BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 457326, 2 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/457326

Editorial

Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting

Bernardo Leon Rapoport,¹ Alexander Molasiotis,² Haralambos Raftopoulos,³ and Fausto Roila⁴

¹The Medical Oncology Center of Rosebank, Saxonwold, Johannesburg 2196, South Africa
²School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
³Merck & Co., Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
⁴Medical Oncology, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy

Received 15 June 2015; Accepted 15 June 2015

Copyright © 2015 Bernardo Leon Rapoport et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

In the past two decades, significant advances have been made in the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). These advances are primarily due to a greater understanding of the physiological and molecular pathways underlying CINV, which resulted in major progress in the management of patients with CINV.

In the early 1990s, CINV treatment consisted of dexamethasone [1]. Improvements in the management of CINV control were achieved with the discovery of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT₃) receptor and the development of 5HT₃ receptor antagonists (RA). This pathway is primarily involved in the acute phase of CINV. Subsequent studies demonstrated that the usage of the combination of 5HT₃ RA and dexamethasone resulted in additional improvements in CINV control [2, 3].

Over the last decade, the discovery of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK₁-RA) and its role in the pathogenesis of delayed phase of CINV has led to significant developments in the management of this complication of anticancer treatment. More importantly, these milestone achievements are significant and resulted in an improvement in anticancer treatment compliance, as well as an improvement in the quality of life of patients diagnosed with cancer.

Despite these achievements, nausea, in particular, and vomiting remain a clinically significant problem for patients receiving both highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). Seventy percent of patients treated with cisplatin-based HEC will achieve an overall antiemetic complete response when managed with a triple therapy consisting of a NK₁ RA aprepitant in combination with a 5HT₃ RA and corticosteroids prophylaxis [4, 5]. The current antiemetic guidelines (MASCC/ESMO, ASCO, and NCCN) endorse triple therapy treatment for patients receiving cisplatin- and AC-based chemotherapy regimes [6–8].

The current special issue includes several reviews including the biology and pharmacology of the NK₁ receptor and substance P, the antiemetic management of germ cell tumor patients undergoing multiple days’ chemotherapy treatment, radiotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (RINV), CINV induced by oral cytotoxic agents and targeted therapies in patients undergoing treatment for solid tumors, adherence to CINV guidelines and the benefits of NEPA (a new agent consisting of a combination of netupitant and palonosetron), and the treatment of breakthrough and refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Additionally, 2 original clinical papers are presented investigating the ramosetron and olanzapine in the management of CINV.

The review article by S. Garcia and P. Gascon provides an extensive overview of the basic knowledge of the NK₁ receptor and substance P biology and the pharmacological basis of the usage of NK₁ receptor antagonists in the management of delayed phase of CINV.

The 5-HT₃ receptor antagonists play an important role in the pathogenesis of the acute phase of CINV. K.-R. Kim et al. presented a pilot study with the potential usage of ramosetron, a tetrahydrobenzimidazole derivative structurally independent of the previously developed 5-HT₃ receptor antagonists, such as ondansetron, granisetron, and tropisetron.

Patients with germ cell tumor undergoing 5 days of cisplatin-based chemotherapy have a different mechanism and pattern of CINV compared to those receiving single day chemotherapy. The efficacy of antiemetic drugs, as observed in single day chemotherapy, is therefore not applicable. In this issue, P. Ranganath et al. from Indiana University discuss current recommendations and future directions for patients undergoing multiple day treatment.

Depending on the site of irradiation, dosing, fractionation, irradiated volume, and radiotherapy techniques, the incidence of nausea and vomiting after radiotherapy is approximately 50–80%. RINV is a very important and not well researched area often underestimated by physicians. K. Jordan et al. include an overview of RINV and current guidelines recommendations as well as future directions.

The treatment of nausea and vomiting caused by oral antineoplastic agents is primarily empirical, consisting of the administration of daily oral antiemetic therapy. The level of evidence of prophylactic antiemetics recommended for these agents is low. A. L. Costa et al. discuss the management of CINV induced by oral cytotoxic agents and targeted therapies in patients undergoing treatment for solid tumors. This article highlights the differences in the classification of emetogenic potential of oral antineoplastic agents between the different international guidelines, as well as different recommendations for prophylactic antiemetic treatments.

NEPA is a new oral single fixed combination agent, containing a highly selective NK₁ RA, netupitant with palonosetron. This agent is a pharmacologically and clinically distinct 5-HT₃ RA. Palonosetron has a longer half-life compared with older 5-HT₃ RAs. Palonosetron works synergistically with netupitant and has the potential to improve the efficacy in the prevention of the delayed phase of CINV when used in combination. P. J. Hesketh et al. discuss the use of NEPA in the context of how NEPA may overcome some of the barriers interfering with adherence to the various antiemetic guidelines.

Several studies have shown that the antipsychotic agent olanzapine is effective in the management of CINV. The pharmacological mechanism of action consists of the blocking of neurotransmitter receptors including dopaminergic at D₁, D₂, D₃, and D₄ brain receptors, serotonergic at , , 5-HT₃, and 5-HT₆ receptors, catecholamines at alpha₁ adrenergic receptors, acetylcholine at muscarinic receptors, and histamine at H₁ receptors. In this special issue, R. M. Navari discusses the treatment of breakthrough and refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with special reference to olanzapine in this setting. In another paper, M. Abe et al. retrospectively analyze the role of olanzapine in 50 gynecologic cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy who had nausea despite the use of standard therapy.

The treatment of CINV is evolving and this special issue highlights some of the recent developments as well as some of the controversies in this important field of oncology.

   Bernardo  Leon  Rapoport  
  Alexander  Molasiotis  
  Haralambos  Raftopoulos  
  Fausto  Roila  

References

M. S. Aapro and D. S. Alberts, “Dexamethasone as an antiemetic in patients treated with cisplatin,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 305, no. 9, article 520, 1981.

G. Falkson and A. J. van Zyl, “A phase I study of a new 5HT3-receptor antagonist, BRL43694A, an agent for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting,” Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 193–196, 1989.

D. B. Smith, E. S. Newlands, O. W. Spruyt et al., “Ondansetron (GR38032F) plus dexamethasone: effective anti-emetic prophylaxis for patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 323–324, 1990.

P. J. Hesketh, S. M. Grunberg, R. J. Gralla et al., “The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin—the aprepitant protocol 052 study group,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 4112–4119, 2003.

S. Poli-Bigelli, J. Rodrigues-Pereira, A. D. Carides et al., “Addition of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Latin America,” Cancer, vol. 97, no. 12, pp. 3090–3098, 2003.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network, “NCNN Guidelines 1.2012: antiemesis 1.2015,” Tech. Rep. 1.2015, 2015.

F. Roila, J. Herrstedt, M. Aapro et al., “Guideline update for MASCC and ESMO in the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: results of the Perugia consensus conference,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 21, supplement 5, pp. v232–v243, 2010.

E. Basch, A. A. Prestrud, P. J. Hesketh et al., “Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 29, no. 31, pp. 4189–4198, 2011.