Depression Research and Treatment
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 145483, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/145483

Research Article

No Association of BDNF, COMT, MAOA, SLC6A3, and SLC6A4 Genes and Depressive Symptoms in a Sample of Healthy Colombian Subjects

Yeimy González-Giraldo,¹ Andrés Camargo,² Sandra López-León,³ and Diego A. Forero¹

¹Laboratory of NeuroPsychiatric Genetics, Biomedical Sciences Research Group, School of Medicine, Universidad Antonio Nariño, Bogotá, Colombia
²School of Nursing, Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales (UDCA), Bogotá, Colombia
³Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ 07936, USA

Received 18 June 2015; Revised 10 September 2015; Accepted 20 September 2015

Academic Editor: Bernard Sabbe

Copyright © 2015 Yeimy González-Giraldo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Background. Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the second cause of years lived with disability around the world. A large number of studies have been carried out to identify genetic risk factors for MDD and related endophenotypes, mainly in populations of European and Asian descent, with conflicting results. The main aim of the current study was to analyze the possible association of five candidate genes and depressive symptoms in a Colombian sample of healthy subjects. Methods and Materials. The Spanish adaptation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was applied to one hundred eighty-eight healthy Colombian subjects. Five functional polymorphisms were genotyped using PCR-based assays: BDNF-Val66Met (rs6265), COMT-Val158Met (rs4680), SLC6A4-HTTLPR (rs4795541), MAOA-uVNTR, and SLC6A3-VNTR (rs28363170). Result. We did not find significant associations with scores of depressive symptoms, derived from the HADS, for any of the five candidate genes (nominal values >0.05). In addition, we did not find evidence of significant gene-gene interactions. Conclusion. This work is one of the first studies of candidate genes for depressive symptoms in a Latin American sample. Study of additional genetic and epigenetic variants, taking into account other pathophysiological theories, will help to identify novel candidates for MDD in populations around the world.

1. Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a current challenge for mental health research [1]. Average global lifetime prevalence of MDD is around 11.2%, showing regional differences [2]. According to data from the Global Burden of Disease Study, MDD was responsible for 8.2% of global years lived with disability (YLDs) and for 2.5% of global disability adjusted life years (DALYs) [1], being the second cause of YLDs around the world [3] and the main neuropsychiatric disorder in terms of DALYs [4].

Heritability for MDD has been estimated about 0.37 [5, 6]. A large number of studies have been carried out to identify genetic risk factors for MDD [7, 8]. A field synopsis for MD genetics carried out meta-analyses for 20 polymorphisms in 18 genes and variants in 5 candidate genes were found to be significant (APOE, GNB3, MTHFR, SLC6A3, and SLC6A4) [9]. Recently, genome-wide association studies for MDD have been carried out, with no main significant results [7]. In the context of the study of endophenotypes for MDD [10, 11], several works have explored the possible association of candidate genes with depressive symptoms in healthy subjects [12–16]. Almost all of those studies included were carried out in populations of European and Asian descent [9, 17]. The main objective of this study was to test the possible association of five polymorphisms in candidate genes (BDNF, COMT, MAOA, SLC6A3, and SLC6A4) with depressive symptoms in a Colombian sample of healthy subjects.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

One hundred eighty-eight healthy young subjects were included in this study, with a mean age of 22.2 ± 5.6 years: 137 females (72.9%) and 51 males (27.1%). Included subjects were unrelated, had all four grandparents born in Colombia, and were recruited from a university in Bogotá, Colombia. The population living in Bogotá, the capital city of Colombia, has a main Southern European genetic background, with historical admixture with Native Americans [18, 19]. Participants with self-reported history of neuropsychiatric diseases, such as depression or anxiety disorders, were excluded [20]. This study was approved by the respective Institutional Ethics Committee (Universidad Antonio Nariño) and all participants provided written informed consent [21].

2.2. Phenotypic Measurements

Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire, which was used to collect sociodemographic variables (age, sex, and personal and familial history of neuropsychiatric disorders). The Spanish adaptation [22, 23] of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [24] was applied, which is a well-validated and commonly used scale to measure depressive symptoms [25, 26]. It includes 14 Likert-type items rated on a 4-point scale (0–3), total scores ranged from 0 to 42, and it has two subfactors: depression (HADS-D) and anxiety (HADS-A) [24], each one with 7 items (scores for HADS-D and HADS-A: 0–21 for each subfactor).

2.3. DNA Genotyping

Five functional polymorphisms in candidate genes were studied: BDNF-Val66Met (rs6265), COMT-Val158Met (rs4680), SLC6A4-HTTLPR (rs4795541), MAOA-uVNTR, and SLC6A3-VNTR (rs28363170). A salting-out method was used to extract genomic DNA from peripheral blood of participants. DNA samples were adjusted to a final concentration of 10ng/µL and stored at 4°C until being used [27]. Genotyping assays for the 5 candidate genes were carried out as previously described [18, 20, 28, 29], using methods based on qPCR and conventional PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis. PCR reactions were carried out in a Labnet MultiGene thermal cycler (Labnet International Inc., Edison, NJ, USA) and their products were separated at 140V in 2% agarose gel stained with SYBR Safe (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Polymerase chain reactions contained 2μL of genomic DNA (~50ng), 1.5mM of MgCl₂, 10x reaction buffer, 1.0µM of each primer, 1mM of dNTPs, 1M of Betaine, and 0.8U of Taq polymerase (Bioline, London, United Kingdom) in a total volume of 20μL. Fragment sizes were determined by comparison to molecular weight markers (HyperLadder V, Bioline, London, United Kingdom). A CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR system (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used for genotyping methods based on qPCR. A random subsample (10% of subjects) was reanalyzed for both polymorphisms to assure consistency in the genetic results. Additionally, all genotypes were checked by two different researchers in order to confirm and validate the results [30].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Identification of subjects with HADS values located ±3SD from the mean of the sample was used to detect extreme outliers. SNPStats program [31] was used for calculation of allele and genotype frequencies and for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium analysis (with test). It was also used for the exploration of the association of genotypes in candidate genes with quantitative measures of depressive symptoms (HADS-D scores), using a linear regression model, corrected for age and sex. Categorical analysis was based on the use of a common cutoff score (8) for HADS-D [32]. test was used to compare genotype frequencies between the two groups (normal and high HADS-D scores). Exploration of gene-gene interactions was carried out with the Quantitative Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction (QMDR) approach (using the MDR software, version 3.0.2) [33, 34] and the Multilocus Genetic Profile (MGP) method [35]. A nominal value of <0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Bonferroni method was used to correct for multiple testing: with 2 subscales and 5 polymorphisms, a value <0.005 (0.05 divided by 10) was considered as a threshold for corrected values.

3. Results

Genotype frequencies for the 5 candidate polymorphisms in our current study are shown in Table 1 and they were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ( values >0.05, test). Mean scores for HADS-D and HADS-A in the total sample were 3.44 (SE: 0.20) and 7.05 (SE: 0.27), respectively. No extreme outliers for HADS scores were identified in the current sample. Cronbach’s alphas for HADS-D and HADS-A were 0.689 and 0.799, respectively.

Table 1: Associations between depressive symptoms and BDNF, COMT, SLC6A3, MAOA, and SLC6A4 genes in a Colombian sample.

Gene/SNP
Genotypes
Frequencies (%)
HADS-D mean (SD)
HWE
value
value

BDNF-rs6265
G/G
145 (0.77)
3.46 (0.23)
0.094
0.98
0.88

G/A
37 (0.19)
3.35 (0.44)

A/A
6 (0.03)
3.5 (1.12)

COMT-rs4680
G/G
75 (0.40)
3.55 (0.32)
0.35
0.83
0.96

G/A
92 (0.49)
3.40 (0.27)

A/A
21 (0.11)
3.19 (0.62)

SLC6A3-rs28363170
10/10
117 (0.66)
3.6 (0.26)

0.34

10/9
53 (0.30)
3.06 (0.34)
0.25
0.43

9/9
10 (0.06)
3 (0.68)

MAOA-VNTR
4/4
77 (0.43)
3.42 (0.32)

0.11

4/3
65 (0.36)
3.09 (0.28)
0.58
0.47

3/3
38 (0.21)
3.63 (0.49)

SLC6A4-rs4795541
S/S
49 (0.26)
3.12 (0.4)

0.85

S/L
92 (0.49)
3.68 (0.28)
0.88
0.47

L/L
45 (0.24)
3.43 (0.42)

HWE calculated in females. Quantitative association with total scores for HADS-D. Categorical association with a cutoff point of 8 (normal and high HADS-D scores).

HWE: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ( value); BDNF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor; COMT: catechol-O-methyltransferase; SLC6A3: dopamine transporter; MAOA: monoamine oxidase A; SLC6A4: serotonin transporter.

A linear regression model, correcting for sex and age, did not show significant associations for any of the five candidate polymorphisms and HADS-D scores (nominal values >0.05) (Table 1). A categorical analysis, comparing genotype frequencies between normal and high HADS-D scores, did not show significant differences (nominal values >0.05) (Table 1). Results from the association analysis for the 5 candidate genes and HADS-A were also not significant (nominal values >0.05). Exploration of possible gene-gene interactions did not find significant associations, using the QMDR method ( value: 0.25) or the MGP approach ( value: 0.858).

4. Discussion

MDD is a current challenge, around the world, for mental health research [1]. A large number of studies have been carried out to identify genetic risk factors for MDD [7], mainly in populations of European and Asian descent, with conflicting results [9]. Study of endophenotypes for MDD [10], which involves the exploration of the possible associations of candidate genes with depressive symptoms in healthy subjects [12–16], represents interesting approaches for the identification of novel candidates for MDD [11].

In the current study, we did not find significant associations for any of the five candidate polymorphisms and HADS-D scores (nominal values >0.05) in a Colombian sample of healthy subjects. A categorical analysis, comparing genotype frequencies between normal and high HADS-D scores, defined with a commonly used cutoff score [32], did not show significant differences (nominal values >0.05). Exploration of possible gene-gene interactions did not find significant associations, using the QMDR method or the MGP approach ( values >0.05).

MDD is main priority for health research in Colombia, as in other countries. Estimates of lifetime and 12 months’ prevalence of MDD in Colombia are 11.8 and 5.3%, in comparison to other Latin American countries such as Mexico and Peru (7.6/3.7 and 6.4/3.7%, resp.) [2]. The HADS-D scale, a well-validated and commonly used tool [32], has been previously used for genetic studies of depression [36–39]. A search in HuGeNavigator [40] shows that 384 genes have been explored as candidates for MDD in 1180 studies, in comparison to 924/2259 for BP, which has lifetime prevalence of 1% [41]. BDNF and SLC6A4 genes are the two top candidate genes for MDD, in terms of number of published studies.

To our knowledge, this is one of the first genetic studies of depressive symptomatology in Latin American subjects. It highlights the importance of studying genetic factors for MDD in other ethnicities, particularly developing countries [42, 43]. Future studies with larger sample sizes using other validated depression scales (such as CES-D) and including psychiatric patients [10] will facilitate the identification of candidate genes for endophenotypes for depression in Latin American populations. The forthcoming application of exome sequencing approaches [44] will allow the discovery of rare variants for MDD, in conjunction with epigenomic approaches [45] and the study of common variants in genes involved in other pathophysiological mechanisms for MDD [46, 47].

Disclosure

The current address for Yeimy González-Giraldo is Department of Nutrition and Biochemistry, School of Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a research grant from Universidad Antonio Nariño (VCTI-UAN, project 20131079). Yeimy González-Giraldo was supported by a fellowship from VCTI-UAN (Young Scientists Program).

References

A. J. Ferrari, F. J. Charlson, R. E. Norman et al., “Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 10, no. 11, Article ID e1001547, 2013.

R. C. Kessler, N. A. Sampson, P. Berglund et al., “Anxious and non-anxious major depressive disorder in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys,” Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 210–226, 2015.

T. Vos, A. D. Flaxman, M. Naghavi et al., “Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010,” The Lancet, vol. 380, no. 9859, pp. 2163–2196, 2012.

H. A. Whiteford, A. J. Ferrari, L. Degenhardt, V. Feigin, and T. Vos, “The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 2, Article ID e0116820, 2015.

P. F. Sullivan, M. C. Neale, and K. S. Kendler, “Genetic epidemiology of major depression: review and meta-analysis,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 157, no. 10, pp. 1552–1562, 2000.

K. S. Kendler, M. Gatz, C. O. Gardner, and N. L. Pedersen, “A Swedish national twin study of lifetime major depression,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 109–114, 2006.

J. Flint and K. S. Kendler, “The genetics of major depression,” Neuron, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 484–503, 2014.

E. C. Dunn, R. C. Brown, Y. Dai et al., “Genetic determinants of depression: recent findings and future directions,” Harvard Review of Psychiatry, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2015.

S. López-León, A. C. J. W. Janssens, A. M. González-Zuloeta Ladd et al., “Meta-analyses of genetic studies on major depressive disorder,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 772–785, 2008.

B. L. Goldstein and D. N. Klein, “A review of selected candidate endophenotypes for depression,” Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 417–427, 2014.

G. Hasler, W. C. Drevets, H. K. Manji, and D. S. Charney, “Discovering endophenotypes for major depression,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1765–1781, 2004.

K. M. Pearson-Fuhrhop, E. C. Dunn, S. Mortero et al., “Dopamine genetic risk score predicts depressive symptoms in healthy adults and adults with depression,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 5, Article ID e93772, 2014.

L. Christiansen, Q. Tan, M. Iachina et al., “Candidate gene polymorphisms in the serotonergic pathway: influence on depression symptomatology in an elderly population,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 223–230, 2007.

H. M. Kravitz, I. Janssen, F. E. Lotrich, D. M. Kado, and J. T. Bromberger, “Sex steroid hormone gene polymorphisms and depressive symptoms in women at midlife,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 119, no. 9, pp. S87–S93, 2006.

N. Goldman, D. A. Glei, Y.-H. Lin, and M. Weinstein, “The serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR): allelic variation and links with depressive symptoms,” Depression and Anxiety, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 260–269, 2010.

J. Strohmaier, M. Amelang, L. A. Hothorn et al., “The psychiatric vulnerability gene CACNA1C and its sex-specific relationship with personality traits, resilience factors and depressive symptoms in the general population,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 607–613, 2013.

J. M. Gatt, K. L. O. Burton, L. M. Williams, and P. R. Schofield, “Specific and common genes implicated across major mental disorders: a review of meta-analysis studies,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 60, pp. 1–13, 2015.

D. A. Ojeda, C. S. Perea, A. Suárez et al., “Common functional polymorphisms in SLC6A4 and COMT genes are associated with circadian phenotypes in a South American sample,” Neurological Sciences, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2014.

B. A. Benitez, D. A. Forero, G. H. Arboleda et al., “Exploration of genetic susceptibility factors for Parkinson's disease in a South American sample,” Journal of Genetics, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 229–232, 2010.

D. A. Ojeda, C. L. Niño, S. López-León, A. Camargo, A. Adan, and D. A. Forero, “A functional polymorphism in the promoter region of MAOA gene is associated with daytime sleepiness in healthy subjects,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 337, no. 1-2, pp. 176–179, 2014.

L. M. Beskow, W. Burke, J. F. Merz et al., “Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 286, no. 18, pp. 2315–2321, 2001.

J. L. Rico, M. R. Forero, and M. Molina, “Adaptación y validación de la escala hospitalaria de ansiedad y depresión (HAD) en una muestra de pacientes con cáncer del Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia,” Avances en Medición, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 73–86, 2005.

J. M. Ouintana, A. Padierna, C. Esteban, I. Arostegui, A. Bilbao, and I. Ruiz, “Evaluation of the psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale,” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 216–221, 2003.

A. S. Zigmond and R. P. Snaith, “The hospital anxiety and depression scale,” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 361–370, 1983.

A. Hinz, C. Finck, Y. Gómez, I. Daig, H. Glaesmer, and S. Singer, “Anxiety and depression in the general population in Colombia: reference values of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS),” Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 41–49, 2014.

K. L. Smarr and A. L. Keefer, “Measures of depression and depressive symptoms: Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9),” Arthritis Care & Research, vol. 63, supplement 11, pp. S454–S466, 2011.

D. A. Ojeda, C. S. Perea, C. L. Niño et al., “A novel association of two non-synonymous polymorphisms in PER2 and PER3 genes with specific diurnal preference subscales,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 553, pp. 52–56, 2013.

Y. González-Giraldo, J. Rojas, P. Novoa et al., “Functional polymorphisms in BDNF and COMT genes are associated with objective differences in arithmetical functioning in a sample of young adults,” Neuropsychobiology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 152–157, 2014.

M. Alaerts, S. Ceulemans, D. Forero et al., “Detailed analysis of the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) shows no association with bipolar disorder in the Northern Swedish population,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, vol. 150, no. 4, pp. 585–592, 2009.

L. C. Morales, G. Arboleda, Y. Rodríguez et al., “Absence of Lamin A/C gene mutations in four Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch syndrome patients,” American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, vol. 149, no. 12, pp. 2695–2699, 2009.

X. Solé, E. Guinó, J. Valls, R. Iniesta, and V. Moreno, “SNPStats: a web tool for the analysis of association studies,” Bioinformatics, vol. 22, no. 15, pp. 1928–1929, 2006.

I. Bjelland, A. A. Dahl, T. T. Haug, and D. Neckelmann, “The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review,” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 69–77, 2002.

J. Gui, J. H. Moore, S. M. Williams et al., “A simple and computationally efficient approach to multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis of gene-gene interactions for quantitative traits,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 6, Article ID e66545, 2013.

L. W. Hahn, M. D. Ritchie, and J. H. Moore, “Multifactor dimensionality reduction software for detecting gene-gene and gene-environment interactions,” Bioinformatics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 376–382, 2003.

Y. S. Nikolova, R. E. Ferrell, S. B. Manuck, and A. R. Hariri, “Multilocus genetic profile for dopamine signaling predicts ventral striatum reactivity,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1940–1947, 2011.

E. Kotyuk, G. Keszler, N. Nemeth, Z. Ronai, M. Sasvari-Szekely, and A. Szekely, “Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) as a novel candidate gene of anxiety,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 12, Article ID e80613, 2013.

P. M. Bækken, F. Skorpen, E. Stordal, J.-A. Zwart, and K. Hagen, “Depression and anxiety in relation to catechol-O-methyltransferase Val¹⁵⁸Met genotype in the general population: the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT),” BMC Psychiatry, vol. 8, article 48, 2008.

M. Berk, S. Johansson, N. R. Wray et al., “Glutamate cysteine ligase (GCL) and self reported depression: an association study from the HUNT,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 131, no. 1–3, pp. 207–213, 2011.

Z. Halmai, P. Dome, A. Vereczkei et al., “Associations between depression severity and purinergic receptor P2RX7 gene polymorphisms,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 104–109, 2013.

W. Yu, M. Clyne, M. J. Khoury, and M. Gwinn, “Phenopedia and Genopedia: disease-centered and gene-centered views of the evolving knowledge of human genetic associations,” Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 145–146, 2010.

K. R. Merikangas, R. Jin, J.-P. He et al., “Prevalence and correlates of bipolar spectrum disorder in the World Mental Health Survey Initiative,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 241–251, 2011.

D. A. Forero, A. Vélez-van-Meerbeke, S. N. Deshpande, H. Nicolini, and G. Perry, “Neuropsychiatric genetics in developing countries: current challenges,” World Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 69–71, 2014.

K. Mitropoulos, H. Al Jaibeji, D. A. Forero et al., “Success stories in genomic medicine from resource-limited countries,” Human Genomics, vol. 9, article 11, 2015.

T. Kato, “Whole genome/exome sequencing in mood and psychotic disorders,” Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 65–76, 2015.

H. G. Hernández, M. F. Mahecha, A. Mejía, H. Arboleda, and D. A. Forero, “Global long interspersed nuclear element 1 DNA methylation in a Colombian sample of patients with late-onset Alzheimer's disease,” American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and other Dementias, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 50–53, 2014.

R. S. Duman, “Synaptic plasticity and mood disorders,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 7, supplement 1, pp. S29–S34, 2002.

Y. González-Giraldo, A. Camargo, S. López-León, A. Adan, and D. Forero, “A functional SNP in MIR124-1, a brain expressed miRNA gene, is associated with aggressiveness in a Colombian sample,” European Psychiatry, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 499–503, 2015.