Advances in High Energy Physics

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 935840, 11 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/935840

Research Article

Anomalous Couplings in Collision at the LHC

M. Köksal and S. C. İnan

Department of Physics, Cumhuriyet University, 58140 Sivas, Turkey

Received 4 February 2014; Revised 28 April 2014; Accepted 1 June 2014; Published 2 July 2014

Academic Editor: Frank Filthaut

Copyright © 2014 M. Köksal and S. C. İnan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP³.

Abstract.

We have examined the constraints on the anomalous    couplings through the process at the LHC by considering four forward detector acceptances: , , , and , where with and the energies of the photon and of the incoming proton, respectively. The sensitivity bounds on the anomalous couplings have been obtained at the 95% confidence level in a model independent effective Lagrangian approach. We have found that the bounds on these couplings can be highly improved compared to current experimental bounds.

1. Introduction

The top quark is the heaviest particle of the standard model (SM). Therefore, the top quark properties and their production process provide a possibility for probing new physics beyond the SM. Furthermore, the impacts of new physics on the top quark couplings are considered to be larger than those on any other fermions, and conflicts with the SM expectations could be measured as described in [1]. A search for rare decays of the top quark is one of such studies. The search for the top quark anomalous interactions via flavour changing neutral currents (FCNC) is of special interest. For the top quark, FCNC decays () cannot be seen at the tree level of the SM. These decays can only make loop contributions. As a result, the branching ratios of are very small, and they are at the order of [2–5]. However, various extensions of the SM, such as the quark-singlet model [6–9], the two-Higgs doublet model [2, 10–14], the minimal supersymmetric model [15–22], supersymmetry [23], the topcolor-assisted technicolor model [24], or extra dimension model [25, 26] could lead to a huge enrichment of those kinds of decays.

The CDF collaboration bounds on the branching ratios at C.L. for the process as follows [27]:

Furthermore, the ZEUS collaboration obtained upper limits at C.L. on the anomalous couplings [28]. The large hadron collider (LHC) can produce a large number of top quarks. Therefore, top quark interactions can be examined with high sensitivity. In particular, ATLAS collaboration has predicted a sensitivity of at level [29].

The FCNC effective Lagrangian among the top quark, two quarks , , and the photon can be written as [28]

Here is the anomalous coupling for the neutral currents with a photon; is a new physics scale; ; is the electromagnetic coupling constant; is the electric charge of the top quark. is the conventionally taken mass of the top quark () for the sake of definiteness. Hence, we take . Also, we assume in our calculations that . Using the anomalous interaction given in (2), the decay width can be obtained as follows:

where we put the masses of the and quarks equal to the zero. Branching ratio of the anomalous decay can be given by the following equation, since the main decay mode of the top quark is :

Using this equation, from the experimental constraints of the CDF collaboration it is easy to obtain magnitude of the upper limit on .

In this work, we have examined anomalous FCNC interactions for the process at the LHC. We show a schematic diagram for the this reaction in Figure 1. The subprocess of the main reaction is . This process is becoming interesting as an additional way to investigate for SM or new physics.

Figure 1: Schematic diagram for the reaction .

In many situations, ultraperipheral collisions and elastic interactions can not be detected at the central detectors. Forward detectors are developed by the ATLAS and CMS collaborations to detect the scattering particles which cannot be caught by the central detectors with limited pseudorapidity. These extra detectors are placed at distance of 220 m–420 m from the central detectors. Usual deep inelastic scattering (DIS) incoming protons dissociate into partons. Therefore, DIS interactions have very sophisticated backgrounds. In the DIS process, made-up of jets from the proton remnants, some ambiguities are created which make it hard to detect the new physics signals beyond the SM. However, or interactions have a clean environment compared to the usual proton-proton DIS, since in or collisions with almost real photons, a photon is emitted, while the proton remains intact. Because of both of the incoming protons remaining intact, collisions provide fewer backgrounds compared to the other processes. However, collisions have higher energy and effective luminosity with respect to interactions.

In collisions, the almost real photons with low virtuality are emitted from only one of the proton beams and it is a good approximation to assume that they are on-mass-shell. Because of the low virtuality of the photons, the structures of the photon emitting protons are not spoilt. Also, almost real photons are scattered with small angles, and then they have a low transverse momentum. Since these photons have very high energy, they can interact with quarks in the other incoming proton’s internal structure. On the other hand, intact protons which are emitting photons deflect slightly their path along the beam pipe, and, generally, they cannot be detected in central detectors. One of the main properties of forward detectors is to detect the intact protons with some momentum fraction loss given the formula , where and are momentums of incoming protons and intact scattered protons, respectively. At very high energies, it is a good approximation to write where , are the energies of the proton emitting the photon and of the photon, respectively. If the forward detectors are established closer to central detectors, a higher can be obtained. Forward detectors can detect intact outgoing protons in the interval . This interval is known as the acceptance of the forward detectors. ATLAS forward detectors have an acceptance of [30] and CMS-TOTEM forward detectors are placed closer to the central detectors and the acceptances span , [31, 32].

Photon-induced reactions in hadron collider phenomena were recently observed in the measurements of the CDF collaboration [33–39], and these measurements are consistent in both theoretical expectations with through two-photon exchange (). Therefore, the photon-induced interactions’ potential at the LHC is significant, with its high energetic collisions, and high luminosity [30–32, 40–60]. Moreover, two photon reactions , , and have been measured by the CMS collaboration from the early LHC data at TeV [61–63].

The photon-induced reactions in collisions can be obtained in the framework of the equivalent photon approximation (EPA) [64, 65]. In this approximation the equivalent photon spectrum, given the virtuality and the energy of the quasireal photons (), is given as follows:

where is the incoming proton energy (). The remaining terms are as follows:

Here, is the mass of the proton, is the squared magnetic moment of the proton, and are functions of the electric and magnetic form factors, respectively, and are the energies of the proton emitting the photon and of the photon, respectively. The cross section for the main process can be found by integrating subprocess cross section over the photon and quark spectra:

where is the momentum fraction of the proton’s momentum carried by the quark. is the quark distribution function of the proton. Also, we have taken the since greater than does not make a significant contribution to this integral. From (7) the following equation can be obtained:

where is total mass of the final state particles of the subprocess and with . In our paper, we have used Martin et al. parton distribution functions [66]. During calculations, we have taken the quark virtuality . In all the results presented in this work, we impose a cut of pseudorapidity for final state particles from subprocess since central detectors of the ATLAS and CMS have a pseudorapidity coverage of 2.5.

2. Phenomenological Analysis

The subprocess consists of , , and channel tree-level SM diagrams. Additionally, there is a one tree-level Feynman diagram containing anomalous coupling in Figure 2. The total polarization summed amplitude squared is given in Appendix. In our calculations, it is assumed that the center of mass energy of the LHC is 14 TeV.

Figure 2: Tree level Feynman diagrams for the subprocess () in the presence of the anomalous couplings.

The total cross sections as a function of for four acceptance regions , , , and are presented in Figure 3. We see from this figure that total cross sections for the and are close to each other. In Figure 4, we have plotted the SM and total cross sections of as functions of the transverse momentum cut ( cut or ) of the final state particles for and two forward detectors acceptance regions: and . Figure 5 same as Figure 4 but for the other acceptances regions: and . As seen from these figures, in actual experiments both angular distribution and the cut can be used to improve the sensitivity bounds since contributions of the new physics and the SM are well separated from each other for high cut regions. Moreover, the acceptance region has almost the same features as the other acceptance regions with a high cut. It can be concluded that a high lower bound of the acceptance region mimics an extra cut. Therefore, in this paper we estimate sensitivity of the process to be anomalous couplings using two different statistical analysis methods. First, we use a Poisson distribution, which is the appropriate sensitivity analysis since the number of SM events with these cuts is small enough. In this statistical analysis, the number of observed events is assumed to be equal to the SM prediction . Here is the survival probability factor, is the jet reconstruction efficiency, and is the integrated luminosity. We have taken a survival probability factor of [67], and the jet reconstruction efficiency of . We consider boson decay leptonically; hence, here BR is the branching ratio of boson to leptons. In the second statistical analysis, we have used the criterion without a systematic error which is given by

where is the total cross section including and new physics and is the statistical error. We show the sensitivity of the 95% C.L. parameter as a function of integrated LHC luminosity for and in Figure 6 and , in Figure 7. We set GeV and in these figures.

Figure 3: The total cross sections of as a function of anomalous coupling () for four different forward detector acceptances stated in the figure. It is assumed that the center of mass energy of the LHC is  TeV. Also, we impose cuts and  GeV.

Figure 4: Cross sections of as a function of the transverse momentum cut on the final state particles for two forward detector acceptances: and . Solid lines are for the SM and the dotted lines are for the total cross sections with . We impose cuts and  GeV.

Figure 5: Cross sections of as a function of the transverse momentum cut on the final state particles for two forward detector acceptances: and . Solid lines are for the SM and the dotted lines are for the total cross sections with . We impose cuts and  GeV.

Figure 6: C.L. sensitivity bounds for as a function of integrated LHC luminosity for two forward detector acceptances: and . We impose the following cuts:  GeV and .

Figure 7: C.L. sensitivity bounds for as a function of integrated LHC luminosity for two forward detector acceptances: and . We impose the following cuts:  GeV and .

During calculations, we considered all tree-level SM contributions for the subprocess (Figure 2). These generate major backgrounds. On the other hand, the leading order background to this process might be coming from the pomeron-quark interaction. A pomeron emitted from one of the incoming proton beams can collide with the other proton’s quarks and the same final state particles can take place. However, when examined in detail it can be seen that this background process is expected to have a quite small influence on limits of the anomalous coupling. In DIS process, the virtuality of the struck quark is quite high. In this work, we take the virtuality of the struck quark . Hence, when a pomeron collides with a quark it may be dissociated into partons. Pomeron remnants can be caught by the calorimeters and this background can be removed. Moreover, the survival probability for a pomeron exchange is quite smaller than the survival probability of induced photons. Hence, even if the background from pomeron exchange cannot be eliminated, it does not affect the bounds on anomalous coupling [30, 59].

In low luminosity values, the pileup of events is negligible in interactions at the LHC. However, these backgrounds can be suppressed by using exclusivity conditions, kinematics, and timing constraints at high luminosity [30, 68–70]. For these purposes, we give the sensitivity bounds for between luminosity values of 1–200 fb⁻¹ in Figures 6 and 7. As seen from these figures, SM backgrounds could be smaller than depending on the integrated luminosity. Therefore, in these kinematical regions we have used Poisson analysis for the and we have used criterion for . We understand from the figures that the best sensitivity has been obtained in the case. In Figure 8 we show the 95% C.L. lower bounds for as a function of integrated LHC luminosity for , , and  GeV. Figure 9 same as Figure 8 but for and . In this high cut region, SM events are smaller than for all of the luminosity values as seen from Figures 4 and 5. Hence, in Figures 8 and 9 we use only Poisson analysis. These figures show that the obtained sensitivity bounds in Figures 6 and 7 are better than in Figures 8 and 9. However, high cut regions have a very clean environment. Therefore, any signal which conflicts with the SM expectations would be a credible clue for there being something beyond the SM.

Figure 8: C.L. sensitivity bounds for as a function of integrated LHC luminosity for two forward detector acceptances: and . We impose the following cuts: GeV and .

Figure 9: C.L. sensitivity bounds for as a function of integrated LHC luminosity for two forward detector acceptances: and . We impose the following cuts:  GeV and .

3. Conclusions

By using very forward detectors, the LHC can be designed as a high energy photon-photon and photon-proton collider. There is no existing high energy photon-photon and photon-proton collider with this property. The process provides fewer backgrounds than the pure DIS process due to one of the incoming protons being intact after the collision. The detection of the intact protons in forward detectors makes it possible to determine the momentum of the quasireal photons. This situation may be useful in determining the kinematics of the process. Moreover, anomalous couplings might also be uniquely revealed in single top photoproduction [30].

In these motivations, we have analysed the potential of the at the LHC to probe anomalous couplings for four forward detector acceptances , , , and . We determined that this photon-induced process has an important potential to examine anomalous couplings. We have investigated the sensitivity bounds for  GeV and  GeV regions. The sensitivity bounds on coupling are better than the current experimental results even at luminosity value of 1 . For this luminosity value, bounds on coupling can be improved times with respect to present experimental data as seen from Figure 6.

On the other hand, we show that obtained results improve the sensitivity bounds by up to a factor of for with respect to current experimental data as seen from Figure 6. Furthermore, for  GeV, the results improve the sensitivity bounds on couplings by up to a factor of for . These high cut regions can give extra opportunities to search for new physics with very low backgrounds. As a result, forward detectors provide an enhancement of the physics studied at the LHC.

Appendix

With the total polarization summed amplitude squared which consists of SM, new physics and interference parts have been obtained in functions of the Mandelstam invariants , , and as follows:

where and are the electromagnetic and weak coupling constants, is the quark mass, and is the boson mass. , , , and are the momentums of the photon, incoming quark, boson, and quark, respectively. and are the corresponding CKM matrix elements. () is the electric charge of the () quark. Also, is the total decay width of the top quark. We have neglected the mass of the incoming quarks.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, “A minimal set of top anomalous couplings,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 812, no. 1-2, pp. 181–204, 2009.

B. Grzadkowski, J. F. Gunion, and P. Krawczyk, “Neutral current flavor changing decays for the Z boson and the top quark in two-Higgs doublet models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 268, no. 1, pp. 106–111, 1991.

G. Eilam, J. L. Hewett, and A. Soni, “Rare decays of the top quark in the standard and two-Higgs-doublet models,” Physical Review D, vol. 44, pp. 1473–1484, 1991.

G. Eilam, J. L. Hewett, and A. Soni, “Rare decays of the top quark in the standard and two-Higgs-doublet models,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, Article ID 039901, 1999.

G. Couture, C. Hamzaoui, and H. König, “Flavor-changing top quark decay within the minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Physical Review D, vol. 52, article 1713, 1995.

J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and B. M. Nobre, “Rare top decays and CKM unitarity,” Physics Letters B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics, vol. 553, no. 3-4, pp. 251–260, 2003.

F. del Aguila, J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, and R. Miquel, “Constraints on top couplings in models with exotic quarks,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 82, no. 8, pp. 1628–1631, 1999.

J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, “Effects of mixing with quark singlets,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, Article ID 035003, 2003.

J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, “Effects of mixing with quark singlets,” Physical Review D, vol. 69, Article ID 099901, 2004.

T. P. Cheng and M. Sher, “Mass-matrix ansatz and flavor nonconservation in models with multiple Higgs doublets,” Physical Review D, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 3484–3491, 1987.

M. E. Luke and M. J. Savage, “Flavour changing neutral currents, weak-scale scalars and rare top decays,” Physics Letters B, vol. 307, no. 3-4, pp. 387–393, 1993.

D. Atwood, L. Reina, and A. Soni, “Probing flavor-changing top-charm-scalar interactions in e+e- collisions,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1199–1201, 1996.

D. Atwood, L. Reina, and A. Soni, “Phenomenology of two Higgs doublet models with flavor-changing neutral currents,” Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 3156–3176, 1997.

S. Bejar, J. Guasch, and J. Sola, “Loop induced flavor changing neutral decays of the top quark in a general two-Higgs-doublet model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 600, no. 1, pp. 21–38, 2001.

C. S. Li, R. J. Oakes, and J. M. Yang, “Rare decays of the top quark in the minimal supersymmetric model,” Physical Review D, vol. 49, article 293, 1994.

C. S. Li, R. J. Oakes, and J. M. Yang, “Rare decays of the top quark in the minimal supersymmetric model,” Physical Review D, vol. 56, article 3156, 1997.

G. M. de Divitiis, R. Petronzio, and L. Silvestrini, “Flavour changing top decays in supersymmetric extensions of the standard model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 504, no. 1-2, pp. 45–60, 1997.

J. L. Lopez, D. V. Nanopoulos, and R. Rangarajan, “New supersymmetric contributions to ,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 3100–3106, 1997.

J. Guasch and J. Sola, “FCNC top quark decays in the MSSM: a door to SUSY physics in high luminosity colliders?” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 562, no. 1-2, pp. 3–28, 1999.

D. Delépine and S. Khalil, “Top flavour violating decays in general supersymmetric models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 599, no. 1-2, pp. 62–74, 2004.

J. J. Liu, C. S. Li, L. L. Yang, and L. G. Jin, “ via SUSY FCNC couplings in the unconstrained MSSM,” Physics Letters B, vol. 599, no. 1-2, pp. 92–101, 2004.

J. J. Cao, G. Eilam, M. Frank et al., “Supersymmetry-induced flavor-changing neutral-current top-quark processes at the CERN Large Hadron Collider,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, Article ID 075021, 2007.

J. M. Yang, B.-L. Young, and X. Zhang, “Flavor changing top quark decays in R parity violating SUSY,” Physical Review D, vol. 58, Article ID 055001, 1998.

G. Lu, F. Yin, X. Wang, and L. Wan, “The Rare top quark decays in the topcolor assisted technicolor model,” Physical Review D, vol. 68, Article ID 015002, 2003.

G. P. K. Agashe and A. Soni, “Flavor structure of warped extra dimension models,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, Article ID 016002, 2005.

G. P. K. Agashe and A. Soni, “Collider signals of top quark flavor violation from a warped extra dimension,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, Article ID 015002, 2007.

F. Abe, H. Akimoto, A. Akopian, et al., “Search for flavor-changing neutral current decays of the top quark in collisions at TeV,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, pp. 2525–2530, 1998.

H. Abramowicz, I. Abt, L. Adamczyk, et al., “Search for single-top production in ep collisions at HERA,” Physics Letters B, vol. 708, no. 1-2, pp. 27–36, 2012.

J. Carvalho, N. Castro, L. Chikovani, et al., “Study of ATLAS sensitivity to FCNC top decays,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 52, 4, pp. 999–1019, 2007.

M. Albrow, R. B. Appleby, M. Arneodo, et al., “The FP420 R&D project: higgs and new physics with forward protons at the LHC,” Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 4, Article ID T10001, 2009.

O. Kepka and C. Royon, “Anomalous WWγ coupling in photon-induced processes using forward detectors at the CERN LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, Article ID 073005, 2008.

V. Avati and K. Osterberg, “Acceptance calculations methods for low–β* optics,” Report CERN-TOTEM-NOTE-2005-002, 2006.

A. Abulencia, J. Adelman, T. Affolder, et al., “Observation of exclusive electron-positron production in Hadron-Hadron collisions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 98, Article ID 112001, 2007.

T. Aaltonen, S. Amerio, D. Amidei, et al., “Search for exclusive production in Hadron-Hadron collisions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, Article ID 242002, 2007.

T. Aaltonen, S. Amerio, D. Amidei, et al., “Observation of exclusive dijet production at the Fermilab Tevatron collider,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, Article ID 052004, 2008.

T. Aaltonen, J. Adelman, T. Akimoto, (CDF Collaboration), et al., “Observation of exclusive charmonium production and in collisions at TeV,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, Article ID 242001, 2009.

T. Aaltonen, S. Amerio, D. Amidei, et al., “Search for exclusive Z-boson production and observation of high-mass events in collisions at TeV,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, Article ID 222002, 2009.

O. Kepka and C. Royon, “Search for exclusive events using the dijet mass fraction at the Fermilab Tevatron,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, Article ID 034012, 2007.

M. Rangel, C. Royon, G. Alves, J. Barreto, and R. Peschanski, “Diffractive χ production at the Tevatron and the LHC,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 774, no. 1–3, pp. 53–63, 2007.

I. F. Ginzburg and A. Schiller, “Search for a heavy magnetic monopole at the Fermilab Tevatron and CERN LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. R6599–R6603, 1998.

I. F. Ginzburg and A. Schiller, “Search for a heavy magnetic monopole at the Tevatron and CERN LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 57, pp. 6599–6603, 1998.

S. Lietti, A. Natale, C. Roldao, and R. Rosenfeld, “Searching for anomalous Higgs couplings in peripheral heavy ion collisions at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 497, 3-4, pp. 243–248, 2001.

K. Piotrzkowski, “Tagging two-photon production at the CERN large Hadron Collider,” Physical Review D, vol. 63, Article ID 071502(R), 2001.

V. Goncalves and M. Machado, “Diffractive photoproduction of heavy quarks in hadronic collisions,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, Article ID 031502(R), 2007.

M. Machado, “Investigating the exclusive protoproduction of dileptons at high energies,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, Article ID 034016, 2008.

S. Atag, S. C. İnan, and I. Şahin, “Extra dimensions in photon-induced two lepton final states at the CERN LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 7, Article ID 075009, 2009.

V. A. Khoze, A. D. Martin, R. Orava, and M. G. Ryskin, “Luminosity measuring processes at the LHC,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 313–322, 2001.

M. G. Albrow, T. D. Coughlin, and J. R. Forshaw, “Central exclusive particle production at high energy hadron colliders,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 149–184, 2010.

İ. Şahin and S. C. İnan, “Probe of unparticles at the LHC in exclusive two lepton and two photon production via photon-photon fusion,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 9, article 69, 2009.

S. C. İnan, “Exclusive excited leptons search in two lepton final states at the CERN LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, Article ID 115002, 2010.

E. Chapon, C. Royon, and O. Kepka, “Anomalous quartic , and trilinear couplings in two-photon processes at high luminosity at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, Article ID 074003, 2010.

S. Atağ and A. A. Billur, “Possibility of determining τ lepton electromagnetic moments in process at the CERN-LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 11, article 60, 2010.

I. Şahin and A. Billur, “Anomalous couplings in p collision at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, Article ID 035011, 2011.

M. Koksal and S. C. Inan, “Search for the anomalous interactions of up-type heavy quarks in γ γ collision at the LHC,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, Article ID 315826, 8 pages, 2014.

S. C. Inan and A. Billur, “Polarized top pair production in extra dimension models via photon-photon fusion at the CERN LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, Article ID 095002, 2011.

R. S. Gupta, “Probing quartic neutral gauge boson couplings using diffractive photon fusion at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, Article ID 014006, 2012.

I. Sahin, “Electromagnetic properties of the neutrinos in collision at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, Article ID 033002, 2012.

L. N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti, C. A. García Canal, V. A. Mitsou, and V. Vento, “Looking for magnetic monopoles at LHC with diphoton events,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 127, article 60, 2012.

I. Sahin and B. Sahin, “Anomalous quartic couplings in collision at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, Article ID 115001, 2012.

A. A. Billur, “Anomalous top-gluon couplings in γp collision at the CERN-LHC,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 101, no. 2, Article ID 21001, 2013.

S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, and A. M. Sirunyan, “Exclusive production in proton-proton collisions at ,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, article 52, 2012.

S. Chatrchyan, “CMS collaboration,” The Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1211, article 80, 2012.

S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan, et al., “Study of exclusive two-photon production of W+W- in pp collisions at sv=7 TeV and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, article 116, 2013.

V. M. Budnev, I. F. Ginzburg, G. V. Meledin, and V. G. Serbo, “The two-photon particle production mechanism. Physical problems. Applications. Equivalent photon approximation,” Physics Reports, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 181–282, 1975.

G. Baur, “Coherent γ γ and γA interactions in very peripheral collisions at relativistic ion colliders,” Physics Reports, vol. 364, no. 5, pp. 359–450, 2002.

A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, G. Watt, et al., “Parton distributions for the LHC,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 189–285, 2009.

V. A. Khoze, A. D. Martin, and M. G. Ryskin, “Photon-exchange processes at hadron colliders as a probe of the dynamics of diffraction,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 459–468, 2002.

B. E. Cox, F. K. Loebinger, and A. D. Pilkington, “Detecting Higgs bosons in the decay channel using forward proton tagging at the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 0710, 2007.

S. Heinemeyer, V. A. Khoze, M. G. Ryskin, W. J. Stirling, M. Tasevsky, and G. Weiglein, “Studying the MSSM Higgs sector by forward proton tagging at the LHC,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 231–256, 2008.

S. Heinemeyer, V. A. Khoze, M. G. Ryskin, M. Tasevsky, and G. Weiglein, “Central Exclusive Production of BSM Higgs bosons at the LHC,” Report number: IPPP/08/85, DCPT/08/170, http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.4571