Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 167823, 6 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/167823

Research Article

Scaling Analysis of the Tensile Strength of Bamboo Fibers Using Weibull Statistics

Jiaxing Shao,1,2 Fang Wang,1,2 Lu Li,1,2 and Junqian Zhang³

¹School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

²Faculty of Materials and Energy, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

³Department of Mechanics, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Mechanics in Energy and Environment Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

Received 12 July 2013; Accepted 19 September 2013

Academic Editor: Xing Chen

Copyright © 2013 Jiaxing Shao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

This study demonstrates the effect of weak-link scaling on the tensile strength of bamboo fibers. The proposed model considers the random nature of fiber strength, which is reflected by using a two-parameter Weibull distribution function. Tension tests were performed on samples that could be scaled in length. The size effects in fiber length on the strength were analyzed based on Weibull statistics. The results verify the use of Weibull parameters from specimen testing for predicting the strength distributions of fibers of longer gauge lengths.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, natural fiber reinforcement has gained much attention as realistic, environmental-friendly alternatives to synthetic fibers. As typical biological materials with unique multiscale structures, natural fibers approximate or even exceed the specific mechanical properties of man-made fibers [1]. Among many natural fibers used as composite materials, bamboo fiber is one that offers the most potential because of its low density, low cost, high specific strength, and stiffness [2]. Understanding the mechanical properties of bamboo fiber is necessary for ensuring the reliability of such materials for designing proper composite structures.

Fibers are the main load-bearing elements of a fiber-reinforced composite, which means that most of the mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced composites are primarily affected by fiber strength distribution [3] and gauge length dependence [4]. The properties of bamboo fibers depend on growing condition, including growth duration and procedures involved in extracting the fiber from the plant [5]. In addition, bamboo fibers are typically brittle [6]. The strength of brittle materials and the effect of size have drawn the attention of scientists and technologists [7–11]. The statistical weakest link theory, which was formulated based on conventional brittle fracture study, is based on the assumption that a material can be divided into smaller elements that are linked together, with the fracture beginning in the weakest link, and failure occurs when any of the links fail [12]. Considering that fiber strength is not constant even with uniform length and diameter, the statistical strength of fibers depends on the distribution of defects within the fiber. Although many studies have tried to predict fiber strength [5, 10, 13], very few statistical strength models have tried to describe the failure behavior of bamboo fibers. Therefore, we need an efficient method for evaluating bamboo strength for design and manufacturing.

The aim of the present paper is to investigate the scaling effects involved in predicting the ultimate tensile strength of bamboo fibers. Tension tests were performed to describe the statistical strength distributions of bamboo fibers. The measured fiber strengths at different gauge lengths were analyzed according to a two-parameter Weibull distribution. Thus, we established a method for determining statistical parameters used for characterizing strength distribution. Fibers 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 mm long were used to investigate the dependence of strength on fiber size. The accuracy of using weak-link scaling statistics for fiber strength was also examined.

2. Experimental Procedure

The bamboo fibers were produced by Ban Ltd., Tokushima, Japan. The scanning electron micrograph of the longitudinal section of a bamboo fiber measured in the present study is shown in Figure 1. Bamboo fibers were clearly composed of elementary fibers connected by constituents, such as considerable amounts of pectins [14]. Although the microstructural framework of bamboo fibers could be called “elementary bamboo fiber bundles,” it was treated as a single fiber during macroscale tensile deformation [15]. In the present study, fiber diameter ranged from 150 μm to 450 μm. To study size effects on fiber length, the samples used in all tests had the same diameters, approximately  μm.

Figure 1: Longitudinal photomicrographs of bamboo fiber.

To fix the fiber as straight as possible between the clamps, a fiber specimen is mounted on a paper frame that matches the gauge length chosen for the test. The ends of the fiber were glued to the tab using a double-sided adhesive. The frame was cut after clamping in the jaws of the testing machine. The opening of the paper frame determined the gauge length. For this experiment, the gauge lengths were set to 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 mm. Fifty individual fibers were tested at each of the five gauge lengths. Fiber length was measured to an accuracy of ±1 mm at each end. Tests were performed on a variety of lengths to investigate the effects of fiber length on tensile strength. To prevent additional flaws caused by the clamping force, samples broken near the edge of the clamps were excluded from the analysis.

Fiber specimens were mechanically tested on a WDW3050 computer-controlled universal testing machine. All static tests were conducted in displacement control mode at a rate of 0.5 mm/min and at ambient temperature under atmospheric pressure. All samples were maintained under load until mechanical failure occurred, with failure being defined as the point in which the laminate no longer supported the externally applied load. The forces applied and the testing machine displacements were directly recorded by an acquisition system and on a chart recorder. Therefore, tensile strength was taken as the ratio of the maximum load applied to the cross-sectional area of the specimen. Based on a typical load-displacement response shown in Figure 2, the tensile load increased proportionally with increasing strain until the point of ultimate load, which is the point at which the bamboo fibers broke and exhibited brittle fractures with no apparent yielding.

Figure 2: The experimental results of a classical load-displacement curve of bamboo fiber.

3. Weibull Statistics

Brittle fibers typically exhibit wide variability in strength, which is determined by the microstructural flaws that act as stress concentrations. These internal defects occur randomly along the length of the fiber. Fracture stresses measured on specimens with identical dimensions have a statistical distribution because of the widely varying severity of flaws caused by variability in shape, size, and location with respect to stress state [11]. Weibull statistical analysis is the best candidate for characterizing variations in fiber strength [8, 16]. Fiber strength, , is a stochastic variable that can be described by a two-parameter Weibull cumulative distribution function :

where , in the range of , is the failure probability of single fibers under an applied stress less than or equal to . is the Weibull scale parameter or characteristic stress for a reference length . is the Weibull modulus or shape parameter, which describes the variability of the failure strengths. The common values for of pristine fibers range from 2 to 20 [3].

Since follows a Weibull distribution, the probability density function (PDF) of is obtained from (1), which is

Figure 3 presents the effect of scale parameter on the shape of the probability density function when  MPa. This finding indicates that variations significantly affect the distribution of fiber tensile strength; that is, smaller values indicate larger spreads in fiber strength and vice versa. A peak of probability density function is observed when is equal to . The parameters and can be calculated statistically as follows:

where and are the mean and variance of random variable, respectively. is the gamma function.

Figure 3: Weibull distribution of fiber strength.

Expressing (1) in a linear form would facilitate using the equation to describe the experimental data. Rearranging and taking logarithms twice resulted in the following equation:

Hence, a plot of versus should give a straight line if the material strength variability is described by the Weibull distribution. The shape parameter and the scale parameter can both be obtained from the slope and -intercept of this line, respectively.

can be calculated using a statistical approximation technique. samples of are ranked in an ascending order, . is denoted by the th strength value ( corresponds to the smallest and corresponds to the highest strength value). Then, the th value is computed as follows:

4. Weak-Link Scaling

Weak-link theory, which accurately describes the failure of many brittle materials, is based on the assumption that the material can be divided into smaller linked elements and that the fracture of a specimen is identified with the unstable propagation of the most “critical” crack [12].

Based on the weakest link theory, Weibull [8] proposed a strength distribution

where is the failure probability of a long fiber that is connected by independent segments and is the tested volume. is the volume of a unit link or segment, which is a scaling constant [17].

If the diameter, , of all fibers is assumed to be the same, (6) can be written as

where is the reference length and is the fiber gauge length.

From (7), the average strength is a power function of gauge length [18],

If the strength of a material is determined by weak-link statistics, longer fibers have a larger number of links than shorter fibers and have a higher probability of encountering a more severe flaw along the fiber [19]. Furthermore, longer fibers have lower average fracture strengths than shorter fibers. In other words, the strength of the materials decreases with increasing size [9]. Therefore, weak-link scaling predictions assume that the strength can be scaled for any fiber length, from a single weak-link point estimate at a chosen fiber gauge length [13].

Considering (7) for the same probability of failure for two specimens with identical stress distributions, the strength values obtained at any given gauge length can be scaled to predict the strength of another length of fiber and for a similar probability of failure as follows:

where and are the fiber strengths at gauge lengths and , respectively. This equation directly links strength to volume; therefore, this equation quantifies the size effect, which is the basis for the statistical weakest link model.

The work by Curtin [20] indicated that a large system could be formally considered to be composed of a collection of independent subsystems linked in series, so that failure in the weakest subsystem causes failure across the entire system. Therefore, the cumulative probability of failure of a fiber with volume loaded with stress is related to the cumulative probability of failure of a  fiber with volume as follows:

With constant fiber diameter, (10) becomes

5. Results and Discussion

5.1. Statistical Distribution of Tensile Strength

Figure 4 shows the histogram of the tensile strength distribution under three fiber lengths (, 30, and 50 mm). Tensile strength is clearly not homogeneous. Ultimate strength is more scattered in shorter fibers than in longer fibers. Therefore, the mean decreases with increased scattering of fiber tensile strength [21].

Figure 4: The experimental probability density function for ultimate strength of bamboo fiber.

A typical Weibull plot of bamboo fracture strength at 20 mm gauge length based on (1) is shown in Figure 5. The linear relationship of versus determined using the least squares method is shown in Figure 5. The coefficient is 0.9883, which indicates a good degree of linearity. From this plot, the statistical parameters of the Weibull distribution can be obtained as listed

Figure 5: Strength distributions of bamboo fibers with  mm.

5.2. Effect of Specimen Length on Ultimate Strength

The relationship between the mean tensile strength of bamboo fiber and the testing gauge length is plotted on Figure 6. Fifty filaments are measured for each data point. The finding shows that the tensile strength depends on the specimen length of the fibers. A decrease in tensile strength was observed with increasing test length, which is attributed to the increasing probability of encountering more severe flaws with larger test lengths. Hence, longer fibers should on average have lower strengths than shorter fibers.

Figure 6: Length dependence of the mean tensile strength of bamboo fibers.

If the characteristic strength at a given gauge length is known, the mean strength at other gauge lengths can be calculated based on (8). In Table 1, the tensile strengths predicted through size scaling from are presented as a function of fiber test length; these findings are in excellent agreement with the experimental measurements. The Weibull theory clearly accounted for the correlation of strength variations with size [22].

Table 1: Comparison of measured and predicted fracture strengths of bamboo fibers.

Fiber test length (mm)
Tensile strength
Difference (%)

Measured by experiment* (MPa)
Predicted by (8) (MPa)

20
555
—
—

30
523
502
4.26

40
492
467
5.35

50
451
442
2.12

60
442
422
4.60

Average value of 50 results.

5.3. Strength Prediction by Weak-Link Scaling

Predictions of the tensile strengths were made by size scaling data from samples of longer gauge lengths to access the accuracy of weak-link scaling. An example comparing the experimental and predicted bamboo strength distribution for  mm is presented in Figure 7. The distribution of open circles is the experimental result for fiber length of . The solid line represents the  mm (fiber gauge length) distribution weak link scaled to (fiber gauge length) using (11). The results show that weak-link scaling works well, except at the lowest or highest fiber strengths. This exception is due to greater distributed damage in fibers than in  mm fibers. The studies in the literature [16, 20] show that a critical damage size is necessary for weak-link scaling, which is the subject of our future study.

Figure 7: Strength distributions for bamboo fibers with  mm.

6. Conclusions

The tensile strength distribution of fibers is a key constitutive property of fiber-reinforced composites. Thus, understanding the scaling effects in the tensile properties of natural fibers is important. In the present study, bamboo fibers were tested with tension at several different gauge lengths. For each gauge length, 50 individual fibers were measured. The experimental fiber strength values were compared with the predicted values through weak-link scaling. The following conclusions were drawn.

(1)Tensile strength of bamboo fibers exhibits statistical Weibull-type distribution, which is not necessarily constant. The two statistical parameters, and , were used to quantify the variations in strength, which can be readily determined from static tensile tests on several fibers at a given gauge length .(2)Ultimate fiber strength depends on specimen length, which is dominated by flaws statistics. This dependence is due to the increased probability of flaws that cause failure with larger material volumes. The gauge length effect on bamboo fiber strength can be predicted through weak-link scaling.(3)The simulated cumulative failure probability from the scaling model is consistent with the test data. These results verify the use of Weibull parameters from specimen testing for predicting the strength distributions of fibers of longer gauge lengths.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of National Science Foundation of China under Grant no. 11102169, National Science Foundation Project of CQ CSTC under Grant no. 2012JJA70002, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant nos. XDJK2013B019, XDJK2013D011.

References

H. P. S. Abdul Khalil, I. U. H. Bhat, M. Jawaid, A. Zaidon, D. Hermawan, and Y. S. Hadi, “Bamboo fibre reinforced biocomposites: a review,” Materials and Design, vol. 42, pp. 353–368, 2012.

A. V. R. Prasad and K. M. Rao, “Mechanical properties of natural fibre reinforced polyester composites: jowar, sisal and bamboo,” Materials and Design, vol. 32, no. 8-9, pp. 4658–4663, 2011.

S. Mahesh, I. J. Beyerlein, and S. L. Phoenix, “Size and heterogeneity effects on the strength of fibrous composites,” Physica D, vol. 133, no. 1–4, pp. 371–389, 1999.

Z. P. Bažant, “Size effect on structural strength: a review,” Archive of Applied Mechanics, vol. 69, no. 9-10, pp. 703–725, 1999.

K. L. Pickering, G. W. Beckermann, S. N. Alam, and N. J. Foreman, “Optimising industrial hemp fibre for composites,” Composites A, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 461–468, 2007.

S. Jain, R. Kumar, and U. C. Jindal, “Mechanical behaviour of bamboo and bamboo composite,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 27, no. 17, pp. 4598–4604, 1992.

F. T. Peirce, “Tensile tests for cotton yarns, V: ‘the weakest link’—theorems on the strength of long and short composite specimens,” Journal of the Textile Institute Transactions, vol. 17, pp. 355–368, 1926.

W. Weibull, “A statistical distribution function of wide applicability,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 293–297, 1951.

W. A. Curtin, “Size scaling of strength in heterogeneous materials,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 1445–1448, 1998.

J. Andersons, R. Joffe, M. Hojo, and S. Ochiai, “Glass fibre strength distribution determined by common experimental methods,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 131–145, 2002.

G. Foray, A. Descamps-Mandine, M. R'Mili, and J. Lamon, “Statistical flaw strength distributions for glass fibres: correlation between bundle test and AFM-derived flaw size density functions,” Acta Materialia, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 3711–3718, 2012.

L. Afferrante, M. Ciavarella, and E. Valenza, “Is Weibull's modulus really a material constant? Example case with interacting collinear cracks,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 43, no. 17, pp. 5147–5157, 2006.

A. S. Virk, W. Hall, and J. Summerscales, “Multiple Data Set (MDS) weak-link scaling analysis of jute fibres,” Composites A, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1764–1771, 2009.

N. Defoirdt, S. Biswas, L. D. Vriese et al., “Assessment of the tensile properties of coir, bamboo and jute fibre,” Composites A, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 588–595, 2010.

H. Takagi and Y. Ichihara, “Effect of fiber length on mechanical properties of “green” composites using a starch-based resin and short bamboo fibers,” JSME International Journal A, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 551–555, 2004.

C. M. Landis, I. J. Beyerlein, and R. M. McMeeking, “Micromechanical simulation of the failure of fiber reinforced composites,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 621–648, 2000.

Y. Zhang, X. Wang, N. Pan, and R. Postle, “Weibull analysis of the tensile behavior of fibers with geometrical irregularities,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1401–1406, 2002.

V. Lavaste, J. Besson, and A. R. Bunsell, “Statistical analysis of strength distribution of alumina based single fibres accounting for fibre diameter variations,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 2042–2048, 1995.

K. L. Pickering and T. L. Murray, “Weak link scaling analysis of high-strength carbon fibre,” Composites A, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1017–1021, 1999.

W. A. Curtin, “Stochastic damage evolution and failure in fiber-reinforced composites,” Advances in Applied Mechanics, vol. 36, pp. 163–253, 1998.

J. Zhang and F. Wang, “Modeling of progressive failure in ductile matrix composites Including local matrix yielding,” Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 522–535, 2009.

L. S. Sutherland, R. A. Shenoi, and S. M. Lewis, “Size and scale effects in composites: I. Literature review,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 209–220, 1999.