vagueness. It may be recalled that a fuzzy set defined on a universe of discourse is characterized by a membership function which takes values in the interval (i.e., ). The value represents the grade of membership of in . This grade corresponds to the degree to which that element or individual is similar or compatible with the concept represented by the fuzzy set. Thus, the elements may belong in the fuzzy set to a greater or lesser degree as indicated by a larger or smaller membership grade.

Tanaka et al. [2, 3] initiated the research in the area of linear regression analysis in a fuzzy environment, where a fuzzy linear system is used as a regression model. They consider a regression model in which the relations of the variables are subject to fuzziness, that is, the model with crisp input and fuzzy parameters. In general, fuzzy regression can be classified into two categories:

(i)when the relations of the variables are subject to fuzziness,(ii)when the variables themselves are fuzzy.

There exist several conceptual and methodological approaches to fuzzy regression with respect to the characterization mentioned above. Tanaka and Watada [4], Tanaka et al. [5], and Tanaka and Ishibuchi [6] considered more general models in fuzzy regression. In the approaches of Tanaka et al., they considered the L-R fuzzy data and minimized the index of fuzziness of the fuzzy linear regression model. As described by Tanaka and Watada [4], “A fuzzy number is a fuzzy subset of the real line whose highest membership values are clustered around a given real number called the mean value; the membership function is monotonic on both sides of this mean value.” Hence, fuzzy number can be decomposed into position and fuzziness, where the position is represented by the element with the highest membership value and the fuzziness of a fuzzy number is represented by the membership function. The comparison among various fuzzy regression models and the difference between the approaches of fuzzy regression analysis and conventional regression analysis have been presented by Redden and Woodall [7]. Chang and Lee [8] and Redden and Woodall [7] pointed out some weaknesses of the approaches proposed by Tanaka et al. A fuzzy linear regression model based on Tanaka’s approach by considering the fuzzy linear programming problem has also been introduced by Peters [9].

In fuzzy set theory, the entropy is a measure of degree of fuzziness which expresses the amount of average ambiguity/difficulty in making a decision whether an element belongs to a set or not. The following are the four properties introduced in de Luca and Termini [10], which are widely accepted as a criterion for defining any new fuzzy entropy measure of the fuzzy set :

(i)P1 (sharpness): is minimum if and only if is a crisp set; that is, or for all ;(ii)P2 (maximality): is maximum if and only if for all ;(iii)P3 (resolution): , where is sharpened version of ;(iv)P4 (symmetry): , where is the complement of ; that is, .

Dubosis and Prade [11, 12] interpreted the measure of fuzziness as quantity of information which is being lost in going from a crisp number to a fuzzy number. It may be noted that the entropy of an element with a given membership function is increasing if is in [0, 0.5] and decreasing if is in [0.5, 1]. We accept the definition of fuzzy number given by Tanaka and Watada [4], where the mean value is also called apex.

Let be a discrete random variable with probability distribution in an experiment; then according to Shannon [13], the information contained in this experiment is given by

Based on this famous Shannon’s entropy, de Luca and Termini [10] indicated the following measure of fuzzy entropy:

Kumar et al. [14] studied fuzzy linear regression (FLR) model with some restrictions in the form of prior information and obtained the estimators of regression coefficients with the help of fuzzy entropy for the restricted FLR model. Here, we propose an intuitionistic fuzzy regression model and its general form in triangular intuitionistic fuzzy setup is given by

where the value of the output variable defined by (4) is a triangular intuitionistic fuzzy number; is a vector of intuitionistic fuzzy parameters where is a triangular intuitionistic fuzzy number for and are triangular intuitionistic fuzzy (explanatory) variables.

1.1. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Basic Definitions and Notations

It may be recalled that a fuzzy set in , given by Zadeh [1], is as follows:

where is the membership function of the fuzzy set and is the grade of belongingness of into . Thus in fuzzy set theory the grade of nonbelongingness of an element into is equal to . However, while expressing the degree of membership of an element in a fuzzy set, the corresponding degree of nonmembership is not always equal to one minus the degree of belongingness. The fact is that, in real life, the linguistic negation does not always identify with logical negation. Therefore, Atanassov [15–18] suggested a generalization of classical fuzzy set, called intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS).

Atanassov’s IFS under the universal set is defined as

where are the membership and nonmembership functions such that for all . The numbers and denote the degree of membership and nonmembership of an element to the set , respectively. For each element , the amount is called the degree of indeterminacy (hesitation part). It is the degree of uncertainty whether belongs to or not.

1.2. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers (IFNs)

In literature, Burillo and Bustince [19], Lee [20], Liu and Shi [21], and Grzegorzewski [22] proposed various research works on intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. In this section, the notion of IFNs has been studied and presented by the taking care of these research works.

Definition 1. An intuitionistic fuzzy subset of the real line is called an intuitionistic fuzzy number if the following axioms hold:

(i) is normal; that is, there exist (sometimes called the mean value of ) such that and ;(ii)the membership function is fuzzy-convex; that is,

(iii)the nonmembership function is fuzzy-concave; that is

(iv)the membership and the nonmembership functions of satisfying the conditions and have the following form:

 where the functions and are strictly increasing and decreasing functions in and , respectively, and

 where the functions and are strictly decreasing and increasing functions in and , respectively. Here and are called the left and right spreads of the membership function , respectively. and are called the left and right spreads of the nonmembership function . Symbolically, an intuitionistic fuzzy number is represented as .

Definition 2. An IFN may be defined as a triangular intuitionistic fuzzy number (TIFN) if and only if its membership and nonmembership functions take the following form:

It may be noted that a TIFN degenerate to a triangular fuzzy number if , , and , . Further, an TIFN ; that is, is a conjunction of two fuzzy numbers with the membership function and with the membership function .

The entropy calculated using (3) from the membership function of TIFN given by (11) can be expressed as follows: size

where and . It follows that , which does not depend on . It may be observed that, in the case of symmetrical TIFN, the left and the right entropies are identical. On the other hand, in case of nonsymmetric TIFN, the left entropy is a function of and the right entropy is a function of . Similarly, the left entropy and the right entropy from the nonmembership function (which we called left to left and right to right entropies) of the TIFN are the functions of and , respectively. Hence, a triangular intuitionistic fuzzy number can be characterized by five attributes: the position parameter , the left entropy , the right entropy , left to left entropy , and right to right entropy . There is a one-to-one correspondence between a triangular intuitionistic fuzzy number and its entropies. In other words, given a triangular intuitionistic fuzzy number, one can determine the unique position and entropies. Conversely, given a position and entropies, one can construct a unique triangular intuitionistic fuzzy number.

Sometimes experimenter’s past experiences may be available as prior information about unknown regression coefficients to estimate more efficient estimators. Here, we assume that such prior information is provided in the form of exact linear restrictions on regression coefficients. In the present work, we first find the unrestricted estimators of regression coefficients with the help of fuzzy entropy. Next, we introduce the restricted intuitionistic fuzzy linear regression model with fuzzy entropy. Further, the restricted estimators of the regression coefficients are obtained by incorporating the prior information in the form of linear restrictions.

2. Restricted IFWLR Model with Fuzzy Entropy

Without loss of generality, suppose that all observations (), , in the regression analysis are triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. The notion of regression using fuzzy entropy is to construct five conventional regression equations (one for apex, one for left entropy of the membership function, one for right entropy of the membership function, one for left entropy of the nonmembership function, and one for right entropy of the nonmembership function) for the response variable using the corresponding attributes of the fuzzy explanatory variables . In order to be specific, we denote by the apexes of , respectively, by the left entropy of , respectively, by the right entropy of , respectively, by the left to left entropy of , respectively, and by the right to right entropy of , respectively. Therefore, the five fundamental regression equations in a nonrecursive (nonadaptive) setup may be written as

where , , , , and are the error vectors of dimension . The compact form of the above mentioned nonrecursive or nonadaptive equations is given by

where

In many real life situations, where the measurements are carried out (for example car speed astronomical distance), it is natural to think that the spread (vagueness) in the measure of a phenomenon is proportional to its intensity. D’Urso and Gastaldi [23] have done several simulations and observed that even if we consider an adaptive or recursive regression model along with nonadaptive or nonrecursive regression model, they yield identical solutions when there is only one independent variable. But if there are more than one independent variable, then the estimated values of the left entropies and right entropies obtained through the recursive fuzzy regression model will have less variance as compared to the nonrecursive fuzzy regression model. With this consideration, we rewrite the proposed intuitionistic fuzzy linear regression model (15) in a recursive/adaptive setup where dynamic of the entropies is dependent on the magnitude of the estimated apexes as follows:

where is the -matrix containing the values of the input variables (data matrix), is a column -vector containing the regression coefficients for the apexes of the first model (referred to as core regression model), and are the vector of the observed apexes and the vector of the interpolated apexes, respectively, both having dimension , and are the vector of the observed left entropies and the vector of the interpolated left entropies, respectively, both having dimension , and are the vector of the observed right entropies and the vector of the interpolated right entropies, respectively, both having dimension , and are the vector of the observed left to left entropies and the vector of the interpolated left to left entropies, respectively, both having dimension , and are the vector of the observed right to right entropies and the vector of the interpolated right to right entropies, respectively, both having dimension , and 1 is a -vector of all 1′s, and are regression parameters for the second regression equation model (referred to as left entropy regression model), and are regression parameters for the third regression model (referred to as right entropy regression model), and are regression parameters for the fourth regression equation model (referred to as left to left entropy regression model), and and are regression parameters for the fifth regression equation model (referred to as right to right entropy regression model). The error term in the regression equation of apexes will remain the same while the error terms in the regression equations of entropies may be different. The error vectors and in the left and right entropies are of the dimension and the error vectors and in the left to left and right to right entropies are of the dimension .

If some prior information about unknown regression coefficients is available on the basis of past experiences, then it may be used to estimate more efficient estimators. We assume that such prior information is in the form of exact linear restrictions on regression coefficients. In the present model, we associate such restrictions in the equations for the estimation of regression coefficients in the intuitionistic fuzzy linear regression model with fuzzy entropy. Therefore, we make the model capable of taking into account possible linear relations between the size of the entropies and the magnitude of the estimated apexes. Moreover, we assume that the regression coefficients are subjected to the () exact linear restrictions, which are given by

where and are known and the matrix is of full row rank.

3. Estimation of Regression Coefficients

In many applications, it is possible that the values of the variables are on completely different scales of measurement. Also, the possible larger variations in the values will have larger intersample differences, so they will dominate in the calculation of Euclidean distances. Therefore, some form of standardization is necessary to balance out the individual contributions. Consider the Euclidean distance between two triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and along with weights , , , , and as follows:

It may be observed that we compute the usual squared differences between the values of variables on their original scales, as in the usual Euclidean distance, but then multiply these squared differences by their corresponding weights.

Next, similar to common linear regression (based on crisp data), the regression parameters are estimated by minimizing the following sum of square errors (we use a compact matrix notation):

Differentiating , that is, (20), partially with respect to and equating it to zero, we get

Similarly, differentiating (20) partially with respect to , , , , , , , and , we get

respectively.

Equations (21)–(29) are recursive solutions for the problem of least square estimation with intuitionistic fuzzy data. Therefore, we rewrite the system of equations explicitly in a recursive way as follows:

In order to initiate the recursive process of obtaining the estimators, we take some initial values for , , , , , , , , and . After several numbers of iterations, the values of estimators get corrected to a predefined error of tolerance. We denote these values by , , , , , , , , and in order to differentiate them from the eventually obtained restricted estimator in the next commutation.

In a more general setup, if, in the linear regression model (17), we consider crisp and intuitionistic fuzzy input variables, then the dimensions of and will be and , respectively. It may further be noted that the core of the solution’s structure will remain the same and we will have similar kind of estimators.

Remark. If a TIFN degenerate to a triangular fuzzy number , then our nonsymmetric intuitionistic fuzzy weighted linear regression model reduces to nonsymmetric fuzzy linear regression model defined by Kumar et al. [24].

Next, we assume that the regression coefficients are subjected to the linear restrictions which are given by (18). It may be noted that the unrestricted estimator obtained above in (21) does not satisfy the given restrictions (18). We aim to obtain the restricted estimator which satisfies the given restrictions under the regression model (17). For this, we propose to minimize the following score function:

where is the vector of Lagrange’s Multiplier.

Differentiating partially with respect to and equating it to zero, we get

Here, we again relabel the computed restricted estimator by . Therefore, in view of (21) and (32), we get size

Similarly, differentiating partially with respect to and equating it to zero, we get

From (33) and (34), we have

Also, differentiating (31) partially with respect to , , , , , , , and and equating all to zero, we get

respectively. From (35) we see that

Therefore, the estimator satisfies the given restrictions (18).

4. Numerical Examples

We consider the following numerical examples to illustrate the proposed model.

Example 1. We apply our procedure to estimate the intuitionistic fuzzy output value for a data consisting of the crisp input and intuitionistic fuzzy output (where left entropy and right entropy are equal) and tabulate the data in Table 1.
We obtain , , , , , , , , and where the number of iterations required is 125.

Table 1: Crisp input-int. fuzzy output data.

Object
    Crisp input
Int. fuzzy output )
Estimated int. fuzzy output )

1
3
5
9
44
42
96
42
44
44.9018
42.4850
94.3828
42.4850
44.9018

2
14
8
3
48
47
120
47
48
52.8505
50.5256
121.7099
50.5256
52.8505

3
7
1
4
35
33
52
33
35
32.2052
29.6416
50.7324
29.6416
32.2052

4
11
7
3
50
45
106
45
50
47.5861
45.2004
103.6114
45.2004
47.5861

5
7
12
15
80
79
189
79
80
74.0058
71.9256
194.4413
71.9256
74.0058

6
8
15
10
68
65
194
65
68
73.2147
71.1253
191.7213
71.1253
73.2147

7
3
9
6
45
42
107
42
45
48.5252
46.1503
106.8398
46.1503
48.5252

8
12
15
11
80
78
216
78
80
79.0260
77.0038
211.7003
77.0038
79.0260

9
10
5
8
55
52
108
52
55
50.5235
48.1717
113.7100
48.1717
50.5235

10
9
7
4
45
44
103
44
45
47.1612
44.7706
102.1507
44.7706
47.1612

Example 2. We apply our procedure to estimate intuitionistic fuzzy output value for a data consisting of crisp input and intuitionistic fuzzy output (where left and right entropy are not equal) and tabulate the data in Table 2.
We obtain , , , , , , , , and where the number of iterations required is 113.

Table 2: Crisp input-int. fuzzy output data.

Object
    Crisp input
Int. fuzzy output
Estimated int. fuzzy output

1
3
5
9
45
42
96
47
48
44.7743
42.7104
95.2620
45.5472
49.0053

2
14
8
3
48
47
120
43
45
52.5995
50.2809
120.905
52.3320
55.9734

3
7
1
4
35
33
52
50
55
31.3430
29.7162
51.2469
33.9018
37.0452

4
11
7
3
46
45
106
45
47
47.1120
44.9720
102.922
47.5741
51.0870

5
7
12
15
82
79
189
80
85
75.3765
72.3166
195.547
72.0805
76.2555

6
8
15
10
70
65
194
60
67
74.0419
71.0254
191.173
70.9234
75.0671

7
3
9
6
45
42
107
40
46
48.1512
45.9774
106.328
48.4752
52.0124

8
12
15
11
80
78
216
88
90
80.2328
77.0149
211.461
76.2912
80.5799

9
10
5
8
55
52
108
50
55
50.6447
48.3897
114.499
50.6370
54.2327

10
9
7
4
45
44
103
42
44
46.7241
44.5967
101.651
47.2377
50.7415

Example 3. We apply our procedure to estimate intuitionistic fuzzy output value for a data consisting of crisp input, intuitionistic fuzzy input, and intuitionistic fuzzy output (where left and right entropy are not equal) and tabulate the data in Table 3.
We obtain , , , , , , , , and where the number of iterations required is 51.

Table 3: Crisp and int. fuzzy input-int. fuzzy output data.

Object
    Crisp and int. fuzzy input )
        Int. fuzzy output )
    Estimated int. fuzzy output )

1
6
7
6
10
5
7
6
3
5
2
5
5.4158
2.5665
4.7776
2.2215
4.2473

2
7
6
5
12
4
6
7
5
4
5
7
5.8827
3.1771
6.2226
2.8438
4.9676

3
8
4
2
15
3
5
8
3
9
4
6
6.7973
4.3734
9.0537
4.0632
6.3788

4
9
7
5
20
8
10
7
3
10
2
4
6.4422
3.9089
7.9544
3.5897
5.8308

5
10
8
6
5
2
5
8
5
12
5
7
7.4885
5.2774
11.193
4.9846
7.4451

6
11
10
8
15
5
7
3
2
8
4
6
6.5757
4.0835
8.3678
3.7678
6.0369

7
12
20
15
25
12
14
6
5
7
3
5
6.2393
3.6436
7.3265
3.3193
5.5179

8
13
12
7
30
15
18
8
7
14
6
8
8.3421
6.3937
13.835
6.1226
8.7620

9
14
16
12
20
10
15
11
9
16
10
12
9.7423
8.2250
18.169
7.9893
10.9223

10
15
17
13
22
8
12
8
7
18
5
10
9.0740
7.3509
16.100
7.0982
9.8912

Example 4. We apply our procedure to estimate intuitionistic fuzzy output value for a data consisting of intuitionistic fuzzy input and intuitionistic fuzzy output (where left and right entropy are not equal) and tabulate the data in Table 4.
We obtain , , , , , , , , and where the number of iterations required is 255.

Table 4: Intuitionistic fuzzy input-intuitionistic fuzzy output data.

Object i
    Int. fuzzy input
        Int. fuzzy output )
    Estimated int. fuzzy output )

1
5
3
4
5
6
5
4
12
4
6
5.7505
4.2398
9.9797
4.2398
6.7505

2
7
6
7
8
9
7
5
7
5
8
5.7737
4.2652
10.045
4.2652
6.7737

3
5
3
6
8
9
5
3
9
3
6
4.8608
3.2665
7.4714
3.2665
5.8608

4
4
2
7
9
11
3
1
4
1
4
3.7872
2.0920
4.4446
2.0920
4.7872

5
3
2
5
7
8
4
2
6
2
5
4.9552
3.3698
7.7377
3.3698
5.9552

6
6
3
6
7
10
5
4
8
4
6
4.5158
2.8891
6.4987
2.8891
5.5158

7
5
2
4
9
12
4
3
9
3
5
5.5863
4.0602
9.5168
4.0602
6.5863

8
6
5
8
13
15
7
5
10
5
8
5.2404
3.6818
8.5417
3.6818
6.2404

9
8
7
12
15
17
4
3
5
3
5
3.9099
2.2262
4.7905
2.2262
4.9099

10
15
10
15
20
25
4
2
3
2
5
3.6202
1.9092
3.9736
1.9092
4.6202

5. Conclusions

An intuitionistic fuzzy weighted linear regression (IFWLR) model with and without some linear restrictions in the form of prior information has been studied. The estimators of regression coefficients have also been obtained with the help of fuzzy entropy for the restricted/unrestricted IFWLR model by assigning some weights in the distance function. It has been observed that the restricted estimator is better than unrestricted estimator in some sense. Thus, whenever some prior information is available in terms of exact linear restrictions on regression coefficients, it is advised to use restricted estimator in place of unrestricted estimator .

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Computation, vol. 8, pp. 338–353, 1965.

H. Tanaka, S. Uejima, and K. Asai, “Fuzzy linear regression model,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 10, pp. 2933–2938, 1980.

H. Tanaka, S. Uejima, and K. Asai, “Linear regression analysis with fuzzy model,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 903–907, 1982.

H. Tanaka and J. Watada, “Possibilistic linear systems and their application to the linear regression model,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 275–289, 1988.

H. Tanaka, I. Hayashi, and J. Watada, “Possibilistic linear regression analysis for fuzzy data,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 389–396, 1989.

H. Tanaka and H. Ishibuchi, “Identification of possibilistic linear systems by quadratic membership functions of fuzzy parameters,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 145–160, 1991.

D. T. Redden and W. H. Woodall, “Properties of certain fuzzy linear regression methods,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 361–375, 1994.

P.-T. Chang and E. S. Lee, “Fuzzy linear regression with spreads unrestricted in sign,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 61–70, 1994.

G. Peters, “Fuzzy linear regression with fuzzy intervals,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 45–55, 1994.

A. de Luca and S. Termini, “A definition of a nonprobabilistic entropy in the setting of fuzzy sets theory,” Information and Control, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 301–312, 1972.

D. Dubosis and H. Prade, Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1980.

D. Dubois and H. Prade, Fuzzy Sets and Statistical Possibility Theory, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1988.

C. E. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication,” The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, pp. 379–656, 1948.

T. Kumar, N. Gupta, and R. K. Bajaj, “Fuzzy entropy on restricted fuzzy linear regression model with cross validation and applications,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communications (ICACC '12), pp. 5–8, August 2012.

K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 1986.

K. T. Atanassov, “More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 1989.

K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications, vol. 35 of Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Physica, 1999.

K. T. Atanassov, “New operations defined over the intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 137–142, 1994.

P. Burillo and H. Bustince, “Some definitions of intuitionistic fuzzy number,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT '03), pp. 223–227, Zittau, Germany, September 2003.

F. Lee, Fuzzy Information Processing System, Peking University Press, Beijing, China, 1998.

H. Liu and K. Shi, “Intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and intuitionistic distribution numbers,” Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 909–918, 2000.

P. Grzegorzewski, “Distances and orderings in a family of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT '03), pp. 223–227, Zittau, Germany, September 2003.

P. D'Urso and T. Gastaldi, “A least-squares approach to fuzzy linear regression analysis,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 427–440, 2000.

T. Kumar, R. K. Bajaj, and N. Gupta, “Fuzzy entropy in fuzzy weighted linear regression model under linear restrictions with simulation study,” International Journal of General Systems, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 135–148, 2014.