To improve patient support, it is important to understand how people view and experience Heart Failure (HF) self-care. This systematic review of qualitative studies included all published studies that examine the influence of sex and gender on HF self-care. A systematic search was done for papers (1995–2010) indexed in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid PsycINFO, CSA Sociological Abstracts, OVID AARP Ageline, EBSCO Academic Search Complete, EBSCO CINAHL, EBSCO SocINDEX, ISI Web of Science: Social Sciences Citation Index and Science Citation Index Expanded, and Scopus. After screening of 537 citations, six qualitative studies identified that differences existed in perceptions of symptoms with women having less family involvement and psychosocial support around self-care. Moreover, women had considerably more negative views of the future, themselves and their ability to fulfill social self-care roles. Women with HF represent a highly vulnerable population and need more support for psychosocial wellbeing and self-care.
1. Introduction
Due to ageing populations and increased survival rates from myocardial infarction, Heart Failure (HF) is now at epidemic levels in high-income countries [1, 2]. As a result, the costs of caring for people with HF are very high and rising. Over past decades, a primary strategy in reducing the personal and cost-related HF burden has been to promote the use of evidence-based medication prescribing [3–5]. However, over the last 5 years, there has been a growing recognition that to reduce the HF burden, it is vital to also address HF self-care [6–15]; that is, “the decisions and strategies undertaken by the individual in order to maintain life, healthy functioning and wellbeing” [16]. After being comparatively neglected for many years, self-care is now recognized as a “cornerstone” of effective HF management [9, 11].
Effective HF self-care improves the performance of the heart, reduces the demands of the body on the heart, and promotes general wellbeing. Evidence to support the importance of self-care in each of these areas has improved vastly over recent decades [15]. There is now strong evidence from large randomized trials and cohort studies that mortality, morbidity, and symptoms can be improved in key self-care domains through
consumption of key medications [17, 18],
behavioural/lifestyle management (including smoking cessation, and salt, fluid and weight management) [1, 15, 19],
timely use of health services [1], regular physical activity and good social relationships [1, 15].
Self-care of HF is important because the vast majority of ongoing care is undertaken by the person with HF and their caregiver(s) in the home—outside of the direct presence, supervision, or support of the health professional in a healthcare setting [9, 11]. Recognition of the importance of self-care has been made in recent clinical guidelines [1, 15, 19–22]. Although recent research on self-care and its determinants has recognized a number of influential factors (including age, knowledge, coping skills, confidence, cognition) [12], the influence of sex and gender on HF self-care is not well understood [23]. To increase our understanding of the influence of sex and gender on HF self-care, we reviewed existing qualitative studies of self-care in HF patients. These studies specifically contained data on the influence of sex and gender on self-care practices.
2. Materials and Methods
With the definition of HF self-care guiding the paper—and the perception of HF self-care as a complex process, qualitative research studies were selected for inclusion. Qualitative studies have been used extensively in health research to understand user approaches and behaviours [24]. Qualitative approaches do not presuppose the topics or factors that will be identified in a research study as influencing self-care. As such, qualitative methods are used to inform the understanding of complex phenomena prior to quantitative research. A qualitative systematic paper is used to synthesize findings from similar qualitative studies [25, 26]. It has been used previously to examine patients’ reactions and experiences of HF [27].
Sex was defined in the review as “the classification of living things, generally as male or female according to their reproductive organs and functions assigned by the chromosomal complement” [28]. Gender was defined as the, distinct and individual properties of men and women that are “expressed through the values they hold, their psychosocial characteristics, and ultimately their behaviours” ([29] page 275]). Gender also has interactive or contingent dimensions of social identity; individual properties of masculinity or femininity are elicited from men and women in some social contexts, but not others [30, 31].
2.1. Inclusion Criteria
The search strategy involved general and specific terms in relation to HF. To be included in the review, studies had to include, adults over 18 years of age, be in English, men only, women only or mixed-sex studies that specifically explored the influence of gender or sex using qualitative or mixed (qualitative and quantitative) methods. The search included studies using different qualitative methodologies (including grounded theory, interpretive descriptive, and ethnography) and various techniques for data collection (including interviews and focus groups). Studies that contained data for people with coronary heart disease were excluded because these populations have different self-care needs compared to HF patients. Surveys were also excluded as these studies do not constitute qualitative research as conventionally defined.
A search was done for studies published from 1995 to 2010 that were indexed in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid PsycINFO, CSA Sociological Abstracts, OVID AARP Ageline, EBSCO Academic Search Complete, EBSCO CINAHL, EBSCO SocINDEX, ISI Web of Science: Social Sciences Citation Index and Science Citation Index Expanded and Scopus. Over 110 keywords were used around heart failure and self-care (e.g., heart, self-manage*) and relevant research methods (e.g., semistructured, interview, narrative methods). Additional studies were identified from reference lists.
2.2. Literature Reviewing Process
Quality of the studies meeting the inclusion criteria was independently assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool for qualitative research [32]—a valid tool for the assessment of quality in qualitative research [33]. Data extraction was undertaken by the primary author for each paper and checked by the second author. Data were extracted on the focus of the study, the population (i.e., patients, family/caregivers, health professionals), sample (i.e., men only, women only, mixed), type of sampling (i.e., convenience, purposive, theoretical, other), number and age of the sample, sample setting (i.e., country) and the method/approach of the study (i.e., grounded theory, interpretive, mixed methods, ethnography, critical theory phenomenology, etc.) and data collection methods (i.e., face to face/telephone interviews). Quality was assessed independently using the CASP tool with disagreements resolved by consensus. The metaethnographic approach [34] was used to synthesize findings from the studies. This involved the primary author reading each study to identify, based on the team’s approach to self-care, the main self-care needs of patients/lay caregivers and links between different needs and age. Matrices were developed to record these first order interpretations [26, 35]. These represent the main findings of each study as presented by the participants in the studies [33, 36]. The details of each study in terms of setting and quality were also extracted and taken into account at this stage. Stage two (second-order coding) involved the researchers examining the relationships between concepts identified in the findings from the matrices [37]. Second-order interpretations of common or reoccurring concepts were sought and interpreted in the context of study quality and setting [36]. For the third stage (synthesis), the main concepts identified during the second stage (second order interpretations) were used to reinterpret each paper and reconsider the relationships between the papers. The results of this synthesis will be the findings of the review.
3. Results
After initial screening of 537 studies, 78 papers were retrieved, and reviewed in full. From these studies, six studies were identified that used qualitative methods containing or examined themes related to gender differences in HF patient’s perceptions and experiences (Table 1). These studies recruited patients with a wide range of ages (35 to 95 years). Sample sizes ranged from 4 to 32 with a total of 61 women and 31 men. Only one study [38] had a sample of men only. Four studies recruited women-only samples [39–42]. Two studies from Sweden used a “phenomenographic” approach [38, 39], two studies from the United States of America (USA) used a “phenomenology” approach [40, 41], and two studies (USA and Australia) used “mixed methods” [42, 43].
Summary of included studies.
Author, year, and country
Main aim
Data collection
Sampling criteria
Sample and gender
Mårtensson et al., (1997) (Sweden) [38]
From a nurses perspective, explore how male patients with CHF conceive their life situation.
One open and semi-structured interview. Time elapse between Dx and interview: 5 patients: 2–6 months 3 patients: 7–12 months 2 patients: 13–18 months 2 patients: 19–24 months.
Male patient’s from medical clinic with CHF. Variables on the log list were, age, month/year of diagnosis, NYHA classification, aetiology, education, civil status, occupation.
n=12 Male
Mårtensson et al., (1998) (Sweden) [39]
From a nurses perspective how female patients with CHF conceive their life situation.
One open, semi-structured interview Time elapse between Dx and interview: 2 patients: 2–6 months; 4 patients; 7–12 months; 3 patients: 13–18 months; 3 patients: 19–24 months.
Female patients from a medical clinic, between ages of 65 and 83 years. Variables on the log list were, age, month/year of diagnosis. NYHA classification, aetiology, education, civil status, and occupation.
n=12Female
Rhodes, and Bowles (2002) (USA) [40]
Examine and describe the experience of older women living with NYHA class II HF.
Four semi-structured interviews, <1 hour each.
Female patients between ages of 60–90 years who self-reported they had been Dx by their cardiologist with NYHA stage II HF or identified by health professionals and through presentations at retirement centre’s, Caucasian, diagnosed with HF from 2 to 10 years.
n=5Female
Allen et al., (2009) (USA) [41]
Explore the lived experience of HF, in middle aged women with NYHA class III.
Convenience sample of 4 women screened by case manager at cardiology practice using criteria: female; dx with NYHA class III HF; ≥21 years of age; verbally articulate; willing to participate
n=4Female Consecutive women with class III HF were recruited until redundancy in description was obtained.
Gary, (2006) (USA) [42]
Examine the frequency of self-care practices in women with DHF and describe the demographic and clinical characteristics that affect self-care practices in women with DHF.
2 hr audio taped, semi structured interview guide by telephone or face to face interview.
Convenience sample of 32 women Dx diastolic HF, NYHA Class II-III >50 years of age at a large health science center recruited by a cardiologist from a study comparing combined walking and education program and an education program only. MMSE >25, on optimal pharmacologic HF therapy.
n=32Female
Riegel, et al., (2010) (Australia) [43]
Describe HF self-care in men and women and identify gender-specific barriers and facilitators influencing HF self-care.
Cross-sectional, comparative mixed methods study quantitative survey and qualitative semi structured narrative audio taped and transcribed interview, either face to face or telephone.
A 2008 cross-sectional, comparative mixed methods study was reviewed for in-depth interviews eliciting self-care behaviors and exploring barriers and facilitators of self-care. From this study a purposive sample of English speaking NYHA Class II/III HF of ≥6 months with a MMSE score of >24.
Mixed n=19 (70% Male) n=8 (30% Female)
NYHA: New York heart association; HF: heart failure; CHF: congestive heart failure; Dx: Diagnosis; SD: standard deviation; MMSE: mini mental status exam.
All the included studies used semistructured interviews as a method of data collection, and recruited patients ≥18 years of age with NYHA classifications of Class II or III. The six qualitative studies varied in methodological quality (2 high quality, 1 medium quality, and 2 low quality papers). The qualitative studies chosen were systematically evaluated to comprehend the influence of gender on HF patients’ willingness and capacity for effective self-care. The stated foci of studies were illness experiences [38–41] or barriers and facilitators of HF self-care [42, 43]. However, each used gender as a means to interpret data that resulted in similar categories/themes. These similarities not only identify relevant issues, they also support the value of each study and their findings.
The data from all these studies, having been organized into various themes/categories, gave adequate illustration of the different aspects of the self-care experience of men and women with HF. The qualitative research objectives covered several aspects about living with HF, including: (1) new self concept, (2) physical limitations, (3) negative emotions/losses, (4) support/deepening relationships, (5) rejuvenate/rest, (6) hope, (7) uniqueness of gender. Participants were recruited from outpatient clinics [38, 39]; professional referrals [40], unspecified healthcare settings [41], and from a previously hospitalized sample of HF patients [43].
The most overarching theme identified across the sexes in relation to HF was the overwhelming physical limitations experienced by men and women—their loss of energy, high fatigue and shortness of breath/breathlessness affected all aspects of life, including occupation, social, and recreational roles [38–43]. This occurred even when participants were not clear what was causing their symptoms, for example, some women reported difficulty in differentiating HF symptoms from their wider emotions [43].
Reductions in physical activity in the form of sitting or sleeping were used to prevent and/or alleviate symptoms in all the studies. Taking time to try and complete the activities of daily living, while accepting the fact they may not complete the task was common across sexes [38–43].
3.1.2. Changes to Social Roles and Identity
Life after a diagnosis of HF, compared to past functioning, and social roles, was seen in negative terms by both sexes. However, women viewed themselves in a range of more negative ways, including: being “handicapped”, “sick”, “burdensome” or “worthless” [39, 41, 42].
Fears of death, isolation, of being a burden, and struggles with depression and unhappiness over their physical limitations were common across the sexes [39–42]. However, again women experienced more negative feelings of anger and hate towards their HF [40, 41] and reported greater loss of hope [41, 43]. The women worried over a lack of money, not being able to care for others or of being dependent on others [39, 40, 42]. Some women increased coping by consciously refocusing “…their mental energy in ways more productive for dealing with their HF” [40] or placed great hope in maintaining their present level of functioning [39, 42].
Conversely, men reported a wider range of positive and negative emotions compared to women. Some reported being more “anxious” or “fearful” both about HF [43] and its effects on their family [38]. However, in relation to the future, other men were hopeful and determined [38]. Age appeared to moderate men’s emotions—with younger men being more negative about HF and the negative effects on life [43].
3.1.3. Social Support and Relationships
While women saw supportive relationships as being based on having someone to talk to [39–43], women in all the studies frequently reported that they did not have another close person they could rely on to even help with activities of daily living [39, 40, 42, 43]. Conversely, men reported having more tangible support with family members being involved in supporting their HF self-care [38, 43]. With the assistance of family, men had more confidence in interpreting symptoms of HF and self-care [38, 43].
4. Discussion
This paper identified that though HF has severe effects on the physical and psychosocial wellbeing of both sexes, women frequently experience more negative emotions in relation to the HF, tend to have lower confidence, poorer social and family support, and see the future as more bleak. Age and culture did appear to influence the experiences and reactions to HF in conjunction with gender and sex. Further research into these interactive effects is needed.
These patterns in women are a cause for concern because achieving effective HF self-care is difficult for both sexes. This process is complex as it requires a range of activities, skills, confidence and sustained efforts. As HF is associated with older age, women comprise more than half of the already large population with HF [44, 45]. Achieving optimal conditions for effective self-care in the large female HF population is therefore of high clinical significance.
Though people with HF tend to be at risk for poor psychosocial health with 40% having depression or depressive symptoms [46], women are particularly vulnerable to adverse psychosocial health and support. This may be because women with HF tend to have more symptoms than men [47, 48]. However, it may also be related to the lower psychosocial and family support identified in the studies in this review or to a reluctance of men to voice being isolated or fearful. That said, there is wider evidence from observational studies that psychosocial factors are more adverse in women with HF and that these psychosocial factors not only affect wellbeing but also HF self-care [49–51].
The large size and distinctive self-care needs of the population of women with HF suggest that more gender-sensitive approaches are needed for care and disease management. While supporting self-care is now recognized to be a vital part of effective disease management [11], there is as yet little appreciation or acknowledgement in clinical guidelines that women have distinct or greater needs for psychosocial support than men with HF. This paper and other evidence [49–51] indicate that women need additional support around psychosocial factors and self-care that is sensitive to elements of gender and sex.
Health professionals providing care to people with HF during the self-care management phase should be aware of the vulnerability that women can experience around psychosocial health and support. Where possible, families, partners and other lay caregivers should be mobilized to provide effective support to the women with HF not only around self-care but also in relation to more general psychosocial wellbeing. In addition to increasing psychosocial support, antidepressant medications should be considered for women who are suitable candidates [52].
As with most systematic reviews, this review was confined to studies that had been published. While there is a sizable body of qualitative research into HF, relatively few studies included or incorporated gender into analyses. The data in the studies contain only preliminary insights into how gender influences HF patients’ willingness and capacity for effective self-care. Further research is needed into understanding the nature and influences on psychosocial factors in women with HF. The effects of contextual factors such as being married, widowed, ethnicity, living alone, years of HF experience, education, income and age on women need further exploration.
5. Conclusions
Patients of both sexes experience severe physical and psychosocial effects from HF. Yet, women with HF tend to have considerably more negative views of the future, themselves and their ability to fulfill social self-care roles. Women also report having less support for psychosocial wellbeing and self-care. As a highly vulnerable population, women need more and better support from health professionals, families and caregivers for psychosocial wellbeing and self-care.
Acknowledgments
Alexander M. Clark receives career awards from Alberta Innovates Health Care Solutions and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Task Force for Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of European Society of CardiologyESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology20082923882442JessupM.2009 focused update: ACCF/AHA guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure in adults: a report of the American college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force on practice guidelines: developed in collaboration with the international society for heart and lung transplantation200911914197720162-s2.0-6554915491310.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192064McMurrayJ. J. V.Failure to practice evidence-based medicine: why do physicians not treat patients with heart failure with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors?199819, supplementL15L212-s2.0-0031658211ClelandJ. G. F.SwedbergK.FollathF.KomajdaM.Cohen-SolalA.AguilarJ. C.DietzR.GavazziA.HobbsR.KorewickiJ.MadeiraH. C.MoiseyevV. S.PredaI.Van GilstW. H.WidimskyJ.FreemantleN.EastaughJ.MasonJ.The EuroHeart Failure survey programme—a survey on the quality of care among patients with heart failure in Europe—part 1: patient characteristics and diagnosis20032454424632-s2.0-003733637110.1016/S0195-668X(02)00823-0KomajdaM.FollathF.SwedbergK.ClelandJ.AguilarJ. C.Cohen-SolalA.DietzR.GavazziA.Van GilstW. H.HobbsR.KorewickiJ.MadeiraH. C.MoiseyevV. S.PredaI.WidimskyJ.FreemantleN.EastaughJ.MasonJ.The EuroHeart Failure survey programme—a survey on the quality of care among patients with heart failure in Europe—part 2: treatment20032454644742-s2.0-034480694510.1016/S0195-668X(02)00700-5JillingsC.Patients with heart failure had inadequate information about the disease and lacked the tools for optimal self-care200774127DicksonV. V.TkacsN.RiegelB.Cognitive influences on self-care decision making in persons with heart failure200715434244312-s2.0-3454796170010.1016/j.ahj.2007.04.058DunbarS. B.ClarkP. C.QuinnC.GaryR. A.KaslowN. J.Family influences on heart failure self-care and outcomes20082332582652-s2.0-4264909858910.1097/01.JCN.0000305093.20012.b8EvangelistaL. S.levangel@ucla.eduShinnickM. A.What do we know about adherence and self-care?200823325025710.1097/01.JCN.0000317428.98844.4dMoserD. K.WatkinsJ. F.Conceptualizing self-care in heart failure: a life course model of patient characteristics20082332052182-s2.0-4264909859010.1097/01.JCN.0000305097.09710.a5RiegelB.Foreword: self-care of heart failure: what is the state of the science?20082331871892-s2.0-4264912671410.1097/01.JCN.0000305087.12388.10RiegelB.DicksonV. V.A situation-specific theory of heart failure self-care20082331901962-s2.0-4264910266510.1097/01.JCN.0000305091.35259.85ClarkA. M.FreydbergC. N.McAlisterF. A.TsuyukiR. T.ArmstrongP. W.StrainL. A.Patient and informal caregivers' knowledge of heart failure: necessary but insufficient for effective self-care20091166176212-s2.0-6894910967710.1093/eurjhf/hfp058JaarsmaT.ÅrestedtK. F.MårtenssonJ.DracupK.StrömbergA.The European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour scale revised into a nine-item scale (EHFScB-9): a reliable and valid international instrument2009111991052-s2.0-6244930267210.1093/eurjhf/hfn007RiegelB.MoserD. K.AnkerS. D.AppelL. J.DunbarS. B.GradyK. L.GurvitzM. Z.HavranekE. P.LeeC. S.LindenfeldJ.PetersonP. N.PresslerS. J.SchockenD. D.WhellanD. J.State of the science: promoting self-care in persons with heart failure: a scientific statement from the american heart association200912012114111632-s2.0-7034975749510.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192628JaarsmaT.StrömbergA.MårtenssonJ.DracupK.Development and testing of the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale2003533633702-s2.0-004244106410.1016/S1388-9842(02)00253-2DaviesM. K.GibbsC. R.LipG. Y. H.Management: diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and nitrates200032072324284312-s2.0-0034639534LonnE.McKelvieR.Drug treatment in heart failure20003207243118811922-s2.0-0034728798ArnoldJ. M. O.LiuP.DemersC.DorianP.GiannettiN.HaddadH.HeckmanG. A.HowlettJ. G.IgnaszewskiA.JohnstoneD. E.JongP.McKelvieR. S.MoeG. W.ParkerJ. D.RaoV.RossH. J.SequeiraE. J.SvendsenA. M.TeoK.TsuyukiR. T.WhiteM.Canadian Cardiovascular Society consensus conference recommendations on heart failure 2006: diagnosis and management200622123452-s2.0-33644554148Heart Failure Society of America2006St Paul, Minn, USAHeart Failure Society of AmericaHeart Failure Society of America2006St Paul, Minn, USAHeart Failure Society of AmericaArnoldJ. M. O.HowlettJ. G.DucharmeA.EzekowitzJ. A.GardnerM. J.GiannettiN.HaddadH.HeckmanG. A.IsaacD.JongP.LiuP.MannE.McKelvieR. S.MoeG. W.SvendsenA. M.TsuyukiR. T.O'HalloranK.RossH. J.SequeiraE. J.WhiteM.Canadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus conference guidelines on heart failure—2008 update: best practices for the transition of care of heart failure patients, and the recognition, investigation and treatment of cardiomyopathies200824121402-s2.0-40749147609NgA. C. C.WongH. S. P.YongA. S. C.SindoneA. P.Impact of gender on outcomes in chronic systolic heart failure2007117221422110.1016/j.ijcard.2006.04.079PopeC.MaysN.Qualitative Research: reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research1995311699642452-s2.0-0029029095Dixon-WoodsM.FitzpatrickR.Qualitative research in systematic reviews200132373167657662-s2.0-0035818255PoundP.BrittenN.MorganM.YardleyL.PopeC.Daker-WhiteG.CampbellR.Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking20056111331552-s2.0-1744436616010.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.063YuD. S. F.LeeD. T. F.KwongA. N. T.ThompsonD. R.WooJ.Living with chronic heart failure: a review of qualitative studies of older people20086154744832-s2.0-3884919968510.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04553.xInstitute of Medicine2001Washington, DC, USANational Academy PressKingK. M.ArthurH. M.Coronary heart disease prevention: views on women's gender-based perceptions and meanings20031842742812-s2.0-0142181110FenstermakerS.WestC.2002New York, NY, USARoutledgeWestC.ZimmermanD. H.Doing gender198722125151NHS Learning and Development2007FederG. S.HutsonM.RamsayJ.TaketA. R.Women exposed to intimate partner violence: expectations and experiences when they encounter health care professionals: a meta-analysis of qualitative studies2006166122372-s2.0-3034448665710.1001/archinte.166.1.22NoblitG.HareR.1988London, UKSageMaysN.PopeC.PopayJ.Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field20051016202-s2.0-2224443594510.1258/1355819054308576BrittenN.CampbellR.PopeC.DonovanJ.MorganM.PillR.Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example2002742092152-s2.0-003678845310.1258/135581902320432732GrahamI. D.LoganJ.HarrisonM. B.StrausS. E.TetroeJ.CaswellW.RobinsonN.Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?200626113242-s2.0-3364684860910.1002/chp.47MårtenssonJ.KarlssonJ. E.FridlundB.Male patients with congestive heart failure and their conception of the life situation19972535795862-s2.0-0031089450MårtenssonJ.KarlssonJ. E.FridlundB.Female patients with congestive heart failure: how they conceive their life situation1998286121612242-s2.0-0032240008RhodesD. L.BowlesC. L.Heart failure and its impact on older women's lives20023954414492-s2.0-003672496410.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02309.xAllenJ. W.Arslanian-EngorenC.Lynch-SauerJ.The lived experience of middle-aged women with New York Heart Association class III heart failure: a pilot study2009243961012-s2.0-7014910749010.1111/j.1751-7117.2009.00042.xGaryR.Self-care practices in women with diastolic heart failure20063519192-s2.0-3084443639910.1016/j.hrtlng.2005.04.005RiegelB.DicksonV. V.KuhnL.PageK.Worrall-CarterL.Gender-specific barriers and facilitators to heart failure self-care: a mixed methods study20104778888952-s2.0-7384911721210.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.12.011PruittA. L.Heart failure: it's not just for men20082033273412-s2.0-4724910602910.1016/j.ccell.2008.03.010YancyC. W.FonarowG. C.AlbertN. M.CurtisA. B.StoughW. G.GheorghiadeM.HeywoodJ. T.McBrideM. L.MehraM. R.O'ConnorC. M.ReynoldsD.WalshM. N.Influence of patient age and sex on deliveryof guideline-recommended heart failure care in the outpatient cardiology practice setting: findings from IMPROVE HF200915747547622-s2.0-6294917633410.1016/j.ahj.2008.12.016RutledgeT.ReisV. A.LinkeS. E.GreenbergB. H.MillsP. J.Depression in heart failure. A meta-analytic review of prevalence, intervention effects, and associations with clinical outcomes2006488152715372-s2.0-3374953119710.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.055EkmanI.EhrenbergA.Fatigue in chronic heart failure—does gender make a difference?20021177822-s2.0-003834243110.1016/S1474-5151(01)00016-0VaccarinoV.ChenY. T.WangY.RadfordM. J.KrumholzH. M.Sex differences in the clinical care and outcomes of congestive heart failure in the elderly19991385 I8358422-s2.0-003271728210.1016/S0002-8703(99)70007-4HeoS.MoserD. K.LennieT. A.RiegelB.ChungM. L.Gender differences in and factors related to self-care behaviors: a cross-sectional, correlational study of patients with heart failure20084512180718152-s2.0-5634909039710.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.05.008ChungM. L.MoserD. K.LennieT. A.Worrall-CarterL.BentleyB.TruppR.ArmentanoD. S.Gender differences in adherence to the sodium-restricted diet in patients with heart failure20061286286342-s2.0-3374958731710.1016/j.cardfail.2006.07.007GonzálezB.LupónJ.ParajónT.UrrutiaA.AltimirS.CollR.PratsM.ValleV.Nurse evaluation of patients in a new multidisciplinary Heart Failure Unit in Spain20043161692-s2.0-184247208010.1016/j.ejcnurse.2003.12.001O'ConnorC. M.JiangW.KuchibhatlaM.MehtaR. H.ClaryG. L.CuffeM. S.ChristopherE. J.AlexanderJ. D.CaliffR. M.KrishnanR. R.Antidepressant use, depression, and survival in patients with heart failure200816820223222372-s2.0-5594912566510.1001/archinte.168.20.2232