BioMed Research International
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 1750752, 1 page
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1750752

Erratum

Erratum to “Need for Scientific Rigor in the Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Alternative Procedures”

Johnny Padulo1,2 and Luca Paolo Ardigò³

¹eCampus University, Via Isimbardi, No. 10, 22060 Novedrate, Italy
²Tunisian Research Laboratory “Sports Performance Optimization”, National Center of Medicine and Science in Sport, 263 Tunis, Tunisia
³School of Exercise and Sport Science, Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Via Felice Casorati, No. 43, 37131 Verona, Italy

Received 6 December 2015; Accepted 27 December 2015

Copyright © 2016 Johnny Padulo and Luca Paolo Ardigò. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

In the paper titled “Need for Scientific Rigor in the Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Alternative Procedures” [1] the title was wrong.

The right title should say “Comment on ‘One-Year Follow-Up of a Series of 100 Patients Treated for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis by Means of Helifix Interspinous Process Decompression Device.’”

References

J. Padulo and L. P. Ardigò, “Need for scientific rigor in the evaluation of minimally invasive alternative procedures,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 876496, 2 pages, 2015.