Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 734031, 4 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/734031

Research Article

Carbonation Coefficients from Concrete Made with High-Absorption Limestone Aggregate

Eric I. Moreno

College of Engineering, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Avenida Industrias No Contaminantes s/n por Periférico Norte, Mérida, YUC, CP 97110, Mexico

Received 31 May 2013; Accepted 28 August 2013

Academic Editor: Amit Bandyopadhyay

Copyright © 2013 Eric I. Moreno. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Normal aggregates employed in concrete have absorption levels in the range of 0.2% to 4% for coarse aggregate and 0.2 to 2% for fine aggregate. However, some aggregates have absorption levels above these values. As the porosity of concrete is related to the porosity of both the cement paste and the aggregate and the carbonation rate is a function, among other things, of the porosity of the material, there is concern about the effect of this high porosity material in achieving good quality concrete from the durability point of view. Thus, the objective of this investigation was to study the carbonation rates of concrete specimens made with high-absorption limestone aggregate. Four different water/cement ratios were used, and cylindrical concrete specimens were exposed to accelerated carbonation. High porosity values were obtained for concrete specimens beyond the expected limits for durable concrete. However, carbonation coefficients related to normal quality concrete were obtained for the lowest water/cement ratio employed suggesting that durable concrete may be obtained with this material despite the high porosity.

1. Introduction

Concrete is the most used material for infrastructure development. However, durability of these structures is one of the main concerns, as the expected service life is approaching more than a hundred years. Among the known durability issues for concrete, corrosion of reinforcing steel is the main problem. In concrete structures, reinforcing steel is protected due to the high alkaline environment provided by the pore solution (pH > 12.5 units). However, it may corrode if the protection is lost. The protection may be lost due to chloride attack or due to the neutralization of the concrete pore solution surrounding the reinforcing steel. This neutralization of the pore solution is also called concrete carbonation. Concrete carbonation is the result of the reaction of hydrated cement compounds with atmospheric CO₂. Carbonation reduces the pH of the concrete pore solution (pH ≈ 8 units), developing uniform corrosion in the reinforcing steel. In places with tropical climate, atmospheric conditions may encourage the CO₂ aggressiveness [1]. However, the carbonation rate depends on several factors [2] such as the type and amount of cement, porosity of the material [3], and amount of pozzolanic additions [4].

The porosity of concrete is related to the porosity of both the cement paste and the aggregate and the proper compaction during casting. The porosity of the cement paste is related to the water/cement ratio and the degree of hydration. From the durability point of view, it is accepted that the porosity of the cement paste is the one that controls the porosity of concrete. According to the literature [5], concrete’s porosity above 15% is an indication of bad quality and below 10% is an indication of good quality.

Normal aggregates used in concrete have absorption levels in the range of 0.2% to 4% for coarse aggregate and 0.2 to 2% for fine aggregate [6]. However, some limestone aggregates have absorption levels above these values [7]. And due to the high-absorption characteristics of the aggregate, concrete made with this material has porosity values above 15%, thus suggesting bad quality concrete from the durability point of view.

One way to prove if this material is suitable for durable concrete structures is by determining the carbonation coefficient of the material. However, as concrete carbonation proceeds at a very low rate, the use of an accelerated carbonation chamber is required.

Therefore, the objective of this investigation was to study the carbonation rates of concrete specimens made with high-absorption limestone aggregate.

2. Methodology

2.1. Specimens and Materials

Four water/cement (w/c) ratios were used (0.80, 0.70, 0.62, and 0.55). The cementitious material was Ordinary Portland Cement with no mineral additions. Crushed limestone of high absorption was used as coarse and fine aggregate (Table 1). Mixtures were designed according to the ACI specifications [8], and casting was made following the ASTM standards (Table 2) [9].

Table 1: Materials properties.

Material
Property
Value

Coarse aggregate
Maximum size

Specific weight
2.4

Lose unit weight
1,180 kg/m³

Compact unit weight
1,290 kg/m³

Absorption
5.5 w/o

Fine aggregate
Specific weight
2.44

Fineness modulus
2.6

Absorption
4.7 w/o

Table 2: Mixture design (kg).

w/c ratio
Water
Cement
Coarse

aggregate
Fine

aggregate

0.80
230
288
749
847

0.70
235
336
749
795

0.62
235
379
749
764

0.55
235
427
749
725

Concrete specimens were cylindrical in shape of different size: 300 mm by 150 mm for compressive strength tests, 200 mm by 100 mm for porosity tests, and 150 mm by 75 mm for carbonation tests. After casting, the curing period consisted of 28 days of water immersion. Once cured, the specimens were allowed to condition at lab environment prior to undergoing accelerated testing. The conditioning period was 80 days. Following conditioning, the specimens were placed in a 4% CO₂ environment in order to accelerate the carbonation process for ~100 days, except for mixture 0.55 that was exposed for 176 days.

2.2. Carbonation Depth Measurements

The progress of the carbonation depth was determined by spraying a 1% phenolphthalein solution on top of a freshly broken concrete surface following the RILEM criteria [10]. For each determination, two specimens were removed from the carbonation chamber per w/c. After that, an ~50 mm slice was split from each specimen using a chisel and a hammer. After applying the acid-base indicator, the measurements were performed using a digital caliper. Eight measurements were taken in the more suitable half cylinder as the cuts were irregular. Each measurement was corrected from radial measurements in a cylinder into carbonation depth measurements that would be obtained in a semi-infinite plane [3]. Once corrected, the average was obtained for each cylinder, and the result was averaged with the result from the other cylinder, obtaining an average from each pair of cylinders. After taking the carbonation measurements, the remaining portion of the concrete cylinders was placed back in the chamber.

In addition, a first carbonation depth measurement was performed using the external control specimens. This test was made after the conditioning period was finished and prior to placing the specimens in the carbonation chamber in order to determine the progress of the carbonation front during the conditioning period. In turn, the first carbonation depth measurement was used to correct the carbonation coefficient during the accelerated carbonation period.

3. Results

Table 3 shows the results from the compressive strength, porosity tests, and fresh concrete slump. The compressive strength results were above the nominal values, particularly for 0.80 w/c mixture. The porosity values were high, however, in the expected range for the type of high-absorption aggregate used and with little difference among the different mixtures [7]. Concrete slump was in the expected range of 10 cm ± 2; however, 0.55 w/c mixture had the smallest slump, and 0.62 w/c mixture had the highest.

Table 3: Concrete properties.

w/c ratio
Designed strength MPa
Compressive strength

MPa
Volumetric weight kg/m³
Air

%
Slump

cm
Porosity

%

0.80
15
18.0
2,120
2.8
10
23.4

0.70
20
21.7
2,120
2.8
10
23.1

0.62
25
26.1
2,120
2.9
11
24.1

0.55
30
30.9
2,160
2.9
9
22.9

Table 4 shows the results from the carbonation depth measurements. As the diameter was 75 mm, the specimens were fully carbonated when the carbonation depth was 37.5 mm. Due to the fact that mixture 0.55 was a better mixture than the others, carbonation depth was not determined at 51 days but at 112 days, instead. By day 51, mixtures 0.7 and 0.8 were fully carbonated.

Table 4: Carbonation depth measurements and standard deviations (mm).

Mixture
Days of exposure at 4% CO₂

15
37
51
112

0.80
15.7
1.0
37.5
—
—
—

0.70
13.7
1.6
24.2
1.4
37.5
—
—

0.62
10.8
1.3
20.2
1.3
23.1
1.0
n.d.

0.55
7.8
1.2
14.6
1.4
n.d.
22.3
1.3

4. Discussion

From the data in Table 4, the average carbonation coefficients at 4% CO₂ were estimated. The data is presented in Table 5. Usually, carbonation is modeled as

where is the time of exposure, is the carbonation depth at time , and is the carbonation coefficient. However, when initial carbonation exists previous to accelerated carbonation, then, the carbonation coefficient at 4% CO₂ may be obtained from [3]

where is the time of accelerated exposure, is the carbonation depth at time , and is the initial carbonation depth measured after the conditioning period. The average carbonation coefficient was obtained from

Table 5: Carbonation coefficients from accelerated and natural exposure (mm/).

Mixture

0.80
8.4
11.4

0.70
8.2
9.1

0.62
6.7
7.1

0.55
4.8
5.1

Carbonation coefficient has been modeled using the CO₂ diffusion coefficient in concrete (), the CO₂ concentration (), and the concentration of hydrated calcium compounds () [3]:

In the event of experiments with two different external CO₂ concentrations (, ) using separate specimens of the same concrete mixture, the time to reach a given carbonation depth in both specimens would be, for concentration ,

and, for ,

thus, solving for ,

solving for ,

from (4) and (7),

substituting (8) in (9),

solving for ,

and then, the average carbonation coefficients obtained in (3) were converted to atmospheric carbonation coefficient () using (11):

where and are the atmospheric and CO₂ concentrations, respectively.

The atmospheric carbonation coefficients are also presented in Table 5. According to the literature [5], carbonation coefficients above 6 mm/year1/2 are representative of low quality concrete and carbonation coefficients below 3 mm/year1/2 are representative of high quality concrete. The carbonation coefficients were above 6 mm/year1/2 for specimens from mixtures 0.80, 0.70, and 0.62, suggesting low quality concrete from the durability point of view but as expected when using the w/c ratios employed. However, carbonation coefficients related to normal quality concrete were obtained for the lowest w/c ratio employed, suggesting that durable concrete may be obtained with this material despite the high porosity.

Thus, despite the high porosity of the concrete mixtures, enough compressive strength was obtained and the carbonation coefficients were consistent with the compressive strength’s quality of the material.

5. Conclusions

(i)High porosity values for concrete, above 22%, were obtained when using high-absorption aggregates.(ii)Designed compressive strength was achieved up to 30 MPa despite the use of high-absorption aggregates.(iii)Carbonation coefficients related to normal quality concrete were obtained for concrete mixtures of 0.55 water/cement ratio when using high-absorption aggregates.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the partial support from CONACyT (Grant J34433-U) and Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán in several stages of this investigation. The opinions and findings of this investigation are those of the author and are not necessarily those of the supporting organizations. The author is indebted to J. Cob, G. Domínguez, F. Duarte, and W. Castillo for performing some of the tests reported in the paper.

References

L. Véleva, P. Castro, G. Hernández-Duque, and M. Schorr, “The corrosion performance of steel and reinforced concrete in a tropical humid climate: a review,” Corrosion Reviews, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 235–284, 1998.

R. F. M. Baker, “Initiation period,” in Corrosion of Steel in Concrete, p. 22, Schiessl, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 1988.

E. I. Moreno, Carbonation of blended cement concretes [Ph.D. dissertation], University of South Florida, 1999.

E. I. Moreno and A. A. Sagüés, Carbonation-Induced Corrosion on Blended-Cement Concrete Mix Designs for Highway Structures, NACE International, Houston, Tex, USA, 1998, CORROSION/98, paper no. 636.

O. Trocónis-Rincón, A. Romero-Carruyo, C. Andrade, P. Helene, and I. Díaz, Manual for Inspecting, Evaluating and Diagnosing Corrosion in Reinforced Concrete Structures, CYTED, Maracaibo, Venezuela, 2000.

S. H. Kosmatka and W. C. Panarese, Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Ill, USA, 14th edition, 2002.

R. Solís-Carcaño and E. I. Moreno, “Evaluation of concrete made with crushed limestone aggregate based on ultrasonic pulse velocity,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1225–1231, 2008.

Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete, ACI 211.1-91, ACI International, Farmington Hills, Mich, USA, 1997.

Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory, ASTM C 192-98, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa, USA, 2002.

“CPC-18 measurement of hardened concrete carbonation depth,” Materials and Structures, vol. 21, pp. 453–455, 1988.