Ectopic brain anaplastic ependymomas with no connection to the ventricles are rare. We present a rare case of a 25-year-old male who presented with generalized convulsions. Computed tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) showed characters of an intra- and extra-axial lesion. Intraoperatively, the lesion was a cortical solid mass that had no connections to the dura or to the ventricle. The histological diagnosis showed an anaplastic ependymoma with WHO grade III with distinctive desmoplasia. A literature review of ectopic anaplastic ependymomas regarding their clinical presentations, management, and prognostic factors was performed. There is a need to establish a clinically based histopathological grading system for anaplastic ependymomas. Ectopic anaplastic ependymomas should be included in the preoperative differential diagnosis.
Ependymomas are a subtype of glioma that arise from the ependymal cells within the ventricles and the central canal of the spinal cord. These types of tumors account for 1.9% of all primary CNS tumors [
Ependymomas arising outside of the ventricles and that do not have any connections to the ventricles specially cortical ependymomas are very rare [
Anaplastic ependymomas account for 8.6% to 11.5% of all ependymomas [
We present a rare case of a cortical anaplastic ependymoma that preoperatively was not typical for intra-axial or extra-axial lesion. We reviewed all cases of ectopic anaplastic ependymomas without connections to the ventricles in the literature to gather information regarding their sites, clinical presentations, pathological features, management, and outcomes.
A right-handed 25-year-old male presented with a generalized convulsion. He reported having focal-like seizures for years without treatment. He reported slight numbness in his left fourth and fifth fingers. No other symptoms or neurological deficits were present.
The initial brain CT revealed a mass in the right central area that appeared to be a meningioma. An MRI 3-Tesla scan of the brain demonstrated a solid, well-demarcated homogeneous mass which may have a dural attachment (Figure
Preoperative MRI showing the mass in the right frontal lobe.
A frontoparietal craniotomy was performed with MRI-guided navigational assistance. Grossly, the lesion was a cortical firm, gray, and solid mass with no connection to the dura matter. The gross lesion appearance and separation from the dural matter allowed for clear planes of dissection between the tumor and normal brain tissue. Intraoperatively, the tumor was not found to be connected to the ventricle. A gross total resection of the mass was achieved. Postoperatively, the patient had no deficits. The preoperative light numbness in his left hand improved during the hospital stay. After diagnosis of an anaplastic ependymoma, an MRI of the total neural axis was performed, without evidence of droop metastasis.
On histological examination, the tumor was primarily of high cellularity and had sharp borders with the surrounding CNS tissue, in which piloid gliosis with rosenthal fibers was seen. The tumor cells were diffusely distributed with little fibrillary intercellular substance. The tumor cell nuclei had finely dispersed chromatin with moderate anisonucleosis and some giant nuclei. Mitotic activity was increased, with up to four mitotic figures seen per high-power field, 11/10 hpf. In fields of lower cellular density, perivascular pseudorosettes were seen. Gemistocytic cells and calcifications were distributed throughout the tumor tissue. Focally, the tumor tissue contained many collagenous fibers.
Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells expressed GFAP, S100, and vimentin. An anti-EMA reaction showed dot-like staining of the microlumina. CD34 was only expressed in the endothelial cells. Thirty percent (30%) of the tumor cell nuclei showed a positive anti-Ki67 reaction.
On electron microscopy, some microlumina and remnants of cilia were detected (Figures
A patternless, highly cellular lesion is seen with increased mitotic activity (H&E, ×200, original magnification).
Sheets of monomorphic cells were interrupted by perivascular pseudorosettes (H&E, ×200, original magnification).
Paranuclear and ring-like structures were seen in the anti-EMA reaction (anti-EMA, ABC, ×200, original magnification).
Tumor cell processes were GFAP-positive and built up perivascular pseudorosettes (anti-GFAP, ABC, ×200, original magnification).
Ki67-index was increased, with up to 30% positive nuclei (anti-Ki67, ABC, ×200, original magnification).
The final diagnosis was an anaplastic ependymoma with WHO grade III and distinctive desmoplasia (Figures
Follow-up at 6 months revealed that the patient had well-controlled epileptic seizure activity, and an MRI of the brain showed no evidence of residual tumor or tumor recurrence. Adjuvant local radiotherapy was performed (Figure
Postoperative MRI showing that the tumor has been totally removed.
We identified 24 cases of ectopic anaplastic ependymomas with no connections to the ventricle. There were 13 males (54.2%) and 11 females (45.8%), and the ages ranged between 0.3 and 70 years (mean 28.8 years). Of the 24 ectopic anaplastic ependymoma cases, 22 were located supratentorially (91.7%) and 2 were located infratentorially (8.3%). Nineteen cases (79.2%) were intra-axial and 5 (20.8%) were extra-axial ependymomas. The location, clinical presentation, radiological finding, and outcomes are summarized in Table
All of the ectopic anaplastic ependymomas with no connection to the ventricles reported before January 2012.
Series | Sex/age | Location | Clinical presentation | Surgery | Postop. treatment | Recurrence | Outcome | Follow-up |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alexiou et al. [ |
F/10 | Rt. Frontal | Headache | GTE | NAT | Cortical | No deficits | 6 |
Davis et al. [ |
F/22 | Rt. Frontotemporal | Headache | GTE | Radiotherapy | Metastasis to scalp | No deficits | 60 |
Fukui et al. [ |
M/66 | Lt. Posterior fossa | Nerve deficit | GTE | Radiotherapy | Extra-axial cerebellar | No deficits | 30 |
Hamano et al. [ |
M/15 | Lt. Parieto-occipital | Headache | GTE | Chemotherapy | Parenchymal with cortical extension | No deficits | 12 |
Kojima et al. [ |
F/56 | Lt. Temporal | Seizure | STE | Radiotherapy | Pure cortical | No deficits | 5 |
Kutlay et al. [ |
F/11 | Lt. Frontoparietal | Seizure | STE | Radiotherapy | cortical | — | |
Miyazawa et al. [ |
M/33 | Lt. Parietal | Headache | STE | Combined | Extra-axial intratumoral hemorrhage | Mild deficits | 10 |
Moritani et al. [ |
F/50 | Rt. Temporal | Headache | STE | Combined | Recurrence in 20 m the exact grading is debatable | — | |
Ng et al. [ |
F/51 | Bifrontal | Incidental | GTE | Radiotherapy | Parenchymal with cortical extension | Handicapped | 8 |
Niazi et al. [ |
F/36 | Rt. Frontal | Seizure | GTE | Radiotherapy | Parenchymal with cortical extension | No deficits | 29 |
Niazi et al. [ |
F/18 | Rt. Frontoparietal | Seizure | GTE | Radiotherapy | Recurrence | Death | 14 |
Ohla et al. [ |
M/29 | Lt. Parietal | Seizure | STE | Radiotherapy | Parenchymal with cortical extension | Death | |
Park et al. [ |
F/17 | Rt. Parafalcine, falx | Seizure | GTE | Radiotherapy | Extra-axial meningioma | Mild deficits | 2 |
Romero et al. [ |
M/23 | Lt. Frontal | Seizure | GTE | Radiotherapy | Pure cortical | No deficits | 60 |
Singh et al. [ |
M/35 | Lt. Parafalcine, falx | Seizure | GTE | Radiotherapy | Extra-axial meningioma | No deficits | 12 |
Takeshima et al. [ |
F/70 | Rt. Frontal | Loss of consciousness | GTE | NAT | Extra-axial intratumoral hemorrhage | Bedridden | 36 |
Thakar et al. [ |
M/12 | Brainstem | Headache | Biopsy | Combined | Brainstem | Death | 1 |
Van Gompel et al. [ |
M/12 | Rt. Parietal | Seizure | GTE | Radiotherapy | Unusual epileptogenic | No deficits | 101 |
Van Gompel et al. [ |
M/25 | Rt. Frontal | Seizure | GTE | Radiotherapy | Unusual epileptogenic | No deficits | 80 |
Van Gompel et al. [ |
M/59 | Rt. Frontal | Seizure | GTE | Radiotherapy | Unusual epileptogenic | No deficits | 47 |
Vinchon et al. [ |
M/15 | Lt._Insular | Headache | STE | Combined | Recurrence in 3 m | Death | 14 |
Vinchon et al. [ |
M/0.3 | Rt. Central | Headache | STE | NAT | Recurrence in 5 m | Death | 6 |
Vinchon et al. [ |
F/13.5 | Rt. Temporal | Headache | GTE | Radiotherapy | Recurrence in 8 m | Death | 11 |
Vinchon et al. [ |
M/11.3 | Rt. Parietal | Seizure | GTE | Radiotherapy | Recurrence in 20 m | No deficits | 80 |
Present-case | M/25 | Rt. Frontal | Seizure | GTE | Radiotherapy | Extra-axial Meningioma | No deficits | 6 |
Lt.: left, Rt.: right, M: male, F: female, GTE: gross total excision, STE: Subtotal excision, NAT: no adjuvant therapy, ND: no deficits.
The frontal location was dominant, being reported in 11 cases (45.9%), including 2 frontoparietal, one frontotemporal, and one central. The most often reported clinical presentation was seizure and medically intractable epilepsy. The most often reported radiological appearance was solid with cystic formation. Preoperatively, 2 cases mimicked a meningioma, and one case mimicked a glioblastoma. Of the 24 anaplastic ependymomas, there was one case in which the exact grading is debatable [
Of the 24 cases, 12 (50%) patients had no postoperative deficits, 2 (4.2%) had mild deficits, one (4.2%) patient was handicapped, and one (4.2%) patient was bedridden. Six patients (27.3%) died during the follow-up period.
Ectopic brain ependymomas that do not have any connection to the ventricular system have been reported in all regions of the brain [
Our unique case had isointense signals on T1- and T2-weighted images and homogeneous contrast enhancement with no dural tail sign. The MRS showed characteristics of an extra-axial lesion. Our case reflects the difficulty in differentiating ectopic anaplastic ependymomas from other dural-based extra-axial lesions and other gliomas on the basis of signal characteristics alone. Due to the rarity of ectopic ependymomas, these tumors are generally not included in the differential diagnosis. Several authors reported anaplastic ependymomas that mimicked meningiomas [
Despite the malignant designation of anaplastic ependymomas, they tend to be solid and well demarcated with limited infiltration to the edges of the lesion. The diagnosis of an ectopic anaplastic ependymoma is not easy. The diagnosis varies widely depending on the pathologist’s experience with ependymomas [
Surgical excision with adjuvant radiotherapy is the primary management of anaplastic ependymomas [
The 5- and 10-year survival rates reported in the literature were 65% und 37%, respectively, with a great disparity among the studies [
Site-related outcomes were reported with the worst outcomes for intraparenchymal anaplastic ependymomas [
An increased risk of recurrence was reported with a high histological grade, incomplete resection, and a Karnofsky performance status that is less than or equal to 80 [
Tumor grade as a prognostic factor was contradictory; certain authors reported that tumor grade was an independent prognostic factor that influences outcome [
There is a need to establish a clinically based histopathological grading system for anaplastic ependymomas and a need to increase the awareness of these lesions during preoperative studies.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests. They report no financial disclosure.