Case Reports in Medicine

Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 646525, 4 pages

doi:10.1155/2012/646525

Case Report

Endoscopic Aspects of Gastric Syphilis

Mariana Souza Varella Frazão, Thiago Guimarães Vilaça, Fred Olavo Aragão Andrade Carneiro, Kengo Toma, Carolina Eliane Reina-Forster, Elisa Ryoka Baba, Spencer Cheng, Thiago Ferreira de Souza, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura, and Paulo Sakai

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit of the Hospital of Clinics of the University of São Paulo Medical School, Avenue Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255 6° Andar do Prédio dos Ambulatórios, Cerqueira César, CEP 05403-000, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Received 28 April 2012; Accepted 15 July 2012

Academic Editor: Abhay R. Satoskar

Copyright © 2012 Mariana Souza Varella Frazão et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Introduction. Considered as a rare event, gastric syphilis (GS) is reported as an organic form of involvement. Low incidence of GS emphasizes the importance of histopathological analysis. Objective. We aim to characterize GS endoscopic aspects in an immunocompetent patient. Case Report. A 23-year-old man presented with epigastric pain associated with nausea, anorexia, generalized malaise and 11 kg weight loss that started 1 month prior to his clinical consultation. Physical examination was normal except for mild abdominal tenderness in epigastrium. Endoscopy observed diminished gastric expandability and diffuse mucosal lesions, from cardia to pylorus. Gastric mucosa was thickened, friable, with nodular aspect, and associated with ulcers lesions. Gastric biopsies were performed, and histopathological analysis resulted in dense inflammatory infiltration rich in plasmocytes. Syphilis serologies were positive for VDRL and Treponema pallidum reagents. Immunohistochemical tests were positive for Treponema pallidum and CD138. The patient was treated with penicillin, leading to resolution of his clinical complaints and endoscopic findings. Conclusion. Diagnosis suspicion of GS is important in view of its nonspecific presentation. Patients with gastric symptoms that mimic neoplastic disease should be investigated thoroughly based on the fact that clinical, endoscopic, and histological findings can easily be mistaken for lymphoma or plastic linitis.

1. Introduction

The first reports of syphilis occurred in the 15th century as a sexually transmitted disease. In the early 20th century, it was considered a relevant etiology in neurological and cardiovascular disorders with an increased incidence [1].

From the decade of 50, the advent of penicillin as well as public health measures provided a reduction in disease carriers. A new increase in reported cases was observed in the 80s, after the arise of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome [1].

Syphilis can be divided into three clinical stages that guide its treatment [1].

Although considered a rare event, gastric syphilis (GS) is reported as a form of organic involvement. Andral et al., in 1834, were pioneers by reporting two suspected cases of GS [2]. Other studies, in the next century, described a high incidence of GS diagnosis based on clinical, serological, and radiological evidences [3, 4].

GS first case with histopathological confirmation in surgical specimen was reported by Graham [5]. Later, autopsy studies observed a lower incidence of GS, emphasizing the importance of histopathological analysis [6, 7].

2. Objective

We aim to characterize GS endoscopic aspects in an immunocompetent patient.

3. Case Report

A 23-year-old non-Caucasian man presented with epigastric pain associated with nausea, postprandial vomiting, anorexia, generalized malaise, and 11 kg weight loss that started 1 month prior to his clinical consultation at Internal Medicine Department of Clinics Hospital of Sao Paulo University.

He had no other important symptoms, and his personal and family antecedents for gastrointestinal disorders, abdominal surgery, other diseases, or previous hospitalization were negative. Physical examination was normal except for mild abdominal tenderness in epigastrium.

Upper endoscopy observed diminished gastric expandability and diffuse mucosal lesions, from cardia to pylorus. Gastric mucosa was thickened, friable, with nodular aspect, and associated with ulcers lesions (Figure 1). Gastric biopsies were performed, and histopathological analysis resulted in dense inflammatory infiltration rich in plasmocytes (Figure 2).

Figure 1: Gastric endoscopic aspects before treatment.

(a)

(b)

Figure 2: Histopathological study with dense inflammatory infiltration rich in plasmocytes and immunohistochemical test positive for Treponema pallidum.

Laboratory investigations revealed normal hemoglobin, hematocrit, white blood cell count, and liver and kidney function. Serology for HIV was negative. Syphilis serologies were positive for VDRL and Treponema pallidum reagents.

Based on laboratory and endoscopic findings, the possibility of GS was raised, and further investigation proceeded with immunohistochemical tests, which were positive for Treponema pallidum and CD138 (Figure 2).

The patient was treated with 2.400.000 UI dose of penicillin, leading to resolution of his clinical complaints and endoscopic findings (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Gastric endoscopic aspects two months after treatment.

4. Discussion

The most common symptoms of GS are epigastric pain, anorexia, early satiety, nausea, vomiting, and weight loss [8, 9]. Physical examination frequently does not contribute to the diagnosis [10].

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding often occurs in early stage of disease since that later stage is characterized by being devoid of blood supply to mucosa due to an endarteritis obliterans process. Gastric perforation and obstruction are rare but of serious complications [11–13].

A systematic review published in 2010 showed that the majority of patients with GS had no clinical history (87%) or physical examination (56%) compatible with syphilis. Based on that, proper association between medical and sexual history, physical examination, and especially the high degree of suspicion is required for diagnosis, in view of its difficulty and imprecision [10].

Syphilis serologies are often positive and correlated with the stage of infection. Serological tests include nonspecific and specific [14]. Nonspecific tests are VDRL (venereal disease research laboratory) and RPR (rapid plasma reagin). Specifics tests are FTA-Abs (fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption), TPHA (treponema pallidum haemagglutination test), and ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), in which they use T. pallidum antigens [15].

Upper endoscopy usually reveals a diminished gastric expandability. Other findings include mucosal edema, enanthema, friability, erosions, superficial ulcers, nodularity, and hypertrophy of gastric folds [16–22]. Differential diagnoses include lymphoma, plastic linitis, tuberculosis,tic and Crohn’s disease [23–27].

Histopathological analysis are compatible with endovasculitis, which includes arterial wall and submucosal layer thickening, perivascular cell infiltrate, diffuse lymphocytic, and plasmocytes infiltrate [8]. Vasculitis, manifested by endarteritis or endophlebitis, is a typical finding in other sites but is rarely observed in gastric samples, probably because endoscopic biopsies do not reach submucosal layer [28].

A finding of chronic inflammatory process similar to what is described the described suggests that syphilis should be investigated as a potential cause [8]. Hematoxylin-eosin analysis may indicate, but does not confirm, diagnosis because Treponema pallidum is not identified in this method. In these cases, more specific tests such as immunofluorescence are needed [28].

In summary, diagnosis suspicion of GS is extremely important in view of its nonspecific presentation. Young patients with gastric symptoms that mimic neoplastic disease should be investigated thoroughly based on the fact that clinical, endoscopic, and histological findings can easily be mistaken for lymphoma or plastic linitis.

References

E. W. Hook III and C. M. Marra, “Acquired syphilis in adults,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 326, no. 16, pp. 1060–1069, 1992.

C. B. Morton, “Syphilis of the stomach,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 880–889, 1932.

R. L. Sexton, R. E. Dunkley, and A. F. Kreglow, “Gastroscopic study of 100 cases of early syphilis,” Transactions of the American Therapeutic Society, vol. 37, pp. 73–77, 1937.

J. A. Hartwell, “Syphilis of the stomach: a critical review of reported cases from the pathological and clinical viewpoints,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 767–790, 1925.

E. A. Graham, “Surgical treatment of syphilis of the stomach,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 449–456, 1922.

D. Symmers, “Anatomic lesions in late acquired syphilis: a study of 314 cases based on the analysis of 4880 necropsies at Bellevue Hospital,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 66, no. 19, pp. 1457–1465, 1916.

H. A. Singer and K. A. Meyer, “Syphilis of the stomach with special reference to its incidence,” Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 48, pp. 23–29, 1929.

T. Fujisaki, M. Tatewaki, and J. Fujisaki, “A case of gastric syphilis,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 6, no. 7, p. A34, 2008.

D. B. Greenstein, C. M. Wilcox, and D. A. Schwartz, “Gastric syphilis: report of seven cases and review of the literature,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 4–9, 1994.

E. E. Mylona, I. G. Baraboutis, V. Papastamopoulos et al., “Gastric syphilis: a systematic review of published cases of the last 50 years,” Sexually Transmitted Diseases, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 177–183, 2010.

H. A. Winters, V. Notar-Francesco, K. Bromberg et al., “Gastric syphilis: five recent cases and a review of the literature,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 314–319, 1992.

W. P. Vaughan, F. H. Straus II, and D. Paloyan, “Squamous carcinoma of the stomach after luetic linitis plastica,” Gastroenterology, vol. 72, no. 5, part 1, pp. 945–948, 1977.

M. E. Morin and A. Tan, “Diffuse enlargement of gastric folds as a manifestation of secondary syphilis,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 170–172, 1980.

L. Gwanzura, A. Latif, M. Bassett, R. Machekano, D. A. Katzenstein, and P. R. Mason, “Syphilis serology and HIV infection in Harare, Zimbabwe,” Sexually Transmitted Infections, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 426–430, 1999.

S. Lautenschlager, “Cutaneous manifestations of syphilis: recognition and management,” American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 291–304, 2006.

R. A. Abdu, K. Carter, and W. J. Pomidor, “Gastric syphilis mimicking linitis plastica,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 103–104, 1993.

B. W. Long, J. H. Johnston, W. Wetzel, R. H. Flowers, and A. Haick, “Gastric syphilis: endoscopic and histological features mimicking lymphoma,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 90, no. 9, pp. 1504–1507, 1995.

H. Anai, Y. Okada, K. Okubo, T. Okamura, et al., “Gastric syphilis simulating linitis plastica type of gastric cancer,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 624–626, 1990.

J. C. Prolla, S. Kobayashi, Y. Yoshii, Y. Yamaoka, and T. Kasugai, “Diagnostic cytology of the stomach in gastric syphilis: report of two cases,” Acta Cytologica, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 333–337, 1970.

A. C. Reid and P. O. Behan, “Subacute Wernicke's encephalopathy due to gastric syphilis,” British Journal of Venereal Diseases, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 309–311, 1981.

M. B. Smith and T. N. Levin, “Gastric syphilis: an unusual endoscopic appearance,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 94–96, 1992.

H. D. Manten and A. M. Harary, “Chronic infections of the stomach,” in Gastroenterology, H. L. Bockus, Ed., vol. 2, pp. 1328–1343, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 4th edition, 1985.

C. Besses, J. Sans-Sabrafen, X. Badia, F. Rodriguez-Mendez, J. C. Salord, and J. R. Armengol, “Ulceroinfiltrative syphilitic gastropathy: silver stain diagnosis from biopsy specimen,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 82, no. 8, pp. 773–774, 1987.

J. W. Beckman and B. M. Schuman, “Antral gastritis and ulceration in a patient with secondary syphilis,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 355–356, 1986.

A. B. Moore and J. R. Aurelius, “Roentgenologic manifestation in eighty-seven cases of gastric syphilis,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 19, pp. 425–432, 1928.

B. V. Jones and J. E. Lichtenstein, “Gastric syphilis: radiologic findings,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 59–61, 1993.

M. Cecilia, Gastrointestinal Pathology, An Atlas and Text, Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2nd edition, 1999.

C. Y. Chen, K. H. Chi, R. W. George et al., “Diagnosis of gastric syphilis by direct immunofluorescence staining and real-time PCR testing,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 3452–3456, 2006.