BioMed Research International

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 350281, 7 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/350281

Research Article

Predictors of Poststroke Health-Related Quality of Life in Nigerian Stroke Survivors: A 1-Year Follow-Up Study

Ashiru Mohammad Hamza,¹ Nabilla Al-Sadat,¹ Siew Yim Loh,² and Nowrozy Kamar Jahan³

¹Center for Population Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

²Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Building, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

³SEACO/School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, 146 Jalan Sia Her Yam, Segamat District, 85000 Jahor State, Malaysia

Received 5 March 2014; Revised 5 May 2014; Accepted 12 May 2014; Published 28 May 2014

Academic Editor: Ching-Yi Wu

Copyright © 2014 Ashiru Mohammad Hamza et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

This study aims to identify the predictors in the different aspects of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and to measure the changes of functional status over time in a cohort of Nigerian stroke survivors. A prospective observational study was conducted in three hospitals of Kano state of Nigeria where stroke survivors receive rehabilitation. The linguistic-validated Hausa versions of the stroke impact scale 3.0, modified Rankin scale, Barthel index and Beck depression inventory scales were used. Paired samples -test was used to calculate the amount of changes that occur over time and the forward stepwise linear regression model was used to identify the predictors. A total of 233 stroke survivors were surveyed at 6 months, and 93% (217/233) were followed at 1 year after stroke. Functional disabilities were significantly reduced during the recovery phase. Motor impairment, disability, and level of depression were independent predictors of HRQoL in the multivariate regression analysis. The involvement of family members as caregivers is the key factor for those survivors with improved functional status. Thus, to enhance the quality of poststroke life, it is proposed that a holistic stroke rehabilitation service and an active involvement of family members are established at every possible level.

1. Introduction

Stroke-related mortality and morbidity in late adulthood continue to be a public health problem in many developing countries. Increasing prevalence of modifiable risk factors such as hypertension, obesity, and physical inactivity has contributed to the global burden of stroke which becomes one of the top three leading causes of adult death. Stroke along with other chronic diseases like cardiovascular, cancer, and diabetes will continue to augment the burden of chronic diseases in low and middle income countries [1–3]. Today, stroke has become one of the major contributors of disease burden of African countries [4–6]. Its prevalence has also started to increase in Nigeria, with prevalence of 1.14 per 1000 while a 30-day case fatality rate is as high as 40% [7]. Several hospital-based researches have found that stroke is one of the major neurological causes of admission and case fatality in Nigeria currently [8–11]. Nevertheless, due to improved treatment and management, stroke-related mortality is declining, leaving many survivors disabled [12, 13].

The impact of stroke on different dimensions of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of survivors varies during the recovery phase when an individual attempts to adjust to life. Hence, HRQoL has become one of the key indicators to measure the poststroke outcome. Assessment of HRQoL is multidimensional, focusing on physical, mental, functional, and social aspects. It is important to know how different dimensions of HRQoL vary over time among survivors. Even though, evidence on the consequences of stroke and its determinants on HRQoL among long term survivors had already been generated in developed country; research has been sparse in developing countries [14, 15].

Studies on stroke in Nigeria have included the estimation of the stroke prevalence in urban and rural settings [16–18] and the identification of the profile and determinants of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among stroke survivors [19, 20]. So far to our knowledge, no prospective longitudinal research has been conducted to measure the changes that occur within one year period in the different aspects of health-related quality of life among the Nigerian stroke survivors. Therefore, this study is aimed to measure specifically the changes that occur on different aspects of HRQoL and to identify the factors that predict those changes on their physical, mental, and social health during the recovery phase. The study findings are expected to generate evidence in support of developing effective health policy and strategy related to rehabilitation facilities and services for the stroke survivors who need support to maintain their optimal physical, mental, and social functional levels.

2. Methodology

A prospective longitudinal observational study was conducted in the department of Medicine and Physiotherapy of one teaching and two specialist hospitals of Kano state, one of the most populated states of northwestern Nigeria. These three hospitals treat and manage most of the referred stroke patients and provide rehabilitation service. Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of the University of Malaya, Malaysia (Ethics Committee/IRB Ref. number 830.7) and also from the Ministry of Health of Kano State, Nigeria (HMB/GEN/488/11) and Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital of Nigeria (AKTH/MAC/SUB/12A/P3/IV/801).

3. Study Population and Recruitment

Study respondents were patients with the diagnosis of stroke admitted into the hospitals between November 2010 and January 2011. Inclusion criteria are first-ever stroke patients, who were at the age of 18 years and above and were receiving rehabilitation services after their overall condition was stabilized. Patients with the history of recurrent stroke attacks and persistent deficits; with underlying psychotic and mental disorders; those who were handicapped before the stroke event; and the patients with comorbidities (e.g., heart failure, peritoneal or hemodialysis) that significantly affect the quality of life and limit life expectancy were excluded. Informed consent was received as much as possible from the patient but if there is aphasia, consent is obtained from the patient as well as the spouse or family member who is actively taking care of the patient and is defined as the proxy. The proxy then answered on behalf of the patient but in the presence of the patient.

4. Data Collection Instruments

Several validated well-developed tools were used in measurement of the changes: the stroke impact scale (SIS), the modified Rankin scale (mRS), Barthel index (BI), and the Beck depression iventory (BDI) [21–23]. The linguistic validated Hausa version of the stroke impact scale (SIS) version 3.0 which is a psychometrically robust 59-item stroke-specific self-reported measure was used to assess a number of physical, mental, and social dimensions of HRQoL [24]. Physical health was measured by four separate domains: strength, hand function, activities of daily living (ADL), and mobility; and these four domains were aggregated to create a composite “Physical domain.” Only the strength was rated in terms of “strength;” the other three physical dimensions were rated in terms of “amount of difficulty.” Mental health was measured by two domains: memory in terms of amount of difficulty and emotion in terms of frequency of events. The remaining two domains (social participation and communication) measured the participant’s social health. The SIS 3.0 also assessed the patient’s global perception of recovery, having the scores from 0 to 100 (where 0 score means no recovery and 100 meaning full recovery); hence the higher scores indicate the better HRQoL.

The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) assessed the degree of handicap as poststroke disability and measures the patient’s ability to carry out daily living activities and determined whether they need any assistance. The Barthel index (BI) assessed the physical functional status and performance in daily living activities; (Barthel index score ranges from 0 (total dependence) to 100 (total independence)). Beck depression inventory (BDI), a-21-item self-reported screening tool, was used to assess the state of depression in the stroke survivors. All the four above-mentioned specific scales were used to measure the changes that occur in different aspects of health-related quality of life of Nigerian stroke survivors at 6 months and one year after stroke through a face to face interview with the patients and/or proxies. The socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical characteristics were collected using a questionnaire, also from medical and nursing records and from the treating doctors when needed.

5. Data Analysis

The data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 20.0. Descriptive statistics summarized the socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical characteristics of the participants and presented them as number with percentages; only the variable age was presented as mean with standard deviation. Paired samples -test was used to calculate the amount of changes that occur in the physical, mental, and social health during the recovery phase. The forward stepwise linear regression model was used to identify the risk factors that predict the changes that occur in the physical, mental, and social dimension of health-related quality of life during recovery period. The value of is considered as the criterion for statistical significance.

In the regression model, the eight domains of stroke impact scale (SIS) and the composite physical domain were the dependent variables and the scores of the modified Rankin Scale, Barthel index, and Beck depression inventory were the independent variables. Socioeconomic and demographic variables such as age at the time of stroke, gender, religion, ethnicity, marital status, residency, education, occupation before and after stroke, income, who paid the hospital treatment expenditure, and status in the family and the clinical characteristics such as type of stroke, side of stroke, and caregiver during recovery phase were also the independent variables. In each regression analysis, the collinearity issue was also checked and only those predictors were included which are not highly correlated both at the 6 months and 1 year follow-up.

6. Results

Two hundred and thirty three stroke survivors participated in the study and they were surveyed at 6 months after stroke. Among them, 217 stroke survivors were followed up at 1 year. Table 1 presents the socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical characteristics of 233 stroke survivors. The mean age (in years) of the respondents was and they were almost equally distributed by gender (male 51%). More than half (60%) of the respondents were married and nearly three quarter (74%) were urban residents. More than half (53%) of the respondents did not have enough income and in almost half (48%) of the cases, the family members paid the hospital treatment cost.

Table 1: Socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical characteristics of the stroke survivors (n = 233).

Characteristics
Values

Age (years)

    Range
19 to 82

    Mean
58.76 ± 13.24

Gender

    Male
118 (50.6%)

    Female
115 (49.4%)

Marital status

    Single
5 (2.1%)

    Married
139 (59.7%)

    Widow/widower
70 (30%)

    Divorced/separated
19 (8.2%)

Residence

    Urban
172 (73.8%)

    Rural
61 (26.2%)

Income

    Enough and save
7 (3%)

    Just enough
101 (43.3%)

    Not enough
125 (53.6%)

Hospital treatment paid by

    Self-Support
63 (27%)

    Friends
16 (6.9%)

    Government support
1 (0.4%)

    Social security
10 (4.3%)

    Free
31 (13.3%)

    Family support
112 (48.1)

Type of stroke

    Ischemic
86 (36.9%)

    Hemorrhagic
24 (10.3%)

    Indeterminate
123 (52.8%)

Side of stroke

    Right
123 (52.8%)

    Left
110 (47.2%)

Caregiver during recovery phase

    Spouse
51 (21.9)

    Children
128 (54.9)

    In-law
2 (0.9)

    Brother/sister/parents
49 (21)

    Employer
3 (1.3)

More than half of the respondents were diagnosed to suffer indeterminate type of stroke due to lack of proper diagnostic facilities. Among the diagnosed cases, ischemic stroke was the most common (37%). Slightly more than half (53%) of the respondents had right sided stroke. The majority of the stroke survivors were taken care of by their children (55%) and their spouses (22%).

The mean of different scales which measures the changes in physical and mental health during recovery phase of stroke (from 6 months to 1 year) is summarized in Table 2.

Table 2: Changes in functional measures during recovery phase (6 months and one year after stroke).

Functional measure
Six months ()

mean ± SD
One Year ()

mean ± SD
Change

mean ± SD

Modified Rankin scale (MRS)***
3.3 ± 1.1
3.1 ± 1.1
−0.2 ± 0.5

Barthel index (BI)***
60.5 ± 25.1
68.5 ± 18.8
8.0 ± 8.7

Beck depression inventory (BDI)***
12.3 ± 5.0
10.3 ± 4.0
−2.1 ± 1.9

Level of significance of P value: *; **; and ***.

There are significant changes in all mean functional scores over the time period. The level of poststroke disability or dependence in performing daily life activities is significantly reduced which was measured by modified Rankin scale (mRS). Significant improvement in the activity daily living was also reflected in the BI scores. Both measurements indicate substantial improvement of physical health over the time period. Similar improvement was reflected in the score of BDI which suggests that the level of depression declined significantly from 6 months to 1 year after stroke. Table 3 shows the changes that occurred in different domains of stroke impact scales from 6 months to 1 year. Except for the “emotion” domain, all different aspects of physical, memory, thinking process, and social health significantly improved during recovery period. The decreased emotion domain may be due to the fact that greater emphasis in stroke rehabilitation in Nigeria was on physical health by Physiotherapists. Stroke survivors do not have access to effective rehabilitation care such as by the occupational therapist to help them overcome the emotional consequences of stroke.

Table 3: Changes in different dimensions of SIS during poststroke recovery phase.

Different dimensions of SIS
Six months

(n = 233)

mean ± SD
One year

(n = 217)

mean ± SD
Changes

mean ± SD

Strength***
33.6 ± 21.5
37.6 ± 18.4
4.0 ± 7.0

Hand function***
28.7 ± 25.1
31.2 ± 25.3
2.5 ± 5.4

ADL***
46.4 ± 24.8
52.2 ± 22.7
5.4 ± 5.1

Mobility***
49.8 ± 30.5
54.1 ± 27.6
3.6 ± 4.7

Composite physical***
39.9 ± 21.3
43.8 ± 19.7
3.9 ± 3.2

Memory and thinking*
80.3 ± 22.2
80.9 ± 20.0
0.7 ± 4.1

Emotion***
57.4 ± 12.3
54.3 ± 12.6
−3.1 ± 10.0

Communication***
78.4 ± 24.5
79.6 ± 21.8
1.2 ± 4.9

Participation**
39.8 ± 23.6
41.0 ± 22.4
1.2 ± 5.8

Global recovery***
57.2 ± 19.9
62.9 ± 15.2
5.7 ± 7.5

Level of significance of P value: *; **; and ***.

Table 4 presents the results of the forward stepwise linear regression models, both at 6 months and at 1 year. The adjusted values of the composite physical domain were significant in the two time periods. The level of independency on functional status and depression, the ability to pay the hospital treatment cost, and who is the caregiver explained 69% of the variance on the outcome.

Table 4: Predictors of stroke impact scale domains during poststroke recovery phase.

Stroke impact scale domains
Six months Follow-up
One year Follow-up

Standardized coefficient
Standard error
adjusted
Standardized coefficient
Standard error
adjusted

Strength

0.51

0.50

    Modified Rankin scale
−0.523***
1.067

−0.337***
1.424

    Beck depression inventory score
−0.265***
0.238

−0.149*
0.287

Hand function

0.33

0.36

    Barthel index
0.351***
0.061

0.402***
0.083

    Age
0.220**
0.123

0.285***
0.119

    Caregiver (spouse versus employer)
0.240**
4.453

0.236**
4.309

Activities of daily living (ADL)

0.64

0.63

    Barthel index
0.722***
0.040

0.625***
0.055

    Caregiver (spouse versus employer)
0.206***
2.599

    Caregiver (children versus employer)

−0.182***
2.034

    Hospital treatment charge (Self-support versus family support)
0.166***
2.259

0.132**
2.221

    Hospital treatment charge (social security versus family support)
−0.143**
5.001

−0.192***
4.615

Mobility

0.70

0.65

    Barthel index
0.825***
0.044

0.767***
0.060

    Income (enough and save versus not enough)
0.123**
6.369

    Hospital treatment charge (self-support versus family support)

0.143**
2.603

Composite physical domain

0.69

0.69

    Barthel index
0.650***
0.042

0.567***
0.069

    Caregiver (children versus employer)
−0.195***
1.768

−0.217***
1.657

    Hospital treatment charge (Social security versus family support)
−0.147***
3.915

−0.127**
3.743

    Beck depression inventory score
−0.184***
0.208

Memory and thinking

0.27

0.29

    Beck depression inventory score
−0.246***
0.284

−0.236***
0.324

    Caregiver (Spouse versus employer)
0.341***
3.485

0.183*
3.632

    Age
0.230**
0.115

0.179*
0.106

Emotion

0.29

0.29

    Beck depression inventory score
−0.317***
0.178

−0.217**
0.194

    Marital status (widow versus divorce)
−0.229***
1.592

−0.193**
1.672

    Hospital treatment charge (Self-support versus family support)
0.192**
1.651

0.227***
1.759

    Income (Just enough versus not enough)

0.220***
1.495

Communication

0.41

0.40

    Caregiver (children versus employer)
−0.271***
2.487

−0.230***
2.712

    Hospital treatment charge (social security versus family support)
−0.180**
5.709

−0.157**
6.430

Social participation

0.56

0.56

    Age
0.264***
0.088

0.173**
0.092

    Barthel index
0.382***
0.082

0.350***
0.096

    Modified Rankin scale
−0.305***
1.657

−0.234**
1.791

    Hospital treatment charge (Self-support versus family support)
0.245***
2.507

0.159**
2.492

Level of significance of P value: *; **; and ***.

A change in 1 standard deviation of Barthel index (level of independency on functional status) has six times higher impact on physical health. The level of depression and dependency on others to pay the hospital treatment cost significantly affect the physical health status.

Ability to carry out daily living activities improved twice in patients who attended the rehabilitation centre as early as possible and when the caregiver is the spouse who could provide physiotherapy even at home within 6 months after stroke; and this ability is deteriorated when the stroke survivors have to depend on their children who are either not capable of taking care of them or cannot manage time to provide care to restore their functional life even after 1 year. Negative significant association exits between the level of depression and mental health, especially memory, thinking process, and emotion. Mental health was also affected by their economic condition and social disadvantage position such as a status of being a widow. The variables which measure the mental health in this study only can explain 29% of the variance of the outcome. There is significant association between the level of disability and functional status with social participation. Increased degree of disability reduced the social participation rate. Patients, who depend on social security to pay the hospital treatment cost and on children for care, are worse in communication.

7. Discussion

The study found significant improvement in functional disability among stroke survivors during recovery phase. Similar findings had been found in other studies [20, 25–28]. This has become common in many developed countries. like in USA, where the majority of stroke survivors receive rehabilitation care within 6 months after stroke to have the maximum possible level of independence [29]. A clinical trial research found that success of stroke rehabilitation depends on its early commencement, as soon as the survivor is medically stable and free from life threatening conditions [30]. It is already proven that stroke rehabilitation proved to be effective in improving functional outcomes and associated disability and mental depression [31–33]. Though this study could not identify how early the stroke survivors started to receive rehabilitation, it is realized that the Nigerian stroke survivors did obtain substantial benefits from poststroke rehabilitation which helped them to recover and to readjust with the changes. The study finding emphasizes the necessity for arranging early intervention to optimize the recoveries and rehabilitation for Nigerian stroke survivors.

Our study also found that involvement of the patients’ spouse as the caregiver significantly improves the functional and mental status of the survivors. This finding corresponds with other study findings where the success of patient’s self-management depends on the active partnership with key family member or caregivers [34, 35]. It is suggested that caregivers attend the rehabilitation sessions together with the survivors to actively manage and support the survivors at home. These sessions will allow the caregivers to remain informed about the patient’s progress and to learn how to help the survivors at home to improve their physical, mental, and social functions.

Significant improvement in QOL was found except within the emotional domain. This is consistent with findings by [27, 36]. The stroke survivors could not overcome the emotional consequence of stroke even after 1 year which indicates the lack of emotional rehabilitation. This scenario was also described in developed countries decades ago [37]. Thus, the findings suggested including occupational therapists as direct-care providers, apart from physiotherapists, since they can place greater emphasis on objectifying the emotional consequences of stroke [38]. Occupational therapist can help them overcome the emotional consequences of stroke like frustration, dissatisfaction, and loss of confidence by giving them support to return to work [38]. Interdisciplinary partnership is recommended where all related health professionals including key specialists like physiotherapists and occupational therapists should collaborate as proactive health providers with key family members to ensure a comprehensive and early stroke rehabilitation program for effective poststroke recovery. This recommendation is in line with other research evidence [39] where interdisciplinary team approach was found effective in rehabilitation to help the disabled survivors to regain strength and range of movement, as well as to relearn the old skills or learn the new skills to carry out their daily living activities towards independent living.

Another finding is the relationship of emotional status to the lack of financial and social support. It is thus suggested to make the services freely available and accessible to all types of stroke survivors to avoid the emotional deterioration among the stroke survivors over time. Governments should develop effective health policy and strategy to promote early rehabilitation for stroke survivors to give them the better quality of life. Multidisciplinary specialist teams should be available at both inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation centers within hospitals and at the community. Generally, all doctors and nurses should receive specific training in poststroke rehabilitation. The role of occupational therapy should receive proper attention in the Nigeria health system. Community and home-based rehabilitation facilities and care should be available for those who are unable to move out of home. Effective public health interventions aimed to reduce the prevalence of modifiable risk factors and to prevent further stroke need to be designed. The study reinforces the need for governments of low income developing countries like Nigeria which are going through epidemiological transition to get ready in advance to tackle this emerging situation.

8. Conclusion

Stroke, due to its nature of sudden onset, usually leaves the individual and the family in an ill-prepared position to deal with its residual impairment in physical, mental, and social functions. Poststroke survival rate is anticipated to increase in developing countries due to better treatment and management; hence it generates the necessity for arranging rehabilitation for stroke survivors in order to give them the best possible quality of life. Key players must be involved in the interdisciplinary care together in partnership with family level caregiver to play the integral roles to improve physical and emotional health. Additional research on how religiosity, health care systems, and community factors influence the rehabilitation progress is warranted. Further research is also needed to identify those who are at risk of having early rehabilitation.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the University of Malaya Postgraduate Research Grant for supporting them with the funds to conduct this study (Project number: PS034-2012A). They are also grateful to the staff and the volunteered stroke patients of the Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital and Murtala Mohammad Specialist Hospital, Nigeria for their active involvement in the study. They would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their insightful reviews.

References

A. Kalache and I. Aboderin, “Stroke: the global burden,” Health Policy and Planning, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 1995.

D. O. Abegunde, C. D. Mathers, T. Adam, M. Ortegon, and K. Strong, “The burden and costs of chronic diseases in low-income and middle-income countries,” The Lancet, vol. 370, no. 9603, pp. 1929–1938, 2007.

S. C. Johnston, S. Mendis, and C. D. Mathers, “Global variation in stroke burden and mortality: estimates from monitoring, surveillance, and modelling,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 345–354, 2009.

G. A. Mensah, “Epidemiology of stroke and high blood pressure in Africa,” Heart, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 697–705, 2008.

M. D. Connor, R. Walker, G. Modi, and C. P. Warlow, “Burden of stroke in black populations in sub-Saharan Africa,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 269–278, 2007.

A. P. Kengne and C. S. Anderson, “The neglected burden of stroke in Sub-Saharan Africa,” International Journal of Stroke, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 180–190, 2006.

K. W. Wahab, “The burden of stroke in Nigeria,” International Journal of Stroke, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 290–292, 2008.

S. A. Bwala, “Stroke in a subsaharan Nigerian hospital—a retrospective study,” Tropical Doctor, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 11–14, 1989.

S. A. Ogun, F. I. Ojini, B. Ogungbo, K. O. Kolapo, and M. A. Danesi, “Stroke in south west Nigeria: a 10-year review,” Stroke, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1120–1122, 2005.

O. O. Desalu, K. W. Wahab, B. Fawale et al., “A review of stroke admissions at a tertiary hospital in rural Southwestern Nigeria,” Annals of African Medicine, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 80–85, 2011.

K. W. Wahab, P. O. Okokhere, A. J. Ugheoke, O. Oziegbe, A. F. Asalu, and T. A. Salami, “Awareness of warning signs among suburban Nigerians at high risk for stroke is poor: a cross-sectional study,” BMC Neurology, vol. 8, article 18, 2008.

A. E. Kunst, M. Amiri, and F. Janssen, “The decline in stroke mortality: exploration of future trends in 7 Western European Countries,” Stroke, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 2126–2130, 2011.

I. Vaartjes, M. O'Flaherty, S. Capewell, J. Kappelle, and M. Bots, “Remarkable decline in ischemic stroke mortality is not matched by changes in incidence,” Stroke, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 591–597, 2013.

M. L. Hackett, J. R. Duncan, C. S. Anderson, J. B. Broad, and R. Bonita, “Health-related quality of life among long-term survivors of stroke: results from the Auckland stroke study, 1991-1992,” Stroke, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 440–447, 2000.

G. Gosman-Hedström, L. Claesson, and C. Blomstrand, “Consequences of severity at stroke onset for health-related quality of life (HRQL) and informal care: a 1-year follow-up in elderly stroke survivors,” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 79–91, 2008.

M. Danesi, N. Okubadejo, and F. Ojini, “Prevalence of stroke in an urban, mixed-income community in Lagos, Nigeria,” Neuroepidemiology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 216–223, 2007.

A. C. Longe and B. O. Osuntokun, “Prevalence of neurological disorders in Udo, a rural community in southern Nigeria,” Tropical and Geographical Medicine, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 36–40, 1989.

B. O. Osuntokun, A. O. G. Adeuja, B. S. Schoenberg et al., “Neurological disorders in Nigerian Africans: a community-based study,” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 1987.

M. O. Owolabi and A. Ogunniyi, “Profile of health-related quality of life in Nigerian stroke survivors,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 54–62, 2009.

M. O. Owolabi, “Determinants of health-related quality of life in Nigerian stroke survivors,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 102, no. 12, pp. 1219–1225, 2008.

D. Cioncoloni, P. Piu, R. Tassi et al., “Relationship between the modified Rankin Scale and the Barthel Index in the process of functional recovery after stroke,” NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 315–322, 2012.

G. Sulter, C. Steen, and J. de Keyser, “Use of the Barthel Index and modified Rankin Scale in acute stroke trials,” Stroke, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1538–1541, 1999.

P. Richter, J. Werner, A. Heerlein, A. Kraus, and H. Sauer, “On the validity of the Beck Depression Inventory. A review,” Psychopathology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 160–168, 1998.

P. W. Duncan, R. K. Bode, S. M. Lai, and S. Perera, “Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the stroke impact scale,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 84, no. 7, pp. 950–963, 2003.

S. A. Abubakar and S. A. Isezuo, “Health related quality of life of stroke survivors: experience of a stroke unit,” International Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 183–187, 2012.

F. J. Carod-Artal, “Determining quality of life in stroke survivors,” Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 199–211, 2012.

F. J. Carod-Artal, D. S. Trizotto, L. F. Coral, and C. M. Moreira, “Determinants of quality of life in Brazilian stroke survivors,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 284, no. 1-2, pp. 63–68, 2009.

E. Gurcay, A. Bal, and A. Cakci, “Health-related quality of life in first-ever stroke patients,” Annals of Saudi Medicine, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 36–40, 2009.

A. J. Lee, J. Huber, and W. B. Stason, “Poststroke rehabilitation in older Americans: the Medicare experience,” Medical Care, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 811–825, 1996.

K. J. Ottenbacher and S. Jannell, “The results of clinical trials in stroke rehabilitation research,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 37–44, 1993.

W.-H. Hou, H.-W. Liang, C.-L. Hsieh, C.-Y. Hou, P.-C. Wen, and C.-Y. Li, “Effects of stroke rehabilitation on incidence of poststroke depression: a population-based cohort study,” Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 74, no. 9, pp. e859–e866, 2013.

Y.-W. Hsieh, K.-C. Lin, C.-Y. Wu, et al., “Predicting clinically significant changes in motor and functional outcomes after robot-assisted stroke rehabilitation,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 316–321, 2014.

E. R. Skidmore, D. R. Dawson, E. M. Whyte, et al., “Developing complex interventions: lessons learned from a pilot study examining strategy training in acute stroke rehabilitation,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 378–387, 2014.

A.-M. Rosland, M. Heisler, H.-J. Choi, M. J. Silveira, and J. D. Piette, “Family influences on self-management among functionally independent adults with diabetes or heart failure: do family members hinder as much as they help?” Chronic Illness, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 22–33, 2010.

J. Newbould, D. Taylor, and M. Bury, “Lay-led self-management in chronic illness: a review of the evidence,” Chronic Illness, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 249–261, 2006.

P. J. Clarke, J. M. Lawrence, and S. E. Black, “Changes in quality of life over the first year after stroke: findings from the Sunnybrook stroke study,” Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 121–127, 2000.

G. Gillen, “Coping during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: an exploratory study,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 136–145, 2006.

L. Gilbertson and P. Langhorne, “Home-based occupational therapy: stroke patients' satisfaction with occupational performance and service provision,” British Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 464–468, 2000.

M. Körner, “Interprofessional teamwork in medical rehabilitation: a comparison of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary team approach,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 745–755, 2010.