BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 859073, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/859073

Review Article

Intramyocardial Hemorrhage: An Enigma for Cardiac MRI?

Camilla Calvieri,¹ Gabriele Masselli,² Riccardo Monti,² Matteo Spreca,² Gian Franco Gualdi,² and Francesco Fedele¹

¹Department of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Nephrologic and Geriatric Sciences, La Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy
²Department of Radiology, La Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy

Received 31 January 2014; Revised 25 September 2014; Accepted 8 October 2014

Academic Editor: Jiang Du

Copyright © 2015 Camilla Calvieri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a useful noninvasive technique for determining the presence of microvascular obstruction (MVO) and intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH), frequently occurring in patients after reperfused myocardial infarction (MI). MVO, or the so-called no-reflow phenomenon, is associated with adverse ventricular remodeling and a poor prognosis during follow-up. Similarly, IMH is considered a severe damage after revascularization by percutaneous primary coronary intervention (PPCI) or fibrinolysis, which represents a worse prognosis. However, the pathophysiology of IMH is not fully understood and imaging modalities might help to better understand that phenomenon. While, during the past decade, several studies examined the distribution patterns of late gadolinium enhancement with different CMR sequences, the standardized CMR protocol for assessment of IMH is not yet well established. The aim of this review is to evaluate the available literature on this issue, with particular regard to CMR sequences. New techniques, such as positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI), could be useful tools to explore molecular mechanisms of the myocardial infarction healing process.

1. Introduction

“No Reflow” is a multifactorial phenomenon, also known as microvascular obstruction (MVO) ranging from 5% to 50%, occurring in patients having had a ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) or thrombolysis. The MVO phenomenon is associated with a greater myocardial injury [1]. It has been defined as a patency restoration of an epicardial infarct-related coronary artery without complete microvascular reperfusion [1]. It has been described as a multifactorial pathogenesis including distal embolization, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and individual predisposition of coronary microcirculation injury [2]. MVO is generally assessed after PPCI, with myocardial reperfusion indexes as thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and myocardial blush grade (MBG) in the cath-lab and the electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation resolution (STR) in the coronary care unit. However, it can be better quantified by noninvasive imaging techniques, as cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) [3]. Microvascular obstruction is associated with a worse prognosis at short and long time. In fact, it is a prognostic index of postinfarct adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling, LV dysfunction, and increased mortality [4]. Microvascular obstruction is currently detected as hypoenhancement within bright regions of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on delayed postcontrast sequences, which are T1-weighted inversion recovery sequences acquired with different times after intravenous administration of gadolinium (Figure 1). Reperfusion injury may also cause intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH) by erythrocytes extravasation through severely damaged endothelial walls [5]. IMH can be found in almost half of patients with successfully revascularized acute myocardial infarction (MI) and is associated with larger infarcts, presence of MVO, higher left ventricular volumes, lower ejection fraction, and the lack of improvement at follow-up. Therefore, it has been shown that the presence of IMH is associated with adverse LV remodeling and poor prognosis [6, 7].

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 1: Microvascular obstruction on EGE and LGE imaging. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance has been performed 5 days after PCI in a 54-year-old male patient with anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction. On T1 early gadolinium enhancement (EGE) images ((a), (b)), the persistent microvascular damage appears dark (so-called “dark zones”) (black arrows) within late gadolinium enhancement area, representing the myocardial MVO on septal and anterior wall. White asterisk is the massive thrombus inside the ventricle apex ((a), (b)). T1 LGE short axis images of the same patient ((c), (d)) show transmural late gadolinium enhancement on the anteroseptal wall and a dark zone within this area indicating MVO (red arrows).

IMH can be visualized by T2-weighted CMR sequences (Figure 2), because breakdown products of hemoglobin are paramagnetic and can influence magnetic properties of the tissue like the MR relaxation times (T1, T2, and ) [7, 8]. CMR is the only imaging modality able to exactly detect in vivo IMH.

(a)  

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 2: MVO and hemorrhagic areas in patient after reperfused anterolateral STEMI. ((a), (d)) In the anterolateral wall a large transmural hyperintense region and an hypointense core centrally located therein (white arrows) are present on the T2-short time inversion recovery (STIR) images in short axis and four chamber views showing edema on mid-apical anterolateral wall and an hypointense hemorrhagic area within the edema. ((b), (c)) Late gadolinium enhancement images show microvascular obstruction (black arrows), consistent with the hypointense area of haemorrhage, on mid-apical anterolateral wall.

Although IMH is present in a variable proportion of the patients after reperfused myocardial infarction and is closely related to infarct size, MVO and LV function, its prognostic significance still remains unclear.

Over the past decade, the rapid advances in noninvasive imaging techniques, such as myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and in particular cardiovascular magnetic resonance, have enabled physicians to detect and quantify regions of MVO. In this review, we reported the available data about CMR sequences used to assess MVO and especially IMH.

2. No-Reflow Assessment: Cardiac MRI Prospective

A large amount of clinical data showed that MVO, detected by CMR, can predict early adverse LV remodeling, worse ejection fraction, larger myocardial infarct size, and major acute cardiac events (MACEs), independently from myocardial infarction size (IS) [9, 10].

Imaging techniques can provide a direct quantification of MVO extension and explain the relationship between IS and MVO in determining adverse LV remodeling. It is not yet well established what is the most accurate tool to visualize and quantify microvascular damage.

The evaluation of the molecular and cellular mechanisms after MI, during the first hours of ischemia-reperfusion, requires different types of sequences. In fact, microvascular obstruction is detected with different time-dependent sequences: first pass perfusion (FPP), early gadolinium enhancement (EGE) (Figure 1), and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (Figure 1) [11]. Previous studies demonstrated that the presence of MVO, detected on FPP images, has a prognostic role in STEMI patients [6] and its prevalence is higher compared with MVO assessed on LGE images [12]. Cochet et al. found MVO on FPP in 46% and MVO with LGE in 28% of patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Thus, comparing Kaplan-Meier survival curves stratified by the presence of MVO on FPP and LGE sequences, they reported a strong relationship between MVO on LGE and MACEs ( < 0,001), suggesting its higher prognostic value in predicting cardiovascular events during follow-up [13].

Judd et al. conducted the first experimental study in 1995, in a reperfused canine infarct model, which showed correlation of CMR findings with pathology, by thioflavin-S staining [14]. The authors reported for the first time areas of no-reflow, the so-called “dark zones” characterized by hypoenhancement within bright regions of LGE. In humans, Lima et al. [15] described a well-defined time-intensity curve of different areas of enhancement occurring in human myocardial infarcts, based on the wash-in and wash-out kinetics of contrast agent.

Since 1998, as demonstrated by Wu et al. [9], MVO detected by delayed postcontrast CMR sequences became a strong predictor of adverse postinfarct LV remodeling. Then, this correlation was confirmed by studies of Hombach et al. [16] and Ørn et al. [17], which demonstrated that the presence of microvascular obstruction is associated with infarct size, transmural infarction, and increased volumes in both short term and long term follow-up, representing an index of severe myocardial damage and of adverse left ventricular remodeling. Recently, Hirsch et al. [18] compared no reflow on LGE images by CMR with early systolic retrograde flow on intracoronary flow measurements, showing a strong correlation between the two techniques. Angiographic blush indexes of myocardial reperfusion have been recently associated with the quantification of microvascular obstruction areas assessed by CMR [3].

Small studies demonstrated, using FFP sequences, a linear correlation between MVO areas detected by CMR and MBG severity assessed by PPCI [19, 20]. Several studies compared MVO (by either FFP or LGE sequences) with IS or transmural extent, showing conflicting results concerning their prognostic interest, with some reports favoring MVO and others favoring infarct size or transmurality as the best predictor of outcomes [9, 16, 21, 22]. Regarding this, it has recently been reported that the ratio between MVO and IS could be an index of irreversible damage, strongly influenced by time delays before PCI [23]. Nijveldt et al. [21] showed that late MVO is associated with increased wall thickness, regardless of the degree of infarct transmurality. Evidence strongly suggests that, in the acute setting, MVO might be more relevant than infarct size or transmural extent [22].

3. Intramyocardial Hemorrhage: An Enigma for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance?

IMH reflects severe reperfusion injury in acute myocardial infarction involving the structural and functional integrity of the microcirculation. Intramyocardial hemorrhage is frequently found in large reperfused myocardial infarctions and is strictly correlated to the presence of MVO (Figure 2) [12, 24]. Animal and human studies showed IMH prevalently within the infarct core of reperfused STEMI [24, 25]. In the prereperfusion era, intramyocardial hemorrhage was rarely seen on autopsy studies. Few studies in humans investigated the relationship of IMH with LV adverse remodeling and infarct size (Table 1). In the last decade, with the improvement of myocardial revascularization techniques, scientific attention to intramyocardial hemorrhage progressively increased. However, the clinical significance of IMH is still unclear, because of nonstandardized methods to detect IMH in vivo. Noninvasive techniques can provide further prognostic information and can evaluate the effect of preventive measures directed towards reducing reperfusion injury in the acute phase of MI. It is still unclear whether IMH could represent a marker of adverse LV remodeling beyond MI size, LV ejection fraction, and MVO.

Table 1

Study
Type of study

IMH (%)
Time after MI
MVO (mean %)
IMH assessment
Follow-up
End point

Kidambi A et al. [26]
(2013)
Prospective
39
35
2 days
56
T2-weighted and T2*
90 days
Infarct contractility

Kali et al. [27]
(2013)
Prospective
15
73
3 days

T2*
6 months
Scar tissue

Kali et al. [28]
(2013)
Prospective
/
14
3 days

T2 STIR and T2*
Unclear
Hemorrhage

Porto et al. [20]
(2007)
Prospective
52
23
4–7 days

T2 W
6 months
Infarct size myocardial salvage index MVO

Mather et al. [29]
(2011)
Prospective
48
25
2 days
63
T2 W and T2*
3 months
LVEF, LVES QRS myocardial salvage infarct size

Eitel et al. [30]
(2011)
Prospective
346
35
3 days
43
T2-weighted
6 months
MACE: death, reinfarction congestive heart failure

Bekkers et al. [4]
(2010)
Prospective
90
43
5 ± 2 days
54
T2-weighted
103 ± 11 days
LV remodeling

Beek et al. [7]
(2010)
Prospective
45
44
5.1 ± 2.1 days
60
T2-weighted
4 months
Ejection fraction

Ganame et al. [6]
(2009)
Prospective
98
25
1 week
64
T2-weighted
4 months
LV Adverse remodeling

Ochiai et al. [31]
(1999)
Prospective
39
33
5.7 days
66
T2*-weighted gradient-echo
1 month
LVEF infarct size

Asanuma et al. [32]
(1997)
Prospective
24
38
6 days
33
T2*-weighted gradient-echo
31 days
Wall motion score

As reported previously, IMH can be visualized by T2-weighted (T2W) sequences because hemorrhage and the breakdown products of oxygenated hemoglobin influence magnetic properties of the surrounding tissue [12]. T2W signal is high in the very early, hyperacute phase but then falls because of the paramagnetic effects of deoxyhemoglobin and intracellular methemoglobin, as demonstrated in cerebral hemorrhage [33]. Particularly in the core of the hematoma, where there is marked hypoxia, the signal may remain very low for a prolonged period of time [33, 34]. Instead, -weighted CMR technique is very sensitive to the paramagnetic effects of deoxyhemoglobin and methemoglobin, but it requires relatively long echo times that may degrade image quality during cardiac imaging [11]. Finally, the standardized imaging method or protocol for assessment of IMH is still debated.

Asanuma et al. [32] described in humans an incidence of 38% of intramyocardial hemorrhage in patients with reperfused AMI. They demonstrated, in patients presenting with anterior AMI, the presence of IMH using myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and -weighted CMR sequences. Patients with IMH, compared to patients without IMH, showed a lower improvement of wall motion score, assessed by contrast echocardiography, at day 31 after coronary reflow. Ochiai et al. with the same CMR sequences reported an incidence of 33% of IMH and a strong correlation with infarct size, with less improvement of ejection fraction, using thallium-201 scintigraphy [31], confirming previous observations. Recently, the role of -weighted sequences for detecting IMH was validated by histology in a study [35] which showed a strong correlation between hemorrhage sizes assessed in vivo with and assessed ex vivo by triphenyl-tetrazoliumchloride (TTC).

So far, the majority of studies, all prospective, used T2-weighted sequences to identify IMH, suggesting different points of view about its prognostic role.

Ganame et al. showed, in a multivariate analysis, that intramyocardial hemorrhage detected on T2-weighted images is an independent predictor of adverse LV remodeling at 4 months, regardless of infarct size [6]. Only two small studies [4, 7] did not show prognostic significance of hypointense cores beyond late MVO in prediction of functional changes at follow-up. The largest prospective study was conducted by Eitel and colleagues, which examined 346 STEMI patients. The authors demonstrated that the presence of IMH as a hypointense core in T2 weighted images in 35% of patients was associated with larger infarcts, greater amounts of microvascular obstruction, less myocardial salvage, and impaired left ventricular function. Of note, IMH, together with late MVO, was indicated as a strong predictor of MACEs at 6 months after MI [30]. For the first time the prognostic clinical relevance of the hypointense infarct cores in STEMI patients after reperfusion with PPCI has been demonstrated.

Other studies investigated the presence of IMH with T2-weighted and sequences suggesting a better definition of IMH with combined use of these two techniques.

Mather et al. [29] described an association between the presence of IMH, as a hypointense signal within the area at risk (AAR) on both T2W and images, and prolonged QRS duration, a marker of arrhythmic risk. Both were markers of adverse remodeling.

Recently, Kali et al. [28] compared the two types of sequences in humans and in dogs suggesting a superiority of for characterization of acute reperfusion myocardial hemorrhage. Moreover, using sequences, an iron deposit has been observed, measured by mass spectrometry within the areas of hemorrhagic infarction. This probably represents a prolonged inflammatory burden during the chronic phase of MI [27].

Previous studies [27–30, 35] identified intramyocardial hemorrhage as a hypointense signal or “negative contrast,” within a region of hyperintensity, by exploiting the T2 and shortening effects caused by the elevated myocardial densities of paramagnetic hemoglobin degradation products (deoxyhemoglobin, methemoglobin) or blood degradation products (ferritin and hemosiderin).

Pedersen et al. demonstrated for the first time a higher diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of T1-weighted inversion recovery sequences (T1WIR), compared to T2 short tau inversion recovery sequences (T2-STIR) and to -weighted sequences. They were able to detect the presence of hemorrhage in porcine myocardium exposed to ischemia-reperfusion injury [36]. Moreover, a superior agreement of T1WIR sequences with pathology has been reported. Of note, this study showed that the combination of T1W and T2-STIR allows a better differentiation between MVO with and without IMH, by exploiting the T1 shortening effect of methemoglobin [36]. In fact, T1WIR sequences, depicting IMH as an area of hyperintense signal and normal myocardium as hypointense signal intensity, provide a superior image contrast.

Recently, Kandler et al., using mapping, found MVO on LGE images in 66% and IMH in 50% of patients after reperfused STEMI, which occurred in the majority of cases concomitantly with MVO [37] in the center of large MVO areas. These findings confirmed the strong interplay between occurrence of IMH and MVO [4] and the prevalence of IMH described in other studies [7]. Moreover, they compared patients with MVO and presence of IMH with ones without IMH, reporting a significantly lower EF, larger LV volumes (both systolic and diastolic), and larger infarct sizes in patients with IMH. In addition, concerning predictors of IMH presence, they revealed at multivariate analysis that MVO on LGE images and a “hypointense core” on T2 weighted images stated a high risk for the occurrence of IMH. Of note, this study demonstrated that defects in were also present in T2 imaging but not vice versa, suggesting that sequences are more accurate for IMH detection than T2 ones, probably for the signal intensity changes in the earlier stage of infarction. However, the optimal CMR sequences to assess IMH are still being debated.

4. Emerging Techniques: From Morphology to Function in Myocardial Infarction

Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) offers the potential for a powerful “one-stop shop” combination of structural, functional, and molecular imaging technology that may be superior to that of MRI imaging alone. PET has been considered a gold standard for clinical evaluation of myocardial viability [27, 36] in chronic ischemic heart disease, because the metabolic tracer [18F]-deoxyglucose (FDG) can distinguish ischemically compromised but viable “hibernating myocardium” [38]. The healing of myocardial infarction is a complex inflammatory process, resolved over time, which involves different cell types like monocytes and macrophages [39].

Simultaneous PET/MRI is an emerging technique combining two powerful imaging modalities [40]. In fact, PET/MRI is very attractive because it combines the high spatial resolution of contrast of magnetic resonance imaging in absence of ionizing radiation, with the high sensitivity of positron emission tomography (PET).

In fact, using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/MRI system, Lee et al. [41] examined myocardial inflammation postinfarction in mice with coronary ligation. They demonstrated a high 18F-FDG uptake on day 5 after myocardial infarction and that the number of monocytes/macrophages in the noninfarcted myocardium was lower than in the ischemic tissue.

Of note, also Fluorine 19 (19F) MRI has attracted much interest because of its capacity of cell tracking in vivo, useful to understand the molecular mechanism underlying reperfused myocardium [42].

Flogel et al. validated this emerging technique, in a murine model of acute cardiac and cerebral ischemia [43]. They used PFCs, nanoemulsion of perfluorocarbons, as a “positive” contrast agent, to detect inflammation in the border zones of infarction. Moreover, they confirmed with histology a colocalization of rhodamine-labeled PFCs with circulating monocytes/macrophages.

Recently, 9F/1H MRI has been used to visualize spatiotemporal recruitment of monocytes in reperfused MI in animals [42]. More interestingly, Ye et al. correlated monocyte infiltration with the presence of IMH and MVO, indicating a greater monocyte infiltration in MI areas with severe ischemia-reperfusion injury, assessed with IMH [40]. In fact, monocyte/macrophage infiltration was significantly impaired in MVO areas defined by MRI, compared to animals with IMH but no MVO [42]. This situation was associated with a worse LV functional outcome compared to MI isolated with IMH. Post-MI functional outcome is determined not only by MI size but also by the rate and quality of infarct healing. Myocardial infarction healing process causes changes in architecture and tissue properties; the principal cell effectors are monocytes which remove cell debris from granulation tissue and promote angiogenesis. In this regard, 19F/1H MRI can be clinically translatable into an innovative noninvasive approach to identify target patients. Moreover, this technique could be used to monitor medical therapies to optimize MI healing process.

In the future, this new technique may be more useful than cardiac MRI alone to detect labeled cells in reperfused MI areas, because the iron oxide nanoparticles recognition with cardiac MRI can be disturbed by magnetic susceptibility () effects on gradient echo magnetic resonance (MR) images. Therefore, it would be also useful to better detect IMH in vivo. Future research to evaluate the most appropriate clinical application of PET/MRI considering diagnostic performance, technical feasibility, practicality, and cost/benefit ratio compared to established diagnostic techniques will therefore be required before PET/MRI routine use.

5. Conclusions

IMH is a frequent finding in reperfused STEMI and it is often associated with reduced ventricular function and myocardial damage. In fact, it is a prognostic index of MACEs during follow-up, so it could be useful for a better risk stratification of patients with STEMI. IMH can be evaluated only by CMR, but there is still a debate about the optimal CMR sequences to detect it. Further research and maybe other imaging techniques, such as PET/MRI, could be necessary to resolve this open issue.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

S. H. Rezkalla and R. A. Kloner, “Coronary no-reflow phenomenon: from the experimental laboratory to the cardiac catheterization laboratory,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 950–957, 2008.

G. Niccoli, F. Burzotta, L. Galiuto, and F. Crea, “Myocardial no-reflow in humans,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 281–292, 2009.

G. Niccoli, N. Cosentino, C. Spaziani, F. Fracassi, G. Tarantini, and F. Crea, “No-reflow: incidence and detection in the cath-lab,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 19, no. 25, pp. 4564–4575, 2013.

S. C. A. M. Bekkers, M. W. Smulders, V. L. Passos et al., “Clinical implications of microvascular obstruction and intramyocardial haemorrhage in acute myocardial infarction using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging,” European Radiology, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 2572–2578, 2010.

C. S. Lotan, A. Bouchard, G. B. Cranney, S. P. Bishop, and G. M. Pohost, “Assessment of post reperfusion myocardial hemorrhage using proton NMR imaging at 1.5 T,” Circulation, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 1018–1025, 1992.

J. Ganame, G. Messalli, S. Dymarkowski et al., “Impact of myocardial haemorrhage on left ventricular function and remodelling in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction,” European Heart Journal, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1440–1449, 2009.

A. M. Beek, R. Nijveldt, and A. C. Van Rossum, “Intramyocardial hemorrhage and microvascular obstruction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention,” International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2010.

S. F. Pedersen, S. A. Thrysøe, M. P. Robich et al., “Assessment of intramyocardial hemorrhage by T1-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance in reperfused acute myocardial infarction,” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, vol. 14, no. 1, article 59, 2012.

K. C. Wu, E. A. Zerhouni, R. M. Judd et al., “Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction,” Circulation, vol. 97, no. 8, pp. 765–772, 1998.

S. de Waha, S. Desch, I. Eitel et al., “Relationship and prognostic value of microvascular obstruction and infarct size in ST-elevation myocardial infarction as visualized by magnetic resonance imaging,” Clinical Research in Cardiology, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 487–495, 2012.

S. K. White, D. J. Hausenloy, and J. C. Moon, “Imaging the myocardial microcirculation post-myocardial infarction,” Current Heart Failure Reports, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 282–292, 2012.

A. T. Yan, C. M. Gibson, E. Larose et al., “Characterization of microvascular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement imaging,” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 831–837, 2006.

A. Cochet, A. Lalande, L. Lorgis et al., “Prognostic value of microvascular damage determined by cardiac magnetic resonance in non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: comparison between first-pass and late gadolinium-enhanced images,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 725–732, 2010.

R. M. Judd, C. H. Lugo-Olivieri, M. Arai et al., “Physiological basis of myocardial contrast enhancement in fast magnetic resonance images of 2-day-old reperfused canine infarcts,” Circulation, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 1902–1910, 1995.

J. A. Lima, R. M. Judd, A. Bazille, S. P. Schulman, E. Atalar, and E. A. Zerhouni, “Regional heterogeneity of human myocardial infarcts demonstrated by contrast-enhanced MRI: potential mechanisms,” Circulation, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1117–1125, 1995.

V. Hombach, O. Grebe, N. Merkle et al., “Sequelae of acute myocardial infarction regarding cardiac structure and function and their prognostic significance as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging,” European Heart Journal, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 549–557, 2005.

S. Ørn, C. Manhenke, O. J. Greve et al., “Microvascular obstruction is a major determinant of infarct healing and subsequent left ventricular remodelling following primary percutaneous coronary intervention,” European Heart Journal, vol. 30, no. 16, pp. 1978–1985, 2009.

A. Hirsch, R. Nijveldt, J. D. E. Haeck et al., “Relation between the assessment of microvascular injury by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and coronary Doppler flow velocity measurements in patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 51, no. 23, pp. 2230–2238, 2008.

E. Appelbaum, A. J. Kirtane, A. Clark et al., “Association of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade and ST-segment resolution with cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of microvascular obstruction and infarct size following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction,” Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 123–129, 2009.

I. Porto, F. Burzotta, M. Brancati et al., “Relation of myocardial blush grade to microvascular perfusion and myocardial infarct size after primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 99, no. 12, pp. 1671–1673, 2007.

R. Nijveldt, A. M. Beek, A. Hirsch et al., “Functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction: comparison between angiography, electrocardiography, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of microvascular injury,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 181–189, 2008.

G. Tarantini, R. Razzolini, L. Cacciavillani et al., “Influence of transmurality, infarct size, and severe microvascular obstruction on left ventricular remodeling and function after primary coronary angioplasty,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 98, no. 8, pp. 1033–1040, 2006.

F. Adamo, C. B. Ducci, M. Mancone et al., “Extra-Hospital delays correlate more strongly with myocardial damage in stemi, evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance,” Circulation, vol. 128, supplement 22, abstract 14922, 2013.

D. Garcia-Dorado, P. Théroux, J. Solares et al., “Determinants of hemorrhagic infarcts: histologic observations from experiments involving coronary occlusion, coronary reperfusion, and reocclusion,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 301–311, 1990.

H. Fujiwara, T. Onodera, M. Tanaka et al., “A clinicopathologic study of patients with hemorrhagic myocardial infarction treated with selective coronary thrombolysis with urokinase,” Circulation, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 749–757, 1986.

A. Kidambi, A. N. Mather, M. Motwani et al., “The effect of microvascular obstruction and intramyocardial hemorrhage on contractile recovery in reperfused myocardial infarction: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance,” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, vol. 15, no. 1, article 58, 2013.

A. Kali, A. Kumar, I. Cokic et al., “Chronic manifestation of postreperfusion intramyocardial hemorrhage as regional iron deposition: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study with ex vivo validation,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 218–228, 2013.

A. Kali, R. L. Q. Tang, A. Kumar, J. K. Min, and R. Dharmakumar, “Detection of acute reperfusion myocardial hemorrhage with cardiac MR imaging: T2 versus T2,” Radiology, vol. 269, no. 2, pp. 387–395, 2013.

A. N. Mather, T. A. Fairbairn, S. G. Ball, J. P. Greenwood, and S. Plein, “Reperfusion haemorrhage as determined by cardiovascular MRI is a predictor of adverse left ventricular remodelling and markers of late arrhythmic risk,” Heart, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 453–459, 2011.

I. Eitel, K. Kubusch, O. Strohm et al., “Prognostic value and determinants of a hypointense infarct core in T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance in acute reperfused ST-elevation- myocardial infarction,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 354–362, 2011.

K. Ochiai, T. Shimada, Y. Murakami et al., “Hemorrhagic myocardial infarction after coronary reperfusion detected in vivo by magnetic resonance imaging in humans: prevalence and clinical implications,” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 247–256, 1999.

T. Asanuma, K. Tanabe, K. Ochiai et al., “Relationship between progressive microvascular damage and intramyocardial hemorrhage in patients with reperfused anterior myocardial infarction: myocardial contrast echocardiographic study,” Circulation, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 448–453, 1997.

W. G. Bradley Jr., “MR appearance of hemorrhage in the brain,” Radiology, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 15–26, 1993.

P. M. Parizel, S. Makkat, E. van Miert, J. W. van Goethem, L. Van den Hauwe, and A. M. De Schepper, “Intracranial hemorrhage: principles of CT and MRI interpretation,” European Radiology, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1770–1783, 2001.

A. Kumar, J. D. Green, J. M. Sykes et al., “Detection and quantification of myocardial reperfusion hemorrhage Using T2∗-weighted CMR,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1274–1283, 2011.

S. F. Pedersen, S. A. Thrysøe, M. P. Robich et al., “Assessment of intramyocardial hemorrhage by T1-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance in reperfused acute myocardial infarction,” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, vol. 14, no. 1, article 59, 2012.

D. Kandler, C. Lücke, M. Grothoff et al., “The relation between hypointense core, microvascular obstruction and intramyocardial haemorrhage in acute reperfused myocardial infarction assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging,” European Radiology, 2014.

J. Machac, S. L. Bacharach, T. M. Bateman et al., “Positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion and glucose metabolism imaging,” Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. e121–e151, 2006.

J. Knuuti, H. R. Schelbert, and J. J. Bax, “The need for standardisation of cardiac FDG PET imaging in the evaluation of myocardial viability in patients with chronic ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1257–1266, 2002.

Y.-X. Ye, T. C. Basse-Lüsebrink, P.-A. Arias-Loza et al., “Monitoring of monocyte recruitment in reperfused myocardial infarction with intramyocardial hemorrhage and microvascular obstruction by combined fluorine 19 and proton cardiac magnetic resonance imaging,” Circulation, vol. 128, no. 17, pp. 1878–1888, 2013.

W. W. Lee, B. Marinelli, A. M. van der Laan et al., “PET/MRI of inflammation in myocardial infarction,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 153–163, 2012.

C. Nappi and G. El Fakhri, “State of the art in cardiac hybrid technology: PET/MR,” Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 338–345, 2013.

U. Flogel, Z. Ding, H. Hardung et al., “In vivo monitoring of inflammation after cardiac and cerebral ischemia by fluorine magnetic resonance imaging,” Circulation, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 140–148, 2008.