BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 480564, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/480564

Research Article

In Vitro Propagation, Phytochemical Analysis, and Evaluation of Free Radical Scavenging Property of Scrophularia kakudensis Franch Tissue Extracts

Abinaya Manivannan,¹ Prabhakaran Soundararajan,¹ Yoo Gyeong Park,² and Byoung Ryong Jeong1,2,3

¹Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Republic of Korea
²Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Republic of Korea
³Research Institute of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Republic of Korea

Received 14 September 2015; Accepted 4 October 2015

Academic Editor: Adair Santos

Copyright © 2015 Abinaya Manivannan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The current study deals with in vitro propagation, antioxidant property estimation, and assessment of acacetin content in Scrophularia kakudensis Franch. Adventitious shoot induction was achieved from the nodal explant with the highest number of adventitious shoots per explant (17.4) on Murashige and Skoog’s (MS) medium fortified with 2.0 mg·L⁻¹ 6-benzyladenine (BA) and 0.5 mg L⁻¹ indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Maximum number of roots per plant (16.5) was noted in half strength MS medium supplemented with 0.5 mg·L⁻¹ IAA. The regenerated plants displayed successful survival ratio (95%) in the greenhouse. The highest content of acacetin, a pharmaceutically important flavonoid, was observed in the shoot extracts (in vitro: 32.83 µg·g⁻¹ FW; in vivo: 30.05 µg·g⁻¹ FW) followed by root extracts. Total phenol and flavonoid contents along with free radical scavenging assays revealed the occurrence of larger amount of antioxidants in shoot extract in comparison with callus and root extracts of S. kakudensis. Thus, the outcome of the present study can be highly beneficial for the germplasm conservation and commercial cultivation of S. kakudensis for therapeutic purposes.

1. Introduction

The genus Scrophularia (Scrophulariaceae) consists of 300 species of medicinal plants with notable pharmaceutical importance against several diseases such as inflammation, fever, and gastrointestinal problems [1]. Scrophularia kakudensis Franch is a potential medicinal plant species distributed around the mountains of Korea, Japan, and China with pharmaceutically important secondary metabolites such as acacetin [2] and scrophulasaponins [3]. The morphological characteristics of S. kakudensis include quadrangular, white pilose stem, ovate to narrowly ovate leaf blade, glandular hairy peduncles, and broadly ovoid capsules [4]. Besides its medicinal importance, S. kakudensis is still unexplored due to inadequate healthy plant materials, narrow environmental adaptation, and risk of extinction. Domestication of Scrophularia sp. including S. kakudensis Franch is hindered by seed dormancy [5]. Nevertheless, the above-mentioned difficulties can be resolved by plant tissue culture approaches. In recent years, plant tissue culture has developed into a powerful tool for mass propagation, conservation, cryopreservation, and genetic manifestations of medicinal plants [6, 7]. Thus, the first objective of the current work is to devise an efficient mass propagation protocol for S. kakudensis.

As mentioned above the S. kakudensis plants are known for the presence of important secondary metabolite acacetin. Acacetin is a 5, 7-dihydroxy-4′-methoxyflavone, reported with several therapeutic effects such as anticancerous, antidiabetic, antipyretic, antiperoxidative, anti-inflammatory, antiplasmodial, and antiproliferative activities by inducing apoptosis and blocking the progression of cell cycles [8–13]. Moreover, our recent in silico analysis revealed the effective binding of acacetin towards the aldose reductase enzyme, a vital drug target in diabetic and cancer treatment [14]. Though the presence of acacetin has been demonstrated by Kim et al. [2] in S. kakudensis, for the first time in the current work the content of acacetin in shoot and root extracts of in vitro plantlets of S. kakudensis has been determined and compared with the in vivo extracts. In addition, the antioxidant potentials of in vitro tissues were also examined to gain insight into the free radical scavenging nature of S. kakudensis extracts. Antioxidants are compounds that inhibit the substrate oxidation possibly by acting as the free radical scavenger. Broadly, most of the medicinally important bioactive secondary metabolites are phenols and flavonoids. These therapeutic metabolites prevent several life threatening degenerative diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular, and neurological disorders caused by oxidative stress [15]. The oxidative stress leads to the excess production of highly reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are extremely harmful to cells. Among ROS, hydrogen peroxide, superoxide, nitric oxide, and hydroxyl ions are the most notable radicals detrimental to the cells [16]. Eventually, the increase in the ROS level can lead to cell death by oxidation of the biomacromolecules such as protein, DNA, and unsaturated fatty acids [17]. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the plant tissue containing large amount of antioxidants for the characterization and identification of novel lead molecules for drug discovery purposes. Overall, the current study has established an efficient in vitro propagation procedure followed by the characterization of antioxidant properties of in vitro plants in comparison with greenhouse grown in vivo plants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Culture Condition

Seeds of S. kakudensis obtained from the Wild Plant Seed Bank, Daejeon, Korea, were decontaminated with 80% (v/v) ethanol for 30 seconds followed by 1.0% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) for 4 min. Excess NaClO was washed off in distilled water (dis. H₂O) for 5–7 times and then the seeds were blot dried. After sterilization, seeds were sown on the half strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) [18] basal medium with 3% (w/v) sucrose and 0.8% (w/v) agar. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.75 using 0.1 N NaOH or 0.1 N HCl and autoclaved at 121°C for 15 min. After 5 weeks, nodal segments obtained from a single seedling were subcultured in the plant growth regulator- (PGR-) free MS medium until enough explants were acquired for micropropagation. All the cultures were maintained at 25°C and 80% relative humidity (RH) under a 16 h photoperiod with 50 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) provided by cool white fluorescent light (40 W tubes, Philips, Netherlands).

2.2. Adventitious Shoot Induction and Proliferation

Nodal explants from four-week-old shoots were inoculated on the MS medium supplemented with various concentrations (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 mg L⁻¹) of 6-benzyladenine (BA), kinetin (Kn), and thidiazuron (TDZ) alone or in combination with 0.5 or 1.0 mg L⁻¹ indole acetic acid (IAA) for adventitious shoot induction. Thidiazuron was filter-sterilized and added to the autoclaved medium, whereas other plant growth regulators (PGRs) were added to the basal medium prior to pH adjustment and sterilization. After five weeks of inoculation, shoot bud induction percentage and average number of shoots induced per explant were recorded. In each treatment, 30 explants were used and the experiment was repeated thrice for reproducibility.

2.3. Shoot Elongation, In Vitro Rooting, and Acclimatization

The clump of microshoots were separated and transferred to MS medium devoid of PGRs for shoot elongation. After three weeks, the elongated shoots (2–4 cm) were transferred to half strength or full strength MS medium with or without 0.5 mg·L⁻¹ or 1.0 mg·L⁻¹ of IAA, indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), and α-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA). After three weeks, root induction percentage, number of roots per plant, and length of the longest root were measured. Plantlets with well-developed roots were transplanted into 10 cm pots containing a greenhouse growing medium (Tosilee Medium, Shian Precision Co., Jinju, Korea) and grown in a glasshouse at Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea, under a normal day light condition with night/day set temperatures of 27/19°C and 60–70% RH. The survival ratios of the micropropagated plants were recorded after five weeks of acclimatization.

2.4. Estimation of Phytochemicals in Tissue Extracts

2.4.1. Preparation of Plant Extracts

For phytochemical analysis and antioxidant capacity assessment, 4-week-old in vitro plants cultured in MS medium without PGRs, callus (4 weeks old) induced by 3.0 mg·L⁻¹ BA, and 4-week-old greenhouse grown in vivo plants (separated into shoot and root) were fractioned with methanol according to Manivannan et al. [19]. Briefly, the plant samples (0.5 g) were lyophilized and extracted with 5 mL of 80% (v/v) methanol overnight under 150 rpm in a rotating shaker. The resulting homogenates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min and the supernatant was employed for the in vitro assays.

2.4.2. Total Phenol and Flavonoid Estimation

Total phenol content of the extracts was estimated by Folin-Ciocalteu principle according to the procedure of Manivannan et al. [19]. Aliquot of the extracts (0.1 mL) made up to 1 mL with distilled water was mixed with 0.5 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (1 : 1 with water) and 2.5 mL of sodium carbonate solution (7.5%). The reaction mixture was vortexed vigorously and incubated in the dark for 40 min. After incubation the absorbance was recorded at 725 nm and the total phenol content was expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAE). The total flavonoid composition was determined based on the aluminum chloride calorimetric method as mentioned by Ordoñez et al. [20] with slight modifications. Samples (0.1 mL) were made up to 1 mL with 80% methanol and used for the analysis by adding 1 mL of 2% aluminum chloride solution. The absorbance of the reaction mixture was measured at 415 nm after 30 min incubation and the total flavonoids were calculated from the standard quercetin calibration curve.

2.4.3. Quantification of Acacetin Using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

The plant extract preparation and estimation of acacetin were carried out according to the procedure outlined by Yang et al. [21]. Briefly, the samples (5 g) were lyophilized and refluxed in 50 mL methanol for 24 h in rotatory shaker at 150 rpm and concentrated under reduced pressure. The concentrated extracts were filtered in 0.45 μM syringe filter prior to chromatographic analysis in a 1200 series HPLC instrument with diode array detector (DAD) (Waters, MA, USA). The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile (100% solvent A) and 1.0% glacial acetic acid (solvent B). The chromatographic separation was performed with solvent proportion of 37 : 63 using a ODS HYPERSIL column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μM) with 1.25 mL·min⁻¹ flow rate with 10 μL sample injection volume. The absorbance of the standards and samples was recorded at 326 nm. The quantity of acacetin content was elucidated from the standard calibration curve.

2.5. Antioxidant Properties of Tissue Extracts

2.5.1. Superoxide () Radical Scavenging Assay

Superoxide scavenging activity of the extracts was determined based on the ability of the extracts to inhibit formazan production by bleaching the superoxide radicals generated by nitroblue tetrazolium salt with riboflavin and light [16]. The extracts (0.1 mL) were added to the reaction mixture (0.1 mg NBT, 12 mM EDTA, and 20 μg riboflavin in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.6)) and illuminated by light. After 90 seconds the absorbance was measured at 590 nm.

2.5.2. Nitric Oxide (NO) Radical Scavenging Assay

In this assay the inhibition of NO production by the extracts was determined using sodium nitroprusside (SNP) mediated generation of nitric oxide [16]. The nitric oxide spontaneously produced by SNP reacts with the oxygen to form nitrite ions that can be measured by Griess reagent. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 10 mM SNP in phosphate buffered saline to the extracts (0.1 mL) and allowed to stand for 150 min at room temperature. After incubation, 0.5 mL of freshly prepared Griess reagent (2% phosphoric acid, 1% sulfanilamide, and 0.1% N-(1-naphthyl) ethylenediamine dihydrochloride) was added and the absorbance was determined at 546 nm.

2.5.3. Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂) Radical Scavenging Assay

For H₂O₂ scavenging assay, 0.6 mL of H₂O₂ (2 mM) was mixed with the extracts and incubated for 10 min. The absorbance was noted at 230 nm against a blank solution devoid of H₂O₂ according to the method described by Kumaran and Joel Karunakaran [16].

2.5.4. 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging

The stable DPPH radical scavenging ability of the extracts was analyzed by mixing sample extracts (40 μL) to 1,960 μL of 0.1 mM methanolic solution of DPPH and allowed to stand for 25 min under dark conditions. The absorbance of the sample was measured at 517 nm according to Manivannan et al. [19].

For all the free radical scavenging assay ascorbic acid was employed as the standard. The radical scavenging % was calculated using the formula , where is the absorbance value of the control (reaction mixture without extract) and is the OD value of the extract or ascorbic acid.

2.5.5. Hydroxyl Radicals Induced Plasmid DNA Strand Scission

The DNA protection ability of the extracts was determined by hydroxyl radicals mediated strand scission assay according to Abbas et al. [22]. Briefly, the pET 28 plasmid DNA (0.5 μg) was mixed with FeSO₄ (1 mM, 2 μL), extract or ascorbic acid (2 μL), H₂O₂ (20 mM, 4 μL), and phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0, 2 μL) and incubated in 37°C for 1 h. The extent of DNA damage protection was analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All the experiments were set up in a completely randomized design with three replications per treatment and the assays were performed in triplicate to verify the reproducibility of the results. Significant differences among the treatments were determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan multiple range tests at a 5% probability level by using SAS computer package (SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Adventitious Shoot Induction and Proliferation

In the present investigation, adventitious shoot organogenesis was established from nodal explants derived from the axenic in vitro grown shoots by different concentrations and combinations of PGRs. Initially, the seeds were germinated in vitro and the seedlings were grown in PGR-free MS medium. After three subcultures in four-week interval, the nodal explants were excised and inoculated on the hormone-free MS medium (control), MS medium containing different concentrations, and combinations of PGRs for shoot multiplication. Explants cultured on the PGR-free MS medium produced only a single shoot per explant. Similarly, the explant cultured on shoot induction medium supplemented with three different cytokinins produced several adventitious shoots. Initially, the nodal explants cultured on the cytokinins-fortified medium were bloated within 10–12 days and the adventitious shoots appeared as small multiple protuberances on the cut surfaces (Figure 1(a)). After two weeks, caulogenesis was identified with small leaf-like structures observed from the outgrowths which subsequently developed into adventitious shoots (Figure 1(b)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 1: Adventitious shoot organogenesis in S. kakudensis Franch. (a) Clump of green colored protuberances appeared from the nodal explant. (b) Early stage of adventitious shoot induction with small leaves indicated by an arrow. (c) Adventitious shoots induced after three weeks. (d) Shoot elongation. (e) In vitro root induction from the shoot base. (f) Acclimatized plants in a greenhouse.

Among the cytokinins tested, the greatest frequency (100%) of shoot induction and number of shoots (12.4) were obtained on the medium supplemented with 2.0 mg L⁻¹ BA (Table 1). However, increase in concentration of BA to 3.0 mg L⁻¹ decreased the shoot induction frequency and led to the formation of dark green colored complex calli on the leaf edges. The exceptional explant response to BA can be due to its rapid metabolism and ability to activate other endogenous hormones inside the plant tissue [23]. Similarly, the positive role of BA in shoot induction was also noted on other species of Scrophularia such as Scrophularia takesimensis [24] and Scrophularia yoshimurae [1]. Moreover, 2.0 mg·L⁻¹ Kn also induced the greatest shoot induction frequency (100%), but the number of shoots formed per explant (8.5) was lesser as compared to the BA treatment. Callus formation at the nodal base appeared on the TDZ-supplemented medium after 13 days. In addition, most of the adventitious shoots on the TDZ-supplemented medium were hyperhydric irrespective of its concentration. Hyperhydricity refers to the physiological malformation of the regenerated shoots that result in excessive hydration, low lignification, and poor regeneration. Appearances of hyperhydricity in shoots are generally characterized by several stress conditions during the process of tissue culture and also due to the usage of higher concentrations of cytokinins such as TDZ [25]. Generally, cytokinins used in combination with auxin enhance the adventitious shoot induction [26]. In the current study, addition of IAA (0.5 or 1.0 mg·L⁻¹) along with BA (0.5–3.0 mg·L⁻¹) has gradually enhanced the number of shoots induced per explant as compared to the medium containing BA alone (Table 2). The greatest number of shoots per explant (17.4) was obtained on the MS medium containing 2.0 mg·L⁻¹ BA and 0.5 mg·L⁻¹ IAA (Figure 1(c)). However, the adventitious shoot elongation was hindered in the shoot induction medium containing either BA alone or in combination with IAA. Therefore, the multiple shoot clumps were transferred to the MS medium devoid of PGRs for shoot elongation (Figure 1(d)).

Table 1: Effect of different concentrations of cytokinins on adventitious shoot induction from the nodal explant of S. kakudensis Franch.

Treatment
BA
(mg⋅L⁻¹)
Kn
(mg⋅L⁻¹)
TDZ
(mg⋅L⁻¹)
Shoot induction (%)
Number of shoots/explant

1
0.5
—
—
80.5 ± 0.91
3.1 ± 0.27f

2
1.0
—
—
100.0 ± 0.00a
6.4 ± 0.14c

3
2.0
—
—
100.0 ± 0.00a
12.4 ± 0.14a

4
3.0
—
—
76.2 ± 0.65e
6.2 ± 0.13dc

5
—
0.5
—
77.3 ± 0.54e
3.0 ± 0.14f

6
—
1.0
—
91.4 ± 0.41b
5.8 ± 0.20d

7
—
2.0
—
100.0 ± 0.00a
8.5 ± 0.19b

8
—
3.0
—
72.9 ± 0.65f
4.2 ± 0.17e

9
—
—
0.5
87.1 ± 0.51c
6.7 ± 0.17c

10
—
—
1.0
76.6 ± 0.71e
4.3 ± 0.18e

11
—
—
2.0
57.5 ± 0.81g
2.5 ± 0.19g

12
—
—
3.0
27.2 ± 2.31h
1.4 ± 0.14h

Values represent the mean ± SE of three replications, each with five explants.

Means followed by same letter(s) within a column are not significantly different ().

Table 2: Effect of BA and IAA combinations on adventitious shoot induction.

BA
(mg⋅L⁻¹)
IAA
(mg⋅L⁻¹)
Shoot induction (%)
Number of shoots/explant

0.5
0.5
93.8 ± 0.29
4.5 ± 0.28f

1.0
0.5
100 ± 0.00a
10.0 ± 0.47c

2.0
0.5
100 ± 0.00a
17.4 ± 0.33a

3.0
0.5
77.1 ± 1.03e
8.2 ± 0.42d

0.5
1.0
95.3 ± 0.14b
3.6 ± 0.14f

1.0
1.0
100 ± 0.00a
8.7 ± 0.13d

2.0
1.0
100 ± 0.00a
14.5 ± 0.51b

3.0
1.0
78.6 ± 0.84d
6.8 ± 0.47e

Values represent the mean ± SE of three replications, each with five explants.

Means followed by same letter(s) within a column are not significantly different ().

3.2. In Vitro Rooting and Acclimatization

For in vitro root induction, individual shoots were excised from the clusters of elongated shoots and cultured on either half or full strength MS medium supplemented with different auxins such as IAA, IBA, and NAA at 0.5 or 1.0 mg·L⁻¹. Within two weeks of culture, roots started to emerge from the shoot base. Among the various root induction media used, IAA and IBA supplemented with the full strength MS medium induced rooting in all shoots (Table 3). Though optimal root induction was observed in the full strength MS medium, the mean number of roots and root length were significantly affected. The half strength MS medium with 0.5 mg·L⁻¹ IAA produced maximum number of roots (16.5) with the greatest root length (13.2 cm) (Figure 1(e)). IAA has been considered as the major auxin in plants utilized for adventitious rooting [27]. Though the addition of IBA supported rooting the number of roots produced and the root length were comparatively lesser than IAA treatments. However, supplementation of NAA with both half and full strength media displayed root formation at the nodal region of the stem with basal callusing. In accordance with Arikat et al. [28], NAA exhibited the least rooting potential. Moreover, the auxin NAA might induce stressful environment leading to the formation of nodular roots. Healthy, uniform, and well-rooted plantlets were acclimatized in the greenhouse and produced true leaves after 12 days. Overall, 95% of survival ratio was achieved after five weeks of acclimatization in the greenhouse (Figure 1(f)).

Table 3: Effect of various auxins and strength of the MS medium on in vitro root induction.

Medium
PGR
Conc. (mg⋅L⁻¹)
Rooting
(%)
Root length (mm)
Number of roots per explant
Nodular rooting (%)

1/2 strength MS
IAA
0.5
100.0 ± 0.00
13.2 ± 0.53a
16.5 ± 0.33a
00.0 ± 0.00e

1.0
99.2 ± 0.27ba
11.3 ± 0.22c
10.7 ± 0.35c
00.0 ± 0.00e

IBA
0.5
96.6 ± 0.35b
8.5 ± 0.28d
6.6 ± 0.30f
00.0 ± 0.00e

1.0
93.9 ± 0.59c
10.8 ± 0.27c
4.5 ± 0.19g
00.0 ± 0.00e

NAA
0.5
86.2 ± 0.52d
7.0 ± 0.28e
3.9 ± 0.19hg
29.5 ± 1.5d

1.0
58.8 ± 2.5e
2.9 ± 0.28g
3.3 ± 0.22hi
79.1 ± 0.56b

Full strength
MS
IAA
0.5
100.0 ± 0.00a
12.3 ± 0.39b
9.2 ± 0.27d
00.0 ± 0.00e

1.0
100.0 ± 0.00a
11.3 ± 0.22c
12.7 ± 0.39b
00.0 ± 0.00e

IBA
0.5
100.0 ± 0.00a
8.5 ± 0.28d
6.3 ± 0.22f
00.0 ± 0.00e

1.0
100.0 ± 0.00a
10.8 ± 0.27c
8.4 ± 0.14e
00.0 ± 0.00e

NAA
0.5
98.8 ± 0.27ba
5.0 ± 0.25f
3.9 ± 0.19hg
53.6 ± 0.19c

1.0
85.4 ± 1.90d
2.9 ± 0.28g
2.8 ± 0.32i
94.5 ± 0.76a

Values represent the mean ± SE of three replications, each with five explants.

Means followed by same letter(s) within a column are not significantly different ().

3.3. Estimation of Phytochemicals

3.3.1. Total Phenol and Flavonoid Estimation

The characterization of phytochemical contents of different tissues of S. kakudensis is crucial to determine its pharmaceutical importance. The total phenol and flavonoid contents of in vitro shoot extract (ISE), in vitro root extract (IRE), callus extract (CE), in vivo shoot extract (SE), and in vivo root extract (RE) were shown in Figure 2. Among the tissues, shoot contained larger amount of total phenol (Figure 2(a)) and flavonoid contents (Figure 2(b)) than root extracts. According to Amoo et al. [29] the aerial parts of plants are often suitable for the synthesis and accumulation of secondary metabolites in abundance compared to the underground parts. Moreover, the results indicated the accumulation levels of total phenols and flavonoids were nonsignificantly different in ISE and SE. Furthermore, IRE and RE displayed nonsignificant increase in phenol content and RE consisted of higher flavonoids than IRE. Moreover, the CE was also noted with the significant amount of total phenol (31.12 μg GAE·mg⁻¹ FW) and flavonoid phytochemical contents (14.88 μg quercetin·mg⁻¹ FW). The variation in the production of bioactive compounds in different tissues can be due to the differences in the tissue dependent synthesis and accumulation of phytochemicals, physiological condition of the plant part, and endogenous hormone levels [30]. This result denoted that the contents of phytochemicals in seed derived and in vitro derived plants were similar and the in vitro plantlets can be considered as the alternate for the seed grown plants in terms of therapeutic values.

(a)

(b)

Figure 2: Phytochemical contents of in vitro and in vivo extracts. (a-b) Total phenol and total flavonoid contents present in vitro shoot extract (ISE), in vitro root extract (IRE), callus extracts (CEs), in vivo shoot extract (SE), and in vivo root extract (RE) of S. kakudensis. Different letters in one measurement indicate statistically significant difference at by Duncan multiple range test.

3.3.2. Assessment of Acacetin Content in Tissue Extracts

The highest level of acacetin was estimated in shoot extracts of S. kakudensis (Figure 3). Among the extracts, ISE (32.83 μg·g⁻¹ FW) and SE (30.05 μg·g⁻¹ FW) were noted with the maximum acacetin content followed by the root extracts of both in vitro (IRE: 19.52 μg·g⁻¹ FW) and ex vitro (RE: 18.23 μg·g⁻¹ FW). The least amount of acacetin was estimated in the callus extract (14.91 μg·g⁻¹ FW). Similarly the synthesis of acacetin in leaf tissue was recorded in Clerodendrum inerme, Dioscoreophyllum cumminsii, and Ocimum basilicum [31–33]. The slight increase in the accumulation of acacetin (an individual flavonoid) in in vitro plantlets might be triggered by the plant tissue culture environment and endogenous hormone modulations. According to Shohael et al. [34], the in vitro conditions enhance the secondary metabolite production through the modulation of plant primary metabolism. In addition, synthesis and gene expression levels of the secondary metabolites can be greatly influenced by the nutrient contents and plant hormones employed during the in vitro culture [35]. Likewise, the secondary metabolites production in in vitro plantlets was higher in Swertia chirayita than in vivo plantlets [36].

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

Figure 3: HPLC results of acacetin content estimation in in vitro and in vivo plant extracts. The representative peaks obtained for acacetin in (a) in vitro shoot extract, (b) in vivo shoot extract, (c) callus extracts, (d) in vitro root extract, and (e) in vivo root extract of S. kakudensis and (f) reference. (g) The quantification of acacetin in tissue extracts of S. kakudensis. Different letters in one measurement indicate statistically significant difference at by Duncan multiple range test.

3.4. Free Radical Scavenging Potential

3.4.1. Nitric Oxide (NO) Radical Scavenging Assay

The results of NO scavenging assay revealed the substantial ability of the extracts to scavenge NO radical (Figure 4(a)). ISE scavenged 83.49% of NO radicals followed by SE (82.60%). Moreover, the CE exhibited 71.74% of NO inhibition followed by root extracts, respectively. In biological systems, the excess generation of NO radicals leads to various ailments such as chronic inflammatory disorders, carcinogenesis, and atherosclerosis [37]. Therefore, it is highly important to determine the ability of the extracts to inhibit the NO radicals to prevent dreadful diseases.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 4: Free radical scavenging potentials of in vitro and in vivo extracts. (a–d) Nitric oxide scavenging, superoxide scavenging, hydrogen peroxide scavenging, and DPPH radical scavenging activities of in vitro shoot extract (ISE), in vitro root extract (IRE), callus extracts (CEs), in vivo shoot extract (SE), and in vivo root extract (RE) of S. kakudensis and ascorbic acid (AA). Different letters in one measurement indicate statistically significant difference at by Duncan multiple range test.

3.4.2. Superoxide () Radical Scavenging Assay

All the tissue extracts inhibited the formation of formazan by scavenging the radicals generated by NBT-riboflavin-light complex and the scavenging capacity of the extracts was compared with the positive control, ascorbic acid (Figure 4(b)). Even though all the extracts efficiently inhibited , SE (76.96%) exhibited excellent scavenging. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the scavenging ability of ISE (68.10%) and CE (67.66%). However, the least scavenging potential was noted on the root extracts (RE: 57.62%; IRE: 55.25%). The scavenging ability of ascorbic acid was observed as 81.02%. Superoxide radicals are highly harmful to the cell organelles and superoxide radicals acts as the precursor for the formation of ROS. In addition the larger amount of in the cells enhances the dismutation reaction that results in H₂O₂ production further leading to the oxidative stress [17]. Therefore, efficient scavenging of is inevitable for the antioxidants.

3.4.3. Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂) Radical Scavenging Assay

The ability of the tissue extracts to inhibit the hydrogen peroxide radicals was determined and compared with ascorbic acid (Figure 4(c)). The H₂O₂ scavenging percentage of the extracts ranged from 61.8 to 73.7%. As expected the ascorbic acid scavenged the greatest amount of H₂O₂ radicals (90.42%) followed by ISE (73.07%), SE (72.2%), and CE (67.21%). Moreover, the root extracts displayed H₂O₂ elimination activity with moderate scavenging percentage (IRE: 63.6% and RE: 61.8%). In general, H₂O₂ is nonreactive but it leads to the production of other toxic free radicals like hydroxyl radicals and causes cell death. Hence, it is necessary for the antioxidant system to scavenge H₂O₂ radicals and detoxify the cellular environment. Furthermore, reports suggest that the phenolic compounds readily act as H₂O₂ scavengers [17]. Thus, the larger amount of phenolic compounds in the shoot extracts could have attributed to the elevated H₂O₂ scavenging capacity.

3.4.4. 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging Assay

The antioxidant property of the extracts was further confirmed by the DPPH radical scavenging assay. This assay has been widely used in in vitro studies to assess the antioxidant property of the plant extracts. All the extracts displayed DPPH radical scavenging activity (Figure 4(d)). The highest DPPH scavenging has been noted in the ISE (85.25%) and SE (83.93%). Furthermore, the DPPH radical scavenging percentage of CE is recorded as 78.27%. In accordance with other radical scavenging assays IRE (69.41%) and RE (68.90%) exhibited moderate radical inhibition. DPPH is a purple colored stable organic radical which upon accepting an electron from an antioxidant becomes yellow that can be spectrometrically read. Hence, the amount of antioxidants in the reaction mixture can be evaluated by the degree of discoloration [30].

Furthermore, the Pearson correlation analysis revealed the existence of strong positive correlation between the total phenol and flavonoid contents and antioxidant potentials of the tissue extracts (Table 4).

Table 4: Correlation coefficient () of phytochemicals and antioxidant activities of in vitro and in vivo tissue extracts of S. kakudensis Franch.

Extract
Phytochemicals
Correlation coefficient of DPPH
Correlation coefficient of
Correlation coefficient of H₂O₂
Correlation coefficient of NO

ISE
TP
0.95
0.96
0.99
0.90

TF
0.83
0.95
0.96
0.74

IRE
TP
0.92
0.92
0.70
0.72

TF
0.94
0.95
0.75
0.77

CE
TP
0.76
0.73
0.98
0.72

TF
0.93
0.90
0.99
0.90

SE
TP
0.99
0.99
0.99
0.83

TF
0.99
0.99
0.98
0.82

RE
TP
0.99
0.92
0.95
0.82

TF
0.82
0.95
0.92
0.99

TP: total phenol content; TF: total flavonoid content; DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl scavenging %; : superoxide scavenging %; H₂O₂: hydrogen peroxide scavenging %; NO: nitric oxide scavenging %.

Correlation significant at and 0.01, respectively.

3.4.5. Hydroxyl Radicals Induced Plasmid DNA Strand Scission

The DNA strand scission assay illustrated the ability of all the extracts to render protection against the hydroxyl radicals induced DNA damage (Figure 5). During the strand nicking the plasmid DNA will be separated into open circular, linear, and supercoiled form. Based on the intensity of native supercoiled bands the DNA protection capacity was as evaluated and compared with the positive control ascorbic acid (lane 1). The supplementation of SE, RE ISE, IRE, and CE has protected the DNA from the H₂O₂ radicals (lanes 2–6). However the in vitro extracts (lanes 4–6) exhibited slightly increased DNA prevention activity compared to the in vivo extracts (lanes 2 and 3). In lane 7 the H₂O₂ without any extracts (negative control) induced complete breakage of DNA strands. The excess production of ROS oxidizes the nitrogen bases of the DNA molecules leading to the oxidative damage [22]. Therefore, it is necessary for an antioxidant to protect DNA from the ROS. Thus the extracts were proved to contain strong antioxidant capacity. Overall, the results demonstrated the strong antioxidant properties were attributed in the aerial part of S. kakudensis in comparison with the underground part.

Figure 5: DNA protection potential of in vitro tissues and commercial extracts. Lane 1: positive control (2 μg ascorbic acid + 50 ng DNA). Lane 2: 20 mM H₂O₂ + 50 ng DNA + 2 μg in vivo shoot extract (SE). Lane 3: 20 mM H₂O₂ + 50 ng DNA + 2 μg in vivo root extract (RE). Lane 4: 20 mM H₂O₂ + 50 ng DNA + 2 μg in vitro shoot extract (ISE). Lane 5: 20 mM H₂O₂ + 50 ng DNA + 2 μg in vitro root extract (IRE). Lane 6: 20 mM H₂O₂ + 50 ng DNA + 2 μg callus extracts (CEs). Lane 7: negative control (20 mM H₂O₂ + 50 ng DNA) of S. kakudensis. Oc: open circular form, Li: linear form, and Sc: supercoiled form of plasmid DNA.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the current endeavor has accomplished a widespread investigation of in vitro propagation by adventitious shoot proliferation, phytochemical evaluation, and free radical scavenging analysis in pharmaceutically important S. kakudensis. Therefore, the present work can contribute to the large-scale production of S. kakudensis for germplasm conservation and commercial cultivation. In addition, the determination of acacetin content and free radical scavenging potential of S. kakudensis tissue extracts can be utilized for the therapeutic benefits. Thus, the difficulty of acquiring the in vivo plants from seeds can be addressed using plant tissue culture approach established in the present study without compromising the medicinal value using in vitro propagated S. kakudensis plants.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

Abinaya Manivannan and Prabhakaran Soundararajan were supported by a scholarship from the Brain Korea 21 (BK21) Plus Program, Ministry of Education, Korea. The authors are thankful to Wild Plant Seed Bank, Daejeon, Korea, for providing S. kakudensis seeds and Dr. Sang Uk Choi, Central Instrument Facility, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea, for assisting in HPLC analysis. The authors acknowledge Dr. Sandeep Kumar Verma, Department of Horticulture, Gyeongsang National University, Korea, for providing valuable suggestions to improve the quality of this paper.

References

H.-S. Tsay, C.-Y. Lee, D. C. Agrawal, and S. Basker, “Influence of ventilation closure, gelling agent and explant type on shoot bud proliferation and hyperhydricity in Scrophularia yoshimurae—a medicinal plant,” In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology—Plant, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 445–449, 2006.

H. Kim, M. Ahn, and S. Lee, “Isolation and identification of phytochemical constituents from Scrophularia takesimensis,” Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, vol. 6, no. 22, pp. 3923–3930, 2012.

A. Yamamoto, T. Miyase, A. Ueno, and T. Maeda, “Serophulasaponins II-IV, new saikosaponin homologs from Scrophularia kakudensis FRANCH,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1780–1783, 1993.

D. Y. Hong, H. B. Yang, and C. L. Jin, “Scrophularia,” in Flora of China, Z. Y. Wu and P. H. Raven, Eds., pp. 11–20, Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 1998.

Y. H. Ahn, S. J. Lee, and K. H. Kang, “Study of artificial propagation of native Scrophularia takesimensis,” Proceedings of the Korean Society of Environment and Ecology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 153–156, 2006.

S. Gonçalves, L. Fernandes, and A. Romano, “High-frequency in vitro propagation of the endangered species Tuberaria major,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 359–363, 2010.

C. Gopi and P. Ponmurugan, “Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf callus of Ocimum basilicum L,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 260–264, 2006.

K.-H. Shen, S.-H. Hung, L.-T. Yin et al., “Acacetin, a flavonoid, inhibits the invasion and migration of human prostate cancer DU145 cells via inactivation of the p38 MAPK signaling pathway,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 333, no. 1-2, pp. 279–291, 2010.

A. Rauf, R. Khan, H. Khan, B. Ullah, and S. Pervez, “Antipyretic and antinociceptive potential of extract/fractions of Potentilla evestita and its isolated compound, acacetin,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 14, no. 1, article 448, 2014.

M. R. Cholbi, M. Paya, and M. J. Alcaraz, “Inhibitory effects of phenolic compounds on CCl₄-induced microsomal lipid peroxidation,” Experientia, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 195–199, 1991.

Y.-H. Liao, P. J. Houghton, and J. R. S. Hoult, “Novel and known constituents from Buddleja species and their activity against leukocyte eicosanoid generation,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1241–1245, 1999.

C. Kraft, K. Jenett-Siems, K. Siems et al., “In vitro antiplasmodial evaluation of medicinal plants from Zimbabwe,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 123–128, 2003.

Y.-L. Hsu, P.-L. Kuo, and C.-C. Lin, “Acacetin inhibits the proliferation of Hep G2 by blocking cell cycle progression and inducing apoptosis,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 823–829, 2004.

A. Manivannan, P. Soundararajan, Y. G. Park, S. Sakkiah, and B. R. Jeong, “Binding mode investigation of polyphenols from Scrophularia targeting human aldose reductase using molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations,” Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2015, Article ID 434256, 12 pages, 2015.

J. E. Kinsella, E. Frankel, B. German, and J. Kanner, “Possible mechanisms for the protective role of antioxidants in wine and plant foods,” Food Technology, vol. 47, pp. 85–89, 1993.

A. Kumaran and R. Joel Karunakaran, “In vitro antioxidant activities of methanol extracts of five Phyllanthus species from India,” LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 344–352, 2007.

B. Halliwell and J. M. C. Gutteridge, Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, vol. 3, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 4th edition, 2007.

T. Murashige and F. Skoog, “A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 473–497, 1962.

A. Manivannan, P. Soundararajan, N. Halimah, C. H. Ko, and B. R. Jeong, “Blue LED light enhances growth, phytochemical contents, and antioxidant enzyme activities of Rehmannia glutinosa cultured in vitro,” Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 105–113, 2015.

A. A. L. Ordoñez, J. D. Gomez, M. A. Vattuone, and M. I. Isla, “Antioxidant activities of Sechium edule (Jacq.) Swartz extracts,” Food Chemistry, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 452–458, 2006.

W.-J. Yang, C. Liu, Z.-Y. Gu et al., “Protective effects of acacetin isolated from Ziziphora clinopodioides Lam. (Xintahua) on neonatal rat cardiomyocytes,” Chinese Medicine, vol. 9, article 28, 2014.

S. R. Abbas, S. M. Sabir, S. D. Ahmad, A. A. Boligon, and M. L. Athayde, “Phenolic profile, antioxidant potential and DNA damage protecting activity of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum),” Food Chemistry, vol. 147, pp. 10–16, 2014.

R. K. Sharma and A. K. Wakhlu, “Regeneration of Heracleum candicans wall plants from callus cultures through organogenesis,” Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 71–72, 2003.

I. Sivanesan, S. J. Hwang, and B. R. Jeong, “Influence of plant growth regulators on axillary shoot multiplication and iron source on growth of Scrophularia takesimensis Nakai—a rare endemic medicinal plant,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 7, no. 24, pp. 4484–4490, 2008.

I. Sivanesan, J. Y. Song, S. J. Hwang, and B. R. Jeong, “Micropropagation of Cotoneaster wilsonii Nakai—a rare endemic ornamental plant,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 55–63, 2011.

B. K. Ghimire, C. Y. Yu, and I.-M. Chung, “Direct shoot organogenesis and assessment of genetic stability in regenerants of Solanum aculeatissimum Jacq.,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 455–464, 2012.

F. T. Davies Jr. and H. T. Hartmann, “The physiological basis of adventitious root formation,” in International Symposium on Vegetative Propagation of Woody Species, vol. 227, pp. 113–120, 1987.

N. A. Arikat, F. M. Jawad, N. S. Karam, and R. A. Shibli, “Micropropagation and accumulation of essential oils in wild sage (Salvia fruticosa Mill.),” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 100, no. 1–4, pp. 193–202, 2004.

S. O. Amoo, A. O. Aremu, and J. van Staden, “In vitro plant regeneration, secondary metabolite production and antioxidant activity of micropropagated Aloe arborescens Mill,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 345–358, 2012.

J. J. Chavan, N. B. Gaikwad, S. D. Umdale, P. R. Kshirsagar, K. V. Bhat, and S. R. Yadav, “Efficiency of direct and indirect shoot organogenesis, molecular profiling, secondary metabolite production and antioxidant activity of micropropagated Ceropegia santapaui,” Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2014.

K. Srisook, E. Srisook, W. Nachaiyo et al., “Bioassay-guided isolation and mechanistic action of anti-inflammatory agents from Clerodendrum inerme leaves,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 165, pp. 94–102, 2015.

H. O. B. Oloyede, T. O. Bello, T. O. Ajiboye, and M. O. Salawu, “Antidiabetic and antidyslipidemic activities of aqueous leaf extract of Dioscoreophyllum cumminsii (Stapf) Diels in alloxan-induced diabetic rats,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 166, pp. 313–322, 2015.

L. Silva, B. Pezzini, and L. Soares, “Spectrophotometric determination of the total flavonoid content in Ocimum basilicum L. (Lamiaceae) leaves,” Pharmacognosy Magazine, vol. 11, no. 41, pp. 96–101, 2015.

A. M. Shohael, M. B. Ali, K. W. Yu, E. J. Hahn, R. Islam, and K. Y. Paek, “Effect of light on oxidative stress, secondary metabolites and induction of antioxidant enzymes in Eleutherococcus senticosus somatic embryos in bioreactor,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1179–1185, 2006.

P. Baskaran, M. Moyo, and J. Van Staden, “In vitro plant regeneration, phenolic compound production and pharmacological activities of Coleonema pulchellum,” South African Journal of Botany, vol. 90, pp. 74–79, 2014.

V. Kumar, S. K. Singh, R. Bandopadhyay, M. M. Sharma, and S. Chandra, “In vitro organogenesis secondary metabolite production and heavy metal analysis in Swertia chirayita,” Central European Journal of Biology, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 686–698, 2014.

S. Moncada, R. M. J. Palmer, and E. A. Higgs, “Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 109–142, 1991.