Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 8459638, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8459638

Research Article

Hydrothermal Synthesis, Structural Characterization, and Interaction Mechanism with DNA of Copper(II) Complex Containing 2,2′-Bipyridine

Ting Liu, Yi-An Wang, Qing Zang, and Guo-Qing Zhong

School of Material Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Guo-Qing Zhong; zgq316@163.com

Received 28 February 2018; Accepted 8 April 2018; Published 22 May 2018

Academic Editor: Concepción López

Copyright © 2018 Ting Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

A Cu(II) complex [Cu(bipy)(H₂O)₂(SO₄)]n (bipy = 2,2′-bipyridine) was synthesized by hydrothermal method and characterized structurally by elemental analyses, single crystal X-ray diffraction, infrared spectra, and thermogravimetry and differential scanning calorimetry. The Cu(II) was hexacoordinated by two N atoms from bipy, two O atoms from different sulfate radical anions, and two O atoms from two water molecules, forming a slightly distorted octahedral geometry, and bridged by sulfato groups into polymeric chains. Under the condition of physiological pH, the interaction mechanism between the complex and hsDNA was explored with acridine orange as a fluorescence probe by spectroscopic methods. The binding modes between the complex and hsDNA were the electrostatic and embedded modes.

1. Introduction

Design and synthesis of organometallic complexes have become an active research area because of their novel topologies, fascinating functionalities, special properties, and potential applications, such as biomedical utilization, multifunctional materials, molecular adsorption, gas storage, catalysis, magnetism, and so on [1–6]. Chemists have synthesized many organic-inorganic hybrid materials with nitrogen heterocyclic compounds as organic building blocks [7–10]. Trace element copper plays an important role in endogenous oxidative DNA damage associated with aging and cancer [11, 12]. Cu(II) complexes have many bioactivities such as antitumor [13, 14], antimicrobial [15–17], and oxidation of ascorbic acid in the presence of oxygen [18]. In addition, Cu(II) complexes can bind to DNA through noncovalent and covalent interactions [19]. Many researchers found that Cu(II) complexes had potential in the treatment of cancers and other diseases [20]. 2,2′-Bipyridine is a potential antitumor agent and often acts as ancillary ligand to strengthen the binding ability of a complex through enhancing the molecule planarity [21]. The complexes of 2,2′-bipyridine and its derivatives have been reported by a number of authors [22, 23]. The method of hydrothermal synthesis has been used to produce various solids, such as oxide ceramics, microporous crystals, metal complexes, nanomaterials, and so forth [24–29]. In particular, the molecular structures obtained by this method are unexpected compared with those obtained by the common solution method [30].

The modes of noncovalent interaction for metal complexes with DNA include intercalation, electrostatic effect, groove binding, and so on, and the effectiveness mainly depends on the binding modes and affinities between complexes and DNA [31–34]. There is continuing interest in some metal complexes that interact with DNA [35]. Furthermore, the studies of interaction of metal coordination polymers with DNA have been of great interest [36, 37]. However, examples of such metal coordination polymers are still few. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore the binding modes of DNA with metal coordination polymers containing rigid ligands.

We herein report the X-ray single crystal structure, Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR), and thermogravimetry and differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC) of the Cu(II) complex containing 2,2′-bipyridine, which is synthesized by hydrothermal method, and explore its bioactivities with herring sperm DNA (hsDNA) using acridine orange (AO) as a fluorescence probe by spectral methods.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

All chemicals were of analytical reagents and used as received without further purification. 2,2′-Bipyridine and AO were purchased from Alfa Aesar, and copper sulfate pentahydrate and other reagents were purchased from Merck. The hsDNA was purchased from Sigma Biological Co., its purity was monitored by the ratio of absorbance at 260–280 nm, and the ratio of 1.8–1.9 indicated that the hsDNA was free from protein. The hsDNA was dissolved in double-distilled water with 50 mmol·L⁻¹ sodium chloride and dialyzed at 4°C for 48 h [38]. The hsDNA concentration was measured by UV-Vis at 260 nm. Tris-HCl buffer solution (pH 7.40) was prepared by using triple-distilled water.

2.2. Physical Measurements

The C, H, and N in the complex were analyzed with a Vario EL CUBE elemental analyzer, and the copper was determined by EDTA titration. FTIR spectra were obtained with KBr pellets on a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum One-Spectrometer in the range 4000–400 cm⁻¹. The thermal analysis was performed by a SDT Q600 thermogravimetric analyzer from 30 to 800°C at a heating rate of 10°C·min⁻¹ under air flow of 100 mL·min⁻¹. UV-Vis spectra in Tris-HCl buffer solution (pH 7.40) were measured with a Unico spectrophotometer (UV-2102) in the range 200–600 nm. Fluorescence spectra were recorded on a PE LS-55 spectrofluorophotometer. Viscosities were measured with an Ubbelohde capillary viscometer having diameters of 0.40–0.50 nm and 0.50–0.60 nm, respectively. The viscometers were selected on the basis of the flow time of the complex, and the flow time was at least 120 s.

2.3. Synthesis of the Title Complex

2,2′-Bipyridine (0.2 mmol, 31.7 mg) and NaOH (0.2 mmol, 8.0 mg) were dissolved in a minimum amount of distilled water. Copper sulfate (0.2 mmol, 51.3 mg) was added to the above solution, and the volume of the mixed solution was increased to 18 mL with distilled water. The mixture was transferred to a 30 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel reactor and heated to 140°C for 72 h, and then, it was cooled at a rate of 10°C·h⁻¹ to room temperature. Blue stick single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained. The crystals were washed by a small amount of distilled water and anhydrous ethanol and dried naturally (yield 84%). Anal. Calc. (%) for CuC₁₀H₁₂N₂O₆S: C, 34.14; H, 3.44; N, 7.96; Cu, 18.06. Found (%): C, 34.12; H, 3.30; N, 7.77; Cu 18.14.

2.4. X-Ray Crystallography

A blue crystal with dimensions 0.374 mm × 0.199 mm × 0.117 mm was installed on a Bruker Apex II CCD diffractometer with graphite monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). Diffraction data were collected at 296(2) K in the θ range 3.273–27.639°. The programs of the SHELXL-97 and SHELXTL-97 were used for the structure determination and refinement [39, 40]. The structure was solved by direct methods, and all nonhydrogen atoms were obtained from the difference Fourier map and subjected to anisotropic refinement by full-matrix least squares on F². Crystallographic data have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC, UK. Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge on quoting the depository CCDC-1028718 for the title complex (deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk).

2.5. Procedures of Biological Activity

The experimental methods of biological activity were mainly referred to [38, 41]. The specimens for absorption and fluorescence were obtained through diluting the stock solutions of the title complex (abbreviated as Cu-bipy) and hsDNA with Tris-HCl buffer solution to the required concentrations. Under the condition of the fixed Cu-bipy concentration and changing only the hsDNA concentration, the spectra of UV-Vis and fluorescence were tested with the quartz cuvettes of 1 cm. The excitation wavelength of the fluorescence measurement was 411.7 nm.

The samples of viscosity measurement were filled into the cleaned and dried viscometers. A thermostat was used to keep the temperature constant with the deviations within ±0.01°C. Double-distilled water was used in the calibration experiments, and the viscosity of pure water was derived from Lange’s Handbook of Chemistry [42]. The time was recorded on a digital stopwatch with the deviations within ±0.01 s, and the average deviation of the three experimental results was within ±0.2 s. The hsDNA of 1.0 × 10⁻⁵ mol·L⁻¹ was mixed with different concentrations of Cu-bipy. The flow time was recorded at 20 ± 0.1°C after the reaction mixture was placed in the darkness for 0.5 h. The relative viscosities of hsDNA were measured with molar ratio (r = c(Cu-bipy)/c(hsDNA)) from 0.0 to 4.0 at atmospheric pressure and 15°C ambient temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Crystal Structure Analysis

The molecular structure diagram of the complex is shown in Figure 1. The crystallographic data and structure refinement parameters are given in Table 1, and the selected bond distances and angles are shown in Table 2.

Figure 1: Molecular structure of the title complex.

Table 1: Crystal data and structure refinement parameters for the title complex.

Empirical formula
CuC₁₀H₁₂O₆N₂S

Formula weight (g·mol⁻¹)
351.82

Temperature (K)
296(2)

Wavelength (Å)
0.71073

Crystal system
Monoclinic

Space group
C2/c

a (Å)
15.1279(7)

b (Å)
12.4488(6)

c (Å)
6.9987(3)

β (°)
105.9576(13)

V (Å³)
1267.23(10)

Z
4

Calculated density (g·cm⁻³)
1.844

Absorption coefficient (mm⁻¹)
1.916

F(000)
716

Crystal size (mm³)
0.374 × 0.199 × 0.117

θ range for data collection (°)
3.273–27.639

Index ranges
−19 ≤ h ≤ 19, −16 ≤ k ≤ 16, −9 ≤ l ≤ 8

Reflections collected/unique
9535

Data/restraints/parameters
1473/3/97

Goodness of fit on F²
0.974

Final R indices (I > 2σ (I))
R₁ = 0.0226, wR₂ = 0.0579

R indices (all data)
R₁ = 0.0238, wR₂ = 0.0589

Largest differential peak and hole (e·Å⁻³)
0.356 and −0.442

Table 2: Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) for the title complex.

Cu(1)–O(1)
1.9728(11)

Cu(1)–O(1)#1
1.9728(11)

Cu(1)–N(1)
1.9947(12)

Cu(1)–N(1)#1
1.9948(13)

Cu(1)–O(2)
2.455

Cu(1)–O(2)#1
2.455

O(1)#1–Cu(1)–O(1)
93.07(7)

O(1)#1–Cu(1)–N(1)
93.11(5)

O(1)–Cu(1)–N(1)
172.31(5)

O(1)#1–Cu(1)–N(1)#1
172.31(5)

O(1)–Cu(1)–N(1)#1
93.11(5)

N(1)–Cu(1)–N(1)#1
81.12(7)

O(2)–Cu(1)–O(1)
85.52

O(2)–Cu(1)–O(1)#1
92.25

O(2)–Cu(1)–N(1)
89.66

O(2)–Cu(1)–N(1)#1
92.79

O(2)–Cu(1)–O(2)#1
176.77

O(2)#1–Cu(1)–O(1)
92.25

O(2)#1–Cu(1)–N(1)
92.97

O(2)#1–Cu(1)–N(1)#1
89.66

O(2)#1–Cu(1)–O(1)#1
85.52

Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: #1−x + 2, y, −z + 1/2; #2−x + 2, y, −z + 3/2.

The unit of the complex is composed of one Cu(II), one 2,2′-bipyridine, two water molecules, and one sulfate radical anion. The Cu(II) is hexacoordinated by two O atoms from the coordinated water molecules and two pyridyl N atoms from bipy which are located at equatorial sites and two O atoms from different bidentate bridging sulfato groups which are located at axial positions. The coordination configuration is a slightly distorted octahedron, and the Cu(II) is bridged by sulfato groups into polymeric chains. The distances of Cu–O with the aqua ligands and the sulfato group are 1.9728 and 2.455 Å, respectively, and the distances of Cu–N are 1.9947 Å. Because of Jahn–Teller effect of Cu(II) with d⁹ electron configuration, the axial distances of Cu(1)–O(2) and Cu(1)–O(2)#1 are stretched. As shown in Figure 2, the generated chains extend along (001) plane direction, and the crossing of the chelate bipy forms the polymeric chains formulated as [Cu(bipy)(H₂O)₂(SO₄)]n. In Figure 3, the molecular structure shows the existence of face-to-face π–π stacking weak interaction. The interplanar distances of 3.495–3.627 Å between two adjacent mirror planes of bipy are normal for weak π–π interaction. The hydrogen bond lengths and bond angles are given in Table 3, and the molecules of the complex are linked together by intermolecular hydrogen bonds. It is obvious that the formation of the interchain hydrogen bonds is related to the layers parallel to the (100) plane. A weak hydrogen bond with d(C⋯O) = 3.282 Å is formed between the outer C–H bonds of one chain and the coordinated sulfato O atoms of the adjacent chain, and the chains are stabilized by interchain π–π interaction and interchain C–H⋯O hydrogen bonds [23]. Each water molecule in the complex nearly forms a linear intrachain and interchain hydrogen bonds with the uncoordinated sulfato O atoms.

Figure 2: Crystal packing diagram of the title complex.

Figure 3: Weak π–π stacking interactions of the title complex.

Table 3: Hydrogen bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) for the title complex.

D–H⋯A
d(D–H)
d(H⋯A)
d(D⋯A)
∠DHA

O(1)–H(1W)⋯O(3)#3
0.852(9)
1.843(11)
2.6763(16)
165.4(19)

O(1)–H(1W)⋯S(1)#3
0.852(9)
2.926(16)
3.6599(12)
145.4(18)

C(5)–H(5)⋯O(1)#1
0.93
2.50
3.026(2)
115.9

C(2)–H(2)⋯O(2)#4
0.93
2.43
3.282(2)
152.1

O(1)–H(1)⋯O(3)#1
0.82
1.81
2.6198(16)
169.5

O(1)–H(1)⋯S(1)#5
0.82
2.74
3.4143(11)
140.8

Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: #1−x + 2, y, −z + 1/2; #2−x + 2, y, −z + 3/2; #3−x + 2, −y + 1, −z + 1; #4−x + 2, −y + 2, −z + 1; #5x, y, z−1.

3.2. FTIR Spectroscopy

The FTIR spectrum of the complex is shown in Figure 4. Few number of the absorption bands in the FTIR spectrum means that the symmetry of the complex is very good. A wide intense absorption band around 3428 cm⁻¹ is due to stretching vibration of hydroxyl [43, 44]. This indicates that there are the coordinated water or lattice water molecules in the complex. The band corresponding to the stretching vibration of the cumulative double bond (C=C–C=C) of pyridine ring is situated at 2328 cm⁻¹. The absorption peaks at 1651 and 1444 cm⁻¹ are assigned to the stretching vibrations of the C=N and C=C bonds, respectively [45].

Figure 4: FTIR spectrum of the title complex.

As a free anion, sulfate has tetrahedral symmetry, whereas, if sulfate forms a bidentate binuclear (bridging) complex, the symmetry is lowered and the band splits into two bands [46]. As shown in Figure 4, the FTIR spectrum of the complex makes out peaks at 1169 and 1082 cm⁻¹. The absorption peaks around 928 and 775 cm⁻¹ are assigned to the rocking and wagging vibrations of the hydroxyl, which indicate the existence of the coordinated water molecules in the complex [47]. As a result of the formation of the Cu–N bond, the corresponding C–N bond becomes so weak that disappeared in the FTIR spectrum [48]. The absorption peaks at 553 and 466 cm⁻¹ are assigned to the Cu–N bond and Cu–O bond, respectively [49], which agrees with the X-ray crystal structure of the complex.

3.3. Thermal Analysis

The TG-DSC curves of the title complex are shown in Figure 5, and there are one endothermic peak and two exothermic peaks in the DSC curve. The endothermic peak at 169°C is accompanied by obvious mass loss, and the sample loses two H₂O molecules. The experimental mass loss (10.31%) is close to the calculated one (10.24%). Due to the high temperature of water loss, the molecules should be the coordinated water. After the water molecules are lost, the complex becomes [Cu(C₁₀H₈N₂)(SO₄)]. The sequential exothermic peaks at 393 and 423°C in the DSC curve correspond to the oxidation and decomposition of bipy, the decomposition product of this step is CuSO₄, and the mass loss of 43.89% is in agreement with the calculated result of 44.39%. The mass loss remains constant until ca. 800°C, the final remnant mass is 31.86%, and the residue is Cu₂SO₄ (calculated as 31.72%).

Figure 5: TG-DSC curves of the title complex.

3.4. Biological Activity

3.4.1. Binding Ratio

As shown in Figure 6, the UV-Vis spectra were obtained by determination of the Cu-bipy solution with an independent variable of hsDNA concentration. The wavelength which is obtained from Figure 6 and used in the mole ratio method is 214 nm, and the binding ratio [n(Cu-bipy) : n(hsDNA) = 3 : 1] is shown in Figure 7.

Figure 6: Influence of hsDNA on the UV-Vis spectra of Cu-bipy (pH 7.40). From curves 0–15, c(Cu-bipy) = 4.0 × 10⁻⁶ mol·L⁻¹; c(hsDNA) = 0.00, 0.17, 0.33, 0.50, 0.67, 0.83, 1.00, 1.17, 1.33, 1.50, 1.67, 1.83, 2.00, 2.17, 2.33, and 2.50 × 10⁻⁶ mol·L⁻¹, respectively.

Figure 7: Mole ratio plots of Cu-bipy with hsDNA (pH = 7.40, λ = 214 nm), c(Cu-bipy) = 4.0 × 10⁻⁶ mol·L⁻¹.

3.4.2. Double Reciprocal Method

The double reciprocal equation [50] is listed as follows to express the relationship between Cu-bipy and hsDNA:

In (1), c(hsDNA) is the hsDNA concentration, and are the absorbance of Cu-bipy in the presence and lack of hsDNA, respectively, and is the binding constant of hsDNA-Cu-bipy. In Figure 8, 1/c(hsDNA) is used as an abscissa and is used as an ordinate. The binding constants are, respectively, calculated: (295.15 K) = 1.97 × 10⁵ L·mol⁻¹ and (313.15 K) = 1.55 × 10⁴ L·mol⁻¹. As is known to all, there are some ways in which macromolecule bind to small molecule, including hydrogen bond, van der Waals force, hydrophobic force, electrostatic interaction, and so on. According to the following equations, we can calculate a series of thermodynamic parameters (, , and ) to confirm the interaction forces.

where is 295.15 K, is 313.15 K, and and are the standard molar reaction enthalpy and the standard molar reaction Gibbs free energy, respectively. The calculated results in Table 4 indicate that the interaction between Cu-bipy and hsDNA is driven by entropy [51]. The values of and indicate that this is an exothermic reaction, and there is a spontaneous interaction between Cu-bipy and hsDNA.

Figure 8: Double reciprocal plots of hsDNA-Cu-bipy at 295.15 K and 313.15 K (pH 7.40). c(Cu-bipy) = 4.0 × 10⁻⁶ mol·L⁻¹; c(hsDNA) = 0.00, 0.60, 1.20, 1.80, 2.40, 3.00, 3.60, 4.20, 4.80, 5.40, 6.00, 6.60, 7.20, 7.80, and 8.40 × 10⁻⁶ mol·L⁻¹, respectively.

Table 4: Thermodynamic parameters at two different temperatures.

(K)
(L·mol⁻¹)
(J·mol⁻¹)
(J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹)
(J·mol⁻¹)

295.15
1.97 × 10⁵
−3.53 × 10⁴
115.26
−1280

313.15
1.55 × 10⁴
−2.96 × 10⁴
90.44
−1280

3.4.3. Competitive Binding Experiments

AO as a fluorescence probe was widely used to study the binding way between small molecule and DNA [38], and it can embed between two adjacent base pairs of DNA helix and enhance the fluorescence intensity. As the concentration of AO (Cu-bipy) increases, the fluorescence intensity of Cu-bipy-hsDNA (hsDNA-AO) reduces gradually at the maximum wavelength of 528 (531) nm in Figures 9 and 10. The experimental result indicates that the reaction competition between Cu-bipy and AO with hsDNA is conspicuous, and the bonding mode between Cu-bipy and hsDNA mainly includes insertion binding.

Figure 9: Emission spectra of hsDNA-Cu-bipy mixture in different concentrations of AO (pH = 7.40, λex = 411.7 nm). From curves 0–15, c(hsDNA-Cu-bipy) = 1.0 × 10⁻⁵ mol·L⁻¹; c(Cu-bipy) = 0.00, 0.33, 0.67, 1.00, 1.33, 1.67, 2.00, 2.33, 2.67, 3.00, 3.33, 3.67, 4.00, 4.33, 4.67, and 5.00 × 10⁻⁶ mol·L⁻¹, respectively.

Figure 10: Emission spectra of hsDNA-AO mixture in different concentrations of Cu-bipy (pH = 7.40, λex = 411.7 nm). From curves 0–15, c(hsDNA-AO) = 1.0 × 10⁻⁵ mol·L⁻¹; c(Cu-bipy) = 0.00, 0.33, 0.67, 1.00, 1.33, 1.67, 2.00, 2.33, 2.67, 3.00, 3.33, 3.67, 4.00, 4.33, 4.67, and 5.00 × 10⁻⁶ mol·L⁻¹, respectively.

3.4.4. Scatchard Method

The Scatchard equation (3) can be used to study the binding mode between hsDNA and AO with Cu-bipy, whose concentration is gradually changing.

where is the mole number of AO bound per mole of DNA, is the AO concentration, is the binding constant, and is the maximum value of a binding site with AO. Generally, if the value in the absence of Cu-bipy is the same with the presence of Cu-bipy, the binding mode is an insertion mode. If the value in the absence of Cu-bipy is the same with the presence of Cu-bipy, there is noninsertion in the binding mode. If the value is different from the value, the binding mode between Cu-bipy and hsDNA is a mixed mode of noninsertion and insertion binding. The Scatchard plots in the absence and the presence of sodium chloride are shown in Figures 11 and 12, and the data of and are listed in Table 5. It can be seen from Table 5 that both values of and vary with the concentrations of Cu-bipy. The results show the presence of the mixed interaction. The values in the presence of sodium chloride are lower than that of no sodium chloride, and this indicates that there is an electrostatic interaction between Cu-bipy and hsDNA.

Figure 11: Scatchard plots of the interaction between Cu-bipy and hsDNA-AO (pH = 7.40, without NaCl). c(hsDNA) = 1.0 × 10⁻⁵ mol·L⁻¹; Rt = c(Cu-bipy)/c(hsDNA); Rt = a, 0.00; b, 0.40; c, 0.80; d, 1.20.

Figure 12: Scatchard plots of the interaction between Cu-bipy and hsDNA-AO (pH = 7.40, with NaCl). c(hsDNA) = 1.0 × 10⁻⁵ mol·L⁻¹; Rt = c(Cu-bipy)/c(hsDNA); Rt = a, 0.00; b, 0.40; c, 0.80; d, 1.20.

Table 5: Data from the Scatchard equation of the interaction between Cu-bipy and hsDNA.

Curve
c(Cu-bipy)/c(hsDNA)
NaCl (mol·L⁻¹)
Scatchard
(L·mol⁻¹)

a
0.00
0
1173.6–2.44 × 10⁵r
2.44 × 10⁵
4.81 × 10⁻³

0.50
813.4–2.09 × 10⁵r
2.09 × 10⁵
3.89 × 10⁻³

b
0.40
0
1176.5–1.81 × 10⁵r
1.81 × 10⁵
6.50 × 10⁻³

0.50
1241.5–2.20 × 10⁵r
2.20 × 10⁵
5.64 × 10⁻³

c
0.80
0
1441.2–2.25 × 10⁵r
2.25 × 10⁵
6.41 × 10⁻³

0.50
1318.6–2.21 × 10⁵r
2.21 × 10⁵
5.97 × 10⁻³

d
1.20
0
1641.4–2.27 × 10⁵r
2.27 × 10⁵
7.23 × 10⁻³

0.50
1113.9–2.56 × 10⁵r
2.56 × 10⁵
4.35 × 10⁻³

3.4.5. Influence of Phosphate Group

The above conclusion is further demonstrated by the phosphate experiment. If Cu-bipy binds to phosphate radical, then there is an electrostatic interaction between Cu-bipy and hsDNA by changing the Na₂HPO₄ concentration while keeping the Cu-bipy concentration fixed. As shown in Figure 13, when the amounts of Na₂HPO₄ are increased, UV-Vis spectra of Cu-bipy are slightly changed. The result hints that the electrostatic interaction exists between Cu-bipy and hsDNA.

Figure 13: Influence of phosphate on the UV-Vis spectra of Cu-bipy (pH 7.40). c(Cu-bipy) = 1.0 × 10⁻⁵ mol·L⁻¹; c(Na₂HPO₄) = 0.00, 0.33, 0.67, 1.00, 1.33, 1.67, 2.00, 2.33, 2.67, 3.00, 3.33, 3.67, 4.00, 4.33, 4.67, and 5.00 × 10⁻⁵ mol·L⁻¹, respectively.

3.4.6. Viscosity Measurements

The viscosity measurements of complexes at different concentrations can obtain useful data for identifying binding mode [41, 52]. If a micromolecule is inserted in the interspace of base pairs, the DNA helix will be extended because the separated base pairs can accommodate the bound ligand. Conversely, the viscosity will not increase if the binding with DNA is in other ways; the groove binding does not obviously change viscosity, whereas a partial intercalation of the complex causes a bend in the DNA helix, reducing its viscosity [53, 54]. The viscosity was determined by the fixed hsDNA concentration and changing the Cu-bipy concentration in the experiment. In Figure 14, the relative viscosity of hsDNA reveals a consistent decrease during the addition of Cu-bipy, which may be due to partial inserting of the complex. According to the result of viscosity measurement, the interaction between Cu-bipy and hsDNA is in insertion mode.

Figure 14: Effect of increasing amounts of Cu-bipy on the relative viscosity of hsDNA, c(hsDNA) = 1.00 × 10⁻⁴ mol·L⁻¹.

4. Conclusions

The complex [Cu(bipy)(H₂O)₂(SO₄)]n was synthesized by hydrothermal method and characterized by EA, single crystal X-ray diffraction, FTIR, and TG-DSC. The complex crystallizes in the monoclinic system with C2/c space group. The Cu(II) was hexacoordinated by two N atoms and four O atoms, forming a slightly distorted octahedron, and bridged by sulfato groups into polymeric chains. Under the physiological pH, the interaction between the complex and hsDNA was studied with AO as a fluorescent probe by spectral method. The interaction mechanism of the complex with hsDNA is electrostatic and intercalative binding. The calculated thermodynamic parameters indicate that the interaction of the complex and hsDNA is driven by entropy. The influence of phosphate radical and Scatchard method reveals that the complex is combined with hsDNA in the electrostatic and intromittent modes.

Data Availability

Crystallographic data have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK. Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge on quoting the depository CCDC-1028718 for the title complex (Fax: +44-1223-336-033; E-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Scientific Research Funds of Education Department of Sichuan Province (10ZA016) and the Longshan Academic Talent Research Supporting Program of SWUST (17LZX414).

References

K. A. Kounavi, A. A. Kitos, E. E. Moushi et al., “Supramolecular features in the engineering of 3d metal complexes with phenyl-substituted imidazoles as ligands: the case of copper(II),” CrystEngComm, vol. 17, no. 39, pp. 7510–7521, 2015.

K. Soulis, C. Gourlaouen, C. Daniel et al., “New luminescent copper(I) complexes with extended π-conjugation,” Polyhedron, vol. 140, pp. 42–50, 2018.

P. A. Tanner and C. K. Duan, “Luminescent lanthanide complexes: selection rules and design,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 254, no. 23-24, pp. 3026–3029, 2010.

S. Sanram, J. Boonmak, and S. Youngme, “Structural diversity, single-crystal to single-crystal transformation and photocatalytic properties of Cu(II)-metal-organic frameworks based on 1,4-phenylenedipropionic acid,” Inorganica Chimica Acta, vol. 469, pp. 11–19, 2018.

J. Cui, Y. Li, Z. Guo, and H. Zheng, “A porous metal-organic framework based on Zn₆O₂ clusters: chemical stability, gas adsorption properties and solvatochromic behavior,” Chemical Communications, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 555–557, 2013.

R. Yang, H. H. Li, K. V. Hecke, and G. H. Cui, “Cobalt(II) and copper(II) complexes constructed from bis(benzimidazole) and 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylate Co-ligands: synthesis, crystal structures, and catalytic properties,” Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie, vol. 641, no. 3-4, pp. 642–649, 2015.

H. Paul, T. Mukherjee, M. G. B. Drew, and P. Chattopadhyay, “Synthesis, characterization, crystal structure, and DNA-binding of ruthenium(II) complexes of heterocyclic nitrogen ligands resulting from a benzimidazole-based quinazoline derivative,” Journal of Coordination Chemistry, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1289–1302, 2012.

J. Luo, L. Qiu, B. Liu, X. Zhang, F. Yang, and L. Cui, “Synthesis, structure and magnetic properties of two cobalt(II) dicyanamide (dca) complexes with heterocyclic nitrogen donors tetra(2-pyridyl)pyrazine (tppz) and 2,4,6-tri(2-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine (tptz): [Co₂(tppz)(dca)₄]·CH₃CN and [Co(tptz)(dca)(H₂O)](dca),” Chinese Journal of Chemistry, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 522–528, 2012.

W. Levason, G. Reid, and W. Zhang, “Synthesis, properties, and structures of chromium(VI) and chromium(V) complexes with heterocyclic nitrogen Ligands,” Zeitschrift Für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie, vol. 640, no. 1, pp. 35–39, 2014.

J. Devi and N. Batra, “Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activities of mixed ligand transition metal complexes with isatin monohydrazone Schiff base ligands and heterocyclic nitrogen base,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 135, pp. 710–719, 2014.

H. Wu, F. Kou, F. Jia, B. Liu, J. Yuan, and Y. Bai, “Synthesis, characterization, DNA-binding properties, and antioxidant activity of a copper(II) complex with 1,3-bis-(1-allaylbenzimidazol-2-yl)-2-oxopropane,” Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie, vol. 638, no. 2, pp. 443–450, 2012.

X. Qiao, Z.-Y. Ma, C.-Z. Xie et al., “Study on potential antitumor mechanism of a novel Schiff base copper(II) complex: synthesis, crystal structure, DNA binding, cytotoxicity and apoptosis induction activity,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 728–737, 2011.

Y.-M. Ji, Y. Fang, P.-P. Han, M.-X. Li, Q.-Q. Chen, and Q.-X. Han, “Copper(II) and cadmium(II) complexes derived from Strandberg-type polyoxometalate clusters: synthesis, crystal structures, spectroscopy and biological activities,” Inorganic Chemistry Communications, vol. 86, pp. 22–25, 2017.

M. Jiang, Y.-T. Li, Z.-Y. Wu, Z.-Q. Liu, and C.-W. Yan, “Synthesis, crystal structure, cytotoxic activities and DNA-binding properties of new binuclear copper(II) complexes bridged by N,N′-bis(N-hydroxyethylaminoethyl)oxamide,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 833–844, 2009.

Y. Huang, E. Kong, J. Zhan et al., “Synthesis and cytotoxic evaluation of steroidal copper (Cu(II)) complexes,” Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications, vol. 2017, Article ID 4276919, 6 pages, 2017.

J. D. C. Almeida, D. A. Paixão, I. M. Marzano et al., “Copper(II) complexes with β-diketones and N-donor heterocyclic ligands: crystal structure, spectral properties, and cytotoxic activity,” Polyhedron, vol. 89, pp. 1–8, 2015.

M. Nasrollahzadeh, A. Zahraei, A. Ehsani, and M. Khalajc, “Synthesis, characterization, antibacterial and catalytic activity of a nanopolymer supported copper(II) complex as a highly active and recyclable catalyst for the formamidation of arylboronic acids under aerobic conditions,” RSC Advances, vol. 4, no. 39, pp. 20351–20357, 2014.

A. D. Naik, P. A. N. Reddy, M. Nethaji, and A. R. Chakravarty, “Ternary copper(II) complexes of thiosemicarbazones and heterocyclic bases showing N₃OS coordination as models for the type-2 centers of copper monooxygenases,” Inorganica Chimica Acta, vol. 349, no. 3, pp. 149–158, 2003.

K. Ghosh, P. Kumar, N. Tyagi et al., “DNA interaction, superoxide scavenging and cytotoxicity studies on new copper(II) complexes derived from a tridentate ligand,” Polyhedron, vol. 30, no. 16, pp. 2667–2677, 2011.

Z. Chen, J. Zhang, P. Zeng, S. Zhang, and C. Jin, “Evaluation of DNA binding, protein interaction, and cytotoxic activity of a mononuclear copper(II) complex,” Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie, vol. 640, no. 7, pp. 1506–1513, 2014.

D. Dey, A. De, S. Pal et al., “Synthesis, crystal structure, catecholase activity, DNA cleavage and anticancer activity of a dinuclear manganese(III)-bipyridine complex,” Indian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 54A, no. 2, pp. 170–178, 2015.

T. S. Lobana, S. Indoria, A. K. Jassal, H. Kaur, D. S. Arora, and J. P. Jasinski, “Synthesis, structures, spectroscopy and antimicrobial properties of complexes of copper(II) with salicylaldehyde N-substituted thiosemicarbazones and 2,2′-bipyridine or 1,10-phenanthroline,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 76, pp. 145–154, 2014.

Y.-Q. Zheng and J.-L. Lin, “Crystal structures of [Cu₂(bpy)₂(H₂O)(OH)₂(SO₄)]·4H₂O and [Cu(bpy)(H₂O)₂]SO₄ with bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine,” Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie, vol. 629, no. 9, pp. 1622–1626, 2003.

S. Sanotra, R. Gupta, H. N. Sheikh, B. L. Kalsotra, V. K. Gupta, and Rajnikant, “Hydrothermal synthesis and crystal structure of a supramolecular dinuclear cobalt(II) complex containing the dianion of pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid,” Monatshefte fur Chemie, vol. 144, no. 12, pp. 1807–1813, 2013.

Y. V. Kolen’ko, V. D. Maximov, A. V. Garshev, P. E. Meskin, N. N. Oleynikov, and B. R. Churagulov, “Hydrothermal synthesis of nanocrystalline and mesoporous titania from aqueous complex titanyl oxalate acid solutions,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 388, no. 4–6, pp. 411–415, 2004.

M.-S. Chen, Y.-F. Deng, X. Nie, and C.-H. Zhang, “Hydrothermal synthesis, crystal structure, and luminescence property of an Mn-Tb complex based on 5-(isonicotinamido)-isophthalate,” Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic, and Nano-Metal Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 868–872, 2014.

Y.-F. Wang, Z. Li, Y.-C. Sun, and J.-S. Zhao, “Hydrothermal synthesis, crystal structures, and characterization of two copper complexes with 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole,” Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic, and Nano-Metal Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 277–281, 2014.

P. Zhao, W. Jing, L. Jing, F. Jian, and Y. Li, “Hydrothermal synthesis, crystal structures and properties of zinc(II) di-nuclear complex and copper(I) coordination polymer based on building block 2-phenyl-4,6-di(pyridine-2-yl)pyrimidine,” Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 3743–3748, 2013.

H. A. J. L. Mourão, O. F. Lopes, A. R. Malagutti, E. C. Paris, and C. Ribeiro, “Hydrothermal synthesis and photocatalytic properties of anatase TiO₂ nanocrystals obtained from peroxytitanium complex precursor,” Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, vol. 25, pp. 320–329, 2014.

Y.-H. Wen, J.-K. Cheng, Y.-L. Feng, J. Zhang, Z.-J. Li, and Y.-G. Yao, “Hydrothermal syntheses, crystal structures and characterizations of three new copper coordination polymers,” Inorganica Chimica Acta, vol. 358, no. 12, pp. 3347–3354, 2005.

X. Li, C.-F. Bi, Y.-H. Fan, X. Zhang, N. Zhang, and X.-C. Yan, “Synthesis, crystal structure and DNA interaction of a novel three-nuclear cobalt(II) complex with Schiff base derived from 4-chloroanthranilic acid and 2,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde,” Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 582–590, 2014.

M. Hazra, T. Dolai, A. Pandey, S. K. Dey, and A. Patra, “Synthesis and characterisation of copper(II) complexes with tridentate NNO functionalized ligand: density function theory study, DNA binding mechanism, optical properties, and biological application,” Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications, vol. 2014, Article ID 104046, 13 pages, 2014.

P. Haribabu, R. K. Hussain, Y. P. Patil, and M. Nethaji, “Synthesis, crystal structure, DNA binding and cleavage activities of oximato bridged cationic dinuclear copper(II) complex having labile ligands,” Indian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 52A, no. 3, pp. 327–333, 2013.

M. Pragathi and K. H. Reddy, “Synthesis, spectral characterization and DNA interactions of copper(II) and nickel(II) complexes with unsymmetrical Schiff base ligands,” Indian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 52A, no. 7, pp. 845–853, 2013.

X.-G. Shu, C.-L. Wu, C.-J. Li, M. Zhang, K. Wan, and X. Wu, “Synthesis, crystal structure, spectroscopic properties, and interaction with Ct-DNA of Zn(II) with 2-aminoethanethiol hydrochloride ligand,” Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications, vol. 2016, Article ID 2691253, 7 pages, 2016.

Z.-Q. Liu, Y.-T. Li, Z.-Y. Wu, and S.-F. Zhang, “[Cu₄(H₂O)₄(dmapox)₂(btc)]n·10nH₂O: the first two-dimensional polymeric copper(II) complex with bridging μ-trans-oxamidate and μ₄-1,2,4,5-benzentetracarboxylato ligands: synthesis, crystal structure and DNA binding studies,” Inorganica Chimica Acta, vol. 362, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2009.

R. S. Kumar and S. Arunachalam, “DNA binding and antimicrobial studies of polymer–copper(II) complexes containing 1,10-phenanthroline and l-phenylalanine ligands,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1878–1883, 2009.

J. Long, X.-M. Wang, D.-L. Xu, and L.-S. Ding, “Spectroscopic studies on the interaction mechanisms of safranin T with herring sperm DNA using acridine orange as a fluorescence probe,” Journal of Molecular Recognition, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 131–137, 2014.

G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXS-97, Program for the Solution of Crystal Structure, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 1997.

G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-97, Program for the Refinement of Crystal Structure, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 1997.

Q. Zang, G.-Q. Zhong, and M.-L. Wang, “A copper(II) complex with pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid: synthesis, characterization, thermal decomposition, bioactivity and interactions with herring sperm DNA,” Polyhedron, vol. 100, pp. 223–230, 2015.

W. Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, vol. 9, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1998.

D. Li and G.-Q. Zhong, “Synthesis and crystal structure of the bioinorganic complex [Sb(Hedta)]·2H₂O,” Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications, vol. 2014, Article ID 461605, 7 pages, 2014.

E. H. Lizarazo-Jaimes, P. G. Reis, F. M. Bezerra et al., “Complexes of different nitrogen donor heterocyclic ligands with SbCl₃ and PhSbCl₂ as potential antileishmanial agents against SbIII-sensitive and -resistant parasites,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 132, pp. 30–36, 2014.

K. Nakamoto, Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NY, USA, 6th edition, 2009.

J. J. Murcia, M. C. Hidalgo, J. A. Navío, J. Araña, and J. M. Doña-Rodríguez, “In situ FT–IR study of the adsorption and photocatalytic oxidation of ethanol over sulfated and metallized TiO₂,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 142-143, pp. 205–213, 2014.

G.-Q. Zhong and Q. Zhong, “Solid–solid synthesis, characterization, thermal decomposition and antibacterial activities of zinc(II) and nickel(II) complexes of glycine–vanillin Schiff base ligand,” Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 236–242, 2014.

I. Das, S. A. Ansari, and N. R. Agrawal, “Growth of nanosized cupric sulphate–urea complex in aqueous medium and its characterization,” Indian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 50A, no. 6, pp. 798–801, 2011.

W. Zhong, G.-Q. Zhong, and J.-H. He, “Preparation of tribasic copper chloride nanopowders by solid state reaction at room temperature,” Journal of Synthetic Crystals, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1581–1585, 2010.

A. Rescifina, M. G. Varrica, C. Carnovale, G. Romeo, and U. Chiacchio, “Novel isoxazole polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as DNA-intercalating agents,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 51, pp. 163–173, 2012.

P. D. Ross and S. Subramanian, “Thermodynamics of protein association reactions: forces contributing to stability,” Biochemistry, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 3096–3102, 1981.

S. J. Kharat and P. S. Nikam, “Density and viscosity studies of binary mixtures of aniline + benzene and ternary mixtures of (aniline + benzene + N,N-dimethylformamide) at 298.15, 303.15, 308.15, and 313.15 K,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, vol. 131-132, pp. 81–86, 2007.

S. Satyanarayana, J. C. Dabrowiak, and J. B. Chaires, “Neither Δ- nor Λ-tris(phenanthroline)ruthenium(II) binds to DNA by classical intercalation,” Biochemistry, vol. 31, no. 39, pp. 9319–9324, 1992.

Z.-G. Zhang and X.-D. Dong, “Interaction of DNA with a novel photoactive platinum diimine complex,” BioMetals, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 283–288, 2009.