Conference Papers in Science

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 812627, 4 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/812627

Conference Paper

Effect of MgO and V₂O₅ Catalyst on the Sensing Behaviour of Tin Oxide Thin Film for SO₂ Gas

Punit Tyagi,¹ Anjali Sharma,¹ Monika Tomar,² and Vinay Gupta¹

¹Department of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India

²Physics Department, Miranda House, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India

Received 8 February 2014; Accepted 10 March 2014; Published 2 April 2014

Academic Editors: P. Mandal, R. K. Shivpuri, and G. N. Tiwari

This Conference Paper is based on a presentation given by Punit Tyagi at “National Conference on Advances in Materials Science for Energy Applications” at “National Conference on Advances in Materials Science for Energy Applications” held from 9 January 2014 to 10 January 2014 in Dehradun, India.

Copyright © 2014 Punit Tyagi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The present work shows the SO₂ gas sensing property of SnO₂ thin film based sensor prepared by using RF sputtering technique. Different catalysts (MgO and V₂O₅) in form of nanoclusters having diameter of 600 μm have been loaded on SnO₂ surface to detect SO₂ gas. The sensing response of all these films towards SO₂ is monitored. Microstructural studies have been carried out using XRD and UV-Visible Spectrophotometer and a good correlation has been found between the microstructural and gas sensing properties of these deposited samples. Both catalysts when incorporated with SnO₂ film show high selectivity towards SO₂ gas at lower operating temperature. MgO gives a sensitivity of 317% at an operating temperature of 280°C towards 500 ppm of SO₂ gas whereas V₂O₅ catalyst gives a sensitivity of 166% at 280°C for the same amount of gas.

1. Introduction

Recently, substantial interest has arisen in terms of protecting the environment from various air pollutants generated by combustion exhausts. SO₂ is one of the most hazardous atmospheric pollutants because it directly contributes to acid rain. Several studies have shown that repeated exposure to low levels of SO₂ (<5 ppm) can cause permanent pulmonary impairment [1]. The long-term and short-term exposure limits for SO₂ gas are 2 ppm and 5 ppm, respectively. Therefore, the development of an efficient SO₂ gas sensor for environmental monitoring has become a necessary task.

There are various techniques for determining the SO₂ gas concentration in the atmosphere such as ion chromatography [2], Fourier transform infrared spectrometry [3], optical fiber sensors [4], SAW gas sensors [5], conductometry [6], and electrochemical methods [7]. Amongst all the techniques, conductometric sensors are fast, highly sensitive, reproducible, of low cost, and convenient.

Semiconducting tin oxide (SnO₂) based conductometric gas sensors have received much attention for more than four decades due to their suitable physical-chemical properties and possibility to detect wide variety of gases with high response [8–11]. SnO₂ is naturally nonstoichiometric having a rutile phase that eases the adsorption of oxygen on its surface and thus it is highly sensitive towards many toxic and harmful gases [10, 11]. The main problem with the pure SnO₂ thin film based gas sensors is their poor selectivity and high operating temperatures that can be improved to a great extent by using specific catalysts [12, 13].

The aim of this study is to develop a SnO₂ thin film based SO₂ gas sensor with MgO and V₂O₅ catalysts having efficient response characteristics.

2. Experimental

SnO₂ thin films of 90 nm thickness were deposited using RF diode sputtering technique using a metal Sn target (99.999% pure) in a reactive ambient of Ar and O₂ gas mixture as optimized in our previous work [14]. The sensing response characteristics of SnO₂ thin films were studied using Interdigital Electrodes (IDEs) of platinum (Pt) as shown in Figure 1. The sensor fabrication details are given in our previous report [14]. For the enhanced and selective gas sensing response characteristics, nanoclusters of MgO and V₂O₅ of 10 nm thickness and 600 μm diameter were dispersed uniformly over the surface of SnO₂ thin film by pulsed laser deposition technique (PLD) using a fourth harmonic ( nm) of Nd:YAG laser with fluence 1.5 J/cm² using a shadow mask. Ceramic targets of MgO and V₂O₅ of diameter were used for deposition using PLD. The as-grown sensing elements (MgO/SnO₂ and V₂O₅/SnO₂) were annealed at 300°C in air for 3 h to stabilize the sensor.

Figure 1: Cross-sectional view of the SnO₂ thin film sensor with nanoclusters of catalysts on Pt IDEs.

Thickness and surface roughness of deposited thin films were measured using a (Veeco Dektak 150) surface profiler. Crystalline structure of SnO₂ thin films was studied using Bragg-Brentano () scan of an X-ray diffractometer (Bruker D8 Discover) using the CuK source ( nm). A double beam UV-Visible Spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, Lambda 35) was used to study the optical properties of SnO₂ thin films.

A specially designed gas sensor test rig (GSTR) has been used to study the gas sensing response characteristics of the sensing layer for SO₂ gas. The sensor was placed on a temperature controlled heating block inside the glass test chamber to measure the sensor response as a function of temperature (100 to 300°C). At each temperature, the sensor was first stabilized in air to obtain a stable resistance value. Target gas (SO₂) of specific concentration (500 ppm) was introduced into the test chamber and changes in the sensor resistance were recorded after every second using a data acquisition system consisting of a digital multimeter (model: Keithley 2700) interfaced with a computer. SO₂ is a reducing gas and the sensor response is defined as

where and are the resistance of the sensor element in the presence of atmospheric air and resistance of target SO₂ gas, respectively.

3. Results and Discussions

Figure 2 shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the SnO₂ sensor structure. The diffraction peaks observed at , 33.8°, and 51.8° can be assigned to (110), (101), and (211) planes of the rutile structure of SnO₂, respectively [15]. The observed XRD peaks are found to be broad indicating that the particles are of small size. No peaks corresponding to any secondary phase due to MgO and V₂O₅ have been observed in the XRD spectra which may be attributed to the small thickness of the nanoclusters of the catalysts. The crystallite size was estimated by fitting the width of dominant (101) diffraction peak using Scherrer’s formula and is found to be 8 nm.

Figure 2: X-ray diffraction pattern of SnO₂ sensor structure.

Figure 3 shows the transmittance spectra of the SnO₂ thin film. The films exhibit a high transmission (>80%) in the visible region and show a sharp fundamental absorption edge at around 340 nm. The value of optical band gap was estimated from the Tauc plot and is found to be 3.9 eV which matches very well the reported value [16].

Figure 3: Transmittance spectra of SnO₂ film deposited on glass substrate. Inset: Tauc plot for the SnO₂ thin film.

Figure 4 shows the sensing response of bare SnO₂ film and SnO₂ film having MgO and V₂O₅ as catalysts. Bare SnO₂ thin film based sensor showed no response whereas sensors having MgO and V₂O₅ catalysts are showing a response of 3.17 and 1.66, respectively. Table 1 shows the sensor response (%), response time, and recovery time of the prepared samples at their operating temperature (280°C). It can be seen from Table 1 that the sensor response (%) is low for SnO₂ thin film and gets improved with V₂O₅ as a catalyst and the maximum value of response (%) is found for the SnO₂ with MgO thin film as catalyst with a response time and recovery time of 59 s and 52 s, respectively. MgO and V₂O₅ doped SnO₂ sensors for sensing SO₂ gas have already been reported by Lee et al. [13]. However, the sensing response is reported to be poor (44%) at a high operating temperature (400°C) towards 1 ppm of SO₂ gas. Since gas sensing is a surface phenomenon, the incorporation of catalyst/modifier in the form of nanoclusters onto the surface of SnO₂ thin film is proved to give enhanced sensing response of 317% and 166% at 280°C towards 500 ppm SO₂ gas.

Table 1: Sensing response characteristics of the prepared sensors at an operating temperature of 280°C.

Serial number
Sample
Response (%)
Response time (s)
Recovery time (s)

1
SnO₂
107
—
—

2
SnO₂ + V₂O₅
166
90
43

3
SnO₂ + MgO
317
59
52

Figure 4: Sensing response of SnO₂ thin film, SnO₂ thin film having V₂O₅ catalyst, and SnO₂ thin film having MgO catalyst as a function of temperature.

4. Conclusion

SnO₂ thin films of desired morphology and higher electrical resistance have been deposited by RF sputtering for efficient detection of SO₂ gas. SnO₂ film with MgO catalyst exhibits enhanced sensor response of 317% with moderate response time of 59 s and recovery time of 52 s at an operating temperature of 280°C. The sensor response and recovery time are governed by the adsorption and desorption of SO₂ gas molecules at the sensor surface. The formation of SnO₂ thin film with desired surface morphology having moderate porosity and appropriate catalysts results in an enhanced sensing response towards SO₂ gas (500 ppm) at a low operating temperature of 280°C.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful for the Department of Science and Technology (DST), GAIL India Ltd. and National Program on Micro and Smart Systems (NPMASS) for the financial support to carry out this work.

References

http://avogadro.chem.iastate.edu/MSDS/sulfur_dioxide.pdf

M. Nonomuraac and T. Hobob, “Simultaneous determination of sulphur oxides, nitrogen oxides and hydrogen chloride in flue gas by means of an automated ion chromatographic system,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 804, pp. 151–155, 1998.

F. W. Koehler, G. W. Small, R. J. Combs, R. B. Knapp, and R. T. Kroutil, “Automated detection of sulfur dioxide in stack emissions by passive Fourier transform infrared spectrometry,” Vibrational Spectroscopy, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 97–107, 2001.

H. Y. Xu, K. M. Wang, D. N. Wang, and Q. C. Li, “Studies on a fiber optical sensor for sulfur dioxide with a high sensitivity,” Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1401–1404, 1998.

S. Qin, Z. Wu, Z. Tang, Y. Song, F. Zeng, and D. Zhao, “Sensitivity to SO2 of the SAW gas sensor with triethanolamine modified with boric acid,” Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 240–242, 2000.

P. K. Dasgupta and S. Kar, “Measurement of gases by a suppressed conductometric capillary electrophoresis separation system,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 67, no. 21, pp. 3853–3860, 1995.

J. F. Currie, A. Essalik, and J.-C. Marusic, “Micromachined thin film solid state electrochemical CO₂, NO₂ and SO₂ gas sensors,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 235–241, 1999.

A. Chowdhuri, V. Gupta, and K. Sreenivas, “Fast response H₂S gas sensing characteristics with ultra-thin CuO islands on sputtered SnO₂,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 93, no. 1-3, pp. 572–579, 2003.

D. Haridas, K. Sreenivas, and V. Gupta, “Improved response characteristics of SnO₂ thin film loaded with nanoscale catalysts for LPG detection,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 270–275, 2008.

Md. Shahabuddin, A. Sharma, J. Kumar, M. Tomar, A. Umar, and V. Gupta, “Metal clusters activated SnO₂ thin film for low level detection of NH₃ gas,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 194, pp. 410–418, 2014.

T. Zhanga, L. Liua, Q. Qia, S. Li, and G. Lua, “Development of microstructure In/Pd-doped SnO₂ sensor for low-level CO detection,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 287–291, 2009.

X. Liang, T. Zhong, B. Quan, B. Wang, and H. Guan, “Solid-state potentiometric SO₂ sensor combining NASICON with V₂O₅-doped TiO₂ electrode,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2008.

S. C. Lee, B. W. Hwang, S. J. Lee et al., “A novel tin oxide-based recoverable thick film SO₂ gas sensor promoted with magnesium and vanadium oxides,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 1328–1334, 2011.

P. Tyagi, A. Sharma, M. Tomar, and V. Gupta, “Pd nanoclusters integrated SnO₂ thin film sensor for low temperature detection of SO₂ gas with enhanced response,” Chemical Sensors, vol. 4, article 18, 2014.

M. Verma and V. Gupta, “A highly sensitive SnO₂-CuO multilayered sensor structure for detection of H₂S gas,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 166-167, pp. 378–385, 2012.

T. J. Stanimirova, P. A. Atanasov, I. G. Dimitrov, and A. O. Dikovska, “Investigation on the structural and optical properties of tin oxide films grown by pulsed laser deposition,” Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1335–1340, 2005.