In this study, a formulation has been proposed to calculate the pressure on wall and determine the angle of failure wedge based on limit equilibrium method. The mentioned formulation is capable of calculating active pressure coefficient, culmination of forces in failure surface, and pressure distribution on wall with the effect of line surcharge. In addition, based on the proposed method, a simple formula has been proposed to calculate the angle of failure wedge by the effect of surcharge. Moreover, the proposed approach has the advantage of taking into account the effect of surcharge on elastoplastic environment by considering the parameters of soil and determining the extent to which the surcharge is effective in pressure distribution on the wall. However, in most previous methods and specifications, resultant lateral pressure from surcharge in elastic environment had been considered. Finally, based on the obtained results, the design diagrams for different soils and different surcharges have been proposed. According to these diagrams, pressure on wall, pressure distribution on wall, and angle of failure wedge will easily be achieved. Also, a computer program has been written in MATLAB software environment. Using the results of these codes, the pressure on wall with the effect of surcharge, the angle of failure wedge, and pressure distribution on wall will be determined.

1. Introduction

The calculation of active soil pressure on retaining walls is of fundamental issues in foundation engineering. It is typically examined using the theory proposed by Coulomb  or Rankine theory . On the other hand, active pressure is influenced by external loads affecting the soil behind the wall. In order to calculate the resultant lateral pressure on retaining walls caused by surcharge, Boussinesq method  is usually used that assumes a homogeneous and elastic behavior for soil. On the other hand, referring to the difference between the results of elastic methods by Boussinesq , Das  proposed equations with the assumption of elastic behavior to calculate the surcharge with actual values.

Gerber  and Spangler  examined the effect of surcharge on lateral pressure on retaining wall caused by a concentrated load using large-scale tests. The principles of the theory of elasticity to study the effects of line surcharge were initially used by Misra  and for strip surcharge by Jarquio . In addition, Motta  offered a method for extensive uniform surcharges using developed Coulomb formulation and calculated active pressure on wall with the effect of surcharge according to the angle of failure wedge.

Seismic stability of retaining walls due to the effect of surcharge was studied by Caltabino et al. . The researchers considered the effect of earthquake as quasi-static based on the method presented by Okabe  and Mononobe and Matsuo .

Using experimental results, Georgiadis and Anagnostopoulos  compared the result of pressure on shields under surcharge with those of different methods, including elastic stress distribution, and approximation of 45-degree slope, as well as the results of Coulomb method. As a result, elastic approach has a significant difference with real values. Kim and Barker  studied the impact of live surcharge caused by traffic load on retaining walls. The researchers proposed an analytical approach to calculate horizontal active pressure on retaining wall using equivalent bending moment method.

Using the theory of Coulomb, Greco  investigated the effect of strip surcharge on active pressure on nonreinforced retaining walls and presented an analytical method for the calculation of pressure and the resultant effect point. AASHTO  and US Army Crops  specifications proposed an analytical method for calculating resultant lateral earth pressure caused by surcharge according to the type of surcharge incurred on the wall. Cheng  presented lateral pressure coefficient in seismic state for cohesive-friction soils and q surcharges.

Basha and Basudhar  examined the stability of reinforced soil structures under seismic conditions using limit equilibrium method and assuming logarithmic spiral wedge failure. The researchers imposed seismic acceleration on reinforced soil structures using quasi-static method.

Ghanbari and Taheri  calculated the pressure on wall and reinforced force with the effect of surcharge on reinforced soil walls, under the assumption of Ahmadabadi and Ghanbari . The results for changes in the angle of failure wedge with the size of the surcharge suggest that increasing the amount of surcharge will result in an increase in the angle of failure wedge; however, by changing the distance of the surcharge from the wall, the angle of failure wedge does not change any more. The results of their research indicate that with increasing the distance of surcharge from the wall, the lateral pressure of soil will be reduced and when it is out of the angle of failure wedge, it has no effect on active earth pressure.

In this paper, a simple solution has been presented to calculate active pressure on wall with effect of line surcharge using limit equilibrium method. In the previously proposed methods, either the effect of friction angle between soil and wall was neglected or complex and lengthy solutions were required. The primary objective of the research was to develop a simple method based on limit equilibrium that can calculate the angle of failure wedge and force distribution on wall with the effect of surcharge. Then the effect of angle of internal friction angle, the amount of line surcharge, the distance of line surcharge from the wall, and the angle of internal friction of soil will be discussed.

2. Formulation for the Calculation of Pressure on Retaining Walls with the Effect of Line Surcharge

According to Figure 1, a retaining wall where δ is the angle of internal friction between soil and wall will be considered. If the hypothetical angle of failure wedge forms the angle β with the horizon, according to Figure 2, the angle which calculates the greatest amount of pressure on the wall with the line surcharge can be shown with β3 and without the surcharge, it can be shown with β1. To achieve the desired formulation, the following assumptions can be considered:

The failure surface is considered as a page.

The analysis is based on the limit equilibrium method.

The failure surface passes from the wall.

The soil mass is considered homogeneous.

The behavioral model intended for cohesive soil is elastoplastic model of Coulomb.

According to Figure 1, with the line surcharge, equilibrium equations for a hypothetical failure wedge can be written as follows:(1)Fxi=0Picosδ+Fisinφcosβi-Ficosφsinβi=0,Fyi=0Ficosφcosβi+Fisinφsinβi+Pisinδ-Wi-q=0,Moi=0-PiH3cosδ-WiH3tanβi+Fi·xFicosφ-q·x=0.By solving the three equations for each experimental wedge, Pi, Fi, and xF for the ith failure wedge (βi) are obtained. Now, in the proposed formulation in order to determine the angle of failure wedge, the amount of active pressure on wall is calculated for different angles of failure wedge; then the angle that gives maximum active pressure is recorded as the angle of failure wedge, where Pa is the active soil pressure without surcharge with β1, Pas is the active soil pressure with the effect of line surcharge with β3, and Paq is the added pressure on wall under line surcharge.(2)Pas=Pa+Paq.Given the distance of surcharge from the wall, in order to calculate the pressure on wall (Pi), three modes are considered.

The equilibrium of forces in the ith failure wedge.

The distance of line surcharge from the wall in three different modes.

First Mode. If the distance of line surcharge from the wall is less than xH/tanβ3, then the active pressure on wall is obtained according to (2).(3)xHtanβ3P=Pas=Pasurcharge.

Second Mode. If the distance of line surcharge equals the amount of H/tanβ3xH/tanβ1, then by substituting the angle β2 in (1), the amount of pressure on the wall can be obtained according to (4)β2=ArctanHx,(5)Htanβ3xHtanβ1P=Pβ2Pa.

Third. If the distance of the line surcharge is greater than H/tanβ1, it states that the line surcharge on the wall has no effect and to calculate the pressure on wall, the amount of surcharge in (1) can be considered zero and present it as (6).(6)Htanβ1xP=Pa.Now three types of active earth pressure coefficient can be defined as follows:(7)Ka=Pa1/2γH2,Kas=Pas1/2γH2,Kaq=Paq1/2γH2.

3. The Evaluation of the Results of the Proposed Method with the Effect of Line Surcharge

The proposed formulation has the ability to calculate the active pressure on wall, angle of failure wedge, and pressure distribution on wall for a variety of soil features. For this purpose, a sample retaining wall is intended whose features can be seen in Table 1. In addition, the results of analyses carried out on the wall are discussed.

The features of the sample wall in the analyses with the effect of line surcharge.

 Wall height (H, m) 10 m Linear surcharge (q, kN/m) 0–500 kN/m Soil density (γ, kN/m3) 20  kN/m3 Friction angle between wall and backfill soil (δ, degrees) 0°–ϕ° Internal angle of soil friction (φ, degrees) 20°–40° Distance of surcharge from the wall (x, m) 0–20 m

First, for one retaining wall, active pressure coefficient changes against the change in the angle of internal friction angle are examined by comparing different amounts of line surcharge. In order to provide dimensionless design diagram, active pressure coefficient (Kas) is used. As Figure 3 shows, an increase in the angle of soil internal friction of the soil reduces the coefficient of Kas nonlinearly. Also, an increase in the line surcharge increases the active soil pressure and ultimately increases Kas coefficient.

Changes in active pressure coefficient (Kas) against changes in the angle of internal soil friction for different amounts of line surcharge.

According to Figure 4, increasing the friction angle between soil and wall reduces the coefficient of Kas nonlinearly. This trend changes in ϕ larger than 35° and δ larger than 2ϕ/3.

Changes in active pressure coefficient (Kas) against changes in the angle of internal soil friction for different amounts of friction angle between soil and wall.

In Figures 5 and 6, active pressure coefficient (Kas) is plotted against the change in distance of discharge from the wall. With increasing the distance of surcharge from the wall, the pressure on wall is reduced. In Figure 5, the changes for surcharge 100 kN/m and in Figure 6 the changes for surcharge 200 kN/m are drawn. These changes always start from a maximum and end at a minimum level. For example, in ϕ=20, active pressure coefficient is always fluctuating between 0.43 and 0.49. By an increase in the angle of internal friction of soil, the maximum distance of surcharge is reduced. For example, in ϕ=20, maximum distance of surcharge reduces to 7 meters and in ϕ=40, this amount is reduced to 4 meters.

Changes in active pressure coefficient (Kas) against changes in the distance of surcharge from wall for different amounts of the angle of internal soil friction.

Changes in active pressure coefficient (Kas) against changes in the distance of surcharge from wall for different amounts of internal soil friction.

In Figure 7, active pressure coefficient (Kas) is plotted against changes in the angle of internal friction. These diagrams indicate the surface where active pressure coefficient changes according to the distance of the surcharge. The lower limit in each diagram states the minimum active pressure coefficient in the minimum distance of surcharge; however, the upper limit shows the maximum coefficient of active earth pressure on the wall in the maximum distance of surcharge. The diagrams are plotted for four values of line surcharge and for other values, interpolation can be used.

The changes of active pressure coefficient (Kas) against changes in the angle of internal friction for the distance of surcharge from the wall.

4. Determination of the Angle of Failure Wedge with the Effect of Line Surcharge

The angle that gives maximum active pressure is recorded as the angle of failure wedge. In Figure 8 changes in the angle of failure wedge against changes in the angle of internal friction of soil are plotted. Increased line surcharge and internal friction angle increase the angle of the failure wedge. To calculate the angle of failure wedge, the following proposed formulas can be used:(8)ifq=0kNm2β=0.6φ+38,ifq=100kNm2β=0.54φ+43.2,ifq=200kNm2β=0.44φ+50.In general, this equation can be used to calculate the angle of failure wedge.(9)β=-qφ7π+108φπ+q5π+12π

Changes in the angle of failure wedge against changes in internal friction angle of soil for different values of line surcharge.

5. Distribution of Stress to the Walls with the Effect of Line Surcharge

In Figures 9 and 10, stress distribution is plotted for different values of the angle of internal friction. In Figure 9, total stress distribution, which includes earth pressure and the effect of surcharge, is drawn. By calculating the area under the diagram, the total pressure on wall (Pas) can be obtained. In Figure 10, lateral pressure distribution from the surcharge is plotted. By calculating the area under the diagram, the pressure from the surcharge (Paq) can be obtained. Increased internal friction angle always reduces the stress distribution.

Total active pressure distribution on the wall for different values of the angle of internal friction.

Resultant lateral earth pressure from the surcharge for different values of the angle of internal friction.

In Figures 1113, stress distribution with changes in line surcharge is plotted. In Figures 11 and 12, the total pressure distribution for two values of ϕ=30 and ϕ=40 is drawn. In Figure 13, resultant lateral pressure distribution from the surcharge for different values of 0 kN/m to 200 kN/m is plotted. Increased line surcharge increases total stress distribution and resultant lateral pressure distribution from the surcharge.

The total active pressure distribution on the wall for different values of line surcharge for ϕ=30.

The total active pressure distribution on the wall for different values of line surcharge for ϕ=40.

Resultant lateral earth pressure distribution for different values of line surcharge.

6. Comparison of the Results of the Proposed Method with the Results of Other Studies and Specifications

In Table 2, the results of the proposed method for retaining wall with the effect of line surcharge have been compared with the results of Ghanbari and Taheri  and Motta  on equal terms. Results are intended in three modes of surcharge, that is, 20, 50, and 100 (kN/m), and for two internal friction angles. Also in Table 3, the results of the proposed method have been evaluated with different specifications. In the specifications, soil parameters have not been considered and have been studied in an elastic mode; however, in the proposed method, soil parameters such as internal friction angle and the angle of friction between soil and wall have been taken into account. In Figure 14, resultant lateral pressure distribution from the surcharge has been plotted for the proposed approach, Das  elastic method, and AASHTO  specification. The stress distribution has been obtained with the assumption of an elastoplastic behavior and is somewhat different from stress distribution on Das  method and AASHTO  specification where the assumption of elastic behavior is used.

Comparison of the results of the proposed method with Ghanbari and Taheri  and Motta .

x = 4  m, H=10 m, δ=10°, γ=20 kN/m3
ϕ = 20 ° ϕ = 30 °
Proposed method Ghanbari and Taheri Motta Proposed method Ghanbari and Taheri Motta
   
q = 20  (kN/m)
Pas 457.96 457.5 463.5 318.34 315.08 318.9
β 52 51.9 51.4 59 57.2 57.3

q = 50  (kN/m)
Pas 475.44 472.4 488.9 333.80 321.7 334.9
β 53 53.3 52.1 60 59.7 58.1

q = 100  (kN/m)
Pas 506.50 491.4 531.5 361.04 334.7 361.6
β 56 55.7 52.9 62 61.6 59

Comparison of the results of the proposed method with Ghanbari and Taheri  and specifications (1994).

x=4 m, H=10 m, γ=  20 kN/m3
Paq
Proposed method Ghanbari and Taheri  Beton Kalendar  USACE  AASHTO 
ϕ = 20 ϕ = 40 ϕ = 20 ϕ = 30
δ = 0 δ = ϕ / 3 δ = ϕ δ = 0 δ = ϕ / 3 δ = ϕ
q = 50  (kN/m) 55.9 49.79 42.2 26.8 24.4 24.1 24.67 12.72 22.62 36.07 26.78
q = 100  (kN/m) 111.8 99.58 84.5 53.6 48.8 48.2 43.08 23.05 45.31 54.76 54

Resultant lateral earth pressure from the surcharge for the proposed method and AASHTO  and Das .

7. Conclusions

Based on the studies presented in this study, the following results can be extracted:

For the retaining wall with the effect of line surcharge, a formulation has been proposed which contains 3n equations and 3n variables and using it, the coefficient of active pressure, angle of failure wedge, and the effect of the resultant forces at the failure surface with the effect of surcharge are obtained. The proposed method has also the advantage of plotting the pressure on wall and resultant lateral pressure distribution with the effect of line surcharge. Finally, three types of active earth pressure coefficient, Kas and Kaq and Ka, can be defined.

The results of the proposed method for retaining wall with the effect of line surcharge have been compared with the results of Ghanbari and Taheri  and Motta , and AASHTO , USACE , and Beton Kalendar  specifications. The stress distribution has been obtained with the assumption of an elastoplastic behavior and is somewhat different from stress distribution on Das  method and AASHTO  specification where the assumption of elastic behavior is used.

The proposed method is able to calculate the angle of the failure wedge with the effect of line surcharge. In addition, a formula has been proposed for calculating the angle of failure wedge with the effect of line surcharge. The conclusion was drawn that increased internal friction angle and line surcharge will result in the angle of failure wedge.

In the research presented, a series of graphs has been applied according to which active pressure coefficient with the effect of line surcharge can be calculated without any analysis and can be used in implementations. These diagrams are dimensionless and using them, the areas where the surcharge is effective in the pressure distribution on wall can be determined.

These diagrams indicate the surface where active pressure coefficient changes according to the distance of the surcharge. The lower limit in each diagram states the minimum active pressure coefficient in the maximum distance of surcharge; however, the upper limit shows the maximum coefficient of active earth pressure on the wall in the maximum distance of surcharge. The diagrams are plotted for four values of line surcharge and for other values, interpolation can be used.

In this study, the effect of soil properties and surcharge on the amount of active pressure coefficient has been investigated and the conclusion was that increasing the angle of internal friction and the angle of friction between soil and wall and the distance of the surcharge from the wall will reduce the coefficient of active pressure; however, with increasing the line surcharge, the value of the coefficient of active pressure will increase. Moreover, increasing the angle of internal friction will reduce the stress distribution and resultant stress pressure on wall with the effect of line surcharge where the effect of line surcharge is reversed in the process.

Nomenclature x :

Distance of surcharge from the wall (m)

x F i :

The distance of F from m

F i :

The resultant lateral force in failure surface

H :

Height of wall (m)

K a :

Active earth pressure coefficient without surcharge (dimensionless)

K a q :

Coefficient of active pressure from the surcharge (dimensionless)

K a s :

Active earth pressure coefficient with the effect of surcharge (dimensionless)

P a :

Active earth pressure without surcharge (kN/m)

P a q :

Resultant lateral earth pressure from the surcharge (kN/m)

P a s = P a s u r c h a r g e :

Active earth pressure with the effect of surcharge (kN/m)

P i :

Active pressure on wall in the ith wedge

q :

Linear surcharge (kN/m)

W i :

Weight of ith slice (kN).

Greek Letters β :

Angle of failure wedge (°)

β 1 :

Angle of failure wedge without surcharge (°)

β 2 :

Angle of failure wedge on the location of the effect of surcharge (°)

β 3 :

Angle of failure wedge with the effect of surcharge (°)

β i :

Angle of failure wedge in the ith experimental wedge (°)

γ :

Total unit weight (kN/m3)

δ :

Friction angle between wall and backfill soil (°)

ϕ :

Angle of internal friction of soil (°).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Coulomb C. A. Essai sur une application des règles de maximis et minimis a quelques Problèmes de statique relatifs a l' architeture 1773 Mémoires de savants étrangers de l' Académie des Sciences de Paris Rankine W. J. M. On the mathematical theory of the stability of earthwork and masonry Proceedings of Royal Society 1857 8 69 87 Boussinesq J. V. Application des Potentiels â L'Etude de L'Équilibre et du Mouvement des Solides Élastiques 1885 Paris, France Gauthier-Villars Das B. M. Principles of Soil Dynamics 1992 Boston, Mass, USA PWS-Kent Gerber E. Untersuchungen uber die Druckverteilung im orlich belasteten sand 1929 Zürich, Switzerland Technische Hochscule Spangler M. G. Horizental pressure on retaining walls due to concentrated surface loads Iowa State University Engineering Experiment Station, Bulletin, no 140, 1938 Misra B. Lateral pressures on retaining walls due to loads on surface of granular backfill Soils and Foundations 1980 20 2 31 44 10.3208/sandf1972.20.2_31 2-s2.0-0019026925 Jarquio R. Total lateral surcharge pressure due to strip load Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division. ASCE 1981 107 10 1424 1428 Motta E. Generalized coulomb active-earth pressure for distanced surcharge Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1994 120 6 1072 1079 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:6(1072) 2-s2.0-0028669370 Caltabino S. Cascone E. Maugeri M. Seismic Stability of Retaining Walls with Surcharge 2000 Catania, Italy Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Catania Okabe S. General theory of earth pressures Journal of the Japan Society of Civil Engineering 1926 12 1 Mononobe N. Matsuo H. On the determination of earth pressure during earthquakes 9 Proceeding of the World Engineering Congress 1929 Tokyo, Japan 179 187 Georgiadis M. Anagnostopoulos C. Lateral pressure on sheet pile walls due to strip load Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 1998 124 1 95 98 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:1(95) 2-s2.0-0031892338 Kim J. S. Barker R. M. Effect of live load surcharge on retaining walls and abutments Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2002 128 10 803 813 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:10(803) 2-s2.0-0036795470 Greco V. R. Active earth thrust on cantilever walls in general conditions Soils and Foundations 1999 39 6 65 78 10.3208/sandf.39.6_65 2-s2.0-0004017897 Greco V. R. Pseudo-static analysis for earth thrust computations Soils and Foundations 2003 43 2 135 138 10.3208/sandf.43.2_135 2-s2.0-24744444971 Greco V. R. Active earth thrust by backfills subject to a line surchange Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2005 42 5 1255 1263 10.1139/t05-038 2-s2.0-32344433192 Greco V. R. Lateral earth pressure due to backfill subject to a strip of surcharge Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 2006 24 3 615 636 10.1007/s10706-005-2009-x 2-s2.0-33745594304 AASHTO Interims: Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges 2007 Washington, DC, USA American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials USACE Stability Analysis of Concrete Structures USACE. EM 1110-2-2100, 2005 Cheng Y. M. Seismic lateral earth pressure coefficients for C-φ soils by slip line method Computers and Geotechnics 2003 30 8 661 670 10.1016/j.compgeo.2003.07.003 2-s2.0-0242551830 Basha B. M. Basudhar P. K. Pseudo static seismic stability analysis of reinforced soil structures Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 2010 28 6 745 760 10.1007/s10706-010-9336-2 2-s2.0-78049322164 Ghanbari A. Taheri M. An analytical method for calculating active earth pressure in reinforced retaining walls subject to a line surcharge Geotextiles and Geomembranes 2012 34 1 10 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.02.009 2-s2.0-84857470819 Ahmadabadi M. Ghanbari A. New procedure for active earth pressure calculation in retaining walls with reinforced cohesive-frictional backfill Geotextiles and Geomembranes 2009 27 6 456 463 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.06.004 2-s2.0-70449115736 Beton Kalendar 2002 Munich, Germany Verlag von Wihelm Ernest and Sohn