Using fixed point method, we prove the generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of the following
additive-quadratic-cubic-quartic functional equation f(x+2y)+f(x−2y)=4f(x+y)+4f(x−y)−6f(x)+f(2y)+f(−2y)−4f(y)−4f(−y) in non-Archimedean Banach spaces.
1. Introduction and Preliminaries
A valuation is a function |·| from a field K into [0,∞) such that 0 is the unique element having the 0 valuation, |rs|=|r|·|s|, and the triangle inequality holds, that is, |r+s|≤|r|+|s|,∀r,s∈K.
A field K is called a valued field if K carries a valuation. The usual absolute values of ℝ and ℂ are examples of valuations.
Let us consider a valuation which satisfies a stronger condition than the triangle inequality. If the triangle inequality is replaced by |r+s|≤max{|r|,|s|},∀r,s∈K,
then the function |·| is called a non-Archimedean valuation, and the field is called a non-Archimedean field. Clearly |1|=|-1|=1 and |n|≤1 for all n∈ℕ. A trivial example of a non-Archimedean valuation is the function |·| taking everything except for 0 into 1 and |0|=0.
Throughout this paper, we assume that the base field is a non-Archimedean field, hence call it simply a field.
Definition 1.1 (see [1]).
Let X be a vector space over a field K with a non-Archimedean valuation |·|. A function ∥·∥:X→[0,∞) is said to be a non-Archimedean norm if it satisfies the following conditions:
∥x∥=0 if and only if x=0;
∥rx∥=|r|∥x∥(r∈K,x∈X);
the strong triangle inequality
∥x+y∥≤max{∥x∥,∥y∥},∀x,y∈X
holds. Then (X,∥·∥) is called a non-Archimedean normed space.
Definition 1.2.
(i) Let {xn} be a sequence in a non-Archimedean normed space X. Then the sequence {xn} is called Cauchy if for a given ɛ>0, there is a positive integer N such that
∥xn-xm∥≤ɛ
for all n,m≥N.
(ii) Let {xn} be a sequence in a non-Archimedean normed space X. Then the sequence {xn} is called convergent if for a given ɛ>0, there are a positive integer N and an x∈X such that∥xn-x∥≤ɛ
for all n≥N. Then we call x∈X a limit of the sequence {xn}, and denote it bylimn→∞xn=x.
(iii) If every Cauchy sequence in X converges, then the non-Archimedean normed space X is called a non-Archimedean Banach space.
The stability problem of functional equations originated from a question of Ulam [2] concerning the stability of group homomorphisms. Hyers [3] gave a first affirmative partial answer to the question of Ulam for Banach spaces. Hyers' Theorem was generalized by Aoki [4] for additive mappings and by Rassias [5] for linear mappings by considering an unbounded Cauchy difference. The paper of Rassias [5] has provided a lot of influence in the development of what we call generalized Hyers-Ulam stability or as Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of functional equations. A generalization of the Rassias theorem was obtained by Găvruţa [6] by replacing the unbounded Cauchy difference by a general control function in the spirit of Rassias' approach.
The functional equation f(x+y)+f(x-y)=2f(x)+2f(y)
is called a quadratic functional equation. In particular, every solution of the quadratic functional equation is said to be a quadratic mapping. A generalized Hyers-Ulam stability problem for the quadratic functional equation was proved by Skof [7] for mappings f:X→Y, where X is a normed space and Y is a Banach space. Cholewa [8] noticed that the theorem of Skof is still true if the relevant domain X is replaced by an Abelian group. Czerwik [9] proved the generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of the quadratic functional equation.
In [10], Jun and Kim considered the following cubic functional equation: f(2x+y)+f(2x-y)=2f(x+y)+2f(x-y)+12f(x),
which is called a cubic functional equation and every solution of the cubic functional equation is said to be a cubic mapping. In [11], Lee et al. considered the following quartic functional equation: f(2x+y)+f(2x-y)=4f(x+y)+4f(x-y)+24f(x)-6f(y),
which is called a quartic functional equation and every solution of the quartic functional equation is said to be a quartic mapping.
The stability problems of several functional equations have been extensively investigated by a number of authors and there are many interesting results concerning this problem (see [12–27]).
Let X be a set. A function d:X×X→[0,∞] is called a generalized metric on X if d satisfies
d(x,y)=0 if and only if x=y;
d(x,y)=d(y,x) for all x,y∈X;
d(x,z)≤d(x,y)+d(y,z) for all x,y,z∈X.
We recall a fundamental result in fixed point theory.
Theorem 1.3 (see [28, 29]).
Let (X,d) be a complete generalized metric space and let J:X→X be a strictly contractive mapping with Lipschitz constant L<1. Then for each given element x∈X, either
d(Jnx,Jn+1x)=∞
for all nonnegative integers n or there exists a positive integer n0 such that
d(Jnx,Jn+1x)<∞,foralln≥n0;
the sequence {Jnx} converges to a fixed point y* of J;
y* is the unique fixed point of J in the set Y={y∈X∣d(Jn0x,y)<∞};
d(y,y*)≤(1/(1-L))d(y,Jy) for all y∈Y.
In 1996, Isac and Rassias [30] were the first to provide applications of stability theory of functional equations for the proof of new fixed point theorems with applications. By using fixed point methods, the stability problems of several functional equations have been extensively investigated by a number of authors (see [31–36]).
This paper is organized as follows: in Section 2, using the fixed point method, we prove the generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of the additive-quadratic-cubic-quartic functional equationf(x+2y)+f(x-2y)=4f(x+y)+4f(x-y)-6f(x)+f(2y)+f(-2y)-4f(y)-4f(-y)
in non-Archimedean Banach spaces for an odd case. In Section 3, using the fixed point method, we prove the generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of the additive-quadratic-cubic-quartic functional equation (1.10) in non-Archimedean Banach spaces for an even case.
Throughout this paper, assume that X is a non-Archimedean normed vector space and that Y is a non-Archimedean Banach space.
2. Generalized Hyers-Ulam Stability of the Functional Equation (1.10): An Odd Case
One can easily show that an odd mapping f:X→Y satisfies (1.10) if and only if the odd mapping f:X→Y is an additive-cubic mapping, that is, f(x+2y)+f(x-2y)=4f(x+y)+4f(x-y)-6f(x).
It was shown in Lemma 2.2 of [37] that g(x):=f(2x)-2f(x) and h(x):=f(2x)-8f(x) are cubic and additive, respectively, and that f(x)=(1/6)g(x)-(1/6)h(x).
One can easily show that an even mapping f:X→Y satisfies (1.10) if and only if the even mapping f:X→Y is a quadratic-quartic mapping, that is, f(x+2y)+f(x-2y)=4f(x+y)+4f(x-y)-6f(x)+2f(2y)-8f(y).
It was shown in Lemma 2.1 of [38] that g(x):=f(2x)-4f(x) and h(x):=f(2x)-16f(x) are quartic and quadratic, respectively, and that f(x)=(1/12)g(x)-(1/12)h(x).
For a given mapping f:X→Y, we define Df(x,y):=f(x+2y)+f(x-2y)-4f(x+y)-4f(x-y)+6f(x)-f(2y)-f(-2y)+4f(y)+4f(-y)
for all x,y∈X.
We prove the generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of the functional equation Df(x,y)=0 in non-Archimedean Banach spaces: an odd case.
Theorem 2.1.
Let φ:X2→[0,∞) be a function such that there exists an L<1 with
φ(x,y)≤L|8|φ(2x,2y)
for all x,y∈X. Let f:X→Y be an odd mapping satisfying
∥Df(x,y)∥≤φ(x,y)
for all x,y∈X. Then there is a unique cubic mapping C:X→Y such that
∥f(2x)-2f(x)-C(x)∥≤L|8|-|8|Lmax{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x)}
for all x∈X.
Proof.
Letting x=y in (2.5), we get
∥f(3y)-4f(2y)+5f(y)∥≤φ(y,y)
for all y∈X.
Replacing x by 2y in (2.5), we get∥f(4y)-4f(3y)+6f(2y)-4f(y)∥≤φ(2y,y)
for all y∈X.
By (2.7) and (2.8),∥f(4y)-10f(2y)+16f(y)∥≤max{∥4(f(3y)-4f(2y)+5f(y))∥,∥f(4y)-4f(3y)+6f(2y)-4f(y)∥}≤max{|4|·∥f(3y)-4f(2y)+5f(y)∥,∥f(4y)-4f(3y)+6f(2y)-4f(y)∥}≤max{|4|φ(y,y),φ(2y,y)}
for all y∈X.
Letting y:=x/2 and g(x):=f(2x)-2f(x) for all x∈X, we get∥g(x)-8g(x2)∥≤max{|4|φ(x2,x2),φ(x,x2)}
for all x∈X.
Consider the setS:={g:X→Y},
and introduce the generalized metric on Sd(g,h)=inf{μ∈ℝ+:∥g(x)-h(x)∥≤μ(max{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x),∀x∈X})},
where, as usual, infϕ=+∞. It is easy to show that (S,d) is complete. (See the proof of Lemma 2.1 of [39].)
Now we consider the linear mapping J:S→S such thatJg(x):=8g(x2)
for all x∈X.
Let g,h∈S be given such that d(g,h)=ɛ. Then∥g(x)-h(x)∥≤ɛ·max{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x)}
for all x∈X. Hence
∥Jg(x)-Jh(x)∥=∥8g(x2)-8h(x2)∥≤|8|ɛL|8|max{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x)}
for all x∈X. So d(g,h)=ɛ implies that d(Jg,Jh)≤Lɛ. This means that
d(Jg,Jh)≤Ld(g,h)
for all g,h∈S.
It follows from (2.10) that∥g(x)-8g(x2)∥≤L|8|(max{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x)})
for all x∈X. So d(g,Jg)≤L/|8|.
By Theorem 1.3, there exists a mapping C:X→Y satisfying the following.
(1) C is a fixed point of J, that is,C(x2)=18C(x)
for all x∈X. The mapping C is a unique fixed point of J in the set
M={h∈S:d(g,h)<∞}.
This implies that C is a unique mapping satisfying (2.18) such that there exists a μ∈(0,∞) satisfying
∥g(x)-C(x)∥≤μ·max{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x)}
for all x∈X; since g:X→Y is odd, C:X→Y is an odd mapping.
(2) d(Jng,C)→0 as n→∞. This implies the equalitylimn→∞8ng(x2n)=C(x)
for all x∈X.
(3) d(g,C)≤(1/(1-L))d(g,Jg), which implies the inequalityd(g,C)≤L|8|-|8|L.
This implies that the inequality (2.6) holds.
By (2.5),∥8nDg(x2n,y2n)∥≤|8|nmax{φ(2x2n,2y2n),|2|φ(x2n,y2n)}
for all x,y∈X and all n∈ℕ. So
∥8nDg(x2n,y2n)∥≤|8|nLn|8|nmax{φ(2x,2y),|2|φ(x,y)}
for all x,y∈X and all n∈ℕ. So
∥DC(x,y)∥=0
for all x,y∈X. Thus the mapping C:X→Y is cubic, as desired.
Corollary 2.2.
Let θ and p be positive real numbers with p<3. Let f:X→Y be an odd mapping satisfying
∥Df(x,y)∥≤θ(∥x∥p+∥y∥p)
for all x,y∈X. Then there exists a unique cubic mapping C:X→Y such that
∥f(2x)-2f(x)-C(x)∥≤max{2·|4|,|2|p+1}θ|2|p-|8|∥x∥p
for all x∈X.
Proof.
The proof follows from Theorem 2.1 by taking
φ(x,y):=θ(∥x∥p+∥y∥p)
for all x,y∈X. Then we can choose L=|8|/|2|p and we get the desired result.
Theorem 2.3.
Let φ:X2→[0,∞) be a function such that there exists an L<1 with
φ(x,y)≤|8|Lφ(x2,y2)
for all x,y∈X. Let f:X→Y be an odd mapping satisfying (2.5). Then there is a unique cubic mapping C:X→Y such that
∥f(2x)-2f(x)-C(x)∥≤1|8|-|8|Lmax{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x)}
for all x∈X.
Proof.
It follows from (2.10) that
∥g(x)-18g(2x)∥≤1|8|max{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x)}
for all x∈X.
The rest of the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.1.
Theorem 2.4.
Let φ:X2→[0,∞) be a function such that there exists an L<1 with
φ(x,y)≤L|2|φ(2x,2y)
for all x,y∈X. Let f:X→Y be an odd mapping satisfying (2.5). Then there is a unique additive mapping A:X→Y such that
∥f(2x)-8f(x)-A(x)∥≤L|2|-|2|Lmax{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x)}
for all x∈X.
Proof.
Letting y:=x/2 and g(x):=f(2x)-8f(x) for all x∈X in (2.9), we get
∥g(x)-2g(x2)∥≤max{|4|φ(x2,x2),φ(x,x2)}
for all x∈X.
The rest of the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.1.
Corollary 2.5.
Let θ and p be positive real numbers with p<1. Let f:X→Y be an odd mapping satisfying (2.26). Then there exists a unique additive mapping C:X→Y such that
∥f(2x)-8f(x)-A(x)∥≤max{2·|4|,|2|p+1}θ|2|p-|2|∥x∥p
for all x∈X.
Proof.
The proof follows from Theorem 2.4 by taking
φ(x,y):=θ(∥x∥p+∥y∥p)
for all x,y∈X. Then we can choose L=|2|/|2|p and we get the desired result.
Theorem 2.6.
Let φ:X2→[0,∞) be a function such that there exists an L<1 with
φ(x,y)≤|2|Lφ(x2,y2)
for all x,y∈X. Let f:X→Y be an odd mapping satisfying (2.5). Then there is a unique additive mapping A:X→Y such that
∥f(2x)-8f(x)-A(x)∥≤1|2|-|2|Lmax{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x)}
for all x∈X.
Proof.
It follows from (2.34) that
∥g(x)-12g(2x)∥≤1|2|max{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x)}
for all x∈X.
The rest of the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.1.
3. Generalized Hyers-Ulam Stability of the Functional Equation (1.10): An Even Case
Now we prove the generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of the functional equation Df(x,y)=0 in non-Archimedean Banach spaces: an even case.
Theorem 3.1.
Let φ:X2→[0,∞) be a function such that there exists an L<1 with
φ(x,y)≤L|16|φ(2x,2y)
for all x,y∈X. Let f:X→Y be an even mapping satisfying (2.5) and f(0)=0. Then there is a unique quartic mapping Q:X→Y such that
∥f(2x)-4f(x)-Q(x)∥≤L|16|-|16|Lmax{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x)}
for all x∈X.
Proof.
Letting x=y in (2.5), we get
∥f(3y)-6f(2y)+15f(y)∥≤φ(y,y)
for all y∈X.
Replacing x by 2y in (2.5), we get∥f(4y)-4f(3y)+4f(2y)+4f(y)∥≤φ(2y,y)
for all y∈X.
By (3.3) and (3.4),∥f(4y)-20f(2y)+64f(y)∥≤max{∥4(f(3y)-6f(2y)+15f(y))∥,∥f(4y)-4f(3y)+4f(2y)+4f(y)∥}≤max{|4|·∥f(3y)-6f(2y)+15f(y)∥,∥f(4y)-4f(3y)+4f(2y)+4f(y)∥}≤max{|4|φ(y,y),φ(2y,y)}
for all y∈X.
Letting y:=x/2 and g(x):=f(2x)-4f(x) for all x∈X, we get∥g(x)-16g(x2)∥≤max{|4|φ(x2,x2),φ(x,x2)}
for all x∈X.
The rest of the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.1.
Corollary 3.2.
Let θ and p be positive real numbers with p<4. Let f:X→Y be an even mapping satisfying (2.26) and f(0)=0. Then there exists a unique quartic mapping Q:X→Y such that
∥f(2x)-4f(x)-Q(x)∥≤max{2·|4|,|2|p+1}θ|2|p-|16|∥x∥p
for all x∈X.
Proof.
The proof follows from Theorem 3.1 by taking
φ(x,y):=θ(∥x∥p+∥y∥p)
for all x,y∈X. Then we can choose L=|16|/|2|p and we get the desired result.
Theorem 3.3.
Let φ:X2→[0,∞) be a function such that there exists an L<1 with
φ(x,y)≤|16|Lφ(x2,y2)
for all x,y∈X. Let f:X→Y be an even mapping satisfying (2.5) and f(0)=0. Then there is a unique quartic mapping Q:X→Y such that
∥f(2x)-4f(x)-Q(x)∥≤1|16|-|16|Lmax{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x)}
for all x∈X.
Proof.
It follows from (3.6) that
∥g(x)-116g(2x)∥≤1|16|max{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x)}
for all x∈X.
The rest of the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.1.
Theorem 3.4.
Let φ:X2→[0,∞) be a function such that there exists an L<1 with
φ(x,y)≤L|4|φ(2x,2y)
for all x,y∈X. Let f:X→Y be an even mapping satisfying (2.5) and f(0)=0. Then there is a unique quadratic mapping T:X→Y such that
∥f(2x)-16f(x)-T(x)∥≤L|4|-|4|Lmax{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x)}
for all x∈X.
Proof.
Letting y:=x/2 and g(x):=f(2x)-16f(x) for all x∈X in (3.5), we get
∥g(x)-4g(x2)∥≤max{|4|φ(x2,x2),φ(x,x2)}
for all x∈X.
The rest of the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.1.
Corollary 3.5.
Let θ and p be positive real numbers with p<2. Let f:X→Y be an even mapping satisfying (2.26) and f(0)=0. Then there exists a unique quadratic mapping T:X→Y such that
∥f(2x)-16f(x)-T(x)∥≤max{2·|4|,|2|p+1}θ|2|p-|4|∥x∥p
for all x∈X.
Proof.
The proof follows from Theorem 3.4 by taking
φ(x,y):=θ(∥x∥p+∥y∥p)
for all x,y∈X. Then we can choose L=|4|/|2|p and we get the desired result.
Theorem 3.6.
Let φ:X2→[0,∞) be a function such that there exists an L<1 with
φ(x,y)≤|4|Lφ(x2,y2)
for all x,y∈X. Let f:X→Y be an even mapping satisfying (2.5) and f(0)=0. Then there is a unique quadratic mapping T:X→Y such that
∥f(2x)-16f(x)-T(x)∥≤1|4|-|4|Lmax{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x)}
for all x∈X.
Proof.
It follows from (3.14) that
∥g(x)-14g(2x)∥≤1|4|max{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x)}
for all x∈X.
The rest of the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.1.
For a given f, let fo(x):=((f(x)-f(-x))/2) and fe(x):=((f(x)+f(-x))/2). Then fo is odd and fe is even. Let go(x):=fo(2x)-2fo(x) and ho(x):=fo(2x)-8fo(x). Then fo(x)=(1/6)go(x)-(1/6)ho(x). Let ge(x):=fe(2x)-4fe(x) and he(x):=fe(2x)-16fe(x). Then fe(x)=(1/12)ge(x)-(1/12)he(x). Thus f(x)=16go(x)-16ho(x)+112ge(x)-112he(x).
Theorem 3.7.
Let φ:X2→[0,∞) be a function such that there exists an L<1 with
φ(x,y)≤L|2|φ(2x,2y)
for all x,y∈X. Let f:X→Y be a mapping satisfying f(0)=0 and (2.5). Then there exist an additive mapping A:X→Y, a quadratic mapping T:X→Y, a cubic mapping C:X→Y, and a quartic mapping Q:X→Y such that
∥f(x)-16A(x)-112T(x)-16C(x)-112Q(x)∥≤max{L|6|·|2|(1-L),L|12|·|4|(1-L),L|6|·|8|(1-L),L|12|·|16|(1-L)}·1|2|max{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x),|4|φ(-x,-x),φ(-2x,-x)}≤L|12|·|16|·|2|(1-L)·max{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x),|4|φ(-x,-x),φ(-2x,-x)}
for all x∈X.
Corollary 3.8.
Let θ and p be positive real numbers with p<1. Let f:X→Y be a mapping satisfying f(0)=0 and (2.5). Then there exist an additive mapping A:X→Y, a quadratic mapping T:X→Y, a cubic mapping C:X→Y and a quartic mapping Q:X→Y, such that
∥f(x)-16A(x)-112T(x)-16C(x)-112Q(x)∥≤max{2·|4|,|2|p+1}·θ|12|(|2|p-|2|)∥x∥p
for all x∈X.
Proof.
The proof follows from Theorem 3.7 by taking
φ(x,y):=θ(∥x∥p+∥y∥p)
for all x,y∈X. Then we can choose L=|2|/|2|p and we get the desired result.
Theorem 3.9.
Let φ:X2→[0,∞) be a function such that there exists an L<1 with
φ(x,y)≤|16|Lφ(x2,y2)
for all x,y∈X. Let f:X→Y be a mapping satisfying f(0)=0 and (2.5). Then there exist an additive mapping A:X→Y, a quadratic mapping T:X→Y, a cubic mapping C:X→Y and a quartic mapping Q:X→Y such that
∥f(x)-16A(x)-112T(x)-16C(x)-112Q(x)∥≤max{1|6|·|2|(1-L),1|12|·|4|(1-L),1|6|·|8|(1-L),1|12|·|16|(1-L)}·1|2|max{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x),|4|φ(-x,-x),φ(-2x,-x)}≤1|12|·|16|·|2|(1-L)·max{|4|φ(x,x),φ(2x,x),|4|φ(-x,-x),φ(-2x,-x)}
for all x∈X.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2009-0070788).
MoslehianM. S.SadeghiG.A Mazur-Ulam theorem in non-Archimedean normed spaces200869103405340810.1016/j.na.2007.09.023MR2450548ZBL1160.46049UlamS. M.1960New York, NY, USAIntersciencexiii+150Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, no. 8MR0120127HyersD. H.On the stability of the linear functional equation194127222224MR000407610.1073/pnas.27.4.222ZBL0061.26403AokiT.On the stability of the linear transformation in Banach spaces195026466MR004058010.2969/jmsj/00210064ZBL0040.35501RassiasTh. M.On the stability of the linear mapping in Banach spaces197872229730010.2307/2042795MR507327ZBL0398.47040GăvruţaP.A generalization of the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of approximately additive mappings1994184343143610.1006/jmaa.1994.1211MR1281518ZBL0818.46043SkofF.Proprietà locali e approssimazione di operatori19835311312910.1007/BF02924890CholewaP. W.Remarks on the stability of functional equations1984271-2768610.1007/BF02192660MR758860ZBL0549.39006CzerwikS.On the stability of the quadratic mapping in normed spaces1992625964MR118284110.1007/BF02941618ZBL0779.39003JunK.-W.KimH.-M.The generalized Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of a cubic functional equation2002274226727810.1016/S0022-247X(02)00415-8MR1936735ZBL1021.39014LeeS. H.ImS. M.HwangI. S.Quartic functional equations2005307238739410.1016/j.jmaa.2004.12.062MR2142432ZBL1072.39024CzerwikS.2002River Edge, NJ, USAWorld Scientificx+410MR1904790GajdaZ.On stability of additive mappings199114343143410.1155/S016117129100056XMR1110036ZBL0739.39013HyersD. H.IsacG.RassiasTh. M.199834Boston, Mass, USABirkhäuservi+313Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their ApplicationsMR1639801JungS.-M.2001Palm Harbor, Fla, USAHadronic Pressix+256MR1841182ParkC.Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of homomorphisms in quasi-Banach algebras20081322879610.1016/j.bulsci.2006.07.004MR2387819ZBL1144.39025ParkC.Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of a generalized Apollonius-Jensen type additive mapping and isomorphisms between C∗-algebras20082813402411MR239212210.1002/mana.200510611ParkC.CuiJ.Generalized stability of C∗-ternary quadratic mappings20072007623282MR2302189ParkC.NajatiA.Homomorphisms and derivations in C∗-algebras200720071280630MR2302193RassiasTh. M.Problem 16; 2, Report of the 27th International Symposium on Functional Equations199039292293; 309RassiasTh. M.On the stability of the quadratic functional equation and its applications199843389124MR1854544ZBL1009.39025RassiasTh. M.The problem of S. M. Ulam for approximately multiplicative mappings2000246235237810.1006/jmaa.2000.6788MR1761936ZBL0958.46022RassiasTh. M.On the stability of functional equations in Banach spaces20002511264284MR179040910.1006/jmaa.2000.7046ZBL0964.39026RassiasTh. M.On the stability of functional equations and a problem of Ulam200062123130MR177801610.1023/A:1006499223572ZBL0981.39014RassiasTh. M.ŠemrlP.On the behavior of mappings which do not satisfy Hyers-Ulam stability19921144989993MR105963410.2307/2159617ZBL0761.47004RassiasTh. M.ŠemrlP.On the Hyers-Ulam stability of linear mappings19931732325338MR120932210.1006/jmaa.1993.1070ZBL0789.46037RassiasTh. M.ShibataK.Variational problem of some quadratic functionals in complex analysis19982281234253MR165991710.1006/jmaa.1998.6129ZBL0945.30023CădariuL.RaduV.Fixed points and the stability of Jensen's functional equation200341, article 4ZBL1043.39010DiazJ. B.MargolisB.A fixed point theorem of the alternative, for contractions on a generalized complete metric space196874305309MR022026710.1090/S0002-9904-1968-11933-0ZBL0157.29904IsacG.RassiasTh. M.Stability of ψ-additive mappings: applications to nonlinear analysis1996192219228MR137598310.1155/S0161171296000324CădariuL.RaduV.On the stability of the Cauchy functional equation: a fixed point approach2004346Graz, AustriaKarl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz4352Grazer Mathematische BerichteMR2089527ZBL1060.39028CădariuL.RaduV.Fixed point methods for the generalized stability of functional equations in a single variable200820081510.1155/2008/749392749392MR2395316ZBL1146.39040MirzavaziriM.MoslehianM. S.A fixed point approach to stability of a quadratic equation2006373361376MR226778310.1007/s00574-006-0016-zZBL1118.39015ParkC.Fixed points and Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of Cauchy-Jensen functional equations in Banach algebras200720071510.1155/2007/5017550175MR2335969ZBL1167.39018ParkC.Generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of quadratic functional equations: a fixed point approach20082008910.1155/2010/185780493751MR2395314ZBL1146.39048RaduV.The fixed point alternative and the stability of functional equations2003419196MR2031824ZBL1051.39031Eshaghi-GordjiM.Kaboli-GharetapehS.ParkC.ZolfaghariS.Stability of an additive-cubic-quartic functional equation2009200920395693MR2588197Eshaghi GordjiM.AbbaszadehS.ParkC.On the stability of a generalized quadratic and quartic type functional equation in quasi-Banach spaces200920092610.1155/2009/153084153084MR2557805MiheţD.RaduV.On the stability of the additive Cauchy functional equation in random normed spaces20083431567572MR2412151ZBL1139.39040