Biotechnology Research International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 571520, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/571520

Research Article

Assessing the Effect of Composting Cassava Peel Based Substrates on the Yield, Nutritional Quality, and Physical Characteristics of Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq. ex Fr.) Kummer

N. K. Kortei,¹ V. P. Dzogbefia,² and M. Obodai³

¹Department of Nuclear Agriculture and Radiation Processing, Graduate School of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, P.O. Box 80, Legon, Ghana
²Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biosciences, KNUST, PMB, Kumasi, Ghana
³CSIR-Food Research Institute, P.O. Box M 20, Accra, Ghana

Received 20 July 2014; Revised 12 November 2014; Accepted 12 November 2014; Published 17 December 2014

Academic Editor: Manuel Canovas

Copyright © 2014 N. K. Kortei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Cassava peel based substrate formulations as an alternative substrate were used to grow mushrooms. The effect of two compost heights, three composting periods on the mycelia growth, physical characteristics, yield, and nutritional qualities of Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq. ex Fr.) Kummer was studied. Mean mycelia growth of 16.2 cm after a period of seven (7) weeks was the best for 1.5 m compost height. Cap diameter and stipe length differed significantly () with the compost heights (0.8 m and 1.5 m). The yield on compost height of 1.5 m, composted for 5 days, differed significantly () from that of 0.8 m and gave increasing yields as follows: cassava peels and manure, cassava peels only, cassava peels and corn cobs (1 : 1 ratio), and cassava peels and corn cobs (1 : 1 ratio) with chicken manure. Composting periods (3 and 7 days) gave varying yields depending on the compost height. Based on the findings an interaction of 1.5 m compost height and 5 days composting period on cassava peels and corncobs (1 : 1 ratio) with chicken manure produced the best results. The nutritional quality of the mushrooms also differed significantly (), indicating that cassava peels could be used as a possible substrate in cultivation of mushroom.

1. Introduction

In the cultivation of mushrooms, various lignocellulosic wastes are used as substrates and these act as sources of nutrients for their growth [1]. These wastes include, among other cereal grains, rice straw, wheat straw, cottonseed hulls, soybean meal, and sawdust [2–5]. Due to varying nutrients in the substrates, different mushroom yields have been recorded by various workers [6, 7]. Pleurotus spp. are macrofungi which utilize polysaccharides (cellulose and hemicelluloses) from various lignocelluloses to produce expensive protein for human consumption [8, 9]. Their global economic value is now incredible, and the reason for the rise in consumption is a combination of their value as food [10, 11] and their medicinal or nutraceutical properties [12–15].

Composting is an aerobic process in which microorganisms convert a mixed organic substrate into carbon dioxide (CO₂), water, minerals, and stabilized organic matter. It is a solid-state fermentation process, which exploits the phenomenon of microbial degradation and mineralization [16, 17]. Control of environmental conditions during the process distinguishes composting from natural rotting or decomposition [18]. Controlled conditions, particularly of moisture and aeration, are required to yield temperatures (49°C–60°C) conducive to the microorganisms involved in the composting process [19]. Temperature is the main factor that controls microbial activity during composting [20].

Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz, Euphorbiaceae) is the sixth most important food crop globally, in terms of annual production [21], and is a staple food for approximately 800 million people [22, 23]. This perennial root crop is grown in the tropics, including sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, Pacific Islands, and Central and South America [23–25]. In Ghana its annual production is approximately 6.6 million metric tons [26] and total production for 2010 was 13,504,100 tonnes [21]. The peel is a byproduct of processing the roots for starch, cassava flour, and “gari” (a fermented cassava meal product) which constitute 11% of the root, with approximately 400,000 MT (dry matter basis) of it produced annually [27]. Cassava peels and corncobs are lignocellulosic materials which consist of three main components, namely, cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin [28, 29].

This paper presents the effect of composting height, period, and supplementation with chicken manure on the yield, nutritional quality, and some physical characteristics of Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq. ex Fr.) Kummer cultivated on different cassava peel based substrate formulations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Spawn and Compost Preparation

Cultures of P. ostreatus (Jacq. ex Fr.) Kummer strain EM-1 originally from Mauritius were maintained on potato dextrose agar slants and used to prepare sorghum grain spawn [33]. Compost was prepared by the outdoor single-phase solid waste fermentation. Dried cassava peels and corncobs substrates were reduced to average particle sizes of 0.5 cm² and 1.2 cm², respectively. Substrates were obtained from Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) campus and its environs, Kumasi. The substrates were mixed with chicken manure and lime and composted as described by [34]. The mixture was then stacked into a heap of 1.5 m height and 1.5 m base width, as well as 0.8 m height and 0.8 m width, and left to compost for varying number of days (3, 5, and 7) with regular turnings every 2 days. Moisture content was adjusted to approximately 68–70% [35]. Compost sizes (105 kg and 315 kg) used in this study were directly related to the respective compost heights (0.8 m and 1.5 m).

2.2. Preparation of Substrate Mixtures

At the end of the composting period, varying combinations of cassava peels and corncob mixtures were prepared and bagged. Substrate mixtures obtained were as shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Substrate compositions and codes of the experiment.

Substrate code
Substrate composition

cm
100% cassava peels + chicken manure

ncm
100% cassava peels + no chicken manure

cmcc
50% cassava peels + 50% corncobs + chicken manure

ncmcc
50% cassava peels + 50% corncobs + no chicken manure

Amount of chicken manure added was 16.5 kg (10% w/w).

2.3. Bagging

One kilogram of each substrate mixture was bagged into heat resistant polypropylene bags of dimension 29 × 9 cm. For each treatment, 8 replicates were used.

2.4. Sterilization

The bagged substrates were then sterilized with moist heat in drums at temperatures of 95–100°C for 2.5 hours.

2.5. Inoculation, Incubation, and Cropping

The bags were inoculated with 5 g of spawn and incubated at ambient temperature (28–32°C) for approximately 35 days. From the incubation room, the bags were sent to the cropping house where the compost bags were placed on horizontal shelves. They were slit open at the neck in the cropping house where humidity of 80–85% was maintained by watering twice a day.

2.6. Mycelial Growth, Cap Diameter, Stipe Length, and Yield Measurements

(i)Mycelial growth = (longest growth + shortest growth)/2(ii)Average cap diameter = (longest + shortest cap diameter)/2(iii)Stipe length = length of cap base to end of stalk(iv)Yield = biological efficiency (B.E) (%) = fresh weight of mushrooms/dry weight of substrates × 100.

2.7. Proximate Analysis

All the moisture, fat, ash, protein, and carbohydrate content were determined by Association of Official Analytical Chemists Methodology [36].

2.8. Dietary Fibre

The content of soluble, insoluble, and total fibre was determined using AOAC 991.43 method [36].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All experiments performed were subjected to analyses of variance (one-way ANOVA) and then significant differences were determined using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) with SPSS 16 (Chicago, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mycelial Growth

The various substrate combinations and composting treatments (Table 1) resulted in different growth responses due to the relative distribution of nutrients. Mycelial growth was significantly () affected by compost height, composting period, substrate combination, and supplementation (Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6). Higher compost heights and longer composting periods provided sufficient temperatures for microbial activities which allowed for greater decomposition of polysaccharides into smaller units for usage by microorganisms and mushroom mycelia. This was evident in producing the longest mycelia length of 16.3 cm on ncmcc (50% cassava peels + 50% corncobs + no chicken manure) of 5 days’ composting period and 1.5 m height at the end of the seventh (7th) week of incubation (Figure 5). The shortest mycelia length of 8.1 cm was recorded by 100% cassava peels composted for 3 days of 0.8 m height (Figure 1). Generally, cm and ncm (100% cassava peels + chicken manure and 100% cassava peels + no chicken manure, resp.) and their interactions performed poorly. Conversely, mixture of cassava peels and corncobs (1 : 1 ratio) and its interactions supported good mycelia growth perhaps because of its porosity and high proportion of cellulose [37]. Mixtures of various agricultural wastes have been reported by Akinyele and Adetuyi [38] to give good yields of mushroom mycelia. Additionally, this substrate mixture possesses a better C/N ratio of about 159.12 compared to the C/N ratio of cassava peels (Table 2) [28]. This agrees with the findings of Mantovani et al. [39] who reported that greater C/N ratios promoted good fungal growth as they investigated the effect of the addition of nitrogen sources to cassava fiber and carbon-to-nitrogen ratios on fungal growth.

Table 2: Chemical analysis of substrates (dry weight) used in experiments.

Waste
Moisture (%)
Ash (%)
Nitrogen (%)
Protein (%)
Carbon (%)
C/N
pH

Cassava peels
2.42
6.46
1
6.25
44.82
44.82
5.7

Corncobs
2.39
1.98
0.4
2.5
45.66
114.2
4.74

Chicken manure
3.3
18.50
2
30
7
3.5
6.3

Source: [28, 30–32].

Figure 1: Weekly mycelial growth on substrates of 0.8 m compost height and 3 days’ composting period.

Figure 2: Weekly mycelial growth on substrates of 0.8 m compost height and 5 days’ composting period.

Figure 3: Weekly mycelial growth on substrates of 0.8 m compost height and 7 days’ composting period.

Figure 4: Weekly mycelial growth on substrates of 1.5 m compost height and 3 days’ composting period.

Figure 5: Weekly mycelial growth on substrates of 1.5 m compost height and 5 days’ composting period.

Figure 6: Weekly mycelial growth on substrates of 1.5 m compost height and 7 days’ composting period.

Interplay of these factors on mycelia colonization rate confirms the fact that both the substrate formula and the strain used affect mycelial growth rate and therefore the incubation and crop cycle duration [2, 39]. There was no significant () difference in the growth of mycelia on combined substrates of 50% cassava peels and 50% corncobs whether supplemented or not.

3.2. Yield

The yield of mushrooms obtained from the two compost heights (0.8 m and 1.5 m) studied differed significantly (). Comparing the yield of mushrooms harvested from the two compost heights, higher yields were generally obtained from compost height 1.5 m and its interactions of composting periods the various substrates (Table 3(a)) than the 0.8 m compost height and its interactions (Table 3(b)). This trend suggests that the period of composting and the height for composting were insufficient to support microbial activity [20]. Also, the degree of decomposition in the compost heights (0.8 m and 1.5 m) with respect to nutrients available may account for the differences in the yield of mushrooms harvested [33].

Table 3: Yield of mushrooms from interactions of compost height, composting period, substrates, and supplementation.

(a) −0.8 m compost height

Period (days)
Substrate
Flush
Total
B.E (%)

1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th

3
cm
57
42
33
33
24
189a
27

ncm
49
46
38
30
19
182a
26

cmcc
59
50
45
34
31
219b
31.3

ncmcc
56
55
50
29
28
218b
31.1

5
cm
59
51
49
40
29
228c
32.6

ncm
45
42
31
27
23
168a
24

cmcc
61
55
52
33
31
232c
33

ncmcc
60
58
52
37
25
232c
33

7
cm
62
57
52
41
28
240c
34.3

ncm
53
39
39
32
20
183a
26.1

cmcc
64
60
57
38
22
241c
34.4

ncmcc
56
58
54
43
25
236c
33.7

Means with the same letters in a column are not significantly different (). Results are mean scores of 8.

(b) −1.5 m compost height

Period (days)
Substrate
Flush
Total
B.E (%)

1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th

3
cm
48
46
45
37
19
195a
27.9

ncm
50
45
45
32
30
202a
28.8

cmcc
65
62
53
44
37
261b
37.3

ncmcc
66
59
57
51
24
257b
36.7

5
cm
59
51
35
31
26
202a
28.9

ncm
70
70
42
63
34
279c
39.9

cmcc
71
64
58
52
43
288c
41.1

ncmcc
71
72
59
50
45
297d
42.4

7
cm
63
53
40
37
30
223a
31.9

ncm
68
60
55
53
39
275c
39.3

cmcc
74
64
60
58
43
299d
42.7

ncmcc
71
67
57
49
44
288d
41.1

Means with the same letters in a column are not significantly different (). Results are mean scores of 8.

An interaction of 1.5 m compost height 5 days’ composting period and a substrate mixture of cassava peels and corncobs (1 : 1 ratio) supplemented with chicken manure produced the highest yield of 299 g (Table 3(b)) and the lowest yield of 163 g (Table 3(a)) from ncm (100% cassava peels + no chicken manure), 0.8 m and 5 days composting period. Essentially, previous works done by Hudson [40] and Carlile and Watkinson [41] suggest that nutrient release during aerobic fermentation of composting is temperature dependent so higher compost heights (larger size) will result in higher temperatures, which, according to Vetayasuporn [42], support effective microorganisms to digest (mainly by lignocellulolytic enzymes) the substrate and subsequently release different sugars. Digestion of cellulose produces glucose and cellobiose, while digestion of hemicellulose produces mostly xylose and other sugars, such as galactose, mannose, arabinose, pyranose, glucuronic acid, and galacturonic acid as secondary products [43–45]. These are converted into sources of carbon which are easily utilized for growth of mycelia, primordial initiation, fruit body formation, and ultimately higher yields. There was a general inverse correlation of yield to flush number increase (Tables 3(a) and 3(b)). This could be attributed to depletion of nutrients in the substrate and accumulation of some metabolites which inhibited growth [1]. Yields obtained in this study were lower than results reported by some researchers [35, 46]. However yields were within range of results reported by [47].

3.3. Physical Characteristics

The cap diameter and stipe lengths of P. ostreatus grown on different substrate mixtures differed significantly () as a result of probable presence of little or complete lack of some vital nutrients, especially nitrogen, needed for P. ostreatus growth in cassava peel. Comparatively smaller sizes were recorded for 0.8 m compost height, composting period, and substrate interactions. The ranges of cap diameter and stipe lengths were 6.5–3.6 cm and 5.5–1.8 cm, respectively (Table 10).

On the other hand, bigger sizes were recorded for 1.5 m compost height, composting periods, and substrate mixture interactions. They were in the ranges 7–5 cm and 5.2–4.1 cm for cap diameter and stipe lengths, respectively (Table 10). Nitrogen and carbon are two essential elements required for cellular functions for growth and various metabolic activities, particularly protein and enzymes synthesis [43]. Carbon is readily available from cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin from the substrates, but nitrogen occurs mainly in a bound form and is not available until it is enzymatically released. Absence or limited supply of any of these elements may result in poor physical growth.

Raymond et al. [47] reported that the yield of Pleurotus mushroom could be boosted by the addition of nitrogenous supplements. The ranges were in agreement with [11, 48–50]. Analysis of cap diameters and stipe lengths revealed significant differences () between the two compost heights.

3.4. Nutritional Content

The various interactions of compost heights, composting periods, substrates, and environmental conditions resulted in significantly different () nutritional compositions of mushrooms from this experiment.

The moisture content of the samples ranged from 83.3 to 85.6% (Table 4) within the category of high moisture foods, thus making them highly perishable [51]. High moisture contents promote susceptibility to microbial growth and enzyme activity [51]. Works of researchers [52, 53] reported comparable values of 84-85%.

Table 4: Average moisture content (%) of mushrooms harvested on different substrates.

Substrate type
0.8 M
1.5 M

Composting period
Composting period

3 days
5 days
7 days
3 days
5 days
7 days

CM
84.63 ± 0.01
84.57 ± 0.02
84.51 ± 0.02
85.48 ± 0.01
84.27 ± 0.03
84.11 ± 0.02

NCM
84.78 ± 0.03
84.83 ± 0.02
84.58 ± 0.01
84.63 ± 0.02
84.71 ± 0.01
84.63 ± 0.01

NCMCC
83.64 ± 0.02
84.39 ± 0.01
83.72 ± 0.01
84.37 ± 0.02
83.42 ± 0.02
83.33 ± 0.02

CMCC
84.80 ± 0.01
85.72 ± 0.02
84.58 ± 0.03
83.44 ± 0.01
84.51 ± 0.02
85.60 ± 0.03

Results are mean scores of 3 ± SE.

The ash content ranged from 7.32 to 7.83% (Table 5). The differences in ash content for respective samples grown on different substrate formulations were not significant (). Ash content of foods represents their mineral element composition. Mushrooms are good bioaccumulators of mineral elements and that is evident in their medicinal attributes. Some mineral elements are needed in the body for the formation of red blood cells, formation of strong teeth and bones, and so forth [54].

Table 5: Average ash content (%) of mushrooms harvested on different substrates.

Substrate
type
0.8 M
1.5 M

Composting period
Composting period

3 days
5 days
7 days
3 days
5 days
7 days

cm
7.61 ± 0.1
7.83 ± 0.1
7.81 ± 0.3
7.48 ± 0.2
7.59 ± 0.2
7.64 ± 0.1

ncm
7.49 ± 0.2
7.47 ± 0.2
7.52 ± 0.2
7.61 ± 0.1
7.71 ± 0.2
7.69 ± 0.2

ncmcc
7.32 ± 0.1
7.41 ± 0.1
7.65 ± 0.3
7.70 ± 0.1
7.63 ± 0.3
7.82 ± 0.2

cmcc
7.55 ± 0.1
7.49 ± 0.3
7.60 ± 0.1
7.67 ± 0.2
7.34 ± 0.1
7.65 ± 0.1

Results are mean scores of 3 ± SE.

These values were slightly higher than works of [54, 55] but were however lower than work of Aida et al. [56]. There were appreciable quantities of fiber in the mushroom samples examined. As shown in Table 6, the fibre content of the mushrooms ranged from 8.39 to 8.88%. This observation agrees with works of researchers [10, 57] who recorded similar values. There were no significant differences () between the values obtained for mushrooms cultivated under the various conditions. Fungi derived β-glucans are notable for their ability to modulate the immune system [10, 58]. The values obtained under various growing conditions for fat were in the range of 2.14–2.22% (Table 7). There was no significant difference (). This range of fat content is lower than that of earlier report of Jaworska et al. [59] and much depends on the nature of substrate. However, lower values were obtained by Aida et al. [56].

Table 6: Average fibre content (%) of mushrooms harvested on different substrates.

Substrate type
Compost height

0.8 M
1.5 M

Composting period
Composting period

3 days
5 days
7 days
3 days
5 days
7 days

cm
8.42 ± 0.14
8.47 ± 014
8.39 ± 0.13
8.72 ± 0.14
8.48 ± 0.14
8.69 ± 0.14

ncm
8.47 ± 0.13
8.69 ± 0.13
8.57 ± 0.15
8.68 ± 0.14
8.75 ± 0.14
8.88 ± 0.15

ncmcc
8.56 ± 0.15
8.77 ± 0.14
8.79 ± 0.14
8.80 ± 0.13
8.78 ± 0.14
8.74 ± 0.13

cmcc
8.73 ± 0.14
8.74 ± 0.14
8.86 ± 0.15
8.80 ± 0.13
8.81 ± 0.13
8.79 ± 0.14

Results are mean scores of 3 ± SE.

Table 7: Average fat content (%) of mushrooms harvested on different substrates.

Substrate type
Compost height

0.8 M
1.5 M

Composting period
Composting period

3 days
5 days
7 days
3 days
5 days
7 days

CM
2.16 ± 0.13
2.17 ± 0.14
2.17 ± 0.12
2.15 ± 0.13
2.16 ± 0.14
2.16 ± 0.14

NCM
2.14 ± 0.13
2.18 ± 0.13
2.20 ± 0.11
2.18 ± 0.12
2.17 ± 0.13
2.18 ± 0.13

NCMCC
2.17 ± 0.14
2.17 ± 0.13
2.16 ± 0.13
2.17 ± 0.14
2.19 ± 0.13
2.16 ± 0.14

CMCC
2.24 ± 0.12
2.19 ± 0.14
2.22 ± 0.12
2.18 ± 0.14
2.18 ± 0.14
2.15 ± 0.13

Results are mean scores of 3 ± SE.

Protein contents ranged from 10.48 to 10.80% (Table 8). They differed significantly () with regard to the various interactions. Jaworska et al. [59] reported that not only the protein content of the substrate but also nature of protein in the substrate influences the protein content of the fruiting bodies. Values obtained were within range of works [52, 56] but lower than works of [10, 55, 57, 60, 61]. The carbohydrate values fell within the range of 73.3–74.5% (Table 9). They differed significantly (). The values obtained were higher than previous works [31, 32, 52] which recorded 65.8–66.8% values for total carbohydrate content in different Pleurotus species.

Table 8: Average protein content (%) of mushrooms harvested on different substrates.

Substrate type
Compost height

0.8 M
1.5 M

Composting period
Composting period

3 days
5 days
7 days
3 days
5 days
7 days

CM
10.65 ± 0.13
10.60 ± 0.14
10.72 ± 0.12
10.62 ± 0.13
10.53 ± 0.14
10.69 ± 0.14

NCM
10.58 ± 0.13
10.54 ± 0.13
10.61 ± 0.14
10.68 ± 0.14
10.71 ± 0.12
10.48 ± 0.14

NCMCC
10.73 ± 0.12
10.78 ± 0.14
10.66 ± 0.13
10.57 ± 0.13
10.83 ± 0.13
10.66 ± 0.13

CMCC
10.64 ± 0.14
10.49 ± 0.12
10.78 ± 0.13
10.64 ± 0.14
10.80 ± 0.14
10.53 ± 0.13

Results are mean scores of 3 ± SE.

Table 9: Average carbohydrate content (%) of mushrooms harvested on different substrates.

Substrate type
Compost height

0.8 M
1.5 M

Composting period
Composting period

3 days
5 days
7 days
3 days
5 days
7 days

CM
74.61 ± 0.13
74.49 ± 0.14
74.68 ± 0.13
74.52 ± 0.12
74.61 ± 0.14
74.58 ± 0.13

NCM
74.80 ± 0.14
74.46 ± 0.12
73.55 ± 0.13
74.64 ± 0.14
73.34 ± 0.13
73.07 ± 0.13

NCMCC
73.64 ± 0.13
74.50 ± 0.13
74.80 ± 0.12
74.14 ± 013
74.72 ± 0.13
73.98 ± 0.12

CMCC
72.19 ± 0.13
73.88 ± 0.13
73.92 ± 0.14
74.51 ± 0.13
74.77 ± 0.14
74.80 ± 0.13

Results are mean scores of 3 ± SE.

Table 10: Effect of compost height, composting period, and substrate interactions on the physical characteristics of Pleurotus ostreatus.

Time
0.8 m compost height
1.5 m compost height

Substrate
Cap diameter
Stipe length
Cap diameter
Stipe length

3 days
cm
5.5b
5.5c
5.0a
4.1a

ncm
3.6a
1.8a
5.1a
4.2a

cmcc
5.5b
3.0b
5.4b
4.0a

ncmcc
4.3a
3.4b
5.7c
5.2c

5 days
cm
5.6b
3.3b
5.6c
5.0b

ncm
3.7a
1.8a
6.1c
5.1c

cmcc
4.4a
3.0b
7.0d
5.0b

ncmcc
5.6b
3.3b
6.1c
5.2c

7 days
cm
6.1c
4.0b
5.9c
4.9b

ncm
4.0a
3.4b
6.0c
5.0b

cmcc
6.5c
5.0c
6.6d
5.0b

ncmcc
6.4c
5.2c
6.3c
5.1c

Means with the same letters in a column are not significantly different ().

Results are mean scores of 8.

4. Conclusion

This study found out that compost size is directly related to the degree of decomposition which in turn accounts for nutrient release for growth of mushrooms. The overall best yield (299 g) was produced by the interaction of 1.5 m compost height, 5 days’ composting period, and substrate mixture of cassava peels and corncobs (1 : 1 ratio) supplemented with chicken manure. It can therefore be concluded that greater compost heights give optimum yields and good physical attributes and nutrient quality.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

The authors’ special gratitude goes to the laboratory staff at the Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, KNUST, for their immense technical assistance during the work.

References

R. C. Upadhyay, R. N. Verma, S. K. Singh, and M. C. Yadav, “Effect of organic nitrogen supplementation on Pleurotus species,” in Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products, Sanchez et al., Ed., UAEM, 2002.

P. Przybylowicz and J. Donoghue, Shiitake Growers Handbook: The Art and Science of Mushroom Cultivation, Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, 1990.

D. Levanon, N. Rothschild, O. Danai, and S. Masaphy, “Bulk treatment of substrate for the cultivation of Shiitake mushrooms (Lentinus edodes) on straw,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 63–64, 1993.

N. A. Bisko and V. T. Bilay, “Some physiological aspects of the cultivation of Lentinula edodes (Berk.) Sing,” in Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products, D. J. Royse, Ed., pp. 381–386, Pennsylvania State University, 1996.

A. Philippoussis, P. Diamantopoulou, G. Zervakis, and H. Euthimiadou, “The composition and the porosity of lignocellulosic substrates influence mycelium growth and respiration rates of Lentinula edodes,” International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 198–201, 2001.

G. J. Adebayo, B. N. Omolara, and A. E. Toyin, “Evaluation of yield of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus pulmonarius) grown on cotton waste and cassava peel,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 215–218, 2009.

M. M. Baig, A. A. Syed, J. A. Kadam, V. P. Mane, and S. S. Patil, “Biological efficiency and Nutritional contents of Pleurotus florida (Mont.) Singer cultivated on different agro-wastes,” Nature and Science, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 154–160, 2009.

C. M. Gbedemah, M. Obodai, and L. C. Sawyerr, “Preliminary investigations into the bioconversion of gamma irradiated agricultural waste by Pleurotus spp,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 1–6, pp. 379–382, 1998.

J. Frimpong-Manso, M. Obodai, M. Dzomeku, and M. M. Apertorgbor, “Influence of rice husk on biological efficiency and nutrient content of Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq. Ex. Fr.) Kummer,” International Food Research Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 249–254, 2011.

P. Kalač, “Chemical composition and nutritional value of European species of wild growing mushrooms: a review,” Food Chemistry, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2009.

J. N. K. Kortei, Determination of optimal growth and yield parameters of Pleurotus ostreatus grown on composted cassava peel based formulations [Msc. thesis], Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana, 2008.

J. N. K. Kortei, Growing Oyster Mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus) on Composted Agrowastes: An Efficient Way of Utilizing Lignocellulosic Materials, Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken, Germany, 2011.

I. C. F. R. Ferreira, J. A. Vaz, M. H. Vasconcelos, and A. Martins, “Compounds from wild mushrooms with antitumor potential,” Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 424–436, 2010.

I. C. F. R. Ferreira, L. Barros, and R. M. V. Abreu, “Antioxidants in wild mushrooms,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1543–1560, 2009.

V. K. Singh, Y. Patel, and R. Naraian, “Medicinal properties of Pleurotus species (oyster mushroom): a review,” World Journal of Fungal and Plant Biology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2012.

T. Beffa, The Composting Biotechnology: A Microbial Aerobic, 2002.

V. L. McKinley and J. R. Vestal, “Biokinetic analyses of adaptation and succession: microbial activity in composting municipal sewage sludge,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 933–941, 1984.

F. Zucconi and M. de Bertoldi, “Compost specifications for the production and characterization of compost from municipal solid waste,” in Compost: Production, Quality and Use, M. de Bertoldi, M. P. Ferranti, P. L'Hermite, and F. Zucconi, Eds., pp. 30–50, Elsevier Applied Science, London, UK, 1987.

Y. Chen and U. Inbar, “Chemical and spectroscopical analyses of organic matter transformation during composting in relation to compost maturity,” in Science and Engineering of Composting, H. A. J. Hoitink and H. M. Keener, Eds., pp. 550–600, Worthington, Ohio, USA, 1993.

J. I. Boulter, G. J. Boland, and J. T. Trevors, “Compost: a study of the development process and end-product potential for suppression of turfgrass disease,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 115–134, 2000.

FAOSTAT, Food and Agricultural Commodities Production, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations Statistics Database, 2010.

FAO/IFAD, The World Cassava Economy; Facts, Trends and Outlooks, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and International Fund for Agricultural Development, Rome, Italy.

V. Lebot, Tropical Root and Tuber Crops: Cassava, Sweet Potato, Yam and Aroids, CABI, Wallingford, UK, 2009.

D. McKey, T. R. Cavagnaro, J. Cliff, and R. Gleadow, “Chemical ecology in coupled human and natural systems: people, manioc, multitrophic interactions and global change,” Chemoecology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 109–133, 2010.

A. Burns, R. Gleadow, J. Cliff, A. Zacarias, and T. Cavagnaro, “Cassava: the drought, war and famine crop in a changing world,” Sustainability, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 3572–3607, 2010.

FAO, “Food and agricultural commodities production,” June 2012, http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx

FAOSTAT, Food and Agricultural Commodities Production, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Database, 2012.

J. Baah, R. M. Tait, and A. K. Tuah, “Selecting browse plants to supplement cassava peel-based diet for peri-urban small ruminants,” Small Ruminant Research, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 36–40, 2011.

M. R. Youri, Formulation of media for the production of Pleurotus ostreatus using agro-processing waste [M.S. thesis], Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Ghana, 2003.

J. A. Buswell, “Potential of spent mushroom substrate for bioremediation purposes,” Compost Science and Utilization, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 31–35, 1994.

NRAES, Poultry Waste Management Handbook (NRAES-132), Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service, Cooperative Extension, Ithaca, NY, USA, 1999.

A. Dundar, H. Acay, and A. Yildiz, “The effect of using lignocellulosic wastes for cultivation of Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq.) P. Kumm. on mushroom yield, chemical composition and nutritional value,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 662–666, 2009.

M. A. Hubbe, M. Nazhad, and C. Sánchez, “Composting as a way to convert cellulosic biomass and organic waste into high-value soil amendments: a review,” BioResources, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 2808–2854, 2010.

P. Oei, Manual on Mushroom Cultivation-Techniques, Species and Opportunities for Commercial Application in Developing Countries, CTA, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1991.

M. Obodai and K. A. Vowortor, “Performance of different strains of Pleurotus spp. under Ghanaian conditions,” The Journal of Food Technology in Africa, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 98–100, 2002.

AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, AOAC International, Gaithersburg, Md, USA, 16th edition, 1996.

S. T. Chang and P. G. Miles, Edible Mushrooms and Their Cultivation, Academic Press, London, UK, 1989.

B. J. Akinyele and F. C. Adetuyi, “Effect of agrowastes, pH and temperature variation on the growth of Volvariella volvacea,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1390–1395, 2005.

T. R. Mantovani, G. A. Linde, and N. B. Colauto, “Effect of the addition of nitrogen sources to cassava fibre and carbon to nitrogen ratios on Agaricus brasiliensis growth,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 139–143, 2007.

H. J. Hudson, “Fungi as inhabitants of extreme environments,” in Fungal Biology, pp. 298–300, Edward Arnold, London, UK, 1986.

M. J. Carlile and S. C. Watkinson, The Fungi, Academic Press, London, UK, 1996.

S. Vetayasuporn, “Oyster mushroom cultivation on different cellulosic substrates,” Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 548–551, 2006.

P. Albersheim, “The primary cell wall,” in Plant Biochemistry, J. Bonner and J. E. Varner, Eds., pp. 225–274, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1976.

B. Keller, “Structural cell wall proteins,” Plant Physiology, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 1127–1130, 1993.

A. J. Clarke, Biodegradation of Cellulose: Enzymology and Biotechnology, Technomic, Lancaster, Pa, USA, 1997.

I. F. Zadrazil, “Conversion of lignocellulosics into animal feed with white rot fungi,” in Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products, S. T. Chang, J. A. Buswell, and C. Siu-wai, Eds., pp. 298–305, Chinese University Press, Hong Kong, China, 1993.

P. Raymond, A. Mshandete, and A. K. MKivaisi, “Cultivation of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus HK-37) on solid sisal waste fractions supplemented with cow dung manure,” Journal of Biology and Life Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 273–286, 2013.

A. M. Mshandete, “Cultivation of Pleurotus HK-37 and Pleurotus sapidus (oyster mushrooms) on cattail weed (Typha domingensis) substrate in Tanzania,” International Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 35–44, 2011.

G. Owusu-Boateng and V. Dzogbefia, “Establishing some parameters for the cultivation of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) on cocoa husk,” Journal of the Ghana Science Association, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2005.

T. O. Adejumo and O. B. Awosanya, “Proximate and mineral composition of four edible mushroom species from South Western Nigeria,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1084–1088, 2005.

G. Owusu-Boateng, Studies on scale-up process for the cultivation of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) on cocoa husk [Msc. Thesis], Department of Biochemistry, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana, 2001.

V. A. Aletor, “Compositional studies on edible tropical species of mushrooms,” Food Chemistry, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 265–268, 1995.

M. Bonatti, P. Karnopp, H. M. Soares, and S. A. Furlan, “Evaluation of Pleurotus ostreatus and Pleurotus sajor-caju nutritional characteristics when cultivated in different lignocellulosic wastes,” Food Chemistry, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 425–428, 2004.

M. M. V. Baig, S. S. Patil, S. A. Ahmed, and S. M. Telang, “The nutritional value of Pleurotus ostreatus (Jacq.Fr) Kum cultivated on different lignocellulosic agrowastes,” Innovative Romanian Food Biotechnology, vol. 7, pp. 66–76, 2010.

M. Akyüz and S. Kirbag, “Nutritive value of wild edible and cultured mushrooms,” Turkish Journal of Biology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 97–102, 2010.

F. M. N. A. Aida, M. Shuhaimi, M. Yazid, and A. G. Maaruf, “Mushroom as a potential source of prebiotics: a review,” Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 20, no. 11-12, pp. 567–575, 2009.

W. I. W. Rosli and M. S. Aishah, “Effect of different drying techniques on the nutritional values of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus sajor-caju),” Sains Malaysiana, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 937–941, 2013.

D. Wang, A. Sakoda, and M. Suzuki, “Biological efficiency and nutritional value of Pleurotus ostreatus cultivated on spent beer grain,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 293–300, 2001.

G. Jaworska, E. Bernas, and B. Mickowska, “Effects of production process on the amino acid content of frozen and canned Pleurotus ostreatus mushroom,” Food Chemistry, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 936–943, 2011.

A. A. Akindahunsi and F. L. Oyetayo, “Nutrient and antinutrient distribution of edible mushroom, Pleurotus tuber-regium (fries) singer,” LWT: Food Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 548–553, 2006.

O. J. Owen, E. M. Ngodigha, and A. O. Amakiri, “Proximate composition of heat treated poultry litter (layers),” International Journal of Poultry Science, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1033–1035, 2008.