Journal of Ceramics
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 8346563, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8346563

Research Article

Anisotropic Thermal Expansion of Zirconium Diboride: An Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Diffraction Study

William A. Paxton,¹ Tevfik E. Özdemir,¹ İlyas Şavklıyıldız,¹ Terence Whalen,¹ Hülya Biçer,¹ Enver Koray Akdoğan,¹ Zhong Zhong,² and Thomas Tsakalakos¹

¹Materials Science and Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
²Photon Sciences, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA

Received 31 March 2016; Revised 10 May 2016; Accepted 12 May 2016

Academic Editor: Yuan-hua Lin

Copyright © 2016 William A. Paxton et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Zirconium diboride (ZrB₂) is an attractive material due to its thermal and electrical properties. In recent years, ZrB₂ has been investigated as a superior replacement for sapphire when used as a substrate for gallium nitride devices. Like sapphire, ZrB₂ has an anisotropic hexagonal structure which defines its directionally dependent properties. However, the anisotropic behavior of ZrB₂ is not well understood. In this paper, we use energy-dispersive synchrotron X-ray diffraction to measure the thermal expansion of polycrystalline ZrB₂ powder from 300 to 1150 K. Nine Bragg reflections are fit using Pseudo-Voigt peak profiles and used to compute the and lattice parameters using a nonlinear least-squares approximation. The temperature-dependent instantaneous thermal expansion coefficients are determined for each -axis and -axis direction and are described by the following equations: = ( + × )/( × + ) and = ( + )/( + ). Our results are within range of previously reported values but describe the temperature anisotropy in more detail. We show that anisotropic expansion coefficients converge to the same value at about 780 K and diverge at higher temperatures. Results are compared with other reported values.

1. Introduction

Zirconium diboride (ZrB₂) is a nonoxide ceramic material with a melting temperature of °C and high electrical conductivity ( S·m⁻¹) [1]. The ultrahigh melting temperature and resistance to oxidation of ZrB₂ make the material attractive for applications in ultrasonic flight, continuous steel processing, and atmospheric reentry [1–3]. ZrB₂ is also unique, however, for its electronic properties. Recently, single crystal ZrB₂ has been used as a substrate for gallium nitride (GaN) semiconductor devices [4, 5]. ZrB₂ has intrinsic advantages over sapphire, the industry standard. Notably, ZrB₂ has a smaller lattice mismatch to GaN and superior electronic and thermal conductivity.

Proper use of ZrB₂ in any application requires an in-depth understanding of the thermal behavior. The crystal arrangement of ZrB₂ is hexagonal with alternating layers of Zr and B atoms [1]. This hexagonal nature of ZrB₂ leads to anisotropic behavior and properties which are crucial to understand, especially in applications where the crystal orientation of ZrB₂ is controlled.

The thermal behavior of ZrB₂ has been studied in the past. The pioneering work by Kinoshita and coworkers was able to show that ZrB₂ is a viable substrate for GaN electronics. They grew single crystals of ZrB₂ using a float zone method and measured the coefficient of thermal expansion along the direction [4, 5]. Thermal expansion was later studied by Okamoto et al. where they grew single crystals in a similar manner and measured expansion in both the and directions using a pushrod-type dilatometer from room temperature to 1073 K [6]. Their results revealed the anisotropic nature of thermal expansion with average coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) values of and in the and directions, respectively. They also showed that their values carry a temperature dependence, however. Zimmermann et al. used a densified polycrystalline sample to study the thermal expansion of ZrB₂ [7]. Their study employed the use of dilatometer and measured expansion from 300 K to 1675 K. They were able to measure the temperature-dependent CTE but their polycrystalline sample means that they were insensitive to directional effects. The CTE of ZrB₂ can also be calculated from first principles. Milman et al. performed a molecular dynamics study and calculated values of thermal expansion that were within range of previous reports. While they mention that Okamoto’s results show anisotropy and temperature dependence, they were unable to address these features within their experimental framework [8].

Scattering techniques such as X-ray diffraction can measure the distance between planes of atoms in a crystal. Because of this, X-ray diffraction has been used extensively to measure thermal expansion [9–14]. Energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction is particularly well-suited for measuring changes in interatomic distances [15–19]. This is because unlike the more-common angular-dispersive X-ray diffraction, EDXRD satisfies the scattering condition with polychromatic radiation at a fixed angle. This enables one to make very precise lattice parameter measurements [10, 20]. Additionally, the use of an energy-discriminating detector means that the entire spectrum is collected in parallel which is ideal for time-resolved measurements [21, 22].

In this paper, we take advantage of the penetrative power of synchrotron radiation and measure the thermal expansion of polycrystalline ZrB₂ in situ up to 1100 K. Particular focus is given to the anisotropic effects of ZrB₂’s hexagonal lattice and the temperature dependence of thermal expansion.

2. Experimental

Polycrystalline ZrB₂ powder was obtained from H. C. Stark Corporation (Grade B Hf min 0.2% 90% <6 μm). The powder was loosely packed in an alumina vessel and a type-K thermocouple was placed in the center of the powder. The vessel was then placed in a furnace built for high temperature in situ diffraction work. The details of this furnace have been covered previously in the literature [21].

Energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction (EDXRD) was carried out at the National Synchrotron Light Source X17B1 beamline at Brookhaven National Laboratory. EDXRD uses a fixed angle and polychromatic radiation in order to satisfy the Bragg diffraction condition. As a result, the diffraction measurement works directly in reciprocal space and enables precise determination of the lattice parameters. The measurement volume is fixed in space and the spectra are collected in a parallel fashion. These factors of EDXRD make it a viable technique for in situ measurement of thermal expansion. Figure 1 shows the experimental configuration.

Figure 1: Schematic of the EDXRD experiment.

The sample was heated from room temperature to approximately 1150 K at a heating rate of 5 K per minute in an argon environment to prevent oxidation. Throughout the experiment, spectra were collected every 30 seconds. Additionally, the temperature was logged by the thermocouple every one second. The clocks on both the temperature logger and the EDXRD computer were synchronized so that the temperature and EDXRD data could be correlated.

Standards for calibration were collected from Ag, Au, CeO₂, Cu, Ge, LaB₆, W, and Y₂O₃ and used to determine the channel number to energy relationship and the exact angle of diffraction. Additionally, laboratory powder diffraction was carried out to characterize the powder and included in the calibration.

The 001, 100, 101, 002, 110, 102, 111, 200, and 201 peaks were identified in the spectra and were fit with Pseudo-Voigt peak-shape function [23]. The -spacing for the nine peaks were then used to calculate the and lattice parameters using a nonlinear least-squares determination incorporating the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm using the fsolve function in MATLAB.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows the lattice parameter as a function of temperature and Figure 3 shows the lattice parameter as a function of temperature. The data show a minimal degree of scatter which should be considered a representation of the error in both the peak fitting and the temperature recording. Additionally, throughout the experiment we observe uniform thermal expansion and no structural changes.

Figure 2: Lattice constant as a function of temperature.

Figure 3: Lattice constant as a function of temperature.

The CTE can be expressed as

where is a length and is the rate of change of that length with temperature. Rearranging gives us

assuming that the expansion coefficient does not change with temperature. For small changes in temperature, this provides a good approximation. However, this experiment deals with a temperature range of 850 K, rendering the above approximation useless. The behavior of the lattice parameter over the given range of temperatures can be approximated using the following second order polynomial equation:

where is the lattice parameter, is the measured temperature, is a reference temperature, is the lattice parameter at the reference temperature, and and are the first- and second-order expansion coefficients, respectively.

The quadratic behavior of the lattice parameter with temperature results in a CTE that is linearly dependent on temperature. By taking the derivative of the fit equation and dividing by the lattice parameter, one can calculate the temperature-dependent instantaneous expansion coefficient [24, 25]. This is shown in the following equation:

In both Figures 2 and 3, the lattice parameter data are fit with the second order polynomial equation and a reference temperature of 293.15 K. The fitting results are given in Table 1. The fit is excellent with a coefficient of determination () value greater than 0.998 for both lattice parameters.

Table 1: Constants solved using the polynomial fit of lattice parameter versus temperature.

Lattice parameter

⋅K⁻¹
⋅K⁻²

0.9983

0.9986

The CTE dependence on temperature for both the and directions is shown in Figure 4. Additionally, selected values are given in Table 2. At room temperature, we observe anisotropic behavior with a larger CTE in the direction. The two lines converge around 780 K, however, where at this temperature the CTE is isotropic. At temperatures greater than 780 K, we observe a higher expansion in the direction.

Table 2: Instantaneous values of expansion coefficient at selected temperatures.

Temperature

K
10⁻⁶ K⁻¹
10⁻⁶ K⁻¹

300
4.17
4.55

400
4.68
4.98

500
5.19
5.41

600
5.70
5.83

700
6.20
6.26

800
6.71
6.68

900
7.21
7.10

1000
7.71
7.52

1100
8.21
7.95

Figure 4: Temperature dependence of coefficient of thermal expansion.

The calculated expression for the temperature-dependent instantaneous expansion coefficient is given below:

There are some interesting differences when comparing our results with other values reported in the literature. CTE values from Okamoto et al., Zimmermann et al., and Milman et al. are plotted in Figure 4. For CTE values given with a range, they are plotted at their upper limit of the range. Above 650 K, there is good agreement between our values and those reported by others. However, below 650 K our values are lower than those of Okamoto et al. Because this is within operating temperature range of a typical GaN LED, it is important to understand the results. It is well known for thermal expansion that lattice parameter measurements differ from macroscopic measurements. Particularly, our diffraction is not sensitive to the increases in thermodynamic defects associated with higher temperatures. Additionally, Okamoto et al. do not mention anything about the quality of their crystal, that is, whether or not there is significant twinning or other defects. These things could explain the significantly higher values they observe.

Figure 5 shows both the EDXRD and ADXRD spectra at room temperature. We see a good agreement between the two methods and observe no secondary phases. Whole pattern fitting was carried out on the ADXRD measurement and the lattice parameters were found to be within range of the literature values.

(a)

(b)

Figure 5: Diffraction patterns. (a) Energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction data at 300 K. (b) Angular-dispersive X-ray diffraction data at 300 K.

4. Conclusion

We performed energy-dispersive synchrotron X-ray diffraction measurements while heating a polycrystalline ZrB₂ powder from 300 to 1150 K. The temperature-dependent instantaneous thermal expansion coefficients were determined for the -axis and -axis directions. The results show that and converge to the same value at around 780 K, below which is higher and above which is higher.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Bart Visser and Ankur Choksi for their support in the laboratory and helpful discussions. This research was supported by the Office of Naval Research Grant no. N00014-13-1-0164 entitled “Thermokinetic Origins of Sintering in Nanocrystalline Ceramics by In Situ High Temperature and Pressure Synchrotron Energy-Dispersive X-ray Diffraction.”

References

W. G. Fahrenholtz, G. E. Hilmas, I. G. Talmy, and J. A. Zaykoski, “Refractory diborides of zirconium and hafnium,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1347–1364, 2007.

A. L. Chamberlain, W. G. Fahrenholtz, G. E. Hilmas, and D. T. Ellerby, “High-strength zirconium diboride-based ceramics,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 1170–1172, 2004.

A. L. Chamberlain, W. G. Fahrenholtz, and G. E. Hilmas, “Pressureless sintering of zirconium diboride,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 450–456, 2006.

H. Kinoshita, S. Otani, S. Kamiyama et al., “Zirconium diboride (0001) as an electrically conductive lattice-matched substrate for gallium nitride,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 2: Letters, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. L1280–L1282, 2001.

H. Kinoshita, S. Otani, S. Kamiyama et al., “ZrB₂ substrate for nitride semiconductors,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 2260–2264, 2003.

N. L. Okamoto, M. Kusakari, K. Tanaka et al., “Temperature dependence of thermal expansion and elastic constants of single crystals of ZrB₂ and the suitability of ZrB₂ as a substrate for GaN film,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 93, no. 1, article 88, 2003.

J. W. Zimmermann, G. E. Hilmas, W. G. Fahrenholtz et al., “Thermophysical properties of ZrB₂ and ZrB₂-SiC ceramics,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 1405–1411, 2008.

V. Milman, B. Winkler, and M. I. J. Probert, “Stiffness and thermal expansion of ZrB₂: an ab initio study,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 17, no. 13, pp. 2233–2241, 2005.

J. W. Edwards, R. Speiser, and H. L. Johnston, “High temperature structure and thermal expansion of some metals as determined by X-ray diffraction data. I. Platinum, tantalum, niobium, and molybdenum,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 424–428, 1951.

B. Buras, J. S. Olsen, L. Gerward, G. Will, and E. Hinze, “X-ray energy-dispersive diffractometry using synchrotron radiation,” Journal of Applied Crystallography, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 431–438, 1977.

T. A. Mary, J. S. O. Evans, T. Vogt, and A. W. Sleight, “Negative thermal expansion from 0.3 to 1050 Kelvin in ZrW₂O₈,” Science, vol. 272, no. 5258, pp. 90–92, 1996.

A. H. Chin, R. W. Schoenlein, T. E. Glover, P. Balling, W. P. Leemans, and C. V. Shank, “Ultrafast structural dynamics in InSb probed by time-resolved X-ray diffraction,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 336–339, 1999.

K. A. Udachin, C. I. Ratcliffe, and J. A. Ripmeester, “Structure, composition, and thermal expansion of CO₂ hydrate from single crystal X-ray diffraction measurements,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 105, no. 19, pp. 4200–4204, 2001.

Y. Maniwa, R. Fujiwara, H. Kira et al., “Thermal expansion of single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) bundles: X-ray diffraction studies,” Physical Review B, vol. 64, no. 24, Article ID 241402, 2001.

M. Croft, I. Zakharchenko, Z. Zhong et al., “Strain field and scattered intensity profiling with energy dispersive X-ray scattering,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 578–586, 2002.

M. Croft, Z. Zhong, N. Jisrawi et al., “Strain profiling of fatigue crack overload effects using energy dispersive X-ray diffraction,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 27, no. 10-12, pp. 1408–1419, 2005.

J. Rijssenbeek, Y. Gao, Z. Zhong et al., “In situ X-ray diffraction of prototype sodium metal halide cells: time and space electrochemical profiling,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 196, no. 4, pp. 2332–2339, 2011.

W. A. Paxton, Z. Zhong, and T. Tsakalakos, “Tracking inhomogeneity in high-capacity lithium iron phosphate batteries,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 275, pp. 429–434, 2015.

W. A. Paxton, E. K. Akdoğan, İ. Şavkliyildiz et al., “Asynchronous stoichiometric response in lithium iron phosphate batteries,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 417–423, 2015.

E. K. Akdoğan, I. Şavklıyıldız, H. Biçer et al., “Anomalous lattice expansion in yttria stabilized zirconia under simultaneous applied electric and thermal fields: a time-resolved in situ energy dispersive X-ray diffractometry study with an ultrahigh energy synchrotron probe,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 113, no. 23, Article ID 233503, 2013.

B. Kämpfe, F. Luczak, and B. Michel, “Energy dispersive X-ray diffraction,” Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 391–396, 2006.

W. A. Paxton, In-situ and operando characterization of batteries with energy-dispersive synchrotron X-ray diffraction [Ph.D. thesis], Rutgers University-Graduate School-New Brunswick, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 2015.

M. Wojdyr, “Fityk: a general-purpose peak fitting program,” Journal of Applied Crystallography, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1126–1128, 2010.

D. Harris, Materials for Infrared Windows and Domes: Properties and Performance, vol. PM70 of SPIE Press Monograph, Society of Photo Optical, 1999.

S. Bagdade and ASM, ASM Ready Reference: Thermal Properties of Metals (Materials Data Series), ASM International, Novelty, Ohio, USA, 2002.