Journal of Food Processing
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 425121, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/425121

Research Article

Technological Properties of Wheat/Trifoliate Yam (Dioscorea dumetorum) Hardened Tubers Composite Flours

Véronique Josette Essa’a, Roger M. Mbanga Baleba, and Gabriel Nama Medoua

Centre for Food and Nutrition Research, IMPM, P.O. Box 6163, Yaoundé, Cameroon

Received 6 August 2015; Revised 11 December 2015; Accepted 15 December 2015

Academic Editor: Ma Murcia

Copyright © 2015 Véronique Josette Essa’a et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The ability of trifoliate hardened-yam flours to partially substitute wheat flour in food formulations was assessed. Three varieties of hardened-yam flour were incorporated in wheat flour in proportions of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50% (w/w). Samples were evaluated for protein content, Zeleny sedimentation index, Hagberg falling number, functional properties (WAC, WSI, and OAC), and some rheological properties including dough rupture pressure (), extensibility (), stability (), and deformation energy (). Results showed that trifoliate hardened-yam flours do not have acceptable baking properties as pictured by the low Zeleny sedimentation index and the low Hagberg falling number. Protein quality (Zeleny index, 31) of wheat flour helped to compensate gluten deficit of yam flours, but the amylasic activity determined by the Hagberg falling number could not be adjusted, which resulted in a loss of extensibility () of the paste at 10% substitution. Multivariate analysis of experimental data regrouped wheat flour and all wheat/hardened-yam treated with kanwa composite flours in one homogeneous cluster. Although wheat/hardened-yam treated with kanwa composite flours had physicochemical and functional properties similar to wheat, the inadequate diastasic activity makes them inappropriate for bread making, marking the strongest influence of that parameter.

1. Introduction

Trifoliate yam (Dioscorea dumetorum) tubers are good source of nutrients and energy [1]. Their storage under tropical ambient conditions makes them susceptible to a hardening phenomenon characterised by loss of the ability to soften during cooking [2, 3]. In an attempt to add more value to D. dumetorum as an important source of food and energy, Medoua et al. [4, 5] developed schemes for processing of its hardened tubers into flours and suggested that these flours can be used in bakery.

Composite flour can be defined as a mixture of flours, starches, and other ingredients intended to replace wheat flour totally or partially in bakery and pastry products [6]. Composite flour has several advantages for developing countries including the reduction of wheat flour importation and promotion of high-yielding, native plant species [7]. In this regard, several developing countries have initiated programmes to evaluate the feasibility of alternative locally available flours as a substitute for wheat flour [8] and several authors successfully developed composite flours where wheat flour is partially replaced by cassava [9], taro [10], banana [11], yam [12], sorghum [8], soybean [13], cocoyam [14], chickpea [15], lupin [16], sweet potato [17], or maize [18].

To the best of our knowledge, no study has been performed so far to assess the aptitude of trifoliate hardened-yam to partially substitute wheat flour in food formulation. The present study was therefore designed to evaluate the aptitude to develop trifoliate hardened-yam-wheat composite flours. Generally, composite flours are developed to be used in bakery and in pastry-making and are suitable to produce bread, biscuits, noodles, and various cakes. Evaluating technological value of composite flour can be done either by direct appreciation, corresponding to the implementation of a production test at a reduced scale, or by indirect appreciation, corresponding to chemical, functional, and rheological analysis. This last alternative was chosen in the present study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Trifoliate yam, D. dumetorum cv., yellow tubers were harvested at maturity in a farm at Esse in the Centre Region of Cameroon. They were immediately transported to the laboratory in Yaoundé and stored under prevailing tropical ambient conditions (19–28°C, 60–85% RH) for 14 days. Hardening of stored tubers was characterised by a rough and fluffy surface of peeled tubers as opposed to the smooth and moist surface of freshly harvested ones. After storage, the samples of hardened tubers were thoroughly washed with water, peeled, chopped into chips of 1 cm thickness, and divided in three lots. Samples of the first lot were not pretreated, samples of the second lot were pretreated by fermenting the yam slices during 7 days in a closed system as described by Medoua et al. [5], and samples of the third lot were pretreated by soaking yam slices in a solution of 1% kanwa alkaline salt for 16 h as described by Medoua et al. [4]. The samples of each lot were, respectively, dried at 40°C in a ventilated oven for 24 h and the dried samples were ground into flour to pass through a 400 μm sieve.

Commercial wheat flour without additive was used to produce composite flours by incorporating hardened-yam flours into wheat flour at the levels of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50%. The resulting flours were coded as follows:

(i)W: 100% wheat flour,(ii)H10: 90% wheat/10% hardened-yam composite flour,(iii)H20: 80% wheat/20% hardened-yam composite flour,(iv)H30: 70% wheat/30% hardened-yam composite flour,(v)H40: 60% wheat/40% hardened-yam composite flour,(vi)H50: 50% wheat/50% hardened-yam composite flour,(vii)F10: 90% wheat/10% fermented hardened-yam composite flour,(viii)F20: 80% wheat/20% fermented hardened-yam composite flour,(ix)F30: 70% wheat/30% fermented hardened-yam composite flour,(x)F40: 60% wheat/40% fermented hardened-yam composite flour,(xi)F50: 50% wheat/50% fermented hardened-yam composite flour,(xii)K10: 90% wheat/10% hardened-yam treated with kanwa composite flour,(xiii)K20: 80% wheat/20% hardened-yam treated with kanwa composite flour,(xiv)K30: 70% wheat/30% hardened-yam treated with kanwa composite flour,(xv)K40: 60% wheat/40% hardened-yam treated with kanwa composite flour,(xvi)K50: 50% wheat/50% hardened-yam treated with kanwa composite flour.

2.2. Technological Characteristics of Flours

Protein content ( for wheat flour and for composite flours) was determined by the AACC International Approved Method [19]. The moisture and ash contents were, respectively, determined according to the AOAC Official Methods 925.10 and 920.87 [20]. Zeleny sedimentation index and Hagberg falling number were, respectively, determined according to the AACC International Approved Methods [21] and 56-81.03 [22].

2.2.1. Functional Properties

Water absorption capacity and water solubility index were determined as described by Bello et al. [23] and Anderson et al. [24]. Oil absorption capacity was estimated by centrifuging a known quantity of flour saturated with oil as described by Sosulski [25]. The least gelatinisation concentration was estimated according to the method of Coffman and Garcia [26]. The bulk density of the paste obtained after mixing 100 g of flour with a given quantity of water to obtain a water content of 60% was determined according to the method described by Okezie and Bello [27]. Emulsion activity and stability were determined according to the method described by Neto et al. [28]. Flour sample (1 g) was mixed with 3 mL of distilled water and 3 mL of cotton oil in a graduated tube. Then, the mixture was shaken for 10 min in a KS10 agitator and centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 5 min. Emulsion activity was calculated by dividing the volume of the emulsified layer by the volume of total content in the tube. The emulsion stability was determined by heating the emulsion for 30 at 80°C and then cooled and centrifuged again at 2500 rpm for 5 min. The emulsion stability was expressed as the % of emulsifying activity remaining after heating.

2.2.2. Colour Measurement

Colour was measured using a colorimeter (Lovibond RT Colour Measurement Kit V2.28) with an observation window of 10° and D65 light source. The colorimeter was calibrated with a white standard (, , and ) and CIE parameters of each sample were determined on the basis of triplicate measurements.

The colour derivative functions of [] and [] were also calculated.

2.2.3. Rheological Properties

Alveograph characteristics (tenacity , extensibility , stability , and deformation energy ) were determined under conditions of constant dough water content (40%) and mixing time (28 min), according to the AACC International Approved Method [29] using the Alveo-Consistograph (Chopin, Villeneuve-La-Garenne, France) with a built-in diaphragm pump to supply air for inflating the tested dough piece.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

All measurements were carried out in triplicate. Statistical analyses of data were performed using SPSS 10.1 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) and STATISTICA 6 (Data Analysis Software System, StatSoft, Inc., USA). Analysis of variance (ANOVA), Duncan multiple range test, principal component analysis (PCA), and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) were performed. Statistical significance was defined at .

3. Results and Discussion

Table 1 displays some physicochemical properties of wheat and yam flours. It was noted that protein content of yam flours (9.9–8.4 g/100 g) is relatively low compared to wheat flour. Zeleny sedimentation index which defines the capacity of proteins to form aggregate in acid medium (related to its content in glutelin) was low for various yam flours; in all the cases, it was below the minimum acceptable value set at 15 mL (Norm ISO 5529), marking the absence of glutelin in yam flours. The diastasic activity of yam flour was very strong as illustrated by the small values of Hagberg index. This strong diastasic activity led to a maximum starch liquefaction (specially for hardened-yam flour and fermented hardened-yam flour) and a low water retention capacity, which explained why, compare with wheat flour, hardened-yam flours presented a lower viscosity during cooking as pictured by the higher values of least gelatinisation concentration. In general, these results showed that hardened-yam flours do not have acceptable baking properties.

Table 1: Some physicochemical properties of experimental flours.

Flour type

Hardened-yam
Fermented hardened-yam
Hardened-yam treated with kanwa
Wheat

Proteins (% DM)
9.6 ± 0.1
9.9 ± 0.1
8.4 ± 0.1
11.17 ± 0.02

Hagberg falling number (s)
104 ± 2
62 ± 1
287 ± 14
321 ± 1

Zeleny index (mL)
7 ± 0.4
8 ± 0.2
4 ± 0.4
31 ± 0.6

Least gelatinisation concentration
10.5 ± 0.7
13.0 ± 0.0
7.5 ± 0.7
5.5 ± 0.7

Mean ± SD, .

The protein content and the gluten quality (Zeleny index, 31) of wheat flour used in this study could help compensating protein deficit of different yam flours, but the amylasic activity determined by the Hagberg falling number was just at the standard level and could hardly adjust the enzymatic level in composite flours.

Table 2 displays some physico-chemical properties of wheat/hardened-yam composite flours. After incorporation of wheat flour, the baking properties were significantly improved. Zeleny index remained in acceptable level until a substitution rate of 50% for hardened-yam and fermented hardened-yam flours, and 30% for hardened-yam treated with kanwa flour.

Table 2: Physicochemical and functional properties of wheat/hardened-yam composites flours.

Yam
Proteins (%)
Hagberg falling number (s)
Zeleny index (mL)
WSI (%)
WAC (%)
OAC (%)
EA (%)
ES (%)
Density (g/mL)
LGC (%)

Hardened

    0%
11.17 ± 0.02
321 ± 1
31 ± 0.6
11.6 ± 0.1
106.0 ± 0.5
173.1 ± 0.9
46.6 ± 0.6
61.7 ± 0.4
0.66 ± 0.01
5.5 ± 0.7

    10%
11.01 ± 0.02
204 ± 7
25 ± 0.5
18.4 ± 0.6
118.2 ± 0.4
176.1 ± 0.2
46.2 ± 0.7
46.0 ± 1.4
0.66 ± 0.01
6.5 ± 0.7

    20%
10.86 ± 0.02
171 ± 1
23 ± 0.5
19.2 ± 0.2
130.0 ± 1.0
181.2 ± 0.0
44.9 ± 0.4
42.8 ± 1.1
0.63 ± 0.00
7.5 ± 0.7

    30%
10.71 ± 0.01
151 ± 2
21 ± 0.3
20.2 ± 0.1
149.3 ± 2.0
186.2 ± 1.1
41.2 ± 0.7
38.9 ± 2.0
0.59 ± 0.00
8.5 ± 0.7

    40%
10.56 ± 0.01
137 ± 7
19 ± 0.8
20.8 ± 0.8
166.3 ± 7.1
188.6 ± 0.3
38.7 ± 1.1
35.0 ± 2.4
0.56 ± 0.00
9.5 ± 0.7

    50%
10.40 ± 0.01
135 ± 8
17 ± 0.5
21.8 ± 0.2
193.7 ± 4.7
190.7 ± 7.5
35.1 ± 0.3
31.0 ± 1.4
0.55 ± 0.01
10.5 ± 0.7

Hardened-treated with kanwa

    0%
11.17 ± 0.02
321 ± 1
31 ± 0.6
11.6 ± 0.1
106.0 ± 0.5
173.1 ± 0.9
46.6 ± 0.6
61.7 ± 0.4
0.66 ± 0.01
5.5 ± 0.7

    10%
10.90 ± 0.02
307 ± 4
21 ± 0.5
17.7 ± 0.3
123.2 ± 3.5
174.2 ± 3.5
42.6 ± 1.0
55.2 ± 1.7
0.67 ± 0.00
8.0 ± 0.0

    20%
10.63 ± 0.02
303 ± 3
18 ± 1.1
18.3 ± 0.0
135.1 ± 2.6
176.2 ± 3.8
38.9 ± 1.6
53.9 ± 2.7
0.64 ± 0.01
6.5 ± 0.7

    30%
10.36 ± 0.01
301 ± 4
16 ± 1.6
18.8 ± 0.3
155.0 ± 6.2
180.7 ± 0.9
34.7 ± 1.7
55.1 ± 1.6
0.63 ± 0.01
5.5 ± 0.7

    40%
10.10 ± 0.01
302 ± 0
14 ± 0.5
19.3 ± 0.5
178.9 ± 7.0
183.3 ± 0.6
31.3 ± 1.9
55.2 ± 0.7
0.61 ± 0.01
5.5 ± 0.7

    50%
9.83 ± 0.01
308 ± 13
13 ± 0.5
20.1 ± 0.4
211.0 ± 0.0
188.3 ± 1.7
28.4 ± 1.3
54.8 ± 0.2
0.59 ± 0.00
5.5 ± 0.7

Hardened-fermented

    0%
11.17 ± 0.02
321 ± 1
31 ± 0.6
11.6 ± 0.1
106.0 ± 0.5
173.1 ± 0.9
46.6 ± 0.6
61.7 ± 0.4
0.66 ± 0.01
5.5 ± 0.7

    10%
11.05 ± 0.02
129 ± 0
26 ± 0.5
20.0 ± 0.2
120.2 ± 0.2
176.5 ± 11.0
46.5 ± 0.5
49.0 ± 1.3
0.67 ± 0.01
7.5 ± 0.7

    20%
10.93 ± 0.02
74 ± 2
24 ± 0.5
21.2 ± 0.2
136.9 ± 0.7
183.1 ± 1.7
45.4 ± 0.6
47.0 ± 1.5
0.64 ± 0.01
9.5 ± 0.7

    30%
10.81 ± 0.01
64 ± 1
22 ± 0.3
22.1 ± 0.1
165.5 ± 1.5
192.5 ± 0.3
42.4 ± 1.5
45.8 ± 1.1
0.61 ± 0.00
11.5 ± 0.7

    40%
10.69 ± 0.01
62 ± 0
20 ± 0.8
23.3 ± 0.6
211.6 ± 4.9
200.3 ± 0.1
40.2 ± 0.2
42.8 ± 0.2
0.61 ± 0.01
12.0 ± 0.0

    50%
10.57 ± 0.01
62 ± 1
18 ± 0.5
23.9 ± 0.4
249.6 ± 1.8
207.5 ± 0.5
38.5 ± 1.3
41.6 ± 2.2
0.53 ± 0.00
13.5 ± 0.7

Mean ± SD, .

Means of the same column for each treatment having different superscripts are significantly different at according to Duncan test.

In general, water absorption capacity (WAC), oil absorption capacity (OAC), water solubility index (WSI), and the least gelification concentration (LGC) increased with the substitution level. This evolution was similar to the one noted by Njintang et al. [30] during substitution of wheat flour by taro flour. Increasing of WAC with substitution of hardened-yam flours suggested that wheat/hardened-yam composite flours could be used in food systems such as bread making that require lots of water to improve mechanical characteristics of the dough. Since variation of OAC was associated with presence of nonpolar chains, results of the present study suggested that substitution of wheat flour by hardened-yam flours significantly increased oil fixation sites in the composites flours. Thus, wheat/hardened-yam composite flours could be potentially useful in the structural interaction of food, especially for flavour retention and the taste improvement of products.

Emulsion activity (EA) and emulsion stability (ES) of wheat/hardened-yam composite flours significantly decreased with the increase of hardened-yam flour substitution. This result agreed with the study reported by Yatsumatsu et al. [31] who correlated the decrease of EA with the increase of fibre content, as it was reported that D. dumetorum hardened tubers are rich in fibres [32].

In this study, a decrease of bulk density was noted with the increase of substitution rate of various hardened-yam flours. This is valuable if one considers the works reported by Nelson-Quartey et al. [33] and Akubor and Badifu [34] which, respectively, showed that a decrease of bulk density promotes proper formulation of infant foods, and that decrease of the density during incorporation of Treculia africana flour in wheat flour is good for production of cookies.

To have a better understanding of relations existing between basic parameters of flours based on their physicochemical and functional properties, experimental results were analysed using HCA and PCA method.

Original data introduced for analysis, [], comprised 10 variables measured in 16 samples, where each entry matrix was the mean value of three replicates. The data were autoevaluated before analysis.

Figure 1 displays results of HCA. In this dendogram, there are four main groups for the similarity 0.6 (). Wheat flour forms a similar group with wheat/hardened-yam treated with kanwa composite flours (K10, K20, K30, K40, and K50). This suggested that, until 50% substitution, wheat/hardened-yam treated with kanwa composite flours preserves the physicochemical and functional properties of wheat flour. Wheat/hardened-yam composite flours (H) and wheat/fermented hardened-yam composite flours (F) are spatially away from the group formed by wheat and form a single group at the index of similarity of 0.4 characterized by a small Hagberg falling number (Table 2).

Figure 1: HCA on wheat flour and 15 wheat/hardened-yam composite flours.

Analysis of varimax-rotated principal components gave similar trends and characteristics to those observed in HCA, but with the advantage that correlations between variables and samples become clearer. Varimax-rotated loading factors representing correlations between principal components (PC) and original data are presented in Table 3 with their variances and Eigen values. PC1 included 56.2% of the variance in the introduced data and loadings, suggesting that it has a significant contribution to the functional properties. PC2 describes 32.45% of the total variance and has as main contributor physicochemical properties and emulsion activity. PC3 and PC4 only describe 5.35 and 3.84% of the total variance, respectively. Thus, PC1 and PC2 representing 88.65% total variance in the data can be enough to restitute the maximum of information contained in the original data.

Table 3: Loadings for the first four varimax rotated principal components.

Variables
PC1
PC2
PC3
PC4

Proteins
0.58
−0.80
−0.07
−0.06

WSI
−0.88
−0.25
0.00
0.41

WAC
−0.93
0.19
−0.27
−0.10

OAC
−0.93
−0.19
−0.27
−0.12

EA
0.56
−0.82
−0.03
0.01

ES
0.65
0.50
−0.56
0.04

Density
0.90
−0.05
−0.18
0.36

Zeleny index
0.66
−0.70
−0.09
−0.19

LGC
−0.70
−0.64
−0.19
−0.04

Hagberg falling number
0.55
0.80
0.01
−0.14

Eigen value
5.62
3.25
0.54
0.38

% total variance
56.20
32.45
5.35
3.84

Cumulated Eigen value
5.62
8.87
9.40
9.78

Cumulated variance (%)
56.20
88.65
94.01
97.84

Loadings with absolute values higher than 0.56 represent a significant contribution.

WAC: water absorption capacity.

OAC: oil absorption capacity.

WSI: water solubility index.

EA: emulsion activity.

ES: emulsion stability.

LGC: least gelatinisation concentration.

Results of HCA for variables are presented in Figure 2. In the dendogram obtained, three groups were observed for a similarity index of 0.6. The diastasic activity of flours represented by the Hagberg falling number is spatially separated from the main group formed by proteins, density, Zeleny index, LGC, WSI, EA, and ES and forms a single group at a similarity index of about 0.1 with WAC and OAC. This suggested that technological properties of wheat/hardened-yam composite flours at substitution levels used in this study are mainly influenced by the diastasic activity and correlation that may exist between diastasic activity, WAC, and OAC.

Figure 2: Dendogram (HCA) for the physicochemical and functional properties of flours.

Figure 3 presents the scores and the varimax-rotated loadings of the first two principal components. In this figure, it is remarkable to note that wheat (W) and the various wheat/hardened-yam treated with kanwa composite flours (K10, K20, K30, K40, and K50) form a group that is distinguished by a high Hagberg falling number, a low OAC, and a low WSI. The second group formed by wheat/hardened-yam composite flours (H10, H20, H30, H40, and H50) and wheat/fermented hardened-yam composite flours (F10, F20, F30, F40, and F50) is mainly characterised by a low Hagberg falling number, a high OAC, and a high WSI. At this level of analysis, it could be suggested that the technological properties of wheat/hardened-yam treated with kanwa composite flours are similar to those of wheat. However, a more detailed observation of this group can allow subdividing it into three subgroups consisting, respectively, of W, K10-K20-K30, and K40-K50, which are differentiated by variation in WAC, protein content, Zeleny index, and EA.

(a)

(b)

Figure 3: Scores and varimax-rotated loadings for the first two principal components.

Rheological properties of composite flours assessed by alveograph analysis are presented in Table 4. The effect of a partial substitution of wheat flour by various hardened-yam flours induced changes in the alveograph characteristics. For all composite flours, a drastic decrease of all parameters measured was noted at 10% substitution rate, followed by a progressive increase with increasing substitution rate. The alveograph characteristics in all cases were below the minimum threshold for the use of flour in bakery. This trend is different from the one noted by Yatsumatsu et al. [31] for wheat/taro composite flours and by Balla et al. [35] for wheat/sorghum composite flours describing a linear increase of alveograph parameters with increasing substitution rate. Results of this study suggested that wheat/hardened-yam composite flours are not suitable for bread making at all substitution levels and treatments type used in the study.

Table 4: Rheologic characteristics of various wheat/hardened-yam composite flours.

Rheologic characteristics
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%

Incorporation level of hardened-yam flour

(mm)
69
9
22
31
42

(mm)
58
9
11
10
10

1.19
1.06
2.01
3.11
4.11

(10⁻⁴ J)
148
4
10
16
22

⁢Incorporation level of the flour of hardened-
yam treated with kanwa

(mm)
69
18
32
50
65

(mm)
58
9
11
9
9

1.19
1.63
2.78
5.66
7.39

W (10⁻⁴ J)
148
10
17
23
30

⁢Incorporation level of fermented hardened-
yam flour

(mm)
69
6
21
26
38

(mm)
58
8
10
8
9

1.19
0.84
2.19
3.16
4.38

(10⁻⁴ J)
148
2
10
11
17

= tenacity; = extensibility; = deformation energy.

Considering the fact that the Zeleny index, indicating the capacity of proteins to form a viscoelastic mass, is in most cases at an acceptable level (Zeleny index ≥ 15, Table 2), and that extensibility () of the paste is mainly due to this capacity of gluten, it was surprising to note a loss of extensibility at 10% of substitution even after using a hard wheat with a protein content of 16 g/100 g DM. It was suggested that the phenomenon was due to the strong diastasic activity of composite flours (Table 2), which could make the paste soft and sticking. Hence, an inactivation of enzymes in hardened-yam flours before the mixture with wheat flour could help improving the alveograph characteristics of wheat/hardened-yam composite flours and make these flours more suitable for bread production.

The colour of flours can be an important parameter that can directly influence the acceptability of a product. CIE parameters of wheat/hardened-yam flours are presented in Table 5. In general, substitution level changes the CIE parameters of composite flours. parameter (luminance) increases with substitution of hardened-yam flour and is not significantly affected by the increase of substitution of hardened-yam treated with kanwa and hardened-yam fermented flours. parameter (red) decreases with the increase of the substitution level of various hardened-yam flours, while an increase was noted for parameter (yellow). In general, a partial substitution of wheat flour by different hardened-yam flours in study led to a significant increase of parameter (chroma) that measures colour saturation, and hue angle (), which shows the brightness and yellow colour of composite flours obtained.

Table 5: CIE colour parameters of wheat/hardened-yam composite flours.

CIE colour parameters
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%

Incorporation level of hardened-yam flour

93.47 ± 0.75
96.34 ± 0.75
96.38 ± 0.75
94.62 ± 0.75
96.97 ± 0.75
95.86 ± 0.75

0.10 ± 0.01
−0.46 ± 0.07
−1.00 ± 0.14
−1.19 ± 0.14
−1.52 ± 0.14
−1.60 ± 0.14

10.41 ± 0.02
13.10 ± 0.02
15.38 ± 0.02
16.21 ± 0.02
16.80 ± 0.02
18.00 ± 0.02

10.41 ± 0.02
13.11 ± 0.02
15.42 ± 0.02
16.26 ± 0.02
16.88 ± 0.02
18.08 ± 0.02

88.98 ± 0.62
91.81 ± 0.62
93.67 ± 0.62
94.12 ± 0.62
95.06 ± 0.62
94.96 ± 0.62

Incorporation level of the flour of hardened-yam treated with kanwa

93.47 ± 0.75
94.11 ± 0.75
92.99 ± 0.75
94.61 ± 0.75
94.11 ± 0.75
93.90 ± 0.75

0.10 ± 0.01
−0.43 ± 0.14
−0.89 ± 0.14
−0.91 ± 0.14
−1.09 ± 0.14
−1.04 ± 0.14

10.41 ± 0.02
13.05 ± 0.02
13.25 ± 0.02
14.23 ± 0.02
13.99 ± 0.02
14.90 ± 0.02

10.41 ± 0.02
13.06 ± 0.02
13.29 ± 0.02
14.27 ± 0.02
14.05 ± 0.02
14.94 ± 0.02

88.98 ± 0.62
91.88 ± 0.62
93.82 ± 0.62
93.61 ± 0.62
94.44 ± 0.62
93.95 ± 0.62

Incorporation level of the flour of fermented hardened-yam

93.47 ± 0.75
92.88 ± 0.75
92.28 ± 0.75
92.09 ± 0.75
93.75 ± 0.75
93.04 ± 0.75

0.10 ± 0.01
0.07 ± 0.14
−0.08 ± 0.14
−0.05 ± 0.14
−0.12 ± 0.14
−0.12 ± 0.14

10.41 ± 0.02
12.19 ± 0.02
13.03 ± 0.02
13.60 ± 0.02
13.44 ± 0.02
13.58 ± 0.02

10.41 ± 0.02
12.19 ± 0.02
13.03 ± 0.02
13.60 ± 0.02
13.44 ± 0.02
13.58 ± 0.02

88.98 ± 0.62
89.69 ± 0.62
90.37 ± 0.62
90.18 ± 0.62
90.52 ± 0.62
90.52 ± 0.62

Mean ± SD, .

Means of the same line for each treatment having different superscripts are significantly different at according to Duncan test.

4. Conclusion

Under standard condition of bread making, flours made from D. dumetorum hardened tubers did not present any baking property. A partial substitution of wheat flour by hardened-yam flours straightened the baking properties of the flours (except for the Hagberg falling number which remained low) and significantly influenced the functional properties of the flours. Multivariate analysis (HCA and PCA) of experimental data brought together the different flours studied in two groups defined in two principal components: the first group was composed by wheat and various wheat/hardened-yam treated with kanwa composite flours (K10, K20, K30, K40, and K50) and was characterised by a high Hagberg falling number and a low WAC and WSI, while the second group was composed of wheat/hardened-yam composite flours (H10, H20, H30, H40, and H50) and wheat/fermented hardened-yam composite flours (F10, F20, F30, F40, and F50) and was characterized by a low Hagberg falling number and a high WAC and WSI. In all the cases the inadequate diastasic activity was the limiting factor preventing the wheat/hardened-yam composite flours to be appropriate for bread making.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

G. N. Medoua, I. Lape Mbome, T. Agbor-Egbe, and C. M. F. Mbofung, “Antinutritional factors changes occurring in trifoliate yam (Dioscorea dumetorum) tubers after harvest,” Food Chemistry, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 716–720, 2007.

G. N. Medoua, I. L. Mbome, T. Agbor-Egbe, and C. M. F. Mbofung, “Study of the hard-to-cook property of stored yam tubers (Dioscorea dumetorum) and some determining biochemical factors,” Food Research International, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 143–149, 2005.

G. N. Medoua and C. M. F. Mbofung, “Hard-to-cook defect in trifoliate yam Dioscorea dumetorum tubers after harvest,” Food Research International, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 513–518, 2006.

G. N. Medoua, I. L. Mbome, T. A. Egbe, and C. M. F. Mbofung, “Salts soaking treatment for improving the textural and functional properties of trifoliate yam (Dioscorea dumetorum) hardened tubers,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. E464–E469, 2007.

G. N. Medoua, I. L. Mbome, T. Agbor-Egbe, and C. M. F. Mbofung, “Influence of fermentation on some quality characteristics of trifoliate yam (Dioscorea dumetorum) hardened tubers,” Food Chemistry, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 1180–1186, 2008.

T. A. Shittu, A. O. Raji, and L. O. Sanni, “Bread from composite cassava-wheat flour: I. Effect of baking time and temperature on some physical properties of bread loaf,” Food Research International, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 280–290, 2007.

H. Mamat, P. Matanjun, S. Ibrahim, S. F. Md Amin, M. Abdul Hamid, and A. S. Rameli, “The effect of seaweed composite flour on the textural properties of dough and bread,” Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 1057–1062, 2014.

R. F. Abdelghafor, A. I. Mustafa, A. M. H. Ibrahim, and P. G. Krishnan, “Quality of bread from composite flour of sorghum and hard white winter wheat,” Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2011.

N. O. Eddy, P. G. Udofia, and D. Eyo, “Sensory evaluation of wheat/cassava composite bread and effect of label information on acceptance and preference,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 6, no. 20, pp. 2415–2418, 2007.

M. S. Ammar, A. E. Hegazy, and S. H. Bedeir, “Using of taro flour as partial substitute of wheat flour in bread making,” World Journal of Dairy and Food Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 94–99, 2009.

I. Zuwariah and A. A. Noor Aziah, “Physicochemical properties of wheat breads substituted with banana flour and modified banana flour,” Journal Tropical Agriculture and Food Science, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 2009.

U. J. Ukpabi, “Farmstead bread making potential of lesser yam (Dioscorea esculenta) flour in Nigeria,” Australian Journal of Crop Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 68–73, 2010.

J. Ndife, L. O. Abdulraheem, and U. M. Zakari, “Evaluation of the nutritional and sensory quality of functional breads produced from whole wheat and soya bean flour blends,” African Journal Food Science, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 466–472, 2011.

R. J. Mongi, B. K. Ndabikunze, B. E. Chove, P. Mamiro, C. C. Ruhembe, and J. G. Ntwenya, “Proximate composition, bread characteristics and sensory evaluation of cocoyam-wheat composite breads,” African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 5586–5599, 2011.

I. Mohammed, A. R. Ahmed, and B. Senge, “Dough rheology and bread quality of wheat–chickpea flour blends,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 196–202, 2012.

A. R. Ahmed, I. Mohammed, and B. Senge, “Oscillation measurement and creep test of bread prepared from wheat-lupin flours and wheat flour-lupin fibre dough’s blends,” Annual Transactions of the Nordic Rheology Society, vol. 20, pp. 145–152, 2012.

I. B. Oluwalana, S. A. Malomo, and E. O. Ogbodogbo, “Quality assessment of flour and bread from sweet potato wheat composite flour blends,” International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 65–76, 2012.

R. Begum, M. Uddin, M. Rahman, and M. S. Islam, “Comparative study on the development of maize flour based composite bread,” Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 133–139, 2013.

AACC International, Approved Methods of Analysis, Method 46-12.01, Crude Protein, Kjeldahl Method, Boric Acid Modification, St. Paul, Minn, USA, 11th edition, 2010.

AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA, 18th edition, 2005.

AACC International, “Method 56-60.01 ‘Sedimentation Test for Flour’,” in Approved Methods of Analysis, St. Paul, Minn, USA, AACC International, 11th edition, 2010.

AACC International, “Determination of falling number,” in Approved Methods of Analysis, Method 56-81.03, AACC International, St. Paul, Minn, USA, 11th edition, 2010.

M. O. Bello, M. P. Tolaba, and C. Suarez, “Factors affecting water uptake of rice grain during soaking,” LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 811–816, 2004.

R. A. Anderson, H. F. Conway, V. F. Pfeiffer, and E. L. Griffin, “Roll and extrusion cooking of grain sorghum grits,” Cereal Science Today, vol. 14, pp. 372–375, 1969.

F. W. Sosulski, “The centrifuge method for determining flour absorption in hard red spring wheat,” Cereal Chemistry, vol. 39, pp. 344–350, 1962.

C. W. Coffman and V. V. Garcia, “Functional properties and amino acid content of a protein isolate from mung bean flour,” International Journal of Food Science & Technology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 473–484, 1977.

B. O. Okezie and A. Bello, “Physicochemical and functional properties of winged bean flour and isolate compared with soy isolate,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 450–454, 1988.

V. Q. Neto, N. Narain, J. B. Silva, and P. S. Bora, “Functional properties of raw and heat processed cashew nut (Anacardium occidentale, L.) kernel protein isolates,” Nahrung, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 258–262, 2001.

AACC International, Approved Methods of Analysis, Method 54-30.02, Alveograph Method for Soft and Hard Wheat Flour, St. Paul, Minn, USA, 11th edition, 2010.

N. Y. Njintang, C. M. F. Mbofung, F. Balaam, P. Kitissou, and J. Scher, “Effect of taro (Colocasia esculenta) flour addition on the functional and alveographic properties of wheat flour and dough,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 273–279, 2008.

K. Yatsumatsu, K. Sawada, and S. Morita, “Whipping and emulsifying properties of soy bean products,” Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 715–727, 1972.

D. Polycarp, E. O. Afoakwa, A. S. Budu, and E. Otoo, “Characterization of chemical composition and anti-nutritional factors in seven species within the Ghanaian yam (dioscorea) germplasm,” International Food Research Journal, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 985–992, 2012.

F. C. Nelson-Quartey, I. N. Oduro, W. O. Ellis, and F. K. Amagloh, “Formulation of an infant food based on breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) and breadnut (Artocarpus camansi),” Acta Horticulturae, vol. 757, pp. 215–224, 2007.

P. I. Akubor and G. I. O. Badifu, “Chemical composition, functional properties and baking potential of African breadfruit kernel and wheat flour blends,” International Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 223–229, 2004.

A. Balla, C. Blecker, M. Oumarou, M. Pacquot, and C. Deroanne, “Mise au point de pains composites à base de mélanges de farines de sorgho-blé et analyse textural,” Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 69–77, 1999.