BioMed Research International

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 741403, 11 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/741403

Research Article

Moving toward Personalized Medicine in the Methadone Maintenance Treatment Program: A Pilot Study on the Evaluation of Treatment Responses in Taiwan

Hsin-Ya Lee,¹ Jih-Heng Li,1,2 Yuh-Ling Sheu,¹ Hsin-Pei Tang,³ Wei-Chiao Chang,⁴ Tze-Chun Tang,⁵ Yi-Chun Yeh,5,6 Shing-Yaw Wang,⁵ and Ray-H. Liu⁷

¹School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100 Shih-Chuan 1st Road, Kaohsiung City 807, Taiwan

²Program in Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100 Shih-Chuan 1st Road, Kaohsiung City 807, Taiwan

³Department of Addiction and Forensic Psychiatry, Jianan Mental Hospital, No. 80, Lane 870, Jhong-Shan Road, Rende District, Tainan City 71742, Taiwan

⁴School of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, No. 250 Wu-Shin Street, Taipei 110, Taiwan

⁵Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No. 100 Shih-Chuan 1st Road, Kaohsiung City 807, Taiwan

⁶Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100 Shih-Chuan 1st Road, Kaohsiung City 807, Taiwan

⁷Department of Medical Technology, Fooyin University, No. 151 Ching-Hsueh Road, Kaohsiung City 831, Taiwan

Received 18 October 2013; Accepted 25 November 2013

Academic Editor: Dongquan Shi

Copyright © 2013 Hsin-Ya Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

This pilot study simultaneously evaluated the effects of various factors, including genetic variations of CYP2B6, CYP2C19, and ABCB1, demographic characteristics, disease states, methadone-drug interactions (MDIs), and poly-substance use, on the treatment responses among non-HIV patients in the methadone maintenance treatment program (MMTP) in Taiwan. A total of 178 patients were recruited from two major hospitals that provided MMTP services in southern Taiwan, and information regarding concomitant medications and diseases was acquired from the National Health Insurance (NHI) program. The results demonstrated that the methadone maintenance dose, CYP2B6 785G allele, and ABCB1 2677T allele have positive effects on the methadone plasma concentration. In contrast, patients with HCV coinfection, alcohol problems, and psychiatric diseases may have a negative response to treatment. Thus, a comprehensive evaluation of treatment responses in the MMTP should include not only genetic polymorphisms in methadone metabolism and transporter proteins, but also concomitant diseases, MDIs, and poly-substance use. The results also suggest that personalized medicine may be indispensable for a better outcome of the MMTP.

1. Introduction

Methadone maintenance treatment programs (MMTPs) have been shown to be effective in reducing illicit drug use and risks of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C (HCV) infection [1–3]. Achievement of an optimal methadone plasma concentration is crucial for a successful MMTP [4]. However, due to wide interindividual variations in methadone pharmacokinetics [5–7], some patients’ methadone plasma concentrations may be too difficult to reach within a therapeutic range even though they receive higher dosages. Between 30% and 80% of patients are considered poor responders to MMTPs [8], and 98.6% of injecting drug users (IDUs) on a MMTP still continue to inject drugs [9].

Some factors are thought to influence the methadone plasma concentration and treatment responses. IDUs may have severe medical complications of substance use disorders, including psychiatric disease (e.g., depression, anxiety) [10–12], infectious diseases (HIV, HCV) [13], and pain disorders [14].

In addition, many treatment conditions can result in complications. For example, methadone-drug interactions (MDIs) could occur because MMTP clients have a high tendency towards taking concomitant medications (72%) [15]. Approximately 48% of patients have at least one MDI, and the most common MDI is benzodiazepines (38.1%), such as alprazolam and estazolam. Moreover, methadone interactions with some antiretroviral agents are also ubiquitous in HIV-MMTP clients [16, 17]. Some antiretroviral agents are well-documented as cytochrome P450 (CYP450) 3A4, 2B6, or 2D6 strong inducers (e.g., efavirenz) [18] or inhibitors. In a case report [19], interruption in the use of lopinavir-ritonavir triggered Torsade de Pointes (TdP) by increasing the methadone plasma concentration, because lopinavir-ritonavir may induce metabolic clearance of methadone involving CYP3A4, 2B6, and 2D6 enzymes.

Observational and in vitro studies have suggested that CYP2B6 [20–23], 2C19 [21, 22], and ABCB1 [22, 24] genetic polymorphisms have important roles in gene codes for methadone-metabolizing enzymes and transporter proteins (p-glycoprotein, P-gp). CYP2B6 has been demonstrated to be an important contributor to S-methadone metabolism, and CYP2C19 preferentially metabolizes R-methadone [21, 25]. S-methadone has been found to contribute to higher levels of dissatisfaction and the risk of QT interval prolongation [26, 27]. R-methadone has been reported to be associated with clinical effects as a result of its stronger activation of μ-opioid receptors [28]. Methadone is a substrate of P-gp, encoded by the multidrug resistance1 (ABCB1) gene, which has the ability to influence the bioavailability of orally administered methadone in the gastrointestinal tract and hepatocytes and has an effect on mediating methadone transport through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) [29, 30].

Even though joint genetic effects of CYP and P-gp on a MMTP have been demonstrated in some pharmacogenetic studies [20, 31–34], few studies have simultaneously considered other important factors, such as disease states, MDIs, and poly-substance use, in assessing the methadone treatment responses, particularly in the ethnic Chinese populations. It is especially important that medical professionals understand the efficacy of and crucial factors related to MMTPs.

In Taiwan, to encounter the escalating IDUs and HIV infections through needle sharing, the first MMTPs were implemented in July 2006 [35, 36]. However, a thorough evaluation on the treatment responses of a MMTP has not yet been conducted. Therefore, the main purpose of this pilot study was to simultaneously evaluate the influence of genetic variations of CYP2B6, CYP2C19, and ABCB1, disease states, MDIs, and poly-substance use on the methadone steady-state trough plasma level and treatment responses in MMTP patients. In addition, as the methadone plasma dose and plasma concentration may be severely interfered by antiretroviral drugs, we recruited non-HIV patients to avoid the impact of antiretroviral agents on the MMTP and to evaluate the potential factors related to the methadone plasma concentration and treatment responses more precisely.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Patients

This study was conducted from February 2010 to December 2011 at Jianan Mental Hospital of the Department of Health, the first mental hospital to implement a MMTP, and Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital of Kaohsiung Medical University, a major medical center in southern Taiwan. One hundred and seventy-eight patients with no HIV infection (confirmed by medical records) aged ≥20 years and who were not pregnant were recruited. To ensure that patients’ methadone plasma concentrations were at the steady-state condition and have stable methadone doses, patients who had participated in the MMTP ≥  1 month were recruited.

2.2. Ethics Statement

All information was kept strictly confidential and used for research proposes only. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Jianan Mental Hospital (Approval number 10-002) and Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital (Approval number KMUH-IRB-980429). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants who were given a detailed description of the study and had the chance to clarify any questions. Before agreeing to join the study, all participants were informed of the purpose of the study and the role and functions of their participation. Participants had the right to decline to take part in this research. They could also stop participating in the research at any time. Treatments of participants and nonparticipants at the hospital were not discriminated in any way.

2.3. Clinical Assessments

The participants were interviewed by a trained research staff to collect information on their sociodemographic characteristics, histories of substance use, and adverse drug reactions. Sociodemographic characteristics included age, sex, weight, educational level (years of education completed), and current marital status. Substance use referred to the use of cigarettes, alcohol, or betel quid, while drug use included illicit use of heroin and amphetamines.

Data on the methadone maintenance dose, admission date to the MMTP, and data regarding hepatitis, including hepatitis B (HBV) or HCV, as defined by a serological blood test with the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or detected antibodies to HCV, respectively, were obtained from medical records.

Information regarding concomitant medications and diseases during the period of the MMTP was acquired from the National Health Insurance (NHI) program, a national universal health insurance program with a coverage rate of over 99% for all citizens in Taiwan. General medical and pharmacy records were obtained for all patients. MDIs in the Taiwan MMTP [15] were categorized as follows:

(1)decreased methadone metabolism: by agents that could inhibit CYP3A4, 2B6, and 2D6 enzymes, such as cimetidine, ketoconazole, erythromycin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole;(2)increased methadone metabolism: by agents that could induce CYP3A4, 2B6, and 2D6 enzymes, such as dexamethasone, carbamazepine, spironolactone, and rifampine;(3)antianxiety drugs: benzodiazepines (BZDs) and non-BZDs, such as zolpidem and zopiclone;(4)antipsychotic drugs: chlorpromazine, prochlorperazine, thioridazine, and haloperidol;(5)opioid-related drugs: morphine, tramadol, nalbuphine, propoxyphene, and bupernorphine;(6)antidepressive drugs: imipramine, fluoxetine, sertraline, amitriptyline, paroxetine, fluroxamine, and risperidone;(7)QT prolongation drugs: droperidol, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and ciprofloxacin.

2.4. Treatment Responses

Response to treatment is defined by nonconsumption of heroin. Determination of nonconsumption of heroin (responders) was first identified by the patients’ self-reporting, followed by confirmation of the negative urine results for illicit opiates use, whereas consumption of drugs (nonresponders) was based on the self-reporting of patients and confirmed by the positive urine results for opiates. Urinalysis results were retrieved from medical records. In Taiwan, poppy seeds are not a traditional food and possession or consumption of poppy seeds is an illegal act. Therefore, false positive results for morphine due to consumption of poppy seeds can be excluded. The urine was thus defined as positive for illicit opiates use when the amount of morphine in the urine sample was equal to or greater than 300 ng/mL, as determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

2.5. Plasma Sample Analysis

Blood samples were withdrawn prior to next methadone administration (trough methadone plasma concentration). After blood samples (5 mL) were drawn, they were centrifuged and the plasma was stored at −70°C until quantification of the enantiomers of methadone (R-methadone and S-methadone). The concentrations of enantiomers of methadone in the plasma were determined by capillary electrophoresis (CE-UV) [37] after liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) of samples with ethyl acetate/heptane (4 : 1, v/v). A Beckman P/ACE MDQ system with a UV detector (214 nm) was used for the enantioselective determination of methadone and atenolol as an internal standard (I.S.). After LLE, CE was performed in an uncoated fused-silica capillary of 31.2 cm (effective length 20 cm) with a 50-μm internal diameter. A constant voltage of 20 kV was applied and the cartridge temperature was maintained at 25°C. The running buffer was 80 mM phosphate buffer and 3.3 mM carboxymethyl-β-cyclodextrin (CM-β-CD) (pH 3). The relative standard deviation (RSD) and relative error (RE) were less than 5.3% and 7.7%, respectively, and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was found to be 10 ng/mL.

2.6. Genetic Polymorphism Analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from venous blood samples using a FlexiGene DNA kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For detection of CYP2B6 A785G, G516T, and C1459T, CYP2C19 G681A, G636A, and C3402T, and ABCB1 C1236T, G2677A, and C3435T single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay was used.

PCR reactions were performed in a reaction volume of 50  with 100 ng genomic DNA, SapphireAmp Fast PCR Master Mix (Takara, Otsu, Shiga, Japan), and 25 pmole of each primer. The protocol was as follows: 35 cycles, with an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 10 seconds, followed by annealing at primer-specific temperatures (56.4°C−62.4°C) for 10 seconds, 20 seconds of extension at 72°C, and cooling to 4°C for 5 minutes. PCR fragments were amplified using a PCR Thermal Cycler Dice TP600 (Takara, Otsu, Shiga, Japan). For the CYP2B6 A785G, G516T, and C1459T, CYP2C19 G681A, G636A and C3402T, and ABCB1 C1236T, G2677A, and C3435T SNPs, the restriction enzymes, Bsr I, Sty I, Bgl II, Msp I, BamH I, MnI I, Hae III, BseY I, and Mbo I, were applied, respectively. DNA fragments were separated by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel.

The SNPs were also confirmed using direct sequencing. Amplicons were purified using PCR Clean Up-M (Viogene, Taiwan). The PCR products were then directly sequenced using a BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit and analyzed on an ABI 3730 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was tested for each SNP. R,S-methadone, R-methadone, and S-methadone plasma concentrations were divided by the methadone dose (in milligrams per day) and by the patient weight (in kilograms). Then, the values were natural-log transformed before analysis. The Levene test was applied to verify homogeneity of variance.

For the purpose of assessing the statistical differences between responders and nonresponders and between CYP2B6, CYP2C19, and ABCB1 genotypes, analysis of variance (ANOVA), or the -test was used for data presenting a homogenous distribution, or the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test or the Mann-Whitney test was used for those that did not attain the estimated homogeneity and normality for continuous variables. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical variables to account for the small sample size.

Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed in order to explore the variables independently related to methadone plasma concentrations. However, because methadone plasma concentrations were skewed positively, the methadone plasma concentrations were natural-logarithmically transformed to achieve a normal distribution. The variables included were age, weight, sex, sociodemographics, methadone dose, current amphetamine use, methadone treatment duration, drugs related to methadone-drug interactions, and CYP2B6, CYP2C19, and ABCB1 genetic variability.

Moreover, stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify associations between potentially predictive variables (sociodemographics, tobacco use, betel nut use, alcohol use, current amphetamines use, methadone treatment duration, HBV, HCV, pain disorders, depression, anxiety, psychiatric disorders, methadone maintenance dose, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, and ABCB1 genetic variability) and treatment responses. A variable was selected using mixed stepwise regression and included if its value was ≤0.05 and excluded if its -value was ≥0.05.

All analyses were completed using JMP (version 9.0, SAS Institute, Cary, USA). The statistical tests performed were two-tailed and a value <0.05 denoted a statistically significant difference.

3. Results

The results were based on the data of 178 patients, including 156 males and 22 females. The mean age (±SD) of the patients was 39.5 ± 7.1 years (range, 25–59 years), and the mean weight was 68.8 ± 12.8 kg (range, 40–118 kg). Of the patients, 160 (89.9%) and 33 (18.5%) had HCV and HBV coinfection, respectively, and 128 (72.7%) patients had coadministration of other medications with methadone. The mean methadone daily maintenance dose was 50.8 ± 30.5 mg (range 5–250 mg/d).

A lack of available genotype data in two male subjects resulted from methodological problems. The mean R,S-methadone, R-methadone, and S-methadone trough levels were 172.9 ± 150.6 ng/mL (range 6.9–1368.0 ng/mL), 92.9 ± 79.8 ng/mL (range 6.9–800.7 ng/mL), and 81.9 ± 73.2 ng/mL (range 7.3–567.3 ng/mL), respectively.

3.1. Demographic Characteristics, Disease State, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, and ABCB1 Genotypes

The demographic characteristics, concomitant diseases, substance use history, and MDIs of patients (split into responders and nonresponders) are shown in Table 1. Responders and nonresponders differed significantly with respect to gender, alcohol use, HCV coinfection, psychiatric disorders, and benzodiazepine use. Although the responders and nonresponders had similar methadone doses, R,S-methadone, R-methadone, and S-methadone concentrations (Table 1), there were statistically significant differences in the distributions of ABCB1 G2677T and C3435T between the responders and nonresponders (Table 2). No differences were found in the distribution of CYP2B6 and CYP2C19 genotypes between responders and nonresponders. CYP2B6, CYP2C19, and ABCB1 allele frequencies observed in MMTP Taiwanese were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ( > 0.05).

Table 1: Patient characteristics of responders and nonresponders to the Taiwan methadone maintenance treatment program (MMTP) based on urine morphine screen tests ().

Variables
Responders

()
Nonresponders

()
value

Age, yr (SD)
39.1 (7.3)
39.6 (7.0)
0.67

Weight, kg (SD)
71.0 (14.5)
68.0 (12.1)
0.14

Gender, (%)

    Male
50 (32.1)
106 (67.9)
0.03*

Education, (%)

    Below high school
39 (36.4)
68 (63.6)
0.57

    High school or above
23 (32.4)
48 (67.6)

Marital status, (%)

    Married or living with partner
14 (31.1)
31 (68.9)
0.65

    Never married
36 (37.5)
60 (62.5)

    Divorced/widowed
11 (30.6)
25 (69.4)

Dose, mg (SD)
51.6 (30.8)
50.4 (30.5)
0.78

R,S-Methadone, ng/mL (SD)
172.9 (134.9)
172.9 (158.8)
0.99

R-Methadone, ng/mL (SD)
92.9 (66.5)
92.9 (86.3)
0.99

S-Methadone, ng/mL (SD)
81.2 (70.6)
82.3 (74.8)
0.92

Substance use history, (%)

    Tobacco
55 (36.7)
95 (63.3)
0.23

    Alcohol
26 (44.8)
32 (55.2)
0.03*

    Betel nut
21 (43.8)
27 (56.3)
0.15

Current amphetamine use, (%)
10 (27.1)
27 (72.9)
0.52

Treatment duration, mo (SD)
19.4 (13.9)
17.4 (13.9)
0.37

Heroin use history, yr (SD)
7.8 (5.7)
8.5 (5.6)
0.48

HBV, (%)
13 (39.4)
20 (60.6)
0.55

HCV, (%)
60 (37.5)
100 (62.5)
0.03*

Pain disorders, (%)
25 (39.1)
39 (60.9)
0.37

Depression, (%)
11 (44.0)
14 (56.0)
0.29

Anxiety, (%)
15 (46.9)
17 (53.1)
0.11

Psychiatric disordersa, (%)
15 (57.6)
11 (42.3)
0.01*

Methadone-drug interaction

(1) Increase methadone metabolism, (%)
17 (46.0)
20 (54.0)
0.11

(2) Decrease methadone metabolism, (%)
9 (36.0)
16 (64.0)
0.89

(3) Benzodiazepines (BZD) or non-BZD, (%)
18 (56.2)
14 (43.8)
0.007*

(4) Antipsychotic drugs, (%)
2 (28.6)
5 (71.4)
0.72

(5) Opioid-related drugs, (%)
12 (40.0)
18 (60.0)
0.53

(6) Antidepressive drugs, (%)
5 (50.0)
5 (50.0)
0.32

(7) QT prolongation, (%)
7 (35.0)
13 (65.0)
0.98

Psychiatric disorders included schizophrenic disorders, hallucinosis, paranoia, panic disorders, and neurotic disorders.

*Statistical significance set at ; comparisons were performed by the Mann-Whitney U test, t-test, Chi-square test, or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate.

Table 2: Frequencies of CYP2B6, CYP2C19, and ABCB1 polymorphisms in responders and nonresponders to treatment ()a.

Genotype
Responders

()
Nonresponders

()
value

CYP2B6

    A785G (*4)

        A/A
29 (47.5)
72 (62.6)
0.15

        A/G
26 (42.6)
35 (30.4)

        G/G
6 (9.9)
8 (7.0)

    G516T (*9)

        G/G
38 (62.3)
86 (74.8)
0.10

        G/T
19 (31.1)
27 (23.5)

        T/T
4 (6.6)
2 (1.7)

CYP2C19

    G651A (*2)

        G/G
27 (44.3)
63 (54.8)
0.21

        G/A
32 (52.5)
45 (39.1)

        A/A
2 (3.2)
7 (6.1)

    G636A (*3)

        G/G
53 (86.9)
105 (91.3)
0.14

        G/A
6 (9.8)
10 (8.7)

        A/A
2 (3.3)
0 (0)

    C3402T (*17)

        C/C
60 (98.4)
114 (99.1)
0.64

        C/T
1 (1.6)
1 (0.9)

        T/T
0 (0)
0 (0)

ABCB1 Genotype

    C1236T

        C/C
5 (8.2)
15 (13.0)
0.53

        C/T
30 (49.2)
49 (42.6)

        T/T
26 (42.6)
51 (44.4)

    G2677T

        G/G
22 (36.1)
26 (22.6)
0.03*

        G/T
21 (34.4)
63 (54.8)

        T/T
18 (29.5)
26 (22.6)

    C3435T

        C/C
30 (49.2)
39 (33.9)
0.02*

        C/T
20 (32.8)
63 (54.8)

        T/T
11 (18.0)
13 (11.3)

aNo available data on genotype for two subjects (1 responder and 1 nonresponder) due to methodological problems.

*Statistical significance set at ; comparisons were performed by the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate.

3.2. Methadone Maintenance Dose, Plasma Concentrations, and CYP2B6, CYP2C19, and ABCB1 Genotypes

We investigated the trough R,S-methadone, R-methadone, S-methadone concentrations and methadone dose by the genotypes of the CYP2B6, CYP2C19, and ABCB1 genes (Table 3). For CYP2B6 A785G, though the methadone dose did not differ significantly (), the R,S-methadone plasma concentration was significantly different among the allele groups (); in particular, that of G/G carriers (5.84 ± 0.77 ngkg/mLmg) was higher than that of A/A carriers (5.35 ± 0.81 ngkg/mLmg).

Table 3: Influence of CYP2B6, CYP2C19, and ABCB1 polymorphism on methadone plasma concentrations ()a.

Gene
(%)
Dose (SD)
R,S-Methadoneb (SD)
R-Methadoneb (SD)
S-Methadoneb (SD)

CYP2B6 genotype

    A785G (*4)

        A/A
101 (57.4)
51.4 (26.5)
5.35 (0.81)
4.32 (0.69)
4.15 (0.67)

        A/G
61 (34.6)
52.6 (38.2)
5.22 (0.81)
4.21 (0.66)
4.05 (0.72)

        G/G
14 ( 8.0)
40.9 (18.4)
5.84 (0.77)
4.60 (0.79)
4.52 (0.89)

         value
—
0.42
0.03*
0.15
0.08

    G516T (*9)

        G/G
124 (70.5)
50.4 (24.9)
5.28 (0.82)
4.29 (0.67)
4.10 (0.67)

        G/T
46 (26.1)
54.4 (43.1)
5.42 (0.76)
4.29 (0.70)
4.21 (0.78)

        T/T
6 (3.4)
36.7 (19.7)
5.99 (0.99)
4.57 (0.99)
4.57 (1.02)

         value
—
0.38
0.09
0.63
0.22

CYP2C19 genotype

    G651A (*2)

        G/G
90 (51.1)
52.6 (35.2)
5.40 (0.79)
4.33 (0.74)
4.18 (0.78)

        G/A
77 (43.8)
49.8 (24.9)
5.28 (0.86)
4.29 (0.62)
4.12 (0.64)

        A/A
9 (5.1)
45.2 (26.8)
5.38 (0.68)
4.24 (0.72)
3.95 (0.62)

        P value
—
0.71
0.66
0.90
0.60

    G636A (*3)

        G/G
158 (89.8)
52.1 (31.3)
5.33 (0.83)
4.30 (0.69)
4.15 (0.70)

        G/A
16 (9.1)
39.1 (20.9)
5.48 (0.70)
4.28 (0.64)
4.08 (0.87)

        A/A
2 (1.1)
62.5 (31.8)
5.81 (0.13)
4.85 (0.16)
4.40 (0.66)

         value
—
0.24
0.55
0.52
0.81

    C3402T (*17)

        C/C
174 (98.9)
49.9 (26.7)
5.35 (0.82)
4.30 (0.69)
4.15 (0.72)

        C/T
2 (1.1)
140 (155.6)
4.55 (0.32)
4.18 (0.53)
3.79 (0.91)

        T/T
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)

         value
—
<0.0001*
0.08
0.81
0.47

ABCB1 genotype

    C1236T

        C/C
19 (10.8)
67.9 (50.4)
5.23 (0.66)
4.36 (0.52)
4.21 (0.48)

        C/T
80 (45.5)
50.4 (28.3)
5.38 (0.82)
4.29 (0.73)
4.17 (0.72)

        T/T
77 (43.7)
47.2 (24.7)
5.37 (0.85)
4.29 (0.68)
4.10 (0.76)

         value
—
0.02*
0.75
0.91
0.79

    G2677T

        G/G
48 (27.3)
49.6 (39.4)
5.23 (0.86)
4.12 (0.76)
4.00 (0.68)

        G/T
84 (47.7)
53.1 (27.3)
5.24 (0.73)
4.26 (0.62)
4.08 (0.67)

        T/T
44 (25.0)
48.5 (25.5)
5.67 (0.86)
4.58 (0.65)
4.41 (0.77)

         value
—
0.68
0.008*
0.004*
0.01*

    C3435T

        C/C
69 (39.2)
56.8 (39.3)
5.26 (0.87)
4.31 (0.69)
4.13 (0.63)

        C/T
83 (47.2)
47.1 (21.6)
5.36 (0.74)
4.26 (0.71)
4.12 (0.76)

        T/T
24 (13.6)
47.7 (26.9)
5.52 (0.91)
4.49 (0.58)
4.27 (0.78)

         value
—
0.13
0.41
0.36
0.63

No available data on genotype for two subjects due to methodological problems.

bR,S-Methadone, R-methadone, and S-methadone plasma concentrations were divided by the methadone dose (in milligrams per day) and by the patient weight (in kilograms). The unit of concentration is ng·kg/mL·mg. Then, the values were natural log transformed before analysis. All values are expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD).

*Statistical significance set at ; comparisons were performed by the t-test, ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U test, or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate.

For ABCB1 C1236T, the T homozygous carriers ( mg) showed a trend towards a lower maintenance methadone dose than the T heterozygous carriers (50.4 ± 28.3 mg) and noncarriers (67.9 ± 50.4 mg) (). For ABCB1 G2677T, the R,S-methadone (G/G group 5.23 ± 0.86 ngkg/mLmg versus G/T group 5.24 ± 0.73 ngkg/mLmg versus T/T group 5.67 ± 0.86 ngkg/mLmg, P = 0.008), R-methadone (G/G group 4.12 ± 0.76 ngkg/mLmg versus G/T group 4.26 ± 0.62 ngkg/mLmg versus T/T group 4.58 ± 0.65 ngkg/mLmg, ), and S-methadone (G/G group 4.00 ± 0.68 ngkg/mLmg versus G/T group 4.08 ± 0.67 ngkg/mLmg versus T/T group 4.41 ± 0.77 ngkg/mLmg, ) plasma concentrations differed significantly between the different genotypes.

Moreover, we studied the association between the methadone dose and the methadone plasma levels with different genotypes in the responders and nonresponders. The results did not differ significantly in terms of CYP2B6 and CYP2C19 genetic variability, with the exception of the ABCB1 G2677T genotype (Table 4). In the responders, the R,S-methadone (G/G group 5.20 ± 0.98 ngkg/mLmg versus G/T group 5.00 ± 0.72 ngkg/mLmg versus T/T group 5.97 ± 0.71 ngkg/mLmg, ), R-methadone (G/G group 4.09 ± 0.83 ngkg/mLmg versus G/T group 4.15 ± 0.51 ngkg/mLmg versus T/T group 4.72 ± 0.72 ngkg/mLmg, ), and S-methadone (G/G group 3.95 ± 0.76 ngkg/mLmg versus G/T group 3.93 ± 0.61 ngkg/mLmg versus T/T group 4.55 ± 0.75 ngkg/mLmg, ) plasma concentrations were significantly different among the different genotypes, although the methadone dose did not differ significantly among the allele groups. This result suggested that ABCB1 gene polymorphism may play an important role in the methadone plasma concentrations.

Table 4: Influence of ABCB1 polymorphism on methadone plasma concentrations in responders and nonresponders ()a.

ABCB1 genotype
(%)
Dose (SD)
R,S-Methadoneb (SD)
R-Methadoneb (SD)
S-Methadoneb (SD)

Responders ()

    G2677T

        G/G
22 (36.1)
47.6 (31.4)
5.20 (0.98)
4.09 (0.83)
3.95 (0.76)

        G/T
21 (34.4)
61.3 (29.8)
5.00 (0.72)
4.15 (0.51)
3.93 (0.61)

        T/T
18 (29.5)
47.1 (30.1)
5.97 (0.71)
4.72 (0.72)
4.55 (0.75)

         value
—
0.24
0.001*
0.01*
0.01*

No available data on genotype for two subjects due to methodological problems.

bR,S-Methadone, R-methadone, and S-methadone plasma concentrations were divided by the methadone dose (in milligrams per day) and by the patient weight (in kilograms). The unit of concentration is ng·kg/mL·mg. Then, the values were natural log transformed before analysis. All values are expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD).

*Statistical significance set at ; comparisons were performed by the ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate.

3.3. Factors Associated with Methadone Plasma Concentrations and Treatment Responses

Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the methadone maintenance dose (β = 0.0006, ), CYP2B6 A785G (β = 0.44, ), and ABCB1 G2677T (β = 0.37, ) were independent predictors determining the R,S-methadone plasma concentration (Table 5). These results showed that the methadone maintenance dose, CYP2B6 A785G, and ABCB1 G2677T were positively associated with the R,S-methadone plasma concentration.

Table 5: Methadone maintenance dose and CYP2B6 and ABCB1 gene mutation relationships with R,S-methadone plasma concentrationa, b.

Variable
Regression coefficient ()
95% CI
value

Dose (mg)
0.0006
0.002–0.009
0.001*

CYP2B6 A785G

    A/G, G/G (versus A/A)
0.44
0.049–0.839
0.03*

ABCB1 G2677T

    G/T, T/T (versus G/G)
0.37
0.124–0.616
0.003*

R,S-Methadone concentration was natural-logarithmically transformed to achieve a normal distribution.

bResults are from stepwise multiple linear regression analysis. Age, marital status, weight, current amphetamine use, treatment duration, drugs related to methadone-drug interactions, CYP2B6 G516T (*9), CYP2C19 G681A/C (*2), G636A (*3), C3402T (*17), ABCB1 C1236T, and C3435T were not significantly associated. Only variables significantly contributing to the models are displayed (variables selected using mixed stepwise regression); value for model: <0.0001.

Stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to identify associations of variables with treatment responses. Adjusted analyses showed that significant correlates for nonresponders were HCV coinfection (adjusted odds ratio, AOR  =  6.42, P  =  0.03), psychiatric diseases (AOR  =  2.71, ), alcohol problems (AOR  = 2.25, ), and CYP2B6 A785G (AOR  = 1.74, ). However, ABCB1 G2677T (AOR  = 0.48, ) and the female gender (AOR = 0.44, ) were associated with a reduced odds of positive urine test with morphine (Table 6).

Table 6: Variables significantly associated with nonresponders in the Taiwan methadone maintenance treatment program (MMTP)a.

Variable
AORc
95 % CId
value

Sex

    Female (versus male)
0.44
0.86–6.24
0.09

CYP2B6 A785G (*4)

    A/G, G/G (versus A/A)
1.74
0.89–3.46
0.10

ABCB1 G2677T/A

    G/T, T/T (versus G/G)
0.48
0.23–1.01
0.05

Psychiatric disordersb
2.71
1.10–6.53
0.02*

Alcohol use history
2.25
1.12–4.59
0.02*

HCV
6.42
1.14–121.3
0.03*

Age, marital status, tobacco use, betel nut use, current amphetamine use, treatment duration, HBV, pain disorders, depression, anxiety, methadone maintenance dose, CYP2B6 G516T, CYP2C19 G681A/C, G636A, C3402T, ABCB1 C1236T, and C3435T were not significantly associated. In the multiple logistic regression model, variables were selected using mixed stepwise regression; value for model: 0.0002.

bPsychiatric disorders included schizophrenic disorders, hallucinosis, paranoia, panic disorders, and neurotic disorders.

cAOR, adjusted odds ratio.

d95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

4. Discussion

A successful methadone maintenance treatment program (MMTP) for opioid-dependent users is associated with the optimal methadone dosage and methadone plasma concentrations. A number of factors related to the optimal methadone dosage and methadone plasma concentrations, including poly-substance use, concomitant diseases, MDIs, genetic polymorphisms in metabolism enzymes, CYP2B6 and CYP2C19, and transporter proteins, ABCB1, were investigated comprehensively in our study. We observed that the methadone maintenance dose, the CYP2B6 785G allele, and the ABCB1 2677T allele have positive effects on the methadone plasma concentrations. Furthermore, a protective factor associated with treatment response was the ABCB1 2677T allele and the CYP2B6 785G allele, and the risk factors were HCV infection, alcohol problems, and diagnosis with a psychiatric disease.

Many Taiwan IDUs had an experience of sharing needles or dilution water, and the HIV prevalence among IDUs reached a peak in 2005 [35, 36]. However, many antiretroviral agents [18, 19] have been investigated as CYP3A4, 2B6, or 2D6 strong inducers or inhibitors. In order to avoid an influence of antiretroviral agents on the pharmacokinetics of methadone, we recruited non-HIV patients in this study. Therefore, the data derived from this study can provide more precise evidence in terms of predicting the methadone plasma concentrations and treatment responses.

Previous studies regarding ABCB1 pharmacogenetics indicated that individuals with the 3-locus genotype pattern TT-TT-TT (C1236T, G2677T, and C3435T) have an approximately 5-fold chance of requiring a higher methadone dose [38]. Patients with C3435T alleles were more likely to require a higher methadone dose than noncarriers [31]. However, the genetic effects of P-gp on the methadone plasma concentration and treatment responses remain unclear.

In this study, we found that the ABCB1 2677TT allele has positive effects on methadone plasma concentrations and treatment responses. Subjects with mutations in C1236T, G2677T, or C3435T may have a lower P-gp expression or function at the BBB, such that the CNS exposure to methadone is increased, and a lower dose is required to prevent overdoses [24]. It has been shown that a synonymous SNP in C1236T is linked to G2677T and C3435T SNPs [39]. Thus, we observed that the effects of ABCB1 G2677T on methadone plasma concentrations were similar to those of C1236T in this study. 1236T homozygous carriers needed lower maintenance doses (47.2 ± 24.7 mg) than heterozygous carriers (50.4 ± 28.3 mg) and noncarriers (67.9 ± 50.4 mg). The effects of ABCB1 genetic polymorphism on the methadone dose in this study were also consistent with the results of Coller et al. [24], who showed that TT-TT (G2677T, C3435T) carriers (38.0 ± 16.8 mg) required a lower methadone dose than noncarriers (61.3 ± 24.6 mg). However, conflicting studies on the effect of ABCB1 genetic variability on methadone dose and plasma concentrations have been published [20, 31]. Crettol et al. [20] showed that 2677TT carriers (2.75 ng/mLmg) had a lower R,S-methadone plasma level than 2677GT carriers (3.23 ng/mLmg) and 2677GG carriers (3.46 ng/mLmg). Their study was conducted in 5 methadone dispensing centers in Geneva, Bern, Montreux, Lausanne, and Switzerland. Hung et al. [31] revealed that 3435T carriers have 2.58-fold to require higher methadone dose than noncarriers.

The CYP2B6 785GG allele also has positive effects on methadone plasma concentrations. The effects of CYP2B6 genetic polymorphism on the methadone dose and methadone plasma concentrations in this study were consistent with the results of Levran et al. [38], who showed that Israeli Jewish subjects with 785GG (596.7 ng/mL) had a higher R,S-methadone plasma level than those with 785AA (514.9 ng/mL), while 785GG carriers (88.3 mg) had a lower methadone dose than 785AA (151.4 mg). Our study revealed that patients with 785GG (5.84 ngkg/mLmg) had a higher R,S-methadone plasma level than those with 785AA (5.35 ngkg/mLmg), while 785GG carriers (40.9 mg) had a lower methadone dose than 785AA (51.4 mg). Fonseca et al. [34] reported that the contributions to clinical treatment responses from ABCB1, CYP2B6, and CYP2D6 genetic polymorphism are marginal. Nevertheless, these controversial results may be explained by different ethnicities or characteristics of participants.

We observed that 89.9% (160/178) of the patients were infected with HCV, but only 3.4% (6/178) of the patients received HCV therapy (ribavirin plus peginterferon alpha 2A or 2B). A very low proportion of MMTP patients receive HCV treatment [40]. HCV treatment with pegylated interferon-alfa plus ribavirin is often complicated by psychiatric side effects in patients with drug addiction because depression, anxiety, fatigue, flu-like syndromes, and irritability are typical interferon-alfa-associated adverse events. Patients can have an increased risk of discontinuing HCV treatment early in the first three months when most psychiatric adverse events appear and flu-like syndromes may be misunderstood as withdrawal syndromes [41]. However, MMTP clients who do not accept HCV treatment may also have similar uncomfortable feelings, such as fatigue, nausea, loss of appetite, muscle ache, flu-like symptoms, and depression, which may be mistaken as withdrawal syndromes as well. Relapse of illicit drug abuse may then follow. Thus, patients with HCV coinfection may have an increased risk to positive urine tests for morphine.

Poly-substance use, such as consumption of amphetamines, betel nut, cigarettes, and alcohol, has been found to be common among Taiwan MMTP patients [15], especially alcohol drinking [42]. A high proportion of Taiwanese MMTP patients have alcohol problems (31.4%) [42]; this is also true in other countries (41–52%) [43]. Alcohol problems have a negative effect on illicit opioid use. Coconsumption of methadone with alcohol is not only associated with road traffic crashes [44] but also related to an increased risk of relapsing into illicit drug use and discharge from the MMTP, particularly in females [45]. Therefore, alcohol problems among MMTP patients should be monitored closely.

Psychiatric comorbidity, such as schizophrenia, low mood, anxiety, hallucinosis, and panic disorders, often coexists in MMTP patients (78%) [46, 47]. Patients with psychiatric comorbidity may require a higher maintenance dose (154 ± 84 mg) than patients (99 ± 49 mg) without psychiatric disorders [48]. About 35% of MMTP patients with concurrent psychiatric diseases were found to be regular or problem users of BZDs, and they were more likely to have opioid-positive urine screens during the MMTP [49]. In addition, concurrent psychiatric diseases may reduce quality of life in MMTP clients [47].

There was a tendency that the CYP2B6 785GG allele has negative effects on treatment responses (AOR  = 1.74, ). Previous studies [21, 32, 33] found that CYP2B6 enzyme genetic polymorphisms were related to S-methadone metabolism, which often contributed to uncomfortable feelings and dissatisfaction with the MMTP [27]. Additionally, CYP2B6 slow metabolizers exhibit a reduced ability to metabolize S-methadone and were associated with an increased risk of a prolonged QT interval (OR = 4.5) [26], which may increase the risk of cardiac arrhythmias and sudden death.

The mean methadone maintenance dose in this study was 50.8 ± 30.5 mg, and in other studies Taiwan or Chinese MMTP patients ranged from 35 mg to 54.7 mg [50, 51]. However, the mean methadone maintenance dose was found to vary from 59.2 mg to 134 mg in Caucasians [20, 24, 32, 34], which is much higher than that in ethnic Chinese. The interethnicity or interindividual differences may result from genetic polymorphisms in metabolism enzymes and transporter proteins. We also detected CYP2B6 C1459T genetic variability in our study and found that all MMTP clients were heterozygous carriers. The frequency of the CYP2B6 1459T allele in these Taiwan MMTP patients was about 50%, while it was 11.2% in Caucasians [20, 33]. This may be explained by patients with C1459T mutations having a significantly reduced CYP2B6 protein expression, which decreases the enzymatic activity [52]. Hence, patients in Taiwan MMTPs may have a lower CYP2B6 metabolism enzyme activity and consequently require a lower methadone maintenance dose than Caucasians. The relationship between CYP2B6 C1459T genetic polymorphisms and methadone maintenance dose among different ethnicities may be worthy of investigation in the future.

These results should be interpreted within the context of the following limitations. This study was conducted in southern Taiwan, and the results may not be generalized to other regions in Taiwan. In this study, we only recruited non-HIV patients, but some patients may use psychoactive drugs, which may interfere with methadone metabolic disposition. We also observed that psychoactive drugs or other drugs may not be key factors affecting on methadone plasma concentrations (Table 5). Finally, because MMTP patients may have different attitudes towards or habits related to the treatment of diseases, some may use over-the-counter (OTC) medications or Chinese herbal medicines to alleviate withdrawal symptoms. Therefore, the interactions of methadone with OTC drugs or Chinese herbal medicines may be underestimated among MMTP patients who used additional OTC medications or Chinese herbal medicines, and we did not consider these effects in assessing the methadone plasma concentrations and treatment responses.

In summary, we controlled some important factors, such as antiretroviral agents, which may affect the pharmacokinetics of methadone severely and confounded (or obscured) related variables that may have an impact on the methadone plasma concentrations and treatment responses. Therefore, the variables explored in this study can provide more precise evidence in predicting the methadone plasma concentrations and treatment responses.

The results of our study demonstrated that the methadone maintenance dose, CYP2B6 785G allele, and ABCB1 2677T allele have positive effects on the methadone plasma concentrations. Furthermore, a positive indicator of treatment responses is the ABCB1 2677T allele. In contrast, patients with HCV coinfection, alcohol problems, and psychiatric diseases may have negative treatment responses. Thus, the results suggest that a comprehensive evaluation of treatment responses in the MMTP should include not only genetic polymorphisms in methadone metabolism and transporter proteins, but also concomitant diseases, MDIs, and poly-substance use. This pilot study also provides clues that personalized medicine may play an important role in determining a better outcome of the MMTP.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jin-Song Wu and Chao-Ying Ko of the Kaoping Division, Bureau of National Health Insurance, Taiwan, for their assistance in collecting data from the NHI program. They thank Chien-Hung Liu, Hui-Liang Tsao, and Sao-Yi Hong of the Department of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital, for their valuable help with collecting self-reporting data of using drugs from patients. They would also like to thank the patients for participating in the study. The study was supported in part by Grants from Taiwan Food and Drug Administration (DOH101-FDA-61401 and DOH102-FDA-61102).

References

F. Faggiano, F. Vigna-Taglianti, E. Versino, and P. Lemma, “Methadone maintenance at different dosages for opioid dependence,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 3, Article ID CD002208, 2003.

J. Willner-Reid, K. A. Belendiuk, D. H. Epstein, J. Schmittner, and K. L. Preston, “Hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus risk behaviors in polydrug users on methadone maintenance,” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 78–86, 2008.

R. D. Burt, H. Hagan, R. S. Garfein, K. Sabin, C. Weinbaum, and H. Thiede, “Trends in hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus prevalence, risk behaviors, and preventive measures among seattle injection drug users aged 18–30 years, 1994–2004,” Journal of Urban Health, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 436–454, 2007.

M. Farré, A. Mas, M. Torrens, V. Moreno, and J. Camí, “Retention rate and illicit opioid use during methadone maintenance interventions: a meta-analysis,” Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 283–290, 2002.

D. W. Boulton, P. Arnaud, and C. L. DeVane, “Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of methadone enantiomers after a single oral dose of racemate,” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 48–57, 2001.

A. Ferrari, C. P. R. Coccia, A. Bertolini, and E. Sternieri, “Methadone—metabolism, pharmacokinetics and interactions,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 551–559, 2004.

K. Wolff, A. W. M. Hay, D. Raistrick, and R. Calvert, “Steady-state pharmacokinetics of methadone in opioid addicts,” European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 189–194, 1993.

R. E. Johnson, M. A. Chutuape, E. C. Strain, S. L. Walsh, M. L. Stitzer, and G. E. Bigelow, “A comparison of levomethadyl acetate, buprenorphine, and methadone for opioid dependence,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 343, no. 18, pp. 1290–1297, 2000.

N. Fairbairn, K. Hayashi, K. Kaplan et al., “Factors associated with methadone treatment among injection drug users in Bangkok, Thailand,” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 108–113, 2012.

M. Teesson, A. Havard, S. Fairbairn, J. Ross, M. Lynskey, and S. Darke, “Depression among entrants to treatment for heroin dependence in the Australian Treatment Outcome Study (ATOS): prevalence, correlates and treatment seeking,” Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 309–315, 2005.

A. Havard, M. Teesson, S. Darke, and J. Ross, “Depression among heroin users: 12-Month outcomes from the Australian Treatment Outcome Study (ATOS),” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 355–362, 2006.

R. S. Brienza, M. D. Stein, M.-H. Chen et al., “Depression among needle exchange program and methadone maintenance clients,” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 331–337, 2000.

R. D'Souza, M. J. Glynn, I. Ushiro-Lumb et al., “Prevalence of hepatitis C-related cirrhosis in elderly asian patients infected in childhood,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 910–917, 2005.

R. C. Kupers, H. Konings, H. Adriaensen, and J. M. Gybels, “Morphine differentially affects the sensory and affective pain ratings in neurogenic and idiopathic forms of pain,” Pain, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 5–12, 1991.

H.-Y. Lee, J.-H. Li, L.-T. Wu, J.-S. Wu, C.-F. Yen, and H.-P. Tang, “Survey of methadone-drug interactions among patients of methadone maintenance treatment program in Taiwan,” Substance Abuse, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 11, 2012.

J. Khalsa, S. Genser, F. Vocci, H. Francis, and P. Bean, “The challenging interactions between antiretroviral agents and addiction drugs,” American clinical laboratory, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 10–13, 2002.

P. M. Rainey, “HIV drug interactions: the good, the bad, and the other,” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 26–31, 2002.

E. D. Kharasch, D. Whittington, D. Ensign et al., “Mechanism of efavirenz influence on methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics,” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 673–684, 2012.

B. Lüthi, A. Huttner, R. F. Speck, and N. J. Mueller, “Methadone-induced Torsade de pointes after stopping lopinavir-ritonavir,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 367–369, 2007.

S. Crettol, J.-J. Déglon, J. Besson et al., “ABCB1 and cytochrome P450 genotypes and phenotypes: influence on methadone plasma levels and response to treatment,” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 668–681, 2006.

J. G. Gerber, R. J. Rhodes, and J. Gal, “Stereoselective metabolism of methadone N-demethylation by cytochrome P4502B6 and 2C19,” Chirality, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 2004.

Y. Li, J.-P. Kantelip, P. Gerritsen-Van Schieveen, and S. Davani, “Interindividual variability of methadone response: impact of genetic polymorphism,” Molecular Diagnosis and Therapy, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 109–124, 2008.

H. Bunten, W.-J. Liang, D. Pounder, C. Seneviratne, and M. D. Osselton, “CYP2B6 and OPRM1 gene variations predict methadone-related deaths,” Addiction Biology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 142–144, 2011.

J. K. Coller, D. T. Barratt, K. Dahlen, M. H. Loennechen, and A. A. Somogyi, “ABCB1 genetic variability and methadone dosage requirements in opioid-dependent individuals,” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 682–690, 2006.

Y. Chang, W. B. Fang, S.-N. Lin, and D. E. Moody, “Stereo-selective metabolism of methadone by human liver microsomes and cDNA-expressed cytochrome P450s: a reconciliation,” Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2011.

C. B. Eap, S. Crettol, J.-S. Rougier et al., “Stereoselective block of hERG channel by (S)-methadone and QT interval prolongation in CYP2B6 slow metabolizers,” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 719–728, 2007.

A. K. Elkader, B. Brands, E. Dunn, P. Selby, and B. A. Sproule, “Major depressive disorder and patient satisfaction in relation to methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in stabilized methadone maintenance patients,” Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 77–81, 2009.

K. Kristensen, C. B. Christensen, and L. L. Christrup, “The MU1, MU2, delta, kappa opioid receptor binding profiles of methadone stereoisomers and morphine,” Life Sciences, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. PL45–PL50, 1995.

T. Nanovskaya, I. Nekhayeva, N. Karunaratne, K. Audus, G. D. V. Hankins, and M. S. Ahmed, “Role of P-glycoprotein in transplacental transfer of methadone,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 1869–1878, 2005.

J.-S. Wang, Y. Ruan, R. M. Taylor, J. L. Donovan, J. S. Markowitz, and C. L. DeVane, “Brain penetration of methadone (R)- and (S)-enantiomers is greatly increased by P-glycoprotein deficiency in the blood-brain barrier of ABCB1a gene knockout mice,” Psychopharmacology, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 132–138, 2004.

C.-C. Hung, M.-H. Chiou, B.-H. Huang et al., “Impact of genetic polymorphisms in ABCB1, CYP2B6, OPRM1, ANKK1 and DRD2 genes on methadone therapy in Han Chinese Patients,” Pharmacogenomics, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1525–1533, 2011.

S.-C. Wang, I.-K. Ho, H.-H. Tsou et al., “CYP2B6 polymorphisms influence the plasma concentration and clearance of the methadone S-enantiomer,” Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 463–469, 2011.

S. Crettol, J.-J. Déglon, J. Besson et al., “Methadone enantiomer plasma levels, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, and CYP2C9 genotypes, and response to treatment,” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 593–604, 2005.

F. Fonseca, R. de la Torre, L. Díaz et al., “Contribution of cytochrome P450 and ABCB1 genetic variability on methadone pharmacokinetics, dose requirements, and response,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 5, Article ID e19527, 2011.

H.-Y. Lee, Y.-H. Yang, W.-J. Yu et al., “Essentiality of HIV testing and education for effective HIV control in the national pilot harm reduction program: the Taiwan experience,” Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 79–85, 2012.

Y.-M. A. Chen and S. H.-S. Kuo, “HIV-1 in Taiwan,” The Lancet, vol. 369, no. 9562, pp. 623–625, 2007.

M. Frost, H. Köhler, and G. Blaschke, “Enantioselective determination of methadone and its main metabolite 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) in serum, urine and hair by capillary electrophoresis,” Electrophoresis, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1026–1034, 1997.

O. Levran, E. Peles, S. Hamon, et al., “CYP2B6 SNPs are associated with methadone dose required for effective treatment of opioid addiction,” Addiction Biology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 709–716, 2013.

C. Marzolini, E. Paus, T. Buclin, and R. B. Kim, “Polymorphisms in human MDR1 (P-glycoprotein): recent advances and clinical relevance,” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 13–33, 2004.

B. R. Edlin, T. F. Kresina, D. B. Raymond et al., “Overcoming barriers to prevention, care, and treatment of hepatitis C in illicit drug users,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. S276–S285, 2005.

M. Schaefer and S. Mauss, “Hepatitis C treatment in patients with drug addiction: clinical management of interferon-alpha-associated psychiatric side effects,” Current drug abuse reviews, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 177–187, 2008.

I.-C. Chen, W.-C. Chie, H.-G. Hwu et al., “Alcohol use problem among patients in methadone maintenance treatment in Taiwan,” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 142–149, 2011.

J. Hillebrand, J. Marsden, E. Finch, and J. Strang, “Excessive alcohol consumption and drinking expectations among clients in methadone maintenance,” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 155–160, 2001.

P. Corsenac, E. Lagarde, B. Gadegbeku, et al., “Road traffic crashes and prescribed methadone and buprenorphine: a french registry-based case-control study,” Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 123, no. 1–3, pp. 91–97, 2011.

M. Stenbacka, O. Beck, A. Leifman, A. Romelsjö, and A. Helander, “Problem drinking in relation to treatment outcome among opiate addicts in methadone maintenance treatment,” Drug and Alcohol Review, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 55–63, 2007.

S. Assanangkornchai and J. G. Edwards, “Clinical and epidemiological assessment of substance misuse and psychiatric comorbidity,” Current Opinion in Psychiatry, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 187–193, 2012.

P. J. Carpentier, P. F. M. Krabbe, M. T. Van Gogh, L. J. M. Knapen, J. K. Buitelaar, and C. A. J. De Jong, “Psychiatric comorbidity reduces quality of life in chronic methadone maintained patients,” American Journal on Addictions, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 470–480, 2009.

I. Maremmani, O. Zolesi, M. Aglietti, G. Marini, A. Tagliamonte, and S. Maxwell, “Methadone dose and retention during treatment of heroin addicts with Axis I psychiatric comorbidity,” Journal of Addictive Diseases, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 29–41, 2000.

B. Brands, J. Blake, D. C. Marsh, B. Sproule, R. Jeyapalan, and S. Li, “The impact of benzodiazepine use on methadone maintenance treatment outcomes,” Journal of Addictive Diseases, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 37–48, 2008.

T. S. Lee, H. C. Shen, W. H. Wu, et al., “Clinical characteristics and risk behavior as a function of HIV status among heroin users enrolled in methadone treatment in northern Taiwan,” Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, vol. 8, no. 6, p. 6, 2011.

C. Lin and R. Detels, “A qualitative study exploring the reason for low dosage of methadone prescribed in the MMT clinics in China,” Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 45–49, 2011.

T. Lang, K. Klein, J. Fischer et al., “Extensive genetic polymorphism in the human CYP2B6 gene with impact on expression and function in human liver,” Pharmacogenetics, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 399–415, 2001.