Advances in Urology
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 5056049, 4 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5056049

Research Article

Pattern of Ureteric Pathology Presenting to a Fistula Centre in Western Kenya

Anthony Wanjala,¹ Henry Mwangi,² and Hillary Mabeya³

¹Malava County Hospital, Kakamega, P.O. Box 1561-50200, Bungoma, Kenya
²Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, P.O. Box 3-30100, Eldoret, Kenya
³Department of Reproductive Health, Moi University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 3900-30100, Eldoret, Kenya

Correspondence should be addressed to Anthony Wanjala; anthonynakhisa@gmail.com

Received 21 December 2017; Accepted 14 March 2018; Published 24 April 2018

Academic Editor: Miroslav Djordjevic

Copyright © 2018 Anthony Wanjala et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Background. Ureteric pathology arises from surgical misadventures, trauma, and congenital anomalies. Early detection and treatment is of the essence. Objectives. To determine the types/etiology and outcome of ureteric pathology presenting to Gynocare Fistula Centre, Eldoret, Kenya. Methods. Descriptive retrospective study that evaluated patients presenting with ureteric pathology at Gynocare between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2016. We pulled out patient charts and extracted and analyzed relevant data using STATA 13E statistical software. Results. We analyzed 33 charts, and their age ranged from 10 to 58 years. Annual proportion for 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 was 2.5%, 2.8%, 1.2%, 1.4%, and 3.0% respectively among all the fistula patients treated in the hospital. All the patients presented with urinary incontinence, and 7 (21.2%) had flank pain. Iatrogenic injuries contributed 84.8% (28), and 3 (9.1%) were congenital while trauma and infection had 1 each. Of those resulting from surgical misadventures, 17 (60.7%) were from obstetric while 11 (39.2%) were from gynecological surgery. All the injuries were in the distal third of the ureter; 5 were bilateral; and 11 were left sided while 17 were right-sided. Repair and/or reimplantation was successful in 31 (93.93%) of the patients. Conclusion. Highest proportion of ureteric pathologies was accounted for by iatrogenic causes and surgical repair and/or reimplantation has a high success rate.

1. Introduction

Ureteric pathology may arise from abdominal and pelvic surgery, trauma, congenital anomalies, malignancies, and radiation. Iatrogenic causes, though rare, account for most of the ureteric pathology [1]. The location of the ureter in the retroperitoneal space and its close proximity to the pelvic reproductive organs make it susceptible to injury during surgery [2]. Congenital anomalies of the ureter rarely occur alone and are likely to be accompanied by other anomalies on the urinary tree [3].

If not diagnosed and treated early, ureteric pathology is associated with worsening morbidity, including delayed hospital stay, risk of reoperation, compromise of the initial surgery, infection, ureterovaginal fistula, and loss of kidney function [4]. This is in addition to the psychological trauma felt by the patient and the possible risk of litigation. Patients may present with flank pain, urinary incontinence, fever, ascites, prolonged ileus, anuria, and even hydronephrosis and dysfunctional kidneys [5].

High index of suspicion and early diagnosis is of the essence in mitigating the effects of the resulting morbidities [6]. In the event of injury, several authors have demonstrated that early detection and treatment is associated with better short-term and long-term outcomes [2, 7].

In our set up, patients presenting with ureteric pathology are likely to be referred to a urologist if they are male, a fistula surgeon if they are female, and a pediatric surgeon in the event of children. Every so often, these subspecialties work together on select cases.

There exist gaps in published research on the extent of ureteric pathology in this region. The study set out to describe types/etiology and outcome of ureteric pathology presenting to a fistula centre in Western Kenya.

2. Methods

This was a descriptive retrospective study that evaluated all patients who presented with ureteric pathology at Gynocare Fistula Centre from 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2016. Located in Eldoret town on the Western part of Kenya, Gynocare is the biggest fistula referral centre in Kenya, with a bed capacity of 74. Every year the hospital performs over 300 fistula-related surgeries and manages many others conservatively. In 2014, the centre was accredited by WHO (World Health Organization) through FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) to train upcoming fistula surgeons. Since then, a total of 7 surgeons have been trained and certified while many others have visited to gain experience in specific areas.

The study population included all women with a diagnosis of ureteric pathology admitted at Gynocare center for a period of 5 years (from 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2016).

Patients’ medical records were retrieved from the records department, and relevant data were extracted and entered on to chart review forms. This included information on bio-data, presenting symptoms, examination findings, diagnosis, presurgical evaluation, treatment offered, and condition at discharge. Presurgical evaluation included dye studies, kidney function tests, and abdominopelvic ultrasound. Where there was need, examination-under-anesthesia was done. Findings at surgery were also captured, including the type and location of ureteric pathology, comorbidities, and the surgical intervention chosen by the surgeon.

Data analysis was done using STATA 13E statistical software. Descriptive statistics were done to explore and summarize the data. Categorical data were summarized through frequency and proportions and presented in tables and charts, while numerical data were summarized using measures of central tendency and dispersion.

We sought approval from the Gynocare administration and scientific committee.

We used deidentifiers to code the review forms.

3. Results

3.1. Demographics

A total of 33 patients were admitted to Gynocare with ureteric pathology between 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2016. All were female, and their age ranged from 10 years to 58 years with a mean of 36.8 (SD 12) years and a median of 41 (IQR 14). Peak age incidence was in the age range 40–49 years (Figure 1). Slightly above half 18 (54.6%) were referrals, where majority 10 (58.8%) of these were referred by community health workers and 7 (41.2%) were referred from other health facilities (Table 1). Median duration of symptoms was 0.25 years (IQR 8.9) with minimum being 0.019 (1 week) and maximum 17 years.

Figure 1: Age distribution.

Table 1: Age, referral status, and clinical presentation.

Variable
Categories
Frequency
Percentage

Age
<20 years
3
9.1

≥20 years
30
90.9

Referral
No
15
45.5

Yes
18
54.5

Referral from
Other health facilities
7
38.9

Community health workers
10
55.6

Self-referral
1
0.056

Incontinence
No
0
0

Yes
33
100

Flank pain
No
26
78.8

Yes
7
21.2

3.2. Presentation, Annual Proportion, and Etiology

All the patients complained of urinary incontinence at presentation while only 7 (21.2%) presented with flank pain (Table 1). Other complains included abdominal pain, amenorrhea, and per vaginal discharge.

The annual proportion of patients presenting with ureteric pathology against all the other fistula patients never exceeded 3% for the years 2012–2016, the highest, 3% coming in 2016 (Table 2). This is despite a steady rise in the number of fistula surgeries from 2012 to 2016.

Table 2: Ureteric pathology annual proportion.

Year
Frequency
Total fistula
Proportion (%)

2012
5
200
2.5

2013
8
285
2.8

2014
4
325
1.2

2015
5
348
1.4

2016
11
372
3.0

Total
33

At 84.8%, ureteric injuries from surgical misadventures contributed the highest percentage of pathologies, with obstetric accounting for 17 (60.7%) and gynecological surgeries accounting for 11 (39.3%) (Table 3). Of the remaining, 3 (9.1%) patients had congenital malformations while trauma and infection contributed 1 each. In the congenital malformation category, 2 had left sided double ureter with one opening through the vagina while the other had a normal right ureter opening into the urethra. All the pathologies were in the distal third of the ureter, 5 (15.2%) were bilateral, 11 (33.3%) left sided while 17 (51.5%) were right-sided.

Table 3: Etiology of ureteric pathology.

Variable
Categories
Frequency
Percentage

Cause
Previous surgery
28
84.8

Congenital
3
9.1

Trauma
1
3.0

PID
1
3.0

Surgery type
Gynecology
11
39.3

Obstetric
17
60.7

3.3. Renal Function Tests

As a diagnostic and presurgical evaluation, all patients underwent a mandatory renal function and electrolyte test upon presentation. They were largely within the reference range, save for 1 (3.3%) who had elevated creatinine, urea and potassium and another who had elevated creatinine with normal urea and potassium (Table 4). Presurgical renal function tests for 3 patients could not be traced. Prior to discharge, the lab works were repeated and all were within reference ranges.

Table 4: Renal function at admission.

Variable
Categories
Frequency
Percentage

Urea
<3.0
14
46.7

3.00–8.39
15
50.0

>8.39
1
3.3

K
3.40–5.10
29
96.7

>5.10
1
3.3

Creatinine
44.00–133.00
28
93.3

>133.00
2
6.7

3.4. Management

Surgical intervention was the management of choice for all the 33 patients (Table 5). Slightly over half had ureteroneocystostomy while close to one-third had both ureteroneocystostomy and fistula repair. The remaining two patients had repair. Upon discharge, 2 patients still had urinary incontinence and were asked to come back for reoperation later. One presented to another fistula centre for repair while the other was lost to follow-up. Median time of hospitalization was 17 days (IQR 2), with minimum being 14 days and maximum 48 days. Postoperatively, there was no reported mortality or severe morbidity.

Table 5: Treatment offered.

Variable
Categories
Frequency
Percentage

Was surgery offered
No
0
0

Yes
33
100

Type of surgery done
Repair
2
6.1

Ureteroneocystostomy
21
63.6

Repair + ureteroneocystostomy
10
30.3

Discharge condition
Leaking urine
2
6.1

Not leaking urine
31
93.9

4. Discussion

Ureteric pathology can lead to serious morbidity and mortality if not detected early and treated. Among the leading causes of this is inadvertent ureteric injury during surgery [8, 9].

In the female pelvis, the ureter lies close to the uterus and the cervix making it susceptible to injury during either gynecological or obstetric surgeries [10]. As such, lower third ureteric injuries, just like in this study, are the commonest, probably from dissection of lower uterus and cervix or from injury during ligation of uterine vessels. It is thought that as high as 50–75% of these injuries arise from gynecological procedures [5], while the rest are largely from obstetric causes. This is well demonstrated in this study as about 89% of all ureteric pathology resulted from surgical misadventures, majority being obstetric (60%). Obstetric surgeries associated with ureteric injury include cesarean section, repair of uterine rupture, and cesarean hysterectomy. Advancement in labor management and monitoring has led to an increase in the CS rate the world over. In Kenya, most of these are done by relatively junior doctors due to acute shortage of specialists. This may account for the cases of ureteric injury from obstetric causes as less surgical experience is a risk factor to injury [11]. Gynecological procedures associated with ureteric injury include total abdominal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy, removal of pelvic masses, oophorectomy, suspension procedures, and so on.

The annual proportion of 3% or less cannot be easily compared with other studies because they have used total hospital surgeries as the baseline whereas this study uses total fistula surgeries as the baseline, an obvious bias. Nevertheless with such annual proportion at a referral centre it is safe to say ureteric pathology is not common.

The fact that all patients presented with urinary incontinence points to a likelyhood of ureterovaginal fistula which in this case is protective to the kidneys. This may explain why for most patients their renal function tests were within reference ranges despite some having had the pathology for a long duration. Ureteric injury without incontinence may lead to leakage of urine into the peritoneum with attendant peritonitis or loss of kidney function in the event of ureteric ligation [6].

The left ureter is more liable to injury due to slight uterine rotation [12, 13]. This contrasts somewhat with this study where slightly more than half of patients had right-sided pathology, majority of who were iatrogenic.

Surgical intervention has proven to be key in the treatment of patients with ureteric pathology [1]. In this, high index of suspicion, early diagnosis, and timely treatment offer patients the best chance of recovery. The surgical options available include ureteroneocystostomy with or without psoas hitch and/or boari flap, ureteroneocystostomy, end to end anastomosis, primary repair when there is partial resection, and suture removal in the event of ligation among others. Surgery offered cure for 31 (94%) of patients in this study.

5. Conclusion

Iatrogenic injury is the commonest cause of ureteric pathology, from either obstetric or gynecological surgeries. The close association between reproductive organs and the ureter makes it more liable to injury. Surgical intervention has a high success rate.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of the research assistants Steve Katumo and Joan Migosi to the success of this study. The authors also wish to acknowledge the Gynocare administration for allowing them to carry out this research in their institution.

References

H. A. Mahendran, P. Singam, C. Ho, G. E. Hong, T. G. Hee, and Z. M. Zainuddin, “Iatrogenic ureter injuries : eleven years experience in a tertiary hospital,” Medical Journal of Malaysia, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 169–172, 2012.

M. Rafique and M. H. Arif, “Management of iatrogenic ureteric injuries associated with gynecological surgery,” International Urology and Nephrology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2002.

A. H. Al-Salem, “Congenital urological malformations,” in An Illustrated Guide to Pediatric Urology, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2017.

J. D. Watterson, J. E. Mahoney, N. G. Futter, and J. Gaffield, “Iatrogenic ureteric injuries: approaches to etiology and management,” Canadian Journal of Surgery, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 379–382, 1998.

P. L. Chalya, A. N. Massinde, A. Kihunrwa, and S. Simbila, “Iatrogenic ureteric injuries following abdomino-pelvic operations: a 10-year tertiary care hospital experience in Tanzania,” World Journal of Emergency Surgery, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 17, 2015.

J. Mensah, G. Klufio, F. Ahiaku, C. Osafo, and S. Gepi-Attee, “Delayed recognition of bilateral ureteral injury after gyneacological surgery,” Ghana Medical Journal, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 133–136, 2008.

M. S. Anwar, M. Tariq, K. Saeed, T. Ghafoor, and G. M. Mustafa, “Causes of ureteric injuries and outcome of different surgical procedures for the repair of ureter,” Journal of Sheikh Zayed Medical College, vol. 1, pp. 16–20, 2010.

K. H. Tijani, K. I. Onwuzurigbo, R. W. Ojewola, B. B. Afolabi, and N. O. Akanmu, “Iatrogeni ureteric injuries in a nigerian teaching hospital-experience in the last decade,” East African Medical Journal, vol. 88, no. 9, 2011.

S. N. Durrani, A Ur Rehman, S. Khan, H. Ullah, M. K. Khan, and A. Ullah, “Ureteral trauma during open surgery: aetiology, presentation and management,” Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, vol. 25, no. 3-4, pp. 3–43, 2013.

R. Fröber, “Surgical anatomy of the ureter,” BJU International, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 949–965, 2007.

F. T. Hammad, K. M. AlQaiwani, and S. S. Shirodkar, “The role of urologists in the management of urological injuries during obstetric and gynaecologic surgery,” International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1237–1241, 2010.

A. E. Aghaji and C. Odoemene, “Ureteric injuries in Enugu, Nigeria,” East African Medical Journal, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 184–188, 1999.

I. Nnabugwu and O. Amu, “Iatrogenic ureteric injuries complicating open obstetric and gynaecologic operations in South East Nigeria-case series,” Journal of the West African College of Surgeons, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 98–108, 2011.