Abstract and Applied Analysis

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 710949, 10 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/710949

Research Article

Positive Solutions for a Nonhomogeneous Kirchhoff Equation with the Asymptotical Nonlinearity in

Ling Ding,¹ Lin Li,² and Jin-Ling Zhang¹

¹School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Hubei 441053, China

²School of Mathematics and Statistics, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

Received 19 July 2013; Revised 20 December 2013; Accepted 22 December 2013; Published 25 February 2014

Academic Editor: Elena Litsyn

Copyright © 2014 Ling Ding et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

We study the following nonhomogeneous Kirchhoff equation: , where is asymptotically linear with respect to at infinity. Under appropriate assumptions on , and , existence of two positive solutions is proved by using the Ekeland's variational principle and the Mountain Pass Theorem in critical point theory.

1. Introduction and Main Results

In this paper, we consider the following nonhomogeneous Kirchhoff equation:

where constants , and functions , and satisfy the following conditions: is a positive bounded condition, , if and , . Note that, with ,  , and replaced by , problem (1) reduces to

which can be looked at as a generalization of the well known Schrödinger equation.

When is a smooth bounded domain in , the problem

is related to the stationary analogue of the Kirchhoff equation which was proposed by Kirchhoff in 1883 (see [1]) as a generalization of the well known d’Alembert’s wave equation

for free vibrations of elastic strings. Kirchhoff’s model takes into account the changes in length of the string produced by transverse vibrations. Here, is the length of the string, is the area of the cross section, is the Young modulus of the material, is the mass density, and is the initial tension. Moreover, Kirchhoff’s type problems also model several physical systems and biological systems and there are many interesting results for problem (3) which can be found in [2–8] and the references therein.

Some interesting studies for Kirchhoff-type problem (3) in a bounded domain of by variational methods can be found in [2, 9–22]. Very recently, some authors had studied the Kirchhoff equation on the whole space and obtained the existence of multiple solutions (see [23–31]). In the same spirit of [24–26, 28–31], we study a nonhomogeneous Kirchhoff equation (1) on the whole space . Especially, inspired by the paper [32, 33], we consider the asymptotically linear nonlinearity at infinity of problem (1). For the nonhomogeneous Kirchhoff problem, Chen and Li in [23] study it under the condition of superlinear nonlinearity at infinity. In [33], Wang and Zhou study the existence of two positive solutions for a nonhomogeneous elliptic equation ((1) with and ). In [32], Sun et al. study the existence of a ground state solution for some nonautonomous Schrödinger-Poisson systems involving the asymptotically linear nonlinearity at infinity without the nonhomogeneous term. But we will study the existence of two positive solutions for Kirchhoff-type problem (1) with , the asymptotically linear nonlinearity at infinity and the nonhomogeneous term. So, we can not obtain the existence of a ground state solution for Kirchhoff-type problem (1) and the compactness result as in [32] because of the nonhomogeneous term, and we cannot easily obtain the compactness result as in [33] due to the nonlocal term (or ). To our best knowledge, little has been done for nonhomogeneous Kirchhoff problems with respect to the asymptotically linear nonlinearity at infinity.

Before stating our main results, we give some notations. For any , we denote by the usual norm of the Lebesgue space . Define the function space

with the product and equivalent norm

Define the function space

with the standard product and norm

Recall that the Sobolev’s inequality with the best constant is

Moreover, problem (1) has a variational structure. Indeed the corresponding action functional of (1) is defined by

By Lemma 2.1 in [24] or Lemma 1 in [25], the functional is with the derivative given by

Hence, if is a nonzero critical point of , then it is also a nonnegative solution of (1). In fact, by if and , we have    , where . This yields that ; then , where . By the maximum principle, the nonzero critical point of is the positive solution for problem (1).

Here is the main result of this paper.

Theorem 1. Suppose that , , and the following conditions hold.

(f1), , and for .(f2). (f3). (k1) is a positive continuous function and there exists such that

(k2)Let

hold, where , .

Then problem (1) has at least two positive solutions satisfying and if for some small .

Remark 2. It is not difficult to find some functions satisfying conditions of Theorem 1. For example, for any , let

Clearly, satisfies (f1)–(f3) with . Moreover, and . Taking a positive continuous function ,

where for some . Note that

then (k1) holds. To verify the condition (k2), we have to choose some special . For any , taking such that if ,   if and for all , where is an arbitrary constant independent of . Then, for any , we have

Taking , , where is large enough such that , , and . Let . Then, we obtain that . Moreover, in view of the definition of and (18), one has

So, condition (k2) holds. In particular, the condition (k1) and above examples can also be found in [34] in which the asymptotically linear term satisfying (k1) appeared first.

Remark 3. If , we know that problem (1) has a positive ground state solution by using the method in [32] and a trivial solution (). If , a trivial solution () is replaced by the local minimum solution by Theorem 1. Note that the local minimal solution exists due to the homogeneous term which is looked at as a small perturbation because for small .

In order to obtain our results, we have to overcome various difficulties. Since the embedding of into , , is not compact, condition (k1) and (k2) are crucial to obtain the boundedness of Cerami sequence. Furthermore, in order to recover the compactness, we establish a compactness result which is similar to [32] but different from the one in [24–26, 28–31]. In fact, this difficulty can be avoided, when problems are considered, restricting to the subspace of consisting of radially symmetric functions [23, 24, 29] and constraint potential functions [25, 30], or when one is looking for semiclassical states [28], by using perturbation methods or a reduction to a finite dimension by the projections method. Third, it is not difficult to find that every (PS) sequence is bounded because a variant of Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition is satisfied (see [23, 25, 31]). However, for the asymptotically linear case, we have to find another method to verify the boundedness of (PS) sequence.

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we manage to give proofs of Theorem 1. In the following discussion, we denote various positive constants as or    for convenience.

2. Proof of Main Result

In this section, we prove that problem (1) has a mountain pass type solution and a local minimum solution with . For this purpose, we use a variant version of Mountain Pass Theorem [35], which allows us to find a so-called Cerami type PS sequence (Cerami sequence, in short). The properties of this kind of Cerami sequence sequences are very helpful in showing its boundedness in the asymptotical cases. The following lemmas will show that has the so-called mountain pass geometry.

Lemma 4. Suppose that , , (f1)–(f3), and (k1) hold. Then there exist such that for .

Proof. For any , it follows from (f1)–(f3) that there exists such that

Therefore, we have

Furthermore, by (f1)–(f3) and (k1), there exists such that

According to (21), (22), and the Sobolev inequality, we deduce that

where . By , , and the Hlder inequality, one has

Taking and setting for , we see there exists such that . Then it follows from (24) that there exists such that for . Of course, can be chosen small enough; we can obtain the same result: there exists such that for .

Lemma 5. Suppose that , , (f1)–(f3), and (k1)-(k2) hold. Then there exists with , is given by Lemma 4, such that .

Proof. By (k2) and , in view of the definition of and with , there is a nonnegative function such that

and . Then, we have

Choosing small enough in Lemma 4 such that , then this Lemma is proved.

From Lemmas 4 and 5 and Mountain Pass Lemma in [35], there is a Cerami sequence such that

where denotes the dual space of . In the following Lemmas 6 and 7, we shall prove that satisfies the Cerami condition, that is; the Cerami sequence has a convergence subsequence.

Lemma 6. Suppose that , , (f1)–(f3), and (k1) hold. Then defined in (27) is bounded in .

Proof. By contradiction, let . Define . Clearly, is bounded in and there is a such that, up to a sequence,

as .

Firstly, we claim that is nontrivial; that is, . Otherwise, if , the Sobolev embedding implies that strongly in ; is given by (k1). By (f1)–(f3), there exists such that

Then, for all , we have

This yields

Furthermore, by (k1), there exists a constant such that

Then, for all , we have

Combining (31) and (33), we obtain

By (27), we get

as . Together with as , it follows that

Together with , we have

where, and in what follows, denotes a quantity which goes to zero as . Therefore, we deduce that

which contradicts (34). So, .

Furthermore, because as , it follows from (35) that

that is,

Together with (22), (29), and , one has

This yields

This means

Therefore, we have

By , we get as ; thus strongly in ; therefore, weakly in . Since weakly in ; we have weakly in . By the uniqueness of the weak limitation, we have which contradicts . Therefore, the Cerami sequence is bounded in .

Lemma 7. Suppose that , , (f1)–(f3), and (k1) hold. Then for any , there exist and such that defined in (27) satisfies for and .

Proof. Let be a smooth function such that

Moreover, there exists a constant independent of such that

Then, for all and , by (45), (46), and the Hlder inequality, we have

This implies that

for all and , where . From Lemma 6, we know that is bounded in . Together with (27), we obtain that in . Moreover, by (48), for , there exists such that

for and . Note that

This yields

By (32), we have

This yields

for all and . For any , there exists such that

Because , , there exists such that

By the Hlder inequality, (45), (55), and the boundedness of in , we have

By the Young inequality, (46), and (54), for all and , we obtain

Combining , (51), (53), (56), (57), and the boundedness of in , there exists such that

Note that is independent of . So, for any , we can choose and such that holds.

Lemma 8. Suppose that , , (f1)–(f3), and (k1)-(k2) hold. Then the sequence in (27) has a convergent subsequence. Moreover, possesses a nonzero critical point in and .

Proof. By Lemma 6, the sequence in (27) is bounded in . We may assume that up to a subsequence weakly in for some . Now, we shall show that as .

By (11), we have

By (59), , and the boundedness of in , we easily get

One has

It is clear that

Since weakly in , we obtain

By the continuity of imbedding , we have that weakly in ; that is,

By (63) and (64), we deduce

Combining the boundedness of in , (64), and (65), we obtain

Moreover, by (32), Lemma 7, and in , for any and large enough, one has

This and the compactness of embedding imply that

Since is bounded in and the continuity of the Sobolev embedding of imbedding in , for any choice of and , the relation

holds for large . By , for any there exists such that

By (70) and (69), we have

This yields

By (61), (62), (66), (68), and (72), we have

by . This yields that as and is a nonzero critical point of in and by Mountain Pass Theorem in [35].

Now, we give local properties of the variational functional , which is required by using Ekeland’s variational principle.

Lemma 9. Suppose that , , (f1)–(f3), and (k1) hold. If , then there exists such that

are given by Lemma 4 and is a positive solution of system (1).

Proof. Because , , we can choose a function such that

Together with (f1), (k1), and (75), for , we have

for small enough. Thus there exists small enough such that . By Lemma 4, we deduce that

By applying Ekeland’s variational principle [36, Theorem 4.1] in , there is a minimizing sequence such that

Then, by a standard procedure, we can show that is a bounded PS sequence of . Lemmas 7 and 8 imply that there exists such that and . So this lemma is proved.

Proof of Theorem 1.2. By Lemmas 4–8, we obtain the existence of a mountain pass solution for problem (1) and . By Lemma 9, we know that problem (1) has a local minimum solution and . Thus, and are positive. Thus this theorem is proved.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their thanks to Professor Chun-Lei Tang for his valuable help and suggestion during their stay in Southwest University. The authors would like to thank the referee for valuable suggestions. The first author was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 11101347), Postdoctor Foundation of China (no. 2012M510363) and the Key Project in Science and Technology Research Plan of the Education Department of Hubei Province (nos. D20112605 and D20122501), while the second one by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 11201323) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (no. XDJK2013D007).

References

G. R. Kirchhoff, Vorlesungen Über Mathematische Physik, Teubner, Leipzig, Germany, 1883.

C. O. Alves, F. J. S. A. Corrêa, and T. F. Ma, “Positive solutions for a quasilinear elliptic equation of Kirchhoff type,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 85–93, 2005.

S. Bernstein, “Sur une classe d'equations fonctionnelles aux derivees,” Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR Series, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 1940.

S. I. Pohozaev, “A certain class of quasilinear hyperbolic equations,” Matematicheskii Sbornik, vol. 96, no. 138, pp. 152–166, 168, 1975 (Russian).

J. L. Lions, “On some questions in boundary value problems of mathematical physics. Contemporary developments in continuum mechanics and partial differential equations,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium, Instituto de Matemática, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, 1977, North-Holland Mathematics Studies, pp. 284–346, North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1978.

A. Arosio and S. Panizzi, “On the well-posedness of the Kirchhoff string,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 348, no. 1, pp. 305–330, 1996.

M. M. Cavalcanti, V. N. D. Cavalcanti, and J. A. Soriano, “Global existence and uniform decay rates for the Kirchhoff-Carrier equation with nonlinear dissipation,” Advances in Differential Equations, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 701–730, 2001.

P. D'Ancona and S. Spagnolo, “Global solvability for the degenerate Kirchhoff equation with real analytic data,” Inventiones Mathematicae, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 247–262, 1992.

B. Cheng and X. Wu, “Existence results of positive solutions of Kirchhoff type problems,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 4883–4892, 2009.

X. He and W. Zou, “Infinitely many positive solutions for Kirchhoff-type problems,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1407–1414, 2009.

T. F. Ma and J. E. Muñoz Rivera, “Positive solutions for a nonlinear nonlocal elliptic transmission problem,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 243–248, 2003.

A. Mao and Z. Zhang, “Sign-changing and multiple solutions of Kirchhoff type problems without the P.S. condition,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1275–1287, 2009.

K. Perera and Z. Zhang, “Nontrivial solutions of Kirchhoff-type problems via the Yang index,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 221, no. 1, pp. 246–255, 2006.

Z. Zhang and K. Perera, “Sign changing solutions of Kirchhoff type problems via invariant sets of descent flow,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 317, no. 2, pp. 456–463, 2006.

X. He and W. Zou, “Multiplicity of solutions for a class of Kirchhoff type problems,” Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 387–394, 2010.

Y. Yang and J. Zhang, “Positive and negative solutions of a class of nonlocal problems,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2010.

Y. Yang and J. Zhang, “Nontrivial solutions of a class of nonlocal problems via local linking theory,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 377–380, 2010.

C. Chen, Y. Kuo, and T. Wu, “The Nehari manifold for a Kirchhoff type problem involving sign-changing weight functions,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 250, no. 4, pp. 1876–1908, 2011.

J. Sun and C. Tang, “Existence and multiplicity of solutions for Kirchhoff type equations,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 1212–1222, 2011.

J. Sun and S. Liu, “Nontrivial solutions of Kirchhoff type problems,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 500–504, 2012.

A. Mao and S. Luan, “Sign-changing solutions of a class of nonlocal quasilinear elliptic boundary value problems,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 383, no. 1, pp. 239–243, 2011.

B. T. Cheng, “New existence and multiplicity of nontrivial solutions for nonlocal elliptic Kirchhoff type problems,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 394, no. 2, pp. 488–495, 2012.

S. J. Chen and L. Li, “Multiple solutions for the nonhomogeneous Kirchhoff equation on RN,” Nonliear Analysis: Real World Applications, vol. 14, pp. 1477–1486, 2012.

J. Jin and X. Wu, “Infinitely many radial solutions for Kirchhoff-type problems in ,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 369, no. 2, pp. 564–574, 2010.

X. Wu, “Existence of nontrivial solutions and high energy solutions for Schrödinger-Kirchhoff-type equations in ,” Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1278–1287, 2011.

A. Azzollini, P. d'Avenia, and A. Pomponio, “Multiple critical points for a class of nonlinear functionals,” Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, vol. 190, no. 3, pp. 507–523, 2011.

H. Berestycki and P.-L. Lions, “Nonlinear scalar field equations. II: existence of infinitely many solutions,” Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 347–375, 1983.

X. He and W. Zou, “Existence and concentration behavior of positive solutions for a Kirchhoff equation in ,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 252, no. 2, pp. 1813–1834, 2012.

J. Nie and X. Wu, “Existence and multiplicity of non-trivial solutions for SchrödingerKirchhoff-type equations with radial potential,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 75, no. 8, pp. 3470–3479, 2012.

C. O. Alves and G. M. Figueiredo, “Nonlinear perturbations of a periodic Kirchhoff equation in ,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 2750–2759, 2012.

W. Liu and X. He, “Multiplicity of high energy solutions for superlinear Kirchhoff equations,” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, vol. 39, no. 1-2, pp. 473–487, 2012.

J. Sun, H. Chen, and J. J. Nieto, “On ground state solutions for some non-autonomous Schrödinger-Poisson systems,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 252, no. 5, pp. 3365–3380, 2012.

Z. Wang and H. Zhou, “Positive solutions for a nonhomogeneous elliptic equation on without (AR) condition,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 353, no. 1, pp. 470–479, 2009.

C. Liu, Z. Wang, and H. Zhou, “Asymptotically linear Schrödinger equation with potential vanishing at infinity,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 245, no. 1, pp. 201–222, 2008.

I. Ekeland, “On the variational principle,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 324–353, 1974.

J. Mawhin and M. Willem, Critical Point Theory and Hamiltonian Systems, vol. 74 of Applied Mathematical Sciences, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1989.