On the Solutions of a System of Third-Order Rational Difference Equations

in which the initial conditions x −2 , x −1 , x 0 , y −2 , y −1 , y 0 are arbitrary positive real numbers. Difference equations appear as a natural model of evolution phenomena. Furthermore, considerable findings in difference equation theory have been retrieved as discrete analogues and as numerical solutions of differential equations. This is notably true in the case of Lyapunov theory of stability. What is more, it has applications in biology, ecology, economy, physics, and so on. Due to this matter, there has been a rise in the interest in the study of qualitative analysis of scalar rational difference equations and rational system of difference equations. Although difference equations look simple in form, it is quite difficult to understand thoroughly the behaviors of their solutions because some prototypes for the development of the basic theory of the global behavior of nonlinear difference equation come from the results of rational difference equations (see [1–6]) and the references cited therein. El-Dessoky and Elsayed [7] have analyzed the form of the solutions and the periodicity character of the following systems of rational difference equations:

Kurbanli [10] has explored the following system of difference equations: Mansour et al. [11] have got the form of the solutions of some systems of the following rational difference equations: Touafek and Elsayed [12] have studied the periodicity and gave the form of the solutions of the following systems of difference equations of order two: Equations similar to difference equations and nonlinear systems of rational difference equations were investigated; see [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].
Lemma 2. Let {  ,   } be a positive solution of system (8); then every solution of system ( 8) is bounded and converges to zero.

The Second System:
. The structure of the solutions of the following system of the difference equations is examined in this subsection.
Theorem 3. Suppose that {  ,   } are solutions of the system Then for  = 0, 1, 2, . .., one has where Proof.For  = 0 the result holds.By using mathematical induction now suppose that  > 0 and that our assumption holds for  − 1,  − 2. That is, Now, it follows from system (17) substitution of the above equations that Also, we obtain Hence the proof is complete.

The Third System:
In this subsection, the framework of the solution of the following system of difference equations is acquired.
Then for  = 0, 1, 2, . .., one sees that all solutions of system ( 23) are given by the following formulas: where Proof.For  = 0 the result holds.By using mathematical induction now suppose that  > 0 and that our assumption holds for  − 1.That is, Now, it follows from system (23) substitution of the above equations that Also, we obtain Thus, the other relations can be proven in a similar way.Hence the proof is complete.

The Fourth System: 𝑥
In this subsection, we analyze the solutions of the system of the following two difference equations.

= −𝑎𝑐𝑒/ (𝑐 + 𝑒) (𝑓
Thus, the other relations can be proven in a similar way.Hence the proof is complete.

Numerical Examples
To illustrate the results of foregoing sections and to support our theoretical discussions, we take into account several interesting numerical examples in this section.

Conclusion
In this analysis, we oversee the structure of the solutions of four cases of the difference equations system  +1 =    −2 /( −1 +  −2 ),  +1 =    −2 /(± −1 ±  −2 ).Additionally, some behavior of the solutions such as boundedness is investigated.Subsequently, some numerical examples are displayed by presenting some numerical values for the initial values per case and figures provided to justify the behavior of the obtained solutions in the case of numerical examples.