Advances in Agriculture

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 870864, 15 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/870864

Research Article

Agromorphological Traits Variability of the Ethiopian Lentil and Exotic Genotypes

Fikru Mekonnen,¹ Firew Mekbib,¹ Shiv Kumar,² Seid Ahmed,³ and Tilak R. Sharma⁴

¹School of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Haramaya University, P.O. Box 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia

²International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Tel Hadya, P.O. Box 5466 Aleppo, Syria

³International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), P.O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

⁴Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur 176 062, India

Received 18 February 2014; Accepted 23 May 2014; Published 22 June 2014

Academic Editor: Ayman Suleiman

Copyright © 2014 Fikru Mekonnen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Understanding the genetic relationships and diversity of Ethiopian lentil in relation to lentil from other countries is important in attempting to widen the genetic base of germplasm in the country. The objectives of this study were to generate information on agromorphological variability, to estimate PCV, GCV, heritability, and expected genetic advance of quantitative traits of lentil. 228 genotypes with different population types were studied for 11 agromorphological traits and rust disease severity score for two seasons (2011-2012) over three locations. The analysis of variance showed highly significant variations () among genotypes for all characters studied. As per genetic parameter values, four groups of character were deduced. It is inferred that the exotic genotypes introduced from ICARDA showed rich genetic bases for 100-seed weight, number of seeds per plant, seed weight per plant, resistance source for rust, and high yielder in high yielding environment, where rainfall is not a major problem. Use the Ethiopian accessions for developing cultivars that could be used in double cropping and drought prone areas.

1. Introduction

Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik. subsp. culinaris) is a short, slender annual cool-season food legume. The center of origin of lentil is the Near East where it was first domesticated in the Fertile Crescent around 7000 BC [1]. According to Barulina [2], two varietal types based on seed size were recognized: the small-seeded microsperma and the macrosperma with relatively large flattened pods. The largest lentil producer is India, followed by Canada and Turkey, accounting for 68% of the global production [3]. In Africa, Ethiopia, Morocco, and Tunisia are the leading producers, but 61% of the areas and 68% of the production belong to Ethiopia [4]. Lentil is an important dietary source of macro- and micronutrients for both rural and urban dwellers. It provides sufficient amounts of the most essential amino acids to meet nutrient requirements. It is a cash crop fetching the highest price in domestic market compared to all other food legumes and major cereal crops [5]. Global, African, and Ethiopian lentil productivity is about 887 kg/ha, 644 kg/ha [3], and 1168 kg/ha, respectively [6]. Biotic and abiotic factors limit lentil productivity and seed quality. The major yield gap contributing factors are insect pests, diseases, low yielding landraces grown by farmers, and the narrow genetic base [7, 8].

Prior knowledge of genetic variability and characterization of genetic resources within the germplasm available at a gene bank has an important implication for future utilization and collection activities, to identify areas of major priority for conservation and improvement programs [9]. Quantitative traits provide an estimate of genetic diversity, and various numerical taxonomic techniques have been successfully used to classify and measure the pattern of genetic diversity in germplasm, as in lentil [10, 11]. Morphological characterization is the first step in the classification and description of any crop germplasm [12]. The assessment of genetic variability present in a given crop population can be determined by using the biometrical components such as range, variance, coefficient of variation, standard error, and heritability. The relative magnitude of these components determines the genetic properties of the population, in particular, the degree of resemblance between germplasm, that is, various determinants of the phenotype [13]. Reference [14] emphasized that the uses of the genetic coefficient of variability together with heritability and genetic advance values would determine the best picture of the amount of progress to be expected from a selection and determine the selection method to improve a character.

Several researchers investigated the diversity of economically important traits of lentil germplasm and found considerable variations [10, 11, 15–20]. Some quantitative evaluations of the Ethiopian landraces revealed potential variability for morphological traits [5, 7, 8, 21–25]. Understanding the genetic relationships and diversity of the Ethiopian lentil in relation to the germplasm from other countries is important to widen the genetic base of a germplasm. However, information is not exhaustive for different population structures of local and exotic genotypes on the genetic variability of important traits, which have economic benefit. Hence, the objectives of this study were to generate information on morphological variability and to estimate the phenotypic coefficient of variation, the genetic coefficient of variation, the heritability, and genetic advance of quantitative traits in lentil.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Description of the Study Sites

The field experiments were conducted on a hot spot area for rust. The areas included Sirinka Agricultural Research Center (SIARC) in the northeastern part of Ethiopia for two seasons (2011 and 2012), Chefe Donsa in the central part of Ethiopia, and Sinana Agricultural Research Center (SARC) in southeastern part of Ethiopia during the 2011/12 cropping season (Table 1 and Figure 1).

Table 1: Geographical, climatic, and soil features of the experimental sites.

Agroecological
Sirinka
Sinana
Chefe Donsa

Range of temperature (°C)
21–32
9.3–20.9
8.9–28.3

Mean annual rainfall (mm)
876
808
851

Altitude (masl)
1850
2450
1900

Latitude
12°.11′N
7°7′N
8°44′N

Longitude
39°62′E
40°10′E
39°95′E

Soil texture
Clay soil
Clay soil
Light soil

Soil type
Eutric vertisol black soil
Pellic vertisol slightly acidic
Afisols and vertisol black soil

Figure 1: Geographical position of the experimental sites.

2.2. Plant Materials

Out of the 228 genotypes considered for this study, 158 were planted for morphological evaluation at SRARC in the 2010/2011 cropping season. Of these, 104 genotypes were from the Ethiopian lentil gene pool collected from six major lentil production regions (Figure 2) and were kept by the Institute of Biodiversity Conservation (IBC). The accessions represent over 17% of the 618 lentil accession holdings of IBC. Rust susceptible check/EL-142/and wilt susceptible check/ILL-590/NEL 590/, as well as six commercial national released varieties (Alemaya, Adaa, Teshale, Alem Tena, Chekol and Derash), were used as a check. Ten elite breeding lines from the DebreZeit Agricultural Research Station (DZARC), Ethiopia, were included. Thirty-six parental lines and elite lines based on superiority for agronomic traits introduced from the International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA) were included (Table 2). In the 2011/12 cropping season, 228 genotypes plus RILs were included in the study across three locations: Sirinka, Chefe Donsa, and Sinana.

Table 2: List of genotypes and their origin.

Source of origin
Number of genotypes
Name of genotype
Type of genotypes

Tigray
8
Acc. no. 219957, 235383, 237503, 237504, 241785, 242604, 243447
Landrace

Amhara
54
Acc. no. 36003, 36025, 36028, 36039, 36041, 36061, 36071, 36085, 36088, 36089, 36097, 36103, 36104, 36105, 36137, 36139, 36150, 36162, 36165, 36168, 207258, 207274, 207287, 207309, 212745, 215248, 215249, 223221, 228242, 229179, 229182, 229183, 231247, 235013, 235015, 235016, 235017, 236484, 236486, 236487, 237502, 238978, 238979, 241784, 241786, 243433, 243436, 243440, 243443, 244606, 244610, 244615, 244619, 244623
Landrace

Oromya
29
Acc. no. 36001, 36007, 36009, 36013, 36015, 36019, 36023, 36029, 36033, 36042, 36048, 36058, 36110, 36120, 36131, 203141, 215806, 216877, 228809, 230521, 230833, 230834, 230837, 231248, 235698, 236438, 236892, 237027, 238971
Landrace

SNNP
2
Acc. no. 36147 and Acc. No., 228243
Landrace

Somali
1
Acc. no. 230832
Landrace

DZARC
6
/ILL4225 x ILL4605/ /ILL 6821/ Alemaya, /ILL 1 x ILL 1169//ILL 6027/ ADAA, /ILL 7978/ Teshale, /Alemaya x FLIP88-41L/ Derash, /ILL 7981/ Aleme Tena and P160/ILL 2704/ /Chekol/
Improved variety

Unknown
10
Acc. no. 36134, 207260, 211062, 211078, 211110, 220120, 211131, 233349, 233973, 241782
Landrace

ICARDA
22
L-9-11, X2002S 219 /ILL 6821/, X2002S 221 /7980/, X2002S 221/FLIP 96-47 L//7979/, X2003S 195/ILL 7115/, /ILL4965 x ILL6155/FLIP-97-16L/ILL 8078/, /ILL 883 x ILL 470/FLIP-84-95L/ILL 5722/, X2003S 233 /ILL 8009/, 2003S 235, X2003S 238 /ILL 4605/, X2005S 215/ILL 6002/, 2006S 122 /FLIP 2003-43L/ /ILL 7010 x ILL 1939/ /ILL 9932/, /ILL 2573 x ILL 7537/ /FLIP 2003-62 L/ /ILL 9951/X2006S 122, /ILL 7620 x ILL 9151/ /FLIP 2003-56L/ /ILL 9945/X2006S 127, X2006S 129/F2/, X2006S 130/FLIP 93-46L/ /ILL 547/, X2006S 130/FLIP 96-46 L//ILL 7978/, X2006S 133/FLIP87-21L/ /ILL 4349 x ILL4605//ILL 6211/, X2006S 134/ILL8174/, X2002S 219 /shehor-74/ /ILL 7554/, X2003S 222/ILL 213/, X2006S 128/ILL 5480/
Parent

DARC
11
EL-142/ILL 5071/, 87S-93549XEL-1O3-3, 87s-93549XEL-03-4, Chekol X R-186-1, Chekol x R-186-2, EL-142 X R-186-3, EXOTIC DZ/2008 AK, Chekol x R-186-8-0, ILL-358 X ILL-2573-2-2000, R-186X FLIP-86-38L, R-186XFLIP-86-38L-23
Breeding line

ICARDA
15
ILL-28501, FLIP-04-26L, FLIP-2004-37L, FLIP-2004-7L, FLIP-2006-20L, FLIP-2006-60L, FLIP-87-68L, FLIP-93-63L, FLIP-97-61L, FLIP-97-68L, /ILL 6037 x ILX 87062/ FLIP2005-24L/ ILL-10045, ILL-10680, ILL-590/NEL 590/, L-830, Precoze/ILL 4605/
Breeding line

ICARDA
70
RIL1-RIL 70
RIL

Genotypes represent different population groups of lentil germplasm such as landrace, elite breeding lines, putative parents, and recombinant inbred lines (RIL).

Unknown = originated from Ethiopia but sites of collection are not mentioned.

RIL = recombinant inbred line.

Figure 2: Map of Ethiopia showing areas of collection sites (shaded region) of the landrace accessions.

2.3. Experimental Layout and Design

A randomized complete block design (RCBD) was used with three replications, in the 2010/2011 cropping season at SIARC. A unit plot comprised 2-meter length row with a plot size of (0.8 m²). Row-to row distance was 20 cm. The distance between two plots was 50 cm and the distance between two blocks was 100 cm. The genotypes were planted in the first week of July. In the 2011/12 cropping season, the experiment was carried out using the augmented design with a single row of 2 m length for each genotype planted in five blocks. Eight checks were replicated within each block. Planting was done in the first week of July at SIARC, in mid-August at Chefe Donsa and in mid-September at SARC. The recommended agronomic packages were applied for raising a successful crop.

2.4. Data Collection

Data were recorded on 10 randomly selected plants on plant basis for plant height (PH), number of pods/plant (NP), number of seeds/pod (NS), number of seeds/plant (NSPP), and seed weight/plant (SWPP), whereas days to flowering (DFF), days to maturity (DM), above ground biomass (BI), 100-seed weight in gram (SW), seed yield/plant (SY), pod set score (PSS) (1–9 rating scale where 1 = very poor pod setting and 9 = excellent pod setting), and rust severity scored on a 1–9 scale (1–9 rating scale where 1 = highly resistant and 9 = highly susceptible) before flowering (RSBF) and after flowering (RSAF) were recorded on plot basis according to [26].

2.5. Data Analysis

Plot mean values were calculated for all traits and used for the analysis of variance (ANOVA). The estimation of genetic parameters was analyzed using GenStat Release 13.3. [27]. Phenotypic and genotypic variances for the augmented design were computed for all traits based on the methods of [28]. The pooled analysis for augmented design was carried out according to [29, 30] using GenStat Release 15.1 [31]. The broad sense of heritability () was estimated using the genotype mean according to [14]. Consider

Genetic advance (GA) for selection intensity () at 5% is estimated according to [14] using the formula: .

The genetic advance as the percentage of the mean (GAM) was estimated as per [32] formula: .

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of Variance

Highly significant genotypic () differences were observed for all parameters measured in the 2010/11 cropping season at Sirinka indicating that the variation was genetic. The mean square, CV, and mean values for traits of the genotype were presented in Table 3.

Table 3: Mean squares for agromorphological traits of 158 lentil genotypes at Sirinka in the 2010/11 cropping season.

Sources of variation
df
Mean squares

DFF
DM
NP
NS
SWPP
NSPP
PH
SW
BI
SY
PSS

Replication
2
561.9
1248.1
3067.3
1.27
2.1
8980.1
379.2
0.01
6475
46675.2
0.2

Genotype
157
70.6**
408.3**
359.7**
0.3**
0.7**
859.2**
48.7**
0.99**
35878**
4645.4**
1.8**

Error
314
13.9
45.47
126.3
0.06
0.17
200.3
8.13
0.1
6140
994
0.2

CV

6.5
7
31.9
19.9
36.8
33
8.2
12.2
27.3
37.1
9.7

Mean

57.2
95.7
35.3
1.2
1.1
42.9
34.6
2.5
286.8
84.9
5

LSD (at 5%)

6
11.1
30.5
0.4
0.6
23.4
0.5
4.6
112.7
47.9
0.8

df = Degree of Freedom

DF = days to 50% flowering, DM = days to 90% maturity, NP = number of pods per plant, NS = number of seeds per pod, SWPP = Seed Weight per Plant, NSPP = Number of Seeds per Plant, PH = Plant height in cm, SW = 100-seed weight in gram, BI = Bio mass, PSS = Pod set Score

**, * = Significant at 5% and 1% probability levels, respectively.

Moderate variabilities with an intermediate coefficient of variation (CV) among the genotypes were observed for days to 50% flowering, days to 90% maturity, plant height, and pod set score, whereas considerable variations were observed for the rest of the traits among the genotypes (Table 3).

The analysis of variance for the 2011/12 cropping season within the check showed significant variation at Sirinka, except for two traits: number of seeds/pods and number of seeds/plant (Table 4). At Chefe Donsa, days to 50% flowering, number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pods, number of seeds/plant, and seed weight/plant had nonsignificant variation within the checks (Table 5). At Sinana, all traits showed significant variability, except days to 50% flowering, days to 90% maturity, number of seeds/pods, and above ground biomass within the checks (Table 6). Consistent significant variations were noted across locations within the checks for plant height, 100-seed weight, and seed yield (Tables 4, 5, and 6).

Table 4: Mean squares for agromorphological traits of 228 lentil genotypes at Sirinka in the 2011/12 cropping season.

Sources of Variation
df
Mean squares

DFF
DM
NP
NS
NSPP
SWPP
PH
SW
BI
SY

Block
4
413.4**
350.5**
983.2*
0.21**
1693.6*
1.16
35.49*
0.8*
113623**
8974

Within checks
7
155.5**
504.6**
734.6*
0.1
1213.8
1.9*
37.3*
2.3**
67151*
9542*

Within test genotypes
219
91.9**
182.5**
1053.4**
0.2**
722.7
0.5
243.0*
0.5*
18463
2807

Between check and test genotypes
1
0.6
35.2
995.1
0.3**
5227.6**
13.2**
18.2
4.6**
437621**
110311**

Residual
35
14.1
34.1
302
0.04
546.1
0.7
13.5
0.3
24236
3801

df = degree of freedom.

DFF = days to 50% flowering, DM = days to 90 maturity, NP = number of pods per plant, NS = number of seeds per pod, SWPP = seed weight per plant, NSPP = number of seeds per plant, PH = plant height in cm, SW = 100-seed weight in gram, BI = biomass, PSS = pod set score.

**, * = significant at 5% and 1% probability levels, respectively.

Table 5: Mean squares for agromorphological traits of 228 lentil genotypes at Chefe Donsa in the 2011/12 cropping season.

Sources of variation
df
Mean squares

DFF
DM
NP
NS
NSPP
SWPP
PH
SW
BI
SY
RSAF

Block
4
24.4
327.9**
664.7*
0.03
1489.4*
1.4*
12.6*
0.7**
77552**
3332*
10.3**

Within check
7
12.6
223.6*
51.6
0.04
292.6
0.4
22.0**
1.2**
23490*
3363*
17.2**

Within test genotypes
219
30.4**
133.3
184.3
0.06
495.7
0.3
15.0**
0.6**
8941
1314
4.8**

Between check and test genotypes
1
101.5**
105
988.5*
0.1
1127.8
2.3*
7.7
0.03
227174**
41227**
27.3**

Residual
35
12.1
83.4
188.2
0.06
560.1
0.4
4.5
0.1
10084
1183
2

, * = Significant at 5% and 1% probability levels, respectively.

Table 6: Mean squares for agromorphological traits of 228 lentil genotypes at Sinana in the 2011/12 cropping season.

Sources of variation
df
Mean squares

DFF
DM
NP
NS
NSPP
PH
SW
BI
SY
RSBF
RSAF

Block
4
305.8**
2224*
50.9
0.04
319.6*
147.8**
1.3**
153488**
6897.6**
5.1**
16.1**

Within check
7
224.2
2473.1
76.5**
0.1
274.5*
53.7*
2.6**
30505
6842.8**
1.7*
5.9

Within test genotypes
219
10054.6**
36536
65.6**
0.1*
256.2**
29.3
0.7**
34051
1279.1*
2.0**
4.6

Between check and test genotypes
1
0.05
121.1
124.6*
0.2
345.1
184.9**
3.0**
474202**
80244.5**
10.8**
69.1**

Residual
35
19.1
244.6
30
0.1
116.5
23
0.1
29335
823.2
0.8
3.8

RSBF; Rust disease severity score before flowering.

RSAF; Rust disease severity score after flowering.

**, * = Significant at 5% and 1% probability levels, respectively.

The analysis of variance showed a highly significant variation () for days to 50% flowering, days to 90% maturity, number of pods/plant, and number of seeds/pods within the test genotypes at Sirinka (Table 4). At Chefe Donsa, analysis depicted a highly significant variation () within test genotypes for days to 50% flowering, plant height, 100-seed weight, and rust disease severity score after flowering (Table 5), whereas at Sinana all traits revealed significant variation () except days to 90% maturity, plant height, above ground biomass, and rust disease severity score after flowering within test genotypes (Table 6).

The analysis of variance between check and test genotypes for the 2011/12 cropping season showed highly significant differences except for days to 50% flowering, days to 90% maturity, number of pods/plant, and plant height at Sirinka (Table 4). At Chefe Donsa, significant () variations were observed for days to 50% flowering, number of pods/plant, seed weight/plant, above ground biomass, seed yield, and rust disease severity score between checks and test genotypes (Table 5), whereas, at Sinana, significant variations were recorded between checks and test genotypes for number of pods/plant, plant height, 100-seed weight, seed yield, and rust severity score before and after flowering (Table 6). The test for homogeneity of error variance was significant across locations because the genotypes perform differently across the three locations for yield and yield component traits. Thus, it could not make further valid inferences for the pooled ANOVA (Table 7). Besides, rust infection was severe at Sinana, mild at Chefe Donsa, and absent at Sirinka and then no combined analysis was made for this character.

Table 7: Mean squares of the combined analysis of variance for lentil yield and yield component traits and mean values for each location in the 2011/12 cropping season.

Sources of variation
df
DFF
DM
NP
NS
NSPP
PH
SW
BI
SY

Environment mean squares
2
754.0**
1065.0**
557.9**
17188.6**
162.1**
2028.3**
153.2**
1031.6**
343.1**

Genotype mean squares
227
3.6**
1.2NS
0.4NS
0.01NS
0.2NS
0.9**
8.9**
0.4**
1.1**

Residual mean squares
454
1.5
1.61
1.6
0.9
0.7
0.4
1.7
0.2
0.5

Range

41–91
60–131
12.1–298
0.4–2.6
20.6–64.3
22.7–47
0.8–5.1
204.5–632
19.8–172

Sirinka mean

56.4
91.4
37.4
1.2
43.77
33.9
2.7
269.8
83.2

Chefe Donsa mean

56.1
114.5
29
1.5
43.8
27.71
2.8
269.4
86.8

Sinana mean

66.3
104.6
19.2
1.9
34
40.5
2.4
521.3
44

Environment mean

64
105
30
1.6
40
36
2.5
400
60

df = degree of freedom.

DFF = days to 50% flowering, DM = days to 90 maturity, NP = number of pods per plant, NS = number of seeds per pod, SWPP = seed weight per plant, NSPP = number of seeds per plant, PH = plant height in cm, SW = 100-seed weight in gram, BI = biomass, PSS = pod set score.

**, * = significant at 5% and 1% probability levels, respectively.

NS = nonsignificant.

The minimum and maximum values of 11 agromorphological traits analyzed for the 2010/2011 cropping season at Sirinka were presented in (Table 8). The range for days to 50% flowering was recorded from 42 to 78 days for Acc. number 36120 and breeding line (FLIP-04-26L), respectively (Table 12). The shortest maturity period was recorded (77 days) for Acc. number 36025 and the longest (138 days) for FLIP-04-26L. Parent X2003S 223 produced the minimum (1.6) number of pods/plant while the maximum (73.3 pods/plant) was noted for breeding line (R-186XFLIP-86-38L-24). The shortest plant height of 20.6 cm was recorded for breeding line (FLIP-97-61L) and the highest was 44.7 cm for Acc. number 36001. The minimum number of seeds/pod was recorded (0.5 seed) for landrace (Acc. number 36098) and the maximum (2 seeds) for parent line (X2003S 233/8009/). Seed weight/plant ranged from 0.1 g for parent line X2002S 219/shehor-74/7554 to 3.4 g for breeding line R-186XFLIP-86-38L-24 (Table 12). The number of seeds/plant ranged from 5.5 for landrace (Acc. number 36098) to 103.1 for lines R-186XFLIP-86-38L-24. The largest seed size was observed for parent line FLIP-2004-7L (4.9 g) while the parent line X2003S 233/8009/had a minimum seed weight of 1.4 g. The lowest biomass/plant was recorded for the parent line X2003S 223 (35 g), and the highest biomass/plant was recorded for the parent line X2006S 128/5480/(767.8 g). The lowest seed yield (0 g) was recorded for landrace X2003S 223 whereas breeding line ILL-590 showed the highest seed yield (347.2 g) (Table 12).

Table 8: Genetic parameter estimates for agromorphological characters of lentil genotypes at Sirinka 2010/11 cropping season.

Traits
Mean
Range
GV
PV
PCV
GCV

GA
GAM

DFF
57.2
42–78
18.7
32.5
7.6
10
57.3
6.8
11.8

DM
95.7
77–138
119.3
164.8
11.5
13.5
72.4
19.2
20.1

NP
35.3
1.6–73.3
76.4
202.9
25
40.5
37.7
11.1
31.5

NS
1.2
0.5–2.0
0.1
0.18
22.6
30.1
56
0.4
34.8

PWPP
1.5
0.24–8.1
0.7
0.8
58.4
60.7
92.6
1.7
15.8

SWPP
1.1
0.1–3.4
0.2
0.3
36.3
51.6
48.9
0.6
52

NSPP
42.9
5.5–103.1
215.4
416.2
34.6
47.8
51.8
21.9
51

PH
34.6
20.6–44.7
13.4
21.6
10.6
13.4
62.3
6
17.3

SW
2.5
1.38–4.9
0.3
0.4
21.7
24.9
75.8
1
38.9

BI
286.8
35–767.8
9806.7
15955
34.7
44.2
61.5
160.5
56

SY
84.9
0–347.2
1192.3
2188.7
41.1
55.4
54.5
52.8
62.2

PSS
5
2–7
0.5
0.7
14
17.1
66
1.2
23.2

Triats, DFF = days to 50% flowering, DM = days to 90% maturity, NP = number of pods per plant, NS = number of seeds per pod, NSPP = number of seeds per plant, PH = plant height in cm, SW = 100-seed weight in gram, BI = above ground biomass, SY = seed yield.

GV = genotypic variance, PV = phenotypic variance, GCV = genetic coefficient of variation, PCV = phenotypic coefficient of variation, h ² = broad sense of heritability, GA = genetic advance, GAM = genetic advance as the percentage of the mean.

3.2. Phenotypic and Genotypic Coefficients of Variation

Though variability in population is an indispensable prerequisite for any improvement, it is not the only criterion for deciding as to which trait is showing the highest degree of variability. Phenotype coefficient of variation (PCV) and genotype coefficient of variation (GCV) can help in this regard. Estimates of genetic parameter are shown in Tables 8, 9, 10, and 11. PCV and GCV values of approximately more than 20% are regarded as high, whereas values less than 10% are considered low and values in between are considered as medium [33]. Based on this delineation, high PCV and GCV values were recorded for number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod, pod weight/plant, seed weight/plant, number of seeds/plant, 100 seed weight, above ground biomass, and seed yield. However, days to 50% flowering, days to 90% maturity, and plant height showed lower GCV and PCV values in the 2010/2011 cropping season. In the 2011/12 cropping season, similar GCV and PCV patterns were recorded across the three locations for number of pods/plant, seed weight/plant, number of seeds/plant, above ground biomass, seed yield, and rust disease score, whereas low PCV and GCV were noted for number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pods, seed weight/plant, and number of seeds/plant at Chefe Donsa.

Table 9: Genetic parameter estimates for agromorphological characters of lentil genotypes at Sirinka 2011/12 cropping season.

Traits
Test genotype mean
Check mean
Grand mean
GV
PV
PCV
GCV

GA
GAM

DFF
56.3
56.3
56.3
77.4
93
15.6
17.1
83.3
16.6
29.4

DM
91.7
91.2
91.7
145.2
182
13.1
14.7
79.8
22.2
24.2

NP
35.7
45.2
35.7
714.7
1025.1
75
89.8
69.7
45.9
128.8

NS
1.2
1.3
1.2
0.1
0.2
27.6
34.3
65
0.6
49.9

NSPP
40.7
59.6
40.7
146.4
176.8
32.7
32.7
82.8
22.7
55.7

SW
2.7
3.1
2.7
0.2
0.5
18.6
27.6
45.6
0.7
24.6

PH
33.5
35.2
33.5
8.3
23.6
8.6
14.5
35
3.5
10.5

BI
245.9
392.3
245.9
5051
21656
28.9
59.8
23.3
70.6
28.7

SY
75.2
149.2
75.2
962
3429
41.2
77.8
28.1
33.9
45.1

Traits, DFF = days to 50% flowering, DM = days to 90% maturity, NP = number of pods per plant, NS = number of seeds per pod, NSPP = number of seeds per plant, PH = plant height in cm, SW = 100-seed weight in gram, BI = above ground biomass, SY = seed yield.

GV = genotypic variance, PV = phenotypic variance, GCV = genetic coefficient of variation, PCV = phenotypic coefficient of variation, = broad sense of heritability, GA = genetic advance, GAM = genetic advance as the percentage of the mean.

Table 10: Genetic parameter estimates for agromorphological characters of lentil genotypes at Chefe Donsa 2011/12 cropping season.

Traits
Test genotype mean
Check mean
Grand mean
GV
PV
PCV
GCV

GA
GAM

DFF
55.9
57.3
55.9
14.9
29.3
6.9
9.7
50.6
5.6
10.1

DM
114.1
113.2
114.1
39.4
130.5
5.5
10.0
30.2
7.1
6.2

NP
26.9
35.3
26.9
4.6
185.3
7.9
50.0
2.5
0.7
2.6

NS
1.5
1.4
1.5
0.1
0.1
1.4
15.8
0.7
0.005
0.3

NSPP
41.3
50.2
41.3
2.2
502.4
3.6
53.9
0.4
0.2
0.4

SWPP
1.1
1.4
1.1
0.03
0.3
17.8
54
10.9
0.1
11.2

SW
2.8
2.7
2.8
0.5
0.6
23.7
26.2
81.8
1.3
46.6

PH
27.5
28.5
27.5
6.4
14.3
9.2
13.7
45.2
3.5
12.8

BI
262.6
305.6
262.6
2789.0
9888.0
20
37.6
28.2
57.8
22.0

SY
82.5
107.6
82.5
460.2
1427
25.7
45.3
32.3
25.1
30.5

RSAF
3.6
3.1
3.6
3.1
4.9
49.1
61.7
63.2
2.9
80.1

Table 11: Genetic parameter estimates for agromorphological characters of lentil genotypes at Sinana 2011/12 cropping season.

Traits
Test genotype mean
Check mean
Grand mean
GV
PV
PCV
GCV

GA
GAM

DFF
66.04
66.8
66.1
20.7
66.6
6.9
12.4
31.1
7.9
12.1

DM
105.1
104.5
105.1
86.6
331.2
2.4
15.1
26.1
9.8
9.3

NP
19.2
20.8
19.3
33.7
63.6
30.2
41.4
52.9
8.6
44.4

NSPP
33.9
36.1
34
33.1
149.6
16.9
36
22.1
13.1
38.5

SW
2.38
2.7
2.4
0.6
0.7
32.7
35
87.1
1.51
63.2

PH
40.3
42.6
40.4
7.2
30.1
6.6
13.6
23.7
2.7
6.7

BI
505.1
619.1
509.1
6290
35625
15.6
37.1
17.7
69.9
13.8

SY
40.2
89.6
41.9
809.8
1633
67.9
96.4
49.6
45.8
109.2

RSBF
2
1.5
1.9
1.2
2
55.6
71.9
59.7
1.8
88.9

RSAF
5.8
4.6
5.7
1.2
5.1
19.5
39.4
24.5
1.2
21.1

Table 12: Means for yield and yield components of the genotypes at Sirinka 2010/11.

Genotype name
DF
DM
NP
NSS
PWPP
SWPP
NSPP
PHH
SW
BI
SY
PSS

36001
57
89
39.7
0.9
1.8
1.2
39
44.7
2.6
345.2
78
5

36003
56
91
47.8
0.7
1.9
0.9
45
38.8
2.1
315.7
59.9
6

36007
58
90
38.8
1.8
2
1.5
86
38.4
2.1
359.3
79.6
6

36009
58
90
35.6
1.3
1.4
0.9
47
39.9
1.9
294.8
60.9
5

36013
58
90
39.8
1.2
3.9
2.3
52
39.4
2.1
440.8
74
5

36015
59
98
29.7
1.9
1.9
1.2
52
41.9
2.5
545.8
128.6
5

36019
55
94
41.1
1.2
1.9
1.5
69
37
2.2
311.9
71.6
5

36023
54
84
34.5
0.6
1.6
0.6
41
36.8
2.1
237.8
30.6
5

36025
46
77
34.2
1.1
2
1.1
39
33.6
2.1
254.7
62.2
6

Alemaya
57
107
55.2
1.3
1.5
2.4
70
31.6
3.1
449.6
160.9
6

ADAA
61
128
29.1
1.7
1.9
1.3
43
40.4
2.8
249.7
45.9
4

EL-142
56
93
36.1
1.1
1.1
1
45
35.5
2
321.8
51.1
5

X2003S 222/213/
66
103
32.7
1.1
1.7
1.1
36
36
2
390.8
95.2
4

X2003S 238
55
92
32.5
1.1
2.3
1.4
40
32.2
3.8
377.4
124.8
6

36028
59
98
38.2
0.7
1.4
1.3
52
41.1
2.2
453
145.6
6

36029
57
89
39.9
1.3
2.1
1.1
49
31.8
2.3
331.6
76.7
5

36033
55
86
37.4
1
1.3
1
37
33.8
2.4
257.9
78.4
7

36039
55
88
43.5
1.2
2.1
1.2
68
33.6
2.3
181.4
60.9
5

36041
56
89
55.4
1.1
1.8
1.4
60
34.7
2.1
246.5
75.9
5

36048
57
88
52.7
0.9
1
1.3
49
35.1
1.8
280.4
89.2
5

36058
51
84
41.1
0.6
0.9
0.8
40
32.1
2.9
170.5
55.2
6

36061
54
82
36.3
0.6
0.8
0.6
22
30.5
2
163.3
30.8
6

TESHALE
56
98
26.9
1.2
2
1.3
34
33.7
3.6
372.9
119.7
5

X2006S 128/5480/
77
125
50
1.2
4.6
2
59
42.9
2.8
767.8
153.3
3

L-9-12
59
114
35.3
1
1.5
1.2
38
36.7
3.6
316
74
4

36071
57
91
33.1
0.9
1
0.9
39
41.5
2.4
406.5
104.6
6

36085
57
91
58
1.2
2
1.9
77
39.8
3
392.7
117.2
6

36088
57
95
34.4
1.1
1.2
0.9
40
37.5
3
399.6
115.3
5

36089
60
97
32.7
1.1
0.5
1.1
41
33.3
2.3
237.2
105.8
5

36097
58
98
56.4
1
1.7
1.5
75
34.9
2.4
288.9
86.5
4

36098
56
106
18.3
0.5
0.5
0.2
6
29.9
2.1
71.1
0.1
4

36103
53
86
27.5
1.4
1.3
1
36
35.6
2.5
274.4
90.9
5

36104
53
88
37.2
1.1
1.7
1.3
45
34.9
2.7
274.5
77.3
6

36105
56
87
29.7
1.1
0.3
0.8
33
29.8
3.1
145
41.6
5

211062
60
91
38.9
1.6
1.9
1.6
63
37
2
449.4
93.9
5

X2003S 195
72
130
35.2
1.2
1.5
1.1
43
34.6
2.5
287.1
84.3
5

X2002S 219/6821/
57
96
35.2
1.2
1.5
1.1
43
34.6
2.5
287.1
84.3
5

X2006S 129/F2
51
94
28.6
1.2
1.5
1.1
43
34.6
2.5
287.1
84.3
5

36110
57
91
40.9
1.7
2.1
1.7
68
39.8
2.2
374.5
136.5
5

36120
42
87
23.3
0.5
1
0.4
12
25.7
2.2
174
30.3
7

36131
59
92
36.3
1.6
1.2
1.4
59
37.1
2.1
369
127.4
5

36042
54
84
45.5
0.8
2.2
0.9
37
35.4
1.9
223.4
48
6

36137
59
99
33.2
1.4
1.5
0.9
44
34
2.1
251
78.6
4

36139
53
97
40.7
0.9
1.8
0.7
34
35.8
2
243.6
55.8
6

36147
60
99
48
1.1
1.8
1.2
50
38.8
2.4
331.6
97.7
6

36150
56
89
34.4
1.3
1.9
0.8
46
35.9
2.4
261.6
76.3
5

36162
57
100
34.7
1.3
2
1
43
36.6
2.3
237.1
67
5

36165
57
95
30.3
1.4
0.9
1
44
39
2.4
313.9
83.4
6

X2005S 215/6002/
57
96
34.1
0.8
1.6
1
25
40.8
3.9
329.8
101.7
5

36168
59
104
26.6
1
1.1
0.9
27
34.1
2.5
267.5
89.7
5

203141
59
90
41.1
1
1.5
1.3
42
35.4
2.3
320.5
118.4
5

207258
58
90
50
1
1.3
1.2
47
39.1
2.6
324.7
104.2
6

207274
59
91
39.9
1.1
1.5
1.3
48
38.1
2.3
272.5
99.2
5

207260
58
94
40.9
1.2
0.9
1.1
52
38.3
2.3
340.3
92.7
5

207287
52
91
46.4
1.1
2.3
1.4
51
35.1
2.2
311.9
107.1
6

207309
57
89
36.9
1
1.3
1
35
31.8
2.3
248.1
57
5

211078
54
88
47.9
1.4
2.1
1.5
61
31
2.1
218.6
70.3
6

211131
53
87
40.7
1.7
1.4
1.8
65
32.3
2
260.4
102
6

212745
57
91
36.3
1.5
1.9
1.2
57
33.3
2.2
322.7
106.9
7

X2006S 133/6211/
53
98
18
1.3
1.2
0.7
20
30.5
3.7
135.5
36.4
5

238979
59
91
60.1
1.3
2.3
1.9
81
33
2.1
259.2
88.6
5

215248
56
87
45.5
1.2
1.5
1.2
51
31.4
2.2
237.5
71.4
5

215249
58
90
39.7
1.4
1.1
1.6
53
35.7
2.4
265.7
87
5

215806
58
91
26
1.8
0.8
0.8
35
32.9
2.5
189.6
56.8
5

216877
58
92
29.3
1.3
0.6
0.8
35
33.4
2.1
226.8
82.4
4

220120
56
91
23.6
1.3
0.7
0.6
27
37.7
2
149.7
34.9
6

223221
58
89
23.3
1.5
0.8
0.7
35
34.7
2
216.9
72.8
5

228242
59
90
34.9
1.8
1.5
1.4
65
37.3
2.2
259.5
83.5
5

228243
59
87
24.6
1.9
0.6
0.5
43
33.1
2
132.5
35.2
5

228809
53
87
32.4
0.6
1
0.7
21
35.9
2
231.1
63.9
5

219957
53
97
31.3
1.2
0.5
1
41
37.3
2.5
351.3
107.4
6

211110
59
91
38.9
1.8
1.6
1.2
62
38.4
1.8
390
96.3
5

229179
59
97
29.7
1.8
1.1
0.9
53
40.3
2.2
296.5
72.3
5

229182
59
95
40.5
1
1.1
1.1
43
41
2.2
342.6
83.3
5

229183
59
92
29.8
1.3
1
0.8
40
36
2.2
265.6
64.8
5

230521
59
93
28.7
1.3
1.2
0.7
40
38.2
1.9
366.7
99.2
5

230832
59
93
43.3
1.3
0.9
1
54
38.2
1.7
270.8
81.8
5

230833
59
93
52.6
1
1.1
1.4
60
36.9
2
327.3
91.5
5

230834
58
93
27
1.5
1
0.7
37
34.7
1.8
346.2
94.1
4

230837
58
90
44.9
0.8
1.6
1
35
35.9
1.9
402.6
118.2
4

231247
59
93
36.4
1.2
1.1
1.1
44
35.6
2.3
297.5
103.4
6

231248
58
88
42.6
0.7
1
1
29
32.2
2.4
301.5
89.7
5

X2006S 130/7547/
54
86
20.9
0.7
0.7
0.4
13
27.1
2.3
91.8
98.3
6

FLIP-2004-7L
51
99
17.6
1.6
1.4
1.3
28
32
4.9
270.8
92.8
4

233349
57
90
19.8
1.2
1.1
0.6
26
30.2
2.5
159.2
43
5

233973
57
89
30.6
1.5
1.2
1
40
31.8
2.4
252.4
143
4

X2003S 223
66
124
1.6
0.8
8.1
0.4
6
25
2.9
35
0
5

X2003S 195/7115/
57
96
35.2
1.2
1.5
1.1
43
34.6
2.5
287.1
84.3
5

235013
57
91
23.6
1.3
2.3
1.1
31
30.7
2.5
248.3
92.7
5

235015
58
91
45.4
1.1
2.2
1.2
50
35.5
2.4
199.6
66.8
5

235016
58
89
29.2
1.1
1.7
0.9
32
33.3
2.7
284.1
91.6
5

235017
58
91
38.4
1.1
1.3
0.8
42
33
2.4
196.6
66.9
5

235383
57
89
36.2
1.2
1.9
1.2
47
40.8
2.6
310
97.9
6

235698
53
88
52.1
0.8
1.4
1
40
33.6
2.2
196.8
68.3
5

236438
58
90
33.2
0.9
1.2
0.8
30
34.5
2
358.1
113.7
5

236484
57
88
52.2
1
1.7
1.4
51
33.6
2.1
273.1
87
6

X2006S 130/7978/
56
92
40.8
1
1.9
1.6
39
35.9
4.1
334.6
101.3
5

X2002S 221/7979/
46
89
20.5
0.8
0.9
0.6
18
33.3
2.3
176.6
40.7
5

X2002S 221/7980/
58
99
28.9
0.9
1.7
1.5
30
36.1
4.2
310.7
109.1
5

236486
57
88
30.5
0.9
0.8
0.9
34
35
2.2
183.4
61.9
5

236487
53
88
36
1.4
0.8
1
39
33.4
2.3
207.3
73
5

236892
58
91
36.9
1.1
1
0.9
41
37.7
2.2
240.3
59.8
5

237027
50
83
25.3
0.8
1.1
0.7
21
33.3
3.9
146.9
47.3
5

237502
60
90
36.8
1.2
1
0.9
44
33.8
2.1
195.5
54.1
5

237503
59
92
41.8
1.5
1.2
1.4
67
39.3
2.6
279.9
93.9
5

237504
59
92
45.4
0.9
1.8
1.1
39
36.4
2.3
227.3
76.2
5

X2003S 224
57
96
35.2
1.2
1.5
1.1
43
34.6
2.5
287.1
84.3
5

238971
58
90
31
1.5
1.1
0.9
42
32.8
2.5
262.8
80.7
5

238978
60
97
31.2
0.9
0.7
0.8
33
35.8
2.4
247.4
70.7
4

X2003S 233/8009/
51
85
19.8
2
1.4
0.4
29
27.4
1.4
75.8
30.3
2

X2006S 134/8174/
67
119
45
1.2
3.2
1.8
54
40.5
2.9
413.9
75.6
5

X2006S 127
72
124
29.1
0.9
1
0.7
28
31.7
2.2
188.8
28.7
3

241782
59
109
26.6
1.4
0.8
0.6
28
36.2
2.4
268.5
66.5
4

241784
56
90
36
1.2
1.6
1.2
41
36.5
2.6
282
98
6

241785
57
88
35.1
1
1.1
1.1
36
34.8
2.6
276
95.6
5

241786
55
87
51.3
1.2
1.4
1.7
69
35.4
2.4
391.6
145.4
5

242604
58
92
52.6
1.2
2.2
1.8
65
36.3
2.5
392.4
134.8
6

243433
59
94
32.4
0.9
1.4
1
28
32.8
2.3
241.3
73.2
5

243436
59
91
24.1
1.1
1.1
0.6
28
27.2
2.3
117.3
35
5

243440
57
94
30.7
0.7
1.1
1
20
35.8
2.3
244.1
88.5
5

243443
53
94
27.1
1.1
1.5
1
26
34.9
2.5
273.4
82.2
5

243447
53
94
26.9
1.1
2.2
1.1
26
34.7
2.7
257.9
95.7
6

X2006S 122/9932/
54
86
18.1
1
0.9
0.5
20
30.5
2.1
163.4
31.4
5

X2006S 127/9945/
51
90
27.6
0.8
1
0.5
21
28.2
2.4
206.7
42.1
4

244606
53
85
26.6
1.2
1
0.7
34
31.7
2.2
258.2
83.2
5

244610
53
85
33.8
1.3
1.5
0.9
50
34.8
2.2
222.1
86.8
5

244615
58
85
34.7
1.2
1.7
0.9
42
33.6
2.2
261.3
75.8
5

244619
58
87
33.8
1.2
1.2
0.8
32
36.7
2
227.2
65.1
5

244623
53
85
26.4
1
1.3
0.7
29
37.8
2.3
263.2
65.3
5

X2006S 122/9951/
53
88
36.3
1.3
2.1
1.1
41
33
1.8
240.1
64.6
6

X2002S 219/shehor-74/7554
46
82
10.2
0.8
0.7
0.1
8
28.8
2.5
59.7
9.1
6

ILL-590
56
87
40.7
1.3
1.2
1.1
42
35.6
3.2
468.3
347.3
6

X2003S 236
57
96
35.2
1.2
1.5
1.1
43
34.6
2.5
287.1
84.3
6

EXOTIC DZ/2008 AK
61
115
12.2
1.2
1.5
1
16
31.8
3.3
564.3
96.4
5

R-186XFLIP-86-38L-24
60
109
73.3
1.4
1.5
3.4
103
37.1
2.8
642.9
200.9
4

FLIP-2006-60L
54
126
23
1.3
1.5
1
31
24.6
3.4
200
54.3
5

FLIP-97-68L
56
104
46.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
59
31.1
3.1
541.5
165.1
5

ILL-358 X ILL-2573-2-2000
64
112
32
1.4
1.5
1.2
46
30.4
2.9
288.1
99.5
5

FLIP-04-26L
78
138
30
1.1
1.5
1.2
26
38.1
4.2
578.8
61.2
5

ILL-28501
58
114
36.2
1.6
1.5
1.6
59
37.7
3.1
389.1
98
5

87S-93549XEL-1O3-4
47
95
33.2
1.1
1.5
1
37
27.9
2.6
215.8
81.2
5

87s-93549XEL-103-5
57
109
31.6
1.4
1.5
0.9
46
36.4
2.6
374.7
109.7
5

FLIP-2006-20L
74
124
20.4
1
1.5
0.8
21
31.8
3.2
295.8
30.9
5

Derash
57
103
55.5
1.3
1.5
2.5
71
35.6
3
446
162.2
5

ALEMETENA
50
94
25.3
1.2
1.5
1.1
33
21.9
3.6
172.2
85.6
5

Chekol x R-186-8-1
54
109
30.7
1.2
1.5
1.3
38
31.1
3.3
303
119.2
5

R-186X FLIP-86-38L
58
103
27.2
1.8
1.5
1.4
50
31.9
2.5
262.9
80.5
5

FLIP-87-68L
60
122
41
1.3
1.5
1.7
60
29.3
3.1
266
93
5

Chekol
57
98
38
1.4
1.5
1.1
54
29.4
2.3
258.1
104.8
5

ILL-10045
60
115
8.9
1.1
1.5
0.3
10
35.1
3.1
305.2
61.6
5

FLIP-97-16L
61
102
17
1.3
1.5
0.5
28
44.7
2.3
531.7
60.5
5

ILL-10681
63
116
41.5
1.3
1.5
1.9
53
32.1
3.3
202.2
89.7
5

Chekol X R-186-2
61
110
46.9
1.4
1.5
1.6
62
38.4
3.1
345.3
118.8
5

FLIP-2004-37L
63
109
32.1
1.9
1.5
1.3
50
29.1
2.5
181.8
60.1
5

FLIP-84-95L
59
129
12.4
1
1.5
0.5
13
33.2
4.1
295.2
48.6
5

EL-142 X R-186-3
58
112
66
1.4
1.5
2.4
95
37.6
2.4
437.9
156.6
2

FLIP-97-61L
63
129
44
1.4
1.5
2.1
70
20.6
3.2
135.4
46.6
4

36134
55
90
33.1
1.2
1.5
1
37
32.7
2.2
289.2
108
5

GM
57
96
35.3
1.2
1.5
1.1
43
34.6
2.5
286.8
84.9
5

SEM
2.1
3.9
6.5
0.1
0.1
0.2
8.2
1.6
0.2
45.2
18.2
0.3

SE Difference
3
5.5
9.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
11.6
2.3
0.3
64
25.7
0.4

LSD at 5%
6
10.8
18.1
0.4
0.4
0.7
22.7
4.6
0.5
125.9
50.7
0.8

CV%
6.5
7
31.9
19.9
16.5
36.8
33
8.2
12.2
27.3
37.1
9.7

DF = days to 50% flowering, DM = days to 90% maturity, NP = number of pods per plant, NSS = number of seeds per pod, PWPP = Pod weight per plant, SWPP = seed weight per plant, NSPP = number of seeds per plant, PH = plant height in cm, SW = 100-seed weight in gram, BI = biomass, SY = seed yield, PSS = pod set score.

The lowest PCV (10%) was recorded for days to 50% flowering and the highest (60.7%) for pod weight/plant at Sirinka 2010/2011. At Sirinka 2010/2011, GCV values ranged from 7.6% for days to 50% flowering to 58.4% for pod weight/plant (Table 8). The maximum PCV and GCV recorded for number of pods/plant were 89.8 and 75, respectively, at Sirinka 2012, while the lowest PCV and GCV recorded for plant height were 14.5 and 8.6, respectively (Table 9). Days to 90% maturity and 100-seed weight showed moderate GCV. At Chefe Donsa and Sinana, values recorded for both PCV and GCV were similar with those of Sirinka (Tables 10 and 11). Traits such as number of pods/plant, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight, above ground biomass, seed yield, and rust disease score showed relatively high PCV and GCV values across the four environments (Tables 8–11).

3.3. Heritability and Genetic Advance

The broad sense of heritability () estimates of the traits ranged from 0.4% (number of seeds/plant) to 92.6% (pod weight/plant). According to [34], heritability estimate in cultivated plants can be placed in the following categories: heritability estimate ranging from 5 to 10% low, values ranging from 10 to 30% medium, and values 30% and above as high heritability. Based on the above classification, most of the characters have shown high heritability over locations except at Chefe Donsa. At Chefe Donsa, low heritability estimates were recorded for number of seeds/plant (0.4%), number of seeds/pods (0.7%), and number of pods/plant (2.5%) (Table 10). At Sinana, heritability estimates ranged from 18% to 88% for biomass and 100-seed weight, respectively. Days to 90% maturity, number of seeds/plant, plant height, and above ground biomass had a moderate heritability (17.7–26.1%) (Table 11), whereas seed yield, 100-seed weight, rust disease score, number of pods/plant, and number of seeds/plant scored higher heritability.

Consistently higher value of heritability was revealed for days to 50% flowering, 100-seed weight, days to 90% maturity, and plant height over locations. However, all these four characters associated with low genetic advance value (GA) because of low GCV, whereas 100-seed weight, rust severity score, and seed yield showed high heritability values coupled with high genetic advance values across locations because of high of GCV. Numbers of seeds/plant, seed weight/plant, and number of seeds/pod have intermediate GCV and heritability with a mild response to selection.

4. Discussion

Morphological diversity has been used to characterize germplasm from a range of plant species and allows the assessment of genetic diversity. The purpose of this study was to compare the genetic diversity within and among Ethiopian and exotic lentil genotypes of the Ethiopian possessions. In this paper, the characterizations of morphological variation of lentil germplasm using biometrical model was described.

As per ANOVA, highly significant phenotypic () differences were observed for all traits measured indicating the existence of variation. The presence of highly significant variation among the genotypes for the morphological traits was indicative of the presence of high degree of genetic variation for future breeding programs through selection. Similarly, from follow-up study with the simple sequence repeat (SSR), genetic diversity analysis was a supportive evidence of the presence of a considerable variability among both local and exotic lentil genotypes of the Ethiopia germplasm (unpublished data). In agreement with this report, [21, 34–39] reported significant genetic variations among lentil landraces. On the other hand, some studies showed that no significant variation was recorded for some traits, like seed weight/plant and days to flowering [21, 38, 40].

The results recorded for coefficient of variation were comparable with [38] for days to 50% flowering (8.8), plant height (9.1), number of seeds/plant (43.2), and above ground biomass (31.5). However, [38] reported higher values vis-a-vis with this study for days to 90% maturity (19.2), pod weight/plant (47), and seed weight/plant (47.8). In agreement with this finding, [41] also noted comparable range for plant height on 3974 accessions of lentil. However, they recorded a wider range of values for 100-seed weight with an overall mean than with our records on lentil accessions. In another study, [37] reported a narrow range for yield component traits among 46 genotypes from South East Anatolia region of Turkey as opposed to our findings.

Significant variations were noted over locations among the test genotypes and within the checks with a few exceptions. In line with this study, [24] recorded the wide range of genetic variability among yield related characters in exotic lentil lines in Ethiopia. Comparable to our study, [15, 18] noted the presence of variation in characters, such as grain and straw yield, 100-seed weight, days to 50% flowering, days to 90% maturity, number of seeds/pods, plant height, pod number/peduncle, and resistance to various biotic and a biotic stresses in the lentil. Besides, the variation among environments was significant for all morphological traits in view of diverse agro-climatic features of the test sites. Similarly, [42] also observed the greater portion of total variance was due to environment. Reference [5, 7, 23] also reported consistent regional differences among lentil landraces of Ethiopia for time to flowering and maturity, 100-seed weight, seed/pod, and plant height.

ANOVA over locations showed consistent significant variations were recorded within the checks for 100-seed weight, above ground biomass, seed yield, and rust disease score. These implied that yield increment was achieved for the last three decades, largely for 100-seed weight, above ground biomass, and seed yield of lentil genotypes. A consistent significant variation was also recorded within test genotypes over three locations for days to 50% flowering and 100-seed weight. Besides, reliable variation was noted over all locations between checks and test genotypes for above ground biomass and seed yield. Similarly, according to this (unpublished data) follow-up study, using the multivariate analysis reported that seed yield, above ground biomass, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight, rust severity score, and plant height were the major agromorphological traits contributing to variations among the genotypes.

Estimate of PCV and GVC for days to 50% flowering, days to 90% maturity, and 100-seed weight showed narrow differences, indicating a relatively low influence of the environment on these characters. Similar observation of considerable closeness between GCV and PCV for these characters made by [43] indicated low influence of environmental factors in lentil. In general, PCV values for most of the traits at Sirinka and Sinana were higher than that record noted at Chefe Donsa. In addition, the PCV was generally higher than the GCV for all characters. Consistently higher PCV values were observed across four environments for rust disease scores, seed yield, pod weight/plant, seed weight/plant, number of pods/plant, 100-seed weight, above ground plant biomass, and number of seeds/plant. Other studies showed similar high PCV and GCV for seed yield, above ground biomass, and 100-seed weight [44, 45]. In contrast, days to 50% flowering, days to 90% maturity, and plant height showed comparatively low PCV values (less than 20%) for all locations. It was observed that GCV for number of pods/plant, seed yield, rust disease score, 100-seed weight, number of seeds/plant, and biological yield/plant was high in both seasons. However, traits such as days to 50% flowering, days to 90% maturity, and plant height consistently showed lower GCV values of between 2.4% and 17%. The remaining traits lack consistency and showed low to moderate GCV for number of seeds/pods, seed weight/plant, and pod weight/plant. Similar significant and considerable variation for (phenotypic and genotypic) results was reported for biological yield/plant, seed yield/plant, and 100-seed weight by [15, 35, 43, 45–48]. However, as opposed to this finding, [49, 50] reported higher GCV and PCV for days to 50% flowering but they reported the same record for days to 90% maturity and plant height. Similarly, [35] reported the minimum PCV and GCV for days to maturity and number of seeds/pod.

According to [51], most characters have showed high heritability estimate over locations except at Chefe Donsa due to severe wilt incidence. Reference [52] reported comparable high heritability estimates for all traits except for plant height and biological yield on lentil. Reference [15] similarly recorded high heritability for 100-seed weight, days to 50% flowering, and days to 90% maturity. Reference [7] also reported high heritability for seed weight and days to 50% flowering. In line with our finding, [53] reported that those days to 50% flowering showed higher heritability estimates; however, they differed in reporting with higher genetic advance. 100-seed weight, rust severity score, and seed yield showed high heritability values coupled with high genetic advance values across locations because of high GCV. Numbers of seeds/plant, seed weight/plant, and number of seeds/pods have intermediate GCV and heritability with a mild response to selection. Similar to our findings, [45] reported higher degree of PCV, GCV, and genetic advance for seed yield/plant on lentil. However, in contrast to these reports, higher PCV, GCV, and genetic advance were recorded for biological yield/plant.

The GCV along with heritability estimates provide a reliable estimate of the amount of genetic advance expected through phenotypic selection [54]. Based on the underlying facts, four groups of traits were categorized as per the analysis: the first group included plant height, days to 50% flowering, and days to 90% maturity which have low GCV with a high heritability but they end up with low genetic advance. [42, 44] made a similar report that high heritability estimate for days to 50% flowering and days to 90% maturity with low genetic advance values on lentil. The second group of characters was above ground biomass, number of seeds/plant, and number of pods/plant with intermediate GCV, heritability, and genetic advance. However, deviated from our findings, studies by [42, 44, 45] reported high heritability and expected genetic gain estimate for above ground biomass and number of pods/plant.

The third group of characters, rust severity score, seed yield, and 100-seed weight, has higher GCV with high heritability coupled with high genetic advance as percentage of the mean. Reference [42, 44] reported high heritability estimate for seed yield and 100-seed weight coupled with higher genetic gain. High heritability for the characters indicated that these traits were less affected by environmental factors. This is indicative of the fact that these traits are mostly controlled by genetic factors and expected to respond to direct selection for traits improvement. The fourth group of characters, pod weight/plant, seed weight/plant, and number of seeds/pods, showed inconsistent GCV, heritability, and genetic advance values across locations. These findings indicated that measuring yield components in breeding program would be difficult. From our follow-up study by (unpublished data), the second and the third groups of characters responded more to selection and the most important traits that contributed to the genetic divergence of lentil. From our follow-up association study (unpublished data), these traits attributed a strong association with seed yield. Therefore, for selecting high yielding lentil genotypes, the breeder should give emphasis to higher seed weight/plant, more number of pods/plant, and plants with short to intermediate height. This observation is in accordance with [55, 56] selection based on number of pods/plant and seed weight/plant which were the most important characters that contributed to seed yield. However, days to 90% maturity, rust disease severity score, and days to 50% flowering which otherwise had a negative phenotype correlation with seed yield had substantially negative direct effect on seed yield (unpublished data).

5. Conclusion

This study has described a high phenotypic diversity for important agromorphological characteristics of landraces and exotic genotypes of Ethiopia gene pool. The incidence of highly significant variation between landraces and exotic line for the majority of traits considered is a sign of the presence of a high degree of genetic variation implying the great potential of the Ethiopian germplasm in future breeding programs through selection. As per the analysis, four groups of traits were categorized. Some promising landraces were identified with superior plant characteristics, such as early flowering and early maturing accessions, wide range of genetic base for plant height, number of seeds/plant, resistance to rust, and both low and high yielding lines. Seed yield, 100-seed weight in gram, rust disease score, and total number of seeds/plant consistently showed higher GCV, heritability, and genetic advance in the lentil genotypes. All these important agromorphological characteristic traits with their associated genotypes could be successfully utilized in breeding programs that are aimed at improving the yield and the yield components of lentil. The wide genetic base that is possessed by the Ethiopian germplasm would be integrated in a breeding program and used as a parent in a recombination breeding.

In conclusion, this study has demonstrated that the exotic accessions introduced from ICARDA have a rich genetic potential for 100-seed weight, number of seeds/plant, seed weight/plant, short stature, and resistant source for rust. The Ethiopian landraces were potentials for earliness, higher number of pods/plant, and long plant height. This study has showed a high phenotypic diversity of important plant characteristics of the Ethiopian lentil germplasm. However, additional search is needed to develop a specific plant idotype for major agroecological zone to provide as a platform for local adaptation and then breed for location relevant traits, such as a biotic stresses and identification source of resistance for other major important diseases.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors are most grateful for Gonder University, Haramaya University, Federal Ministry of Education, ICARDA Legume Research Program, ICARDA Ethiopia country office, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research Center, National Chickpea and Lentil Research Project in Debrezeit Agricultural Research Center, Sirinka Agricultural Research Center and Sinana Agricultural Research Center, and Institute Biodiversity Conservation, for research funding supports of this study.

References

D. Zohary, “The wild progenitor and the place of origin of the cultivated lentil:Lens culinaris,” Economic Botany, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 326–332, 1972.

H. Barulina, “Lentils of the USSR and other countries,” in Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Plant Breeding Supplement, pp. 265–304, USSR Institute of Plant Industry of the Lenin Academy of Agricultural Science Leningrad, USSR, 1930.

W. Erskine, “Global production, supply and demand,” in The Lentil: Botany, Production and Uses, F. J. William Erskine, Muehlbauer, A. Sarker, and B. Sharma, Eds., pp. 4–12, CABI, London, UK, 2009.

FAOSTAT, “Distribution of global lentil production among India, Canada and Turkey (the “big three” producers) and by continent,” FAOSTAT, 2009, http://faostat.fao.org/

G. Bejiga, S. Tsegaye, and A. Tullu, “Stability of seed yield for some varieties of lentil grown in the Ethiopian highlands,” Crop Research, vol. 9, pp. 337–343, 1995.

CSA, Central Statistical Agency Agricultural Sample Survey Report on: Area and Production of Crops, Statistical Bulletin, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2012.

G. Bejiga, S. Tsegaye, A. Tullu, and W. Erskine, “Quantitave evaluation of Ethiopian landraces of lentil (Lens culinaris),” Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 293–301, 1996.

F. Asnake and G. Bejiga, “Breeding lentil for wider adaptation,” in Forage and Food Legumes of Ethiopia: Progress and Prospects. Proceedings of the Workshop on Food and Forage Legumes, A. Kemal, K. Gemechu, A. Seid et al., Eds., pp. 80–86, EIAR and ICARDA. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Aleppo Syria, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, September 2003.

R. W. Allard, Principles of Plant Breeding, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1960.

W. Erskine, Y. Adham, and L. Holly, “Geographic distribution of variation in quantitative traits in a world lentil collection,” Euphytica, vol. 43, no. 1-2, pp. 97–103, 1989.

M. Ahmad, D. L. McNeil, and J. R. Sedcole, “Phylogenetic relationships in Lens species and their interspecific hybrids as measured by morphological characters,” Euphytica, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 101–111, 1997.

J. S. C. Smith and O. S. Smith, “The description and assessment of distance between inbred lines of maize. The use of morphological traits as descriptors,” Maydica, vol. 34, pp. 141–150, 1989.

K. Mather and J. L. Jinks, Biometrical Genetics: The Study of Continuous Variation, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 2nd edition, 1971.

H. W. Johnson, H. F. Robinson, and R. E. Comstock, “Estimate of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 47, pp. 314–318, 1955.

B. T. Bicer and D. Sakar, “Genetic variability and heritability for grain yield and other characters in lentil,” Journal Biological Science, vol. 4, pp. 216–218, 2004.

B. T. Bicer and D. Sakar, “Stability parameters in lentil,” Journal of Central European Agriculture, vol. 7, pp. 439–443, 2006.

W. Erskine, P. C. Williams, and H. Nakkoul, “Genetic and environmental variation in the seed size, protein, yield, and cooking quality of lentils,” Field Crops Research, vol. 12, pp. 153–161, 1985.

A. Tullu, I. Kusmenoglu, K. E. Mcphee, and F. J. Muehlbauer, “Characterization of core collection of lentil germplasm for phenology, morphology, seed and straw yields,” Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 143–151, 2001.

A. Sarker and W. Erskine, “Recent progress in the ancient lentil,” Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 19–29, 2006.

S. Roy, M. A. Islam, A. Sarker, M. A. Malek, M. Y. Rafii, and M. R. Ismail, “Determination of genetic diversity in lentil germplasm based on quantitative traits,” Australia Journal of Crop Science, vol. 7, pp. 14–21, 2013.

F. Edossa, T. Kassahun, and B. Endashaw, “A comparative study of morphological and molecular diversity in Ethiopian lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) landraces,” African Journal of Plant Science, vol. 4, pp. 242–254, 2010.

T. Seifu, Correlation and path coefficient analysis in lentil (Lens culinaries Medik.) and their implication for selection [M.S. thesis], Alemaya Agricultural University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 1988.

B. Geletu and A. Yadeta, “Genetic and breeding research in lentil,” in Cool-Season Food Legumes of Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 1st National Cool-Season Food Legumes Review Conference, December 1993, A. Telaye, G. Bejiga, M. C. Saxena, and M. Solh, Eds., pp. 6416–8420, Addis AbabaInstitute of Agricultural Research. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria, 1994.

D. Tigist, Genetic variability and associations among yield and yield related characters in exotic lentil lines (Lens culinaries Medik.) [M.S. thesis], Alemaya University, East Harerge, Ethiopia, 2003.

D. Ketema, Genetic Variation for Agronomic and Root Characters in Ethiopian Lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) Landraces Grown Under Moisture Stress [M.S. thesis], Haramaya University, East Harerge, Ethiopia, 2007.

W. Chen, Stemphylium Blight Disease Scoring in Field Condition, USDA-ARS, Washington State University, Pullman Wash, USA, 2007.

VSN International, GenStat for Windows, VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK, 13th edition, 2010.

W. T. Federer, “Augmented designs with one-way elimination of heterogeneity,” Biometrics, vol. 17, pp. 447–473, 1961.

C. S. Lin, M. R. Binns, and L. P. Lefkovitch, “Stability analysis: where do we stand?” Crop Science, vol. 26, pp. 894–900, 1986.

S. K. Yau and J. Hamblin, “Relative yield as a measure of entry performance in variable environments,” Crop Science, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 813–817, 1994.

VSN International , GenStat for Windows, VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK, 15th edition, 2012.

H. A. Al-Jibouri, P. A. Miller, and H. F. Miller, “Genotypic and environmental variances and co variances in an upland cross of inter specific origin,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 50, pp. 633–636, 1958.

S. N. Deshmukh and P. S. Reddy, “Genetic variability, character association and path coefficients of quantitative traits in Virginia bunch varieties of ground nut,” Indian Journal Agricultural Science, vol. 56, pp. 816–821, 1986.

S. C. Agrawal, M. N. Khare, and P. S. Agrawal, “Field screening of lentil lines for resistance to rust,” Indian Journal of Phytopathology, vol. 292, pp. 20–28, 1976.

M. Chakrabotry and M. F. Haque, “Genetic variability and component analysis in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.),” Journal Lentil Research, vol. 12, pp. 199–204, 2000.

B. T. Bicer and D. Sakar, “Studies on variability of lentil genotypes in Southeastern Anatolia of Turkey,” Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, vol. 36, pp. 20–24, 2008.

F. Toklu, B. Tuba Biçer, and T. Karaköy, “Agro-morphological characterization of the Turkish lentil landraces,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 8, no. 17, pp. 4121–4127, 2009.

T. Sultana, S. Nadeem, Z. Fatima, and A. Ghafoor, “Identification of elite pure-lines from local lentil germplasm using diversity index based on quantitative traits,” Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 2249–2256, 2010.

A. L. A. Al-Ghzawi, E. Bsoul, F. Aukour, Z. Al-Ajlouni, M. Al-Azzam, and M. M. Ajlouni, “Genetic variation for quantitative traits in Jordanian lentil landraces,” Advances in Environmental Biology, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 3676–3680, 2011.

K. B. Singh and S. Singh, “Evaluation of exotic germplasm in lentil,” Journal Agricultural Research, vol. 6, pp. 304–306, 1991.

M. Solh and W. Erskine, “Genetic resources of lentils,” in Genetic Resources and Their Exploitation Chickpeas, Faba Beans and Lentils, J. R. Witcombe and W. Erskine, Eds., pp. 205–217, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1984..

B. N. Baidya, A. M. Eunus, and S. Sen, “Estimation of variability and correlation in yield and yield contributing characters in lentil (Lens culinaris),” Environmental Ecology, vol. 6, pp. 694–697, 1988.

A. S. Rathi, J. S. Sindhu, and V. S. Singh, “Variability, heritability and genetic advance in lentil,” Legume Research, vol. 25, pp. 113–116, 2002.

O. Vir, V. P. Gupta, and O. Vir, “Variation in Macrosperma x microsperma derived gene pool of lentil under low and high fertility levels of soil at sub-tropical climate of Himalayas,” Indian Journal Agricultural Research, vol. 32, pp. 181–184, 1998.

N. Kishore and V. P. Gupta, “Early generation selection in microsperma and macrosperma derived gene pool of lentil,” Indian Journal Genetics and Plant Breeding, vol. 62, pp. 34–37, 2002.

N. I. Haddad, T. P. Bogyo, and F. J. Muehlbauer, “Genetic variance of six agronomic characters in three lentil (Lens culinarisMedic) crosses,” Euphytica, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 113–120, 1982.

M. Singh, A. Sarker, and W. Erskine, “Estimation of heritability using spatial variability models: the case of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.),” Indian Journal Genetics and Plant Breeding, vol. 65, pp. 77–83, 2005.

S. D. Tyagi and M. H. Khan, “Correlation, path-coefficient and genetic diversity in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) under rainfed conditions,” International Research Journal of Plant Science, vol. 2, pp. 191–200, 2011.

S. Ayaz, B. A. McKenzie, G. D. Hill, and D. L. McNeil, “Variability in yield of four grain legume species in a subhumid temperate environment. II. Yield components,” Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 2004.

G. Singh, I. S. Singh, and R. Kumar, “Genetic variability for seed yield and its component characters in a macrosperma × microsperma cross of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.),” Crop Improvement, vol. 31, pp. 206–209, 2004.

H. F. Robinson, R. E. Comstock, and P. H. Harvey, “Genetic and phenotypic correlation in corn and their implications in selection,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 43, pp. 283–287, 1954.

S. K. Jain, S. K. Madaria, S. K. Rao, and P. K. Nigam, “Analysis of yield factors in lentil,” Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 29, pp. 173–180, 1995.

M. Singh, D. K. Maheshwari, R. K. Mittal, S. K. Sharma, and M. Singh, “Genetic variability and correlation of grain yield and other quantitative characters in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik),” Annals Agricultural Biological Research, vol. 4, pp. 121–124, 1999.

G. W. Burton and E. H. DeVane, “Estimation heritability in Tall Festuca (Festuca arundinacea) from replicated clonal material,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 45, pp. 478–481, 1953.

S. A. M. Khattab, “Association and Path analysis in lentil under different irrigation regimes,” Egypt Journal Agronomy, vol. 20, pp. 13–25, 1999.

S. Sarvjeet, I. Singh, R. K. Gill, L. Kaur, and A. Sarker, “Evaluation of exotic lentil germplasm and studies on genetic parameters for various traits,” Journal of Lentil Research, vol. 3, pp. 22–27, 2006.