Advances in High Energy Physics

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 491252, 5 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/491252

Research Article

Sensitivity on the Dipole Moments of the -Neutrino at Colliders: ILC and CLIC

A. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez

Facultad de Física, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Apartado Postal C-580, 98060 Zacatecas, ZAC, Mexico

Received 7 October 2013; Accepted 3 January 2014; Published 26 February 2014

Academic Editor: P. Bussey

Copyright © 2014 A. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP³.

Abstract.

We study the sensitivity on the anomalous magnetic and electric dipole moments of the -neutrino at a high-energy and high-luminosity linear electron positron collider, such as the ILC or CLIC, through the reaction . We obtain limits on the dipole moments at the future linear colliders energies. For integrated luminosities of 500 fb⁻¹ and center of mass energies between 0.5 and 3 TeV, the future colliders may improve the existing limits by two or three orders of magnitude.

1. Introduction

In the standard model (SM) [1–3] extended to contain right-handed neutrinos, the neutrino magnetic moment induced by radiative corrections is unobservably small, [4]. Current limits on these magnetic moments are several orders of magnitude larger, so that a magnetic moment close to these limits would indicate a window for probing effects induced by new physics beyond the SM [5]. Similarly, a neutrino electric dipole moment will also point to new physics and will be of relevance in astrophysics and cosmology, as well as terrestrial neutrino experiments [6]. Some bounds on the neutrino magnetic moment are shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Bounds on the neutrino magnetic moment.

Laboratory experiment TEXONO [14]

Cooling rates of white dwarfs [15]

Cooling rates of red giants [16]

Supernova energy loss [17]

Absence of high-energy events in the SN1987A neutrino signal [18]

Standard model (Dirac mass) [4]

Gould and Rothstein [7] reported in 1994 a bound on obtained through the analysis of the process , near the -resonance, with a massive neutrino and the SM and couplings.

At higher , near the pole , the dominant contribution involves the exchange of a boson. The dependence on the magnetic moment and the electric dipole moment comes from the radiation of the photon observed by the neutrino or antineutrino in the final state. However, in order to improve the limits on the magnetic moment and the electric dipole moment of the tau-neutrino, in our calculation of the process we consider the contribution that involves the exchange of a virtual photon. In this case, the dependence on the magnetic moment comes from a direct coupling to the virtual photon, and the observed photon is a result of initial-state Bremsstrahlung. The Feynman diagrams which give the most important contribution to the cross section are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: The Feynman diagrams contributing to the process (1, 2) when the vector boson is produced on mass-shell and (3, 4) contributions from anomalous neutrino electromagnetic couplings with initial-state radiation.

Our aim in the present paper is to analyze the reaction in the framework of the standard model minimally extended to include massive Dirac neutrinos and we attribute an anomalous magnetic moment (MM) and an electric dipole moment (EDM) to a massive tau-neutrino. This process sets limits on the tau-neutrino MM and EDM. In this paper, we take advantage of this fact to set limits on and for integrated luminosities of and center of mass energies between 0.5 and 3 TeV, that is to say, in the next generation of linear colliders, namely, the International Linear Collider (ILC) [8] and the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) [9].

The L3 Collaboration [10] evaluated the selection efficiency using detector-simulated events, random trigger events, and large-angle events. From Figure 1 of [10] the process with emitted in the initial state is the sole background in the angular range (white histogram). From the same figure in this angular interval, that is, , we see that only 6 events were found; this is the real background, not 14 events. In this case a simple method [11–13] is that at 1 level (68% C.L.) for a null signal the number of observed events should not exceed the fluctuation of the estimated background events: . Of course, this method is good only when is sufficiently large (i.e., when the Poisson distribution can be approximated with a gaussian [11–13]) but for it is a good approximation. This means that at , and level (68%, 90%, and 95% C.L.) the limits on the nonstandard parameters are found replacing the equation for the total number of events expected in the expression . The distributions of the photon energy and the cosine of its polar angle are consistent with SM predictions.

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we present the calculation of the process in the context of the standard model minimally extended to include massive Dirac neutrinos. Finally, we present our results and conclusions in Section 3.

2. The Total Cross Section

In this section we calculate the total cross section for the reaction . The respective transition amplitudes are thus given by

where

is the neutrino electromagnetic vertex, is the charge of the electron, is the photon momentum, and are the electromagnetic form factors of the neutrino, corresponding to charge radius, MM, and EDM, respectively, at [19, 20], while is the polarization vector of the photon. and stand for the momentum of the virtual neutrino (electron) and antineutrino (positron), respectively.

The MM and EDM give a contribution to the total cross section for the process of the following form:

where and , are the energy and the opening angle of the emitted photon.

The expression given for the first term of (3) corresponds to the cross section previously reported by Gould and Rothstein [7], while the second term comes from the contribution that involves the exchange of a virtual photon and the observed photon is radiated to the initial electron or positron.

3. Results and Conclusions

In order to evaluate the integral of the total cross section as a function of the parameters of the model, that is to say, and , we require cuts on the photon angle and energy to avoid divergences when the integral is evaluated at the important intervals of each experiment. We integrate over from to and from 15  to 100 . Using the following numerical values: , , and , we obtain the cross section .

As was discussed in [7, 10, 21, 22], , where is the total number of events expected at , and level as is mentioned in the introduction and according to the data reported by the ILC and CLIC [8, 9]. Taking this into consideration, we can obtain a limit for the tau-neutrino magnetic moment with .

The bounds obtained on the magnetic moment and electric dipole moment for and at , , and are shown in Table 2. We observed that the results obtained in Table 2 are better than those reported in the literature [7, 10, 19, 23–39].

Table 2: Bounds on the magnetic moment and electric dipole moment for = 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3 TeV and  fb⁻¹ at , , and .

= 0.5, 1, 1.5, 3 TeV  fb⁻¹

C. L.

, (7.03, 4.60, 2.25) × 
(2.86, 1.35) × , (8.88, 4.35) × 

, (7.99, 5.22, 2.56) × 
(3.25, 1.54, 1.00) × ,

, (8.84, 5.78, 2.83) × 
(3.60, 1.70, 1.11) × ,

The previous analysis and comments can readily be translated to the EDM of the -neutrino with . The resulting limits for the EDM as a function of the center of mass energy are shown in Table 2.

In order to see the sensitivity of the photon energy and the magnetic moment to new physics, in Figure 2 we plot the differential cross section versus   for the limits of the magnetic moment given in Table 2. We see that the differential cross section strongly depends on both the photon energy and the magnetic moment .

Figure 2: The differential cross section for as a function of and .

Figure 3 shows the total cross section for as a function of the center of mass energy and different values representative of the magnetic moment, which are reported in the literature, that is to say, (Table 2). Starting from a center of mass energy just greater than the mass, a minimum around occurs due to the SM -boson resonance tail on the high energies. For different values of the parameter the shape of the curves does not change and there is only a shift of these depending on the value of the magnetic moment. Finally, in Figure 4 we present the dependence of the sensitivity limits of the magnetic moment with respect to the collider luminosity for three different values of the center of mass energy, .

Figure 3: The curves show the shape for as a function of center of mass energy and different values of the magnetic moment.

Figure 4: Dependence of the sensitivity limits at C.L. for the anomalous magnetic moment for three different values of the center of mass energy in the process .

In conclusion, we have found that the process in the context of the standard model minimally extended to include massive Dirac neutrino at the high energies and luminosities expected at the ILC/CLIC colliders can be used to probe for bounds on the magnetic moment and electric dipole moment . In particular, we can appreciate that the 95% C.L. sensitivity limits expected for the magnetic moment at 0.5–1.5 TeV center of mass energies already can provide proof of these bounds of order 10⁻⁸–10⁻⁹, that is to say, 2-3 orders of magnitude better than those reported in the literature: (90% C.L.) from a sample of annihilation events collected with the L3 detector at the resonance corresponding to an integrated luminosity of [10]; (95% C.L.) at from measurements of the invisible width at LEP [19]; in the effective Lagrangian approach at the pole [36]; (90% C.L.) from the analysis of at the -pole, in a class of inspired models with a light additional neutral vector boson [37]; from the order of   Akama et al. derive and apply model-independent limits on the anomalous magnetic moments and the electric dipole moments of leptons and quarks due to new physics [38]. However, the limits obtained in [38] are for the tau-neutrino with an upper bound of which is the current experimental limit. It was pointed out in [38], however, that the upper limit on the mass of the electron neutrino and data from various neutrino oscillation experiments together imply that none of the active neutrino mass eigenstates is heavier than approximately . In this case, the limits given in [38] are improved by seven orders of magnitude. The limit (90% C.L.) is obtained at from a beam-dump experiment with assumptions on the production cross section and its branching ratio into [39], thus severely restricting the cosmological annihilation scenario [40]. Our results in Table 2 compare favorably with the limits obtained by the L3 Collaboration [10], and with other limits reported in the literature [7, 10, 19, 23–39].

In the case of the electric dipole moment the 95% C.L. sensitivity limits at 0.5–1.5 TeV center of mass energies and integrated luminosities of can provide proof of these bounds of order 10⁻¹⁹–10⁻²⁰, that is to say, are improved by 2-3 orders of magnitude than those reported in the literature: , 95% C.L. [19] and [38].

Finally, it seems that in order to improve these limits it might be necessary to study direct CP-violating effects [41]. In addition, the analytical and numerical results for the cross section could be of relevance for the scientific community.

Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges support from CONACyT, SNI, PROMEP, and PIFI (Mexico).

References

S. L. Glashow, “Partial-symmetries of weak interactions,” Nuclear Physics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 579–588, 1961.

S. Weinberg, “A model of leptons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 19, no. 21, pp. 1264–1266, 1967.

A. Salam, “Weak and electromagnetic interactions,” in Elementary Particle Theory, N. Svartholm, Ed., p. 367, Almquist and Wiskell, Stockholm, Sweden, 1968.

R. N. Mohapatra and P. B. Pal, Massive Neutrinos in Physics and Astrophysics, vol. 41 of Lecture Notes in Physics, World Scientific, Singapore, 1991.

M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Physics of Neutrinos: And Applications to Astrophysics, Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2003.

A. Cisneros, “Effect of neutrino magnetic moment on solar neutrino observations,” Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 87–92, 1971.

T. M. Gould and I. Z. Rothstein, “Bounding the tau neutrino magnetic moment from single photon searches at LEP,” Physics Letters B, vol. 333, no. 3-4, pp. 545–547, 1994.

T. Abe, et al., “Linear collider physics resource book for snowmass 2001—part 3: studies of exotic and standard model physics,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0106057

E. Accomando, A. Aranda, E. Ateser, et al., “Physics at the CLIC Multi-TeV linear collider,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0412251v1

M. Acciarri, O. Adriani, M. Aguilar-Benitez, et al., “Search for new physics in energetic single photon production in e⁺e⁻ annihilation at the Z resonance,” Physics Letters B, vol. 412, no. 1-2, pp. 201–209, 1997.

K. Nakamura, et al., “Review of particle physics,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 37, no. 7A, Article ID 075021, 2010.

R. S. Gupta and J. D. Wells, “Higgs boson search significance deformations due to mixed-in scalars,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.0824

G. L. Bayatian, S. Chatrchyan, G. Hmayakyan, et al., “CMS physics technical design report, volume II: physics performance,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 34, no. 9, p. 995, 2007.

M. Deniz, S. T. Lin, V. Singh, et al., “Measurement of -electron scattering cross section with a CsI(Tl) scintillating crystal array at the Kuo-Sheng nuclear power reactor,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 7, Article ID 072001, 17 pages, 2010.

S. I. Blinnikov and N. V. Dunina-Barkovskaya, “The cooling of hot white dwarfs: a theory with non-standard weak interactions and a comparison with observations,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 266, pp. 289–304, 1994.

G. G. Raffelt, “Limits on neutrino electromagnetic properties—an update,” Physics Reports, vol. 320, no. 1–6, pp. 319–327, 1999.

A. V. Kuznetsov, N. V. Mikheev, and A. A. Okrugin, “Reexamination of a bound on the dirac neutrino magnetic moment from the supernova neutrino luminosity,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 24, no. 31, p. 5977, 2009.

R. Barbieri and R. N. Mohapatra, “Limit on the magnetic moment of the neutrino from supernova 1987A observations,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 27–30, 1988.

R. Escribano and E. Massó, “Improved bounds on the electromagnetic dipole moments of the tau lepton,” Physics Letters B, vol. 395, no. 3-4, pp. 369–372, 1997.

P. Vogel and J. Engel, “Neutrino electromagnetic form factors,” Physical Review D, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 3378–3383, 1989.

R. M. Barnett, C. D. Carone, D. E. Groom, et al., “Review of particle physics,” Physical Review D, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1–708, 1996.

G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins, “Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals,” Physical Review D, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 3873–3889, 1998.

H. Grotch and R. Robinet, “Limits on the neutrino electromagnetic properties from single photon searches at colliders,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 553–556, 1988.

P. Abreu, W. Adam, T. Adye, et al., “Search for new phenomena using single photon events at LEP1,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 577–586, 1997.

J. M. Hernández, M. A. Pérez, G. Tavares-Velasco, and J. J. Toscano, “Decay γ in the standard model,” Physical Review D, vol. 60, no. 1, Article ID 013004, 11 pages, 1999.

M. A. Pérez, G. Tavares-Velasco, and J. J. Toscano, “New physics effects in rare Z decays,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 159, 2004.

F. Larios, M. A. Pérez, and G. Tavares-Velasco, “Constraints on neutrino-photon interactions from rare Z decays,” Physics Letters B, vol. 531, no. 3-4, pp. 231–236, 2002.

A. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, M. A. Hernández, M. Maya, and A. Rosado, “Bounding the tau neutrino magnetic moment at CERN LEP in a left-right symmetric model,” Physical Review D, vol. 58, no. 11, Article ID 117302, 3 pages, 1998.

A. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, M. A. Hernández, A. Rosado, and M. Maya, “Measurement of the magnctic moment at CERN LEP in a left-right symmctric model,” Revista Mexicana de Fisica, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 249–253, 1999.

A. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez and M. A. Hernández, “Bound the magnetic moment from the process γ in a left-right symmetric model,” Acta Physica Slovaca, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 293–305, 2003.

A. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, M. A. Hernández-Ruíz, and A. Del Rio–De Santiago, “Bounds on the magnetic moment and the electric dipole moment of the neutrino via the process γ,” Physical Review D, vol. 69, no. 7, Article ID 073008, 7 pages, 2004.

A. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, M. A. Hernández-Ruíz, B. Jayme-Valdés, and M. A. Pérez, “Bounding the magnetic and electric dipole moments of from the process γ in superstring models,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 5, Article ID 053002, 6 pages, 2006.

A. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, “Bounds on the dipole moments of the tau-neutrino via the process γ in a 331 model,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 71, p. 1819, 2011.

A. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, “Dipole moments of the tau neutrino via the process γ in a 331 model,” Pramana, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 903–906, 2012.

C. Aydin, M. Bayar, and N. Kilic, “The bounds on the magnetic moment of the τ-neutrino via the process γ,” Chinese Physics C, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 608–611, 2008.

M. Maya, M. A. Pérez, G. Tavares-Velasco, and B. Vega, “A direct constraint on dimension-eight operators from ,” Physics Letters B, vol. 434, no. 3-4, pp. 354–357, 1998.

A. Aydemir and R. Sever, “Bounding the tau neutrino magnetic moment from the process ,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 16, no. 7, p. 457, 2001.

K. Akama, T. Hattori, and K. Katsuura, “Naturalness bounds on dipole moments from new physics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 88, no. 20, Article ID 201601, 4 pages, 2002.

A. M. Cooper-Sarkar and S. Sarkar, “Bound on the tau neutrino magnetic moment from the BEBC beam dump experiment,” Physics Letters B, vol. 280, no. 1-2, pp. 153–158, 1992.

G. F. Giudice, “Tau neutrino as dark matter,” Physics Letters B, vol. 251, no. 3, pp. 460–464, 1990.

M. A. Pérez and F. Ramírez-Zavaleta, “CP violating effects in the decay γ induced by ZZ γ and Z γγ couplings,” Physics Letters B, vol. 609, no. 1-2, pp. 68–72, 2005.