Femoral fractures in amputation stump are challenging injuries to manage. The authors describe a case of a 51-year-old patient with a right above knee amputation, who had a right hip femoral neck fracture. In this technical note, we describe a technical and surgical procedure with intraoperative tips and tricks, in which we use commonly available materials, for the safe management in such clinical situations.
Residual limb fracture in an amputee is not a common entity and there are few publications regarding this pathology [
We present an unusual case of bipolar hemiarthroplasty for a subcapital femoral fracture in a patient with an above knee amputation of the same extremity. In this technical note, we describe the positioning technique, the surgical approach, and a technical variation that streamlines the surgical procedure and uses commonly available materials. This simple trick makes the procedure and the manipulation of the stump easier and avoids invasive procedures.
A 81-year-old female had a transfemoral (above knee) amputation of the right limb at the age of 70, as a result of the failure of the femoropopliteal artery bypass realized twenty years before in our hospital. She received a prosthesis which provided sufficient walking autonomy. Besides her disability resulting from the amputation, she also suffered from thoracic and lumbar spondylosis with vertebral insufficiency. She had essential arterial hypertension, chronic atrial fibrillation, osteoporosis under treatment, and bilateral surgical treatment of cataract.
The patient was presented to the emergency department with a painful right hip following falling on that side. Clinical examination found pain in the right hip, localized pain at palpation of the greater trochanter, and impossible standing position. Radiological examination found a subcapital femoral neck fracture of the right hip (Figures
The X-ray of the pelvis and the hip (an anteroposterior X-ray) showing a fracture of the femoral neck.
Under epidural anesthesia, the patient was placed in the lateral decubitus (Figures
Intraoperative photographs demonstrating the setup of the patient.
A clinical picture has showed the Hardinge approach. (a) The skin incision. (b) Articular exposure.
It is difficult to realize the dislocation of the femoral head and manipulate the amputation stump because of the short lever arm of the affected femur. We describe a simple but reproducible technique. The required materials are available in all orthopedics operating rooms. We placed a bone forceps, 5 cm, under the lesser trochanter to the femoral shaft benefiting of the already existing incision of the used surgical approach. This simple trick makes the procedure easier and avoids an invasive procedure, by manipulating internally the femur during the procedure due to posterior dislocation of the joint (Figure
A bone forceps placed 5 cm under the trochanter.
From the trochanteric fossae, a 45° angle was marked regarding the femoral shaft axis and femoral neck osteotomy was performed. The femoral head was removed by a “corkscrew” with retracting the distal femur using a bone forceps.
For maintaining the desired anteversion while preparing the femoral medullar canal with rasps, we used a bone forceps. The femoral canal was prepared according to standard technique. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty was inserted in correct anteversion. It must be placed in the appropriate, predetermined depth. We used trial femoral head prosthesis on the stem to confirm both diameter and length of neck. We attached the definitive femoral head to the stem and reduced the hip (Figure
Postoperative radiography with uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty.
30 months after the surgery, the patient was walking well using prosthesis. On examination she had a full range of motion, without any pain, and no leg length difference was noted (Figure
Satisfactory functional results, at the follow-up of 24 months.
Pelvis and hip radiographies (an anteroposterior X-ray), at the follow-up of 24 months after the hemiarthroplasty.
Arthroplasty of the hip represents an operation that is used most commonly to treat a fracture of the hip. These fractures are a common source of morbidity and mortality worldwide [
There are a few documents which were previously reported, but neither of them contained information regarding the management of hip neck fractures in patients with ipsilateral above or below knee amputations, to the best of our knowledge. Some authors suggest that most of the amputees with fracture could be treated conservatively, as the use of these methods avoids malunion and intraarticular complications [
Concerning the surgical treatment, the choice of patient positioning and manipulating of the lower limb poses a significant challenge. The surgical procedure must take into consideration certain factors such as age of patient, operative time of the surgery, surgical approach allowing better exposure, and risk of fracture related to osteoporosis. Limbs that have undergone an above knee amputation can have short stumps that can be very challenging to position or apply any manipulation. To respond to this different specification we chose the surgical approach of Hardinge [
Although the problem of aging cannot be changed, a realistic attitude could prevent accidental fall in elderly amputees. The high risk of sustaining a fracture in osteoporotic residual stump skeleton should be emphasized to these patients as part of health education.
We report a rare case of fracture of the femoral neck on a transfemoral amputation treated by hemiarthroplasty. There is little information in the specialized literature regarding this entity. The surgical technique described here has the advantage of being simple, easy to carry out and requires only a bone forceps, which is available in any operating room. To avoid having an invasive procedure is a clever trick, and it makes a complex and difficult operation much easier.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
The authors thank the patients and their families.