Disease Markers
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 260732, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/260732

Research Article

Transporter TAP1-637G and Immunoproteasome PSMB9-60H Variants Influence the Risk of Developing Vitiligo in the Saudi Population

Nasser Attia Elhawary,1,2 Neda Bogari,¹ Essam Hussien Jiffri,³ Mona Rashad,4,5 Abdulhamid Fatani,⁶ and Mohammed Tayeb¹

¹Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, P.O. Box 57543, Mecca 21955, Saudi Arabia
²Department of Molecular Genetics, Medical Genetics Center, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
³Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
⁴Department of Pediatrics, Al-Qatif Central Hospital, Dammam 31911, Saudi Arabia
⁵Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
⁶National Guard Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia

Received 5 November 2014; Revised 20 November 2014; Accepted 21 November 2014; Published 7 December 2014

Academic Editor: Giuseppe Murdaca

Copyright © 2014 Nasser Attia Elhawary et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

We evaluated whether TAP1-rs1135216 (p.637D>G) and PSMB9-rs17587 (p.60R>H) were significantly associated with the risk and severity of vitiligo among Saudi patients. One hundred seventy-two subjects were genotyped for the TAP1-rs1135216 and PSMB9-rs17587 variants using endonuclease digestions of amplified genomic DNA. The TAP1-rs1135216 and PSMB9-rs17587 mutant alleles were strongly associated with vitiligo, with odds ratios showing five fold and two fold risks ( and , resp.). In TAP1-rs1135216, the 637G mutant allele was more frequent in cases (74%) than in healthy controls. In cases, the 60H mutant allele PSMB9-rs17587 was less frequent (42%) than the wild-type 60R allele (58%). Vitiligo vulgaris was the most common type of disease, associated with the DG (55%) and GG (46%) genotypes for rs1135216 and with the RH genotype (59%) for rs17587. The heterozygous 637DG and 60RH genotypes were each linked with active phenotypes in 64% of cases. In conclusion, the TAP1-rs1135216 and PSMB9-rs17587 variants are significantly associated with vitiligo, and even one copy of these mutant alleles can influence the risk among Saudis. Vitiligo vulgaris is associated with genotypes containing the mutant G and H alleles.

1. Background

Vitiligo is characterized by skin depigmentation due to a lack of melanocytes in the dermis or the inability to produce melanin. The depigmentation takes the form of circumscribed, white macules in the skin that form when the melanocytes in the epidermis destruct [1]. Worldwide prevalence of vitiligo ranges from 0.09% to 8% [2]: 0.14% in Russia, 0.38% in Caucasians [2], 0.22–1.22% in Egypt [3, 4], 1–2.5% in the United States and Japan [5], 4% in Mexico [6], and 8% in India [7]. The prevalence among randomly selected female students in an eastern Saudi province has been recorded as 0.4% [8]. Despite the low prevalence of vitiligo in Saudi Arabia, the disease represents a great burden on the social and psychological well-being of the Saudi community [9].

Studies have shown that autoimmune processes participate in the pathogenesis of vitiligo [10]. Besides, previous studies suggest that nitric oxide, as a free radical initiator, has been involved in the inhibition of cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis and, thus, may also contribute to the pathogenesis of various autoimmune diseases [11]. Other theories that have been proposed to explain the pathomechanisms of vitiligo include neural, radical, self-destruction, and inherent-defect theories [12]. Although some of them may be relevant to vitiligo, none of them explain the pathological mechanism of the disease perfectly.

Several candidate genes have been linked to vitiligo [13], such as genes involved in the leukocyte antigen system (HLA, MIM 615161), cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated 4 (CTLA4, MIM 123890), tumor necrosis factors (TNFα, MIM 191160), and autoimmune regulators (AIRE gene, MIM 607358) [14]. Transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) genes are encoded in the MHC-II region of the human HLA locus (MIM 615161). TAP is composed of two integral membrane proteins, TAP1 and TAP2, which assemble into a heterodimer that results in a four-domain transporter. TAP1 functions by providing candidate peptides to the MHC-I molecules within the peptide-loading complex and by transporting antigen peptides from the cytoplasm into the endoplasmic reticulum [15]. Proteasomes are responsible for degrading short-lived cytoplasmic proteins into peptides [16]. Among its 28 subunits, the 20S proteasome includes two subunits known as PSMB8 (LMP7) and PSMB9 (LMP2).

TAP and the immunoproteasome PSMB have been reported to be associated with several autoimmune diseases [16], such as celiac disease [17], Sjögren’s syndrome [18], type 1 diabetes [19, 20], juvenile rheumatoid arthritis [18], and multiple sclerosis [21]. A few case-control studies have also shown genetic variants of TAP and PSMB to be associated with vitiligo in ethnic Caucasians, suggesting a possible role in the antimelanocyte autoimmune response involved in the disease [22]. The genetic variants TAP1-rs5735883 and PSMB8-rs37360 have been studied in Saudi vitiligo cases [23], but no significant associations have been found.

Although a large amount of genetic information is available on vitiligo, most of the reports are from Western populations. Only 14 articles have focused on vitiligo in Middle East populations; two of them are from Saudi Arabia [24, 25]. Here, we report the findings of a study to further investigate the associations between TAP1/PSMB genetic variants and vitiligo in Saudi patients and to evaluate the influence of genotypes on risk and severity of disease. We specifically focused on the TAP1-rs1135216 (p.637D>G) and PSMB9-rs17587 (p.60R>H) mutant alleles.

2. Subjects and Methods

2.1. Study Population

A group of 86 Saudi patients with vitiligo were selected from dermatologic outpatient clinics of different provinces in Saudi Arabia for molecular study at the Medical Genetics Laboratories, Medical College, Umm Al-Qura University. After giving their informed consents, patients were interviewed and evaluated to confirm the diagnosis of vitiligo. The information gathered from the patients included age at disease onset, gender, clinical history of the patients and their relatives, consanguineous status (if present), history of other autoimmune disorders, previous treatment (if any), and types and distribution of vitiligo lesions in the patient and pedigree. Patients who had been exposed to any therapy in the past six months were excluded from the study.

Classic subtypes of vitiligo were classified as focal (if there was one or more maculae in a nonsegmented pattern), vulgaris (if there was symmetric or asymmetric distribution of maculae in one or more areas), segmental (if there were unilateral depigmented macules that did not cross the midlines), acral/acrofacial (if there was loss of skin color on tips of fingers and toes, the anogenital area, and the lips and “around the eyes” area of the face), and universalis (complete or >80% skin depigmentation). The phenotype of the disease was classified as active (if it was progressive, or if new maculae had appeared in the past six months) or stable. None of the healthy subjects () showed clinical evidence or a family history of vitiligo or of any other autoimmune disorder. The protocols used in the study were approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University.

2.2. DNA Isolation

Genomic DNA samples were extracted from peripheral blood (200 μL) using the QIAamp DNA blood kit (Qiagen, Hilden, GmbH, Germany). In some cases, DNA was prepared in situ by gentle scraping of the buccal mucosa for 30 sec using a cytobrush [26]. The cells obtained were treated directly with diluted NaOH solution, heated, and neutralized with Tris-Cl, pH 8.0. A 2.5 mL volume of buccal cells typically sufficed for amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

2.3. Genotyping of the rs1135216 and rs17587 Loci

Genomic DNA was added to a 25 μL reaction volume containing 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.3, 1.5 mM MgCl₂, 60 mM of each dNTP, and 0.25 units of Taq DNA polymerase (BIORON, GmbH, Germany). Previously reported primers for the rs1135216 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)—the forward primer 5′-CTC ATC TTG GCC CTT TGC TC-3′ and the reverse 5′-CAC CTG TAA CTG GCT GTT TG-3′—and for the rs17587 SNP—the forward primer 5′-GTG AAC CGA GTG TTT GAC AAG C-3′ and the reverse 5′-GCC AGC AAG AGC CGA AAC AAG-3′ [22]—were synthesized (Metabion Co., GmbH, Germany). PCR samples were subjected to 35 cycles on PCR Engine Dyad (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA) with annealing at 58°C for 30 sec. To genotype these SNPs, the rs1135216 and rs17587 PCR amplicons were incubated with the AccI and HhaI enzymes (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), respectively, at 37°C for 2 h. The fragments were separated on a 3% MetaPhor agarose gel (BMA, Rockland, ME) using ethidium bromide staining and viewed under a UV transilluminator (G-Box, SynGene, Frederick, MD).

The 637D allele of TAP1 remained uncut (165 bp), but the 637G allele was cleaved into two fragments (136 and 29 bp). Similarly, the 60H allele of PSMB9 remained uncut (252 bp), but the 60R allele was cleaved into two fragments (212 bp and 40 bp). A positive control was used for each polymorphism. Each sample was run in duplicate. The genotypes of all samples were reassessed twice to confirm the results and ensure reproducibility. Some suspected genotypes were validated by purifying the PCR products using automated Agencourt AMPure XP kit (Beckman Coulter, Canada) and genotyping using Genetic Analyzer 3500 (ABI, Life Technologies, USA).

2.4. Data Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The data were presented as means ± standard deviations. Student’s t-tests and -tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the contributions of TAP1-rs1135216 and PSMB9-rs17587 alleles and other independent risk factors to study the severity of vitiligo disease. A value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The distribution of the control genotypes was checked for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium using the -test (http://www.oege.org/software/hwe-mr-calc.shtml).

We used Power software (Germany, version 3.1.5, http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/abteilungen/aap/gpower3/download-and-register/) to perform a priori power analysis to estimate sufficient sample sizes to achieve adequate power for -testing of two independent proportions. A priori sample-size estimations were performed using known information on the common allele frequencies in vitiligo patients, a criterion probability of , and a power sensitivity of 80%. The prevalence of vitiligo in the studied population was assumed to be 50%, with a case-control ratio of 1.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Study Population

Table 1 shows selected demographic and clinical characteristics of the 86 vitiligo patients. The mean age at onset was 11.5 years and at examination was 22.0 years. The gender distribution of the patients was 1 : 1. No significant differences () were found between cases and controls with regard to age and sex.

Table 1: Demographic and clinical features of vitiligo patients ().

Characteristic
Number (%)a
( value)b

Average age (mean ± SD)

    At onset (range)
 y (2–47 y)
6.0 ()c

(9.3–13.7)

    At examination (range)
 y (2–50 y)
12.5 ()c

(19.3–24.7)

Ratio of women : men
1 : 1

Family history
34/86 (39.5)
12.3 (<0.0001)

Consanguinity
14/86 (16.3)
4.8 (<0.0001)

Progressive/stabled
48 (66.7)/24 (33.3)
24.0 (<0.0001)

Sensitivity to sun
43/86 (50)
19.1 (<0.0001)

Thyroid pathology (hypo)
14/86 (16.3)
4.8 (<0.0001)

Diabetes mellitus type 1
5/86 (5.8)
0.34 (0.73)

Early graying of hair
24/86 (27.9)
10.3 (<0.0001)

Halo nevie
5/18 (27.8)
10.0 (<0.0001)

Numbers in parentheses are expressed in percentages unless otherwise stated.

bAll values are expressed in terms of -test unless otherwise stated.

cValues are expressed in terms of -test.

d14 cases could not be clinically followed up.

eOnly 18 of 86 cases were investigated for halo nevi.

About 40% of the patients had a positive family history and 16% had consanguinity. Most had an active phenotype of depigmented patches (67%), but 33% had a stable phenotype. All patients had the generalized type of vitiligo, and 50% suffered from sensitivity to the sun. Vitiligo cases with hypothyroidism differed significantly (16.3%; ) from cases without the thyroid pathology, but cases with diabetes mellitus type 1 did not differ significantly (5.8%; ) from cases without diabetes. Relatively few cases showed early graying of hair (29%).

3.2. Allele Frequencies and Genotype Distribution

Tables 2(a) and 2(b) illustrates the allele frequencies and genotype distribution of the TAP1-rs1135216 and PSMB9-rs17587 SNPs. The genotype frequencies deviated from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for the rs1135216 SNP () but satisfied this equilibrium for rs17587 () in the healthy controls; the difference between the expected and observed values for the control genotypes was not significant (). The allele frequencies of the two SNPs were strongly associated with vitiligo, with ORs showing fivefold and twofold risks, respectively (OR = 5.2, for rs1135216 and OR = 1.9, for rs17587). The 637G mutant allele of TAP1 was more frequent in cases (74%) than in healthy controls (36%). Among patients, the 60H mutant allele of PSMB9 was less frequent (42%) than the 60R wild-type allele (58%).

Table 2: Allele and genotype frequencies of TAP1-D637G and PSMB9-R60H polymorphisms among Saudi patients ().

(a)

Allele
Vitiligo patients
Controls
OR
( value)
95% CI

(frequency)
(frequency)

D
44 (0.26)
110 (0.64)
5.2
7.0 (<0.0001)
3.2–8.2

G
128 (0.74)
62 (0.36)

R
100 (0.58)
124 (0.72)
1.86
2.7 (0.007)
1.2–2.9

H
72 (0.42)
48 (0.28)

(b)

Genotype
(%)
(%)
( value)

TAP1-D637G:

    DD
0 (00.0)
24 (27.9)
16.2 (<0.0001)

    DG
44 (51.2)
62 (72.1)

    GG
42 (48.8)
0 (00.0)

    (DG + GG)
86 (100)
62 (72.1)

PSMB9-R60H:

    RR
26 (30.2)
44 (51.1)
4.5 (0.03)

    RH
48 (55.8)
36 (41.9)

    HH
12 (14.0)
6 (7.0)

    (RH + HH)
60 (69.8)
42 (48.9)

As for genotype distribution, none of the cases had the 637DD genotype and none of the controls had the 637GG genotype. When we focused on the distribution of genotypes containing the mutant alleles (DG+GG and RH+HH), we found highly significant differences between cases and controls (, for TAP1-rs1135216 and , for PSMB9-rs17587).

3.3. Stratified Analysis of the Genetic Variants and Clinical Types of Vitiligo

We investigated the effects of the rs1135216 and rs17587 variants on the clinical types of vitiligo (Table 3). Vitiligo vulgaris (VV) was the most common type of disease among the Saudi patients (51%), followed by focal vitiligo (FV, 21%) and acral/acrofacial vitiligo (AV, 19%). Segmented vitiligo (SV) and universalis vitiligo (UV) were the least common (2% and 7%, resp.). Among the VV cases, 55% had the 637DG genotype and 46% had the 637GG genotype (both containing the mutant G allele); 59% of the VV cases had the 60RH genotype. The mutant 637GG genotype was most frequent in FV (78%) and VV (67%) cases. The heterozygous 60RH genotype was most frequent in AV (50%), FV (56%), and VV (59%) cases. Despite the lower frequency of SV cases (2%) in our population, all these cases had the heterozygous 637DG and 60RH genotypes.

Table 3: Stratification of TAP1-D637G and PSMB9-R60H genotypes associated with different clinical types of vitiligo.

Vitiligo type
Number of cases (%)
TAP1-D637G
PSMB9-R60H

(%)
(%)

DD
DG
GG
RR
RH
HH

VV
44 (51.2)
0 (0.0)
24 (54.5)
20 (45.5)
10 (22.7)
26 (59.1)
8 (18.2)

UV
6 (7.0)
0 (0.0)
4 (66.7)
2 (33.3)
2 (33.3)
2 (33.3)
2 (33.3)

FV
18 (20.9)
0 (0.0)
4 (22.2)
14 (77.8)
6 (33.3)
10 (55.6)
2 (11.1)

AV
16 (18.6)
0 (0.0)
10 (62.5)
6 (37.5)
6 (37.5)
8 (50.0)
2 (12.5)

SV
2 (2.3)
0 (0.0)
2 (100)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
2 (100)
0 (0.0)

AV: acral/acrofacial vitiligo; FV: focal vitiligo; SV: segmental vitiligo; UV: universalis vitiligo; VV: vulgaris vitiligo.

“” is the number of genotypes in TAP1 or PSMB9 variants.

As for genotype-phenotype correlation, 64% of cases with the heterozygous 637DG genotype and 64% of cases with the heterozygous 60RH genotype were linked with active phenotypes (Table 4). There were no associations between the D637G and R60H genotypes and active/stable phenotypes (OR = 0.66, for D637G and OR = 1.2, for R60H). Moreover, there was a significant association between the active and stable phenotypes and the TAP1 polymorphism (OR = 2.70, ) but not between the active and stable phenotypes and the PSMB9-R60H polymorphism (OR = 1.0, ).

Table 4: TAP1-D637G and PSMB9-R60H genotype distribution and allelic frequencies for active versus stable vitiligo phenotypes.

Phenotype
Number of cases (%)
TAP1-D637G genotypesa
Alleles
PSMB9-R60H genotypes
Allele

(%)
(frequency)
(%)
(frequency)

DD
DG
GG
D
G
RR
RH
HH
R
H

Active
52 (60.5)
0 (0.0)
33 (63.5)
19 (36.5)
33 (0.32)
71 (0.68)
9 (17.3)
33 (63.5)
10 (19.2)
51 (0.49)
53 (0.51)

Stable
34 (39.5)
0 (0.0)
10 (29.4)
24 (70.6)
10 (0.15)
58 (0.85)
5 (14.7)
24 (70.6)
5 (14.7)
34 (0.50)
34 (0.50)

OR = 0.66, 95% (CI, 0.01–33.9),
OR = 2.70, 95% (CI, 1.2–5.9),
OR = 1.2, 95% (CI, 0.4–4.0),
OR = 1.0, 95% (CI, 0.5–1.8),

,
,
,
,

CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.

aTAP1-D637G genotype differences between progressive and stable vitiligo cases.

b = no significant difference.

c = a significant difference.

4. Discussion

This study investigated the distribution of two biallelic variants of the TAP1-rs1135216 and PSMB9-rs17587 loci, corresponding to amino acid positions 637 and 60, in a group of 86 Saudi patients and 86 healthy controls. The TAP1 637G and PSMB9 60H mutant alleles were found to significantly increase the risk of vitiligo (fivefold and twofold, resp.) when compared with wild-type alleles ( and , resp.).

The TAP1 637G and PSMB9 60H mutant alleles were found to significantly increase the risk of vitiligo (fivefold and twofold, resp.) when compared with wild-type alleles ( and , resp.). An earlier study in Caucasians revealed a significant association between vitiligo and TAP1-rs1135216 () but a nonsignificant result between vitiligo and PSMB9-rs17587 () [22].

Our study showed that VV (the major subtype of vitiligo in our sample) was remarkably associated with the mutant 637G and mutant 60H alleles of the polymorphisms we studied. There were no significant associations between the phenotypes of vitiligo (i.e., active, stable) and either the D637G or the R60H polymorphic marker ( and , resp.). It was clear that only the mutant 637G allele significantly affected the progression or the stability of vitiligo among our cases ().

The present study also identified some interesting clinical findings. Type 1 diabetes mellitus was seen in 5.8% of our vitiligo cases, although no significant association was found between the two (). However, the frequency of type 1 diabetes in our vitiligo cases was twofold higher than that reported in Caucasians [27], Turks [28], and Jordanians [29]. The higher frequency of diabetes might be due to either the higher incidence of diabetes among the Saudi community or the interaction of multiple genes affecting both vitiligo and diabetes. Moreover, Somorin and Krahn [30] found vitiligo to be associated with diabetes mellitus in 5% of vitiligo cases but mostly in the form of type 2 diabetes.

Patients with vitiligo have a strong predisposition to develop other autoimmune conditions, particularly those affecting the thyroid [31]. Indeed, the prevalence of autoimmune thyroid disease in vitiligo cases has been estimated at 14%, and the risk of developing this type of disease has been reported to be 2.5-fold higher for patients with vitiligo than for individuals without vitiligo [31]. The prevalence of thyroid pathology in Saudis with vitiligo (16.3%, ) was higher in our study than that reported in Turkish (4.4%) [28] or Chinese (6.8%) [32] individuals with vitiligo. In a cohort study of Caucasians, 5.7% of first-degree relatives (parents and siblings only) of vitiligo patients were reported as having clinical autoimmune thyroid disease, which was more than twice the population frequency () [27].

As generally reported, vitiligo affects both sexes equally. Although the age of onset is variable, most patients develop symptoms between 10 and 30 years of age [33]. The mean age of onset in our Saudi cases—11.5 years (range, 2–47 years)—was consistent with a previous Saudi study [34]. Most populations, with the exception of those in Egypt [35], have reported a later mean age of onset, of at least 21 years [22, 27–29]. In line with a low age of onset in Saudi Arabia, more than 55% of the cases in our study had an age of onset under 10 years, and about 89% had one under 20 years.

The proportion of Caucasian families with aggregated cases of vitiligo has been estimated at 20% [36]. In the Saudi community, about 54% of marriages are consanguineous [37], and the incidence of vitiligo is proportionally higher, 16% among our Saudi sample, with positive family history reaching 40%. An epidemiological Saudi study from the Northern province of Arar has recently reported that consanguinity highly increases the incidence of the disease, with a frequency of 65% (45 out of 69 patients) [38]. Consanguinity, which is relatively frequent in the Middle East and some other parts of the world, is usually socioeconomically and culturally motivated and can be genetically harmful.

The present study had some limitations. First, our post hoc statistical analysis for the rs17587 SNP revealed a power of 49% among our 172 participants. Recruiting more participants (i.e., 368 participants, aiming for a power of 80%) in both case and control groups within a reasonable time frame from a few outpatient clinics would have been difficult. Hence, replication of our results through larger, multicenter genetic association studies will be important. Second, we restricted this study to two polymorphic markers that we hypothesized to be significantly associated with the disease. Spritz and colleagues [39] have previously described genome-wide linkage analyses among multiplex vitiligo families, aimed at detecting the locations of genes that contribute to the risk of vitiligo [29, 39, 40]. These studies identified several linkage signals that met formal genome-wide criteria for “significant” linkage [41]. More linkage studies based on a whole-genome approach instead of a single or a few candidate genes may be useful for discovering new genes associated with susceptibility to vitiligo.

5. Conclusions

This is the first study, to our knowledge, to report associations between the allelic variants of rs1135216 and rs17587 loci and vitiligo in the Saudi population. We found that one copy of the mutant alleles TAP1 637G and PSMB9 60H can influence the development of, or induce the progression or appearance of, new depigmented lesions. The identification of new susceptibility genes has opened new avenues for exploring the underlying disease mechanisms for vitiligo.

Conflict of Interests

The authors report no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Saudi patients with vitiligo and to the healthy participants for their willingness to participate in this research. They also thank the sympathetic nurses and dermatology therapists.

References

J. A. Mosenson, A. Zloza, J. Klarquist, A. J. Barfuss, J. A. Guevara-Patino, and I. C. Le Poole, “HSP70i is a critical component of the immune response leading to vitiligo,” Pigment Cell and Melanoma Research, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 88–98, 2012.

S. Strömberg, M. G. Björklund, A. Asplund et al., “Transcriptional profiling of melanocytes from patients with vitiligo vulgaris,” Pigment Cell and Melanoma Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 162–171, 2008.

K. Abdel-Hafez, M. A. Abdel-Aty, and E. R. M. Hofny, “Prevalence of skin diseases in rural areas of Assiut Governorate, Upper Egypt,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 887–892, 2003.

H. Fathy, S. El-Mongy, N. I. Baker, Z. Abdel-Azim, and A. El-Gilany, “Prevalence of skin diseases among students with disabilities in Mansoura, Egypt,” Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 416–424, 2004.

R. M. Halder and J. L. Chappell, “Vitiligo update,” Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 86–92, 2009.

E. M. Shajil, S. Chatterjee, D. Agrawal, T. Bagchi, and R. Begum, “Vitiligo: pathomechanisms and genetic polymorphism of susceptible genes,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 526–539, 2006.

H. Shah, A. Mehta, and B. Astik, “Clinical and sociodemographic study of vitiligo,” The Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, vol. 74, no. 6, p. 701, 2008.

W. Y. Al-Saeed, K. M. Al-Dawood, I. A. Bukhari, and A. A. Bahnassy, “Prevalence and pattern of skin disorders among female schoolchildren in Eastern Saudi Arabia,” Saudi Medical Journal, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 227–234, 2006.

H. A. Al-Shobaili, “Correlation of clinical efficacy and psychosocial impact on vitiligo patients by excimer laser treatment,” Annals of Saudi Medicine, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 115–121, 2014.

M. Sandoval-Cruz, M. García-Carrasco, R. Sánchez-Porras et al., “Immunopathogenesis of vitiligo,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 762–765, 2011.

K. U. Schallreuter, M. A. E. L. Salem, S. Holtz, and A. Panske, “Basic evidence for epidermal H₂O₂/ONOO(-)–mediated oxidation/nitration in segmental vitiligo is supported by repigmentation of skin and eyelashes after reduction of epidermal H₂O₂ with topical NB-UVB-activated pseudocatalase PC-KUS,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 3113–3122, 2013.

N. Malhotra and M. Dytoc, “The pathogenesis of vitiligo,” Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 153–172, 2013.

R. A. Spritz, “The genetics of generalized vitiligo and associated autoimmune diseases,” Pigment Cell Research, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 271–278, 2007.

R. Tazi-Ahnini, A. J. G. McDonagh, D. A. Wengraf et al., “The autoimmune regulator gene (AIRE) is strongly associated with vitiligo,” The British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 159, no. 3, pp. 591–596, 2008.

D. Parcej and R. Tampé, “ABC proteins in antigen translocation and viral inhibition,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 572–580, 2010.

M. Basler, C. J. Kirk, and M. Groettrup, “The immunoproteasome in antigen processing and other immunological functions,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 74–80, 2013.

I. Djilali-Saiah, S. Caillat-Zucman, J. Schmitz, M. L. Chaves-Vieira, and J.-F. Bach, “Polymorphism of antigen processing (TAP, LMP) and HLA class II genes in celiac disease,” Human Immunology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 8–16, 1994.

S. Kumagai, S. Kanagawa, A. Morinobu et al., “Association of a new allele of the TAP2 gene, TAP2 *Bky2 (Val⁵⁷⁷), with susceptibility to Sjogren's syndrome,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1685–1692, 1997.

G. Y. Deng, A. Muir, N. K. Maclaren, and J.-X. She, “Association of LMP2 and LMP7 genes within the major histocompatibility complex with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: population and family studies,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 528–534, 1995.

X. Zhu, Y. Zhang, Q. Wang, and F. Wang, “Polymorphisms of TAP, LMP and HLA-DM genes in the Chinese,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 372–375, 2000.

S. Scheffler, U. Kuckelkorn, K. Egerer et al., “Autoimmune reactivity against the 20S-proteasome includes immunosubunits LMP2 (β1i), MECL1 (β2i) and LMP7 (β5i),” Rheumatology, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 622–626, 2008.

C. B. Casp, J.-X. She, and W. T. McCormack, “Genes of the LMP/TAP cluster are associated with the human autoimmune disease vitiligo,” Genes and Immunity, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 492–499, 2003.

M. T. Tayeb, “Genetic variations of vitiligo among Saudi patients,” Middle-East Journal of Science Research, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 266–271, 2011.

A. Abanmi, F. A. Harthi, R. A. Baqami et al., “Association of HLA loci alleles and antigens in Saudi patients with vitiligo,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 298, no. 7, pp. 347–352, 2006.

A. Abanmi, F. Al Harthi, A. Zouman, et al., “Association of Interleukin-10 gene promoter polymorphisms in Saudi patients with Vitiligo,” Disease Markers, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 51–57, 2008.

N. A. Elhawary, M. T. Tayeb, S. Abdel-Ghafar, M. Rashad, and A.-A. Alkhotani, “TNF-238 polymorphism may predict bronchopulmonary dysplasia among preterm infants in the Egyptian population,” Pediatric Pulmonology, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 699–706, 2013.

A. Alkhateeb, P. R. Fain, A. Thody, D. C. Bennett, and R. A. Spritz, “Epidemiology of vitiligo and associated autoimmune diseases in Caucasian probands and their families,” Pigment Cell Research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 208–214, 2003.

Ö. Arýcan, K. Koç, and L. Ersoy, “Clinical characterislics in 113 Turkish vitiligo patients,” Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina, Pannonica et Adriatica, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 129–132, 2008.

A. Alkhateeb, N. A.-D. Marzouka, and F. Qarqaz, “SMOC2 gene variant and the risk of vitiligo in Jordanian Arabs,” European Journal of Dermatology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 701–704, 2010.

A. O. Somorin and P. M. Krahn, “Vitiligo: a study of 112 cases,” Annals of Saudi Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 125–127, 1997.

C. Vrijman, M. W. Kroon, J. Limpens et al., “The prevalence of thyroid disease in patients with vitiligo: a systematic review,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 167, no. 6, pp. 1224–1235, 2012.

Y. K. Shong and J. A. Kim, “Vitiligo in autoimmune thyroid disease,” Thyroidology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 89–91, 1991.

D. B. Mosher, T. B. Fitzpatrick, and J. B. Ortanne, “Disorders of pigmentation, hipomelanoses and hypermelanoses,” in Dermatology in General Medicine, I. M. Freedberg, A. Z. Eisen, and T. B. Fitzpatrick, Eds., pp. 936–945, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 5th edition, 1999.

A. Alzolibani, “Genetic epidemiology and heritability of vitiligo in the Qassim region of Saudi Arabia,” Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina, Pannonica et Adriatica, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 119–125, 2009.

N. S. Seif Eldin, S. Teama, K. Amro, H. M. Farag, S. M. Nour Eldin, and N. A. Elhawary, “Polymorphisms of TAP 1/LMP 7 loci in Egyptian patients with vitiligo,” Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 241–249, 2006.

S.-K. Hann and J. Nordlund, Vitiligo, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, 2000.

P. Turnpenny and S. Ellard, Emery's Elements of Medical Genetics, Churchill Livingstone, 14th edition, 2013.

D. A. Alenizi, “Consanguinity pattern and heritability of vitiligo in Arar, Saudi Arabia,” Journal of Family and Community Medicine, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 13–16, 2014.

R. A. Spritz, K. Gowan, D. C. Bennett, and P. R. Fain, “Novel vitiligo susceptibility loci on chromosomes 7 (AIS2) and 8 (AIS3), confirmation of SLEV1 on chromosome 17, and their roles in an autoimmune diathesis,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 188–191, 2004.

R. Czajkowski and K. Męcińska-Jundziłł, “Current aspects of vitiligo genetics,” Postępy Dermatologii i Alergologii, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 247–255, 2014.

A. Alkhateeb, P. R. Fain, and R. A. Spritz, “Candidate functional promoter variant in the FOXD3 melanoblast developmental regulator gene in autosomal dominant vitiligo,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 388–391, 2005.