Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 2340389, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2340389

Research Article

Clinical and Prognostic Value of PET/CT Imaging with Combination of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Panpan Zhang,¹ Jiangyuan Yu,² Jie Li,¹ Lin Shen,¹ Nan Li,² Hua Zhu,² Shizhen Zhai,² Yan Zhang,² Zhi Yang,² and Ming Lu¹

¹Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
²Department of Nuclear Medicine, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Zhi Yang; pekyz@163.com and Ming Lu; qiminglu_mail@126.com

Received 25 July 2017; Revised 22 October 2017; Accepted 16 January 2018; Published 26 February 2018

Academic Editor: Chongzhao Ran

Copyright © 2018 Panpan Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Background. To evaluate the clinical and prognostic value of PET/CT with combination of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). Method. 83 patients of GEP-NENs who underwent ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were enrolled between June 2013 and December 2016. Well-differentiated (WD) NETs are divided into group A (Ki-67 < 10%) and group B (Ki-67 ≥ 10%), and poorly differentiated (PD) NECs are defined as group C. The relationship between PET/CT results and clinicopathological characteristics was retrospectively investigated. Result. For groups A/B/C, the sensitivities of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG were 78.8%/83.3%/37.5% and 52.0%/72.2%/100.0%. A negative correlation between Ki-67 and of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE ( = −0.415; ≤ 0.001) was observed, while a positive correlation was noted between Ki-67 and of ¹⁸F-FDG ( = 0.683; ≤ 0.001). 62.5% (5/8) of patients showed significantly more lesions in the bone if ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE was used, and 22.7% (5/22) of patients showed more lymph node metastases if ¹⁸F-FDG was used. Conclusions. The sensitivity of dual tracers was correlated with cell differentiation, and a correlation between Ki-67 and both of PET-CTs could be observed. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE is suggested for WD-NET and ¹⁸F-FDG is probably suitable for patients with Ki-67 ≥ 10%.

1. Introduction

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that arise from cells of the endocrine system [1]. GEP-NENs are rare and present many clinical challenges. Because of their unpredictable biologic behaviors, the diagnosis usually takes place only after the condition has become advanced. Treatment regimens rely mainly on histological grading via biopsy; however, tumor heterogeneity cannot be fully assessed by tumor biopsy [2, 3]. Although Ki-67 staining has been shown to have prognostic significance in GEP-NENs, pitfalls may lead clinicians to misjudge the tumor grades. Specifically, first, the current gold-standard method, in which 2000 cells are counted, is heavily dependent on the skill and expertise of the reporting pathologist [4]. Second, the limited tissue in some cases may impede accurate assessment of Ki-67 given the potential for heterogeneity of Ki-67 expression within tumors. Finally, the Ki-67 index may vary over time in the same patient, with changes possible both in response to treatment [5] and over the progression of the disease [6]. We believe that combined dual-tracer PET/CT imaging offers distinct advantages to overcome the above pitfalls.

DOTA-peptides specifically bind to somatostatin receptors 2, 3, and 5 and are usually overexpressed on the surfaces neuroendocrine cells [7, 8]. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE has been shown to be useful for staging, restaging, surveillance, determining SSTR-based therapy, and monitoring responses to treatments in NENs [9, 10]. ¹⁸F-FDG is a glucose analogue, and PET/CT imaging with this tracer has been shown to be correlated with NENs aggressiveness. The presence of increased glucose in NENs highlights an increased propensity for invasion and metastasis, and PET imaging with ¹⁸F-FDG accordingly has higher sensitivity, especially in aggressive and high-grade tumors [11, 12]. Therefore, we believe that PET/CT imaging with combination of  ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is a highly efficient whole-body imaging method, and it could be complementary to conventional imaging methods.

A large number of previous studies have evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of both tracers in the presence of a relative shortage of information, regarding the correlation to pathological findings and prognostic value. Only a few studies have compared the clinical impact of both ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG PET tracers on NENs [13, 14]. The present study aimed to determine the clinical value of the complementary PET/CT imaging method in a large histologically proven NENs population.

2. Materials and Methods

We analyzed the data from 83 (50 males and 33 females) consecutive patients with pathologically proven NENs who underwent contemporaneous PET/CT imaging with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG between June 2013 and December 2016. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed within an interval of no more than 2 weeks. No patients were treated during this interval. All NENs were classified according to the histopathological reports, which are based on recent consensus statements of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. According to the grade of differentiation, proliferation index (Ki-67), and mitotic count, the well-differentiated (WD) neoplasms are herein defined as NET and graded G1 (Ki-67 ≤ 2%) or G2 (Ki-67 3–20%) and G3a (Ki-67 > 20%); the poorly differentiated (PD) neoplasms are defined as NEC and G3b. G2 patients were further divided into 2 groups as G2a (3–9%) and G2b (10–20%).

2.1. PET/CT Acquisition

Patients fasted for at least 6 h before PET/CT scan. Images were acquired 1 h after injection of 3.7 MBq/kg ¹⁸F-FDG or 1 h after the injection of 100–200 MBq ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE. Whole-body scan (brain to mid-thigh) was performed with the patient in the supine position. CT exposure factors for all scans were 120 kV and 100 mA. PET/CT images were reported in consensus by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians who were blinded to the findings of the structural imaging. Any nonphysiological focus of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE or ¹⁸F-FDG uptake greater than the normal liver background was considered positive. At the same time, CT imaging was used to differentiate between lesions and physiological uptake. The maximum standardized uptake value () of primary and metastatic lesions was calculated. generated from each patient was used in the final analysis. The SUV ratio of the tumor relative to the maximal liver uptake was calculated by dividing of the tumor by of the liver (). The ratio between of  ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and that of ¹⁸F-FDG ( ratio) was also calculated.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive analyses are presented using mean and SD for normally distributed variables, but median, minimum, and maximum values were used for those that were nonnormally distributed. Analyses were performed using SPSS (version 21.0; IBM). The paired Student’s -test was used for the related nonnormally distributed variables. Correlation of values of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG with Ki-67 index was assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the last day of follow-up or death. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to assess the prognostic value regarding OS, and differences between groups were analyzed using the log-rank test. was considered as statistical significance.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

A total of 83 (50 males and 33 females) patients were included in the study, with a median age of 56 years (range: 27–77 years). The primary tumors were located in the pancreas in 27 patients (32.5%), gastrointestinal tract in 43 patients (51.8%), and unknown locations in 13 patients (15.7%). Among the subjects, 48 patients (57.8%) had lymph node involvement and 60 patients (72.3%) had distant metastases. Pathological evaluation showed that 51 patients (61.4%) had WD-NET and 32 patients (38.6%) had PD-NEC. Among WD-NETs, there were 14 patients (16.9%) in G1 (≤2%), 19 patients (22.9%) in G2a (3–9%), 9 patients (10.8%) in G2b (10–20%), and 28 patients (33.7%) in G3a (>20%) (Table 1).

Table 1: Patient characteristics.

Characteristics
NET (%)
NEC (%)
All (%)

Gender

    Female ()
26 (51.0)
7 (21.9)
33 (39.7)

    Male ()
25 (49.0)
25 (78.1)
50 (60.3)

Primary sites ()

    Pancreas
19 (37.3)
8 (25.0)
27 (32.5)

    Gastrointestinal
24 (47.0)
19 (59.4)
43 (51.8)

    Primary unknown
8 (15.7)
5 (15.6)
13 (15.7)

Metastatic sites ()

    Liver
36 (70.6)
13 (40.6)
49 (59.0)

    Lymph nodes
21 (41.2)
27 (84.4)
48 (57.8)

    Bone
9 (17.6)
10 (31.3)
19 (22.9)

    Lung
4 (7.8)
1 (3.1)
5 (6.0)

    Other
6 (11.7)
7 (21.9)
13 (15.7)

NET, neuroendocrine tumor; NEC, neuroendocrine carcinoma.

3.2. Complementary PET/CT Qualitative Evaluation

3.2.1. Comparison in Sensitivity

For all patients, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE was positive in 53 cases and negative in 30 cases, while ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was positive in 62 cases and negative in 21 cases. Overall, ¹⁸F-FDG assessment was found to have a better sensitivity (74.7%) compared with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE (63.8%), although it is not statistically significant (). Remarkably, we found that the sensitivity of dual tracers (94.0%) was significantly higher than that with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE or ¹⁸F-FDG alone (). For NET and NEC, the sensitivity was 80.39% (41/51) and 37.5% (12/32) with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and was 58.82% (30/51) and 100% (32/32) with ¹⁸F-FDG. Separating from the primary sites, the sensitivity of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE in pancreatic NET was higher than that in gastrointestinal NET (NET: 89.5% versus 75.0%, ; NEC: 75.0% versus 31.6%, ). However, ¹⁸F-FDG showed no difference between pancreatic and gastrointestinal NENs in terms of sensitivity.

3.2.2. Complementary PET/CT Semiquantitative Evaluation

Table 2 illustrates the sensitivities and in correlation with primary sites and grades. The uptake values of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE in PanNENs were significantly higher than those in GI-NEN ( versus , ). The values of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in PanNEN had a trend toward a lower SUV than that in GI-NEN ( versus , ) (Figure 1).

Table 2: Sensitivity and uptake of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for different primary sites and grades.

Sensitivity (%)
(mean ± SD)

⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE
¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT
⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE
¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT

Primary lesion

    Gastrointestinal tract
55.8%
74.4%
16.75 ± 2.62
7.56 ± 0.87

    Pancreas
85.2%
66.7%
29.87 ± 4.77
6.51 ± 0.78

WD NET
80.4%
58.8%
28.87 ± 3.52
4.51 ± 0.45

    Gastrointestinal NET
75.0%
54.2%
22.68 ± 2.77
3.71 ± 0.45

    Pancreatic NET
89.5%
52.6%
31.19 ± 4.25
5.13 ± 0.93

PD NEC
37.5%
100.0%
10.86 ± 1.78
11.46 ± 0.75

    Gastrointestinal NEC
31.6%
100.0%
9.26 ± 1.25
12.44 ± 1.11

    Pancreatic NEC
75.0%
100.0%
18.23 ± 5.93
10.23 ± 0.67

WD, well-differentiated; PD, poorly differentiated; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; NEC, neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Figure 1: Comparison of SUVmax of PET/CT according to primary sites ((a) and (b)) and tumor grade ((c) and (d)). The sensitivity of group A (G1 + G2a = Ki-67 < 10%), group B (G2b + G3a = well-differentiated neoplasms with Ki-67 ≥ 10%), and group C (G3b = poorly differentiated neoplasms with Ki-67 > 20%) in PET/CT imaging.

3.2.3. Comparison in Different Pathological Groups

The sensitivity of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG in G1/G2a/G2b/G3a/G3b was 78.6%/73.3%/88.9%/77.8%/37.5% and 50.0%/52.6%/66.7%/77.8%/100.0%. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE imaging provided a sensitivity of >73% in WD-NET (G1–G3a) and only 37.5% in PD-NEC (G3b). For G1 and G2a (Ki-67 < 10%), a statistically significant positive correlation between Ki-67 and the sensitivity with ¹⁸F-FDG could be found, and the sensitivity in G1 and G2a (Ki-67 < 10%) was about 50%, increasing dramatically when the Ki-67 index was over 10%. The sensitivity in G3a reached 77.8% and that in G3b was 100%. The patients were divided into 3 groups: group A (G1 + G2a), group B (G2b + G3a), and group C (G3b). With this grouping, the sensitivity of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG in group A/B/C was 78.8%/83.3%/37.5% and 52.0%/72.2%/100.0%. Importantly, we found that the sensitivities of imaging with dual tracers in groups A/B/C were 84.8%/100%/100%, which were significantly higher than that with the single tracer. There was a significant negative correlation between Ki-67 and ⁶⁸Ga DOTATATE (; ), while a positive correlation was noted between Ki-67 and ¹⁸F-FDG value (; ). Moreover, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE showed a negative correlation with Ki-67 index (; ). However, ¹⁸F-FDG was positively correlated with Ki-67 index ( = 0.617; ) (Figure 1).

3.2.4. Concordant and Discordant Findings

When combining the results of the dual-tracer PET/CT, 37 patients were positive in both tracers, and 16 patients were ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE-positive and ¹⁸F-FDG-negative, while 25 patients were ¹⁸F-FDG-positive and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE-negative. 5 patients were negative in both tracers (Table 3).

Table 3: Concordant and discordant findings.

⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE
Positive
Positive
Negative
Negative

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative

Primary lesion ()

    Pancreas
14
9
4
0

    Gastrointestinal tract
18
6
14
5

    CUP
5
1
7
0

Metastatic sites

    Liver
27
11
9
1

    Lymph node
22
7
18
0

    Bone
8
2
8
0

Ki-67 range

    Group A ()
15 (45.5%)
11 (33.3%)
2 (6.1%)
5 (15.1%)

    Group B ()
10 (55.5%)
5 (27.8%)
3 (16.7%)
0

    Group C ()
12 (37.5%)
0
20 (62.5%)
0

CUP, Cancer of unknown primary.

⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT findings were concordant in 37 patients with 25 WD-NETs and in 12 PD-NECs. Only 1 patient was diagnosed as localized duodenal NEN. The remaining 36 patients had regional lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, or both mainly occurring in liver or bone. Of 27 patients with liver metastases, 8 patients (29.6%) examined via ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE showed heterogeneity in SSTR expression. Of 8 patients with bone metastases, imaging findings of 5 patients (62.5%) demonstrated that ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE highlighted more bone lesions than ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Of 22 patients with lymph node involvement, the dual tracers with 5 patients (22.7%) showed that ¹⁸F-FDG findings could be more prominent than those with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE (Figure 2).

Figure 2: A 37-year-old women with pancreatic NEC G3 (Ki-67 = 80%) and lymph node, liver, and bone metastases, from whom the primary lesion has been resected. 18F-FDG PET/CT showed more liver lesions, while ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE detected more bone lesions. ((A) and (a)) Liver lesions showed heterogeneity in SSTR expression. ((B) and (b) and (C) and (c)) ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT failed to show bone metastases in rib and lumbar vertebra.

5 patients showed negative results in both two tracers, with a histological diagnosis of group A. 1 patient was diagnosed as duodenal NET G2 (Ki-67: 3%) with multiple liver metastases (largest lesion: 7.2 cm × 4.7 cm). The remaining 4 patients had rectal or gastric NET (G1/2) with lesions smaller than 5 mm.

3.3. Treatment and Follow-Up

Of the 83 patients, 26 performed radical surgery; 57 (31 NET and 26 NEC) unresectable patients were treated with palliative surgery, SSA, chemotherapy, and TACE. The median follow-up was 21 months (in the range of 2–62 months). During the follow-up period, 9 (6 NEC and 3 NET) patients died of the progressive disease. Unresectable patients with positive results solely with ¹⁸F-FDG showed the worst prognosis, while those positive solely with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE showed the best prognosis. For unresectable patients with NET (), being ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE-negative was associated with worse prognosis (HR: 10.4; 95% CI: 1.5–78.2; ), and being ¹⁸F-FDG-positive tended to be correlated with a worse prognosis (HR: 3.6; 95% CI: 0.7–9.8; ). For unresectable patients with NEC (), being ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE-negative also tended to be associated with a worse prognosis (HR: 2.4; 95% CI: 0.3–5.4; ) (Figure 3).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 3: The overall survival of unresectable patients detected with dual tracers: (a) Kaplan-Meier survival curve for unresectable patients, (A) positive for both tracers, (B) ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TATE only, and (C) ¹⁸F-FDG only; (b) unresectable NET patients with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TATE results (positive or negative); (c) unresectable NET patients with ¹⁸F-FDG results (positive or negative); (d) unresectable NEC patients with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TATE results (positive or negative).

4. Discussion

⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT play a crucial role in the diagnosis and clinical management of NENs with morphologic and functional information. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE was found to be superior to ¹⁸F-FDG in WD-NET, whereas ¹⁸F-FDG was more sensitive in PD-NEC [15]. Considering the costs of molecular imaging, choosing the selected patients for the specific PET/CT imaging is of vital importance. Analyzing the results produced using both tracers for different grades and primary sites could be a balanced approach. The aim of the present study was to compare ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in GEP-NENs and to investigate the relationship between the complementary PET/CT results and histopathologic findings in clinical and prognostic values in a large, histologically confirmed NEN population.

⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE imaging and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging have been compared in several studies which have been shown to have variable sensitivities in detecting NENs with a relatively small number of patients. Naswa et al. [16] reported that the sensitivity of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTANOC and ¹⁸F-FDG was 91.4% and 42.5%, respectively. Koukouraki et al. [17] demonstrated that the sensitivity of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC and ¹⁸F-FDG was 90% and 68%, respectively, and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTANOC was more sensitive in the detection of primary sites or metastasis than ¹⁸F-FDG [18]. Notably the patients included in this study were mainly WD-NETs with lower glucose metabolism. In the present study, the sensitivity of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was 63.85% and 74.70%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the sensitivity of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE was mainly correlated with the degree of differentiation, instead of correlation with Ki-67 index. The sensitivity of ¹⁸F-FDG showed a positive correlation with the Ki-67 index and differentiation. From ¹⁸F-FDG imaging, the sensitivity was under 53% for patients with Ki-67 < 10% and 100% for PD-NEC. of patients with NEC was low even for those who had positive results under ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE. We also observed that patients with Ki-67 < 10% showed low uptake in ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. On consideration of the weak significance of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE for PD-NEC and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for lower-grade NET, our study demonstrated that ¹⁸F-FDG is more suitable for patients with Ki-67 ≥ 10%, and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE is less advantageous in PD-NEC and should be tailored to the individual patients.

Our study demonstrated that PET/CT uptake was statistically significantly different between subgroups of GEP-NENs according to grading. The cohort was separated into 3 groups: A (G1 + G2a), B (G2b + G3a), and C (G3b). Group B showed higher sensitivity for ¹⁸F-FDG than group A, and the median increased significantly, indicating relatively quick proliferation rate associated with Ki-67 index. Strosberg [19] proposed chemotherapy as a treatment option for tumors with Ki-67 ≥ 10%, especially those with higher ¹⁸F-FDG activity. Such tumors showed high proliferative capacity and aggressive behavior and are recommended for chemotherapy after PRRT or somatostatin therapy. In this way, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT may be suitable for identifying patients with aggressive conditions in group B who could benefit from chemotherapy. Thus, PET/CT imaging may establish the missing link between histopathologic findings and the treatment regimen.

Based on our results, dual tracers’ assessment is recommended for WD-NET with Ki-67 ≥ 10% (G2b and G3a). ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG were complementary in detecting lesions and dual-trace PET/CT showed an advantage in the assessment of SSA, PRRT, and chemotherapy. We proposed that WD-NET patients with Ki-67 ≥ 10% should be examined using dual tracers upon diagnosis. We also suggest that ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE should be performed solely in WD-NET patients with Ki-67 < 10% and ¹⁸F-FDG is sufficient for PD NEC. Moreover, repeated PET/CT is warranted when disease progresses rapidly, considering the heterogeneous expression and complementary findings to histopathology (Figure 4).

Figure 4: PET/CT imaging and treatment regime.

We investigated the correlations between dual tracers and Ki-67 index. or was positively correlated with Ki-67 index with respect to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and negatively correlated with Ki-67 index with respect to ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE. of PET/CT may be a suitable biomarker for evaluation of the biological behavior of NENs. The relationship between and Ki-67 index was weak, but it showed a consistency with . However, may be influenced by technical elements, while could reduce the differences attributable to equipment and operation to some extent.

GEP-NENs are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that display great variability in biological behaviors and clinical outcomes [20]. This requires accurate diagnostic techniques for precise staging and choice of therapy. The standard grading is mainly based on the immunohistochemistry of the proliferation marker Ki-67. However, there are many lesions with variable tracer uptake at different parts of the tumor. Especially within the same organ, these lesions may prevent the biopsy from being a comprehensive reflection of tumor heterogeneity in vivo, leading to inaccurate Ki-67 index results. Therefore, dual-trace PET/CT, which is a whole-body noninvasive alternative, is warranted to overcome the shortcomings of histopathologic grading. The findings of this study included the ability of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE to detect heterogeneity in tumors and variable expression in primary sites. of PanNEN was higher than that of GI-NENs, which was consistent with prior studies [21, 22], where the investigators found higher levels of messenger RNA expression of SSTR2 and SSTR5 in pancreatic than in gastrointestinal NENs. In this way, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE is more sensitive in PanNEN, but it may miss some lesions in GI-NEN. However, SUVmax of PanNEN and GI-NEN showed no difference for ¹⁸F-FDG, which is complementary to ⁶⁸Ga DOTATATE. Another finding of the present study was that ⁶⁸Ga DOTATATE has a superb ability to detect heterogeneity in metastatic lesions, which is beneficial for us to select the optimal protocol. We believe that complementary PET/CT can evaluate the tumors’ heterogeneity and influence treatment options.

The morphological findings and Ki-67 index are considered important prognostic markers in NENs. One major limitation of these histopathological parameters as prognostic markers is the requirement for tissue sampling, which is not always feasible. A few studies have demonstrated the prognostic value of ¹⁸F-FDG and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with NENs. ¹⁸F-FDG was an independent predictor of PFS [23, 24]. ¹⁸F-FDG > 3 was demonstrated to be independent predictor of disease progression, superior to conventional prognostic factors such as Ki-67 index and serum CgA [25]. SSTR expression was found to be a positive prognostic factor, and it was therefore expected that SSTR-base PET/CT would also have prognostic value in NENs [26]. Sharma et al. [27] demonstrated the prognostic value of measured with ⁶⁸Ga DOTATATE in 37 patients with NET. ≥ 14.5 was found to distinguish patients with progressive and those with nonprogressive disease. A major limitation of the prior studies was that most of the patients included were WD-NET, which may involve selection bias. Our study enrolled 57 unresectable patients (31 NET and 26 NEC). Unresectable patients positive with ¹⁸F-FDG alone showed the worst prognosis, while those positive with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE alone had the best prognosis. NET patients with predominant ¹⁸F-FDG uptake and a negative ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE scans had worse prognosis. There is a strong association between high ¹⁸F-FDG uptake and worse outcome even in patients with WD-NETs. However, PD-NEC with negative ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE uptake may lead to worse prognosis. The present study has several limitations. First, our study is retrospective, and the second limitation is that the follow-up time was not long enough to assess treatment response, considering the relatively inert biological behavior of NENs.

Noninvasive dual-tracer imaging with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT seems promising as an alternative to tissue sampling, due to its capacity to reflect two different aspects of tumor biology, SSTR expression and glucose metabolism, respectively. Accordingly, imaging with dual tracer is recommended for WD-NET patients with Ki-67 ≥ 10%, providing information for selection of SSA, PRRT, and chemotherapy. Taking the advantages of dual-tracer imaging in detecting lesions is useful for accurate clinical management. Dual-tracer imaging also shows a clearly linear correlation between and Ki-67 index. On consideration of heterogeneous expression and complementary findings to histopathology, our results suggested that repeated dual-tracer imaging is warranted to evaluate dynamic biological behavior and prognosis.

Abbreviations

GEP-NENs: | Gastroenteropancreatic neoplasms
PD: | Poorly differentiated
WD: | Well-differentiated
OS: | Overall survival
NET: | Neuroendocrine tumor
NEC: | Neuroendocrine carcinoma
PRRT: | Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Authors’ Contributions

Panpan Zhang and Jiangyuan Yu contributed equally to this work. Panpan Zhang and Jiangyuan Yu wrote the manuscript and analyzed the data. Jie Li, Lin Shen, Nan Li, Hua Zhu, Shizhen Zhai, and Yan Zhang collected patient data and technical information. Zhi Yang and Ming Lu reviewed and helped revise the manuscript.

References

R. Garcia-Carbonero, J. Capdevila, G. Crespo-Herrero et al., “Incidence, patterns of care and prognostic factors for outcome of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs): results from the national cancer registry of Spain (RGETNE),” Annals of Oncology, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1794–1803, 2010.

D. S. Klimstra, I. R. Modlin, N. V. Adsay et al., “Pathology reporting of neuroendocrine tumors: Application of the delphic consensus process to the development of a minimum pathology data set,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 300–313, 2010.

G. Carlinfante, P. Baccarini, D. Berretti et al., “Ki-67 cytological index can distinguish well-differentiated from poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A comparative cytohistological study of 53 cases,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 465, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2014.

G. Rindi, G. Klöppel, A. Couvelard et al., “TNM staging of midgut and hindgut (neuro) endocrine tumors: A consensus proposal including a grading system,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 451, no. 4, pp. 757–762, 2007.

J. C. Yao, A. T. Phan, D. Z. Chang et al., “Efficacy of RAD001 (everolimus) and octreotide LAR in advanced low- to intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumors: results of a phase II study,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 26, no. 26, pp. 4311–4318, 2008.

S. Singh, J. Hallet, C. Rowsell, and C. H. L. Law, “Variability of Ki67 labeling index in multiple neuroendocrine tumors specimens over the course of the disease,” European Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1517–1522, 2014.

E. Grande, J. J. Díez, V. Pachón, and A. Carrato, “Advances in the therapy of gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs),” Clinical and Translational Oncology, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 481–492, 2010.

M. Miederer, S. Seidl, A. Buck et al., “Correlation of immunohistopathological expression of somatostatin receptor 2 with standardised uptake values in 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 48–52, 2009.

W. A. P. Breeman, E. de Blois, H. Sze Chan, M. Konijnenberg, D. J. Kwekkeboom, and E. P. Krenning, “⁶⁸Ga-labeled DOTA-peptides and ⁶⁸Ga-labeled radiopharmaceuticals for positron emission tomography: current status of research, clinical applications, and future perspectives,” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 314–321, 2011.

N. Naswa, P. Sharma, A. Kumar et al., “Gallium-68-DOTA-NOC PET/CT of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A prospective single-center study,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 197, no. 5, pp. 1221–1228, 2011.

I. Kayani, J. B. Bomanji, A. Groves et al., “Functional imaging of neuroendocrine tumors with combined PET/CT using 68Ga-DOTATATE (Dota-DPhe1, Tyr3-octreotate) and 18F-FDG,” Cancer, vol. 112, no. 11, pp. 2447–2455, 2008.

R. Abgral, S. Leboulleux, D. Déandreis et al., “Performance of 18fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy for high Ki67 (≥10%) well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma staging,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 665–671, 2011.

D. H. Simsek, S. Kuyumcu, C. Turkmen et al., “Can complementary 68Ga-dotatate and 18F-FDG PET/CT establish the missing link between histopathology and therapeutic approach in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors?” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 1811–1817, 2014.

E. Panagiotidis, A. Alshammari, S. Michopoulou et al., “Comparison of the impact of 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT on clinical management in patients with Neuroendocrine tumors,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 91–96, 2017.

M. H. Squires, N. Volkan Adsay, D. M. Schuster et al., “Octreoscan Versus FDG-PET for Neuroendocrine Tumor Staging: A Biological Approach,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 2295–2301, 2015.

N. Naswa, P. Sharma, S. K. Gupta et al., “Dual tracer functional imaging of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors using 68Ga-DOTA-NOC PET-CT and 18F-FDG PET-CT: Competitive or complimentary?” Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. e27–e34, 2014.

S. Koukouraki, L. G. Strauss, V. Georgoulias, M. Eisenhut, U. Haberkorn, and A. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, “Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC and [¹⁸F]FDG in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours scheduled for ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC therapy,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1115–1122, 2006.

V. Ambrosini, D. Campana, L. Bodei et al., “68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT clinical impact in patients with neuroendocrine tumors.,” Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 669–673, 2010.

J. R. Strosberg, “Systemic treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs): Cuirrent approaches and future options,” Endocrine Practice, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 167–175, 2014.

Z. Yang, L. H. Tang, and D. S. Klimstra, “Effect of tumor heterogeneity on the assessment of Ki67 labeling index in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the liver: Implications for prognostic stratification,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 853–860, 2011.

D. Campana, V. Ambrosini, R. Pezzilli et al., “Standardized uptake values of68Ga-DOTANOC PET: a promising prognostic tool in neuroendocrine tumors,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 353–359, 2010.

D. O'Toole, A. Saveanu, A. Couvelard et al., “The analysis of quantitative expression of somatostatin and dopamine receptors in gastro-entero-pancreatic tumours opens new therapeutic strategies,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 155, no. 6, pp. 849–857, 2006.

A. Sundin and A. Rockall, “Therapeutic monitoring of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: The challenges ahead,” Neuroendocrinology, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 261–271, 2012.

E. Garin, F. Le Jeune, A. Devillers et al., “Predictive value of 18F-FDG PET and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in patients with metastatic endocrine tumors,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 858–864, 2009.

T. Binderup, U. Knigge, A. Loft, B. Federspiel, and A. Kjaer, “18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography predicts survival of patients with neuroendocrine tumors,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 978–985, 2010.

H. S. Kim, H. S. Lee, and W. H. Kim, “Clinical significance of protein expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and somatostatin receptors in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors,” Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 181–188, 2011.

P. Sharma, N. Naswa, S. S. KC et al., “Comparison of the prognostic values of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 2194–2202, 2014.