Complexity
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 5691758, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5691758

Research Article

Oscillation Criteria for Third-Order Emden–Fowler Differential Equations with Unbounded Neutral Coefficients

George E. Chatzarakis,¹ Said R. Grace,² Irena Jadlovská,³ Tongxing Li,⁴ and Ercan Tunç⁵

¹Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Educators, School of Pedagogical and Technological Education (ASPETE), 14121 N. Heraklio, Athens, Greece
²Department of Engineering Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Orman, Giza 12221, Egypt
³Department of Mathematics and Theoretical Informatics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Technical University of Košice, B. Němcovej 32, 042 00, Košice, Slovakia
⁴School of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China
⁵Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Gaziosmanpasa University, 60240 Tokat, Turkey

Correspondence should be addressed to Tongxing Li; litongx2007@163.com

Received 10 May 2019; Accepted 22 July 2019; Published 28 August 2019

Academic Editor: András Rontó

Copyright © 2019 George E. Chatzarakis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

New sufficient conditions for the oscillation of all solutions to a class of third-order Emden–Fowler differential equations with unbounded neutral coefficients are established. The criteria obtained essentially improve related results in the literature. In particular, as opposed to known results, new criteria can distinguish solutions of third-order differential equations with different behaviors. Examples are also provided to illustrate the results.

1. Introduction

This paper is concerned with the oscillation of solutions of the third-order Emden–Fowler neutral differential equation

where , is the ratio of odd positive integers. Throughout, the following conditions are assumed to hold:

(C1) are continuous functions, , for large , , and is not identically zero for large ;(C2) are continuous functions, , is strictly increasing, and .

The study of (1) is important due to the further development of the oscillation theory and its practical reasons. Emden–Fowler differential equations have numerous applications in physics (mathematical, theoretical, and chemical physics) and engineering; see, e.g., the papers by Agarwal et al. [1], Li and Rogovchenko [2–5], and Wong [6].

By a solution of (1) we mean a continuous function , , such that and satisfies (1) on . We consider only proper solutions of (1) that satisfy for all . Furthermore, we tacitly suppose that (1) possesses such solutions. Such a solution of (1) is said to be oscillatory if it has arbitrarily large zeros on ; i.e., for any , there exists a such that ; otherwise, it is called nonoscillatory, i.e., if it is either eventually positive or eventually negative. Equation (1) is said to be oscillatory if all its proper solutions oscillate.

In recent years, there has been much research activity concerning the oscillation and asymptotic behavior of solutions to various classes of third-order neutral differential equations. We refer the reader to the papers [2, 7–17] and the references contained therein as examples of recent results on this topic. However, the sufficient conditions established in these papers except [10, 13] ensure that every solution of equations either oscillates or converges to zero as . This means that these results cannot distinguish solutions with different behaviors. On the other hand, the papers [2, 7–17] were concerned with the case where is bounded, i.e., the cases where , , and were considered. In view of the observations above, we wish to develop new sufficient conditions which not only ensure oscillation of (1) but also can be applied to the case where is unbounded. We would like to point out that only a few results are known regarding oscillatory and asymptotic behavior of third-order neutral differential equations for unbounded ; see, e.g., the papers [18–20], where the Riccati transformation technique and comparison method were used to obtain the results. A similar observation as above is valid for these papers as well, i.e., the sufficient conditions established in these papers cannot distinguish solutions with different behaviors too.

Consequently, our work is of significance because of the above-mentioned reasons. Moreover, the results obtained in this paper can easily be extended to more general third-order differential equations with unbounded neutral coefficients to derive more general oscillation results. It is our belief that the present paper will contribute significantly to the study of oscillatory behavior of solutions of third-order neutral differential equations. In the sequel, all functional inequalities are supposed to hold eventually.

2. Main Results

We begin with the following lemmas that will play an important role in establishing our main results. For notational purposes, we let

where is a constant and is the inverse function of .

Lemma 1 (see [21]). Let the function satisfy , and eventually. Then, for every , eventually.

Lemma 2. Let conditions and be satisfied and assume that is an eventually positive solution of (1). Then for sufficiently large , either

(I), , , and ; or(II), , , and .

Proof. The proof is not difficult and so is omitted.

Theorem 3. In addition to conditions and , assume that there exists a function such that for . If for some constants , the two first-order delay differential equations

and

oscillate, then (1) oscillates.

Proof. Let be a nonoscillatory solution of (1). Since is also a solution of (1), without loss of generality, we may suppose that there exists a such that, for , , , and . It follows from Lemma 2 that satisfies either case or case .
Assume first that case holds. By virtue of the definition of , we conclude that

Taking into account and Lemma 1 with , we deduce that, for every ,

which yields

Hence, is nonincreasing for sufficiently large . It follows from and the monotonicities of and that

Using (8) in (5), we arrive at

and thus

Combining (1) and (10), we obtain

It follows now from (6) and (11) that

Letting , we have

and inequality (12) can be written as

Combining (13) and Lemma 1 with , we get, for every ,

and so

Using (16) in (14), we deduce that

Letting , we see that is a positive solution of the first-order delay differential inequality

Therefore, by [22, Theorem 1], we conclude that, for every , (3) has a positive solution, which contradicts the fact that (3) oscillates.
Next, suppose that case holds. Since is strictly decreasing and , we have

Using (19) in (5), we conclude that

and thus

Substitution of (21) into (1) implies that

Since , , , and , for , one can easily arrive at

By virtue of and the fact that is strictly increasing, we deduce that . Substitute and into (23) to obtain

Using (24) in (22), we get

Letting , we see that is a positive solution of the first-order delay differential inequality

The rest of the proof is similar to that of case and hence is omitted. This completes the proof.

From [23], it is well known that if

then the first-order delay differential equation

oscillates, where , , , and . Therefore, by virtue of Theorem 3, we have the following result.

Corollary 4. Let conditions and be satisfied and . Assume that there exists a function such that for . If for some constant ,

and

then (1) oscillates.

Corollary 5. Let conditions and be satisfied and . Assume that there exists a function such that for . If for some constant ,

and

then (1) oscillates.

Proof. Applications of (31), (32), and [24, Theorem 2] imply that (3) and (4) oscillate. Hence, by Theorem 3, (1) oscillates.

Next, we present the following interesting result for which we need to assume that the function in condition is nondecreasing.

Theorem 6. In addition to conditions and , assume that the function with is nondecreasing on . If for some constant ,

and

then (1) oscillates.

Proof. Let be a nonoscillatory solution of (1). Without loss of generality, we may suppose that there exists a such that, for , , , and . It follows from Lemma 2 that satisfies either case or case .
Assume that case holds. Proceeding as in the proof of Theorem 3, we deduce that (13), (14), and (16) hold for every . Integrating (14) from to , and letting , we obtain

Using (16) in (35), we conclude that

which yields

Using (13) and the fact that , we have

and so inequality (37) implies that

i.e.,

Taking as in (40), we obtain a contradiction to (33).
Next, let case hold. Then, we arrive at (22) and (23). For , we see that . Putting and into (23), we get

Integrating (22) from to and using (41), we obtain

which can be written as

Taking as in (43), we obtain a contradiction to (34). The proof is complete.

We conclude this paper with the following examples and remarks to illustrate the main results. The first example is concerned with the case where as , whereas the second example is concerned with the case where is a bounded function.

Example 7. Consider the sublinear Emden–Fowler neutral differential equation

where and are constants. Here , , , , , , and . Let . Then and condition (31) becomes

Letting , then and condition (32) reduces to

Therefore, by Corollary 5, (44) oscillates.

Example 8. Consider the linear differential equation

Here , , , , , and is a constant. It is easy to deduce that , , , and for some constant . Using in (33), we have

That is, condition (33) with holds.

Next, using in (34), we obtain

That is, condition (34) with holds. Therefore, by Theorem 6, (47) oscillates.

Remark 9. For a class of third-order Emden–Fowler delay differential equations with unbounded neutral coefficients (1), we established new oscillation criteria which complement and improve results in the cited papers because these criteria apply also in the case where is unbounded and ensure that all solutions of (1) are oscillatory (that is, these results can distinguish solutions with different behaviors).

Remark 10. Using different methods, we improve results of Li and Rogovchenko [2] by removing restrictive condition , which, in a certain sense, is a significant improvement compared to the results reported in the cited papers.

Remark 11. Combining Theorem 3 and the results obtained in [25], one can derive various oscillation criteria for (1) in the linear case. To study the oscillation of (1) in the superlinear case, it would be of interest to establish oscillation criteria for (3) and (4) assuming that .

Remark 12. In the conclusion of Lemma 1, the existence of the constant is necessary in some cases. For instance, for , if , then , , and , and so the function does not satisfy the conclusion of Lemma 1 provided that there is no . On the basis of Lemma 1, one can easily revisit the results reported in [26–28].

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

All five authors contributed equally to this work and are listed in alphabetical order. They all read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by NNSF of P. R. China (Grant No. 61503171), CPSF (Grant No. 2015M582091), and NSF of Shandong Province (Grant No. ZR2016JL021). The research of the third author is supported by the grant project KEGA 035TUKE-4/2017.

References

R. P. Agarwal, M. Bohner, T. Li, and C. Zhang, “Oscillation of second-order Emden-Fowler neutral delay differential equations,” Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata (1923 -), vol. 193, no. 6, pp. 1861–1875, 2014.

T. Li and Yu. V. Rogovchenko, “Asymptotic behavior of higher-order quasilinear neutral differential equations,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2014, Article ID 395368, 11 pages, 2014.

T. Li and Yu. V. Rogovchenko, “Oscillation of second-order neutral differential equations,” Mathematische Nachrichten, vol. 288, no. 10, pp. 1150–1162, 2015.

T. Li and Yu. V. Rogovchenko, “On asymptotic behavior of solutions to higher-order sublinear Emden-Fowler delay differential equations,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 67, pp. 53–59, 2017.

T. Li and Yu. V. Rogovchenko, “Oscillation criteria for second-order superlinear Emden-Fowler neutral differential equations,” Monatshefte für Mathematik, vol. 184, no. 3, pp. 489–500, 2017.

J. S. W. Wong, “On the generalized Emden-Fowler equation,” SIAM Review, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 339–360, 1975.

B. Baculíková and J. Džurina, “Oscillation of third-order neutral differential equations,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 52, no. 1-2, pp. 215–226, 2010.

B. Baculíková, B. Rani, S. Selvarangam, and E. Thandapani, “Properties of Kneser’s solution for half-linear third order neutral differential equations,” Acta Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 525–533, 2017.

Z. Došlá and P. Liška, “Oscillation of third-order nonlinear neutral differential equations,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 56, pp. 42–48, 2016.

J. Džurina, S. R. Grace, and I. Jadlovská, “On nonexistence of Kneser solutions of third-order neutral delay differential equations,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 88, pp. 193–200, 2019.

S. R. Grace, J. R. Graef, and M. A. El-Beltagy, “On the oscillation of third order neutral delay dynamic equations on time scales,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 775–782, 2012.

S. R. Grace, J. R. Graef, and E. Tunç, “Oscillatory behavior of a third-order neutral dynamic equation with distributed delays,” in Proceedings of the 10th Colloquium on the Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations, pp. 1–14, Szeged, Hungary, 2016.

S. R. Grace and I. Jadlovská, “Oscillatory behavior of odd-order nonlinear differential equations with a nonpositive neutral term,” Dynamic Systems and Applications, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 125–136, 2018.

T. S. Hassan and S. R. Grace, “Oscillation criteria for third order neutral nonlinear dynamic equations with distributed deviating arguments on time scales,” Tatra Mountains Mathematical Publications, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 141–161, 2014.

Y. Jiang, C. Jiang, and T. Li, “Oscillatory behavior of third-order nonlinear neutral delay differential equations,” Advances in Difference Equations, vol. 2016, Article ID 171, 12 pages, 2016.

T. Li and E. Thandapani, “Oscillation of solutions to odd-order nonlinear neutral functional differential equations,” Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 2011, Article ID 23, 12 pages, 2011.

B. Mihalíková and E. Kostiková, “Boundedness and oscillation of third order neutral differential equations,” Tatra Mountains Mathematical Publications, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 137–144, 2009.

J. R. Graef, E. Tunç, and S. R. Grace, “Oscillatory and asymptotic behavior of a third-order nonlinear neutral differential equation,” Opuscula Mathematica, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 839–852, 2017.

T. Li and C. Zhang, “Properties of third-order half-linear dynamic equations with an unbounded neutral coefficient,” Advances in Difference Equations, vol. 2013, Article ID 333, 8 pages, 2013.

E. Tunç, “Oscillatory and asymptotic behavior of third-order neutral differential equations with distributed deviating arguments,” Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 2017, Article ID 16, 12 pages, 2017.

I. T. Kiguradze and T. A. Chanturia, Asymptotic Properties of Solutions of Nonautonomous Ordinary Differential Equations, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1993, Translated from the 1985 Russian original.

Ch. G. Philos, “On the existence of nonoscillatory solutions tending to zero at ∞ for differential equations with positive delays,” Archiv der Mathematik, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 168–178, 1981, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01223686.

R. G. Koplatadze and T. A. Chanturiya, “Oscillating and monotone solutions of first-order differential equations with deviating argument,” Differentsial'nye Uravneniya, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1463–1465, 1472, 1982 (Russian).

Y. Kitamura and T. Kusano, “Oscillation of first-order nonlinear differential equations with deviating arguments,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 64–68, 1980.

G. E. Chatzarakis and T. Li, “Oscillation criteria for delay and advanced differential equations with nonmonotone arguments,” Complexity, vol. 2018, Article ID 8237634, 18 pages, 2018.

R. P. Agarwal, M. Bohner, T. Li, and C. Zhang, “A new approach in the study of oscillatory behavior of even-order neutral delay differential equations,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 225, pp. 787–794, 2013.

T. Li and Yu. V. Rogovchenko, “Oscillation criteria for even-order neutral differential equations,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 61, pp. 35–41, 2016.

E. Tunç and A. Kaymaz, “On oscillation of second-order linear neutral differential equations with damping term,” Dynamic Systems and Applications, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 289–301, 2019.