BioMed Research International

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 982504, 8 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/982504

Research Article

Bone Marrow Plasma Cell Assessment before Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Sung-Eun Lee,¹ Jae-Ho Yoon,¹ Seung-Hwan Shin,¹ Ki-Seong Eom,¹ Yoo-Jin Kim,¹ Hee-Je Kim,¹ Seok Lee,¹ Seok-Goo Cho,¹ Jong Wook Lee,¹ Woo-Sung Min,¹ Chong-Won Park,¹ Myungshin Kim,² and Chang-Ki Min¹

¹Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, #222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea

²Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea

Received 20 February 2014; Accepted 18 April 2014; Published 6 May 2014

Academic Editor: Dong Soon Lee

Copyright © 2014 Sung-Eun Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The current definition of complete response (CR) in multiple myeloma (MM) includes negative serum and urine immunofixation (IFE) tests and <5% bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs). However, many studies of the prognostic impact of pretransplant response have not included BMPCs. We evaluated the prognostic impact of BMPC assessment before peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization on subsequent transplant outcomes. BMPCs were assessed by CD138, kappa, and lambda immunostaining in 106 patients. After a median followup of 24.5 months, patients with <5% BMPCs had a significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those with ≥5% BMPCs . Patients with <5% BMPCs + serologic CR showed superior PFS compared to those with <5% BMPCs + serologic non-CR or ≥5% BMPCs + serologic non-CR . Interestingly, the prognostic impact of BMPCs was more apparent for patients who did not achieve a serologic CR compared to those with a serologic CR . We concluded that IFE negativity and <5% BMPCs before PBSC mobilization were important factors to predict PFS in patients with MM undergoing ASCT. Particularly, a significant impact of <5% BMPCs was observed in patients who did not achieve IFE negativity.

1. Introduction

The current definition of complete remission (CR) in multiple myeloma (MM) includes negative serum and urine immunofixation (IFE) tests and <5% bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) [1]. Additionally, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) has proposed a stringent CR category, requiring a normal serum free light chain (FLC) ratio and the absence of clonal cells in bone marrow [2]. However, there have been several studies aimed at evaluating the role of CR in MM without including BMPCs in the definition of CR [3–5]. Moreover, uncertainty has been introduced by the arbitrary 5% limit in BMPCs in patients with negative IFE.

With the introduction of novel agents for the treatment of MM, the CR rate has increased dramatically and the prognostic impact of CR achievement before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) needs to be evaluated. Kim et al. analyzed 197 MM patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by a single ASCT and found that CR status before ASCT is an important prognostic factor for better survival outcome. In their study, approach of the CR status did not require a bone marrow examination [5]. However, whether a more precise assessment of CR including bone marrow examination in addition to serologic testing is necessary has not yet been evaluated.

The goal of this study was to determine the prognostic impact of BMPCs as well as serum and urine IFE before peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization on the outcomes following ASCT. For this approach, known prognostic factors for survival in MM were also analyzed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Selection

This study included 106 newly diagnosed MM patients with available bone marrow aspirates and adequate cellularity who underwent ASCT at our institution between June 2009 and September 2012. To assess the prognostic impact of BMPCs as well as serologic response before PBSC mobilization on outcomes following ASCT, patients with MM who had measurable monoclonal (M) protein levels at diagnosis were included in this study and were divided according to achievement of <5% BMPCs and/or negative protein electrophoresis (PEP)/immunofixation (IFE) results in serum and urine. The Institutional Review Board of the Catholic University of Korea approved the research protocol for data analysis and this study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Pretransplant Bone Marrow Examination

BM aspiration and biopsy were performed before PBSC mobilization (Figure 1). Plasma cell counts were assessed after CD138 immunostaining by two examiners blinded to clinical outcomes. Lambda and kappa immunostaining were also performed to confirm monoclonal plasma cell (Figure 2). In all cases of disagreement between examiners, a common reading was organized to achieve a consensus on the count. Differential counts were recorded after a 500-cell count, and marrow cellularity was determined by both BM aspiration and biopsy section.

Figure 1: Study scheme.

Figure 2: Representative CD138 immunostaining. Plasma cells which express CD138 reveal lambda light chain restriction. CD138, lambda, and kappa chain immunostaining were performed to confirm monoclonal plasma cell on the BM biopsy samples.

2.3. Treatment Regimens and Transplant Procedures

Induction chemotherapy was consisted of bortezomib ± dexamethasone (), bortezomib + thalidomide + dexamethasone (), thalidomide + dexamethasone (), or high-dose dexamethasone-based regimen (). Transplant timing was dependent on achieving more than a partial response (PR), but some patients without progressive MM resistant to different novel agents (bortezomib and thalidomide) underwent ASCT. General ASCT procedures were performed as described in previous reports [6]. Briefly, all patients were mobilized with cyclophosphamide (3 g/m² total) over 2 days followed by G-CSF (lenograstim, JW pharmaceutical, Seoul, Korea) at 10 μg/kg/day, subcutaneously once a day. Conditioning consisted of melphalan (100 mg/m²) for 2 days. G-CSF (5 μg/kg/day) was administered subcutaneously to all patients from one day after transplantation until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was >3.0 × 10⁹/L. All patients received prophylactic antibiotics and an antifungal agent (fluconazole) starting 4 days before transplantation until the ANC reached 1.5 × 10⁹/L.

2.4. Definitions and Evaluation of Response

Stage was classified by the Durie-Salmon staging system and treatment response was assessed according to the criteria from the International Myeloma Working Group [2]. Serologic CR was defined as a lack of detectable M protein in serum and urine by PEP and IFE. Patients with a deletion of chromosome 13 or hypodiploidy determined by conventional cytogenetic study or t(4;14), t(14;16), and del(17p) established by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) of BM samples at diagnosis were stratified as high risk [2]. Overall survival (OS) from transplantation was defined as the time from ASCT to death from any cause, and surviving patients were censored at the last followup. Progression-free survival (PFS) was measured as the time from ASCT to disease progression or death (regardless of cause), whichever came first.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Our main objectives were to evaluate the prognostic impact of BMPCs before PBSC mobilization on the probability of PFS and OS. The probabilities of PFS and OS after ASCT were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Potential prognostic factors for PFS and OS were assessed using a two-tailed log-rank test including age, sex, stage at diagnosis, cytogenetic risk group, serum M protein type, induction therapy, maintenance therapy after ASCT, duration from diagnosis to ASCT, myeloma bone disease apparent on plain radiographs at diagnosis, hemoglobin level, serum LDH, creatinine, calcium, β2-microglobulin at diagnosis, and percentage of BMPCs at diagnosis. Covariates having a value of less than 0.1 in the univariate analyses were added to Cox proportional hazards regression models, in which all values were two-sided and statistical significance was set at . Associations between categorical variables were assessed using either χ ² or Fisher’s exact test. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare continuous variables.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

A total of 106 MM patients were included in this study, of whom 59 (56%) were male and 47 (44%) were female. The median age was 56 years (range 33–65 years) and the median disease duration before ASCT was 6.7 months (range 2.9–15.6 months). Stage IIA, IIIA, and IIIB diseases at diagnosis comprised 6%, 77%, and 17% of subjects, respectively, and all patients had measurable disease at diagnosis. Among 106 patients, 39 patients (37%) had a negative IFE test in serum and urine before PBSC mobilization, while 38 (36%) and 25 (23%) of patients achieved a very good partial response (VGPR) and PR, respectively. Four patients with MM resistant to different novel agents were in the stable disease (SD). Table 1 lists the demographic information for all patients and subgroups according to BMPCs before PBSC mobilization. BM examination performed a median of 2.0 months before ASCT (range 0.4–3.7 months). Seventy-three patients (69%) had BMPCs < 5% and 33 patients (31%) showed BMPCs ≥ 5%. The characteristics between the two groups differed in administered type of induction therapy and serologic response before PBSC mobilization (Table 1).

Table 1: Characteristics of patients and treatment.

All patients (N = 106) (%)
BMPCs before PBSC mobilization
P value

<5% (N = 73)
≥5% (N = 33)

Baseline characteristics

    Age, years, median (range)
56 (33–65)
56 (34–65)
56 (33–65)
ns

    Patient gender (M/F)
59 (56)/47 (44)
39 (53)/34 (47)
20 (61)/13 (39)
ns

    Serum M protein

ns

        Light chain
30 (28)
20 (28)
10 (30)

        Other than light chain
76 (72)
53 (72)
23 (70)

    Stage at diagnosis

ns

        IIA
6 (6)
6 (8)
0 (0)

        IIIA/B
100 (94)
67 (92)
33 (100)

    Cytogenetics*

ns

        Standard risk
88 (83)
63 (86)
25 (76)

        High risk
18 (17)
10 (14)
8 (24)

    BMPCs at diagnosis, %, median (range)
39 (3–90)
38 (3–88)
42.3 (8–90)
ns

    Myeloma bone disease on plain radiographs, yes/no
81 (76)/25 (24)
58 (80)/15 (20)
23 (70)/10 (30)
ns

    Serum calcium at diagnosis, mg/dL, median (range)
8.9 (6.8–16.2)
8.9 (6.8–15.7)
9.0 (7.4–16.2)
ns

    Serum creatinine at diagnosis, mg/dL, median (range)
0.9 (0.4–8.3)
0.9 (0.4–8.3)
0.9 (0.5–5.6)
ns

    β2-microglobulin at diagnosis, mg/mL, median (range)
3.5 (0.2–41.4)
3.5 (0.2–41.4)
3.8 (1.6–36.0)
ns

    Hemoglobin at diagnosis, g/dL, median (range)
9.8 (6.0–17.2)
9.8 (6.0–17.2)
9.5 (6.5–14.8)
ns

    Serum lactate dehydrogenase at diagnosis, U/L, median (range)
374 (81–1054)
389 (165–1054)
361 (81–889)
ns

Treatment and outcomes

    Induction therapy

0.039

        Bortezomib ± dexamethasone
51 (48)
36 (49)
15 (46)

        Bortezomib + thalidomide + dexamethasone
12 (11.5)
8 (11)
4 (12)

        Thalidomide + dexamethasone
31 (29)
17 (23)
14 (42)

        High-dose dexa-based regimen
12 (11.5)
12 (17)
0 (0)

    Duration from diagnosis to ASCT, months, median (range)
6.7 (2.9–15.6)
6.9 (2.9–15.6)
6.1 (3.9–15.3)
ns

    Maintenance therapy after ASCT

0.742

        Yes
73 (69)
51 (70)
22 (67)

        Thalidomide
50 (47)
35 (48)
15 (46)

        Bortezomib or Lenalidomide
8 (8)
3 (4)
5 (15)

        Prednisolone
15 (14)
13 (18)
2 (6)

        No
33 (31)
22 (30)
11 (33)

    Serologic response before PBSC mobilization

<0.001

        CR
39 (37)
35 (48)
4 (12)

        VGPR
38 (36)
25 (34)
13 (39.5)

        PR
25 (23)
12 (17)
13 (39.5)

        SD
4 (4)
1 (1)
3 (9)

    Serologic response after PBSC mobilization

<0.001

        CR
47 (44)
41 (56)
6 (18)

        VGPR
36 (34)
22 (30)
14 (42)

        PR
20 (19)
10 (14)
10 (30)

        SD
3 (3)
0 (0)
3 (9)

ASCT: autologous stem cell transplantation; BMPCs: bone marrow plasma cells; CR: complete response; ns: not significant; PBSC: peripheral blood stem cell; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; VGPR: very good partial response.

*High risk cytogenetics is defined as hypodiploidy or deletion 13 on conventional cytogenetics or presence of , , and del(17p) on fluorescent in  situ hybridization and/or conventional cytogenetics. All other cytogenetic abnormalities were considered standard risk.

3.2. Relation between Serologic CR and BMPCs before ASCT

Figure 3 shows the relation between serologic CR and BMPCs before PBSC mobilization. The median percentage of BMPCs was 1% (range 0–34%) and 4% (range 0–92%) for patients in serologic CR and non-CR, respectively (). Among 39 patients with serologic CR, 35 (90%) had <5% BMPCs, whereas four (10%) had ≥5% BMPCs. The serologic non-CR consisted of <5% BMPCs (, 57%) and ≥5% BMPCs (, 43%; ). In addition, among 62 patients who had normal serum FLC ratio, 14 (23%) and 48 (77%) patients had ≥5% BMPCs and <5% BMPCs, respectively. For the 44 patients with abnormal serum FLC ratio, 19 (43%) and 25 (57%) patients had ≥5% BMPCs and <5% BMPCs, respectively.

Figure 3: Relation between serologic CR and BMPCs before PBSC mobilization.

3.3. Transplant Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

The median followup for survivors was 24.5 months (range 4.7–45.9 months). All patients achieved engraftment and no patients died of complications before engraftment. The 2-year PFS of patients with <5% BMPCs and ≥5% BMPCs was 55.8% and 26.9% (median PFS 27.4 versus 12.0 months; ), respectively (Figure 4). The 2-year OS of patients with ≥5% BMPCs and <5% BMPCs were 89.2% and 84.0% (median OS was not reached; ), respectively.

Figure 4: Progression-free survival according to premobilization bone marrow plasma cells.

To assess prognostic factors affecting PFS and OS, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. High risk cytogenetics (), non-CR serologic response before PBSC mobilization (), and ≥5% BMPCs before PBSC mobilization () were potential risk factors for a lower PFS (Table 2). Considering the relationships between serologic response and BMPC percentage, patients were reclassified as four groups (<5% BMPCs + serologic CR versus <5% BMPCs + serologic non-CR versus ≥5% BMPCs + serologic CR versus ≥5% BMPCs + serologic non-CR) and entered into the multivariate models. Among the factors that affected PFS determined by univariate analyses, multivariate analyses revealed that high risk cytogenetics (RR of 2.05, ) was a predictive factor for a lower PFS. Based on the association of BMPCs with serologic response, <5% BMPCs + serologic non-CR (RR of 2.02, ) and ≥5% BMPCs + serologic non-CR (RR of 3.60, ) were significantly associated with inferior PFS, compared to <5% BMPCs + serologic CR (Table 3). In addition of the factors affecting OS in the univariate analyses, high risk cytogenetics (RR of 3.92, ) was an independent factor for OS.

Table 2: Univariate analysis of potential factors affecting survival outcomes.

Potential factor
Progression-free survival
Overall survival

RR (95% CI)
P value
RR (95% CI)
P value

Age at diagnosis (<60 years versus ≥60 years)
0.86 (0.46–1.58)
0.624
0.55 (0.12–2.51)
0.439

Sex (F versus M)
1.09 (0.63–1.90)
0.750
4.41 (0.96–10.13)
0.056

Immunoglobulin type (others versus Light chain only)
1.01 (0.56–1.82)
0.965
1.15 (0.35–3.83)
0.816

Durie-Salmon stage at diagnosis (II versus III)
1.08 (0.57–2.06)
0.821
1.19 (0.32–4.43)
0.791

Cytogenetics (standard versus High risk)
2.22 (1.20–4.10)
0.011
5.35 (1.71–16.71)
0.004

BMPCs at diagnosis (%) (continuous)
1.00 (0.99–1.01)
0.549
0.99 (0.96–1.01)
0.254

Serum calcium at diagnosis (<10 mg/dL versus ≥10 mg/dL)
1.59 (0.85–2.97)
0.151
3.42 (1.09–10.78)
0.036

Serum creatinine at diagnosis (<2 mg/dL versus ≥2 mg/dL)
0.81 (0.38–1.72)
0.583
1.73 (0.47–6.40)
0.413

β2-microglobulin at diagnosis (<5.5 mg/dL versus ≥5.5 mg/dL)
1.56 (0.89–2.71)
0.119
1.36 (0.43–4.30)
0.601

Hemoglobin at diagnosis (≥10 g/dL versus <10 g/dL)
1.20 (0.69–2.08)
0.524
1.17 (0.37–3.70)
0.786

Serum lactate dehydrogenase at diagnosis (<450 U/L versus ≥450 U/L)
1.47 (0.85–2.56)
0.169
1.58 (0.50–5.00)
0.433

Induction therapy (novel agents* versus nonnovel)
0.97 (0.45–2.06)
0.927
0.50 (0.06–3.86)
0.504

Duration from diagnosis to ASCT (<6 mo versus ≥6 mo)
0.79 (0.45–1.39)
0.412
0.65 (0.21–2.05)
0.460

Maintenance therapy after ASCT (no versus yes)
1.02 (0.54–1.93)
0.945
0.79 (0.21–2.97)
0.723

Serologic response before PBSC mobilization (CR versus non-CR)
2.41 (1.30–4.45)
0.005
2.27 (0.61–8.44)
0.222

Serologic response after PBSC mobilization (CR versus non-CR)†
2.77 (1.53–5.04)
0.001
1.96 (0.59–6.55)
0.274

BMPCs before PBSC mobilization (<5% versus ≥5%)
2.23 (1.26–3.95)
0.006
1.35 (0.40–4.53)
0.623

Response before PBSC mobilization‡  (<5% + CR versus <5% + non-CR versus ≥5% + CR versus ≥5% + non-CR)
1.98 (0.97–4.02)

1.44 (0.32–6.41)

3.83 (1.81–8.11)
0.005
3.45 (0.69–17.18)

4.94 (0.44–54.99)

2.58 (0.43–15.61)
0.443

ASCT: autologous stem cell transplantation; BMPCs: bone marrow plasma cells; CI: confidential interval; CR: complete response; non-CR: noncomplete response; RR: relative risk.

*Novel agents for induction therapies included proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drug.

†Serologic responses before and after PBSC mobilization were correlated. Therefore, serologic response after PBSC mobilization was not entered into the multivariate model.

‡BMPCs + serologic CR.

Table 3: Multivariate analysis of independent factors affecting survival outcomes.

Variable
E/N *
RR (95% CI)
P value

Progression-free survival

    Cytogenetics

        Standard
39/88
1

        High risk
14/18
2.05 (1.10–3.84)
0.024

    Response before PBSC mobilization†

        <5% + CR
13/35
1

        <5% + non-CR
20/38
2.02 (1.00–4.11)
0.050

        ≥5% + CR
2/4
1.52 (0.34–6.78)
0.583

        ≥5% + non-CR
18/29
3.60 (1.69–7.63)
0.001

Overall survival

    Sex

        Male
10/59
1

        Female
2/47
0.29 (0.06–1.33)
0.109

    Cytogenetics

        Standard
6/88
1

        High risk
6/18
3.92 (1.20–12.81)
0.024

    Ca at diagnosis

        <10 mg/dL
7/87
1

        ≥10 mg/dL
5/19
2.14 (0.65–7.06)
0.214

CR: complete response; non-CR: noncomplete response; RR: relative risk.

* E/N: number of events/number of evaluable patients.

†BMPCs + serologic CR.

3.4. Separate Analysis according to Serologic Subgroups

To minutely evaluate the importance of premobilization BMPCs in assessing the prognosis after ASCT, we performed a separate analysis in two subgroups according to serologic response before PBSC mobilization (serologic CR group versus serologic non-CR group). In the serologic CR subgroup, the 2-year PFS rates were 75.4% and 37.5% (median PFS 36.8 versus 17.7 months; ) for patients with <5% BMPCs and ≥5% BMPCs, respectively (Figure 5(a)). On the other hand, in the serologic non-CR subgroup, the 2-year PFS rates were 32.2% and 25.3% (median PFS 21.0 versus 12.5 months; ) for patients with <5% BMPCs and ≥5% BMPCs, respectively (Figure 5(b)).

(a)

(b)

Figure 5: Progression-free survival according to premobilization bone marrow plasma cells in serologic subgroups. (a) Progression-free survival in the serologic CR group and (b) Progression-free survival in the serologic non-CR group.

4. Discussion

Over the past 10–15 years, novel agents including immunomodulating drugs and proteasome inhibitors have been increasingly incorporated during ASCT for MM. The existing criteria for the assessment of disease response have not proven entirely satisfactory for the analysis of disease outcome before and after ASCT. CR has hitherto been defined as absence of detectable paraprotein in serum and urine according to IFE, maintained for a minimum of 6 weeks, together with <5% BMPCs on the basis of a normal number of plasma cells in the bone marrow (i.e., <4–5%) [1, 7]. However, the arbitrary 5% limit in BMPCs in patients with negative IFE results can lead to uncertainty. Moreover, the impact of BMPCs on patients with positive IFE results has remained unclear in the context of ASCT for MM. This study demonstrated that in addition to PEP and IFE in serum and urine, a pretransplant conventional BM study with CD138 immunostaining constitutes a predictor for disease progression in patients with MM undergoing ASCT. The prognostic impact of BMPCs was more apparent for patients who did not achieve a serologic CR compared to those with a serologic CR.

In this study, a serologic CR was defined as negative IFE for both serum and urine after induction therapy without considering BMPCs. Patients who had no detectable paraprotein on PEP without a negative IFE result (IFE either positive or not performed) were no longer classified as CR. Although it would be very unusual to achieve a serologic CR in secretory myeloma patients with persisting marrow plasma cell infiltration, we were able to detect this possibility by a BM examination in a small number of patients (, 3.8%). CD138 immunostaining was used to objectively evaluate BMPCs because normal plasma cell morphology is not specified and morphological assessment was thought to be too subjective. Additionally, lambda and kappa chain stains were performed to confirm monoclonal plasma cell. CD138/syndecan-1 is a cell membrane proteoglycan that functions as a matrix receptor and is expressed on the surface of mature epithelial cells [8] as well as normal and neoplastic plasma cells [9]. Within the spectrum of hematologic disorders, CD138 expression is highly sensitive and specific for plasmacytic differentiation and represents an excellent marker for routine evaluation of tissue samples for plasma cell disorders. CD138 is particularly helpful for plasma cell quantification in bone marrow biopsy specimens [10]. CD138 expression, however, has been regarded as heterogeneous and nonspecific for tumor type. Therefore, caution is required in the interpretation of CD138⁺ neoplasms for which a hematolymphoid derivation has not been established, particularly because some nonhematopoietic neoplasms might exhibit plasmacytoid features.

The use of autologous PBSCs for transplantation is associated with the risk of contamination of the graft with tumor cells; whether this impacts response rates, PFS, and OS is still debatable [11]. In this study, we could not determine whether high contamination of grafts with malignant cells [12] or in vivo tumor mass prior to ASCT [13] contributed to an unfavorable disease course after transplantation. In particular, the association of the percentage of pretransplant BMPCs with posttransplant PFS in patients having M protein after induction therapy has been unclear. Here, the percentage of BMPCs determined before PBSC mobilization for ASCT by means of CD138 immunostaining was associated with PFS, especially in patients who did not achieve serologic CR (Figure 5(b)). In our study, 38 of 106 patients (35.9%) had a serologic non-CR with a fraction of plasma cells <5% in BM and their survival was better than 29 patients (27.4%) with a serologic non-CR + ≥5% BMPCs. This result reflects the fact that the counting method of BMPCs using immunochemical staining of CD138, kappa, and lambda chain might detect the monoclonal plasma cells producing M protein more sensitively than usual stain such as Wright-Giemsa stain. The possible explanation was that measurement of the M-component reflects the secreted product. Our data suggested that BMPCs should be measured in patients who did not achieve a negative IFE result before PBSC collection. Additional treatment would then be required for those patients with high BMPCs. In vivo tumor cell purging prior to mobilization chemotherapy might be one strategy to improve the time to progression of high risk patients. Several studies have been performed to detect minimal residual disease to identify and predict patients at risk for future relapse [14, 15].

A meta-analysis found a strong association between maximal response to induction therapy and long-term survival [16]. To our knowledge, sensitivity to induction therapy measured by BMPCs at the time of ASCT has not been appropriately evaluated. Serial BM examinations are helpful, although the patchy nature of marrow involvement in myeloma makes it difficult to accurately interpret small changes in the percentage of plasma cells present. In this study, the prognostic impact of BMPC determination after induction therapy was more apparent for patients who did not achieve serologic CR compared to those with serologic CR, suggesting that the evaluation of BMPCs after induction therapy is required for all patients to predict disease progression after ASCT as well as to confirm the achievement of CR.

5. Conclusions

IFE negativity and <5% BMPCs prior to PBSC mobilization are important factors to predict PFS in patients with MM undergoing ASCT. A premobilization conventional BM study with CD138 immunostaining may constitute a useful predictor for disease progression in patients who did not achieve IFE negativity.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge all members at the Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center, particularly the house staff, for their excellent care of the patients. This study was supported by the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant no. A120175).

References

J. Blade, D. Samson, D. Reece et al., “Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Myeloma Subcommittee of the EBMT. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 1115–1123, 1998.

R. A. Kyle and S. V. Rajkumar, “Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma,” Leukemia, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 3–9, 2009.

S. V. Rajkumar, R. Fonseca, A. Dispenzieri et al., “Effect of complete response on outcome following autologous stem cell transplantation for myeloma,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 979–983, 2000.

S. V. Rajkumar, R. Fonseca, M. Q. Lacy et al., “Beta2-microglobulin and bone marrow plasma cell involvement predict complete responders among patients undergoing blood cell transplantation for myeloma,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 1261–1266, 1999.

J. S. Kim, K. Kim, J. Cheong et al., “Complete remission status before autologous stem cell transplantation is an important prognostic factor in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing upfront single autologous transplantation,” Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 463–470, 2009.

S. Lee, S. Yahng, B. Cho et al., “Lymphocyte subset analysis for the assessment of treatment-related complications after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma,” Cytotherapy, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 505–512, 2012.

B. G. M. Durie, J.-L. Harousseau, J. S. Miguel et al., “International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma,” Leukemia, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1467–1473, 2006.

K. Elenius and L. Jalkanen, “Function of the syndecans—a family of cell surface proteoglycans,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 107, no. 11, pp. 2975–2982, 1994.

R. C. Ridley, H. Xiao, H. Hata, J. Woodliff, J. Epstein, and R. D. Sanderson, “Expression of syndecan regulates human myeloma plasma cell adhesion to type I collagen,” Blood, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 767–774, 1993.

F. P. O'Connell, J. L. Pinkus, and G. S. Pinkus, “CD138 (syndecan-1), a plasma cell marker immunohistochemical profile in hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic neoplasms,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 254–263, 2004.

J. F. DiPersio, A. D. Ho, J. Hanrahan, F. J. Hsu, and S. Fruehauf, “Relevance and clinical implications of tumor cell mobilization in the autologous transplant setting,” Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 943–955, 2011.

H. G. Kopp, S. Yildirim, K. C. Weisel, L. Kanz, and W. Vogel, “Contamination of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell grafts predicts overall survival after high-dose chemotherapy in multiple myeloma,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 637–642, 2009.

A. K. Stewart, R. Vescio, G. Schiller et al., “Purging of autologous peripheral-blood stem cells using CD34 selection does not improve overall or progression-free survival after high-dose chemotherapy for multiple myeloma: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 19, no. 17, pp. 3771–3779, 2001.

M. Putkonen, V. Kairisto, V. Juvonen et al., “Depth of response assessed by quantitative ASO-PCR predicts the outcome after stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma,” European Journal of Haematology, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 416–423, 2010.

B. Paiva, M. Vidriales, J. Cerveró et al., “Multiparameter flow cytometric remission is the most relevant prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation,” Blood, vol. 112, no. 10, pp. 4017–4023, 2008.

H. J. K. van de Velde, X. Liu, G. Chen, A. Cakana, W. Deraedt, and M. Bayssas, “Complete response correlates with long-term survival and progression-free survival in high-dose therapy in multiple myeloma,” Haematologica, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 1399–1406, 2007.