ISRN Pharmacology

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 943523, 6 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/943523

Research Article

Antioxidant Effects of Bovine Lactoferrin on Dexamethasone-Induced Hypertension in Rat

Leila Safaeian and Hadi Zabolian

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 81746-73461, Iran

Received 8 September 2013; Accepted 19 November 2013; Published 22 January 2014

Academic Editors: C. R. Triggle, S. Tsuruoka, and M. van den Buuse

Copyright © 2014 Leila Safaeian and Hadi Zabolian. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Dexamethasone- (Dex-) induced hypertension is associated with enhanced oxidative stress. Lactoferrin (LF) is an iron-binding glycoprotein with antihypertensive properties. In this study, we investigated the effect of chronic administration of LF on oxidative stress and hypertension upon Dex administration. Male Wistar rats were treated by Dex (30 μg/kg/day subcutaneously) or saline for 14 days. Oral bovine LF (30, 100, 300 mg/kg) was given from day 8 to 14 in a reversal study. In a prevention study, rats received 4 days of LF treatment followed by Dex and continued during the test period. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured using tail-cuff method. Thymus weight was used as a marker of glucocorticoid activity. Plasma hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) concentration and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) value were determined. Dexamethasone significantly increased SBP and plasma H₂O₂ level and decreased thymus and body weights. LF lowered and dose dependently prevented Dex-induced hypertension. LF prevented body weight loss and significantly reduced the elevated plasma H₂O₂ and increased FRAP values. Chronic administration of LF strongly reduced the blood pressure and production of ROS and improved antioxidant capacity in Dex-induced hypertension, suggesting the role of inhibition of oxidative stress as another mechanism of antihypertensive action of LF.

1. Introduction

Chronic administration of glucocorticoid, especially at supraphysiological doses, leads to elevated systolic blood pressure, in man and animals [1]. Increased vascular sensitivity to glucocorticoids has been also demonstrated in patients with essential hypertension [2]. Dexamethasone- (Dex-) induced hypertension is associated with decreased antioxidant levels, enhanced oxidative stress and reduced nitric oxide (NO) level [3, 4]. Overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) occurs in this model of hypertension like many other forms of hypertension. Interaction between ROS and NO leads to reduced NO availability and vasoconstriction [5]. An increasing body of evidence has shown the role of antioxidants in preventing increased oxidative stress and blood pressure in Dex-induced hypertension [6–8].

Lactoferrin (LF) is a multifunctional iron-binding glycoprotein. Different biological fluids especially milk and also neutrophilic granules contain LF [9]. LF receptors are found in various cell types such as lymphocytes, platelets, macrophages, dopaminergic neurons, megacaryocytes, and endothelial cells. Some of these receptors are involved in LF uptake. In the cerebral endothelial cells, LF is transported through a receptor-mediated process without any intraendothelial degradation [10].

LF acts as the first-line defense against bacterial, fungal, and viral infections [11]. It has anti-inflammatory effect and its production is increased during inflammatory circumstances [12].

LF is a regulator of organ morphogenesis and promotes wound healing and bone growth. It has enzymatic activities in some reactions and also some anticancer activities [13].

LF has been identified as an antioxidant protein with ability to increase antioxidant capacity and decrease ROS formation [14–16]. Recently, some studies have demonstrated antihypertensive effects of this food-derived peptide and its hydrolysate in normal and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) [17, 18]. The NO-dependent vasodilation, inhibition of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) activity, and inhibition of endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE) activity have been suggested as the mechanisms responsible for antihypertensive effects of LF [19–21].

The present study aimed to evaluate blood pressure lowering effects of chronic LF in Dex-induced hypertension and to determine the role of inhibition of oxidative stress as another probable mechanism of action of LF in prevention of hypertension.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Animals

Male Wistar rats (200–230 g) were obtained from the animal house of the School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. They were kept in standard laboratory conditions with free access to food and water. Rats were acclimated to the laboratory conditions for at least one week before the experiments. Animals were weighed on alternate days. All experiments were performed according to the internationally accepted guidelines for laboratory animal use and care.

2.2. Chemicals

Bovine lactoferrin (Sigma-Aldrich Co., USA), dexamethasone (Raha Pharmaceutical Co., Iran) and captopril (Tehran Darou, Iran), were used in this study. Plasma lipid hydroperoxides measurement and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay were performed using standard assay kits (East Sage Research Co., Iran).

2.3. Experimental Protocol

Animals were treated by subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of Dex (30 μg/kg/day) for induction of hypertension as the Dex control group or saline (1 mL/kg) as the saline control group for 14 days [22]. In a prevention study, rats received oral LF (30, 100, 300 mg/kg) or captopril treatment (40 mg/kg; a known angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, as the positive control) using an intragastric tube for 4 days followed by Dex administration and continued during the test period (14 days). In the reversal study, LF or captopril was administered from day 8 to day 14. Six animals were used in each group. At the end of the experiment, all groups of animals were sacrificed under ether anesthesia. Blood samples were collected into heparinized tubes and plasma was separated. The thymus gland was also isolated.

2.4. Measurement of Systolic Blood Pressure

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured every week using noninvasive tail-cuff method (AD Instrument PowerLab Data Acquisition System, Australia) in conscious rats. The animals were individually restrained in a clear acrylic restrainer at an ambient temperature of 37-38°C for 15 min. Five blood pressure values were recorded for each rat and the average of them was taken as the SBP. To assure the reliability of the measurements, a training period of one week was established before the experiment time for adaptation of rats to the method.

2.5. Measurement of Thymus Weight

The thymus gland was weighed and expressed as milligrams per 100 g body weight. The thymus weightwas used as a marker of glucocorticoid activity [23].

2.6. Measurement of Plasma Hydrogen Peroxide Concentration

Plasma hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) concentration was measured based on the ferrous ion oxidation by xylenol orange (FOX) assay using a standard assay kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol [24]. Briefly, FOX reagent was mixed with plasma samples and incubated for 30 min in 37°C. The absorbance of colored samples was read at 540 nm with ELISA/spectrophotometric reader. Plasma H₂O₂ concentration was calculated against the hydrogen peroxide standard curve absorption values.

2.7. Plasma Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay

The antioxidant capacity of plasma samples was determined by FRAP assay based on the reduction of ferric-tripyridyltriazine complex to ferrous form using a standard assay kit [25]. Briefly, the FRAP reagent was added to plasma samples and incubated for 40 min in 40°C. The absorbance of colored samples was read at 570 nm using an ELISA/spectrophotometric reader. The values were calculated against the standard curve of FeSO₄.7H₂O concentration and absorption values were expressed as micromole of ferrous ion equivalents per liter.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was made by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey post hoc test using SPSS 16.0 software and GraphPad-Prism 5 software. value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Lactoferrin on Blood Pressure

Dexamethasone significantly increased SBP from 118.9 ± 4.7 to 140.44 ± 10.3 mmHg on day 7 () and to 150 ± 7.4 mmHg on day 14 () in comparison with saline control group (116.6 ± 2.4 mmHg). The oral administration of LF (30–300 mg/kg) lowered and dose dependently prevented Dex-induced hypertension in reversal and prevention studies (Figures 1 and 2).

Figure 1: Effects of oral lactoferrin (30–300 mg/kg) and captopril (40 mg/kg) on systolic blood pressure on Dex-induced hypertension in reversal groups. Values are means ± SEM for six rats. As compared to Dex control group, **: , and ***: . As compared to saline control group, ###: .

Figure 2: Effects of oral lactoferrin (30–300 mg/kg) and captopril (40 mg/kg) on systolic blood pressure on Dex-induced hypertension in prevention groups. Values are means ± SEM for six rats. As compared to Dex control group, *: , ***: . As compared to saline control group, ###: .

3.2. Effect of Lactoferrin on Body Weight

The body weight significantly decreased in Dex-induced hypertensive rats when compared to saline control group (). These changes were modified by LF administration (300 mg/kg) but not by captopril (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Effects of oral lactoferrin (300 mg/kg) and captopril (40 mg/kg) on body weight on Dex-induced hypertension. Values are means ± SEM for six rats. As compared to Dex control group, *: , **: , and ***: . As compared to saline control group, #: , ##: , and ###: .

3.3. Effect of Lactoferrin on Thymus Weight

Dex significantly decreased thymus weight () but LF and captopril had no effect on it (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Effects of oral lactoferrin (300 mg/kg) and captopril (40 mg/kg) on thymus weight on Dex-induced hypertension. Values are means for six rats.

3.4. Effect of Lactoferrin on Plasma H₂O₂ Concentration

Dex treatment significantly raised the level of plasma H₂O₂when compared with saline control rats (). LF administration significantly () prevented the rise in H₂O₂ concentration at all doses in prevention study and reduced the elevated plasma H₂O₂ concentration at dose of 300 mg/kg in reversal study (). Administration of captopril also prevented and reversed the elevated plasma H₂O₂ concentration in Dex-induced hypertensive rats (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Effects of oral lactoferrin (30–300 mg/kg) and captopril (40 mg/kg) on plasma H₂O₂ concentration on Dex-induced hypertension in prevention (Prev) and reversal (Rev) groups. Values are means ± SEM for six rats. As compared to Dex control group, *: , **: and ***: . As compared to saline control group, ##: , ###: .

3.5. Effect of Lactoferrin on FRAP Assay

Dex-induced hypertensive rats exhibited significant increase in the plasma FRAP values compared with saline control rats (). LF administrations also significantly increased FRAP values in Dex-induced hypertensive group at all doses of prevention study () and at doses 100 and 300 mg/kg of reversal study (). In the captopril prevention study, FRAP values were also significantly increased (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Effects of oral lactoferrin (30–300 mg/kg) and captopril (40 mg/kg) on plasma FRAP value on Dex-induced hypertension in prevention (prev.) and reversal (rev.) groups. Values are means ± SEM for six rats. As compared to Dex control group, *: . As compared to saline control group, #: , ##: , and ###: .

4. Discussion

The results of this study showed antihypertensive effect of LF in Dex-induced hypertension. LF treatment dose dependently prevented and reversed a rise in SBP upon Dex administration. These LF effects were obtained in spite of the fact that dose of Dex used in the current study was 3-fold higher than that of dose used in most studies (10 μg/kg/day) [8].

The exact mechanism of Dex-induced hypertension has not been fully understood. The role of augmented vascular pressor responsiveness, increased vasoconstrictor system activity including renin-angiotensin, endothelin, and sympathetic system, deficiency in vasodilators such as NO and prostanoids, hemodynamic alterations, and oxidative stress have been proposed as the mechanisms of Dex in induction of elevated blood pressure [26]. Structural, functional, and mechanical disruption in vessels have important role in Dex hypertensive effect. Dex results in increased sensitivity of vascular smooth muscles to vasoconstrictors and also increased vasoconstrictor release including angiotensin II, endothelin, and catecholamines [26, 27].

NO deficiency occurs during Dex treatment by downregulation of endothelial NO synthase expression and also through increased NO removal by oxidative stress [28]. Dex enhances superoxide free radical production through NAPDH oxidase pathway in vasculature when given chronically. It also causes significant alterations in antioxidant status [4]. Some antioxidants such as tempol, apocynin, and N-acetylcysteine have been shown to prevent Dex-induced hypertension [6, 26, 29].

LF as a food-derived peptide is believed to be safer than the drugs currently used for hypertension treatment [30]. Previous studies have reported blood pressure lowering effects of LF [19–21]. LF may cross and be internalized via a specific low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein in some capillary endothelial cells and it acts as an antioxidant factor [10]. The antihypertensive effects of LF may be attributed to the ACE and ECE inhibitor action and also endothelium-dependent relaxant action of LF [19–21]. It has been suggested that the vasodilatory action of LF is strongly mediated by NO production because of complete blockade of this effect by a NO synthase inhibitor [19]. Ikeda and coworkers have reported significant phosphorylation of Src, Akt, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) after treatment with LF suggesting a Src Akt eNOS-dependent pathway in promotion of vascular endothelial cell function by LF [31].

Furthermore, our results exhibited antioxidant effect of LF in Dex-induced hypertension. Hypertension of Dex was accompanied by increased plasma hydrogen peroxide level. LF administration dose dependently prevented and reversed H₂O₂ overproduction during Dex injection. Our finding showed significant increases in plasma ferric reducing antioxidant power upon Dex administration. It has been reported that glucocorticoids may activate the antioxidant enzymes in some tissues due to the state of oxidative stress and in a tissue specific manner [4]. However, the antioxidant capacity was higher in LF pretreated rats than that of rats treated with Dex alone. The potent antioxidant action of LF has been reported in other studies. Two weeks LF supplementation has been able to increase the hydrophilic antioxidant capacity in healthy humans [14]. LF has protective effect on pathological circumstances associated with iron-catalysed ROS based on its metal ions-binding capacity [32]. It has been suggested that LF contributes in oxidoreductive reactions at the cell membrane. An antioxidant effect of LF on erythrocytes through inhibition of lipid peroxidation and hemolysis has been reported [15]. LF is an important specialized iron scavenger and its antioxidant activity is most likely linked to its ability to bind ferrous and ferric ions. Thus, LF may inhibit the iron-catalyzed formation of hydroxyl radicals through Fenton reaction—an important source of ROS [11, 33]. Overproduction of ROS and their interaction with NO may contribute to reduction of NO bioavailability and therefore antioxidant effect of LF would prevent NO deficiency.

The result of this investigation suggested the antioxidant effect as another mechanism responsible for antihypertensive effects of LF. Our results showed effectiveness of LF in both prevention and reversal studies. Although some antioxidants such as tempol have been effective only in the prevention study LF with potent antioxidant effect could normalize the SBP even in Dex-induced hypertensive rats [6].

Metabolic consequences such as muscle and fat catabolism result in decreasing the rate of body weight gain during Dex administration. LF could prevent the body weight loss effect of Dex. Wakabayashi et al. have also reported protective effect of LF in preventing weight loss during infection with herpes simplex virus type 1 in mice. This effect of LF may be mediated through immune modulation and inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines production [34].

In conclusion, chronic LF treatment strongly reduced production of ROS and improved antioxidant capacity and reduced SBP in Dex-induced hypertension. These findings confirm the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of Dex-induced hypertension and provide evidence that antioxidant effect may play a role in the antihypertensive effect of LF. With regard to high antihypertensive activity with safety, LF could be suggested for clinical trial studies for prevention and/or treatment of hypertension.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

This study was financially supported by research Project no. 391405 from Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

References

S. L. H. Ong and J. A. Whitworth, “How do glucocorticoids cause hypertension: role of nitric oxide deficiency, oxidative stress, and eicosanoids,” Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 393–407, 2011.

B. R. Walker, R. Best, C. H. L. Shackleton, P. L. Padfield, and C. R. W. Edwards, “Increased vasoconstrictor sensitivity to glucocorticoids in essential hypertension,” Hypertension, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 190–196, 1996.

T. Iuchi, M. Akaike, T. Mitsui et al., “Glucocorticoid excess induces superoxide production in vascular endothelial cells and elicits vascular endothelial dysfunction,” Circulation Research, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 81–87, 2003.

S. Rajashree and R. Puvanakrishnan, “Dexamethasone induced alterations in enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidant status in heart and kidney of rats,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 181, no. 1-2, pp. 77–85, 1998.

P. Pacher, J. S. Beckman, and L. Liaudet, “Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 315–424, 2007.

Y. Zhang, K. D. Croft, T. A. Mori, C. G. Schyvens, K. U. S. McKenzie, and J. A. Whitworth, “The antioxidant tempol prevents and partially reverses dexamethasone-induced hypertension in the rat,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 260–265, 2004.

S. S. Bachhav, S. D. Patil, M. S. Bhutada, and S. J. Surana, “Oleanolic acid prevents glucocorticoid-induced hypertension in rats,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1435–1439, 2011.

C. K. Mondo, W.-S. Yang, N. Zhang, and T.-G. Huang, “Anti-oxidant effects of atorvastatin in dexamethasone-induced hypertension in the rat,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1029–1034, 2006.

T. Tsuchiya, T. Takeuchi, K.-I. Hayashida, H. Shimizu, K. Ando, and E. Harada, “Milk-derived lactoferrin may block tolerance to morphine analgesia,” Brain Research, vol. 1068, no. 1, pp. 102–108, 2006.

C. Fillebeen, L. Descamps, M.-P. Dehouck et al., “Receptor-mediated transcytosis of lactoferrin through the blood-brain barrier,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 11, pp. 7011–7017, 1999.

J. K. Actor, S.-A. Hwang, and M. L. Kruzel, “Lactoferrin as a natural immune modulator,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 15, no. 17, pp. 1956–1973, 2009.

S. Baveye, E. Elass, J. Mazurier, G. Spik, and D. Legrand, “Lactoferrin: a multifunctional glycoprotein involved in the modulation of the inflammatory process,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 281–286, 1999.

S. A. González-Chávez, S. Arévalo-Gallegos, and Q. Rascón-Cruz, “Lactoferrin: structure, function and applications,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 301.e1–301.e8, 2009.

A. M. Mulder, P. A. Connellan, C. J. Oliver, C. A. Morris, and L. M. Stevenson, “Bovine lactoferrin supplementation supports immune and antioxidant status in healthy human males,” Nutrition Research, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 583–589, 2008.

A. Maneva, B. Taleva, and L. Maneva, “Lactoferrin-protector against oxidative stress and regulator of glycolysis in human erythrocytes,” Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung C, vol. 58, no. 3-4, pp. 256–262, 2003.

M. S. Cohen, J. Mao, G. T. Rasmussen, J. S. Serody, and B. E. Britigan, “Interaction of lactoferrin and lipopolysaccharide (LPS): effects on the antioxidant property of lactoferrin and the ability of LPS to prime human neutrophils for enhanced superoxide formation,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 166, no. 6, pp. 1375–1378, 1992.

P. Ruiz-Giménez, A. Ibáñez, J. B. Salom, et al., “Antihypertensive properties of lactoferricin B-derived peptides,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 6721–6727, 2010.

P. Ruiz-Giménez, J. B. Salom, J. F. Marcos et al., “Antihypertensive effect of a bovine lactoferrin pepsin hydrolysate: identification of novel active peptides,” Food Chemistry, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 266–273, 2012.

K.-I. Hayashida, T. Takeuchi, T. Ozaki et al., “Bovine lactoferrin has a nitric oxide-dependent hypotensive effect in rats,” American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 286, no. 2, pp. R359–R365, 2004.

P. Ruiz-Giménez, M. C. Burguete, M. Castelló-Ruiz et al., “Bovine lactoferrin pepsin hydrolysate exerts inhibitory effect on angiotensin I-converting enzyme-dependent vasoconstriction,” International Dairy Journal, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1212–1215, 2007.

R. Fernández-Musoles, J. J. López-Díez, G. Torregrosa et al., “Lactoferricin B-derived peptides with inhibitory effects on ECE-dependent vasoconstriction,” Peptides, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1926–1933, 2010.

Y. Zhang, J. H. Y. Wu, J. J. Vickers et al., “The role of 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid in adrenocorticotrophic hormone and dexamethasone-induced hypertension,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1609–1616, 2009.

S. L. H. Ong, J. J. Vickers, Y. Zhang, K. U. S. McKenzie, C. E. Walsh, and J. A. Whitworth, “Role of xanthine oxidase in dexamethasone-induced hypertension in rats,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 34, no. 5-6, pp. 517–519, 2007.

S. P. Wolff, “Ferrous ion oxidation in presence of ferric ion indicator xylenol orange for measurement of hydroperoxides,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 233, pp. 182–189, 1994.

K. Thaipong, U. Boonprakob, K. Crosby, L. Cisneros-Zevallos, and D. Hawkins Byrne, “Comparison of ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC assays for estimating antioxidant activity from guava fruit extracts,” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, vol. 19, no. 6-7, pp. 669–675, 2006.

S. L. H. Ong, Y. Zhang, and J. A. Whitworth, “Mechanisms of dexamethasone-induced hypertension,” Current Hypertension Reviews, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 61–74, 2009.

M. Pirpiris, K. Sudhir, S. Yeung, G. Jennings, and J. A. Whitworth, “Pressor responsiveness in corticosteroid-induced hypertension in humans,” Hypertension, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 567–574, 1992.

J. A. Whitworth, C. G. Schyvens, Y. Zhang, M. C. Andrews, G. J. Mangos, and J. J. Kelly, “The nitric oxide system in glucocorticoid-induced hypertension,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1035–1043, 2002.

L. Hu, Y. Zhang, P. S. Lim et al., “Apocynin but not L-arginine prevents and reverses dexamethasone-induced hypertension in the rat,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 413–418, 2006.

A. Pihlanto-Leppälä, P. Koskinen, K. Phlola, T. Tupasela, and H. Korhonen, “Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory properties of whey protein digests: concentration and characterization of active peptides,” Journal of Dairy Research, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 53–64, 2000.

Y. Ikeda, S. Tajima, Y. Izawa-Ishizawa, et al., “Bovine milk-derived lactoferrin exerts proangiogenic effects in an Src-Akt-eNOS-dependent manner in response to ischemia,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 423–429, 2013.

P. Mladenka, V. Semecky, Z. Bobrovova, et al., “The effects of lactoferrin in a rat model of catecholamine cardiotoxicity,” Biometals, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 353–361, 2009.

A. Lawen and J. R. Darius, “Lane mammalian iron homeostasis in health and disease: uptake, storage, transport, and molecular mechanisms of action,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 18, no. 18, pp. 2473–2507, 2013.

H. Wakabayashi, M. Kurokawa, K. Shin, S. Teraguchi, Y. Tamura, and K. Shiraki, “Oral lactoferrin prevents body weight loss and increases cytokine responses during herpes simplex virus type 1 infection of mice,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 537–544, 2004.