BioMed Research International
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 9170167, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9170167

Research Article

First Report of Bovine Leukemia Virus Infection in Yaks (Bos mutus) in China

Jian-Gang Ma,1,2 Wen-Bin Zheng,1,2 Dong-Hui Zhou,² Si-Yuan Qin,³ Ming-Yang Yin,² Xing-Quan Zhu,² and Gui-Xue Hu¹

¹College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin 130118, China
²State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730046, China
³General Station for Surveillance of Wildlife Diseases & Wildlife Borne Diseases, State Forestry Administration (SFA), Shenyang 110034, China

Received 28 February 2016; Revised 7 May 2016; Accepted 16 May 2016

Academic Editor: Leon Spicer

Copyright © 2016 Jian-Gang Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL) is a chronic lymphosarcoma disease of cattle caused by bovine leukemia virus (BLV). No information is available concerning the epidemiology of BLV infection in yaks (Bos mutus). One thousand five hundred and eighty-four serum samples from 610 black yaks and 974 white yaks from Gansu province, northwest China, were collected between April 2013 and March 2014 and tested for BLV antibodies using a commercially available ELISA kit. The overall BLV seroprevalence in yaks was 21.09% (334/1584), with 24.26% (148/610) black yaks and 19.10% (186/974) white yaks yielding positive results. Risk factor analysis indicated that with the exception of breed (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.06–1.73, ), the age, region, gender, farm, and the numbers of pregnancies were not considered as risk factors for the presence of BLV in yaks included in this study. This is the first report of BLV infection in yaks in China, which provides information for controlling BLV infection in yaks.

1. Introduction

Enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL) is a chronic lymphosarcoma disease of cattle caused by bovine leukemia virus (BLV), a member of the genus Deltaretrovirus in the family Retroviridae [1]. Transmission of BLV can occur through two routes: horizontal transmission (e.g., iatrogenic) and vertical transmission [2, 3]. BLV infections may present as aleukemic (asymptomatic animals), persistent lymphocytosis (with hematological abnormalities), and lymphosarcoma (tumors), and most infections are subclinical. Approximately 30% of BLV infected cattle have persistent lymphocytosis, and malignant lymphosarcoma occurs in less than 5% of infected animals [4, 5].

EBL can cause major economic losses to the cattle industry worldwide; it is listed by World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) as a disease of importance to international trade [6]. Many countries have investigated and reported the disease in cattle in recent years [7, 8], and the data have supported the prevention and control of EBL to reduce economic losses. However, only one study has reported the seroprevalence of BLV in cattle in northern and northeastern China [9].

Yaks are a unique bovine species and the precious semiwild animal species which lives at high altitudes. Most of them are distributed in the territory of China, especially the white yaks, which only live in the Tianzhu Tibetan Autonomous County (TTAC), Gansu province, northwest China. However, there was no information on the seroprevalence of BLV infection in yaks in China. Therefore, for the first time we surveyed the BLV seroprevalence in yaks in Gansu province, northwest China, and evaluated the risk factors that influenced BLV seroprevalence.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Serum samples were collected from black and white yaks in various regions in Gansu province (32°31′′–42°57′′N, 92°13′′–108°46′′E), northwest China. These regions have a plateau continental climate, and the average annual temperatures vary between −8°C and 4°C.

2.2. Sample Collection

Blood samples were collected between April 2013 and March 2014. A total of 974 blood samples were collected from white yaks randomly from several farms in TTAC, Gansu province, northwest China. A total of 610 blood samples were collected from black yaks randomly from several farms in Luqu and Maqu counties, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Gansu province, northwest China. All the blood samples were transported directly to the laboratory. Serum was obtained through centrifugation at 1000 ×g for 5 min. The serum was separated and stored at −20°C until analysis. Detailed information regarding breed, geographic origin, season, number of pregnancies, gender, age, and farm were recorded and listed in Tables 1 and 3.

Table 1: Seroprevalence of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection in yaks in Gansu province, northwestern China, by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Factor
Category
No. tested
No. positive
Prevalence (%)

Gender
Male
471
112
23.78

Female
1113
222
19.95

Age (years)
0 < years ≤ 1
286
57
19.93

1 < years ≤ 3
594
123
20.71

3 < years ≤ 5
355
89
25.07

5 < years
349
65
18.63

Pregnancy
≤2
854
171
20.02

3–5
189
38
20.11

≥6
70
13
18.57

Season
Spring
428
99
23.13

Summer
354
70
19.77

Autumn
467
105
22.48

Winter
335
60
17.91

Species
White yaks
974
186
19.10

Black yaks
610
148
24.26

Region
Tianzhu
974
186
19.10

Luqu
146
33
22.60

Maqu
464
115
24.78

Total

1584
334
21.09

2.3. Serological Assay

Serum samples were examined for antibodies against BLV using a commercially available ELISA kit (Pourquier, Montpellier, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions [10]. Positive and negative controls were provided with the kit. The optical density of color development was read by a photometer at 450 nm, and the titer of antibodies in the sera was determined following the manufacturer’s recommendations [10].

2.4. Data Analysis

Seropositive yaks were analyzed in relation to gender, age, number of pregnancies, season, breed, and region. Exploratory analysis was performed to determine variables potentially associated with exposure to BLV. These factors were studied in a multivariable logistic regression model, and if the () value was <0.05, it was considered a risk factor for BLV infection. The statistical program PASW Statistics 19.0 (SPSS Inc., IBM Corporation, Somers, NY) was used to perform the statistical analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

It was demonstrated that 334 (21.1%) out of 1584 serum samples were BLV seropositive, with 24.26% in black yaks and 19.10% in white yaks (Table 1). The BLV seropositive yaks were found in all herds. BLV seroprevalence ranged from 18.63% to 25.1% in different age groups of yaks. The highest and lowest rates were recorded in the 3 < years < 5 and 5 < years old groups, respectively (Table 1). Male yaks had a higher seroprevalence (23.78%) compared to females (19.95%) (Table 1). Among yaks sampled in different seasons, the seroprevalence varied from 17.91% to 23.13% (Table 1). Among yaks from different regions, BLV seroprevalence ranged from 19.10% to 24.78% (Table 1). In addition, BLV seroprevalence in female yaks of different pregnancy status ranged from 18.57% to 20.11% (Table 1). Among the different farms, BLV seroprevalence varied from 16.00% to 28.16% (Table 3).

According to conditional forward stepwise logistic regression, it was found that gender, age, region, farm, and number of pregnancies of yaks were not significant risk factors for BLV (). The breed of yaks was considered to be a risk factor that influences the BLV seroprevalence in yaks () (Table 2).

Table 2: Odds ratios for specie as risk factor for bovine leukemia virus (BLV) seroprevalence in yaks ().

Factor
Group
Prevalence (%)
OR
95% CI
value

Specie
White yaks
19.10
Reference

Black yaks
24.27
1.36
1.06–1.73
0.014

Table 3: Seroprevalence of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection in yaks in different farms in Gansu province, northwestern China.

Region
Farm
No. tested
No. positive
Prevalence (%)

Tianzhu
1
220
51
23.18

2
273
51
18.68

3
231
44
19.05

4
250
40
16.00

Maqu
5
81
19
23.46

6
147
35
23.81

7
103
29
28.16

8
133
32
24.06

Luqu
9
60
15
25.00

10
34
8
23.53

11
52
10
19.23

Total

1584
334
21.09

In this study, the overall BLV seroprevalence in yaks was 21.09%, which was slightly lower than that reported in dairy cattle (25.4%) in Iran [8] but higher than that in breeding beef (16.3%) in Japan [11]. The BLV seroprevalence in yaks in this study was much higher than previous reports [12, 13]. On the other hand, BLV seroprevalence in this study was much lower than the seroprevalence in cattle in Japan (28.6%) [11], in Ontario in Canada (29.4%) [14], and in Syria (69.2%) [15]. Many factors may be contributable to such differences, such as the climatic conditions, geographical conditions, species and farm management, and the sensitivity of the detection techniques used.

Once an animal is infected with BLV, it will remain infected for life. The prevalence determined for the different seasons therefore cannot be considered as a possible risk factor, although the BLV seroprevalence varied from 17.91% to 23.13% in different season groups, with slight differences among different seasons, and slightly higher seroprevalences were found in yaks sampled in spring (23.12%) and autumn (22.48%) (Table 1). This result was in line with the characteristic of BLV that BLV is a persistent infection.

Moreover, BLV seroprevalences in yaks of different age groups were slightly different, but the difference was not statistically significant (). The seroprevalence increased gradually from 19.93% in years ≤ 1 age group to 25.07% in 3 < years ≤ 5 age group, and the highest seroprevalence was the 3 < years ≤ 5 age group. These results are similar to that of a recent study [16]. These differences may be due to the fact that BLV incubation period is 3-4 years on average. Furthermore, BLV seroprevalences in yaks of different farm groups ranged from 16.00% to 28.16%. In general, the seroprevalence in farms of TTAC was slightly lower than in Maqu and Luqu counties. But it was not a significant risk factor for BLV (). These slight differences could be because TTAC is located near Lanzhou, the capital of Gansu province, and the yak farms are better managed than that in Maqu and Luqu counties.

This study showed that the breed of yaks was the only risk factor associated with BLV seroprevalence. Logistic regression analysis showed that the black yaks had a 1.36 times higher risk of being infected than the white yaks (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.06–1.73). There could be a few explanations for this difference. First, white yaks and black yaks are different yak breeds, and they may have different susceptibility to infection with BLV due to their genetic difference. Second, white yaks get better animal welfare and are better managed because white yak is a unique and precious yak breed, only lives in TTAC, Gansu Province, Northwest China, and total number is only about 50000. They may have better resistance to infection with BLV than that of black yaks.

This is the first report of BLV seroprevalence in yaks in China. This study extended the host range for BLV. Moreover, the findings of the present study provided base-line information for the timely execution of strategies and measures to control BLV infection in yaks and to assess resulting effects.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the “Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest” (Grant no. 201303037) and the Beef and Yak Production System Programme, MOA (CARS-38).

References

S. J. Kenyon and C. E. Piper, “Cellular basis of persistent lymphocytosis in cattle infected with bovine leukemia virus,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 891–897, 1977.

I. Schwartz and D. Lévy, “Pathobiology of bovine leukemia virus,” Veterinary Research, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 521–536, 1994.

G. Gutiérrez, I. Alvarez, R. Politzki et al., “Natural progression of bovine leukemia virus infection in Argentinean dairy cattle,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 151, no. 3-4, pp. 255–263, 2011.

A. Burny, Y. Cleuter, R. Kettmann et al., “Bovine leukaemia: facts and hypotheses derived from the study of an infectious cancer,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 197–218, 1988.

S. M. Rodríguez, A. Florins, N. Gillet et al., “Preventive and therapeutic strategies for bovine leukemia virus: lessons for HTLV,” Viruses, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1210–1248, 2011.

OIE, “Enzootic bovine leukosis,” in Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, pp. 729–738, OIE, Paris, France, 6th edition, 2008.

O. Nekouei, J. VanLeeuwen, J. Sanchez, D. Kelton, A. Tiwari, and G. Keefe, “Herd-level risk factors for infection with bovine leukemia virus in Canadian dairy herds,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 119, no. 3-4, pp. 105–113, 2015.

S. Mousavi, A. Haghparast, G. Mohammadi, and S. E. Tabatabaeizadeh, “Prevalence of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection in the northeast of Iran,” Veterinary Research Forum, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 135–139, 2014.

W.-W. Sun, W.-F. Lv, W. Cong et al., “Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis and bovine leukemia virus seroprevalence and associated risk factors in commercial dairy and beef cattle in Northern and Northeastern China,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 315173, 7 pages, 2015.

H. Morovati, E. Shirvani, V. Noaman et al., “Seroprevalence of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection in dairy cattle in Isfahan Province, Iran,” Tropical Animal Health and Production, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1127–1129, 2012.

K. Murakami, S. Kobayashi, M. Konishi, K.-I. Kameyama, T. Yamamoto, and T. Tsutsui, “The recent prevalence of Bovine Leukemia Virus (BLV) infection among Japanese cattle,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 84–88, 2011.

S. D. Morris, J. G. Myburgh, M. van Vuuren, and F. van der Vyver, “Serological survey to determine the prevalence of bovine leukaemia virus antibodies in dairy cattle on selected farms in the Gauteng and Mpumalanga Provinces,” Journal of the South African Veterinary Association, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 146–147, 1996.

M. Şevik, O. Avcı, and Ö. B. İnce, “An 8-year longitudinal sero-epidemiological study of bovine leukaemia virus (BLV) infection in dairy cattle in Turkey and analysis of risk factors associated with BLV seropositivity,” Tropical Animal Health and Production, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 715–720, 2015.

R. B. Walsh, D. F. Kelton, S. K. Hietala, and T. F. Duffield, “Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays performed on milk and serum samples for detection of neosporosis and leukosis in lactating dairy cows,” The Canadian Veterinary Journal, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 347–352, 2013.

A. Kurdi, P. Blankenstein, O. Marquardt, and D. Ebner, “Serologic and virologic investigations on the presence of BLV infection in a dairy herd in Syria,” Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 18–23, 1999.

T. Watanabe, E. Inoue, H. Mori, Y. Osawa, and K. Okazaki, “Delayed-onset enzootic bovine leukosis possibly caused by superinfection with bovine leukemia virus mutated in the pol gene,” Archives of Virology, vol. 160, no. 8, pp. 2087–2091, 2015.