Disease Markers
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 9356804, 2 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9356804

Letter to the Editor

Response to: Comment on “circSMARCA5 Functions as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker for Gastric Cancer”

Juan Cai,1,2 Zhiqiang Chen,³ and Xueliang Zuo2,3,4

¹Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China
²Key Laboratory of Non-coding RNA Transformation Research of Anhui Higher Education Institution (Wannan Medical College), Wuhu, Anhui, China
³Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
⁴Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Xueliang Zuo; zuoxueliang0202@126.com

Received 21 June 2019; Accepted 26 August 2019; Published 23 September 2019

Academic Editor: Anja Hviid Simonsen

Copyright © 2019 Juan Cai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

We are very grateful to Dr. Farid Rahimi and Dr. Amin Talebi Bezmin Abadi for their valuable comments and suggestions [1] on our recent article entitled “circSMARCA5 Functions as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker for Gastric Cancer” [2]. We have perused the comments and hope the provided responses will address the concerns.

As previously reported, the functions of circSMARCA5 in different cancers are discrepant. The expression level of circSMARCA5 is downregulated in most types of cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma [3, 4], glioblastoma [5, 6], and cervical cancer [7]. In prostate cancer, however, upregulated circSMARCA5 expression level is observed [8]. In our study, we confirmed the downregulation of circSMARCA5 using both gastric cancer (GC) tissue and blood samples. Consistently, all the published studies [3–8] used tissue samples to investigate the dysregulation of circSMARCA5 in cancers. Notably, the increased expression level of circSMARCA5 was also determined using prostate cancer samples and the matched normal prostate tissues [8]. circSMARCA5 is an androgen-induced circRNA in prostate cancer [8], and the activation of androgen receptor pathway is a common driver of prostate cancer progression [9, 10]. Therefore, the discrepancies in circSMARCA5 expression patterns might be attributed to the complexity of molecular events that occurred during the onsets of different types of cancers. GC is an aggressive illness with a dismal survival outcome; thus, exploring potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers is of great importance. For the diagnostic purpose, noninvasive approaches such as liquid biopsies could be developed utilizing plasma circSMARCA5. Tissue circSMARCA5 level might be more useful for patients undergoing radical surgery to predict the clinical prognosis.

With the advances in high-throughput omics technologies, the identification of promising biomarkers has substantially accelerated during the last decades. Biomarker development entails multiple phases, from the discovery of candidate molecules, to validation with training and verification cohorts, followed with multicenter independent cohorts, to a biomarker-based randomized clinical trial, and finally to general clinical application [11]. Noncoding RNAs have become a novel field of biomarker development in GC [12–14]. As discussed in the limitations in our study [2], we proposed the potential clinical value of circSMARCA5 for GC based on data from a single medical center with a relatively small sample size. There is still a long way to go in the pursuit of the application of circSMARCA5 in clinical care of GC patients. Future prospective studies shall be performed in more centers and other populations to further evaluate the clinical significance of circSMARCA5 for GC.

As mentioned, it may be better to employ the ΔCT method underlying qRT-PCR to control for differences in expression of circRNAs. However, almost all previous reports have used linear RNA, among which GAPDH has been employed most frequently, for circSMARCA5 normalization [3, 5–8]. To avoid discrepancies arising from methodological approaches, we adopted GAPDH to control for differences in circSMARCA5 expression. Although GAPDH can be deregulated in tumor cells, there is still no perfect internal reference that remains totally unchanged in cancer cells. Normalizing circRNA expression to the geometric mean of several housekeeper genes including GAPDH for qRT-PCR may be one potential solution [15]. Nonetheless, numerous studies still use GAPDH as a quantifying guide and control gene for circRNA in cancer [16–20].

circRNA has become a rising star in the field of cancer biology, and increasing studies are aimed at elucidating the molecular mechanisms and clinical values of circRNAs in cancer [21, 22]. It would be promising yet challenging to further investigate the important roles of circRNAs in GC.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Juan Cai and Zhiqiang Chen contributed equally to this work.

References

F. Rahimi and A. Talebi Bezmin Abadi, “Comment on “circSMARCA5 functions as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for gastric cancer”,” Disease Markers, vol. 2019, Article ID 2790379, 2 pages, 2019.

J. Cai, Z. Chen, and X. Zuo, “circSMARCA5 functions as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for gastric cancer,” Disease Markers, vol. 2019, Article ID 2473652, 11 pages, 2019.

Z. Li, Y. Zhou, G. Yang et al., “Using circular RNA SMARCA5 as a potential novel biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 492, pp. 37–44, 2019.

J. Yu, Q. G. Xu, Z. G. Wang et al., “Circular RNA cSMARCA5 inhibits growth and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1214–1227, 2018.

D. Barbagallo, A. Caponnetto, M. Cirnigliaro et al., “CircSMARCA5 inhibits migration of glioblastoma multiforme cells by regulating a molecular axis involving splicing factors SRSF1/SRSF3/PTB,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 480, 2018.

D. Barbagallo, A. Caponnetto, D. Brex et al., “CircSMARCA5 regulates VEGFA mRNA splicing and angiogenesis in glioblastoma multiforme through the binding of SRSF1,” Cancers, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 194, 2019.

J.-J. D. A. I. C. TIAN and L. LIANG, “Involvement of circular RNA SMARCA5/microRNA-620 axis in the regulation of cervical cancer cell proliferation, invasion and migration,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 22, no. 24, pp. 8589–8598, 2018.

Z. Kong, X. Wan, Y. Zhang et al., “Androgen-responsive circular RNA circSMARCA5 is up-regulated and promotes cell proliferation in prostate cancer,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 493, no. 3, pp. 1217–1223, 2017.

K. A. Cotter and M. A. Rubin, “Sequence of events in prostate cancer,” Nature, vol. 560, no. 7720, pp. 557–559, 2018.

D. Y. Takeda, S. Spisák, J.-H. Seo et al., “A somatically acquired enhancer of the androgen receptor is a noncoding driver in advanced prostate cancer,” Cell, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 422–432.e413, 2018.

S. Paczesny, “Biomarkers for posttransplantation outcomes,” Blood, vol. 131, no. 20, pp. 2193–2204, 2018.

T. Matsuoka and M. Yashiro, “Biomarkers of gastric cancer: current topics and future perspective,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 24, no. 26, pp. 2818–2832, 2018.

T. T. Sun, J. He, Q. Liang et al., “LncRNA GClnc1 promotes gastric carcinogenesis and may act as a modular scaffold of WDR5 and KAT2A complexes to specify the histone modification pattern,” Cancer Discovery, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 784–801, 2016.

W. Zhuo, Y. Liu, S. Li et al., “Long noncoding RNA GMAN, up-regulated in gastric cancer tissues, is associated with metastasis in patients and promotes translation of Ephrin A1 by competitively binding GMAN-AS,” Gastroenterology, vol. 156, no. 3, pp. 676–691.e611, 2019.

L. Verduci, M. Ferraiuolo, A. Sacconi et al., “The oncogenic role of circPVT1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is mediated through the mutant p53/YAP/TEAD transcription-competent complex,” Genome Biology, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 237, 2017.

W. Li, Y. C. Song, H. Zhang et al., “Decreased expression of Hsa_circ_00001649 in gastric cancer and its clinical significance,” Disease Markers, vol. 2017, Article ID 4587698, 6 pages, 2017.

X. Zhang, H. Zhou, W. Jing et al., “The circular RNA hsa_circ_0001445 regulates the proliferation and migration of hepatocellular carcinoma and may serve as a diagnostic biomarker,” Disease Markers, vol. 2018, Article ID 3073467, 9 pages, 2018.

L. Chen, A. Nan, N. Zhang et al., “Circular RNA 100146 functions as an oncogene through direct binding to miR-361-3p and miR-615-5p in non-small cell lung cancer,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 13, 2019.

L. Xu, X. Feng, X. Hao et al., “CircSETD3 (Hsa_circ_0000567) acts as a sponge for microRNA-421 inhibiting hepatocellular carcinoma growth,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 38, no. 1, p. 98, 2019.

F. Xie, Y. Li, M. Wang et al., “Circular RNA BCRC-3 suppresses bladder cancer proliferation through miR-182-5p/p27 axis,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 144, 2018.

J. N. Vo, M. Cieslik, Y. Zhang et al., “The landscape of circular RNA in cancer,” Cell, vol. 176, no. 4, pp. 869–881.e813, 2019.

S. Chen, V. Huang, X. Xu et al., “Widespread and functional RNA circularization in localized prostate cancer,” Cell, vol. 176, no. 4, pp. 831–843.e822, 2019.