BioMed Research International

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 870209, 6 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/870209

Clinical Study

Expression of IMPDH mRNA after Mycophenolate Administration in Male Volunteers

Sollip Kim,¹ Woochang Lee,² Sail Chun,² Tae Hyun Um,¹ and Won-Ki Min²

¹Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang 411-706, Republic of Korea

²Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro, 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Republic of Korea

Received 26 February 2014; Revised 3 June 2014; Accepted 4 June 2014; Published 1 July 2014

Academic Editor: Giulio Mengozzi

Copyright © 2014 Sollip Kim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Background. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is the first-line antimetabolic immunosuppressants used in solid organ transplantation. Here, in vivo expressions of the pharmacodynamic marker IMPDH mRNA were analyzed to investigate its usefulness in assessing drug effects. Materials and Methods. Six healthy male volunteers who had the same genotype for genes known to be associated with drug metabolism and effects were selected to remove the confounding effect of these genotypes. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 1 g) was administered once to each subject, and blood samples were collected with certain interval before and after MMF administration to measure lymphocyte expression levels of IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA. One week later, the experiment was repeated. Results. Whereas IMPDH1 mRNA expression was stable, IMPDH2 mRNA expression showed 2 peaks in the first week. Both IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA expression in the second week remarkably decreased from the first week. Conclusion. The temporary increase in IMPDH2 mRNA expression in the first week might be due to a reactive reaction against the plasma MPA concentration. In the second week, the intracellular guanosine monophosphate might be depleted, rendering IMPDH2 mRNA synthesis inactive. When MPA is regularly administered to reach a steady state, the IMPDH2 mRNA expression may be kept low and may effectively reflect biological responses regardless of drug intake.

1. Introduction

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is the first-line antimetabolic immunosuppressive agent [1] used in human solid organ transplantation. It is usually administered with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) such as tacrolimus and cyclosporine [2]. After administration, MMF is quickly hydrolyzed to mycophenolic acid (MPA), which is its active metabolite. When MPA is combined with inositol monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) in a cell, the catalytic action of IMPDH is inhibited and inosine monophosphate (IMP) cannot be converted to xanthosine monophosphate (XMP). Therefore, intracellular guanosine monophosphate (GMP) becomes depleted over time. Consequently, DNA synthesis, which requires guanosine triphosphate (GTP), does not occur and cell proliferation is inhibited [3]. In cells, GTP is synthesized not only through the de novo pathway by IMPDH but also through an alternative pathway. However, since T- and B-lymphocytes can use only the de novo pathway, MPA selectively inhibits lymphocyte proliferation [3, 4].

Since MPA has a narrow therapeutic range and many side effects, therapeutic drug monitoring is useful for several conditions such as dual immunosuppressive therapy, reduced-dosage CNI therapy, CNI switch or withdrawal, recipients with high immunologic risk, delayed graft function, and altered gastrointestinal/hepatic/renal function [5]. However, the trough level does not reflect its pharmacodynamic effects, so the practical dosing guidelines based on drug concentration remain to be established [1, 5]. The target area under the curve (AUC) of the MPA blood concentration between 30 and 60 mg h/L remains acceptable therapeutic window [5–7]. However, this method requires repeated blood collection, so its clinical application is limited [5]. Although the limited sampling strategy showed good association to full AUC, it also requires at least 3 h stay for 3-time sampling and preexisting population pharmacokinetic model [5].

Therefore, a pharmacodynamic marker that can accurately reflect the biological effects of drugs on target cells must be developed. The activity of IMPDH, which is the intracellular target of MPA, showed limited association with clinical outcomes [5, 8–13]. High-performance liquid chromatography is the most widely used method of measuring IMPDH activity, but it is complicated and requires much time and effort. Moreover, its results vary so much that its clinical application is not widely accepted. Generally, the real-time reverse transcription- (RT-) PCR method is sensitive and can be used in clinical laboratories quickly and conveniently. So, we applied the real-time RT PCR method for IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA expression measurement.

The association of IMPDH mRNA expression with the clinical outcomes of MMF-treated kidney transplant patients has been reported [14], but no study has reported the in vivo IMPDH mRNA expression immediately after MMF administration to volunteers with same condition. We selected healthy volunteers who have same genotypes, gender, and race to reduce the effect of between-subject variability. Reasons for between-subject variability include differences in albumin, bilirubin and hemoglobin concentrations, renal and hepatic function, coadministration of cyclosporine, comorbidities, body weight, concomitant medication, time after transplantation, gender, race, and genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes [5]. In this study, the in vivo IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA expressions were measured over 10 h after MMF administration to healthy people with same genotype using the real-time RT-PCR method to investigate the potential use of these two genes as pharmacodynamic markers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Healthy Volunteers

This study was approved by the local Institutional ethics committee. All subjects provided written informed consent. The study design is shown in Supplementary Figure (see Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/870209).

A total of 75 healthy male volunteers were selected for this study. The selection criteria were as follows: (1) 18- to 50-year-old healthy Korean male volunteers with (2) a body mass index of 18.5–29.9 kg/m² and (3) past histories and physical examination and laboratory test results that revealed no abnormal findings. Candidates were excluded from this study when they were (1) hypersensitive to MMF or related drugs, (2) female, (3) administered with other medications up to 14 days before the study or during the study, (4) under the influence of alcohol since 2 days before the study or during the study, (5) suffering from any disease, including mental illness, (6) infected with AIDS or syphilis, positive for anti-HCV, or hepatitis B carriers, and (7) on an unusual diet (such as a low-sodium diet) for whatever reason. For the laboratory tests, the subjects’ complete blood counts (hemoglobin, hematocrit, and red blood cell (RBC), white blood cell (WBC), differential, and platelet counts) and general blood chemistry (glucose, total protein, albumin, creatinine, AST, ALT, ALP, total cholesterol, total bilirubin, and direct bilirubin) were obtained.

The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) [15–25] of the genes (UGT1A8, UGT1A9, UGT2B7, IMPDH1, and IMPDH2) known to affect MPA metabolism and functions were investigated in the subjects. The volunteers who showed the same genotype were selected for removing the confounding effect by genotype. Six subjects were finally selected for the IMPDH mRNA expression study. The subjects swallowed (not chewed) 1 g of MMF tablet with water after fasting for 8 h, after which they resumed their regular diet. From 3 days before the study, the subjects’ alcohol intake, smoking, and intake of other medications, greasy foods, and excessive water were restricted. Blood samples were collected at regular intervals over 10 h before and after the MMF administration (at the baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10 h). The plasma total MPA concentrations and the IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA expression levels in the lymphocytes were measured. One week later, when the administered drug was supposed to have been removed from the blood, the whole study protocol including MMF administration and blood sampling was repeated (Supplementary Figure 1). The time interval between week 1 and week 2 for all six volunteers was the same.

2.2. Genotyping for SNPs Associated with MPA Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics

Based on a literature review on genotyping for SNPs associated with the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of MPA, 10 SNPs of the genes known to affect MPA metabolism and effects were selected [15–25]. The primers and probes that were used for the genotyping were designed in house using Primer3Plus, a web-based software (http://www.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/primer3plus/primer3plus.cgi/). Using the gene-specific primer and the allele-specific TaqMan probe, real-time PCR was conducted. In each well of the 96-well microplates, 0.5 μL of 2X TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (10 μL), 40X SNP genotyping assay, and 2 μL of template DNA were added and mixed after making the total volume up to 20 μL with distilled H₂O. The primers, probes, and master mix were purchased from Applied Biosystems (Poster, CA). The microplate was installed on a LightCycler 480 real-time PCR system (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) and allowed to react for 1 min at 95°C before 40 cycles of amplification were performed. Each cycle was comprised of 15 s denaturation at 95°C and 1 min extension at 50°C. The outcomes were read using the end-point genotyping method. Information on the primers and probes is shown in Supplementary Table 1.The dye for Reporter 1 was VIC, and the quencher was NFQ; for Reporter 2, the dye was FAM, and the quencher was NFQ.

2.3. Total MPA Blood Concentrations

Using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) anticoagulated plasma, the EMIT 2000 Mycophenolic Acid Assay reagent, and the VIVA-E Drug Testing System (Siemens Healthcare, Deerfield, IL), the total and free MPA blood concentrations were measured according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The analytical measurement range was 0.1–15 μg/mL. The repeatabilities at the low, intermediate, and high concentrations were 3.4%, 3.6%, and 4.9%, respectively, and the total precisions were 6.1%, 4.5%, and 6.5%, respectively.

2.4. IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA Expression Study

(1) Lymphocytes Separation. After the blood samples were collected, the monocytes were separated from the EDTA anticoagulated whole blood within 2 h. After 3 mL of Ficoll-Paque PLUS (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) was applied to the centrifuge tube, 6 mL of a solution that was a 1 : 1 mixture of phosphate buffer and whole blood was gently added to it to form a layer. Centrifugation was conducted at room temperature (18–20°C) at 400 g for 40 min. The upper layer was removed using a clean Pasteur pipette and the lymphocyte layer was carefully collected. To prevent contamination of the granulocytes and platelets, the sample was washed with 6 mL of phosphate buffer before it was centrifuged at room temperature at 100 g for 10 min. After the pellet was cleaned twice, it was put in a 1.5 mL guanidinium thiocyanate solution (RNA/DNA Stabilization Reagent for Blood/Bone Marrow; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) to be vortexed for 5 min, and then the test tube was slowly stirred for over 4 h.

(2) RNA Extraction and cDNA Translation. RNA was manually extracted from the lymphocyte suspension. The High Pure RNA Extraction Kit (Roche Diagnostics) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and purity of the extracted RNA were measured using a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE).

Within 1 h of the extraction, the RNA was translated into cDNA using AccuPower CycleScript RT PreMix dN6 (Bioneer, Daejeon, Republic of Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Amplification was then done using a PTC-200 thermal cycler (MJ Research, Waltham, MA).

(3) Development and Validation of Real-Time PCR for the IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA Expressions. As an internal positive control, the ACTB gene that encodes β-actin was selected. Five primer sets of IMPDH1, IMPDH2, and ACTB were designed based on NM_000883.3, NM_000884.2, and NM_001101.3, respectively, using Primer3Plus. To prevent contamination by genomic DNA, at least one of the forward and reverse primers was placed at the exon-exon junction. For efficient real-time PCR, the size of the final product was limited to 150 nucleotides or less. Using the prepared primer, real-time PCR was conducted to select the primer set that had the least cycle threshold (Ct) and which showed a single peak in the melting curve analysis. Information on the selected primer is shown in Supplementary Table 2. With the selected primer, real-time PCR was conducted using the AccuPower Greenstar qPCR PreMix & Exicycler 96 Real-Time Quantitative Thermal Block (Bioneer) device. After 10 min cultivation at 95°C, a denaturation cycle at 94°C for 20 s with an extension at 54°C for 30 s was repeated 45 times. The standard DNAs of the three genes were synthesized at the concentrations of 2 × 10⁰, 2 × 10¹, 2 × 10², 2 × 10³, 2 × 10⁴, 2 × 10⁵, 2 × 10⁶, and 1 × 10⁸ to evaluate the linearity of the test. The precision was calculated through four repeated measurements.

(4) IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA Expression Levels in the Volunteers. Using the extracted RNA from the lymphocytes of the six subjects, the mRNA expression levels of the IMPDH1, IMPDH2, and ACTB genes were measured. Each batch included the standard DNA, and the samples were quadruplicated. The expression level was calculated using the standard curve method for relative quantification. It was described as arbitrary unit, showing the ratio of IMPDH mRNA expression to ACTB (internal control gene) mRNA expression. For the calculations and statistical analysis, Microsoft Office Excel 2010 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and MedCalc statistical software version 9.2.0.2 (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium) were used.

3. Results

3.1. Genotyping for SNPs Associated with MPA Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics

Nine (12%) of 75 volunteers had the same genotypes. Because three subjects refused to continue to participate in this study, 6 volunteers joined the IMPDH mRNA expression study. The genotypes of 6 volunteers were UGT1A8 rs1042597 CG, UGT1A9 rs17868320 CC, rs6714486 TT, rs72551330 TT, UGT2B7 rs7439366 CC, IMPDH1 rs2278293 AG, rs2278294 AG, IMPDH2 rs121434586 CT, rs72639214 CC, and rs11706052 TT.

3.2. Total MPA Blood Concentrations

The plasma total MPA level peaked 1 h after MMF intake and abruptly decreased 2 h later. The plasma concentrations of MPA of some subjects showed a second peak at 3–10 h after MMF intake, which was attributed to the enterohepatic circulation. The same pattern was seen when the experiments were repeated one week later (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 1: Plasma total MPA concentrations ((a) and (b)), IMPDH1 mRNA expressions ((c) and (d)), and IMPDH2 mRNA expressions ((e) and (f)) in the first week and the second week, respectively, over 10 h after the administration of MMF to the six volunteers. Black arrow means the administration of MMF. The -axis in mRNA expression graph is arbitrary unit, showing the ratio of IMPDH mRNA expression to ACTB (reference gene) mRNA expression.

3.3. Validation of Real-Time PCR for the IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA Expressions

Linearity evaluation confirmed the linearity in all concentration ranges (–). All R ² values of the regression lines were 0.99 or higher, showing excellent linearity. From the precision measurement, the mean Ct standard deviations of ACTB, IMPDH1, and IMPDH2 were determined to be 0.44 (range, 0.01–5.59), 0.35 (0.01–1.59), and 0.11 (0.01–0.99), respectively.

3.4. IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA Expressions in the Volunteers

In the first week, the IMPDH1 mRNA expression level did not change significantly according to the time interval, whereas the IMPDH2 mRNA expression level peaked 1–3 h after drug intake. The level increased again 3–10 h after intake to show a double peak (Figures 1(c) and 1(e)). Expression levels of IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA in the second week were remarkably lower than in the first week (Figures 1(d) and 1(f)).

4. Discussion

In the present study, 1 g (the typical unit dosage) of MMF was administered to volunteers to observe IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA expression pattern and blood MPA concentrations. The observations were done at predefined intervals over 10 h before and after drug intake. The experiment including drug administration and samplings was repeated a week later to evaluate how fast mRNA expression decreases upon MMF intake. To exclude the influence of other factors on the mRNA expression, the study was limited to 18- to 50-year-old Korean healthy male volunteers. Ten genotypes that are known to affect the metabolism and biological effects of MMF were tested, and the subjects who had the same genotypes were selected for inclusion in the in vivo study. An association of IMPDH mRNA expression with clinical outcomes of MMF-treated kidney transplant patients has been reported [3, 14, 26, 27], but no study has been reported on the behavior of the in vivo IMPDH mRNA expression immediately after drug administration with the same condition.

The IMPDH1 mRNA expression levels in the first week were stable, while the IMPDH2 mRNA expression levels showed two peaks, at 1–3 h and 3–10 h after intake. The first IMPDH2 mRNA expression peak is thought to be a temporary reactive reaction to the plasma MPA concentrations, and the second peak is thought to have been a response to the increase in blood MPA concentration caused by the enterohepatic circulation. In contrast, in the second week, the IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA expression levels quite decreased compared with those of the first week (Figures 1(c)–1(f)). The possible reason is that IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA synthesis was deemed to be inactive due to the depleted intracellular GMP. Given that intracellular MPA firmly combines with IMPDH enzyme and XMP through a hydrogen bond and the van der Waals force [28], MPA is thought to consistently inhibit GMP proliferation, thereby depleting GMP. In an in vitro experiment, when MPA was added after culturing of mixed lymphocytes, lymphocyte proliferation was inhibited for at least 72 h [3, 26, 27]. These outcomes showed that the inhibitive effect of MPA may be maintained for a considerable length of time, as long as guanosine is not provided from outside sources. Based on this, when MPA is taken on a regular basis to reach a steady state, intracellular GMP might become depleted, and consequently, the IMPDH2 mRNA expression level may remain low. Therefore, one-point sampling test results may effectively reflect the biological responses regardless of the time of the drug intake, enabling its use as a marker. In contrast, the drug was removed from the blood within 8 h after intake in the first- and second-week experiments. Even though a steady state was attained after drug intake that lasted for longer than a month, the blood concentration level showed a pattern of an increase followed by a decrease with the passing of time. Accordingly, the AUC must be calculated for use as a surrogate marker. Some of the 6 volunteers showed the low first peak and second peak in week 1. Unfortunately, we do not know the exact reason of this result. However, if we have more sensitive technique, maybe we could see the peak in week 1.

In this study, the IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA expression levels were measured via the real-time PCR method and SYBR Green. SYBR Green is an asymmetric cyanine dye that combines with double-stranded DNA, as well as with single-stranded DNA and RNA, though to a lesser extent. Even though SYBR Green has a lower specificity than the TaqMan probe, which combines only with a single helix that has a relevant base sequence, it has a high sensitivity level that allows it to be widely used to measure expression levels. Here, a combination that showed single peak was selected through fusion curve analysis that was repeated in each test to confirm the single peak and, accordingly, to secure the specificity of the test. As the standard DNA was synthesized for application, the linearity was confirmed at 8 log and the precision was excellent, with the standard deviations of the IMPDH1, IMPDH2, and ACTB gene Ct values at 0.5 or lower. Because real-time PCR is a convenient and straight-forward method that can provide results within 2 h after DNA extraction, it can also be widely used in clinical laboratories.

Because RBCs comprise a large portion of the whole blood cells and express IMPDH, the IMPDH expression of RBCs is most probably obtained when the test is conducted with whole blood. In this study, the lymphocytes were separated manually using the Ficoll-Hypaque technique. However, in clinical application, a commercial RNA stabilizing lymphocyte isolation blood tube may be used to achieve more stable outcomes.

One limitation of the current study is that MMF was administered to healthy volunteers only once a week, and then the pattern of the IMPDH mRNA expression was observed. Because MMF is an immunosuppressive agent that can have severe side effects, it could not be administered multiple times in a row to healthy volunteers. Further studies on the expression pattern of IMPDH mRNA, examining patients after repeated administrations, may be needed in the future.

In conclusion, the in vivo IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA expression levels in healthy volunteers after MPA intake were observed weekly in this study to confirm the possible use of the IMPDH2 mRNA expression test as an effective pharmacodynamic marker of biological responses. Moreover, the real-time RT-PCR method that was developed and verified in this study showed a wide linearity range with excellent precision. The IMPDH1 and IMPDH2 mRNA expression tests can also be conveniently conducted in clinical laboratories.

Abbreviations

AUC: | Area under the curve
GMP: | Guanosine monophosphate
GTP: | Guanosine triphosphate
IMP: | Inosine monophosphate
IMPDH: | Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase
MMF: | Mycophenolate mofetil
MPA: | Mycophenolic acid
RBC: | Red blood cell
SNP: | Single nucleotide polymorphism
WBC: | White blood cell
XMP: | Xanthosine monophosphate.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

References

B. L. Kasiske, M. G. Zeier, J. R. Chapman et al., “KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients: a summary,” Kidney International, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 299–311, 2010.

KDIGO Transplant Work Group, “KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients,” The American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 9, supplement 3, pp. S1–S155, 2009.

A. C. Allison, W. J. Kowalski, C. D. Muller, and E. M. Eugui, “Mechanisms of action of mycophenolic acid,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 696, pp. 63–87, 1993.

A. C. Allison and E. M. Eugui, “Mycophenolate mofetil and its mechanisms of action,” Immunopharmacology, vol. 47, no. 2-3, pp. 85–118, 2000.

D. R. Kuypers, Y. Le Meur, M. Cantarovich et al., “Consensus report on therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid in solid organ transplantation,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 341–358, 2010.

M. D. Hale, A. J. Nicholls, R. E. S. Bullingham et al., “The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship for mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation,” Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 672–683, 1998.

T. van Gelder, L. B. Hilbrands, Y. Vanrenterghem et al., “A randomized double-blind, multicenter plasma concentration controlled study of the safety and efficacy of oral mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection after kidney transplantation,” Transplantation, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 261–266, 1999.

H. D. Jonge, M. Naesens, and D. R. J. Kuypers, “New insights into the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolic acid: possible consequences for therapeutic drug monitoring in solid organ transplantation,” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 416–435, 2009.

O. Millán, N. Urtasun, and M. Brunet, “Biomarkers of the immunomodulatory effect of immunosuppressive drugs in transplant recipients,” Transplantation Reviews, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 120–128, 2009.

L. J. Langman, H. Nakakura, J. A. Thliveris, D. F. LeGatt, and R. W. Yatscoff, “Pharmacodynamic monitoring of mycophenolic acid in rabbit heterotopic heart transplant model,” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 146–152, 1997.

M. C. Raggi, S. B. Siebert, W. Steimer, T. Schuster, M. J. Stangl, and D. K. Abendroth, “Customized mycophenolate dosing based on measuring inosine-monophosphate dehydrogenase activity significantly improves patients outcomes after renal transplantation,” Transplantation, vol. 90, no. 12, pp. 1536–1541, 2010.

P. Glander, P. Hambach, K. Braun et al., “Pre-transplant inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase activity is associated with clinical outcome after renal transplantation,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 2045–2051, 2004.

L. R. Chiarelli, M. Molinaro, C. Libetta et al., “Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase variability in renal transplant patients on long-term mycophenolate mofetil therapy,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 38–50, 2010.

F. Sombogaard, A. M. A. Peeters, C. C. Baan et al., “Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase messenger RNA expression is correlated to clinical outcomes in mycophenolate mofetil-treated kidney transplant patients, whereas inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase activity is not,” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 549–556, 2009.

H. de Jonge and D. R. J. Kuypers, “Pharmacogenetics in solid organ transplantation: current status and future directions,” Transplantation Reviews, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 6–20, 2008.

S. S. Thomas, S. S. Li, J. W. Lampe, J. D. Potter, and J. Bigler, “Genetic variability, haplotypes, and htSNPs for exons 1 at the human UGT1A locus,” Human Mutation, vol. 27, no. 7, article 717, 2006.

J. Wang, J. W. Yang, A. Zeevi et al., “IMPDH1 gene polymorphisms and association with acute rejection in renal transplant patients,” Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 711–717, 2008.

L. A. Johnson, W. S. Oetting, S. Basu, S. Prausa, A. Matas, and P. A. Jacobson, “Pharmacogenetic effect of the UGT polymorphisms on mycophenolate is modified by calcineurin inhibitors,” European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 1047–1056, 2008.

M. Miura, H. Kagaya, S. Satoh et al., “Influence of drug transporters and UGT polymorphisms on pharmacokinetics of phenolic glucuronide metabolite of mycophenolic acid in Japanese renal transplant recipients,” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 559–564, 2008.

J. Grinyó, Y. Vanrenterghem, B. Nashan et al., “Association of four DNA polymorphisms with acute rejection after kidney transplantation,” Transplant International, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 879–891, 2008.

F. Sombogaard, R. H. van Schaik, R. A. Mathot et al., “Interpatient variability in IMPDH activity in MMF-treated renal transplant patients is correlated with IMPDH type II 3757T > C polymorphism,” Pharmacogenetics and Genomics, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 626–634, 2009.

H. Kagaya, M. Miura, M. Saito, T. Habuchi, and S. Satoh, “Correlation of IMPDH1 gene polymorphisms with subclinical acute rejection and mycophenolic acid exposure parameters on day 28 after renal transplantation,” Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 631–636, 2010.

A. Garat, C. L. L. Cardenas, A. Lionet et al., “Inter-ethnic variability of three functional polymorphisms affecting the IMPDH2 gene,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 5185–5188, 2011.

O. Gensburger, R. H. N. van Schaik, N. Picard et al., “Polymorphisms in type I and II inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase genes and association with clinical outcome in patients on mycophenolate mofetil,” Pharmacogenetics and Genomics, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 537–543, 2010.

S. E. Tett, F. Saint-Marcoux, C. E. Staatz et al., “Mycophenolate, clinical pharmacokinetics, formulations, and methods for assessing drug exposure,” Transplantation Reviews, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 47–57, 2011.

M. Huang, Y. Ji, K. Itahana, Y. Zhang, and B. Mitchell, “Guanine nucleotide depletion inhibits pre-ribosomal RNA synthesis and causes nucleolar disruption,” Leukemia Research, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 131–141, 2008.

H. Daxecker, M. Raab, M. Cichna, P. Markl, and M. M. Müller, “Determination of the effects of mycophenolic acid on the nucleotide pool of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro by high-performance liquid chromatography,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 310, no. 1, pp. 81–87, 2001.

M. D. Sintchak and E. Nimmesgern, “The structure of inosine 5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase and the design of novel inhibitors,” Immunopharmacology, vol. 47, no. 2-3, pp. 163–184, 2000.