Complexity
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 8016345, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8016345

Research Article

Valve-Pump Parallel Variable Mode Control for Complex Speed Regulation Processes

Haigang Ding, Henan Song, Jiyun Zhao, and Chaowen Lin

School of Mechatronic Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221106, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Haigang Ding; haierdhg@126.com

Received 20 June 2018; Accepted 30 July 2018; Published 3 September 2018

Academic Editor: Jing Na

Copyright © 2018 Haigang Ding et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

To improve comprehensive performances of hydraulic systems with complex speed regulation processes, this paper proposes a new control scheme, valve-pump parallel variable mode control, which can change control modes according to control requirements and adjust the proportion of valve control and pump control in the speed regulation process. In this paper, we design a valve-pump parallel variable mode control system, explain its working principle, establish its mathematical model, analyse the influences of valve control on the system parameters, and at last, build an experimental system to carry out an experimental research. The experimental results show that during the speed regulation process, control modes could vary with control requirements, the switch between different control modes is smooth and meets expectations, and the proposed control approach can achieve excellent comprehensive performances for complex speed regulation, such as low-speed stability, fast response to load disturbance, and high efficiency. The valve-pump parallel variable mode control makes hydraulic control systems more flexible and suitable and enrich the current control schemes of hydraulic speed regulation systems.

1. Introduction

Hydraulic control has the characteristics of large power to mass ratio, high speed stiffness, and easy regulation and is widely used in aerospace, engineering machinery, and machine tools [1, 2]. The hydraulic hoists are the main equipment to lift materials, equipment, and personnel in high gas mines. Hydraulic hoists adopts hydraulic transmission with complex speed regulation process, since the process includes five stages of start, acceleration (acc.), constant speed, deceleration (dec.), and stop, and requires different control performances at different operating phase [3, 4]. The traditional hydraulic control has two basic forms: valve control and pump control. The dynamic response of the valve control is fast, but the efficiency is low [5, 6]; the efficiency of the pump control is high, but the dynamic response is slow [7–9]. Therefore, the independent pump control or valve control cannot solve the conflict between efficiency and response, and is not suitable to the complex speed regulation.

Recently, the valve-pump combined control has become the development direction of hydraulic control, which integrates the advantages of valve control and pump control, and could strike a balance between energy efficiency and dynamic response. The valve-pump combined control is a complex electrohydraulic control with nonlinearity [10–12] and includes two types, series control and parallel control. Manasek [13] proposed a valve-pump series control to fasten the pump control response. Shen et al. and Jin et al. [14, 15] added energy-regulating device to above series control to improve the response at acceleration stage. Xu et al. [16] proposed a pump/valve coordinate control of the independent metering system for mobile machinery, which is also valve-pump series control and could work at work in multimodes. However, valve-pump series control is not suitable for applications with high power, because the control valve connected in series on the main circuit limits the maximum system flow.

The valve-pump parallel control could avoid this disadvantage, for the control valve is mounted in parallel on the main circuit. Qi et al. [17], Cochoy et al. [18], and Rongjie et al. [19] applied the parallel control to electrohydraulic actuators (EHA) to improve the flight’s dynamic characteristics, which are position servo systems. At present, the valve-pump parallel control is mainly used in the position control system with a single control model and has not yet been used to speed regulation systems. In order to achieve excellent control performances for speed regulation systems, such as low-speed stability, fast response, and high efficiency, the valve-pump parallel control should change its control model during the adjustment process, but it is a challenging work, and nobody has studied it so far.

To improve comprehensive performances for complex speed regulation process, this paper puts forward a new kind of hydraulic control scheme: valve-pump parallel variable mode control, which can change control mode according to control requirements and can also adjust the proportion of valve control and pump control in the speed regulation process. In this paper, we design a valve-pump parallel variable mode control system, clarify its working principle, establish its mathematical model, and set up an experimental system to study control performances. The valve-pump parallel variable mode control could enrich the current hydraulic control method and make the hydraulic control system more flexible and adaptable. It has a wide application value in engineering with complex speed regulation process.

2. System Design and Working Principle

The valve-pump parallel variable mode control system mainly consists of a proportional variable pump (PVP), a proportional directional valve (PDV), a hydraulic motor, and a variable model controller, as shown in Figure 1. In the new system, the PDV is connected in parallel with the PVP outlet, the control valve and pump work together to regulate the rotating speed of hydraulic motor. Figure 2 shows the control principle of the proposed system; it is obvious that the control system is a multiple input and single output control system, and the variable model controller outputs two control signal, one to the PVP to regulate its displacement, another to the PDV to control its opening.

Figure 1: The schematic diagram of valve-pump parallel variable mode control. 1: oil source; 2: PDV; 3: PVP; 4: shuttle valve; 5: replenishing arrangement; 6: hydraulic motor; 7: speed encoder; 8: variable mode controller.

Figure 2: Control principle of valve-pump parallel variable mode control.

In order to show the regulation role of the valve control circuit and pump control circuit in the combined regulation [20], we propose a concept of valve-pump weight ratio: , where is the weight of valve control circuit, and is the weight of pump control circuit.

If , it indicates that the function of valve control is greater than the pump control, so the system is mainly controlled by PDV.

If , it means that the function of pump control is greater than the valve control, so the system is mainly controlled by PVP.

In the new system, the PDV can work in two states: leaking and replenishing, so the parallel control system could work at following three control models in a working cycle, as shown in Figure 3.

(1)Under leaking parallel valve control (LPVC) mode at the start and stop stages. Under LPVC mode, the PDV works at the leaking state, and the oil from the hydraulic motor high pressure cavity leaks into the tank through PDV, and the flow supply into the hydraulic motor is equal to the pump flow minus the valve flow, meanwhile, , so the system is mainly controlled by PDV to enhance low-speed stability of hydraulic motor.(2)Under replenishing parallel valve control (RPVC) mode at the constant speed stage. Under RPVC mode, the PDV works at the replenishing state, and the oil source supplies fluid to the hydraulic motor high pressure cavity through PDV, and the flow supply into the motor is equal to the pump flow plus the valve flow, meanwhile, , so the system is mainly controlled by PDV to improve the dynamic response to load disturbance.(3)Under parallel pump control (PPC) mode at the acceleration and deceleration stages. Under PPC mode, the PDV could work at both leaking status and replenishing status, meanwhile, , so the system is mainly controlled by PVP to keep high efficiency. The PPC mode is regarded as the transition phase between LPVC and RPVC.

Figure 3: Speed regulation process in a working circle.

3. System Mathematical Modeling

The valve-pump parallel variable model control system is made up of pump control circuit, valve control circuit, and hydraulic motor circuit [21]. In the section above, three control links will be established, respectively, and combined into a control block diagram.

3.1. Pump Control Circuit

The variable mechanism of PVP is usually considered as a first-order inertia element [22], and its flow rate can be written as

where and are the pump flow rate under load and without load, respectively, is the pump total leakage coefficient, is the pump outlet pressure, is the gain of input voltage-unload flow, is the break frequency of the variable mechanism, and is the pump control input.

3.2. Valve Control Link

The orifice flow equation of the PDV can be expressed as

where is the PDV flow rate, is the valve constant, and is the control voltage, is the pressure drop across orifice, when PDV works at leaking status, when PDV works at replenishing status, in which is the oil supplying pressure for PDV.

Using the Taylor series methods, the linearized orifice flow equation under LPVC mode is written as

where , , and are the flow rate, flow gain, and flow-pressure gain of PDV under LPVC mode, respectively.

Similarly, the linearized orifice flow equation under RPVC mode could be given by

where , , and are the flow rate, flow gain, flow-pressure gain of PDV under RPVC mode, respectively.

The PDVC is usually considered as a second-order oscillating link [23, 24], and its unload flow rate is given by

where represents and , , and are the hydraulic natural frequency and damping ratio of the PDV, respectively.

3.3. Hydraulic Motor Circuit

The continuity equation of the whole system is

where is the motor angular speed, is a motor leakage coefficient, is the motor displacement, and is the average volume of high-pressure chamber. In (6), “−” is used under LVPC model, and “+” is used under RVPC model.

The torque balance equation for the hydraulic motor is

where is the equivalent total inertia, is the viscous damping coefficient, and is the load torque produced by the loading pump.

Combining (1), (3), (4), (5), (6), and (7), the open loop dynamic equations of the parallel control system are given by

where the subscript represents and , so , , , and , , and are the total leakage coefficient, damping ratio, and natural frequency under LPVC mode, respectively; , , , and , , and are the total leakage coefficient, damping ratio and natural frequency under RPVC mode, respectively.

When PDV closed, valve-pump parallel control switches to single pump control, and its open loop dynamic equation [25, 26] is

where , , , , and are the total leakage coefficient, damping ratio, and hydraulic natural frequency under single pump control mode. Comparing (8) and (9), the single pump control may be considered a special case of valve-pump combined control.

The encoder used to measuring to hydraulic motor speed. It responds fast and could be simplified as a proportional element:

where is the feedback gain, is the feedback voltage, and is the motor angular velocity.

3.4. Total System Mathematical Model

Combining the three links above, the block diagram of the parallel control system is obtained, as shown in Figure 4. The block diagram indicates that the valve-pump parallel system is a type-0 system, and the valve control circuit and pump control circuit are all unstable. To obtain good control performances, the integral correction is applied to control circuits. After correction, the open loop transfer functions of the two control circuits are, respectively, given by:

where , and and are the open loop gain and integral gain of the corrected valve control circuit, respectively; , and and are the open loop gain and integral gain of the corrected pump control circuit, respectively.

Figure 4: Block diagram of the valve-pump parallel variable mode control system.

Therefore, the synthetical open loop gain under LPVC mode is

Similarly, the synthetical open loop gain under RPVC mode is

4. System Parameters Analysis

Comparing with the single pump control system, the system parameters in valve-pump parallel variable model control have the following characteristics:

(1)The same hydraulic natural frequency. Equations (8) and (9) indicate that the introduction of valve control does not change the system’s hydraulic natural frequency, and the system both under LPVC mode and RPVC mode has the same hydraulic natural frequency as the single pump control system.(2)Larger and variable total leakage coefficients. After the introducing valve control to a pump control system, the flow-pressure gain and are added into the total leakage coefficient, and there are under LPVC mode and under RPVC mode. Generally, is small and stable, but and are greater than and vary widely with operating points, such as pressure and control input , according to and . Therefore, and are larger and vary widely with operating points.(3)Greater and variable damping ratios. Since the damping ratio is proportional to the total leakage coefficient, damping ratios in the valve-pump parallel control system are much greater than that of single pump control systems, and there are and . Moreover, both and also vary widely with operating points. In general, greater damping ratios will contribute to system stability, but great variation of damping ratios might cause difficulty of parameter prediction.(4)Faster dynamic response. As we know, increasing the open loop gain will speed up system response. As long as the weighting factors are set reasonably, the open loop gain of the valve-pump parallel control systems will be always greater than that of single pump control systems, that is, and . Therefore, the valve-pump parallel control systems will respond faster than the single pump control system.(5)RPVC mode more flexible. Increasing the flow gain will increase the open-loop gain and then fasten system response. Comparing the expressions of flow gain under RPVC mode and LPVC mode, and , and can be further increased by increasing the supplying pressure , and if , there is , and RPVC will respond faster than LPVC.

5. Experiment and Analysis

5.1. Experimental System

According to the schematic diagram in Figure 1, we build a valve-pump parallel variable mode control experimental system, as shown in Figures 5 and 6. The experimental system mainly consists of the driving subsystem, load subsystem, and measurement and control subsystem. The driving subsystem is a closed hydraulic circuit, and the PVP and PDV work together under different control modes to drive a hydraulic motor. The load subsystem shown in Figure 6 mainly includes a loading motor and a proportional relief valve (PRV), the loading pump has the same displacement with the driving motor, and its loading pressure is regulated by the PRV. The main system configuration is listed in Table 1. The nominal pressure of the system is 25 MPa, total power 11 kW, system flow 50 L/min (including pump control flow 40 L/min and valve control flow 10 L/min), hydraulic motor displacement 468 mL/r, maximum speed 90 r/min, and rotational inertia 48 kg·m², replenishing pressure 0.8 MPa, flushing pressure 0.5 MPa.

Figure 5: Schematic framework of the experimental system. 1: electric motor; 2: fixed displacement pump; 3: PDV; 5: shuttle valve; 6: replenishing arrangement; 7: hydraulic motor; 8: inertia; 9: encoder; 10: loading motor; 11: PRV.

Figure 6: Experimental system in valve-pump parallel variable mode control.

Table 1: System configuration.

Components
Specification

Electric motor
Power 11 kW, rated speed 1500 r/min

PVP
Axial piston pump, geometric displacement 40 mL/r, electrohydraulic control with proportional solenoid, 0–10 V input

PDV
4/3 version, direct operated, size 6, rated flow 9 L/min at bar, frequency 60 Hz, damping ratio 0.7, 0–10 V input

PRV
Pilot operated, pressure rating 25 MPa, maximum flow 200 L/min, 0–10 V input

Hydraulic motor
Speed range 0–90 r/min, displacement 468 mL/r, rated pressure 40 MPa

Rotational inertia
48 kgm², modular design

Encoder
2000 P/r, TTL output

The measurement and control subsystem is developed on the LabVIEW platform, as shown in Figure 7. Various types of sensors are used to measure the system pressures, flow of pump and valve, and hydraulic motor speed. These signals are captured by the acquisition card 6229 and inputted into the IPC for data processing, display, and storage. The motor speed is fed back to the variable mode controller and compared with the command. After the calculation, the controller output control signals to the PVP, PDV, and PRV via the acquisition card to realize the variable mode control. By using the variable mode controller, the proposed control system could work under LPVC mode, RPVC mode, and PPC mode.

Figure 7: Measurement and control subsystem.

5.2. Experiments and Analysis

From Section 3, we know that the pump control circuit and valve control circuit is unstable, so before the valve-pump parallel variable model control, the two control circuit should be compensated. The PI compensation is applied to the two control circuits, and its transfer function is given by

where is the proportional gain, is the internal time, is the internal gain and .

The optimal PI parameters are obtained through step response experiments. As shown in Table 2, there is always a relationship, in the two control circuits, so the PI compensation can be considered as an internal compensation, as discussed in Section 3.4.

Table 2: PI parameter setting of each control circuit.

Control circuit

Adaptation speed

Pump control
0.3
0.18
1.67
All

Valve control for oil leaking
0.6
0.12
5
0~15 r/min

Valve control for oil replenishing
0.7
0.12
5.8
55~70 r/min

Then, the valve-pump parallel variable mode control is applied to a trapezoidal speed regulation process, which is a complexed process and consists of the stages of start-up, acceleration, constant speed, deceleration, and stop. The LPVC mode is used to the star-up and stop stages with speed below 10 r/min, the PPC mode is used to the acceleration and deceleration stages, and the RPVC mode is used to the constant speed stage with speed of 60 r/min, and the setting of valve-pump weight ratio in each speed regulation stage is shown in Table 3. Figure 8 shows the dynamic response of valve-pump parallel variable mode control in a working cycle, where a 2 MPa step pressure is applied to PRV to produce step load disturbance at the uniform speed stage. Here we can obtain the following results from the experiment results.

(1)The hydraulic speed below 10 r/min keeps stable by LVPC, so that LPVC improves the low-speed stability at the start-up and stop stages; the motor speed quickly returns to 60 r/min by RPVC when subjected to load disturbance, so RPVC contributes to realize the fast response to load disturbance at the constant speed stage; the PPC achieves the fast tracking of speed at the acceleration and deceleration stages. Therefore, during the complex speed regulation process, the valve-pump parallel variable mode control obtains excellent comprehensive characteristics.(2)During the speed adjustment process, the working state of control valve and control pump is in line with expectations, and the switch between different control modes is smooth and continuous. In particular, the valve control voltage changes from a negative value, about −3.8 V to a positive value, about 1.5 V, and then to a negative value, about −5 V, and the conversion between the oil leaking status and oil replenishing status is achieved.(3)During the whole speed adjustment process, the variable pump provides most of the flow, about 90% of total system flow, while the control valve only works at a small flow state, about 10% of total system flow, so the proposed system could work efficiently as pump control systems [27].

Table 3: at different speed regulation stages.

Speed regulation stage

Control Model

Start-up and stop
1
0.1
10
LPVC

Acc. and dec.
0.1
1
0.1
PPC

Constant speed
1
0.2
5
RPVC

(a) Speed response of driving motor

(b) Pressure and flow

(c) Controlling voltage of pump and valve

Figure 8: Dynamic response in a speed regulation cycle.

6. Conclusion

To improve the comprehensive performances for a complex speed regulation process, we propose a new hydraulic control scheme, that is, valve-pump parallel variable mode control, and its control mode could vary with control requirements during the process of speed regulation. At the start-up and stop stages, the LPVC mode is used to improve the low-speed stability; at the constant speed stage, the RPVC mode is applied to realize the fast response to load disturbance; at the acceleration and deceleration stages, the PPC mode is used to achieve the fast tracking of motor speed.

The valve-pump parallel variable mode control establishes a flexible control mechanism by using double channels of valve control and pump control. Therefore, the new control scheme will enrich the control form of the current hydraulic system, make the electro-hydraulic control system more flexible and adaptive to achieve excellent control performances, and has wide value in future application.

During the control process, the system parameters, such as leakage coefficient and damping ratio, change greatly with the operation points, which will increase the difficulty of system parameter prediction and control. To demonstrate the control characteristics of the proposed scheme itself, this work only uses the traditional PID control. In the future, advanced control strategies will be used to adapt to the parameters variation to further improve comprehensive performances.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (BK20150186).

References

Y. Huang, J. Na, X. Wu, and G. Gao, “Approximation-free control for vehicle active suspensions with hydraulic actuator,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 7258–7267, 2018.

T. Lin, L. Wang, W. Huang, H. Ren, S. Fu, and Q. Chen, “Performance analysis of an automatic idle speed control system with a hydraulic accumulator for pure electric construction machinery,” Automation in Construction, vol. 84, pp. 184–194, 2017.

H. G. Ding, J. Y. Zhao, and L. Zhao, “Analysis on electrohydraulic speed servo control schemes for anti-explosion hydraulic hoisters,” Journal of the China Coal Society, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1407–1411, 2011.

H. G. Ding, J. Y. Zhao, and G. Z. Li, “Analysis of valve-pump combined high power hydraulic speed regulation schemes,” Journal of China Coal Society, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1703–1709, 2013.

G. Shen, Z. Zhu, J. Zhao, W. Zhu, Y. Tang, and X. Li, “Real-time tracking control of electro-hydraulic force servo systems using offline feedback control and adaptive control,” ISA Transactions, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 356–370, 2017.

M. Paloniitty and M. Linjama, “High-linear digital hydraulic valve control by an equal coded valve system and novel switching schemes,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, vol. 232, no. 3, pp. 258–269, 2018.

J. Yao, P. Wang, X. M. Cao, and Z. Wang, “Independent volume-in and volume-out control of an open circuit pump-controlled asymmetric cylinder system,” Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 203–210, 2018.

Z. Quan, L. Quan, and J. Zhang, “Review of energy efficient direct pump controlled cylinder electro-hydraulic technology,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 35, pp. 336–346, 2014.

T. A. Minav, L. I. E. Laurila, and J. J. Pyrhönen, “Analysis of electro-hydraulic lifting system's energy efficiency with direct electric drive pump control,” Automation in Construction, vol. 30, pp. 144–150, 2013.

Q. Zhu, L. Liu, W. Zhang, and S. Li, “Control of complex nonlinear dynamic rational systems,” Complexity, vol. 2018, Article ID 8953035, 12 pages, 2018.

J. Na, A. S. Chen, G. Herrmann, R. Burke, and C. Brace, “Vehicle engine torque estimation via unknown input observer and adaptive parameter estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 409–422, 2018.

J. Yao, Z. Jiao, D. Ma, and L. Yan, “High-accuracy tracking control of hydraulic rotary actuators with modeling uncertainties,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 633–641, 2014.

R. Manasek, “Simulation of an electrohydraulic load-sensing system with AC motor and frequency changer,” in Proceedings of 1st FPNI-PhD Symposium, pp. 311–324, Hamburg, Germany, 2000.

H. K. Shen, B. Jin, and Y. Chen, “Variable speed hydraulic control system based on energy regulation strategy,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 210–213, 2009.

B. Jin, H. K. Shen, and Y. Chen, “Energy-regulation based variable speed hydraulic cylinder position control system,” Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2008.

B. Xu, R. Ding, J. Zhang, M. Cheng, and T. Sun, “Pump/valves coordinate control of the independent metering system for mobile machinery,” Automation in Construction, vol. 57, pp. 98–111, 2015.

X. Qi, Y. Fu, and Z. Wang, “Scheme analysis of power by wire airborne actuation systems,” Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 426–430, 1999.

O. Cochoy, U. Carl, and F. Thielecke, “Integration and control of electromechanical and electrohydraulic actuators in a hybrid primary flight control architecture,” in International Conference on Recent Advances in Aerospace Actuation Systems and Components, pp. 1–8, Toulouse, France, 2007.

K. Rongjie, J. Zongxia, W. Shaoping, and C. Lisha, “Design and simulation of electro-hydrostatic actuator with a built-in power regulator,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 700–706, 2009.

H. Ding, J. Zhao, G. Cheng, S. Wright, and Y. Yao, “The influence of valve-pump weight ratios on the dynamic response of leaking valve-pump parallel control hydraulic systems,” Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 7, p. 1201, 2018.

H. Ding and J. Zhao, “Dynamic characteristic analysis of replenishing/leaking parallel valve control systems,” Automatika, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 182–194, 2017.

A. Roccatello, S. Mancò, and N. Nervegna, “Modelling a variable displacement axial piston pump in a multi-body simulation environment,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 456–468, 2007.

L. H. Manring and N. D. Manring, “Mapping the efficiency of a double acting, single-rod hydraulic-actuator using a critically centered four-way spool valve and a load-sensing pump,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, vol. 140, no. 9, article 091017, 2018.

X. X. Yin, Y. G. Lin, and W. Li, “Modeling and loading compensation of a rotary valve-controlled pitch system for wind turbines,” Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 718–727, 2017.

Y. Shi, T. Wu, M. Cai, and C. Liu, “Modelling and study on the output flow characteristics of expansion energy used hydropneumatic transformer,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1163–1170, 2016.

N. D. Manring, Hydraulic Control Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2005.

Y. Shi, T. Wu, M. Cai, Y. Wang, and W. Xu, “Energy conversion characteristics of a hydropneumatic transformer in a sustainable-energy vehicle,” Applied Energy, vol. 171, pp. 77–85, 2016.