Case Reports in Dermatological Medicine

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 149829, 3 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/149829

Case Report

A Dermal Piercing Complicated by Mycobacterium fortuitum

Trisha Patel, Leslie Scroggins-Markle, and Brent Kelly

The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555, USA

Received 11 June 2013; Accepted 28 July 2013

Academic Editors: S. A. Cuevas-Covarrubias, K. Jimbow, and N. Oiso

Copyright © 2013 Trisha Patel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Background. Dermal piercings have recently become a fashion symbol. Common complications include hypertrophic scarring, rejection, local infection, contact allergy, and traumatic tearing. We report a rare case of Mycobacterium fortuitum following a dermal piercing and discuss its medical implications and treatments. Case. A previously healthy 19-year-old woman presented complaining of erythema and edema at the site of a dermal piercing on the right fourth dorsal finger. She was treated with a 10-day course of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and one course of cephalexin by her primary care physician with incomplete resolution. The patient stated that she had been swimming at a local water park daily. A punch biopsy around the dermal stud was performed, and cultures with sensitivities revealed Mycobacterium fortuitum. The patient was treated with clarithromycin and ciprofloxacin for two months receiving full resolution. Discussion. Mycobacterium fortuitum is an infrequent human pathogen. This organism is a Runyon group IV, rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria, often found in water, soil, and dust. Treatment options vary due to the size of the lesion. Small lesions are typically excised, while larger lesions require treatment for 2–6 months with antibiotics. We recommend a high level of suspicion for atypical mycobacterial infections in a piercing resistant to other therapies.

1. Introduction

Mycobacterium fortuitum is a Runyon group IV, rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria, often found in water (even municipal water systems), soil, and dust [1–5]. The portals of entry into humans include inhalation, mucosal, and via skin penetration [6]. Once it is has entered, it can cause respiratory infections, lymphadenitis, and skin/soft tissue infections, and in immunocompromised patients, it can lead to dissemination [5, 7]. Most common infections are cutaneous, usually associated with trauma or surgical procedures including liposuction, silicon injection, subcutaneous injections, acupuncture, and breast implants [3, 5, 7–10].

We report a case of M. fortuitum following a dermal piercing and discuss its medical implications and treatment. We also discuss other similar piercing infections caused by M. fortuitum and related mycobacteria.

2. Case Report

A previously healthy 19-year-old Hispanic woman presented to our university-associated dermatology practice complaining of erythema, edema, and drainage at the site of a dermal piercing on the right fourth dorsal finger. The piercing was placed two months prior at a local piercing shop and became symptomatic approximately two weeks after she had received the piercing. She was treated with a 10-day course of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and one course of cephalexin by her primary care physician with incomplete resolution. She did admit to swimming at a local water park daily. She was otherwise asymptomatic.

On physical exam, the right fourth dorsal finger had 1.5 cm × 1 cm erythema and edema with tenderness to palpation. No drainage was appreciated (Figure 1). A 4 mm punch biopsy around the dermal stud was performed. The entire specimen was sent for tissue culture. At day four of culture, growth of atypical mycobacteria was observed, and by day 28, identification of growth and sensitivity was completed. Cultures grew 2+ Mycobacterium fortuitum, which was susceptible to amikacin, clarithromycin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Management included clarithromycin 500 mg by mouth twice daily and ciprofloxacin 500 mg by mouth once daily. After two months, full resolution of nodules was noted (Figure 2).

Figure 1: M. fortuitum. Clinical picture of dermal piercing site at the time of infection.

Figure 2: M. fortuitum. Clinical picture of dermal piercing site after full treatment; scar formation present from biopsy site.

3. Discussion

Dermal piercings, also known as microdermal piercings, dermal anchoring, or “skin divers,” have recently become a fashion symbol. With only a stud visible on the skin surface, an “anchor” is placed just under the skin into the subcutaneous adipose and held in place by a metal plate. The anchor is placed into the layer of fat via an opening made with a dermal punch or large bore needle. The plate is then slid into place, and the stud is screwed on top. Common complications include keloid/hypertrophic scarring, rejection (less with titanium compared with other metals), local infection, endocarditis, communicable diseases, contact allergy, bleeding, migration, and traumatic tearing [9, 11].

Mycobacterium fortuitum is an infrequent human pathogen [1]. In culture, it can be detected within seven days along with other rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria including M. abscessus and M. chelonae [1, 5, 12]. The clinical appearance of cutaneous M. fortuitum can vary, but most often appears as pustules, hyperkeratotic plaques, nodules with or without suppuration, a sporotrichoid pattern, or ulcers with draining sinuses [6]. Diagnosis is often made histologically with culture for confirmation. Histological appearance of M. fortuitum includes mixed acute and chronic granulomatous inflammation and is commonly presented with microabscess formation. Acid-fast organisms can be sparse and are not always seen [1].

Treatment options vary due to the size of the lesion. Small lesions can be excised [6]. Larger lesions must be treated according to sensitivities to antibiotics followed by excision. M. fortuitum is typically resistant to most antituberculous drugs, but has sensitivity to amikacin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, erythromycin, cefoxitin, doxycycline, and imipenem [1, 6]. It is recommended to use multiple drugs to reduce development of resistance. The recommended duration of treatment can vary but a duration of 2 to 6 months is usually needed.

Other cases reporting of piercings associated with M. fortuitum include a 29-year-old female with bilateral breast abscesses mimicking carcinoma following bilateral nipple piercings, a 17-year-old female with bilateral breast abscesses following nipple piercings, and an 18-year-old female with a cheek abscess following a tragus piercing [12–14]. Other reported cases of atypical mycobacterial infected piercings include a 17-year-old female with nipple piercings who became infected with M. abscessus, a 22-year-old female with a navel piercing who became infected with M. chelonae, a 12-year-old female with an eyebrow piercing who became infected with M. flavescens, and a 35-year-old female with nipple piercings who became infected with M. holsaticum, M. agri, and M. brumae [11, 13].

4. Conclusion

We present a case of a dermal piercing of the finger complicated by M. fortuitum infection. It is possible that our patient was contaminated by piercing instruments or the jewelry, but it is also highly possible that she contracted the infection at the local swimming park or had prior skin inoculation. While we are unsure of the route of contamination, what is evident is that body piercings are continuing to become popular, readily available, and increasingly complex. As dermatologists, it is essential that we remain knowledgeable of what these piercings entail, as we are likely to see the complications of such piercings. Several recent case reports suggest that this as an emerging complication. A high index of suspicion should be maintained for atypical mycobacterial infection in a piercing resistant to other therapies; tissue cultures to evaluate for fungal and mycobacterial infections should be considered.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

D. S. Behroozan, M. M. Christian, and R. L. Moy, “Mycobacterium fortuitum infection following neck liposuction: a case report,” Dermatologic Surgery, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 588–590, 2000.

R. Fischeder, R. Schulze-Röbbecke, and A. Weber, “Occurrence of mycobacteria in drinking water samples,” Zentralblatt fur Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, vol. 192, no. 2, pp. 154–158, 1991.

J. Haiavy and H. Tobin, “Mycobacterium fortuitum infection in prosthetic breast implants,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 2124–2128, 2002.

K. L. Winthrop, M. Abrams, M. Yakrus et al., “An outbreak of mycobacterial furunculosis associated with footbaths at a nail salon,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 346, no. 18, pp. 1366–1371, 2002.

G. L. Woods and J. A. Washington II, “Mycobacteria other than Mycobacterium tuberculosis: review of microbiologic and clinical aspects,” Reviews of Infectious Diseases, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 275–294, 1987.

P. Kullavanijaya, “Atypical mycobacterial cutaneous infection,” Clinics in Dermatology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 153–158, 1999.

A. Guevara-Patino, M. S. de Mora, A. Farreras, I. Rivera-Olivero, D. Fermin, and J. H. de Waard, “Soft tissue infection due to Mycobacterium fortuitum following acupuncture: a case report and review of the literature,” Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 521–525, 2010.

D. R. G. Devi, V. A. Indumathi, S. Indira, P. R. S. Babu, D. Sridharan, and M. R. S. Belwadi, “Injection site abscess due to Mycobacterium fortuitum: a case report,” Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 133–134, 2003.

L. P. Fox, A. S. Geyer, S. Husain, P. Della-Latta, and M. E. Grossman, “Mycobacterium abscessus cellulitis and multifocal abscesses of the breasts in a transsexual from illicit intramammary injections of silicone,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 450–454, 2004.

R. J. Wallace Jr, J. M. Swenson, V. A. Silcox, R. C. Good, J. A. Tschen, and M. S. Stone, “Spectrum of disease due to rapidly growing mycobacteria,” Reviews of Infectious Diseases, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 657–679, 1983.

T. Ferringer, H. Pride, and W. Tyler, “Body piercing complicated by atypical mycobacterial infections,” Pediatric Dermatology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 219–222, 2008.

C. G. Lewis, M. K. Wells, and W. C. Jennings, “Mycobacterium fortuitum breast infection following nipple-piercing, mimicking carcinoma,” Breast Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 363–365, 2004.

V. Bengualid, V. Singh, H. Singh, and J. Berger, “Mycobacterium Fortuitum and anaerobic breast abscess following nipple piercing: case presentation and review of the literature,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 530–532, 2008.

K. A. Horii and M. A. Jackson, “Images in clinical medicine. Piercing-related nontuberculous mycobacterial infection,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, no. 21, article 2012, 2010.