BioMed Research International

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 380316, 9 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/380316

Research Article

Cholesterol Assimilation by Lactobacillus Probiotic Bacteria: An In Vitro Investigation

Catherine Tomaro-Duchesneau,¹ Mitchell L. Jones,1,2 Divya Shah,¹ Poonam Jain,¹ Shyamali Saha,1,3 and Satya Prakash¹

¹Biomedical Technology and Cell Therapy Research Laboratory, Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Physiology, and Artificial Cells and Organs Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 3775 University Street, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3A 2B4

²Micropharma Limited, 4200 Saint Laurent Boulevard, Unit 409, Montreal, QC, Canada, H2W 2R2

³Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3A 0C7

Received 7 February 2014; Accepted 20 August 2014; Published 11 September 2014

Academic Editor: Esteban Martinez

Copyright © 2014 Catherine Tomaro-Duchesneau et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Excess cholesterol is associated with cardiovascular diseases (CVD), an important cause of mortality worldwide. Current CVD therapeutic measures, lifestyle and dietary interventions, and pharmaceutical agents for regulating cholesterol levels are inadequate. Probiotic bacteria have demonstrated potential to lower cholesterol levels by different mechanisms, including bile salt hydrolase activity, production of compounds that inhibit enzymes such as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A, and cholesterol assimilation. This work investigates 11 Lactobacillus strains for cholesterol assimilation. Probiotic strains for investigation were selected from the literature: Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 11951, L. reuteri NCIMB 701359, L. reuteri NCIMB 702655, L. reuteri NCIMB 701089, L. reuteri NCIMB 702656, Lactobacillus fermentum NCIMB 5221, L. fermentum NCIMB 8829, L. fermentum NCIMB 2797, Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 53103 GG, Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 314, and Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 14917. Cholesterol assimilation was investigated in culture media and under simulated intestinal conditions. The best cholesterol assimilator was L. plantarum ATCC 14917 (15.18 ± 0.55 mg/10¹⁰ cfu) in MRS broth. L. reuteri NCIMB 701089 assimilated over 67% (2254.70 ± 63.33 mg/10¹⁰ cfu) of cholesterol, the most of all the strains, under intestinal conditions. This work demonstrates that probiotic bacteria can assimilate cholesterol under intestinal conditions, with L. reuteri NCIMB 701089 showing great potential as a CVD therapeutic.

1. Introduction

Early studies by Anitschkow demonstrated that cholesterol administration results in symptoms of atherosclerosis [1], contributing to the lipid hypothesis, formulated by Duff and McMillan, which proposed an association between cholesterol and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) [2]. CVD are the leading cause of global mortality and morbidity and kill an estimated 16.7 million people worldwide [3]. Coronary artery disease (CAD), the most common CVD, is the leading cause of death and accounts for 7.25 million deaths globally [4]. The first line of treatment for CAD, dietary and lifestyle interventions, has proven inadequate. Pharmacological agents are being administered to target elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels [5, 6], including 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins), fibric acids, high-density lipoprotein stimulators (nicotinic acids), cholesterol absorption inhibitors (ezetimibe), and bile acid sequestrants. These pharmaceutics, however, have important limitations, with only 38% of dyslipidemia and 18% of CAD patients attaining the National Cholesterol Education Program goals [7]. Statins, the fundamental therapy for reducing LDL levels [8], fail to allow the majority of patients to meet their lipid goals [7, 9, 10]. There is a dire need for additional therapeutic modalities to lower cholesterol levels.

There has been increasing interest in probiotics, “microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host,” research for the development of biotherapeutics [11, 12]. In recent years, attention has been given to the ability of probiotic cells to reduce lipids and cholesterol levels [13], with several proposed mechanisms of action. One mechanism, bile salt hydrolase activity, is described in a recent review [14]. In addition, bacteria have been reported to assimilate cholesterol [15, 16], thereby lowering luminal cholesterol levels available for absorption. Moreover, Lactobacillus bacteria can produce ferulic acid (FA) [17, 18], which can inhibit hepatic HMG-CoA reductase and promote the excretion of acidic sterol [19]. With the demonstrated cholesterol-lowering properties of probiotic bacteria, further research is required to investigate the mechanism(s) by which the bacteria decrease cholesterol levels and to select bacteria capable of exerting cholesterol-lowering effects.

The goal of the presented work is to investigate Lactobacillus strains for their potential to assimilate cholesterol in both bacterial media and under simulated gastrointestinal conditions. This work provides grounds for future investigations to select a probiotic bacterial strain as a cholesterol-lowering therapeutic.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Growth Media and Chemicals

De Man-Rogosa-Sharpe (MRS) broth was purchased from Fisher Scientific and prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cholesterol-polyethylene glycol (PEG) 600 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Oakville, ON, Canada). Water was purified with an EASYpure Reverse Osmosis System and a NANOpure Diamond Life Science (UV/UF) ultrapure water system from Barnstead Scientific Instrumentation (Dubuque, IA, USA). All other chemicals were of analytical or HPLC grade and purchased from commercial sources.

2.2. Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

The bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Lactobacillus fermentum NCIMB 5221, Lactobacillus fermentum NCIMB 2797, Lactobacillus fermentum NCIMB 8829, Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 701359, Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 11951, Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 701089, Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 702656, and Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 702655 were purchased from the National Collection of Industrial, Food and Marine Bacteria (NCIMB, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK). Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 53103 GG, Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 314, and Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 14917 were purchased from Cedarlane Labs (Burlington, ON, Canada). All strains were kept as frozen stocks and stored at −80°C in MRS broth containing 20% (v/v) glycerol. Prior to any assay, a MRS-agar plate was streaked from the frozen stock to ensure purity and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO₂ for 24 h. One colony from the agar plate was used to inoculate 10 mL MRS broth which was then incubated at 37°C for 24 h, prior to any experimental assay. Bacterial cell viabilities were determined using standard colony counting methods. Briefly, 10-fold serial dilutions were prepared using 0.85% (w/v) NaCl. Diluted bacterial samples were streaked on MRS-agar plates which were then incubated at 37°C and 5% CO₂ for 48 h. Colonies were counted from each plate and the colony forming units (cfu) were recorded. All viability tests were performed in triplicate to ensure accuracy and reproducibility.

Table 1: Probiotic bacteria selected for investigations into cholesterol assimilation based on previous cholesterol-lowering work.

Bacterial species
Strain
Reference(s)

Lactobacillus reuteri
NCIMB 11951
[14, 20]

NCIMB 701359

NCIMB 702655

NCIMB 701089

NCIMB 702656

Lactobacillus fermentum
NCIMB 5221
[21]

NCIMB 8829

NCIMB 2797

Lactobacillus rhamnosus
GG ATCC 53103
[22]

Lactobacillus acidophilus
ATCC 314
[23–25]

Lactobacillus plantarum
ATCC 14917
[26–29]

2.3. Determining Probiotic Cholesterol Assimilation in MRS

The probiotic Lactobacillus strains were investigated for their capability to assimilate cholesterol in MRS broth. Cholesterol-PEG 600 was added to MRS broth at a final concentration of 100 μg/mL. A 1% (v/v) inoculum of each overnight probiotic culture was added to MRS-cholesterol-PEG 600 and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Following incubation, viability was measured by standard colony counting methods. For cholesterol analysis, the probiotic suspensions were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C using a Napco 2028R centrifuge (Fisher Scientific, Ottawa, ON, Canada) and the supernatants containing nonassimilated cholesterol were collected.

Cholesterol concentrations in the different suspensions were determined using a protocol modified from Rudel and Morris [30]. Briefly, 500 μL of 33% (w/v) KOH and 1 mL absolute ethanol were added to 500 μL of the samples. The solutions were then vortexed for 1 min and incubated at 37°C for 15 min followed by cooling to room temperature. For phase separation, 1 mL of deionized water and 1.5 mL of hexanes were added to the solutions and vortexed for 1 min. The phases were then allowed to separate at room temperature. Subsequently, 500 μL of the hexane layer was transferred into a glass tube and the solvent was evaporated under a flow of nitrogen gas. Once dried, 1 mL of 50 mg/dL o-phthalaldehyde reagent prepared in acetic acid was added and the samples were mixed. Following mixing, 250 μL of concentrated H₂SO₄ was added to each tube and the solutions were vortexed for 1 min, followed by incubation for 20 min at room temperature. The resulting absorbance was read at 570 nm using a UV spectrophotometer Victor3 V 1420 Multilabel Counter (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA, USA). A standard curve of absorbance versus cholesterol concentrations was generated using the cholesterol concentrations: 0, 3.91, 7.81, 15.63, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, and 500 μg/mL cholesterol in MRS .

The cholesterol assimilated by probiotic Lactobacillus strains was determined as follows:

Cholesterol assimilated by each Lactobacillus strain was also calculated in terms of percent cholesterol assimilation:

Cholesterol assimilated by each Lactobacillus strain was calculated considering a dose of 10¹⁰ cells:

Samples and standards were tested in triplicate to ensure accuracy and reproducibility.

2.4. Determining Probiotic Cholesterol Assimilation under Simulated Intestinal Conditions

The Lactobacillus strains were investigated for their capability to assimilate cholesterol under simulated intestinal conditions. Simulated intestinal fluid was prepared according to US Pharmacopeia, with modifications [31]. Briefly, simulated intestinal fluid consisted of 0.85% (w/v) NaCl, 6.8 g/L potassium phosphate monobasic, 1.5 g/L Oxgall, 3.5 g/L glucose, and 10 g/L pancreatin. The pH was adjusted to 6.8 by the addition of 2 M NaOH.

Cholesterol-PEG 600 was added to the simulated intestinal fluid at a final concentration of 100 μg/mL. A 1% (v/v) inoculum of each overnight probiotic culture was added to the simulated intestinal fluid. The tubes were then incubated at 37°C for 24 h on a rotary shaker set at 100 rpm. Following a 24-hour incubation, viability was determined by standard colony counting methods. For cholesterol analysis, the probiotic suspensions were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C to collect the supernatant. Cholesterol assimilation was determined, as previously described. A standard curve of absorbance versus cholesterol concentrations in simulated intestinal fluid was generated using the concentrations: 0, 3.91, 7.81, 15.63, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, and 500 μg/mL cholesterol . Samples and standards were tested in triplicate to ensure accuracy and reproducibility.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Experimental results are expressed as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS Version 17.0 (Statistical Product and Service Solutions, IBM Corporation, New York, NY, USA). Linear regression was performed for generating standard curves. Statistical comparisons were carried out using the general linear model, followed by multiple comparisons of the means using Tukey’s post hoc analysis. Statistical significance was set at and P values less than 0.01 were considered highly significant.

3. Results

3.1. Cholesterol Assimilation in MRS

The capability of 11 probiotic Lactobacillus strains to assimilate cholesterol in MRS media was determined. The viability (expressed as cfu/mL) of the probiotic cells was investigated upon incubation with 100 µg/mL water-soluble cholesterol-PEG 600 in MRS. All probiotic cells under investigation were viable after incubation with cholesterol in the growth media for 24 h at 37°C, as shown in Figure 1(a). The cell viability ranged from 2.87 ± 0.176 × 10⁷ cfu/mL for L. plantarum ATCC 14917 to 1.18 ± 0.0504 × 10⁹ cfu/mL for L. reuteri NCIMB 701359. All the strains investigated were successful () at assimilating cholesterol following 24 h of incubation in cholesterol-containing MRS, as seen in Figure 1(b). The control sample, containing no probiotic, demonstrated no cholesterol assimilation, as expected. Six Lactobacillus strains (subset “a” determined by Tukey’s pairwise comparison) were shown to be significantly the best () at assimilating cholesterol in MRS: L. reuteri NCIMB 702656 (59.94 ± 7.49 μg/mL), L. fermentum NCIMB 8829 (55.44 ± 2.29 μg/mL), L. acidophilus ATCC 314 (48.45 ± 2.13 μg/mL), L. rhamnosus GG ATCC 53103 (46.09 ± 6.19 μg/mL), L. fermentum NCIMB 2797 (43.79 ± 1.04 μg/mL), and L. plantarum ATCC 14917 (43.52 ± 1.59 μg/mL). The strains with the least cholesterol assimilation (subset “d”) were L. reuteri NCIMB 11951 (20.18 ± 5.55 μg/mL), L. reuteri NCIMB 701359 (22.49 ± 1.76 μg/mL), L. reuteri NCIMB 702655 (30.07 ± 2.23 μg/mL), L. reuteri NCIMB 701089 (32.10 ± 3.75 μg/mL), and L. fermentum NCIMB 5221 (36.21 ± 3.1 μg/mL).

(a)

(b)

Figure 1: (a) Viability and (b) cholesterol assimilation of probiotic Lactobacillus in MRS containing 100 μg/mL of cholesterol, following 24 h of incubation. Data is represented as means ± SEM, . Tukey’s homogeneous subsets generated from pairwise comparisons are represented as a, b, c, d, and e, with “a” representing the most significant subset from control.

The amount of cholesterol assimilated by the probiotic Lactobacillus strains in terms of a dose of 10¹⁰ cells was calculated. The results indicate that all of the strains significantly () assimilated cholesterol, in terms of mg cholesterol assimilated per 10¹⁰ cells in MRS, as shown in Table 2. The results obtained, when bacterial cell counts were taken into account, were different from those previously described. Indeed, when normalized for viability counts, one probiotic strain, L. plantarum ATCC 14917, assimilated the most cholesterol, with 15.18 ± 0.55 mg of cholesterol assimilated per 10¹⁰ cells (, subset “a”). The Lactobacillus strains that assimilated the least cholesterol, in terms of assimilation by 10¹⁰ cfu (subset “e”), were L. reuteri NCIMB 11951 (0.33 ± 0.09 mg/10¹⁰ cfu), L. reuteri NCIMB 701359 (0.19 ± 0.02 mg/10¹⁰ cfu), L. reuteri NCIMB 702655 (0.96 ± 0.07 mg/10¹⁰ cfu), L. reuteri NCIMB 701089 (0.99 ± 0.12 mg/10¹⁰ cfu), L. fermentum NCIMB 8829 (1.16 ± 0.05 mg/10¹⁰ cfu), L. rhamnosus ATCC 53103 GG (0.52 ± 0.07 mg/10¹⁰ cfu), and L. acidophilus ATCC 314 (1.79 ± 0.08 mg/10¹⁰ cfu).

Table 2: Percent cholesterol assimilation by Lactobacillus strains in MRS containing 100 g/mL of cholesterol-PEG 600 for 24 h and the amount of cholesterol assimilation expected in a probiotic dose containing 10¹⁰ cells.

Probiotic strain
Cholesterol assimilated (%)
Cholesterol assimilated (mg/10¹⁰ cfu)

Control (no probiotic)
0.00 ± 1.11
—

L. reuteri  NCIMB 11951
13.13 ± 3.61
0.33 ± 0.09e

L. reuteri  NCIMB 701359
14.63 ± 1.14
0.19 ± 0.02e

L. reuteri  NCIMB 702655
19.55 ± 1.45
0.96 ± 0.07d,e

L. reuteri  NCIMB 701089
20.87 ± 2.44
0.99 ± 0.12d,e

L. reuteri  NCIMB 702656
38.99 ± 4.87
2.09 ± 0.26d

L. fermentum  NCIMB 5221
23.55 ± 2.05
10.45 ± 0.91b

L. fermentum  NCIMB 8829
36.06 ± 1.49
1.16 ± 0.05d,e

L. fermentum  NCIMB 2797
28.48 ± 0.68
3.81 ± 0.09c

L. rhamnosus  ATCC 53103 GG
29.98 ± 4.03
0.52 ± 0.07d,e

L. acidophilus  ATCC 314
31.51 ± 1.39
1.79 ± 0.08d,e

L.  plantarum  ATCC 14917
28.3 ± 1.03
15.18 ± 0.55a

Data is expressed as mean ± SEM, . Tukey’s homogeneous subsets generated from pairwise comparisons are represented as a, b, c, d, and e, with “a” representing the most significant subset from control.

3.2. Cholesterol Assimilation under Simulated Intestinal Conditions

The Lactobacillus strains were further investigated for their capability to assimilate cholesterol under simulated intestinal conditions. The viability of the probiotic Lactobacillus strains was investigated upon incubation with 100 μg/mL water-soluble cholesterol-PEG 600 in simulated intestinal fluid. Following 24 h of incubation at 37°C, all the probiotic cells under investigation were found to be viable, as shown in Figure 2(a). Specifically, the bacterial cell viability ranged from 1 × 10⁵ ± 0.01 × 10⁵ cfu/mL for L. plantarum ATCC 14917 to 1.41 × 10⁷ ± 0.046 × 10⁷ cfu/mL for L. reuteri NCIMB 11951. In terms of cholesterol assimilation, the control, containing no probiotic, demonstrated no cholesterol assimilation, as expected. All the strains of Lactobacillus under investigation, except L. rhamnosus ATCC 53103 GG (−0.43 ± 0.61 μg/mL), were successful (P < 0.001) at assimilating cholesterol (expressed as μg/mL), as demonstrated in Figure 2(b). Three Lactobacillus strains (subset “a”) were shown to be significantly the best (P < 0.05) at assimilating cholesterol under simulated intestinal conditions: L. reuteri NCIMB 11951 (35.36 ± 0.72 μg/mL), L. reuteri NCIMB 701089 (37.58 ± 1.06 μg/mL), and L. acidophilus ATCC 314 (41.20 ± 1.92 μg/mL).

(a)  

(b)

Figure 2: (a) Viability and (b) cholesterol assimilation of probiotic Lactobacillus in simulated intestinal fluid containing 100 μg/mL of cholesterol, following 24 h of incubation. Data is represented as means ± SEM, . Tukey’s homogeneous subsets generated from pairwise comparisons are represented as a, b, c, d, e, and f, with “a” representing the most significant subset from control.

Similar to the studies in MRS broth, the amount of cholesterol assimilated by the probiotic Lactobacillus strains in terms of a dose of 10¹⁰ cells following 24 h of incubation under simulated conditions was calculated, as shown in Table 3. Indeed, when bacterial cell counts of each strain are accounted for, the best strains are different from those previously described. However, the results indicate that all of the strains significantly () assimilated cholesterol, in terms of mg cholesterol assimilated per 10¹⁰ cells under simulated intestinal conditions, except for L. rhamnosus ATCC 53103 GG (−14.19 ± 20.39 mg of cholesterol assimilated per 10¹⁰ cells). One probiotic strain, L. reuteri NCIMB 701089 (, subset “a”), demonstrated the most assimilation, when cholesterol assimilation is normalized for viability counts, with 2254.70 ± 63.33 mg of cholesterol assimilated per 10¹⁰ cells.

Table 3: Percent cholesterol assimilation by Lactobacillus strains in simulated intestinal fluid containing 100 g/mL of cholesterol-PEG 600 for 24 h and the amount of cholesterol assimilation expected in a probiotic dose containing 10¹⁰ cells.

Probiotic strain
Cholesterol assimilated (%)
Cholesterol assimilated (mg/10¹⁰ cfu)

Control (no probiotic)
0.00 ± 1.87
—

L. reuteri  NCIMB 11951
63.24 ± 1.29
25.02 ± 0.51c

L. reuteri  NCIMB 701359
50.77 ± 1.67
139.63 ± 4.59c

L. reuteri  NCIMB 702655
52.69 ± 2.42
803.62 ± 36.85b

L. reuteri  NCIMB 701089
67.20 ± 1.89
2254.70 ± 63.33a

L. reuteri  NCIMB 702656
51.79 ± 1.52
20.94 ± 0.61c

L. fermentum  NCIMB 5221
11.51 ± 1.44
137.94 ± 17.29c

L. fermentum  NCIMB 8829
37.19 ± 4.99
43.62 ± 5.85c

L. fermentum  NCIMB 2797
40.84 ± 1.90
236.24 ± 10.98c

L. rhamnosus  ATCC 53103 GG
−0.76 ± 1.09
−14.19 ± 20.39c

L. acidophilus  ATCC 314
73.67 ± 3.43
247.17 ± 11.51c

L.  plantarum  ATCC 14917
20.54 ± 3.85
1148.50 ± 215.32b

Data is expressed as mean ± SEM, . Tukey’s homogeneous subsets generated from pairwise comparisons are represented as a, b, and c, with “a” representing the most significant subset from control.

4. Discussion

The risk of developing CAD, the leading cause of death, is directly associated with elevated cholesterol levels. With the increasing prevalence of CAD and the lack of a successful therapeutic, there is an important need for a novel therapeutic approach. Recent work on the gut microbiome has led to investigations of probiotic formulations for health disorders, including metabolic syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and allergies [11, 21, 32, 33]. Probiotic bacteria are advantageous as they are naturally found in foods such as yoghurt, are inexpensive, and are generally regarded as safe (GRAS). Of interest are the recent results demonstrating that probiotic bacteria have significant cholesterol-lowering properties [14, 21]. The hypocholesterolemic effects of probiotic bacteria have been linked to intrinsic bile salt hydrolase activity [14], cholesterol assimilation and incorporation in cellular membranes [15, 16], and the production of compounds, such as FA [17, 18], that can inhibit the activity of enzymes, including HMG-CoA reductase [19]. Cholesterol assimilation by probiotic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract would allow for the reduction of cholesterol absorption by enterocytes and excretion of the cholesterol from the host, as depicted in Figure 3. This would, in turn, lead to a decreased risk of developing CAD. The goal of the presented work was to investigate probiotic strains for their ability to assimilate cholesterol from bacterial culture media, as well as under simulated intestinal conditions.

(a)  

(b)

Figure 3: Schematic representation of probiotic cholesterol assimilation mechanism. (a) Cholesterol absorption by the intestinal enterocytes increases cardiovascular disease risks. (b) Probiotic administration enhances cholesterol assimilation, leading to the excretion of nonmetabolized cholesterol and other lipid molecules decreasing cardiovascular disease risks.

Previous groups have demonstrated that certain probiotic bacterial strains can assimilate cholesterol [34, 35]. Screening for cholesterol-lowering properties, in vitro, has become an important criterion in the selection of bacterial strains for in vivo probiotic investigations. We investigated Lactobacillus strains, selected from previous studies, for their ability to assimilate cholesterol. Initially, MRS bacterial culture media was supplemented with cholesterol and the bacterial strains were added for 24 h of incubation. All the bacterial strains were shown to successfully assimilate cholesterol but with high variability across the species and strains. There were six Lactobacillus strains that assimilated the most cholesterol in MRS broth: L. reuteri NCIMB 702656, L. fermentum NCIMB 8829, L. acidophilus ATCC 314, L. rhamnosus GG ATCC 53103, L. fermentum NCIMB 2797, and L. plantarum ATCC 14917. Cholesterol assimilation was as high as 59.94 ± 7.49 μg/mL, for L. reuteri NCIMB 702656. Studies by previous groups have demonstrated cholesterol assimilation in the same range, with Bordoni et al. demonstrating that Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantis ATCC assimilates 40 μg/mL and Bifidobacterium bifidum MB 109 assimilated 50 μg/mL of cholesterol in MRS broth [36]. Similarly, Yu et al. demonstrated that probiotic strains could assimilate cholesterol in the range of 14–22 μg/mL [37].

As the previous experiments used bacterial growth media, we further investigated probiotic cholesterol assimilation under simulated intestinal conditions, to more closely mimic in vivo conditions, a first in the literature. The results, as in MRS, demonstrated a high variability of cholesterol assimilation over the various bacterial strains and species. Under these conditions, the Lactobacillus strains that assimilated the most cholesterol were L. reuteri NCIMB 11951, L. reuteri NCIMB 701089, and L. acidophilus ATCC 314, with cholesterol assimilation as high as 41.20 ± 1.92 μg/mL, for L. acidophilus ATCC 314.

We also investigated how much cholesterol would be assimilated based on 10¹⁰ bacterial cells, representative of a typical probiotic dose. When cell counts of each strain were accounted for, under simulated intestinal conditions, L. reuteri NCIMB 701089 was the best () assimilator with 2254.70 ± 63.33 mg of cholesterol assimilated per 10¹⁰ cells. Hypercholesterolemia is defined as having a serum cholesterol level over 240 mg/dL [38]. With this number in mind, we hypothesize that the administration of the probiotic strains, especially L. reuteri NCIMB 701089, could lower cholesterol levels significantly, although animal studies are required to evaluate its efficacy. One concern is the fact that recent work, by Madani et al., questions the use of in vitro cholesterol reducing activity assays as predictors of in vivo cholesterol-lowering activity [39]. With this in mind, it is clear that there is a need for additional work into strains, such as L. reuteri NCIMB 701089, prior to its use as a cholesterol-lowering therapeutic. Future work may focus on investigations into other cholesterol-lowering properties, including screening for bile salt hydrolase activity. In terms of cholesterol assimilation, the specific mechanism by which the cholesterol is removed from the supernatant should be determined. Ideally, a probiotic that would influence multiple targets, using bile salt hydrolase activity, reducing HMG-CoA reductase activity, and assimilating cholesterol, would be developed. In addition, a probiotic formulation could be developed as a combination therapy with pharmaceutics such as statins.

5. Conclusion

These results provide an initial screening of probiotic strains for their efficacy as cholesterol-lowering therapeutics via cholesterol assimilation. The capability of probiotic Lactobacillus strains to remove cholesterol from media, especially under simulated intestinal conditions, demonstrates their potential use as cholesterol-lowering agents. Moreover, the data suggests that L. reuteri NCIMB 701089 should be further characterized for its capability to lower cholesterol, using both in vitro and in vivo investigations. This work is an initial step for the development of a successful cholesterol-lowering probiotic therapeutic.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no financial conflict of interests related to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Micropharma Ltd. grants and a Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) Grant (MOP 264308) to Dr. Satya Prakash. Catherine Tomaro-Duchesneau acknowledges the support of the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Doctoral Scholarship.

References

N. N. Anitschkow, “Uber die veranderung der Kaninchenaorta bei experimenteller cholesterinsteatose,” Beiträge zur pathologischen Anatomie und zur allgemeinen Pathologie, vol. 56, pp. 379–404, 1913.

G. L. Duff and G. C. McMillan, “Pathology of atherosclerosis,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 92–108, 1951.

J.-E. Tarride, M. Lim, M. DesMeules et al., “A review of the cost of cardiovascular disease,” Canadian Journal of Cardiology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. e195–e202, 2009.

World Health Organization, “The top 10 causes of death,” Fact Sheet 310, 2011.

S. M. Grundy, J. I. Cleeman, C. N. Bairey Merz et al., “Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines,” Circulation, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 227–239, 2004.

National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III), “Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III) final report,” Circulation, vol. 106, pp. 3143–3421, 2002.

T. A. Pearson, I. Laurora, H. Chu, and S. Kafonek, “The lipid treatment assessment project (L-TAP): a multicenter survey to evaluate the percentages of dyslipidemic patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy and achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 160, no. 4, pp. 459–467, 2000.

A. Brautbar and C. M. Ballantyne, “Pharmacological strategies for lowering LDL cholesterol: statins and beyond,” Nature Reviews Cardiology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 253–265, 2011.

K. A. Foley, R. J. Simpson Jr., J. R. Crouse III, T. W. Weiss, L. E. Markson, and C. M. Alexander, “Effectiveness of statin titration on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in patients at high risk of atherogenic events,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 79–81, 2003.

T. C. Andrews, C. M. Ballantyne, J. A. Hsia, and J. H. Kramer, “Achieving and maintaining National Cholesterol Education Program low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals with five statins,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 185–191, 2001.

S. Prakash, C. Tomaro-Duchesneau, S. Saha, and A. Cantor, “The gut microbiota and human health with an emphasis on the use of microencapsulated bacterial cells,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2011, Article ID 981214, 12 pages, 2011.

F. A. O. Joint, “WHO Expert consultation on evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria,” Córdoba, Argentina. October 2001

L. G. Ooi, R. Ahmad, K. H. Yuen, and M. T. Liong, “Lactobacillus acidophilus CHO-220 and inulin reduced plasma total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol via alteration of lipid transporters,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 93, pp. 5048–5058, 2010.

M. L. Jones, C. Tomaro-Duchesneau, C. J. Martoni, and S. Prakash, “Cholesterol lowering with bile salt hydrolase-active probiotic bacteria, mechanism of action, clinical evidence, and future direction for heart health applications,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 631–642, 2013.

H.-S. Lye, G. R. Rahmat-Ali, and M.-T. Liong, “Mechanisms of cholesterol removal by lactobacilli under conditions that mimic the human gastrointestinal tract,” International Dairy Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 169–175, 2010.

D. I. A. Pereira and G. R. Gibson, “Cholesterol assimilation by lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria isolated from the human gut,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 4689–4693, 2002.

C. Tomaro-Duchesneau, S. Saha, M. Malhotra, et al., “Lactobacillus fermentum NCIMB 5221 has a greater ferulic acid production compared to other ferulic acid esterase producing Lactobacilli,” International Journal of Probiotics and Prebiotics, vol. 7, pp. 23–32, 2012.

C. Tomaro-Duchesneau, S. Saha, M. Malhotra et al., “Probiotic ferulic acid esterase active Lactobacillus fermentum NCIMB 5221 APA microcapsules for oral delivery: preparation and in vitro characterization,” Pharmaceuticals, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 236–248, 2012.

H. K. Kim, T.-S. Jeong, M.-K. Lee, Y. B. Park, and M.-S. Choi, “Lipid-lowering efficacy of hesperetin metabolites in high-cholesterol fed rats,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 327, no. 1-2, pp. 129–137, 2003.

M. P. Taranto, M. Medici, G. Perdigon, A. P. Ruiz Holgado, and G. F. Valdez, “Evidence for hypocholesterolemic effect of Lactobacillus reuteri in hypercholesterolemic mice,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 2336–2340, 1998.

C. Tomaro-Duchesneau, S. Saha, M. Malhotra et al., “Effect of orally administered L. fermentum NCIMB 5221 on markers of metabolic syndrome: an in vivo analysis using ZDF rats,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 98, pp. 115–126, 2014.

M. Kumar, S. Rakesh, R. Nagpal et al., “Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Aloe vera gel improve lipid profiles in hypercholesterolemic rats,” Nutrition, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 574–579, 2013.

W. Lubbadeh, M. S. Y. Haddadin, M. A. Al-Tamimi, and R. K. Robinson, “Effect on the cholesterol content of fresh lamb of supplementing the feed of Awassi ewes and lambs with Lactobacillus acidophilus,” Meat Science, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 381–385, 1999.

J. W. Anderson and S. E. Gilliland, “Effect of fermented milk (yogurt) containing Lactobacillus acidophilus L1 on serum cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic humans,” Journal of the American College of Nutrition, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 1999.

K. K. Grunewald, “Serum cholesterol levels in rats fed skim milk fermented by Lactobacillus acidophilus,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 47, pp. 2078–2079, 1982.

C.-G. Ha, J.-K. Cho, C.-H. Lee, Y.-G. Chai, Y. A. Ha, and S.-H. Shin, “Cholesterol lowering effect of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from human feces,” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1201–1209, 2006.

J. Jeun, S. Kim, S.-Y. Cho et al., “Hypocholesterolemic effects of Lactobacillus plantarum KCTC3928 by increased bile acid excretion in C57BL/6 mice,” Nutrition, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 321–330, 2010.

M. Naruszewicz, M.-L. Johansson, D. Zapolska-Downar, and H. Bukowska, “Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v on cardiovascular disease risk factors in smokers,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 1249–1255, 2002.

M. C. Fuentes, T. Lajo, J. M. Carrión, and J. Cuñé, “Cholesterol-lowering efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 7527, 7528 and 7529 in hypercholesterolaemic adults,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 109, no. 10, pp. 1866–1872, 2013.

L. L. Rudel and M. D. Morris, “Determination of cholesterol using o phthalaldehyde,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 364–366, 1973.

U.S. Pharmacopeia, Test Solutions, 2010

K. Whelan and E. M. M. Quigley, “Probiotics in the management of irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease,” Current Opinion in Gastroenterology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 184–189, 2013.

S. Prakash, C. Tomaro-Duchesneau, S. Saha, L. Rodes, I. Kahouli, and M. Malhotra, “Probiotics for the prevention and treatment of allergies, with an emphasis on mode of delivery and mechanism of action,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1025–1037, 2013.

K. Tahri, J. P. Grill, and F. Schneider, “Bifidobacteria strain behavior toward cholesterol: coprecipitation with bile salts and assimilation,” Current Microbiology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 187–193, 1996.

M.-Y. Lin and T.-W. Chen, “Reduction of cholesterol by Lactobacillus acidophilus in culture broth,” Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 97–102, 2000.

A. Bordoni, A. Amaretti, A. Leonardi et al., “Cholesterol-lowering probiotics: in vitro selection and in vivo testing of bifidobacteria,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 97, no. 18, pp. 8273–8281, 2013.

Z. Yu, X. Zhang, S. Li, C. Li, D. Li, and Z. Yang, “Evaluation of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from Chinese sauerkraut,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 489–498, 2013.

Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults, “Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III),” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 285, no. 19, pp. 2486–2497, 2001.

G. Madani, M. Mirlohi, M. Yahay, and A. Hassanzadeh, “How much in vitro cholesterol reducing activity of Lactobacilli predicts their in vivo cholesterol function?” International Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 404–413, 2013.