Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 8321513, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8321513

Research Article

Charmonium Mass Spectrum with Spin-Dependent Interaction in Momentum-Helicity Space

M. Radin

Department of Physics, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, P.O. Box 16315-1618, Tehran, Iran

Correspondence should be addressed to M. Radin; radin@kntu.ac.ir

Received 28 August 2016; Revised 27 October 2016; Accepted 29 November 2016; Published 21 February 2017

Academic Editor: Mohammadreza Hadizadeh

Copyright © 2017 M. Radin. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP³.

Abstract.

In this paper we have solved the nonrelativistic form of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation in the momentum-helicity space by inserting a spin-dependent quark-antiquark potential model numerically. To this end, we have used the momentum-helicity basis states for describing a nonrelativistic reduction of one-gluon exchange potential. Then we have calculated the mass spectrum of the charmonium , and finally we have compared the results with the other theoretical results and experimental data.

1. Introduction

During the past years, several models and methodological approaches based on solving the relativistic and nonrelativistic form of the Schrödinger or Lippmann-Schwinger equation have been developed for studying the light and heavy mesons in the coordinate and momentum spaces, respectively.

Recently, the three-dimensional approach based on momentum-helicity basis states for studding the nucleon-nucleon scattering and deuteron state has been developed [1, 2]. We extend this approach to particle physics problems by solving the nonrelativistic form of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation to obtain the mass spectrum of the heavy mesons using the nonrelativistic quark-antiquark interaction in terms of a linear confinement, a Coulomb, and various spin-dependent pieces.

In the heavy-quark mesons the differences between energy levels are small compared to the particle masses. Hence, the nonrelativistic Lippmann-Schwinger equation can be used to study their quantum behavior. To this end, we have used the nonrelativistic form of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation in the momentum-helicity representation to study the charmonium as a heavy meson. For this purpose, we have used a nonrelativistic quark-antiquark potential based on one-gluon exchange in the momentum-helicity representation.

This article is organized as follows. In Section 2, the nonrelativistic Lippmann-Schwinger equation in the momentum-helicity basis states which leads to coupled and uncoupled integral equations for various quantum numbers is presented briefly. In Section 3, a spin-dependent quark-antiquark potential model is described in the momentum-helicity basis states. The details of the numerical calculations and the results obtained for the charmonium are presented in Section 4. Finally, a summary and an outlook are provided in Section 5.

2. Lippmann-Schwinger Equation in Momentum-Helicity Basis States

The nonrelativistic form of the homogenous Lippmann-Schwinger equation for describing the heavy meson bound state is given by

where denotes the quark-antiquark interaction, is mass of the quark or antiquark, and is the meson bound state with the total angular momentum . is projection of the total angular momentum along the quantization axis. The integral form of this equation in the momentum-helicity basis states is written as [3]

with

where is the magnitude of the relative momentum of the quark and antiquark, is the total spin of meson, is the spin projection along the relative momentum, and are the rotation matrices. For an arbitrary total angular momentum , and singlet case of the total spin state, (2) leads to one equation:

Also for and triplet case of the total spin state, (2) leads to one equation as follows:

For and it is more complicated. For example, for , (2) leads to one equation for channel and two coupled equations for channels and as follows:

where is the partial wave component of the wave function which is connected to the momentum-helicity component of the wave function as [3]

The inverse relation is written as

3. Quark-Antiquark Potential in Momentum-Helicity Basis States

The spin-dependent potential model that we have used in our calculations is sum of the Linear and a simple nonrelativistic reduction of an effective one-gluon exchange potential without retardation. This potential in the coordinate space is given in terms of [4]

where is the string tension, is the strong-interaction fine-structure constant, is the color factor which is for quark-antiquark and for quark-quark, and are the Pauli matrices, and is the total orbital angular momentum operator. Fourier transformation of this potential to momentum space yields

where is the momentum transfer. The kernels of integral equations have singularity. To overcome this problem we have used the regularized form of linear confining and Coulomb parts of the potential [5]. Details of Fourier transformation of regularized parts of the potential are given in the appendix. Also we have used a Gaussian form factor, at the quark-gluon vertex as in [6] to remove singularity of the kernels due to existence of one-gluon exchange potential. The variable can be interpreted as size of the quark. In [7] the point-like quark-gluon vertex is replaced by a form factor, in which is the effective quark size to eliminate the singularity. In this work we have used both regularized form and Gaussian form factor for Coulomb and parts of the potential which cause the convergence of numerical results faster. Therefore, the final form of the potential in the momentum-helicity space is written as

where and is the momentum-helicity basis state which is eigenstate of the helicity operator as

Also we have [1]

If the vector p is along -direction, it is clear that (15) is reduced to

For numerical calculations we need the matrix elements of the potential . These matrix elements are related to the matrix elements of (13) as follows:

By considering (13), (16), and (17), the final form of the matrix elements of the potential which is inserted in the numerical calculations is written as

with .

4. Discussion and Numerical Results

For numerical calculations as a first step we have used the Gaussian quadrature grid points to discretize the momentum and the angle variables. The integration interval for the momentum is covered by two different hyperbolic and linear mappings of the Gauss-Legendre points from the interval to the intervals , respectively, as follows:

Then we have calculated the matrix elements of the potential , from (18). According to (3) integration over the spherical angle variable has been done independently. Finally, we have solved the integral equations (4)–(8) as eigenvalue equations. The integration over momentum variable is cut off at = 10 GeV. This selection is carried out so that the numerical results do not depend on this choice. The typical values for and are 1 GeV and 3 GeV, respectively. These selections are done till the total number of grid points for momentum intervals is decreased. Other selections can be done but by different grid points for momentum variables.

The parameters of the potential model which are shown in Table 1 are fixed by a fit to the masses of the states , , and , similar to what is done in [9]. The results of charmonium mass spectrum are shown in Table 2. They are compared with the experimental data and another theoretical work. As it is clear from (7) and (8), the existence of the tensor term in the potential causes the coupling of the - and -partial waves and this coupling as is shown in Table 3 is so weak. I show the mixed charmonium states in Table 2 by their dominant partial wave.

Table 1: Parameters of the model.

1.222

0.3154

1.269

0.2863

10

Table 2: Comparison of the obtained charmonium mass spectrum with the experimental data and another work.

Candidate
Exp. [8]
Ref. [9]
Mass [MeV]

2980
2980.4

3097
3096.9

3527
3526.2

3430
3397.4

3503
3503.5

3674
3683.1

3765
3760.8

3855
3850.6

4291
4285.4

Table 3: Percent of each partial wave in mixed charmonium states.

0.07

0.10

0.12

0.12

As a test of our numerical calculations we have shown convergence of the results as a function of number of grid points , , and for the momentum and angle variables in Table 4. and are the number of grid points for the intervals [0, ] and [, ], respectively. is corresponding to number of grid points for spherical angle variable. In our calculations we have chosen , and grid points for to achieve an acceptable accuracy.

Table 4: The calculated charmonium mass spectrum as function of the number of grid points , , and .

100
100

3096.942
3526.244
3397.517
3503.552
368.3357
3760.778
3850.573
4285.415

100
100

3096.951
3526.226
3397.449
3503.541
3683.153
3760.782
3850.563
4285.410

100
100

3096.954
3526.221
3397.434
3503.539
3683.095
3760.784
3850.561
4285.409

100
100

3096.954
3526.219
3397.431
3503.538
3683.080
3760.784
3850.560
4285.409

100
100

3096.954
3526.219
3397.430
3503.538
3683.075
3760.784
3850.560
4285.409

100
100

3.096954
3526.219
3397.430
3503.538
3683.074
3760.784
3850.560
4285.409

100
100

3.096954
3526.219
3397.430
3503.538
3683.074
3760.784
3850.560
4285.409

100
60

3097.131
3525.746
3397.449
3394.900
3503.182
3677.378
3850.232
4284.965

100
80

3096.961
3526.205
3397.376
3503.530
3682.920
3760.787
3850.553
4285.405

100
100

3096.954
3526.219
3397.431
3503.541
3683.538
3760.080
3850.560
4285.409

100
120

3096.954
3526.219
3397.431
3503.541
3503.538
3683.080
3850.560
4285.409

50
100

3096.954
3526.219
3397.429
3503.538
3683.080
3760.784
3850.558
4285.409

80
100

3096.954
3526.219
3397.430
3503.538
3683.080
3760.784
3850.560
4285.409

100
100

3096.954
3526.219
3397.431
3503.541
3683.080
3760.784
3850.560
4285.409

5. Summary and Outlook

In this paper we have extended an approach based on momentum-helicity basis states for calculation of mass spectrum of heavy mesons by solving nonrelativistic form of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation. As an application we have used this approach to obtain the mass spectrum of charmonium. The advantage of working with helicity states is that states are the eigenstates of the helicity operator appearing in the quark-antiquark potential. Thus, using the helicity representation is less complicated than using the spin representation with a fixed quantization axis for representation of spin-dependent potentials. This work is the first step toward studying single, double, and triple heavy-flavor baryons in the framework of the nonrelativistic quark model by formulation of the Faddeev equation in the 3D momentum-helicity representation. Furthermore, we can apply this formalism straightforwardly for investigation of heavy pentaquark systems, which can be considered as two-body (heavy meson and baryon) systems with meson-nucleon potentials which is underway.

Appendix

Fourier Transformation of the Regularized Linear Confining and Coulomb Parts of the Potential

The three-dimensional Fourier transformation of the potential is defined as

where . Fourier transformation of the regularized linear confining and Coulomb parts of the quark-antiquark potential is written as

where potential is kept fixed at cutoff . Therefore inserting the linear and Coulomb , parts of quark-antiquark potential, in the above equation and calculation of corresponding integrals analytically yield

Competing Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

I. Fachruddin, C. Elster, and W. Glöckle, “Nucleon-nucleon scattering in a three dimensional approach,” Physical Review C, vol. 62, no. 4, Article ID 044002, 2000.

I. Fachruddin, C. Elster, and W. Glöckle, “New forms of deuteron equations and wave function representations,” Physical Review C—Nuclear Physics, vol. 63, no. 5, Article ID 054003, 2001.

M. Radin and N. Tazimi, “Quark-antiquark bound state in momentum-helicity representation,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, no. 8, Article ID 085020, 2014.

S. N. Gupta, S. F. Radford, and W. W. Repko, “Quarkonium spectra and quantum chromodynamics,” Physical Review D, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 3305–3308, 1982.

M. R. Hadizadeh and L. Tomio, “Solution of two-body bound state problems with confining potentials,” in Proceedings of the International Conference “1st Stars and Galaxies: Challenges for the Next Decade”, pp. 334–337, AIP, São Paulo, Brazil, March 2010.

J. Carlson, J. B. Kogut, and V. R. Pandharipande, “Hadron spectroscopy in a flux-tube quark model,” Physical Review D, vol. 28, no. 11, article 2807, 1983.

D. P. Stanley and D. Robson, “Nonperturbative potential model for light and heavy quark-antiquark systems,” Physical Review D, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 3180–3196, 1980.

S. Eidelman, K. G. Hayes, K. A. Olive et al., “Review of particle physics,” Physics Letters B, vol. 592, no. 1–4, pp. 1–5, 2004.

J. Eiglsperger, Quarkonium spectroscopy: beyond one-gluon exchange [Diploma thesis], Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany, 2007.