Advances in Astronomy

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 162949, 26 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/162949

Research Article

Chemical and Photometric Evolution Models for Disk, Irregular, and Low Mass Galaxies

Mercedes Mollá1,2

¹Departamento de Investigación Básica, CIEMAT, Avenida Complutense 40, 28040 Madrid, Spain

²IAG, University of São Paulo, 05508-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Received 18 October 2013; Revised 30 December 2013; Accepted 1 January 2014; Published 20 May 2014

Academic Editor: Jorge Iglesias Páramo

Copyright © 2014 Mercedes Mollá. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

We summarize the updated set of multiphase chemical evolution models performed with 44 theoretical radial mass initial distributions and 10 possible values of efficiencies to form molecular clouds and stars. We present the results about the infall rate histories, the formation of the disk, and the evolution of the radial distributions of diffuse and molecular gas surface density, stellar profile, star formation rate surface density, and elemental abundances of C, N, O, and Fe, finding that the radial gradients for these elements begin steeper and flatten with increasing time or decreasing redshift, although the outer disks always show a certain flattening for all times. With the resulting star formation and enrichment histories, we calculate the spectral energy distributions (SEDs) for each radial region by using the ones for single stellar populations resulting from the evolutive synthesis model POPSTAR. With these SEDs we may compute finally the broad band magnitudes and colors radial distributions in the Johnson and in the SLOAN/SDSS systems which are the main result of this work. We present the evolution of these brightness and color profiles with the redshift.

1. Introduction

Chemical evolution models to study the evolution of spiral galaxies have been the subject of a high number of works for the last decades. From the works by Lynden-Bell [1], Tinsley [2], Clayton [3, 4], and Sommer-Larsen and Yoshii [5], many other models have been developed to analyze the evolution of a disk galaxy. The first attempts were performed to interpret the G-dwarf metallicity distribution and the radial gradient of abundances [6–16] observed in our Milky Way galaxy (MWG). A radial decrease of abundances was soon observed in most of external spiral galaxies, too (see Henry and Worthey [17] and references therein), although the shape of the radial distribution changes from galaxy to galaxy, at least when it is measured in dex kpc⁻¹ (recent results seem to indicate that the radial gradient may be universal for all galaxies when it is measured in dex [18], being the radius enclosing the half of the total luminosity of a disk galaxy, or with any other normalization radius, something already suggested some years ago by Garnett [19] although the statistics was not large enough to reach accurate conclusions).

It was early evident that it was impossible to reproduce these observations by using the classical closed box model [20] which relates the metallicity of a region with its fraction of gas over the total mass, (stars, , plus gas, ), . Therefore infall or outflows of gas in MWG and other nearby spirals were soon considered necessary to fit the data. In fact, such as it was established theoretically by Goetz and Koeppen [21] and Koeppen [22] a radial gradient of abundances may be created only by 4 possible ways: (1) a radial variation of the initial mass function (IMF), (2) a variation of the stellar yields along the galactocentric radius, (3) a star formation rate (SFR) changing with the radius, and (4) a gas infall rate variable, , with radius. The first possibility is not usually considered as probable, while the second one is already included in modern models, since the stellar yields are in fact dependent on metallicity. Thus, from the seminal works from Lacey and Fall [23], Güsten and Mezger [24], and Clayton [3] most of the models in the literature [25–32], including the multiphase model used in this work, explain the existence of this radial gradient by the combined effects of a SFR and an infall of gas which vary with the galactocentric radius in the galaxy.

Most of the chemical evolution models of the literature, included some of the recently published, are, however, only devoted to the MWG, (totally or only for a region of it, halo or bulge) [33–38] or to any other individual local galaxy as M 31, M 33 or other local dwarf galaxies [35, 39–50]. These works perform the models in a Tailor-Made Models way, done by hand for each galaxy or region. There are not models applicable to any galaxy, except our grid of models shown in Mollá and Diaz ([51], hereinafter MD05) and these ones from Boissier and Prantzos [32, 52], who presented a wide set of models with two parameters, the total mass or rotation velocity, and the efficiency to form molecular clouds and stars in MD05 and a angular momentum parameter in the last authors grid.

Besides that, these classical numerical chemical evolution models only compute the masses in the different phases of a region (gas, stars, elements, etc.) or the different proportions among them. They do not give the corresponding photometric evolution, preventing the comparison of chemical information with the corresponding stellar one. There exist a few consistent models which calculate both things simultaneously in a consistent way, as those from Vazquez et al. [40], Boissier and Prantzos [52] or those from Fritze-Von Alvensleben et al. [53], Bicker et al. [54], and Kotulla et al. ([55], hereafter GALEV). The latter, GALEV evolutionary synthesis models, describe the evolution of stellar populations including a simultaneous treatment of the chemical evolution of the gas and of the spectral evolution of the stellar content. These authors, however, treat each galaxy as a whole for only some typical galaxies along the Hubble sequence and do not perform the study of radial profiles of mass, abundances, and light simultaneously. The series of works by Boissier and Prantzos [32, 52], Prantzos and Boissier [56], and Boissier et al. [57] seems one of few that give models allowing an analysis of the chemical and photometric evolution of disk galaxies.

Given the advances in the instrumentation, it is now possible to study high redshift galaxies as the local ones with spatial resolution are good enough to obtain radial distributions of abundances and of colors or magnitudes and thus to perform careful studies of the possible evolution of the different regions of disk galaxies. For instance to check the existence of radial gradients at other evolutionary times different than the present [58–61] and their evolution with time or redshift is now possible. It is also possible to compare these gradients with the radial distributions from the stellar populations to study possible migration effects. It is therefore important to have a grid of consistent chemo-spectro-photometric models which allows the analysis of both types of data simultaneously.

The main objective of this work is to give the spectrophotometric evolution of the theoretical galaxies presented in MD05, for which we have updated the chemical evolution models. In that work we presented a grid of chemical evolution models for 440 theoretical galaxies, with 44 different total mass, as defined by its maximum rotation velocity and radial mass distributions, and 10 possible values of efficiencies to form molecular clouds and stars. Now we have updated these models by including a bulge region and by using a different relation mass-life-meantime for stars now following the Padova stellar tracks. These models do not consider radial flows nor stars migration since no dynamical model is included. The possible outflows by supernova explosions are not included, too. We check that with the continuous star formation histories resulting of these models, the supernova explosions do not appear in sufficient number as to produce the energy injection necessary to have outflows of mass. With these chemical evolution model results, we calculate the spectrophotometric evolution by using each time step of the evolutionary model as a single stellar populations at which we assign a spectrum taken from the POPSTAR evolutionary synthesis models [62]. Our purpose in to give as a catalogue the evolution of each radial region of a disk and this way the radial distributions of elemental abundances, star formation rate, gas, and stars will be available along with the radial profiles of broad band magnitudes for any time of the calculated evolution.

The work is divided as follows: we summarize the updated chemical evolution models in Section 2. Results related to the surface densities and abundances are given in Section 3. We describe our method to calculate the SEDs of these theoretical galaxies and the corresponding broad band magnitudes and colors in Section 4. The corresponding spectrophotometric results are shown in Section 5 where we give a catalog of the evolution of these magnitudes in the rest-frame of the galaxies. Some important predictions arise from these models which are given in the conclusions.

2. The Chemical Evolution Model Description

The models shown here are the ones from MD05 and therefore a more detailed explanation about the computation is given in that work. We started with a mass of primordial gas in a spherical region representing a protogalaxy or halo. The initial mass within the protogalaxy is the dynamical mass calculated by means of the rotation velocity, , through the expression [63]:

with in, in kpc, and in km. We used the universal rotation curve from (URC) from Persic et al. [64] to calculate a set of rotation velocity curves and from these velocity distributions we obtained the mass radial distributions (see MD for details and Figure 2 showing these distributions). It was also possible to use those equations to obtain the scale length of the disk , the optical radius, defined as the one where the surface brightness profile is , which, if disks follow the Freeman’s [65] law, is and the virial radius, which we take as the galaxy radius . The total mass of the galaxy is taken as the mass enclosed in this radius . The expression for the URC was given by means of the parameter , the ratio between the galaxy luminosity, , and the one of the MWG, , in band I. This parameter defines the maximum rotation velocity, , and the radii described above. Thus, we obtained the values of the maximum rotation velocities and the corresponding parameters and mass radial distributions for a set of values such as it may be seen in Table 1 from MD05.

Table 1: Theoretical galaxy models selected to represent a simulated Hubble sequence.

Ropt

Km s⁻¹
10¹¹ 
kpc
Gyr

3
48
0.3
2.3
31.6
8
0.037
2.6

10
78
1.3
4.1
15.5
7
0.075
1.5

21
122
4.3
7.1
8.1
6
0.15
1.0

24
163
9.8
10.1
5.4
5
0.30
5.0

28
200
17.9
13.0
4.0
4
0.45
1.4

35
250
33.5
16.9
2.9
3
0.65
3.4

39
290
52.7
20.6
2.3
1
0.95
8.8

To the radial distributions of disks calculated by means of (1) described above, we have added a region located at the center to represent a bulge. The total mass of the bulge is assumed as a 10% of the total mass of the disk. The radius of this bulge is taken as . Both quantities are estimated from the correlations found by Balcells et al. [66] among the disk and the bulges data.

2.1. The Infall Rate: Its Dependence on the Dynamical Mass and on the Galactocentric Radius

We assume that the gas falls from the halo to the equatorial plane forming out the disk in a scenario ELS [67]. The time-scale of this process, or collapse-time scale , characteristic of every galaxy, changes with its total dynamical mass , following the expression from Gallagher III et al. [68]:

where is the total mass of the galaxy and is its age. We assume that all galaxies begin to form at the same time and evolve for a time of  Gyr. We use the value of 13.8 Gyr, given by the Planck experiment [69] for the age of the Universe and therefore galaxies start to form at a time .

Normalizing to MWG, we obtain

where is the total mass of MWG and  Gyr (see details in the next paragraph) is the assumed characteristic collapse-time scale for our galaxy.

The above expression implies that galaxies more massive than MWG form in a shorter time-scale, that is more rapidly, than the least massive galaxies which will need more time to form their disks. This assumption is in agreement with the observations from Jimenez et al. [70], Heavens et al. [71], and Pérez et al. [72] which find that the most massive galaxies have their stellar populations in place at very early times while the less massive ones form most of their stars at . This is also in agreement with self-consistent cosmological simulations which show that a large proportion of massive objects are formed at early times (high redshift), while the formation of less massive ones is more extended in time, thus simulating a modern version of the monolithic collapse scenario ELS.

The calculated collapse-time scale is assumed that corresponds to a radial region located in a characteristic radius, which is /2 ~ 6.5 kpc for the MWG model which uses the distribution with and number 28, with a maximum rotation velocity  . The value  Gyr was determined by a detailed study of models for MWG. We performed a large number of chemical evolution models changing the inputs free-parameters and comparing the results with many observational data [27, 28] to estimate the best value. Similar characteristic radii (all these radii and values are related to the stellar light and not to the mass, but we clear that we do not use them in our models except to define the characteristic radius for each theoretical mass radial distribution. The free parameters are selected for the region defined by this but taking into account that we normalize the values after a calibration with the solar neighborhood model, a change of this radius would not modify our model results) for our grid of models were given in Table 1 from MD05 too, with the characteristic (from now we will use the expression for for the sake of simplicity) obtained for each galaxy total mass .

By taking into account that the collapse time scale depends on the dynamical mass and that spiral disks show a clear profile of density with higher values inside than in the outside regions, we may assume that the infall rate, and therefore the collapse time scale , has a radial dependence, too. Since the mass density seems to be an exponential in most of cases, we then assumed a similar expression:

where is the scale-length of the collapse time-scale, taken as around half of the scale-length of surface density brightness distribution, ; that is .

Obviously the collapse time scale for the bulge region is obtained naturally from the above equation with . We show in Figure 1(a) the collapse time scale , in natural logarithmic scale, as a function of the galactocentric radius, for seven radial distributions of total mass, as defined by their maximum rotation velocity, , and plotted with different colors, as labeled. These seven theoretical galaxies are used as examples and their characteristics are summarized in Table 1, where we have the number of the distribution, , corresponding to column 2 from Table 1 in MD05 in column 1, the maximum rotation velocity, , in , in column 2, the total mass, , in units, in column 3, the theoretical optical radius , following Persic et al. [64] equations, in kpc, in column 4, the collapse time scale in the characteristic radius, , in Gyr in column 5, the value which defines the efficiencies (see Equation (7) in Section 2.2) in column 6, and the values for these efficiencies in columns 7 and 8.

(a)

(b)

Figure 1: (a) Dependence of the collapse time scale, , in natural logarithmic scale, (in Gyr) on the galactocentric radius, , in kpc. Each line represents a given maximum rotation velocity, , or radial mass distribution as labeled. The dashed (gray) and dotted (black) lines show the time corresponding to 2 and 5 times, respectively, the age of the Universe,  Gyr. (b) Comparison of the radial dependence of the collapse time scale, , in natural logarithmic scale, for our MWG model, corresponding to , shown by the solid red line, with the radial functions used by Chang et al. [73], Boissier and Prantzos [32], Chiappini et al. [74], Renda et al. [75], Carigi and Peimbert [76], and Marcon-Uchida et al. [35] labeled CHA99, BP99, CHIA01, REN05, CAR08, and MAR10, respectively.

Figure 2: The evolution of the infall gas rate along the redshift for all radial regions of our 44 galaxy mass values represented by the shaded zone. The solid lines show the evolution of the whole infall rate of the same 7 theoretical galaxies shown in Figure 1 with the same color coding. The higher the total mass, the higher the infall rate. Dashed purple and yellow lines represent the prescriptions from Dekel et al. [77] and Faucher-Giguère et al. [78], respectively. The dotted purple lines are the Dekel et al. [77] prescriptions for masses and , while the red hexagon in the present time is the estimated value given by Sancisi et al. [79].

The red line corresponds to a MWG-like radial distribution. The long-dashed black line shows the time corresponding to 2 times the age of the Universe. Such as we may see, the most massive galaxies would have the most extended disks, since the collapse timescale is smaller than the age of the universe for longer radii, thus allowing the formation of the disk until radii as larger as 20 kpc, while the least massive ones would only have time to form the central region, smaller than 1-2 kpc, as observed. The dashed (gray) lines show the time corresponding to 2 times the age of the Universe,  Gyr. The dotted black line defines the collapse time scale for which the maximum radius for the disk of the MWG model would be 13 kpc, the optical radius, and it corresponds to a collapse time scale of 5 times the age of the Universe.

Other authors have also included a radial dependence for the infall rate in their models [23, 26, 27, 52, 80] with different expressions. In fact this dependence, which produces an in-out formation of the disk, is essential to obtain the observed density profiles and the radial gradient of abundances, such as it has been stated before [26, 28, 52]. In Figure 1(b) we show the collapse time scale , in natural logarithmic scale, assumed in different chemical evolution models of MWG, as a function of the galactocentric radius. The red solid line corresponds to our MWG model ( and number 28 of the mass distributions of Table 1) from MD05. The other functions, straight lines, are those used by Chang et al. [73], Boissier and Prantzos [32], Chiappini et al. [74], Renda et al. [75], Carigi and Peimbert [76], and Marcon-Uchida et al. [35], as labeled. Since they use straight lines the collapse time scale for our model results shorter for the inner disk regions (except for the bulge region 3-4 kpc) and longer for the outer ones, than the ones used by the other works. This will have consequences in the radial distributions of stars and elemental abundances as we will see.

2.2. The Star Formation Law in Two-Steps: The Formation of Molecular Gas Phase

The star formation is assumed different in the halo than in the disk. In the halo the star formation follows a Kennicutt-Schmidt law. In the disk, however, we assume a more complicated star formation law, by creating molecular gas from the diffuse gas in a first step, again by a Kennicutt-Schmidt law. And then stars from the cloud-cloud collisions. There is a second way to create stars from the interaction of massive stars with the surrounding molecular clouds.

Therefore the equation system of our model is

These equations predict the time evolution of the different phases of the model: diffuse gas, , molecular gas, , low mass stars, , and intermediate mass and massive stars, , and stellar remnants, , (where letters and correspond to disk and halo, resp.). Stars are divided in 2 ranges, being the low mass stars and the intermediate and massive ones, considering the limit between both ranges stellar a mass . are the mass fractions of the 15 elements considered by the model: H, D, He, He, C, O, N, C, Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ca, and Fe and the rich neutron isotopes created from C, O, N, andC.

Therefore we have different processes defined in the galaxy as follows,

(i)Star formation by spontaneous fragmentation of gas in the halo: , where we use .(ii)Clouds formation by diffuse gas: with too.(iii)Star formation due to cloud collision: .(iv)Diffuse gas restitution due to cloud collision: .(v)Induced star formation due to the interaction between clouds and massive stars: .(vi)Diffuse gas restitution due to the induced star formation: .(vii)Galaxy formation by gas accretion from the halo or protogalaxy: ,

where , , , and are the proportionality factors of the stars and cloud formation and are free input parameters (since stars are divided in two groups: those with and , the parameters are divided in the two groups too; thus, , , ).

Thus, the star formation law in halo and disk is

Although the number of parameters seems to be large, actually not all of them are free. For example, the infall rate, , is the inverse of the collapse time , as we described in the above section. Proportionality factors , , , and have a radial dependence, as we show in the study of MWG Ferrini et al. [28], which may be used in all disks galaxies through the volume of each radial region and some proportionality factors called efficiencies. These efficiencies or proportionality factors of these equations have a probability meaning and therefore their values are in the range [0, 1]. The efficiencies are then the probability of star formation in the halo, , the probability of cloud formation, , cloud collision, , and the interaction between massive stars . This last one has a constant value since it corresponds to a local process. The efficiency to form stars in the halo is also assumed constant for all of them. Thus, the number of free parameters is reduced to and .

The efficiency to form stars in the halo, , is obtained through the selection of the best value to reproduce the SFR and abundances of the Galactic halo (see Ferrini et al. [28], for details). We assumed that it is approximately constant for all halos with a value –6 × 10⁻³. The value for is also obtained from the best value for MWG and assumed as constant for all galaxies since these interactions massive stars-clouds are local processes. The other efficiencies and may take any value in the range [0-1]. From our previous models calculated for external galaxies of different types [81], we found that both efficiencies must change simultaneously in order to reproduce the observations, with higher values for the earlier morphological types and smaller for the later ones. In MD05 there is a clear description about the selection of values and the relation . As a summary, we have calculated these efficiencies with the expressions:

selecting 10 values between 1 and 10 (we suggest to select a value similar to the Hubble type index to obtain model results fitting the observations). The efficiencies values computed for the grid from MD05 are shown in Table 2 from that work.

Table 2: Evolution of different phases along the time/redshift for the grid of models. We show as an example the results for the present time of a MWG-like model (, ). The complete table will be available in electronic format.

(a)

Gyr
kpc
 yr⁻¹
 yr⁻¹
10⁹ 
10⁹ 

4
28

0.00
0

4
28

0.00
2

4
28

0.00
4

4
28

0.00
6

4
28

0.00
8

4
28

0.00
10

4
28

0.00
12

4
28

0.00
14

4
28

0.00
16

4
28

0.00
18

4
28

0.00
20

4
28

0.00
22

4
28

0.00
24

(b)

10⁹ 
10⁹ 
10⁹ 
10⁹ 
10⁹ 
10⁹ 
10⁹ 
10⁹ 
10⁹ 

2.3. Stellar Yields, Initial Mass Function, and Supernova Ia Rates

The selection of the stellar yields and the IMF needs to be done simultaneously since the integrated stellar yield for any element, which defines the absolute level of abundances for a given model, depends on both ingredients. In this work we used the IMF from Ferrini et al. [82] with limits and . The stellar yields are from Woosley and Weaver [83] for massive stars ( and from Gavilán et al. [84, 85] for low and intermediate mass stars (). Stars in the range have no time to die, so they still live today and do not eject any element to the interstellar medium. The mean stellar lifetimes are taken from the isochrones from the Padova group [86–89] instead of using those from the Geneva group Schaller et al. [90]. This change is done for consistency since we use the Padova isochrones on the POPSTAR code that we will use for the spectrophotometric models. The supernova Ia yields are taken from Iwamoto et al. [91]. The combination of these stellar yields with this IMF produces the adequate level of CNO abundances, which is able to reproduce most of observational data in the MWG galaxy [84, 85], in particular the relative abundances of C/O, N/O, and C/Fe, O/Fe, N/Fe. The study of other combinations of IMF and stellar yields will be analyzed in Mollá et al. [92]. The supernova type Ia rates are calculated by using prescriptions from Ruiz-Lapuente et al. [93].

3. Results: Evolution of Disks with Redshift

The chemical evolution models are given in Tables 2 and 3. We show as an example some lines corresponding to the model and , the whole set of results will be given in electronic format as a catalogue. In Table 2 we give the type of efficiencies and the distribution number in columns 1 and 2, the time in Gyr in column 3, the corresponding redshift in column 4, the radius of each disk region in kpc in column 5, and the star formation rate in the halo and in the disk, in , in columns 6 and 7. In next columns 8 and 9 we have the total mass in the halo and in the disk. In columns 10 to 16 we show the mass in each phase of the halo, diffuse gas, low-mass stars, massive stars, and mass in remnants (columns 10 to 13) and of the disk, diffuse and molecular gas, low-mass stars, massive stars, and mass in remnants (columns 14 to 18).

Table 3: Evolution of elemental abundances along the time/redshift for the grid of models. We show as an example the results for the present time of a MWG-like model (, ). The complete table will be available in electronic format.

(a)

3He
4He

Gyr
kpc

4
28

0.00
0

4
28

0.00
2

4
28

0.00
4

4
28

0.00
6

4
28

0.00
8

4
28

0.00
10

4
28

0.00
12

4
28

0.00
14

4
28

0.00
16

4
28

0.00
18

4
28

0.00
20

4
28

0.00
22

4
28

0.00
24

(b)

12C
13C
N
O
Ne
Mg
Si
S
Ca
Fe

We will give the results obtained for our grid of models by showing the corresponding ones to the galaxies from Table 1 as a function of the redshift or of the galactocentric radius. When the radial distributions are plotted, we do that for several times or values of redshifts. We assume that each time in the evolution of a galaxy corresponds to a redshift. To calculate this redshift, we use the relation redshift-evolutionary time given by MacDonald [94] with the cosmological parameters from the same PLANK experiment [69] (), and this way the time assumed for the beginning of the galaxy formation, , corresponds to a redshift .

3.1. The Formation of the Disk

The process of infall of gas from the protogalaxy to the equatorial plane depends on time since the mass remaining in the protogalaxy or halo is decreasing with time. In Figure 2 we represent the resulting total infall of mass for our 44 radial distributions of mass as a function of the redshift . Since this process is defined by the collapse time-scale, the total infall rate for the whole galaxy only depends on the total mass, and therefore there would be only 44 possible results, one for each maximum rotation velocity or mass of the theoretical galaxy. However, since we have assumed an infall rate variable with the radius, each radial region of a galaxy has a different infall rate. We show as a shaded region the locus where our results for all radial regions of the whole set of models fall. Over this region we show as solid lines the results for the whole infall of the same 7 theoretical galaxies as in the previous Figure 1, and with the same color coding, as labeled. The dashed purple and yellow lines correspond to the prescriptions given by Dekel et al. [77] and Faucher-Giguère Maciel et al. [78] for the infall of gas as obtained by their cosmological simulations to form massive galaxies. In both cases these expressions depend on the dynamical halo mass, so we have shown both lines for which will be compared to our most massive model which is on the top (black line) and which has a similar total mass. There are some differences with the results from cosmological simulations for the lowest redshifts, for which our models have lower infall rates than these cosmological simulations. However we remind that these simulations prescriptions are valid for spheroidal galaxies. We show as dotted purple lines 2 other lines following Dekel et al. [77] prescriptions but for masses and , above and below the standard dashed line, checking that this last one is very similar to our cyan line. Therefore to decrease the infall rate for the most recent times is probably a good solution to obtain disks. In fact all our models for —the green line—(i.e., all lines except the orange and magenta ones) coincide in the same locus for the present time and reproduce well the observed value given by Sancisi et al. [79] and represented by the red full hexagon.

As a consequence of this infall of gas scenario, the disk is formed. The proportion of mass in the disk compared with the total dynamical mass of the galaxy is, as expected, dependent on this total mass. In Figure 3 we show the fraction , where is the mass in the disk resulting from the applied collapse time scale prescriptions, as a function of the final mass in the disk. These results, shown as red points, are compared with the line obtained by Mateo [95] for galaxies in the local group, solid cyan line, and with the ratio by Shankar et al. [96] calculated through the halo and the stellar mass distributions in galaxies, solid black line. We also plot the results obtained by Leauthaud et al. [97] from cosmological simulations for three different ranges in redshift, such as those labeled in the figure. Our results have a similar slope to the one from Mateo [95], but the absolute value given by this author is slightly lower, which is probably due to a different value to transform the observations (luminosities) in stellar masses. Our results are close to the ones predicted by Shankar et al. [96] and Leauthaud et al. [97] obtained with different techniques. These authors find in both cases an increase for high disk masses which, obviously, is not apparent in our models, since we have assumed a continuous dependence of the collapse time scale with the dynamical mass. Shankar et al. [96] analyzed the luminosity function of halos and determine the relation with the mass formed there, while Leauthaud et al. [97] compute cosmological simulations and obtain the relation between the dynamical mass and the final mass in their disks. As we say before, disks obtained in simulations are smaller than observed what increases the ratio . Moreover the change of slope in these curves defines the limit in which the elliptical galaxies begin to appear, shown by the dotted black line as given by González Delgado et al. [98]. Therefore it is possible that these authors include some spheroids and galaxies SO in their calculations which are not computed in our models. It is necessary say, however, that the MWG value in this plot is slightly above this limit, and just where the Shankar et al. [96] line change the slope. Taking into account that spirals more massive than MWG there exist, maybe this limits is not totally correct, and that, instead a sharp cut, there is a mix of galaxies in this zone of the plot.

Figure 3: The ratio as a function of the mass in the disk . Our models results are the solid red dots. The cyan and black lines are the results obtained by Mateo [95] and Shankar et al. [96] from observations of the local group of galaxies and from halo data, respectively. Magenta, blue, and green dashed lines are results from Leauthaud et al. [97] for different ranges of redshift as labeled. The MWG point is represented by a blue full triangle and the dotted black line marks the limit between disk and spheroidal galaxies from González Delgado et al. [98].

3.2. The Relation of the SFR with the Molecular Gas

Since the formation of molecular gas is a characteristic which differentiates our model from other chemical evolution models in the literature, we would like to check if our resulting star formation is in agreement with observations. We compare the efficiency to form stars from the gas in phase , measured as , with data in Figure 4. In Figure 4(a) we show the results for a galaxy like MWG, where each colored line represents a different radial region: solid red, yellow, magenta, blue, green, and cyan lines, correspond to radial regions located at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 kpc of the Galactic center in the MWG model. In Figure 4(b) solid black, cyan, red, blue, green, orange, and magenta lines correspond to the galaxies of different dynamical masses and efficiencies given in Table 1 and taken as examples. Observations at intermediate-high redshift by Daddi et al. [99] and Genzel et al. [100] are shown as cyan dots and blue triangles, respectively, while the green squares refer to the local Universe data obtained by Leroy et al. [101]. The red star marks the average given by Sancisi et al. [79].

(a)

(b)

Figure 4: The efficiency to form stars from molecular gas, , in logarithmic scale, as a function of redshift for our grid of models. The evolution with redshift for all radial regions and galaxies is shown by the shaded zone, while solid black points represent the grid results for . (a) Solid black, red, yellow, magenta, blue, green, and cyan lines, correspond to radial regions located at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 kpc of the Galactic center in the MWG model. In (b) solid black, cyan, blue, red, green, orange, and magenta lines correspond to galaxies of different dynamical masses and efficiencies (see Table 1). In (a) and (b) observations at intermediate-high redshift from Daddi et al. [99] and Genzel et al. [100] are shown as cyan dots and blue triangles, respectively, while the green squares refers to the local Universe data obtained by Leroy et al. [101]. The red star marks the average given by Sancisi et al. [79].

3.3. Evolution with Redshift of the Radial Distributions in Disks

In the next figures we show the results corresponding to the seven theoretical galaxies used as examples and whose characteristics are given in Table 1. We have selected 7 galaxies which simulate galaxies along the Hubble sequence. They have different masses and sizes and we have also selected different efficiencies to form stars in order to compare with real galaxies. In the next figures we will show our results for 7 values of evolutionary times or redshifts: , 4, 3, 2, 1, 0.4, and 0, with colors purple, blue, cyan, green, magenta, orange, and red, respectively. The resulting radial distributions in disks for diffuse and molecular gas, stellar mass, and star formation rate for the galaxies from Table 1 are shown in Figure 5. In this figure we show a galaxy in each column and a different quantity in each row. Thus top, top-middle, and bottom-middle panels show the diffuse gas, the molecular gas, and the stellar surface densities, respectively, all in units and in logarithmic scale, while the bottom panel corresponds to the surface density of the star formation rate in .

Figure 5: Evolution with redshift of the surface density of diffuse gas, , molecular gas, , and stellar mass, , in , in top, middle-top, and middle-bottom rows, and the star formation rate, , in , in the bottom one. All in logarithmic scale. Each column shows the results for a theoretical galaxy of the Table 1, from the galaxy, with , to the most massive one for . Each line corresponds to a different redshift: purple, blue, cyan, green, magenta, orange, and red for 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0.4, and 0, respectively.

The radial distributions of diffuse gas density show a maximum in the disk. The radius of the maximum is near the center of the galaxy for and move outwards with the evolution, reaching a radius ~2/3 kpc for the present, that is, 1.3 times , and ~2 the effective radius in mass or radius enclosed the half of the stellar mass of the disk (see next section). The density in this maximum reaches values ~50 in early times or high redshift. For the present, the maximum density is ~10, very similar in most of theoretical galaxies. These radial distributions reproduce very well the observations of HI. The radial distribution for regions beyond this point shows an exponential decrease but flatter now than that in the high-redshift distributions.

The radial distributions of molecular gas density show basically the same behavior, with a maximum in the disks too. In each galaxy, however, this maximum is located slightly closer to the center than the one from the HI distribution. They show an exponential function too, after this maximum. These radial distributions seem more to be an exponential shape with a flattening at the center than the ones from HI which show a clearer maximum, mainly for the least massive galaxies.

The stellar profiles, , show the classical exponential disks. The size of these stellar disks and the scale length of these exponential functions are in agreement with observations. However they present a decreasing or flattening in the inner regions in most cases, although some of them have an abrupt increase just in the center. It is necessary to take into account that these models are calculated to model spiral disks, and the bulges are added by hand without any density radial profile. Probably this produces a behavior not totally consistent with observations at the center of galaxies.

In these three panels we show the results only for densities higher than 0.1 , which corresponds to an atomic density ~ which we consider as a lower limit for observations.

The star formation radial distributions show similar shapes as and , a similar decreasing in the inner regions of disks, too. Although these decreases have been observed in a large number of spiral disks for and SFR distributions [102–104], we think, however, that they are stronger than observed.

From all panels we may say that spiral disks would have a more compact appearance at high redshift with higher values maximum and smaller physical sizes, as correspond to an inside-out disk formation as assumed. The present radial distributions show flatter shapes, with smaller values in the maximum and in the inner disks and higher densities in the outer regions.

The star formation is around 2 orders of magnitude larger at than now for the massive galaxies, in agreement with that estimated of the star formation in the Universe [105], while for the smaller galaxies the maximum value is low and very similar then than now.

In Figure 8 panel (a), we show the same four radial distributions for the lowest mass galaxy in our grid with a maximum rotation velocity of . In this case and taking into account the limit of the observational techniques, we see that the galaxy will be only detected in the region around 1 kpc and only for redshift since for earlier times than this the galaxy will be undetected.

3.4. The Half Mass Radii

Since we know the mass of the disk and the corresponding one to each phase we may follow the increase of the stellar mass in each radial region and calculate for each evolutionary time of redshift the radius for which the stellar mass is the half of the total of the mass in stars in the galaxy, . This radius obviously will evolve with time and since we have assumed an in-out scenario of disk formation, it must increase with it. We show this evolution in Figure 6, where we plot with different colors the evolution of different efficiencies models: black, gray, green, red, orange, magenta, purple, cyan, and blue for sets to 9, respectively, for mass distributions from number 10 to 44, which correspond to maximum rotation velocities in the range to 400. The lowest mass galaxies, with (or those for which efficiencies correspond to ) are not shown since, as we will show in Figure 8, they only would have a visible central region. It is evident that the effective radius increases, being smaller to high redshift, this increase begins later for the later types of smaller efficiencies than for the earlier ones or with high efficiencies. Blue and cyan points are below 1 kpc for redshifts higher than 1, while the others begin to increase already at -6. Moreover a change of slope with an abrupt increase in the size occurs at until , for , when the star formation suffers its maximum value in most of these galaxies which is in agreement with the data. Intermediate galaxies, as magenta and purple dots, which correspond to irregular galaxies show this change of the slope at .

Figure 6: The evolution of the half mass radii, , as a function of the redshift for models with efficiencies sets from to 9 and for mass distribution numbers from 10 to 44 (see Tables 1 and 2 from MD) corresponding to maximum rotation velocities in the range [80–400] . Black, gray, green, red, orange, magenta, purple, cyan, and blue dots correspond to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively.

3.5. Evolution of Elemental Abundances

The resulting elemental abundances are given in Table 3. For each type of efficiencies and mass distribution and columns 1 and 2, we give the time in Gyr in column 3, the corresponding redshift in column 4, and the Radius in Kpc in column 5. The elemental abundances for H, D, He, He, C, C, N, O, Ne, Mg, Si, S, Ca, and Fe are in columns 6 to 19 as fraction in mass.

The radial distributions of elemental abundances are shown in Figure 7. There we have for the same 6 galaxies of Figure 5 from the left to the right column, the abundance evolution for C, N, O, and Fe, as from top to bottom panels. In each panel, as before, we represent the radial distributions for 7 different redshifts, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0.4, and 0, with the same color coding. The well-known decrease from the inner to the outer regions, called the radial gradients of abundances, appear in the final radial distributions for the present time in agreement with data. However the slope is not unique in most of cases. The radial distribution for any element, , is not a straight line but a curve which is flatter in the central region and also in the outer disk in agreement with the most recent observations [18].

Figure 7: Evolution with redshift of radial distributions of elemental abundances, C, N, O, and Fe from top to bottom. Each column shows the results for a theoretical galaxy of Table 1, from the galaxy, with , at left to the most massive one with at the right. In each panel distributions for 7 redshifts are shown, with the same color coding as in Figure 5.

(a)

(b)

Figure 8: (a) Radial distributions of the surface density of diffuse gas, , molecular gas, , and stellar mass, , in , and the star formation rate surface density, , in , all in logarithmic scale, for the least massive galaxy of our example table, with . (b) Evolution with redshift of radial distributions of elemental abundances, C, N, O, and Fe of the same galaxy.

The distributions of abundances change with the level of evolution of a galaxy. A very evolved galaxy, that is, as the one for the most massive ones, and/or those with the highest efficiencies to form stars show flatter radial gradients than those which evolve slowly, which have steeper distributions. There exists a saturation level of abundances, defined by the true yield and given by the combination of stars of a certain range of mass and the production of elements of these stars. For our combination of stellar yields from Woosley and Weaver [83], Gavilán et al. [84], and Gavilán et al. [85] and IMF from Ferrini et al. [82], this level is and 8.2 dex for C, N, O, and Fe, respectively. As the galaxy evolves the saturation level is reached in the outer regions of galaxy, thus flattening the gradient.

The radial gradient flattens with the evolutionary time or redshift, mainly in the most massive galaxies, although it maintains a similar value for the smallest galaxies. The extension in which the radial gradient appears, changes, however, with time. At the earliest time the radial gradient appears only for the central regions, until 1 kpc in the left column galaxy, while it does until 22 kpc in the right one with a change of slope at around 8 kpc. For the radial regions out of this limit, it shows a flat distribution. At the present, this gradient appears until a extended radius, 28 kpc, in our most massive galaxy, while it is only in the inner 4 kpc in the smallest one. If we analyze the results for the lowest mass galaxy in Figure 8, we see that abundances show a very uniform distribution along the galactocentric radius for all elements, with a slight increase at the center for all redshifts that may be considered as a nonexistent radial gradient, within the usual errors bars.

The flat radial gradient in the lowest mass galaxies, as shown in Figure 8, as this one of the most distant regions of the disk in the massive galaxies at the highest redshifts, must be considered as a product of the infall of a gas more rich that this one of the disk. It is necessary to take into account that the halo is forming stars too. When the collapse time is longer, as occurs in the outer regions of disks, there is more time and more gas in the halo to form stars and increase its abundances. Thus, the gas infalling is, even at a very low level (-), more enriched than the gas of the disk.

4. The Photometric Model Description

It is well known that galaxies have SEDs depending on their morphological type [106]. These SEDs and other data related to the stellar phase are usually analyzed through (evolutionary) synthesis models (see [107], for a recent and updated review about these models), based on SSPs created by an instantaneous burst of star formation (SF). The synthesis models began calculating the luminosity (in a broad band filter or as a SED, or by using the spectral absorption indices) for a generation of stars created simultaneously, (therefore, with a same age, , and with a same metallicity, ), that is, the so-called single stellar population (SSP). The evolutionary codes compute the corresponding colors, surface brightness, and/or spectral absorption indices emitted by a SSP from the sum of spectra of all stars created and distributed along a Hertzsprung Russell diagram, weighted with an IMF. This SED, given and , is characteristic of each SSP. This way it is possible to extract some information of the evolution of galaxies by using evolutionary synthesis models in comparison with spectrophotometric observations. This method has been very useful for the study of elliptical galaxies, for which it was developed, with the hypothesis that they are practically SSPs and allowed to advance very much in the knowledge of these objects, determining their age and metallicity with good accurate [86, 108–113].

Star formation history, however, does not always take place in a single burst, as occurs in spiral and irregular galaxies where star formation is continuous or in successive bursts. Since in these galaxies the star formation does not occur in a single burst the SSP SEDs are not good representative of their luminosity. In this case it is necessary to perform a convolution of these SEDs with the star formation history (SFH) of the galaxy, . Thus, spectral evolution models of galaxies predict colors and luminosities of a galaxy as a function of time, as for example Bruzual and Charlot ([114, 115], hereafter GALAXEV), or the ones from Fioc and Rocca-Volmerange [111], and Le Borgne et al. ([116], hereafter PEGASE 1.0 and 2.0, resp.), from the SEDs calculated for the SSPs and also for some possible combinations of them by following a given SFH. Usually some hypotheses about the shape and the intensity of the SFH are assumed; for example, an exponentially decreasing function of time is normally used. However an important point, usually forgotten when this technique is applied is that ; that is, the metallicity changes with time since stars form and die continuously. It is not clear which must be selected at each time step without knowing this function . Usually, only one is used for the whole integration which may be an oversimplification.

Besides the fact that most of these models do not compute the chemical evolution that occurs along the time (or do it in a very simple way), the star formation histories are assumed as inputs. In our approach we may take advantage from the results of the chemical evolution models section, which give us as outputs the SFH and the AMR, and use them as inputs to compute the SED of each galaxy or radial region. For each stellar generation created in the time step , a SSP-SED, , from this set, is chosen taking into account its age, , from the time in which it was created until the present and the metallicity reached by the gas. After convolution with the SFH, , the final SED, , is obtained for each region. This way in a region of each galaxy, the final SED, , corresponds to the light emitted by the successive generations of stars. It may be calculated as the sum of several SSP SEDs, , being weighted by the created stellar mass in each time step, . Thus, for each radial region:

where .

The set of SSP’s SEDs, used are those from the POPSTAR evolutionary synthesis code [62]. The isochrones used in that work are those from Bressan et al. [117] for six different metallicities: , 0.0004, 0.004, 0.008, 0.02, and 0.05, updated and computed for that particular piece of work. The age coverage is from 5.00 to 10.30 with a variable time resolution which is in the youngest stellar ages, doing a total of 106 ages. The WC and WN stars are identified in each isochrone according to their surface abundances. The grid is computed for six different IMFs. Here we have used the set calculated with the IMF from Ferrini et al. [82] to be consistent with the one used in the chemical evolution models grid. To each star in the HR diagram a stellar model is assigned based on the effective temperature and gravity. Stellar atmosphere models are taken from Lejeune et al. [118], due to their expansive coverage in effective temperature, gravity, and metallicities, for stars with  K. For O, B, and WR stars, the NLTE blanketed models of Smith et al. [119] (for metallicities , 0.004, 0.008, 0.02, and 0.04) are used. There are 110 models for O-B stars, calculated by Pauldrach et al. [120], with 25000  K and , and 120 models for WR stars (60 WN and 60 WC), from Hillier and Miller [121], with 30000 K and for WN, and with  K and for WC. and are the temperature and the radius at a Roseland optical depth of 10. The assignment of the appropriate WR model is consistently made by using the relationships between opacity, mass loss, and velocity wind, as described in Mollá et al. [62]. For post-AGB and planetary nebulae (PN) with between 50000 K and 220000 K, the NLTE models from Rauch [122] are taken. For higher temperatures, POPSTAR uses black-bodies. The use of these latter models modifies the resulting intermediate age SEDs. The range of wavelengths are the same as the one from Lejeune et al. [118], from 91 Å to 160 μm.

5. Spectrophotometric Results

5.1. Spectral Energy Distributions

As an example of the technique described in the above section, we show the star formation history and the age metallicity distributions , as , for the characteristic radius, , regions of the galaxies of Table 1 in Figure 9. By using these histories we obtain the resulting for these regions which reproduce reasonably well the SEDs of the sampled galaxies. We have compared our resulting spectra after a time 13.2 Gyr of evolution for the models for galaxies from Table 1 with the known templates for the different morphological types from Coleman et al. [106], Buzzoni et al. [124], and Boselli et al. [125], such as can be seen in Figure 9 where we compared our results with Buzzoni [124]. We have represented galaxies ordered by the galactic mass, with the most massive in the top of the graph and each SED is shifted 2 dex compared with the previous one for the sake of clarity of the figure. There are some differences that probably are related to the fact that we are comparing a whole galaxy SED with the one modeled for a given radial region. With this we try to check that our resulting SEDs are in reasonable agreement with observations. A more detailed comparison with data for different radial regions of disks using both types of information, this one proceeding from the gas, the present state of disks, and the one coming from the stellar populations and represented by the brightness profiles in different broad bands are beyond the scope of this work and will be the objects of the next publication.

(a)

(b)

Figure 9: (a) The star formation and iron enrichment [Fe/H] evolution with redshift for the radial regions located at of models of Table 1. (b) The resulting spectral energy distributions, obtained for the same radial region and galaxy model compared with the fiducial templates from Coleman et al. [106].

In order to use our model grid, we may therefore select the best model able to fit a given observed SED and then see if the corresponding SFH and the AMR of this model are also able to reproduce the present time observational data of SFR and metallicity of the galaxy or of the radial region. We have a SED for each radial region, so we may compare the information coming from different radial regions with our models. When only a spectrum is observed for one galaxy, it is possible to compare with the characteristic radius region or to add all spectra of a galaxy. For dwarf galaxies both methods give equivalent results since only central regions have suffered star formation enough to create visible stellar populations. We show an example of this method in Figure 10(a), where three SEDs from Hunt et al. [123] of BCD galaxies are compared with the characteristic region spectrum of the best model chosen for each one of them. In (b) of the same figure we show the corresponding SFH, , and AMR, , with which the modeled SEDs were computed. The final values are within the error bars of observations for these galaxies, compiled by the same authors. Since each SED is well fitted and, simultaneously, the corresponding present-time data of the galaxy by the same chemical evolution model, we may be confident that these SFH and AMR give us a reliable characterization of the evolutionary history of each galaxy.

(a)

(b)

Figure 10: (a) The resulting spectral energy distributions—red solid lines—obtained to reproduce the observations from Hunt et al. [123]—blue open squares—for three BCD galaxies. (b) The star formation history and age-metallicity relation with which we obtain the SEDs which best fit observed spectra.

It is clear that spiral and irregular galaxies are systems more complex than those represented by SSP’s, and that, in particular, their chemical evolution must be taken into account for a precise interpretation of the spectrophotometric data. On the plus side for these objects the gas phase data are also available and may be used as constraint. What is required then is to determine the possible evolutionary paths followed by a galaxy that arrive at the observed present state, while, simultaneously, reproducing the average photometric properties defined by the possible underlying stellar populations.

5.2. Broad-Band Magnitudes and Color-Color Diagrams

Once the SEDs are obtained for all times/redshifts and radial regions of our whole grid of models, we may calculate the magnitudes in the usual broad-band filters. In this case we have computed these ones in the Johnson and SDSS/SLOAN systems by following the prescriptions given in Girardi et al. [126, 127]. For Johnson-Cousins-Glass magnitudes , , , , , , , , , , and are computed using the definition suitable for photon counting devices [126]. Absolute magnitudes in the AB-SDSS photometric system have been calculated following Girardi et al. [127] and Smith et al. [128]. See more details about this in the refereed works or in Mollá et al. [62] where the magnitudes were obtained for the SSP-SEDs.

The results are absolute magnitudes in the rest-frame of an observed located at distance . Therefore we have not used the distance at which a galaxy given redshift must be nor The results are absolute magnitudes of the wavelength. These effects must be taken into account when observational apparent magnitudes are calculated. In that case it is necessary to calculate the decreasing of the flux due to the distance, to include the -correction and the wavelength redshift.

These absolute magnitudes are given in Table 4, where for each set of efficiencies, defined by in column 1, and for each radial mass distribution, defined by the number given in Table 1 from MD05, , in column 2, we have the evolutionary time, in Gyr, in column 3, and the associated redshift , in column 4, the radius of each radial region, in kpc, in column 5, and the corresponding disk area, , in , in column 6. Then, we have two ultraviolet from the Hubble telescope, and the classical Johnson system magnitudes, , , , , , , , , , , and , and the SLOAN/SDSS magnitudes in the AB system, named , , , , and .

Table 4: Absolute magnitudes evolution along the time/redshift for the grid of models in Johnson and SDSS/SLOAN system.

(a)

4
28
13.201
0.00
0.0
19
−18.920
−18.115
−17.796
−18.015
−18.827

4
28
13.201
0.00
2.0
13
−18.151
−17.351
−17.130
−17.322
−18.112

4
28
13.201
0.00
4.0
25
−19.109
−18.301
−18.021
−18.228
−19.034

4
28
13.201
0.00
6.0
38
−19.953
−18.920
−18.602
−18.749
−19.491

4
28
13.201
0.00
8.0
50
−20.669
−19.358
−18.983
−19.016
−19.618

4
28
13.201
0.00
10.0
63
−20.368
−18.970
−18.578
−18.561
−19.092

4
28
13.201
0.00
12.0
75
−19.554
−18.117
−17.733
−17.691
−18.183

4
28
13.201
0.00
14.0
88
−18.561
−17.088
−16.727
−16.661
−17.112

4
28
13.201
0.00
16.0
100
−17.443
−15.922
−15.580
−15.495
−15.894

4
28
13.201
0.00
18.0
110
−16.149
−14.502
−14.091
−13.969
−14.354

4
28
13.201
0.00
20.0
139
−14.297
−12.508
−11.986
−11.827
−12.212

4
28
13.201
0.00
22.0
140
−11.665
−9.836
−9.223
−9.054
−9.435

4
28
13.201
0.00
24.0
150
−8.545
−6.786
−6.154
−5.971
−6.321

(b)

19.476
−20.100
−20.726
−21.295
−21.526
−21.673
−16.963
−18.537
−19.135
−19.486
−19.720

18.748
−19.353
−19.959
−20.516
−20.741
−20.885
−16.292
−17.832
−18.412
−18.749
−18.969

19.679
−20.295
−20.911
−21.476
−21.704
−21.849
−17.188
−18.747
−19.340
−19.686
−19.914

20.103
−20.700
−21.307
−21.867
−22.095
−22.241
−17.776
−19.235
−19.775
−20.097
−20.316

20.155
−20.701
−21.277
−21.819
−22.041
−22.187
−18.161
−19.429
−19.852
−20.117
−20.310

19.585
−20.096
−20.647
−21.174
−21.392
−21.536
−17.757
−18.938
−19.296
−19.526
−19.700

18.650
−19.136
−19.664
−20.175
−20.386
−20.528
−16.912
−18.050
−18.371
−18.577
−18.734

17.548
−18.005
−18.507
−19.000
−19.204
−19.342
−15.901
−17.000
−17.278
−17.460
−17.598

16.294
−16.718
−17.186
−17.647
−17.836
−17.969
−14.745
−15.807
−16.036
−16.188
−16.304

14.753
−15.151
−15.582
−15.990
−16.151
−16.270
−13.254
−14.269
−14.498
−14.638
−14.728

12.623
−13.018
−13.442
−13.834
−13.985
−14.096
−11.157
−12.122
−12.364
−12.511
−12.592

−9.872
10.303
−10.750
−11.184
−11.358
−11.478
−8.399
−9.346
−9.600
−9.781
−9.884

−6.757
−7.202
−7.658
−8.119
−8.308
−8.435
−5.333
−6.247
−6.482
−6.674
−6.786

We may check that our results for the whole grid are reasonable when comparing them with color-color diagrams as is shown in Figure 11. Colors - versus -, - versus -, - versus -, - versus -, - versus -, and - versus - are represented as blue dots for all regions and galaxies modeled in this works and compared with observational data from Buta and Williams [129] in panel - versus -, from Peletier and Balcells [130] in panel - versus -, and from de Jong [131] in - versus - and - versus -. The standard values for typical galaxies along the Hubble sequence as Sa, Sb, Sc, and Sd taken from Poggianti [132] are also shown, labeled in magenta. In panel - versus - the yellow line corresponds to data from Vitores et al. [133]. Green squares are from Buzzoni [124]. The cyan ones are the results corresponding to the galaxies from Table 1. In fact the dispersion of data is quite large, in particular in the two bottom panels. Probably due to the contribution of the emission lines, which move the points of the standard locus for galaxies in a orthogonal way, such as we have demonstrated in Martín-Manjón et al. [134] and García-Vargas et al. [135], where we added the contribution of the emission lines to the broad band colors in single stellar populations and in star-forming galaxies models.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 11: Color-color diagrams. Colors - versus -, - versus -, - versus -, - versus -, - versus -, and - versus - are represented as blue dots and compared with observational data. The standard values for typical galaxies along the Hubble sequence as Sa, Sb, Sc, and Sd are taken from Poggianti [132] and shown as in magenta letters. In the panel - versus -, the yellow line corresponds to data from Vitores et al. [133], the red dots are from Buta and Williams ([129], BW95) in - versus -, from Peletier and Balcells ([130], PEL96) in panel - versus -, and from de Jong ([131], dJvK96) in - versus - and - versus - panels The green full squares are from [124].

5.3. Brightness and Color Radial Profiles of Disks

As we known the luminosity of each radial region, we may compute the surface brightness as mag arcsec⁻². By assuming that our theoretical galaxies are located at 10 pc, the brightness is

where is the area of each radial region in and the constant value 21.57 is , where Fcon is the factor to convert pc to arcsec.

As said before, we have not computed apparent magnitudes in each redshift and then the relation luminosity distance-redshift is not necessary and the redshift of the wavelength is not taken into account.

Brightness radial profiles are shown in Figure 12 for the same 6 galaxies of Table 1 as shown in Figures 6 and 8. Each column represents a galaxy, from the smallest one () at the left, to the most massive () at the right. Brightness in bands , , , , , , , and of the Johnson system are given from top to bottom. In Figure 13 we show similar radial profiles brightness radial profiles for bands , , , , and in the SDSS/SLOAN system. In each panel the same 7 redshifts as in previous Figures 6 and 8 are shown with the same color coding. The profiles show the usual exponential shapes except for the central/inner regions where a flattening is evident. The results for the disks at are similar to the observed ones. The value of - observed as a common value in the center of most galaxies [65] is found with our models. Profiles are steeper for the highest redshifts, being galaxies less luminous, and disks smaller. As the galaxy evolves, more stellar mass appears and more extended in the disk, doing the profiles more luminous and extended. Thus, in -band, the radius , defined as this one where , is in the most massive galaxy, ~18 kpc for , and is >30 kpc for the present time. While for the left column galaxy, ~ 1 kpc for and ~ 4 kpc for but the brightness do not reach this level at higher redshifts than 3.

Figure 12: Evolution with redshift of surface brightness profiles in , , , , , , , and bands. Each row shows the results for a theoretical galaxy of the Table 1, from the galaxy, with , to the most massive on the bottom for . Lines purple, blue, cyan, green, magenta, orange, and red are for 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0.4, and 0, respectively.

Figure 13: Evolution with redshift of surface brightness profiles for SDSS/SLOAN magnitudes , , , , and . Each row shows the results for a theoretical galaxy of Table 1, from the galaxy, with , to the most massive on the bottom for . Lines purple, blue, cyan, green, magenta, orange, and red are for 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0.4, and 0, respectively.

Again we show separately in Figure 14 the surface brightness profiles for the lowest mass galaxy of our Table 1. It has a very low luminosity in all bands and surface brightness that are difficult to observe even in the local Universe. Only the region around 1 kpc of distance might be observed for .

Figure 14: Evolution of surface brightness profiles for Johnson (, , , , , , , and ) and SDSS/SLOAN (, , , and ) magnitudes radial distributions for the least massive galaxy of Table 1 with .

The radial profiles for some colors are shown in Figures 15 and 16 with similar columns for the same 6 galaxies from table examples as before, the lowest mass at left and the most massive one to the right. These radial distributions do not show uniform evolution doing evident that not all bands evolve equally. Thus, colors -, - in Figure 15 or - and - in Figure 16 show at - an increase their radial distributions located in some place along the disk which varies with the redshift.

Figure 15: Evolution of colors radial profiles for -, -, -, and -. As in previous figures each color represents a redshift while each column is a different theoretical galaxy of Table 1, from the galaxy, with , to the most massive at the right for .

Figure 16: Evolution of colors radial profiles for -, -, -, and -. As in previous figures each color represents a redshift while each column is a different theoretical galaxy of Table 1, from the galaxy, with , to the most massive at the right for .

6. Discussion

One of the things which arises from these models is that elemental abundances do not show exponential radial distributions and therefore it is not easy to fit a straight line in the logarithmic scale and to obtain a radial gradient. The distributions are always flatter on the inner regions than in the disk. It is in the disk region between the bulge and the optical radius (around 2 times the effective radius) where a radial gradient may actually be well defined. In the outer regions of the disk the distributions are flatter again, which is in agreement with recent observations from the CALIFA survey [18]. This flattening is more evident, at shorter radii, for early times or highest redshifts. By taking into account that at these same time/redshifts the stellar profiles continue being steep; it is evident that the abundances do not proceed from the stellar production in the disk. Since the radial gradient is created by the ratio , one possibility is that the infall causes en enrichment in the outer parts of the disks. We must remember that in our models the halos create stars too, with an efficiency . With this value it is possible to reproduce the star formation history and the age-metallicity relation of the Galactic halo. Since the infall rate is very high in the inner regions of the disk, the star formation in the inner halo occurs during a very short time, and then the gas falls towards the disk, and the star formation in the halo stops. Thus, stars in the halo will be old and with low metallicities, as observed. On the contrary, the infall of gas takes places during a longer time in the outer disk, and therefore the corresponding halo maintains a quantity of gas which allows us to have a star formation rate at a certain level along the galaxy life. Thus the gas infalling in the outer disk may be enriched, in a relative term, compared with the extremely low abundances of the outer disk. In order to check this possibility we have computed a model for a theoretical galaxy similar to MWG, which would be the same as the number 5 in Table 1, without star formation rate, that is, with . Resulting radial distributions for both cases may be compared in Figure 17. In (a) we show the standard results, already shown in Figure 8 with the other galaxy examples. In (b) we have the same model with . In the first case the flattening of the radial distributions for the outer disk is evident for all redshifts, although more clearly in the highest ones, while in the bottom panel no flattening in this region appears. The flattening in the inner disk is similar in both cases.

(a)

(b)

Figure 17: Evolution of the radial distributions of oxygen abundance for a MWG-like galaxy (number 5 from Table 1). (a) With a star formation efficiency in the halo, . (b) Without star formation in the halo .

The second result is that radial gradient flattens with the evolution for all galaxies. However the rate with which this occurs is not the same for all of them. Massive galaxies evolve more rapidly flattening very quickly their radial distributions of abundances. Low mass galaxies on the contrary maintain a steep radial gradient for a longer time. On the other hand, this is a generic result when all radial range of the disk is used to compute the radial gradient. By taking into account that the distributions of abundances do not have a unique slope, as we have explained above, we might select different ranges to compute this gradient. That is if we calculate the gradient for all the spatial range, we obtain the red dashed line in Figure 18 for a MWG-like model, similar to our results in Mollá and Diaz [51]. The radial gradient decreases with the evolution. The radial gradient decreases with the evolution. If we select a restricted radial range, computing it only for (which increases with redshift decreasing), then we obtain the solid line results which show a smaller absolute value and less evolution along redshift. It is necessary to remember that other galaxies will have their own radial gradient evolution since each galaxy may evolve in a different way.

Figure 18: Evolution of the radial gradient of oxygen abundance for a MWG-like galaxy (number 5 from Table 1) along the redshift compared with observations. Dots are data from Maciel et al. [136], Rupke et al. [137], Stanghellini et al. [138], Cresci et al. [58], Yuan et al. [59], Queyrel et al. [60], Jones et al. [61], and Maciel et al. [139] as labeled, while lines are simulations from Pilkington et al. [140], Gibson et al. [141], and our old model results for MWG [142], as given in the plot. For this work we have two lines, one obtained by using all the radial range and the other only for disk within the optical radius, that are shown by the short-dashed and solid lines, respectively.

We may compare these results with observational data which are now being published. We do that in Figure 18 where data from Maciel et al. [136], Rupke et al. [137], Stanghellini et al. [138], Cresci et al. [58], Yuan et al. [59], Queyrel et al. [60], Jones et al. [61], and Maciel and Costa [139] are shown. It is evident that not all of them give the same result. Some authors claim that the radial gradient is steeper for early evolutionary times, while others found flat or even positive radial gradient and try to interpret these results with generic scenarios about the formation of galaxies. It is necessary to say again that not all galaxies evolve in the same way, and, furthermore, not all the observations measure the same thing. The radial range of the measurements is important as we have shown before. There are other important observational effects, such as the angular resolution, the signal to noise, or the annular binning that may change the obtained radial gradient, such as it is demonstrated in Yuan et al. [143]. It is necessary to take care of how using these high redshift observations before to extract conclusions. Maybe a method more sure than to estimate oxygen abundance for high redshift is to study planetary nebula (PN), such as Maciel et al. [136], Maciel and Costa [139], and their group do, since PN give to us the radial gradient that a galaxy had some time ago.

7. Conclusions

We have shown a complete grid of chemo-spectro-photometric evolution models calculated for spiral and irregular galaxies. The evolution with redshift is given in the rest-frame of galaxies. We obtain the evolution of the radial gradient of abundances with higher abundances in the inner regions of disks than in the outer ones. These radial gradients flatten with decreasing redshifts, but always there are some outer regions that show no radial gradient, or it is flatter than in the inner disk. These regions are located increasingly far from the center as the evolution takes place. We have also presented the photometric evolution for this same set of theoretical galaxies, given the surface brightness profiles at different evolutionary times or redshifts. Using the surface density of atomic, molecular, or stellar masses, and these surface brightness profiles we may predict observational limits for these quantities for different redshifts. We may also check that the flat radial gradients of abundances in the outer disks do not correspond to a similar flattening of the surface brightness profiles, and therefore the abundances in these regions do not arise by the stellar populations in the disk. We suggest that they are the result of the infall of gas coming from a halo that is in that moment more enriched than the one in the disk. This indicates that the infall law of gas which forms-out the disk has important consequences in the predicted observational characteristics of galaxies at high redshift. Therefore analyzing other possible infall laws is essential and we will do that in the future.

Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by DGICYT Grants AYA2010-21887-C04-02 and 04. Also, partial support from the Comunidad de Madrid under Grant CAM S2009/ESP-1496 (AstroMadrid) is grateful. Mercedes Mollá thanks the kind hospitality and wonderful welcome of the Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas in Sao Paulo, where this work was finished. The author thanks an anonymous referee for many useful comments and suggestions that have greatly improved this paper. The author also acknowledges to B. K. Gibson his kind help with the english version of the paper.

References

D. Lynden-Bell, “The chemical evolution of galaxies,” Vistas in Astronomy, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 299–316, 1975.

B. M. Tinsley, “Evolution of the stars and gas in galaxies,” Fundamentals of Cosmic Physics, vol. 5, pp. 287–388, 1980.

D. D. Clayton, “Galactic chemical evolution—Z versus ln(1/mu) relationship,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 315, pp. 451–459, 1987.

D. D. Clayton, “Nuclear cosmochronology within analytic models of the chemical evolution of the solar neighbourhood,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 234, pp. 1–36, 1988.

J. Sommer-Larsen and Y. Yoshii, “The chemical evolution of star-forming viscous discs,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 238, pp. 133–144, 1989.

M. Peimbert, “Chemical evolution of the galactic intestellar medium: abundance gradients,” in IAU Symposium No. 84, The Large-Scale Characteristics of the Galaxy, p. 307, 1979.

P. A. Shaver, R. X. McGee, L. Newton, A. C. Danks, and S. R. Pottasch, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 204, p. 53, 1983.

M. Fich and M. Silkey, “Abundances in H II regions at the edge of the galaxy,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 366, no. 1, pp. 107–114, 1991.

A. Fitzsimmons, P. L. Dufton, and W. R. J. Rolleston, “A comparison of oxygen and nitrogen abundances in young clusters and associations and in the interstellar gas,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 259, no. 3, pp. 489–493, 1992.

J. M. Vílchez and C. Esteban, “The chemical composition of H II regions in the outer Galaxy,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 280, no. 3, pp. 720–734, 1996.

S. J. Smartt and W. R. J. Rolleston, “The Galactic oxygen abundance gradient,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 481, no. 1, pp. L47–L50, 1997.

A. Afflerbach, E. Churchwell, and M. W. Werner, “Galactic abundance gradients from infrared fine-structure lines in compact H II regions,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 478, no. 1, pp. 190–205, 1997.

C. Esteban, M. Peimbert, S. Torres-Peimbert, J. García-Rojas, and M. Rodríguez, “Faint emission lines and temperature fluctuations in M8,” Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 113–129, 1999.

C. Esteban, M. Peimbert, and S. Torres-Peimbert, “Physical conditions in the partially ionized zone of the Orion nebula,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 342, no. 3, pp. L37–L40, 1999.

C. Esteban, M. Peimbert, S. Torres-Peimbert, and J. García-Rojas, “Chemical composition and temperature fluctuations in M17,” Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 65–83, 1999.

S. J. Smartt, K. A. Venn, P. L. Dufton, D. J. Lennon, W. R. J. Rolleston, and F. P. Keenan, “Chemical abundances in the inner 5 kpc of the Galactic disk,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 367, no. 1, pp. 86–105, 2001.

R. B. C. Henry and G. Worthey, “The distribution of heavy elements in spiral and elliptical galaxies,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, vol. 111, no. 762, pp. 919–945, 1999.

S. F. Sánchez, F. F. Rosales-Ortega, J. Iglesias-Páramo, et al., “A characteristic oxygen abundance gradient in galaxy disks unveiled with CALIFA,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 563, pp. 49–74, 2014.

D. R. Garnett, “Abundances in spiral galaxies: spatial profiles and global correlations,” Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica, vol. 7, p. 58, 1998.

B. E. J. Pagel, “The G-dwarf problem and radio-active cosmochronology,” in Evolutionary Phenomena in Galaxies, p. 201, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1989.

M. Goetz and J. Koeppen, “On abundance gradients in spiral galaxies,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 262, pp. 455–467, 1992.

J. Koeppen, “The evolution of abundance gradients in spiral galaxies,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 281, no. 1, pp. 26–34, 1994.

C. G. Lacey and S. M. Fall, “Chemical evolution of the galactic disk with radial gas flows,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 290, pp. 154–170, 1985.

R. Güsten and P. G. Mezger, “Star formation and abundance gradients in the galaxy,” Vistas in Astronomy, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 159–224, 1982.

A. I. Diaz and M. Tosi, “The chemical evolution of spiral galaxies—the Galaxy, M 31, M 33, M 83 and M 101,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 208, pp. 365–377, 1984.

F. Matteucci and P. Francois, “Galactic chemical evolution—abundance gradients of individual elements,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 239, pp. 885–904, 1989.

F. Ferrini, F. Matteucci, C. Pardi, and U. Penco, “Evolution of spiral galaxies. I. Halo-disk connection for the evolution of the solar neighborhood,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 387, no. 1, pp. 138–151, 1992.

F. Ferrini, M. Mollá, M. C. Pardi, and A. I. Díaz, “Evolution of spiral galaxies. III. Application of the multiphase model to the galactic disk,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 427, no. 2, pp. 745–758, 1994.

L. Carigi, “Chemical evolution of the solar neighborhood with yields dependent on metallicity,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 424, no. 1, pp. 181–188, 1994.

N. Prantzos and O. Aubert, “On the chemical evolution of the galactic disk,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 302, p. 69, 1995.

C. Chiappini, F. Matteucci, and R. Gratton, “The chemical evolution of the galaxy: the two-infall model,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 477, no. 2, pp. 765–780, 1997.

S. Boissier and N. Prantzos, “Chemo-spectrophotometric evolution of spiral galaxies—I. The model and the Milky Way,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 307, no. 4, pp. 857–876, 1999.

R. D. D. Costa, W. J. Maciel, and A. V. Escudero, “Chemical evolution of the Galactic bulge: single and double infall models,” Baltic Astronomy, vol. 17, no. 3-4, pp. 321–335, 2008.

J. Tumlinson, “Chemical evolution in hierarchical models of cosmic structure. II. the formation of the Milky Way stellar halo and the distribution of the oldest stars,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 708, no. 2, pp. 1398–1418, 2010.

M. M. Marcon-Uchida, F. Matteucci, and R. D. D. Costa, “Chemical evolution models for spiral disks: the Milky Way, M 31, and M 33,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 520, no. 20, article A35, 2010.

R. Caimmi, “Simple MCBR models of chemical evolution: an application to the thin and the thick disk,” Serbian Astronomical Journal, vol. 185, pp. 35–51, 2012.

T. Tsujimoto and K. Bekki, “Two-component galactic bulge probed with renewed galactic chemical evolution model,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 747, no. 2, article 125, 2012.

A. Micali, F. Matteucci, and D. Romano, “The chemical evolution of the milky way: the three infall model,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 436, pp. 1648–1658, 2013.

L. Carigi, X. Hernandez, and G. Gilmore, “Chemical evolution models of local dwarf spheroidal galaxies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 334, no. 1, pp. 117–128, 2002.

G. A. Vazquez, L. Carigi, and J. J. Gonzalez, “SPECTRAL: a new evolutionary synthesis code. Application to the irregular Galaxy NGC 1560,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 400, pp. 31–40, 2003.

L. Carigi, P. Colín, and M. Peimbert, “Chemical and photometric evolution of the local group galaxy NGC 6822 in a cosmological context,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 644, no. 2, pp. 924–939, 2006.

L. Magrini, J. M. Vílchez, A. Mampaso, R. L. M. Corradi, and P. Leisy, “The metallicity gradient of M 33: chemical abundances of H II regions,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 470, no. 3, pp. 865–874, 2007.

M. K. Barker and A. Sarajedini, “The stellar populations of M33's outer regions—IV. Inflow history and chemical evolution,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 390, no. 2, pp. 863–880, 2008.

L. Magrini, L. Stanghellini, E. Corbelli, D. Galli, and E. Villaver, “Metal production in M 33: space and time variations,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 512, article A63, 15 pages, 2010.

G. A. Lanfranchi and F. Matteucci, “Chemical evolution models for the dwarf spheroidal galaxies Leo 1 and Leo 2,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 512, article A85, 12 pages, 2010.

L. Hernández-Martínez, L. Carigi, M. Peña, and M. Peimbert, “Planetary nebulae as observational constraints in chemical evolution models for NGC 6822,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 535, article A118, 14 pages, 2011.

X. Kang, R. Chang, J. Yin et al., “The evolution and star-formation history of M33,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 426, pp. 1455–1464, 2012.

D. Romano and E. Starkenburg, “Chemical evolution of Local Group dwarf galaxies in a cosmological context—I. A new modelling approach and its application to the Sculptor dwarf spheroidal galaxy,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 434, no. 1, pp. 471–487, 2013.

F. Robles-Valdez, L. Carigi, and M. Peimbert, “Outside-in stellar formation in the spiral galaxy M33?” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 429, pp. 2351–2360, 2013.

F. Robles-Valdez, L. Carigi, and M. Peimbert, “Star formation efficiency and flatten gradients in M31,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1420

M. Mollá and A. I. Diaz, “A grid of chemical evolution models as a tool to interpret spiral and irregular galaxies data,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 358, pp. 521–543, 2005.

S. Boissier and N. Prantzos, “Chemo-spectrophotometric evolution of spiral galaxies—II. Main properties of present-day disc galaxies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 312, no. 2, pp. 398–416, 2000.

U. Fritze-Von Alvensleben, P. Weilbacher, and J. Bicker, “Chemically consistent evolutionary synthesis,” Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 284, no. 2, pp. 893–896, 2003.

J. Bicker, U. F.-V. Alvensleben, C. S. Möller, and K. J. Fricke, “Chemically consistent evolution of galaxies. II. Spectrophotometric evolution from zero to high redshift,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 413, no. 1, pp. 37–48, 2004.

R. Kotulla, U. Fritze, P. Weilbacher, and P. Anders, “Galev evolutionary synthesis models—I. Code, input physics and web interface,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 396, no. 1, pp. 462–484, 2009.

N. Prantzos and S. Boissier, “Chemo-spectrophotometric evolution of spiral galaxies—III. Abundance and colour gradients in discs,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 313, no. 2, pp. 338–346, 2000.

S. Boissier, A. Boselli, N. Prantzos, and G. Gavazzi, “Chemo-spectrophotometric evolution of spiral galaxies—IV. Star formation efficiency and effective ages of spirals,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 321, no. 4, pp. 733–742, 2001.

G. Cresci, F. Mannucci, R. Maiolino, A. Marconi, A. Gnerucci, and L. Magrini, “Gas accretion as the origin of chemical abundance gradients in distant galaxies,” Nature, vol. 467, no. 7317, pp. 811–813, 2010.

T.-T. Yuan, L. J. Kewley, A. M. Swinbank, J. Richard, and R. C. Livermore, “Metallicity gradient of a lensed face-on spiral galaxy at redshift 1.49,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 732, no. 1, article L14, 2011.

J. Queyrel, T. Contini, M. Kissler-Patig, et al., “MASSIV: Mass Assembly Survey with SINFONI in VVDS III. Evidence for positive metallicity gradients in star-forming galaxies,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 539, article A93, 12 pages, 2012.

T. Jones, R. S. Ellis, J. Richard, and E. Jullo, “The origin and evolution of metallicity gradients: probing the mode of mass assembly at ,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 765, p. 48, 2013.

M. Mollá, M. L. García-Vargas, and A. Bressan, “PopStar I: evolutionary synthesis model description,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 398, no. 1, pp. 451–470, 2009.

J. Lequeux, “Rotation curves and masses of galaxies,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 125, no. 2, p. 394, 1983.

M. Persic, P. Salucci, and F. Stel, “The universal rotation curve of spiral galaxies—I. the dark matter connection,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 281, no. 1, pp. 27–47, 1996.

K. C. Freeman, “On the disks of spiral and so galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 160, p. 811, 1970.

M. Balcells, A. W. Graham, and R. F. Peletier, “Galactic bulges from hubble space telescope NICMOS observations: global scaling relations,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 665, no. 2, pp. 1104–1114, 2007.

O. J. Eggen, D. Lynden-Bell, and A. R. Sandage, “Evidence from the motions of old stars that the galaxy collapsed,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 525, no. 1, pp. 962–982, 1999.

J. S. Gallagher III, D. A. Hunter, and A. V. Tutukov, “Star formation histories of irregular galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 284, pp. 544–556, 1984.

P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, et al., “Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters,” Astronomy & Astrophysics. In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5076

R. Jimenez, B. Panter, A. F. Heavens, and L. Verde, “Baryonic conversion tree: the global assembly of stars and dark matter in galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 356, no. 2, pp. 495–501, 2005.

A. Heavens, B. Panter, R. Jimenez, and J. Dunlop, “The star-formation history of the Universe from the stellar populations of nearby galaxies,” Nature, vol. 428, no. 6983, pp. 625–627, 2004.

E. Pérez, R. Cid Fernandes, R. M. González Delgado, et al., “The evolution of galaxies resolved in space and time: a view of inside-out growth from the CALIFA survey,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 764, p. L1, 2013.

R. X. Chang, J. L. Hou, C. G. Shu, and C. Q. Fu, “Two-component model for the chemical evolution of the Galactic disk,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 350, no. 1, pp. 38–48, 1999.

C. Chiappini, F. Matteucci, and D. Romano, “Abundance gradients and the formation of the milky way,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 554, no. 2, pp. 1044–1058, 2001.

A. Renda, D. Kawata, Y. Fenner, and B. K. Gibson, “Contrasting the chemical evolution of the Milky way and Andromeda,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 356, no. 3, pp. 1071–1078, 2005.

L. Carigi and M. Peimbert, “The helium and heavy elements enrichment of the Galactic disk,” Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 341–354, 2008.

A. Dekel, R. Sari, and D. Ceverino, “Formation of massive galaxies at high redshift: cold streams, clumpy disks, and compact spheroids,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 703, no. 1, pp. 785–801, 2009.

C.-A. Faucher-Giguère, D. Kereš, and C.-P. Ma, “The baryonic assembly of dark matter haloes,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 417, pp. 2982–2999, 2011.

R. Sancisi, F. Fraternali, T. Oosterloo, and T. Van Der Hulst, “Cold gas accretion in galaxies,” Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 189–223, 2008.

L. Portinari, C. Chiosi, and A. Bressan, “Galactic chemical enrichment with new metallicity dependent stellar yields,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 334, no. 2, pp. 505–539, 1998.

M. Mollá, F. Ferrini, and A. I. Díaz, “Evolution of spiral galaxies. VI. Radial distributions of abundances in external galaxies,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 466, no. 2, pp. 668–685, 1996.

F. Ferrini, F. Palla, and U. Penco, “Bimodality versus multimodality—do fragmentation theories support a bimodal IMF?” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 213, pp. 391–403, 1990.

S. E. Woosley and T. A. Weaver, “The evolution and explosion of massive stars. II. Explosive hydrodynamics and nucleosynthesis,” Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 181–235, 1995.

M. Gavilán, J. F. Buell, and M. Mollá, “Low and intermediate mass star yields: the evolution of carbon abundances,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 432, pp. 861–877, 2005.

M. Gavilán, M. Mollá, and J. F. Buell, “Low and intermediate mass star yields II. The evolution of nitrogen abundances,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 450, pp. 509–521, 2006.

A. Bressan, C. Chiosi, and F. Fagotto, “Spectrophotometric evolution of elliptical galaxies. I. Ultraviolet excess and color-magnitude-redshift relations,” Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 63–115, 1994.

F. Fagotto, A. Bressan, G. Bertelli, and C. Chiosi, “Evolutionary sequences of stellar models with new radiative opacities. IV. Z = 0.004 and Z = 0.008,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 105, pp. 29–38, 1994.

F. Fagotto, A. Bressan, G. Bertelli, and C. Chiosi, “Evolutionary sequences of stellar models with new radiative opacities. III. Z = 0.0004 and Z = 0.05,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 104, pp. 365–376, 1994.

L. Girardi, A. Bressan, C. Chios, G. Bertelli, and E. Nasi, “Evolutionary sequences of stellar models with new radiative opacities. VI. Z = 0.0001,” Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 113–125, 1996.

G. Schaller, D. Schaerer, G. Meynet, and A. Maeder, “New grids of stellar models from 0.8 to 120 solar masses at Z = 0.020 and Z = 0.001,” Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 269–331, 1992.

K. Iwamoto, F. Brachwiz, K. Nomoto, et al., “Nucleosynthesis in chandrasekhar mass models for type Ia supernovae and constraints on progenitor systems and burning-front propagation,” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, vol. 125, no. 2, p. 439, 1999.

M. Mollá, O. Cavichia, M. Gavilán, and B. K. Gibson, “Chemical evolution models: stellar yields, initial mass function and true integrated yields,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. to be submitted

P. Ruiz-Lapuente, S. Blinnikov, R. Canal et al., “Type IA supernova progenitors,” Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana, vol. 71, pp. 435–447, 2000.

A. MacDonald, “Comment on the cosmic time in terms of the redshift,” Foundations of Physics Letters, vol. 19, pp. 631–632, 2006.

M. Mateo, “Dwarf galaxies of the Local Group,” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 435–506, 1998.

F. Shankar, A. Lapi, P. Salucci, G. De Zotti, and L. Danese, “New relationships between galaxy properties and host halo mass, and the role of feedbacks in galaxy formation,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 643, no. 1, pp. 14–25, 2006.

A. Leauthaud, et al., “A weak lensing study of X-ray groups in the cosmos survey: form and evolution of the mass-luminosity relation,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 709, no. 1, p. 97, 2010.

R. M. González Delgado, E. Pérez, R. Cid Fernandes, et al., “The star formation history of CALIFA galaxies: radial structures,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 562, pp. 47–72, 2014.

E. Daddi, F. Bournaud, F. Walter et al., “Very high gas fractions and extended gas reservoirs in z = 1.5 Disk galaxies,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 713, no. 1, pp. 686–707, 2010.

R. Genzel, L. J. Tacconi, J. Gracia-Carpio et al., “A study of the gas-star formation relation over cosmic time,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 407, no. 4, pp. 2091–2108, 2010.

A. K. Leroy, F. Walter, E. Brinks et al., “The star formation efficiency in nearby galaxies: measuring where gas forms stars effectively,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 136, no. 6, pp. 2782–2845, 2008.

C. L. Martin and R. C. Kennicutt Jr., “Star formation thresholds in galactic disks,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 555, no. 1, pp. 301–321, 2001.

K. Nishiyama and N. Nakai, “CO survey of nearby spiral galaxies with the Nobeyama 45-m telescope: I. The data,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 713–756, 2001.

M. W. Regan, M. D. Thornley, T. T. Helfer et al., “The BIMA survey of nearby galaxies. I. The radial distribution of CO emission in spiral galaxies,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 561, no. 1, pp. 218–237, 2001.

K. Glazebrook, C. Blake, F. Economou, S. Lilly, and M. Colless, “Measurement of the star formation rate from Hα in field galaxies at z = 1,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 306, no. 4, pp. 843–856, 1999.

G. D. Coleman, C.-C. Wu, and D. W. Weedman, “Colors and magnitudes predicted for high redshift galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, vol. 43, pp. 393–416, 1980.

C. Conroy, “Modeling the panchromatic spectral energy distributions of galaxies,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 51, pp. 393–455, 2013.

S. Charlot and A. G. Bruzual, “Stellar population synthesis revisited,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 367, pp. 126–140, 1991.

A. G. Bruzual and S. Charlot, “Spectral evolution of stellar populations using isochrone synthesis,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 405, no. 2, pp. 538–553, 1993.

G. Worthey, “Comprehensive stellar population models and the disentanglement of age and metallicity effects,” Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 107–149, 1994.

M. Fioc and B. Rocca-Volmerange, “PEGASE: a UV to NIR spectral evolution model of galaxies: application to the calibration of bright galaxy counts,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 326, no. 3, pp. 950–962, 1997.

R. M. González Delgado and C. Leitherer, “Synthetic spectra of H Balmer and He I absorption lines. I. Stellar library,” Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 479–488, 1999.

A. Vazdekis, “Evolutionary stellar population synthesis at 2 Å spectral resolution,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 513, no. 1, pp. 224–241, 1999.

A. G. Bruzual and S. Charlot, “Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 344, no. 4, pp. 1000–1028, 2003.

G. Bruzual and S. Charlot, “GALAXEV: evolutionary stellar population synthesis models,” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1104.005, http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.4376, 2011

D. Le Borgne, B. Rocca-Volmerange, P. Prugniel, A. Lançon, M. Fioc, and C. Soubiran, “Evolutionary synthesis of galaxies at high spectral resolution with the code PEGASE-HR metallicity and age tracers,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 425, no. 3, pp. 881–897, 2004.

A. Bressan, G. L. Granato, and L. Silva, “Modelling intermediate age and old stellar populations in the infrared,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 332, no. 1, pp. 135–148, 1998.

Th. Lejeune, F. Cuisinier, and R. Buser, “A standard stellar library for evolutionary synthesis—I. Calibration of theoretical spectra,” Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, vol. 125, p. 229, 1997.

L. J. Smith, R. P. F. Norris, and P. A. Crowther, “Realistic ionizing fluxes for young stellar populations from 0.05 to 2 Z⊙,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 337, no. 4, pp. 1309–1328, 2002.

A. W. A. Pauldrach, T. L. Hoffmann, and M. Lennon, “Radiation-driven winds of hot luminous stars. XIII. A description of NLTE line blocking and blanketing towards realistic models for expanding atmospheres,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 375, no. 1, pp. 161–195, 2001.

D. J. Hillier and D. L. Miller, “The treatment of non-LTE line blanketing in spherically expanding outflows,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 496, no. 1, pp. 407–427, 1998.

T. Rauch, “A grid of synthetic ionizing spectra for very hot compact stars from NLTE model atmospheres,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 403, no. 2, pp. 709–714, 2003.

L. Hunt, S. Bianchi, and R. Maiolino, “The optical-to-radio spectral energy distributions of low-metallicity blue compact dwarf galaxies,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 434, no. 3, pp. 849–866, 2005.

A. Buzzoni, “Broad-band colours and overall photometric properties of template galaxy models from stellar population synthesis,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 361, no. 2, pp. 725–742, 2005.

A. Boselli, G. Gavazzi, and G. Sanvito, “UV to radio centimetric spectral energy distributions of optically-selected late-type galaxies in the Virgo cluster,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 402, no. 1, pp. 37–51, 2003.

L. Girardi, G. Bertelli, A. Bressan et al., “Theoretical isochrones in several photometric systems I. Johnson-Cousins-Glass, HST/WFPC2, HST/NICMOS, Washington, and ESO imaging survey filter sets,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 391, no. 1, pp. 195–212, 2002.

L. Girardi, E. K. Grebel, M. Odenkirchen, and C. Chiosi, “Theoretical isochrones in several photometric systems II. The sloan digital sky survey ugriz system,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 422, no. 1, pp. 205–215, 2004.

J. A. Smith, D. L. Tucker, S. Kent, et al., “The ugriz standard-star system,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 2121–2144, 2002.

R. Buta and K. L. Williams, “Total and effective colors of 501 galaxies in the cousins VRI photometric system,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 543–557, 1995.

R. F. Peletier and M. Balcells, “Ages of galaxy bulges and disks from optical and near-infrared colors,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 2238–2242, 1996.

R. S. De Jong, “Near-infrared and optical broadband surface photometry of 86 face-on disk dominated galaxies. IV. Using color profiles to study stellar and dust content of galaxies,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 313, no. 2, pp. 377–395, 1996.

B. M. Poggianti, “K and evolutionary corrections from UV to IR,” Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 399–407, 1997.

A. G. Vitores, J. Zamorano, M. Rego, O. Alonso, and J. Gallego, “Photometric and morphological analysis of UCM galaxies I. Observations and reductions. Morphological classifications,” Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 7–34, 1996.

M. L. Martín-Manjón, M. Mollá, A. I. Díaz, and R. Terlevich, “Evolution of star-forming dwarf galaxies: characterizing the star formation scenarios,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 420, no. 2, pp. 1294–1308, 2012.

M. L. García-Vargas, M. Mollá, and M. L. Martín-Manjón, “popstar evolutionary synthesis models—III. Photometric properties of young star clusters and mixed populations,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 432, pp. 2746–2772, 2013.

W. J. Maciel, R. D. D. Costa, and M. M. M. Uchida, “An estimate of the time variation of the O/H radial gradient from planetary nebulae,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 397, no. 2, pp. 667–674, 2003.

D. S. N. Rupke, L. J. Kewley, and L.-H. Chien, “Gas-phase oxygen gradients in strongly interacting galaxies. I. Early-stage interactions,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 723, no. 2, pp. 1255–1271, 2010.

L. Stanghellini, L. Magrini, E. Villaver, and D. Galli, “The population of planetary nebulae and H II regions in M 81,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 521, article A3, 12 pages, 2010.

W. J. Maciel and R. D. D. Costa, “Time variation of the O/H radial gradient in the galactic disk based on planetary nebulae,” Revista Mexicana de Astronomía y Astrofísica, vol. 49, pp. 333–343, 2013.

K. Pilkington, B. K. Gibson, C. B. Brook, et al., “The distribution of metals in cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of dwarf disc galaxies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 425, no. 2, pp. 969–978, 2012.

B. K. Gibson, K. Pilkington, C. B. Brook, G. S. Stinson, and J. Bailin, “Constraining sub-grid physics with high-redshift spatially-resolved metallicity distributions,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 554, article A47, 5 pages, 2013.

M. Mollá, F. Ferrini, and A. I. Diaz, “Evolution of spiral galaxies. VII. Time evolution of the radial distributions of abundances,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 475, p. 519, 1997.

T.-T. Yuan, L. J. Kewley, and J. Rich, “Systematics in metallicity gradient measurements. I. Angular resolution, signal to noise, and annular binning,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 767, p. 106, 2013.