Abstract and Applied Analysis

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 282185, 10 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/282185

Research Article

The Analysis of Corporate Bond Valuation under an Infinite Dimensional Compound Poisson Framework

Sheng Fan

School of Economic Mathematics, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China

Received 18 March 2014; Accepted 10 May 2014; Published 28 May 2014

Academic Editor: Igor Leite Freire

Copyright © 2014 Sheng Fan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

This paper analyzes the firm bond valuation and credit spread with an endogenous model for the pure default and callable default corporate bond. Regarding the stochastic instantaneous forward rates and the firm value as an infinite dimensional Poisson process, we provide some analytical results for the embedded American options and firm bond valuations.

1. Introduction

Corporate bonds trade at higher yield than the comparable government bonds due to default risk and embedded American options such as call, put, and convertibility. However, even accounts for the effect of embedded options, it has been difficult to reconcile the observed spread with credit risk and reasonable parameters and is thus frequently referred to as the “credit spread puzzle” [1]. Wide range models typically explain only 20%–30% of the observed credit spreads. The credit quality of bond, downward jump risk of the issuers’ value, and the bond maturity have some explaining power to the observed spreads. For junk bonds, the credit risk accounts for much larger fraction of observed spreads than investment grade bonds do [2]. For long-maturity bonds, Collin-Dufresne et al. [3] have argued that firms with good credit quality are likely to issue more debt, which leads to higher yield spreads. The authors in [4–7] have shown that models with incorporating jump risk explain a significant part of observed credit spreads. Liquidity risk is an important element of spreads, if the debt market is of lower liquidity. It is shown in [8] by Longstaff et al. that liquidity risk may not construct the majority of corporate spreads as in the frictionless credit-default swaps market.

Since the structural approach is one of the most widely employed frameworks of credit risk valuation, by incorporating jump risk into the structural framework, this paper analyzes the valuation of callable corporate bond and embedded options. Allowing the economic variables driven by its own risk resource as in [9–12], we emphasize that the state nature of different maturities is an important determinant factor to the assets pricing. For the instantaneous forward interest rates, the risk resource depends not only on time but also on the time-to-maturity. Therefore, we expand the dynamics of the instantaneous forward rates as an infinite dimensional jump-diffusion process. This expansion has three features: the model could flexibly capture the covariation and the term structure of correlation between different firm bonds and government bonds in a parsimonious way than their multifactor counterparts. Any observed data set of bond prices is fully compatible with the expanding random process. It is unnecessary to add an error term in the econometric model to calculate the parameters.

For the corporate bond valuation, based on different assumptions about the bankruptcy rules, exogenous and endogenous models have different implication and lead to different risk management behaviours. In the exogenous model, bankruptcy liquidation is made by the outside investors when the firm value reaches the trigger value such as bond par value [13–16]. For some exogenous bankruptcy models, there is arbitrage opportunity due to the negative spreads. In the endogenous model, the bankruptcy decision depends on the issuers who endogenously optimally exercise the embedded options [17–20]. We conduct our analysis within the endogenous bankruptcy framework.

To examine the corporate bond valuation and the interaction with embedded options, we introduce a benchmark bond which is a risk-free comparable government bond as in [21]. Treating the corporate bond as the benchmark bond minus the embedded options, we could easily clarify the interaction between call provisions and default risk.

In this paper, we first analyze the impact of benchmark bond price and firm value to the embedded option as well as the corporate bond valuation. It shows that credit spread is positively related with the benchmark bond price and negatively related with firm value. For the callable corporate bond, the embedded options value is higher than that of the pure default bond. The increment can be decomposed as the “American premium” part and the “call option” part. Secondly, we consider the embedded American options exercise boundaries and show that, for the callable corporate bond, the relationship between the firm values and the boundaries is more complicated than that of pure default bond. When the firm value is lower than the call price, the exercise boundaries are higher for higher firm value. When the firm value is higher than the call price, the strike boundary decreases with the firm value. Similar results are obtained in [21]. But our results are more accurate. Finally, we emphasize the effect of the exogenous shock and firm procyclicality to the credit spread. If the exogenous shock is negative to the benchmark bond and positive to the firm value, the credit spread depends on the total effect.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents the basic valuation framework for the corporate bond. Section 3 derives the valuation model for the pure default corporate bond and analyzes the effecting factors. Section 4 examines the impact of benchmark bond price, firm value, and their covariation to the credit spread for the default and callable corporate bond. The conclusion follows in Section 5.

2. The Preliminary of Valuation Model

Let be a probability space with a stochastic process and let be independent Poisson processes, where is a filtration. Assume that the instantaneous forward rates follow the dynamics

where the stochastic process is a generalization of the one-dimensional Brownian motion, which depends on both time and maturity . Given time-to-maturity , the stochastic perturbation is a standard Brownian motion. describes at time the different magnitude’s stochastic perturbation to the forward rates with different time-to-maturity. The instantaneous forward rates constitute a continuum. Such generalization is natural and acceptable. The generalized Brownian motion exists and can be obtained by solving SPDEs as in [12]. This model is different from that of [21] in three aspects. We model the instantaneous forward rates rather than the interest rates. The continuous stochastic risk source is infinite dimension. We incorporate the compound jump process in the model. satisfies the following requirements.

(1) is continuous on and .(2) is a martingale in time ; that is, , for all .(3)The variance of the increments with respect to time is equal to the time change; namely, , for all .(4)The correlation of the increments, , does not depend on time .

At the same time, the correlation coefficient satisfies the following requirements.

(1)Symmetric, .(2) takes values between and .(3).(4)The correlation coefficient matrix is positive semidefinite.

The notation means that the increment is taken with respect to the first element time . is a compound Poisson process; . Poisson process counts the number of jumps that occur at or before time with the intensity . () are independent identically distributed discrete random variables with finite values ; the probability . Here, we allow that the impacts of exogenous shock to the economic basis are time-variable and assume that the jump size is finite. , , and are nonrandom functions and satisfy Lipschitz linear growth conditions. That is, for some constant , , , and satisfy

for all . In the filtration , the compound jump is independent of the stochastic string process .

The decomposition theorem of a compound Poisson process (see [22]) shows that could be rewritten as . So the dynamics of instantaneous forward rates can be written in the integral form

The price at time of a zero coupon bond with maturity is expressed as

Now, we consider a firm with one single bond to be outstanding. The bond has a series coupons paid at each time , , and maturity at time . In order to analyze the effect of the embedded default and call options on the corporate bond, we introduce a benchmark bond which is noncallable nondefault with the same coupon and maturity as the corporate bond. Corporate bond can be viewed as the benchmark bond minus a default and/or call option. The benchmark bond with maturity can be expressed as

Assume that the market is complete. By the second fundamental theorem of asset pricing (see [22]), there exists an unique risk-neutral measure . Under the risk-neutral measure , for each fixed maturity , define , where is the market price of risk. is the counterpart of under the actual probability measure . For each maturity , is still a Brownian motion. is a compound Poisson process with intensity , where is the number of jumps till time under the risk-neutral measure . The jump sizes are still I.I.D. random variables, while the jump intensity satisfies , () for arbitrary , where and each () is a positive constant. Notice that, under the measure , is still independent of (). Under the risk-neutral measure , the price at time of a zero coupon bond with maturity can be expressed as (see [23])

where is a nonrandom function and satisfies , for all . is a left-continuous nonrandom function and satisfies , for all . The discounted zero bond is a martingale. Notice that . We rewrite the value of zero coupon bond as

where

Assume that the value of the firm is independent of its capital structure and is a jump diffusion given by

where () is the survival period of the firm, , , , and satisfy Lipschitz conditions, is a left-continuous nonrandom function and satisfies, for all jump size , a.s., and is the firm’s payout rate.

Under the risk-neutral measure , we have

By the market price of risk equation

the dynamics of the firm value is rewritten as

where is a compensated Poisson process.

Theorem 1. Under the risk-neutral measure , the firm value is

Proof. We prove that (13) is the solution of (12). Let . Denote

By Itô formula for jump process, we have

Rearranging it, we obtain

It completes the proof.

For , the value of corporate bond can be rewritten as

where

3. Valuing Defaultable Bond

In the endogenous bankruptcy model, the bankruptcy decision is optimally done by the bond issuers’ themselves. For the pure default noncallable bond, when the embedded default option arrives at its maximum, the issuer would give up the firm to exempt its debt. The value of the pure defaultable bond with embedded default option is

where is the embedded default option value at time . Consider

where , is the filtration; satisfies

The yield spread of a given bond over its benchmark bond is a straightforward transformation of the bond’s embedded option value. Define

as the optimal stopping time based on the state at time , which is the first time the default option value reaches the level .

Theorem 2. For different initial firm values and benchmark bond prices, the following properties hold.

Here is the risk-neutral default probability under the condition that the firm value at time is and is the risk-neutral default probability under the state in which the benchmark bond price at time is .

Remark 3. These results are consistent with those of [21], but our results are more accurate by providing closer embedded options spread.

Proof. Due to , , by the no-crossing properties for jump-diffusion process, we have

Given that the state at time is and , assume that its optimal stopping time is and its associated embedded default options value is . Thus . Similarly, is the embedded options value when at time . Thus

For , assume that its optimal stopping time is . We have

where denotes the indicator function of the set . In the second last equation, we use the fact that (by the same token, (30), (40), and (47) also hold).

Note that . For firm value , we have

By the no-crossing properties for the jump-diffusion process, for , we have

Given that the state at time is with the optimal stopping time , we have

For the state of the value with the optimal stopping time , we have

Note that . For , we have

This completes the proof.

4. Valuing Callable Defaultable Bond

For the callable defaultable bond, when the firm value falls far below its obligation such that the default option arrives at its maximum, the issuers would exempt its obligation by giving up the firm. When the benchmark bond exceeds the preset provisional call price schedule , which is the strike price to call the debt, the issuers intend to exercise the call option to buy back the bond or reissue a bond with lower interest rates. The value of the callable corporate bond is

where is the embedded option value at time ,

The embedded option satisfies

The optimal stopping time is

Similarly, we have the following theorem.

Theorem 4. For the different initial value of firm value and benchmark bond, the following properties hold.

Proof. It is similar with the case of the pure default corporate bond. By the no-crossing properties for jump-diffusion process, we have

So, replacing the strike price by and by in the proof of Theorem 2, we obtain the results of Theorem 4.

Theorem 5. satisfies

where

where is the optimal stopping time for the pure default corporate bond and is the optimal stopping time for the callable default corporate bond.

Remark 6. Due to the embedded call option, is worth more than . The increment of over can be decomposed into two parts.

(1)The part of the “American premium” (). That is, the firm has the right to exercise the embedded option at the optimal stopping time.(2)The part of the “call option” . Due to the call provision, the firm has the option either to buy back the debt when the firm works well () or to keep the firm when the firm value is less than the benchmark bond but before bankruptcy ().

From the second part of Theorem 4, the increment of over is less than that of embedded pure call option due to the interaction between the default option and call option.

Proof. Notice that . Let be the optimal stopping time of , and let be the optimal stopping time of ,

On the other hand, we have

This completes the proof.

For the embedded options exercise boundaries, denote as the exercise boundary of the pure defaultable corporate bond, when at time , which means that as soon as the benchmark bond price reaches , the firm should exercise options; that is, the firm should default. Denote as the exercise boundary of the callable defaultable corporate bond, when at time , which means that, in the case , the firm would default as soon as the benchmark bond price reaches ; in the case , the firm would call back its debt as soon as the benchmark bond price reaches . In terms of the benchmark bond price, we have the following theorem.

Theorem 7. For each , it holds that

Proof. When the benchmark bond price , the firm with would not exercise the embedded default option. By part 1 of Theorem 2, we have

So the firm with would also not exercise the embedded default option, which means that the default boundary is no lower than that of the firm value . Thus, .

When , the firm would consider to exercise the default option. If , for , we have

So .

When , the firm would consider to exercise the call option. If , which means , for , we have

So , which means .

When , for , we have

So , which means . This completes the proof.

For the value of the embedded option, it can be reexpressed as

For , we have

where

Notice that the price of benchmark bond satisfies

For , we have

where

For , we have

where

From (47)–(54), we have the following theorem.

Theorem 8. For the exogenous shock,

For the impact of covariation between and , we have

Remark 9. The present default distance is negatively related with the default probability . Therefore, it negatively relates with the credit spread.

The covariation between the economic basis and firm value will affect the default probability and the credit spread. If the economy is boom and the covariation is negative, then the credit spread will narrow along with the increasing firm value. If the economy is recession and the covariation is positive, then the credit spread would widen along with the decreasing firm value.

The shocks cause jump in benchmark bond price and the firm value. When the exogenous shock increases the firm value, the default probability would decrease. Therefore, the embedded options and the credit spread tend to decrease. However, the call provision would offset this effect to some degree. The effect of exogenous shock depends on the total impact of and . As Theorem 8 shows, if , then the credit spread would narrow. If , then the credit spread would widen.

Due to the free boundary problems of American options and the firm’s payout rate, we have not obtained the accurate pricing for the firm bond and the embedded American options.

5. Conclusion

We study the valuation of the firm bonds and their embedded options through an infinite dimensional jump-diffusion process. Some analytical results on corporate bond valuation, embedded options, and their exercise boundaries are obtained. By decomposing the corporate bond as benchmark bond minus or plus embedded options, analyzing the credit spread’s effect factors, and dismantling the comprehensive effects of the exogenous shock on the embedded options, we find that the credit spread is affected by the firm value. Lower initial firm value implies higher credit spread. But the difference between the spreads is less than the difference of firm value times the risk-neutral default probability. A formal empirical test of the model’s implications especially on the “credit spread puzzle” would be an interesting subject for future researches.

Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to referees whose meaningful suggestions are very helpful to revise the paper. This work is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JBK130401 and JBK131106).

References

J. Amato and E. Remolona, “The credit spread puzzle,” BIS Quarterly Review, pp. 51–63, 2003.

E. J. Elton, M. J. Gruber, D. Agrawal, and C. Mann, “Explaining the rate spread on corporate bonds,” Journal of Finance, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 247–277, 2001.

P. Collin-Dufresne, R. S. Goldstein, and J. S. Martin, “The determinants of credit spread changes,” Journal of Finance, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 2177–2207, 2001.

K. J. M. Cremers, J. Driessen, and P. Maenhout, “Explaining the level of credit spreads: option-implied jump risk premia in a firm value model,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 2209–2242, 2008.

D. Duffie, J. Pan, and K. Singleton, “Transform analysis and asset pricing for affine jump-diffusions,” Econometrica, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1343–1376, 2000.

S. G. Kou and H. Wang, “Option pricing under a double exponential jump diffusion model,” Management Science, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 1178–1192, 2004.

C. L. Yu, H. Li, and M. T. Wells, “Mcmc estimation of lévy jump models using stock and option prices,” Mathematical Finance, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 383–422, 2011.

F. A. Longstaff, S. Mithal, and E. Neis, “Corporate yield spreads: default risk or liquidity? New evidence from the credit default swap market,” Journal of Finance, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 2213–2253, 2005.

D. P. Kennedy, “The term structure of interest rates as a Gaussian random field,” Mathematical Finance, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 247–258, 1994.

D. P. Kennedy, “Characterizing Gaussian models of the term structure of interest rates,” Mathemnatical Finance, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 107–118, 1997.

R. S. Goldstein, “The term structure of interest rates as a random field,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 365–384, 2000.

P. Santa-Clara and D. Sornette, “The dynamics of the forward interest rate curve with stochastic string shocks,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 149–185, 2001.

R. C. Merton, “On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates,” Journal of Finance, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 449–470, 1974.

F. Black and J. C. Cox, “Valuing corporate securities: some effects of bond indenture provisions,” Journal of Finance, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 351–367, 1976.

M. J. Brennan and E. S. Schwartz, “Analyzing convertible bonds,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 907–929, 1980.

F. A. Longsta and E. S. Schwartz, “A simple approach to valuing risky fixed and oating rate debt,” Journal of Finance, vol. 50, pp. 789–819, 1995.

R. Geske, “The valuation of corporate liabilities as compound options,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Economics, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 541–552, 1977.

M. J. Brennan and E. S. Schwartz, “Convertible bonds: valuation and optimal strategies for call and conversion,” Journal of Finance, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1699–1715, 1977.

E. O. Fischer, R. Heinkel, and J. Zechner, “Dynamic capital structure choice: theory and tests,” Journal of Finance, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 19–40, 1989.

H. Leland and K. Toft, “Optimal capital structure, endogenous bankruptcy, and the term structure of credit spreads,” Journal of Finance, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 987–1019, 1996.

V. V. Acharya and J. N. Carpenter, “Corporate Bond Valuation and Hedging with Stochastic Interest Rates and Endogenous Bankruptcy,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1355–1383, 2002.

S. E. Shreve, Stochastic Calculus for Finance II: Continuous-Time Models, Springer Finance, 2004.

S. Fan, “A stochastic string with a compound Poisson process,” Abstract and Applicated Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 857678, 8 pages, 2013.