Case Reports in Pathology
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 2734815, 3 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2734815

Case Report

Primary Mediastinal Choriocarcinoma in an Elderly Patient with Concurrent Goserelin-Treated Prostate Adenocarcinoma

Rasmus Røge,1,2 Carsten Simonsen,³ and Astrid Christine Petersen¹

¹Department of Pathology, Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
²Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
³Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark

Correspondence should be addressed to Rasmus Røge; rr@rn.dk

Received 13 February 2019; Revised 17 April 2019; Accepted 23 April 2019; Published 6 May 2019

Academic Editor: Piero Tosi

Copyright © 2019 Rasmus Røge et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Mediastinal pure choriocarcinomas are exceedingly rare representations of germ cell tumours and are associated with a poor prognosis. To date, fewer than 20 cases have been reported. This current report describes an elderly patient who developed a large rapidly growing mediastinal tumour. Unfortunately, the patient expired before a definitive diagnosis could be reached. An autopsy revealed that the histomorphological features of the tumour showed two distinct tumour cell populations (syncytio- and cytotrophoblasts), and the diagnosis of choriocarcinoma was made. Immunohistochemical analysis showed a characteristic staining pattern in agreement with published studies. Here, we report a case of primary mediastinal choriocarcinoma in an elderly male with concurrent metastasizing prostate adenocarcinoma treated with long-term goserelin deposits, which, as we speculate, could have induced the choriocarcinoma.

1. Case Report

Choriocarcinoma is a rare malignant tumour that most commonly develops from the chorionic part of the placenta. In males, it is most commonly seen in the testes as part of a mixed germ cell tumour in young males. Extragonadal occurrence is rare—preferentially in axial structures, such as the mediastinum, retroperitoneum, and brain. The prognosis of mediastinal choriocarcinoma is usually poor, which underlines the necessity of rapid diagnosis [1].

We report here a rare case of primary mediastinal choriocarcinoma in an elderly patient with concurrent goserelin-treated metastasized prostate adenocarcinoma.

A 71-year-old man presented with a 5-week history of severe back pain. Five years earlier, the patient was diagnosed with metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason score 4+4) and was treated with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GNRH) agonist implants (goserelin, 10.8 mg). After 9 months of treatment, prostate specific antigen (PSA) values returned to normal levels.

Upon admission, bone scintigraphy showed no bone metastases but a potential compression fracture of the L2 vertebra. CT-scan confirmed a lesion in L2 and revealed a 5-cm spherical tumour located in the anterior mediastinum and multiple lung metastases. The periphery of the mediastinal tumour had high levels of Fludeoxyglucose metabolism as seen on PET-CT. The lung metastases and L2 were also PET-positive. Needle biopsy from the mediastinal tumour showed necrosis but no tumour cells. Decompressive laminectomy was performed, and suspected tumour tissue was sent for histological examination. Unfortunately, the patient expired before any conclusive diagnosis could be reached and therapy instituted.

Autopsy revealed a 5.5 cm spherical tumour in the mediastinum adherent to but not invading the left lung. The lung parenchyma bilaterally contained multiple suspected metastases. The prostate was slightly enlarged but showed no macroscopical signs of adenocarcinoma. Both testes were atrophic and without signs of focal lesions.

The extensive microscopic examination of the mediastinal tumour revealed widespread necrosis and peripheral areas with two distinct tumour cell populations (syncytio- and cytotrophoblasts) (Figure 1). Morphologically, the mediastinal tumour and the metastasis in the lung and lumbar vertebra were a pure choriocarcinoma. The tumour was extensively characterized by immunohistochemistry and showed binary expression of diagnostic markers (Table 1). Microscopic evaluation of the prostate revealed small areas (5% of the total volume) with residual adenocarcinoma.

Table 1: Immunohistochemical expression profile.

hCG
Inhibin
OCT3/4
SALL4
GLP3
GATA3
CD71
CK7
p63

Syncytiotrophoblast cells
pos
pos
neg
neg
pos
pos
pos
pos
neg

Cytotrophoblast cells
pos
neg
neg
pos
neg
pos
pos
pos
pos

Figure 1: Left: HE stained section of choriocarcinoma metastasis in L2. Right: the same section stained immunohistochemically for p63. Positive reaction (brown) in the nuclei of the cytotrophoblast cells.

On the basis of the findings above, we concluded that the tumour was a primary mediastinal choriocarcinoma.

2. Discussion

The origin of extragonadal choriocarcinomas has been debated [2]. They have been suggested to develop from foci of pluripotent cells in the axial structures or to be metastases from a testicular tumour. In a case series of eight primary mediastinal choriocarcinomas, no primary lesions were found in the testes suggesting the existence of true primary mediastinal choriocarcinomas [1]. As we unfortunately did not perform microscopic examination of the testes, this case does not shed further light on this issue.

Diagnosis of extragonadal choriocarcinomas can be challenging due to samples comprising predominantly necrosis but only small amounts of tumour cells suitable for diagnosis. Immunohistochemical markers can often promote correct diagnosis.

Our findings are similar to previously published immunohistochemical studies of choriocarcinomas. The tumour was classically positive for hCG. The germ cell markers SALL4 and glypican 3 exhibited a characteristic binary staining pattern (Table 1) [3, 4]. One group found glypican 3 strongly positive in the syncytiotrophoblasts, while the cytotrophoblasts were weakly positive [3]. Although the latter result deviates from our findings, we still observed a binary staining pattern. This difference may in part be explained by a different staining methodology. In agreement with a study of 11 choriocarcinomas, GATA3 was positive in both tumour cell subpopulations [5]. In concurrence with a recent article, syncytiotrophoblast cells were positive for inhibin and CK7, while cytotrophoblast cells were positive for inhibin, p63, and CK7 [6].

At time of diagnosis, the patient was 71 years old. This differs significantly from the typical epidemiology of mediastinal choriocarcinomas, which occurs primarily in younger patients [7]. One might speculate that the long-term treatment with goserelin may have stimulated development of the tumour, especially considering that GNRH receptors are expressed in choriocarcinomas [8]. On the contrary, one in vitro study found inhibitory properties of endogenous GNRH in a single choriocarcinoma cell line [9]. However, these results may only be extrapolated to goserelin with caution, since synthetic GNRH agonists are 50 to 100 times more potent than endogenous GNRH [10].

Insights into the potential carcinogenic properties of goserelin and knowledge of expression of GNRH receptors may be utilized in the diagnosis and treatment of choriocarcinomas.

3. Conclusion

Extragonadal choriocarcinomas are extremely rare germ cell tumours, and diagnosis requires advanced immunohistochemical analysis. The prognosis is usually poor, which underlines the necessity of rapid diagnosis in order to institute treatment before progression hinders treatment. In this case report, we speculate that long-term treatment with goserelin may have stimulated the development of the choriocarcinoma.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

C. A. Moran and S. Suster, “Primary mediastinal choriocarcinomas: A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of eight cases,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1007–1012, 1997.

G. Berthod, H. Bouzourene, C. Pachinger, and S. Peters, “Solitary choriocarcinoma in the lung,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 574-575, 2010.

D. L. Zynger, M. J. Everton, N. D. Dimov, P. M. Chou, and X. J. Yang, “Expression of glypican 3 in ovarian and extragonadal germ cell tumors,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 224–230, 2008.

D. Cao, J. Li, C. C. Guo, R. W. Allan, and P. A. Humphrey, “SALL4 is a novel diagnostic marker for testicular germ cell tumors,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1065–1077, 2009.

M. Miettinen, P. A. McCue, M. Sarlomo-Rikala et al., “GATA3: a multispecific but potentially useful marker in surgical pathology: a systematic analysis of 2500 epithelial and nonepithelial tumors,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2014.

S. J. Wegman, A. V. Parwani, and D. L. Zynger, “Cytokeratin 7, inhibin, and p63 in testicular germ cell tumor: superior markers of choriocarcinoma compared to β-human chorionic gonadotropin,” Human Pathology, vol. 84, pp. 254–261, 2019.

C. A. Moran and S. Suster, “Primary germ cell tumors of the mediastinum: I. Analysis of 322 cases with special emphasis on teratomatous lesions and a proposal for histopathologic classification and clinical staging,” Cancer, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 681–690, 1997.

H. Yin, K. W. Cheng, H.-L. Hwa, C. Peng, N. Auersperg, and P. C. K. Leung, “Expression of the messenger RNA for gonadotropin-releasing hormone and its receptor in human cancer cell lines,” Life Sciences, vol. 62, no. 22, pp. 2015–2023, 1998.

J. Horvath, T. Ertl, Y. Qin, K. Groot, and A. Schally, “Lh-rh and its antagonist cetrorelix inhibit growth of jar human choriocarcinoma cells in-vitro,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 969–975, 1995.

J. B. Engel and A. V. Schally, “Drug insight: Clinical use of agonists and antagonists of luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone,” Nature Clinical Practice Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 157–167, 2007.