Case Reports in Dentistry
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 7318715, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7318715

Case Report

Early Orthopaedic Treatment of Hemifacial Microsomia

Diana Cassi, Marisabel Magnifico, Mauro Gandolfinini, Ilda Kasa, Giovanni Mauro, and Alberto Di Blasio

Section of Orthodontics, Centro Universitario di Odontoiatria, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Diana Cassi; diana.cassi@unipr.it

Received 4 August 2017; Accepted 1 October 2017; Published 14 December 2017

Academic Editor: Daniel Torrés-Lagares

Copyright © 2017 Diana Cassi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The aim of this paper is to report treatment effects of functional therapy in a growing patient affected by hemifacial microsomia (HM). According to Kaban’s classification, the patient was classified as grade IIa as she presented all mandibular and temporomandibular joint components and a normal shaped, hypoplastic mandible. The therapeutic approach included the use of an asymmetrical functional activator (AFA) to stimulate the growth of the affected side and consequently to improve symmetry of the mandible and maxillary deficiency. Further effects were the lengthening of the mandibular ramus, restoration of occlusion, and expansion of soft tissues.

1. Introduction

Hemifacial microsomia (HM) is a congenital craniofacial malformation caused by hypoplasia of anatomical structures deriving from the first and second branchial arches. As a result, HM involves facial skeleton, soft tissues, ear, and cranial nerves, thus resulting in the absence or insufficiency of these components [1]. Such a congenital malformation is also known as Goldenhar syndrome, craniofacial microsomia, first and second branchial arch syndrome, otomandibular dysostosis, and lateral facial dysplasia [2].

HM is the second most frequent craniofacial birth defect after cleft lip and palate. Reported incidence varies from 1 case every 3000 to 1 case every 5600 newborns [3].

Males and females are not equally affected: females are less frequently affected than males with an estimated ratio of 2 : 3. There is also a difference between the affected sides: a right malformation is more frequent than the left one (ratio: 3 : 2) [4].

Aetiology of this condition is uncertain although the majority of authors suggest the hypothesis of an early hemorrhage from the stapedial artery causing a hematoma in the supplied region. Thus, different phenotypical grades of dysmorphism may occur according to the degree of vascular damage.

Among various classification systems proposed, in the present article, we selected and used the classification proposed by Kaban [5], which distinguishes the following categories according to the severity of the anatomical anomalies:

 Type I: hypoplastic temporomandibular joint Type IIa: hypoplastic and abnormal shape of mandibular ramus, condyle, and temporomandibular joint Type IIb: mandibular ramus is hypoplastic and markedly abnormal in form and location, being medial and anterior Type III: absence of mandibular ramus Type IV: mandibular body hypoplasia

Treatment of patients depends on the degree of deformity of the facial structures and includes repair of bony asymmetry as well as of soft tissue defects and auricular anomalies [6].

The purpose of this report was to present a nonsurgical approach to treat a young girl affected by mild type IIa HM, using an asymmetrical functional activator (AFA).

2. Case Report

A 2-year-old girl was referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Department of Orthodontics of Parma University, Italy, for the evaluation and treatment of a facial deformity.

Facial examination showed an asymmetry with the typical three-dimensional deformity on the affected side: on the sagittal dimension, the chin was deviated from the midline; on the vertical plane, the mandibular border was cranially displaced; and on the transversal plane, the face resulted less expanded (Figure 1(a)). The left auricle was hypoplastic (Figure 2).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 1: Frontal photographs showing the progressive levelling of oral commissure during treatment and follow-up: (a) 2 years and 1 month; (b) 3 years and 11 months; (c) 4 years and 10 months; (d) 7 years and 8 months.

Figure 2: Left external ear malformed, with a rudimentary auricle.

Both condyles showed appropriate movements, and the maximum mouth opening was at normal range.

Computer tomography (CT) scan revealed a hypoplastic condyle and a deficiency in the ramus height on the affected side.

Intraoral examination highlighted the typical canting of the occlusal plane, as the reduction in ramus length created the condition for a vertical maxillary growth deficiency on the affected side.

Based on clinical and radiographic findings, a diagnosis of grade IIa HM according to Kaban classification was made.

Objectives of treatment planning were (1) to improve mandibular growth in the sagittal and vertical dimension, (2) to free the vertical maxillary growth on the affected side and to correct the occlusal plane canting, and (3) to improve the overall facial symmetry.

It was decided to delay a mandibular osteodistraction and to try a functional approach using an asymmetrical functional activator (AFA).

3. Description of the Appliance Design

The AFA has a “hybrid” design, being a combination of the two following functional appliances: biteblock components of the bionator and the vestibular shields of the Frankel appliance on the affected side (Figures 3 and 4).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 3: Asymmetrical functional activator (AFA): (a) and (c) lateral views; (b) frontal view.

(a)

(b)

Figure 4: Asymmetrical functional activator (AFA): (a) lower occlusal view; (b) upper occlusal view.

On the affected side, it is necessary to free the vertical growth of the maxilla, maintaining upper and lower teeth apart; thus, the ideal appliance is the Frankel I function regulator. This device maintains the vertical dimension by the means of the buccal shields, avoiding any occlusal contact. Allowing the passive vertical eruption of the upper teeth, the appliance corrects the occlusal plane canting. The soft tissue tension due to the buccal shields improves the stretching and lengthening of the soft tissues too. Buccal shields are supplied with a screw, which is progressively activated in order to increase the vertical dimension.

On the healthy side, an Andresen functional appliance is indicated both to avoid dental eruption and to guide the mandible in the therapeutical position improving the chin symmetry.

The acrylic and the wire elements contribute to create the correct setting for skeletal and dentoalveolar correction by forcing the mandible in the correct position in the three dimensions of the space.

4. Treatment Procedure and Results

An alginate impression was taken, and a construction wax bite was registered with the mandible in advanced and symmetric position in order to bring the chin to the midline and to correct the vertical height deficiency on the affected side.

The functional treatment with AFA began at the age of 4, and it was performed for 30 months with good compliance and nearly full-time wearing of the appliance. After this period, the patient showed a favourable response. Particularly, maxilla-mandibular growth on the malformed side developed sufficiently to reestablish normal occlusion and an almost complete facial symmetry, with levelling of the occlusal plane and oral commissure (Figures 1 and 5).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 5: Frontal photographs showing changes in position of the chin point during treatment and follow-up: (a) 2 years and 1 month; (b) 3 years and 11 months; (c) 4 years and 10 months; (d) 7 years and 8 months.

The treatment continued for another 6-month period with the patient wearing the appliance only by night. At the age of 7, the active therapy was interrupted, and the patient underwent regular follow-up twice a year in order to monitor facial growth and dental eruption. During this period, no additional orthodontic or surgical procedures were performed.

5. Discussion

Therapy of HM is still controversial, particularly with regard to the possibility of modifying skeletal discrepancy and of redirecting growth on the affected side with a functional approach [7, 8].

Successful treatment of facial asymmetry by functional appliances in the young child following early fracture of the mandibular condyle has extensively been reported [9–13]. Similarly, topics concerning the growth of the mandible and therapeutic approaches to influence it have been addressed in numerous clinical and experimental studies [14–17]. Based on these findings, patients with a recognizable condylar deformity, such as those in type I and IIa HM, might benefit from functional stimulation influencing condylar growth [18–20].

On the other hand, according to few authors, asymmetry tends to recur after orthopaedic treatment in subjects affected by true HM form, which may later require orthognathic surgical correction of skeletal deficiencies [21–23]. Conversely, long-term satisfactory results are more likely to be observed in abnormalities due to trauma, infections, or surgical iatrogenic deformities; these conditions are frequently misdiagnosed as HM, even though they are limited to the bony structure of the mandible without involvement of the soft tissue and neuromuscular pattern [24, 25].

The present case demonstrated a good outcome of functional appliance therapy in a growing patient with type IIa HM. Particularly, the use of the AFA seemed to induce a complete and balanced maxillary-mandibular growth and to be effective in terms of improvement of chin symmetry, occlusal plane, and oral commissure levelling.

Management of the occlusal canting is usually required both in orthodontic camouflage and presurgical orthodontic treatment of patients with HM: early orthopaedic intervention is focused on the differential control of teeth eruption between the opposing arches and the prevention or correction of dentoalveolar adaptation to the asymmetry; by contrast, after growth, the levelling of occlusal plane might require fixed appliances combined with the use of miniscrews [26–28].

Conceivably, the reported favourable result is related to the special conditions of the present case. In fact, the very early age, the excellent cooperation, and the timing of treatment may affect the success of the treatment of asymmetric facial growth [29, 30]. Early interceptive orthodontic treatment is frequently recommended both in children with craniofacial anomalies and in nonsyndromic patients for the positive effect on skeletal growth and dental development [31–34]; moreover, in growing subjects, it may improve nasal function and prevent the development of respiratory disorders [35–37] and of muscle function disturbances [38].

The long-term stability of facial aesthetic is demonstrated by photography, which is the standard means of documenting facial appearance [39]. However, three-dimensional (3D) techniques should be considered the ideal tool for assessment of craniofacial morphology in patients with skeletal asymmetry: compared to conventional two-dimensional representation, 3D evaluation overcomes problems in head positioning and may be used to quantify hard/soft tissue deficiency, as well as to monitor and measure the effects of both growth and treatment [40, 41]. Particularly, objective measurements of the skeletal response can be performed on pre- and posttreatment 3D computerised tomography (CT), documenting incremental growth of the mandible. Given the mild form of the present case, we chose not to perform such exam during the follow-up. Interestingly, noninvasive methods, such as laser surface scanner, stereophotogrammetry, or ultrasonographic measurements, are being intensively investigated in order to make a quantification of facial topography without ionising radiation [42–47].

As for other craniofacial malformations, the role of orthodontists is very important in the interdisciplinary management of patients with HM, especially in cases with mild mandibular and soft tissue deficiencies [48–52]. Problems related to facial appearance may cause severe psychosocial disturbances [53]; thus, improvement of patient aesthetic appearance is also part of treatment objectives [54].

Proper orthopaedic intervention in the early age may induce an improvement of aesthetics, function, and psychological aspects, reducing or even eliminating the need for maxillary and mandibular osteotomies in late adolescence.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

E. M. Ongkosuwito, J. W. van Neck, E. Wattel, L. N. van Adrichem, and A. M. Kuijpers-Jagtman, “Craniofacial morphology in unilateral hemifacial microsomia,” British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 902–907, 2013.

W. S. Fan, J. B. Mulliken, and B. L. Padwa, “An association between hemifacial microsomia and facial clefting,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 330–334, 2005.

W. C. Grabb, “The first and second branchial arch syndrome,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 485–508, 1965.

B. R. Rollnick, C. I. Kaye, K. Nagatoshi, W. Hauck, A. O. Martin, and J. F. Reynolds, “Oculoauriculovertebral dysplasia and variants: phenotypic characteristics of 294 patients,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 361–375, 1987.

J. E. Murray, L. B. Kaban, and J. B. Mulliken, “Analysis and treatment of hemifacial microsomia,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 186–199, 1984.

K. A. Brandstetter and K. G. Patel, “Craniofacial microsomia,” Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 495–515, 2016.

R. Leonardi and E. Barbato, “Mandibular asymmetry treated with a modified activator appliance,” Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 939–943, 2007.

E. M. Ongkosuwito, J. van Vooren, J. W. van Neck et al., “Changes of mandibular ramal height, during growth in unilateral hemifacial microsomia patients and unaffected controls,” Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 92–97, 2013.

W. R. Proffit, K. W. Vig, and T. A. Turvey, “Early fracture of the mandibular condyles: frequently an unsuspected cause of growth disturbances,” American Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 1980.

E. Bruckmoser and G. Undt, “Management and outcome of condylar fractures in children and adolescents: a review of the literature,” Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. S86–S106, 2012.

C. K. Liu, F. W. Meng, X. Y. Tan et al., “Clinical and radiological outcomes after treatment of sagittal fracture of mandibular condyle (SFMC) by using occlusal splint in children,” British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 144–148, 2014.

Y. M. Zhao, J. Yang, R. C. Bai, L. H. Ge, and Y. Zhang, “A retrospective study of using removable occlusal splint in the treatment of condylar fracture in children,” Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1078–1082, 2014.

D. Cassi, M. Magnifico, C. Di Blasio, M. Gandolfini, and A. Di Blasio, “Functional treatment of a child with extracapsular mandibular fracture,” Case Report in Dentistry, vol. 2017, Article ID 9760789, 5 pages, 2017.

D. Xenakis, O. Rönning, T. Kantomaa, and H. Helenius, “Reactions of the mandible to experimentally induced asymmetrical growth of the maxilla in the rat,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 1995.

P. Cozza, T. Baccetti, L. Franchi, L. De Toffol, and J. A. McNamara, “Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, vol. 129, no. 5, pp. 599.e1–599.e12, 2006.

A. Di Blasio, D. Cassi, C. Di Blasio, and M. Gandolfini, “Temporomandibular joint dysfunction in Moebius syndrome,” European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 295–298, 2014.

C. Di Blasio, A. Di Blasio, G. Pedrazzi, M. Anghinoni, and E. Sesenna, “How does the mandible grow after early high condylectomy?” Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 764–771, 2015.

A. Silvestri, G. Natali, and G. Iannetti, “Functional therapy in hemifacial microsomia: therapeutic protocol for growing children,” Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 271–280, 1996.

R. R. J. Cousley and M. L. Calvert, “Current concepts in the understanding and management of hemifacial microsomia,” British Journal of Plastic Surgery, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 536–551, 1997.

B. Kahl-Nieke and R. Fischbach, “Effect of early orthopedic intervention on hemifacial microsomia patients: an approach to a cooperative evaluation of treatment results,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 538–550, 1998.

M. L. Anghinoni, A. S. Magri, A. Di Blasio, L. Toma, and E. Sesenna, “Midline mandibular osteotomy in an asymmetric patient,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 1008–1014, 2009.

B. Brevi, A. Di Blasio, C. Di Blasio, F. Piazza, L. D’Ascanio, and E. Sesenna, “Which cephalometric analysis for maxillo-mandibular surgery in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome?” Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 332–337, 2015.

G. Zanardi, E. V. Parente, L. S. Esteves, R. S. Louro, and J. Capelli, “Orthodontic and surgical treatment of a patient with hemifacial microsomia,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, vol. 141, no. 4, pp. S130–S139, 2012.

M. C. Meazzini, R. Brusati, A. Caprioglio et al., “True hemifacial microsomia and hemimandibular hypoplasia with condylar-coronoid collapse: diagnostic and prognostic differences,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, vol. 139, no. 5, pp. e435–e447, 2011.

M. C. Meazzini, R. Brusati, P. Diner et al., “The importance of a differential diagnosis between true hemifacial microsomia and pseudo-hemifacial microsomia in the post-surgical long-term prognosis,” Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 10–16, 2011.

B. G. Maino, P. Pagin, and A. Di Blasio, “Success of miniscrews used as anchorage for orthodontic treatment: analysis of different factors,” Progress in Orthodontics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 202–209, 2012.

E. Mizrahi, “The use of miniscrews in orthodontics: a review of selected clinical applications,” Primary Dental Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 20–27, 2016.

R. R. J. Cousley and P. J. Sandler, “Advances in orthodontic anchorage with the use of mini-implant techniques,” British Dental Journal, vol. 218, no. 3, p. E4, 2015.

B. Melsen, J. Bjerregaard, and M. Bundgaard, “The effect of treatment with functional appliance on a pathologic growth pattern of the condyle,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 503–512, 1986.

W. K. Seow, S. Urban, N. Vafaie, and S. Shusterman, “Morphometric analysis of the primary and permanent dentitions in hemifacial microsomia: a controlled study,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 27–38, 1998.

D. Cassi, A. Di Blasio, M. Gandolfinini, M. Magnifico, F. Pellegrino, and M. G. Piancino, “Dentoalveolar effects of early orthodontic treatment in patients with cleft lip and palate,” Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 2021–2026, 2017.

A. Caprioglio, C. Bergamini, L. Franchi et al., “Prediction of Class II improvement after rapid maxillary expansion in early mixed dentition,” Progress in Orthodontics, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 9, 2017.

A. Caprioglio, R. Fastuca, P. A. Zecca et al., “Cellular midpalatal suture changes after rapid maxillary expansion in growing subjects: a case report,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 615, 2017.

M. Magnifico, A. Di Blasio, D. Cassi, C. Di Blasio, and M. Gandolfini, “Asymmetric expansion with a modified quad helix for treatment of isolated crossbite,” Case Report in Dentistry, vol. 2017, Article ID 7275846, 5 pages, 2017.

R. Fastuca, P. Lorusso, M. O. Lagravère et al., “Digital evaluation of nasal changes induced by rapid maxillary expansion with different anchorage and appliance design,” BMC Oral Health, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 113, 2017.

R. Fastuca, G. Perinetti, P. A. Zecca, R. Nucera, and A. Caprioglio, “Airway compartments volume and oxygen saturation changes after rapid maxillary expansion: a longitudinal correlation study,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 955–961, 2015.

R. Fastuca, M. Meneghel, P. A. Zecca et al., “Multimodal airway evaluation in growing patients after rapid maxillary expansion,” European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 129–134, 2015.

K. Biondi, P. Lorusso, R. Fastuca et al., “Evaluation of masseter muscle in different vertical skeletal patterns in growing patients,” European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2016.

C. B. Birgfeld, C. L. Heike, B. S. Saltzman, B. G. Leroux, K. N. Evans, and D. V. Luquetti, “Reliable classification of facial phenotypic variation in craniofacial microsomia: a comparison of physical exam and photographs,” Head and Face Medicine, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 14, 2016.

S. Adibah, R. Ahmad, S. Mohd et al., “Reproducibility and reliability of three-dimensional soft tissue landmark identification using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1–12, 2015.

D. Cassi, C. De Biase, I. Tonni, M. Gandolfini, A. Di Blasio, and M. G. Piancino, “Natural position of the head: review of two-dimensional and three-dimensional methods of recording,” British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 233–240, 2016.

J. M. Plooij, G. R. J. Swennen, F. A. Rangel et al., “Evaluation of reproducibility and reliability of 3D soft tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 267–273, 2009.

T. J. Verhoeven, C. Coppen, R. Barkhuysen et al., “Three dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry after mandibular reconstruction: validation of a new method using stereophotogrammetry,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 19–25, 2013.

S. A. Othman, R. Ahmad, S. M. Asi, N. H. Ismail, and Z. A. A. Rahman, “Three-dimensional quantitative evaluation of facial morphology in adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate, and patients without clefts,” British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 208–213, 2014.

P. A. Zecca, R. Fastuca, M. Beretta, A. Caprioglio, and A. Macchi, “Correlation assessment between three-dimensional facial soft tissue scan and lateral cephalometric radiography in orthodontic diagnosis,” International Journal of Dentistry, vol. 2016, Article ID 1473918, 8 pages, 2016.

A. Baysal, A. O. Sahan, M. A. Ozturk, and T. Uysal, “Reproducibility and reliability of three-dimensional soft tissue landmark identification using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 1004–1009, 2016.

A. Di Blasio, C. Di Blasio, G. Pedrazzi et al., “Combined photographic and ultrasonographic measurement of the ANB angle: a pilot study,” Oral Radiology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 212–218, 2017.

K. W. L. Vig and A. M. Mercado, “Overview of orthodontic care for children with cleft lip and palate, 1915-2015,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 543–556, 2015.

B. Bianchi, A. Ferri, B. Brevi et al., “Orthognathic surgery for the complete rehabilitation of Moebius patients: principles, timing and our experience,” Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. e1–e4, 2013.

D. Cassi, A. Di Blasio, and M. Gandolfini, “Determination of vertical dimension in prosthodontic rehabilitation of a growing patient with severe oligodontia,” European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 61–64, 2015.

M. Magnifico, D. Cassi, I. Kasa, M. Di Blasio, A. Di Blasio, and M. Gandolfini, “Pre- and postsurgical orthodontics in patients with moebius syndrome,” Case Report in Dentistry, vol. 2017, Article ID 1484065, 6 pages, 2017.

M. Z. Handler, O. Alabi, and J. Miller, “Unusual presentation of hemifacial microsomia,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. e306–e308, 2011.

A. Di Blasio, G. Mandelli, I. Generali, and M. Gandolfini, “Facial aesthetics and childhood,” European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 131–134, 2009.

J. Ohtani, W. Y. Hoffman, K. Vargervik, and S. Oberoi, “Team management and treatment outcomes for patients with hemifacial microsomia,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, vol. 141, no. 4, pp. S74–S81, 2012.