We study the existence of solutions for time fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff type equation involving left and right Liouville-Weyl fractional derivatives via variational methods.
National Natural Science Foundation of China116713391. Introduction
In recent years, there has been a great interest in studying problems involving fractional Schrödinger equations [1–5], Kirchhoff type equations [6–8], fractional Navier-Stokes equations [9, 10], and fractional ordinary differential equations and Hamiltonian systems [11–17], and so forth. For further details and applications, we refer the reader to [18, 19] and the references cited therein.
On the other hand, the integer-order Schrödinger-Kirchhoff type equations have also been investigated by many authors; for example, see [20–23]. In fact, Schrödinger-Kirchhoff type equations play an important role in modelling several physical and biological systems. However, to the best of our knowledge, the existence of solutions to the time fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff type equations has yet to be addressed.
The objective of the present paper is to study time fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff type equation of the form(1)a+b∫RDtα-∞ut2dtθ-1D∞αtDtα-∞ut+μVtu=ft,u,t∈R,u∈HαR,where α∈(1/2,1], Dtα-∞ and D∞αt, respectively, denote left and right Liouville-Weyl fractional derivatives of order α on R, a,b>0 are constants, μ>0 is parameter, θ>1, f∈C(R×R,R), and V:R→R+ is a potential function.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 contains preliminary concepts of fractional calculus and fractional Sobolev space, while some important lemmas, which are needed in the proof of main results, are obtained in Section 3. We present our main results in Section 4.
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we recall important definitions and concepts of fractional calculus and then prove certain results about fractional Sobolev space Hα(R) related to our study of the problem at hand.
Definition 1 (see [24]).
The left and right Liouville-Weyl fractional integrals of order α∈(0,1) on R are defined by(2)Ixα-∞ϕx=1Γα∫-∞xx-ξα-1ϕξdξ,I∞αxϕx=1Γα∫x∞ξ-xα-1ϕξdξ,respectively, where x∈R.
The left and right Liouville-Weyl fractional derivatives of order α∈(0,1) on R are defined by(3)Dxα-∞ϕx=ddxIx1-α-∞ϕx,D∞αxϕx=-ddxI∞1-αxϕx,respectively, where x∈R.
The definitions (3) may be written in an alternative form as follows:(4)Dxα-∞ϕx=αΓ1-α∫0∞ϕx-ϕx-ξξα+1dξ,D∞αxϕx=αΓ1-α∫0∞ϕx-ϕx+ξξα+1dξ.
Also, we define the Fourier transform F(u)(ξ) of u(x) as (5)Fuξ=∫-∞∞e-ix·ξuxdx.
For any α>0, we define the seminorm and norm, respectively, as [16](6)uI-∞α=Dxα-∞uL2,uI-∞α=uL22+uI-∞α21/2,and let the space I-∞α(R) denote the completion of C0∞(R) with respect to the norm ·I-∞α.
Next, for 0<α<1, we give the relationship between classical fractional Sobolev space Hα(R) and I-∞α(R), where Hα(R) is defined by (7)HαR=C0∞R¯·α, with the norm(8)uα=uL22+uα21/2,and seminorm (9)uα=ξαFuL2. Observe that the spaces Hα(R) and I-∞α(R) are equal and have equivalent norms (see [16]).
Therefore, we define (10)HαR=u∈L2R∣ξαFu∈L2R.
Let (11)Xα=u∈HαR∣∫RDtα-∞ut2+ut2dt<∞. The space Xα is a reflexive and separable Hilbert space with the inner product(12)u,vXα=∫RDtα-∞ut·Dtα-∞vt+utvtdtand the corresponding norm (13)uXα2=u,uXα. Define the space (14)Xμα=u∈Xα:∫RμVtu2dt<+∞, with the norm (15)uXμα=∫Raθ-1Dtα-∞ut2dt+∫RμVtu2dt1/2.
Lemma 2.
(Xμα,·Xμα) is a uniformly convex Banach space.
Proof.
Xμα is obviously Banach space. Now, we can prove that (Xμα,·Xμα) is uniformly convex. To this end, let 0<ε<2 and u,v∈Xμα with uXλα=vXμα=1 and u-vXμα≥ε. Using the following inequality:(16)a+b22+a-b22≤12a2+b2,∀a,b∈R, we get(17)u+v2Xμα2+u-v2Xμα2=∫Raθ-1Dtα-∞u+v2t2dt+∫RμVtu+v22dt+∫Raθ-1Dtα-∞u-v2t2dt+∫RμVtu-v22dt≤12∫Raθ-1Dtα-∞ut2dt+∫Raθ-1Dtα-∞vt2dt+∫RμVtu2dt+∫RμVtv2dt=12uXμα2+vXμα2=1,which implies that (u+v)/2Xμα2≤1-ε/2. Hence, taking δ=δ(ε) such that 1-ε/2=1-δ, we have (u+v)/2Xμα2≤1-δ. Therefore, (Xμα,·Xμα) is uniformly convex.
In the sequel, we need the following assumptions.
V(t)∈C(R,R), V0≔inft∈RV(t)>0;
there exists r>0 such that, for any M>0, (18)meast∈y-r,y+r:Vt≤M⟶0as y⟶∞;
there exists l0>0 such that ∫t≥l0Vt-1dt<∞;
f∈C(R×R,R) and there exist constants c0,c1,…,cl>0 and qj∈(2,2θ) such that (19)ft,u≤c0u+∑j=1lcjuqj-1,∀t,u∈R×R;
f(t,u)=o(u) as u→0 uniformly in t∈RN;
there exist λ∈(2θ,∞) such that (20)λFt,u≤ft,uu,∀t∈R,u∈R;
F(t,u)/u2θ→+∞ as u→+∞ uniformly in t∈R;
f(t,-u)=-f(t,u) for all (t,u)∈R×R;
f∈C(R×R,R) and there exists 1<p<2 such that (21)ft,u≤up-1,∀t,u∈R×R;
there exist σ1>0, 0<σ2<1/8D22 (D2 is defined in Remark 6), 1≤γ<2, and small constants 0<r0<r1 such that (22)σ1uγ<Ft,u≤σ2u2,r0≤u≤r1, a.e. t∈R.
Lemma 3.
Assume that (V1) holds. Then the embeddings Xμα↪Xα↪L2(R) are continuous. In particular, there exists a constant C2>0 such that(23)uL2R≤C2uXμα∀u∈Xμα.Moreover, if (V1) and (V2) hold, then the embedding Xμα↪L2(R) is compact.
Proof.
Clearly, the chain of embeddings Xμα↪Xα↪L2(R) is continuous and consequently one can obtain (23). Also in view of (V1), (V2), and following the method of proof similar to that of Lemma 2.2 in [15], the embedding Xμα↪L2(R) is compact.
Lemma 4.
Let α>1/2. Then Hα(R)⊂C(R) and there exists a constant C=Cα such that(24)supx∈Rux≤CuXμα.
Proof.
The proof is similar to that of Theorem 2.1 in [16], so we omit it.
Also by Lemma 4, there is a constant Cα>0 such that(25)u∞≤CαuXμα.
Remark 5.
If u∈Hα(R) with 1/2<α<1, then it follows by Lemma 4 that u∈Lq(R) for all q∈[2,∞) as (26)∫Ruxqdx≤u∞q-2uL2R2.
Remark 6.
From Remark 5 and Lemma 3, it is easy to verify that the imbedding of Xμα in Lq(R) is also compact for q∈(2,∞). Hence, for all 2≤q<∞, the imbedding of Xμα in Lq(R) is continuous and compact, which together with Lemma 4 implies that there exists Dq>0 such that (27)uLqR≤DquXμα.
Lemma 7.
Assume that (V1) and (V3) hold. Then the embedding Xμα↪Lp(R) is continuous and compact for p∈[1,+∞).
Proof.
By (V3) and Hölder’s inequality, we have (28)∫t≥l0utdt≤∫t≥l0Vtut2dt1/2∫t≥l0Vt-1/2dt1/2≤c1uXμα, for some positive constant c1. So Lemma 4 implies that (29)u1=∫-l0l0utdt+∫t≥l0utdt≤2l0u∞+c1uXμα≤c2uXμα, for some positive constant c2. Hence, by Remark 6, we can get continuous embeddings Xμα into Lp(R) for p∈[1,+∞). Now, we will show that the embedding is compact for p∈[1,+∞). Let un⊂Xμα such that un⇀0 and M>0 such that uXμα≤M. In view of (V3), given ε>0, for l>0 large enough, one can obtain (30)∫t≥l0Vt-1/2dt<ε2M2.Then, (31)∫t≥lutdt≤∫t≥lVtut2dt1/2∫t≥lVt-1/2dt1/2≤ε2MuXμα≤ε2. On the other hand, by Sobolev’s theorem (see, e.g., [25]) which implies that un→0 uniformly on [-l,l], there is n0 such that ∫-llutdt<ε/2 for all n≥n0. Thus un→0 in L1(R). So, for 1<p<∞, we have (32)∫Ruxpdx≤u∞p-1∫Rutdt≤c3u1⟶0, and consequently, un→0 in Lp(R) for p∈[1,+∞).
Definition 8.
Let X be a Banach space, I∈C1(X,R). One says that I satisfies the Palais-Smale (PS) condition if any sequence (un)∈X for which I(un) is bounded and I′(un)→0 as n→∞ possesses a convergent subsequence.
In order to establish the main results, we need the following known Theorems.
Theorem 9 (see [26, Theorem 2.2]).
Let X be a real Banach space and I∈C1(X,R) satisfies (PS) condition. Suppose I(0)=0 and
there are constants ρ,α>0 such that I∂Bρ(0)≥0;
there is an e∈X∖Bρ(0)¯ such that I(e)≤0.
Then I possesses a critical value c≥α. Moreover c can be characterized as (33)c=infγ∈Γmaxs∈0,1Iγs, where (34)Γ=γ∈C0,1,X:γ0=0,γ1=e.
Theorem 10 (see [26, Theorem 9.12]).
Let X be an infinite dimensional Banach space and let I∈C1(X,R) be even, satisfying (PS) condition, and I(0)=0. If X=Y⊕Z, where Y is finite dimensional and I satisfies the following conditions:
there exist constants ρ,α>0 such that I∂Bρ∩Z≥α;
for any finite dimensional subspace X~⊂X, there is R=R(X~)>0 such that I(u)≤0 on X~∖BR,
then I possesses an unbounded sequence of critical values.
3. Some Lemmas
Recall that u∈Xμα is said to be a weak solution of problem (1) if(35)a+b∫RDtα-∞ut2dtθ-1∫RDtα-∞ut·Dtα-∞φtdt+∫RμVtutφtdt=∫Rft,utφtdt,∀φ∈Xμα,and the energy functional Iμ,θ:Xμα→R is given by the formula(36)Iμ,θu=12bθa+b∫RDtα-∞ut2dtθ+12∫RμVxut2dt-∫RFt,utdt,where F(x,u)=∫0uf(t,s)ds.
In view of assumptions (V1) and (F1), the functional Iμ,θ is of class C1(Xμα,R) and by similar method in Theorem 4.1 in [27] and the definition of Gâteaux derivative, one can get(37)Iμ,θ′u,φ=a+b∫RDtα-∞ut2dtθ-1∫RDtα-∞ut·Dtα-∞φtdt+∫Rμtutφtdt-∫Rft,utφtdt,∀u,φ∈Xμα.
Lemma 11.
Assume that (V) and (F1)–(F3) hold. Then Iμ,θ satisfies the (PS) condition.
Proof.
Let unn∈N⊂Xμα be a sequence such that Iμ,θunn∈N is bounded and Iμ,θ′(un)→0 as n→∞. Then there exits D>0 such that Iμ,θ′un,un≤DuXμα and Iμ,θun≤D. So, by (F3), (23), and the fact that λ>2θ>1, we get (38)λD+DuXμα≥λIμ,θun-Iμ,θ′un,un=λ2bθa+b∫RDtα-∞unt2dtθ+λ2∫RμVtunt2dt-λ∫RFt,untdt-a+b∫RDtα-∞unt2dtθ-1∫RDtα-∞unt2dt-∫RμVtunt2dt+∫Rft,untuntdt=aλ2bθa+b∫RDtα-∞unt2dtθ-1+λ-2θ2θa+b∫RDtα-∞unt2dtθ-1∫RDtα-∞unt2dt+λ-22∫RμVtunt2dt+∫Rft,untunt-λFt,untdt≥λ-2θ2θaθ-1∫RDtα-∞unt2dt+λ-22∫RμVtunt2dt≥λ-2θ2θuXμα2. Hence, unn∈N is bounded in Xμα.
So, passing onto subsequence if necessary, thanks to Lemma 3, we have(39)un⇀u,weakly in Xμα,un⟶u,strongly a.e. in R,un⟶u,strongly a.e. in LsRN,2≤s<+∞,(40)∫RDtα-∞unt2dt⟶ρ1≥0,∫RμVtun2dt⟶ρ2≥0.We will prove that (41)∫RDtα-∞ut2dt=ρ1,∫RμVtu2dx=ρ2. Let φ∈Xμα be fixed and denote by Bφ the linear functional on Xμα defined by(42)Bφv≔∫RDtα-∞φt·Dtα-∞vtdt, and set(43)Δαu≔∫RDtα-∞ut2dt, for all v∈Xμα. In view of the Hölder inequality and definition of Bφ, we have(44)Iμ,θ′un-Iμ,θ′u,un-u=a+bΔαunθ-1Bunun-u-a+bΔαunθ-1Buun-u+∫RμVtun-uun-udt-∫Rft,un-ft,uun-udt≥a+bΔαunθ-1Δαun-a+bΔαunθ-1Δαunθ-1/2Δαun1/2+a+bΔαuθ-1Δαu-a+bΔαuθ-1Δαuθ-1/2Δαun1/2+∫RμVtun2dt-∫RμVtun2dt1/2∫RμVtu2dt1/2+∫RμVtu2dt-∫RμVtu2dt1/2∫RμVtun2dt1/2-∫Rft,un-ft,uun-udt=a+bΔαunθ-1Δαunθ-1/2Δαun1/2-Δαu1/2+a+bΔαuθ-1Δαuθ-1/2Δαu1/2-Δαun1/2+∫RμVtun2dt1/2∫RμVtun2dt1/2-∫RμVtu2dt1/2+∫RμVtu2dt1/2∫RμVtu2dt1/2-∫RμVtun2dt1/2-∫Rft,un-ft,uun-udt=Δαun1/2-Δαu1/2a+bΔαunθ-1Δαunθ-1/2-a+bΔαuθ-1Δαuθ-1/2+∫RμVtun2dt1/2-∫RμVtu2dt1/22-∫Rft,un-ft,uun-udt. Since un⇀u in Xμα and Iμ,θ′(un)→0 as n→∞ in (Xμα)∗, therefore Iμ,θ′(un)-Iμ,θ′(u),un-u→0 as n→∞. Now, using (F1) and Hölder inequality, we obtain (45)∫Rft,un-ft,uun-udt≤∫Rc0un+u+∑j=1lcjunqj-1+uqj-1un-udx≤c0unL2R+uL2Run-uL2R+∑j=1lcjunLqjRqj-1+unLqjRqj-1un-uLqjR, which, in view of (39), yields(46)limn→∞∫Rft,un-ft,uun-udt=0.Since un→u a.e. in R, it follows by Fatou’s lemma that(47)Δαu≤liminfn→∞Δαun=ρ1,∫RμVtu2dt≤liminfn→∞∫RμVtun2dt=ρ2.Noting that Π(s)=(a+bs)θ-1sθ-1/2 is a nondecreasing function for s≥0, we get (48)ρ11/2-Δαu1/2a+bρ1θ-1ρ1θ-1/2-a+bΔαuθ-1Δαuθ-1/2,ρ21/2-∫RμVtu2dt1/22≥0.Now, in view of Iμ,θ′(un)-Iμ,θ′(u),un-u→0 as n→∞, (46), and (47), one has(49)0≥liminfn→∞Δαun1/2-Δαu1/2a+bΔαunθ-1Δαunθ-1/2-a+bΔαuθ-1Δαuθ-1/2+∫RμVtun2dt1/2-∫RμVtu2dt1/22-∫Rft,un-ft,uun-udt≥limn→∞Δαun1/2-Δαu1/2a+bΔαunθ-1Δαunθ-1/2-a+bΔαuθ-1Δαuθ-1/2+limn→∞∫RμVtun2dt1/2-∫RμVtu2dt1/22-limn→∞∫Rft,un-ft,uun-udt≥ρ11/2-Δαu1/2a+bρ1θ-1ρ1θ-1/2-a+bΔαuθ-1Δαuθ-1/2+ρ21/2-∫RμVtu2dt1/22.Then, from (48)-(49), we get (50)Δαu=∫RDtα-∞ut2dt=ρ1,∫RμVtu2dt=ρ2. Hence, we obtain unXμα→uXμα. As Xμα is a reflexive Banach space (see Lemma 2), it is isomorphic to a locally uniformly convex space. So the weak convergence and norm convergence imply strong convergence. This completes the proof.
Let ej be a total orthonormal basis of L2(R) and define Xj=Rej, j∈N, (51)Yk=⊕j=1kXj,Zk=⊕j=k+1∞Xj,k∈N.
Lemma 12.
Assume that (V1) holds. Then, for 2<p<+∞, (52)βk≔supu∈Zk,uXμα=1uLpR⟶0,k⟶∞.
Proof.
The proof is similar to that of Lemma 3.8 in [28]. So it is omitted.
In view of Lemma 12, we can choose an integer k≥1 such that(53)∫Ru2dt≤12c0∫RaDtα-∞ut2dt+∫RμVtu2dt∀u∈Zm∩Xμα,where c1 is a constant given in condition (F1). Let (54)Rt=1,t>r,0,t≤r, and set Y=1-Ru:u∈Xμα,1-Ru∈Yk and Z=1-Ru:u∈Xμα,1-Ru∈Zk+Rv:v∈Xμα. Hence Y and Z are subspaces of Xμα, and Xμα=Y⊕Z.
Lemma 13.
Suppose that (V1), (V2), and (F1) are satisfied. Then there exist constants ϱ,β>0 such that Iμ,θ∂Bϱ∩Z≥α.
Proof.
In view of (V2), (53), and definition of the space Z, we have(55)uL2R2=∫t<rut2dt+∫t≥rut2dt≤12c0uXμα2+1μω∫t∈R,Vt>ωμVtut2dt≤12c0uXμα2+1μωuXμα2∀u∈Z.Therefore, from (23), (55), and (F1) and for large enough value of μ, we get (56)Iμ,θu=12bθa+bΔαuθ+12∫RμVtu2dt-∫RFt,udt≥aθ-12Δαu+12∫RμVtu2dt-∫RFt,udt≥12uXμα2-c02uL2R2-∑j=1lcjqjuLqjRqj≥14uXμα2-c0μω2uXμα2-∑j=1lcjDqjqjqjuXμαqj≥18uXμα2-∑j=1lcjDqjqjqjuXμαqj.Since 2<qj(j=1,…,l), there exist constants ϱ,β>0 such that Iμ,θ∂Bϱ∩Z≥β.
Lemma 14.
Assume that (F1) and (F4) are satisfied. Then, for any finite dimensional subspace X~μα⊂Xμα, there is R=R(X~μα)>0 such that Iμ,θ(u)≤0 on X~μα∖BR.
Proof.
Since all the norms in the finite dimensional space are equivalent, there exists a constant Υ such that (57)uL2θR≥ΥuXμα,∀u∈X~μα. From (F1) and (F4), for any L>bθ-1/2θΥ2θaθ(θ-1), there exists a constant CL>0 such that (58)Ft,u≥Lu2θ-CLu2,∀t,u∈R×R. Thus (59)Iμ,θu=12bθa+bΔαuθ+12∫RμVtu2dt-∫RFt,udt≤12bθa+baθ-1uXμα2θ+12uXμα2+CLuL2R2-LuL2θR2θ≤12bθa+baθ-1uXμα2θ+12+CLD22uXμα2-LΥ2θuXμα2θ for all u∈X~μα. Consequently, there is a large R>0 such that Iμ,θ(u)≤0 on X~μα∖BR. Therefore, the proof is completed.
4. Existence of Weak Solutions
In this section, we present our main results.
Theorem 15.
Assume that (V1), (V2), (F1), (F3), (F4), and (F5) hold. Then problem (1) has infinitely many nontrivial weak solutions whenever μ>0 is sufficiently large.
Proof.
We know that Iμ,θ(0)=0, and it is even by (F5). Let X=Xμα and Y and Z be as defined in Section 2. By Lemmas 11, 13, and 14, it follows that Iμ,θ satisfies all the condition of the Theorem 10. Therefore, problem (1) has infinitely many nontrivial weak solutions whenever μ>0 is sufficiently large.
Theorem 16.
Assume that (V1), (V2), (F1), (F2), (F3), and (F4) hold. Then problem (1) has at least one nontrivial weak solution when μ>0.
Proof.
We complete the proof in three steps.
Step 1. Clearly Iμ,θ(0)=0 and Iμ,θ∈C1(Xμα,R) satisfies the (PS) condition by Lemma 11.
Step 2. It will be shown that there exist constants ϱ,β>0 such that Iμ,θ satisfies condition (i) of Theorem 9. For any ε>0, by (F1) and (F2), there exists a constant cε>0 such that(60)Ft,u≤ϵ2u2+∑j=1lcjεqjuqj.Thus, by (23) and (60), for small ρ>0, we get (61)Iμ,θu=12bθa+bΔαuθ+12∫RμVtu2dt-∫RFt,udt≥aθ-12Δαu+12∫RμVtu2dt-∫RFt,udt≥12uXμα2-εD22uXμα2-∑j=1lcjεqjDqjqjuXμαqj≥181-εD22ϱ2, for all u∈B¯ϱ, where Bϱ=u∈Xμα:uXμα<ϱ. So it suffices to choose ε=1/2D22 so that (62)Iμ,θ∂Bϱ≥116ϱ2≔β>0.
Step 3. It remains to prove that there exists an e∈Xμα such that uXμα>ϱ and Iμ,θ(e)≤0, where ρ is defined in Step 2. Let us consider (63)Iμ,θσu=12bθa+bσ2Δαuθ+σ22∫RμVtu2dt-∫RFt,σudt, for all σ∈R. Take 0≠u∈Xμα. By (F1) and (F4), for any κ>bθ-1(Δα(u))θ/2θ∫R|u|2θdt, there is a constant Cκ>0 such that (64)Ft,u≥κu2θ-Cκu2. So we have (65)Iμ,θσu≤12bθa+bσ2Δαuθ+σ22∫RμVtu2dt+Cκσ2∫Ru2dt-κσ2θ∫Ru2θdt⟶-∞, as σ→+∞. Thus, there is a point e∈Xμα∖B¯ϱ such that Iμ,θ(e)≤0. By Theorem 9, Iμ,θ possesses a critical value c≥α>0 given by (66)c=infγ∈Γmaxs∈0,1Iμ,θγs, where (67)Γ=γ∈C0,1,X:γ0=0,γ1=e. Hence there is u∈Xμα such that Iμ,θ(u)=c and Iμ,θ′(u)=0; that is, problem (1) has a nontrivial weak solution in Xμα.
Theorem 17.
Assume that (V1), (V3), (F5), (F6), and (F7) hold. Then problem (1) has infinitely many nontrivial weak solutions for μ>0.
Proof.
One can obtain the proof by employing the method of proof for Theorem 15 and using Lemma 7.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11671339).
BayınS. Ş.Time fractional Schrödinger equation: fox’s H-functions and the effective potential20135401210310.1063/1.4773100MR3059867DubbeldamJ. L.TomovskiZ.SandevT.Space-time fractional Schrödinger equation with composite time fractional derivative20151851179120010.1515/fca-2015-0068MR3417088IominA.Fractional-time Schrödinger equation: fractional dynamics on a comb2011444-534835210.1016/j.chaos.2011.03.005MR2795940LaskinN.Fractional Schrödinger equation20026605610810.1103/PhysRevE.66.056108MR1948569NaberM.Time fractional Schrödinger equation20044583339335210.1063/1.1769611MR2077514NyamoradiN.ZhouY.Existence of solutions for a Kirchhoff type fractional differential equations via minimal principle and Morse theory2015462617630MR34949612-s2.0-8495528930310.12775/TMNA.2015.061XiangM.ZhangB.Degenerate Kirchhoff problems involving the fractional p-Laplacian without the (AR) condition20156091277128710.1080/17476933.2015.1005612MR3373742XiangM.ZhangB.FerraraM.Existence of solutions for Kirchhoff type problem involving the non-local fractional p-Laplacian201542421021104110.1016/j.jmaa.2014.11.055MR3292715ZhouY.PengL.On the time-fractional Navier—Stokes equations201773687489110.1016/j.camwa.2016.03.026MR3623092ZhouY.PengL.Weak solutions of the time-fractional Navier-Stokes equations and optimal control20177361016102710.1016/j.camwa.2016.07.007MR3623103WangJ.Fe\v ckanM.ZhouY.A survey on impulsive fractional differential equations201619480683110.1515/fca-2016-0044MR3543681Zbl1344.351692-s2.0-84985028215WangJ.FĕckanM.ZhouY.Center stable manifold for planar fractional damped equations201729625726910.1016/j.amc.2016.10.014MR3572793ZhouY.AhmadB.AlsaediA.Existence of nonoscillatory solutions for fractional neutral differential equations201772707410.1016/j.aml.2017.04.016MR3652432ZhouY.VijayakumarV.MurugesuR.Controllability for fractional evolution inclusions without compactness20154450752410.3934/eect.2015.4.507MR3461697Zbl1335.340962-s2.0-84957558534Mendez CruzG. A.Torres LedesmaC. E.Multiplicity of solutions for fractional Hamiltonian systems with Liouville-Weyl fractional derivatives201518487589010.1515/fca-2015-0053MR3377400Zbl1321.340152-s2.0-84938934007TorresC.Existence of solutions for fractional Hamiltonian systems20132013, article 259112ZhouY.ZhangL.Existence and multiplicity results of homoclinic solutions for fractional Hamiltonian systems20177361325134510.1016/j.camwa.2016.04.041MR3623125IominA.Fractional-time quantum dynamics20098022-s2.0-7034947977010.1103/PhysRevE.80.022103022103LaskinN.Fractional quantum mechanics20006233135314510.1103/PhysRevE.62.3135Zbl0948.81595CammarotoF.VilasiL.On a Schrödinger-Kirchhoff-type equation involving the p(x)-Laplacian201381425310.1016/j.na.2012.12.011MR3016438GuoY.NieJ.Existence and multiplicity of nontrivial solutions for p-Laplacian Schrödinger-Kirchhoff-type equations201542821054106910.1016/j.jmaa.2015.03.064MR3334964NieJ.Existence and multiplicity of nontrivial solutions for a class of Schrödinger-Kirchhoff-type equations20144171657910.1016/j.jmaa.2014.03.027MR3191413PucciP.XiangM.ZhangB.Multiple solutions for nonhomogeneous Schrödinger-Kirchhoff type equations involving the fractional p-Laplacian in RN20155432785280610.1007/s00526-015-0883-5MR3412392KilbasA. A.SrivastavaH. M.TrujilloJ. J.2006Amsterdam, the NetherlandsElsevier Science B.V.MR2218073StuartC. A.1995Société Mathématique de BelgiqueMR1361485RabinowitzP. H.198665Providence, RI, USAAmerican Mathematical Society10.1090/cbms/065MR845785Zbl0609.58002JiaoF.ZhouY.Existence of solutions for a class of fractional boundary value problems via critical point theory20116231181119910.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.086MR2824707WillemM.1996Boston, Mass, USABirkhäuser10.1007/978-1-4612-4146-1MR1400007Zbl0856.49001