Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative MedicineVolume 2011 (2011), Article ID 408973, 6 pagesdoi:10.1155/2011/408973

Research Article

Pyrolytic Characteristics and Kinetics of Phragmites australis

Hui Zhao,1,2,3,4 Huaxiao Yan,¹ Congwang Zhang,1,4 Xiaodong Liu,¹ Yanhui Xue,¹ Yingyun Qiao,1,4 Yuanyu Tian,1,4 and Song Qin2,5

¹College of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266510, China²Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, China³Graduate University, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China⁴Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Low-Carbon Energy Chemical Engineering, Qingdao 266510, China⁵Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, Shandong 264003, China

Received 15 January 2011; Revised 25 May 2011; Accepted 24 July 2011

Copyright © 2011 Hui Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The pyrolytic kinetics of Phragmites australis was investigated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) method with linear temperature programming process under an inert atmosphere. Kinetic expressions for the degradation rate in devolatilization and combustion steps have been obtained for P. australis with Dollimore method. The values of apparent activation energy, the most probable mechanism functions, and the corresponding preexponential factor were determined. The results show that the model agrees well with the experimental data and provide useful information for the design of pyrolytic processing system using P. australis as feedstock to produce biofuel.

1. Introduction

The common reed, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. exSteud., described as one of the most widely distributed angiosperms [1, 2] is commonly found in freshwater and marine wetlands and along the upland edge of tidal marshes. P. australis has increased in proportion in both tidal and nontidal wetlands in North America and has become a major concern to wetland ecologists [3, 4]. Expansion of P. australis into salt marshes reportedly caused a fivefold decrease in plant species richness [5], reductions in microtopography [6, 7], and reductions in biodiversity [3]. P. australis is actively colonizing wetlands raising concern about loss of biodiversity [8, 9]. In addition, the alternative source of energy contributes to the reduction of CO₂ emissions since the same amount of CO₂ is extracted from the air during the growth period of the plants [10]. P. australis seems to be especially a promising energy plant and chemical feedstock due to its high production potential. Various processes have been proposed for the integrated utilization of these powerful plants [11, 12]. The common reed can provide a large quantity of biomass and annual yields of 40–63 tons per hectare have been reported. P. australis is becoming very important as stable biomass source for China with its natural huge reserves and increasing artificial cultivation.

Pyrolysis is an effective method to harvest the energy in P. australis. However, pyrolytic characteristics studies of P. australis are little, which has led to the production of biofuel being far from commercialization. Both the development of the pyrolytic process and reactor design require complete elucidation of the pyrolytic mechanism. Therefore, the pyrolytic mechanisms of P. australis should be studied.

The specific objective of the present work was to study the pyrolytic characteristics of P. australis using a TG/DSC instrument. The kinetic parameters of decomposition were then obtained and the pyrolytic mechanism was illustrated, which can provide useful information for the design of pyrolysis system using P. australis biomass as feedstock to produce bio-fuel.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

P. australis samples were harvested from a wetland beside the campus of Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China, September 2010.

2.2. Analysis of P. australis Samples

Samples were ground into fine powders and sieved to less than 0.147 mm. Proximate and ultimate analyses were carried out to characterize P. australis samples according to national standard GB212-91 (China) and element analyzer (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH vario EL cube), respectively. In addition, cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin contents were analyzed according to methods from the literature [13]. The results were summarized in Table 1. All tests were carried out in triplicate.

Table 1: Proximate analysis, ultimate analysis, and component analysis of P. australis (/%wt).

Parameter
P. australis

Proximate analysis a (wt.%, ad. Basis)

    Moisture
5.89 ± 0.03

    Ash
12.32 ± 1.12

    Volatile matter
70.01 ± 2.40

    Fix carbonc
11.78

Ultimate analysis b (wt.%, daf. Basis)

    Carbon
42.78 ± 1.53

    Hydrogen
5.17 ± 0.02

    Oxygenc
50.511

    Nitrogen
1.31 ± 0.02

    Sulfur
0.229 ± 0.01

    C/H
8.31 ± 0.31

    C/N
32.57 ± 1.55

Component analysis (wt.%, daf. Basis)

    Hemicellulose
30.68 ± 3.15

    Lignin
20.34 ± 1.56

    Cellulose
43.05 ± 3.98

aDry-free basis; bDry ash-free basis;  cCalculated by difference.

2.3. Pyrolysis of the Samples

Thermogravimetric analyses were carried out using a thermal analyzer (TGA/DSC1/1600LF, METTLER TOLEDO Co., Switzerland). 10 mg of initial sample was pyrolyzed under a nitrogen flow rate of 50 cm³/min with a heating rate of 25°C/min. The weight loss and calorific changes in response to temperature were then recorded and used to plot the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), derivative thermogravimetric analysis (DTG), and differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) curves. All experiments were replicated three times.

2.4. The Kinetic Parameters of the Samples

where α is the conversion rate and is defined as is the velocity constant, and f(α) is the mechanism function with different relative coefficient where β is the heating rate and T₀ is the initial temperature.

The reaction rate constant, , can be described by the following expression: By separation of variables and integration, The expression of corresponding to each one of the mechanisms considered is also shown in Table 2

Table 2: Algebraic expressions of functions and and mechanisms [23, 24].

No.

Rate-determining mechanism

1

Chemical reaction

2

Chemical reaction

3

Chemical reaction

4

Chemical reaction

5

Chemical reaction

6

Chemical reaction

7

Chemical reaction

8

Chemical reaction

9

Chemical reaction

10

Nucleation

11

Nucleation

12

Nucleation

13

Nucleation

14

Nucleation

15

Assumed random nucleation and its subsequent growth

16

Assumed random nucleation and its subsequent growth

17

Assumed random nucleation and its subsequent growth

18

Assumed random nucleation and its subsequent growth

19

Assumed random nucleation and its subsequent growth

20

Assumed random nucleation and its subsequent growth

21

Assumed random nucleation and its subsequent growth

22

Assumed random nucleation and its subsequent growth

23

Branching nuclei

24

Contracting disk

25

Contracting cylinder (cylindrical symmetry)

26

Contracting sphere (spherical symmetry)

27

One-dimensional diffusion

28

Two-dimensional diffusion

29

Two-dimensional diffusion

30

Three-dimensional diffusion, spherical symmetry

31

Three-dimensional diffusion, cylindrical symmetry

32

Three-dimensional diffusion

33

Three-dimensional diffusion

34

Three-dimensional diffusion

35

Three-dimensional diffusion

36

Three-dimensional diffusion

This equation is used to estimate the most correct reaction mechanism function . According to the plotting versus lgTi and a linear regression, if the mechanism studied conforms to certain function, the slope of the straight line should be equal to −1.00000 and the linear correlation coefficient R² is high Both of (5) and (6) are called Harcourt-Fission model of integral. and were constructed with deducing coefficients of least-square method With a given value of lgTi, the constants C, m, can be determined Substituting the value of back into (9) in conjunction with 1/T allows lnA and E to be calculated [14].

All plots were generated and the lines were fitted using the Origin 8.0 software.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Materials

The results of proximate, ultimate, and component analysis of P. australis samples are summarized in Table 1, which is in the same order of magnitude as energy crops. The comparison with other terrestrial materials shows a higher amount of ash and cellulose. The volatile matter and lignin contents of P. australis are lower, respectively, while the sulfur content of the samples is approximately equal [15].

3.2. Characteristics of the Thermal Degradation Process

Three stages in the pyrolytic process of P. australis are in accordance with the conclusion of oxidative pyrolysis curves of energy crops followed the usual shape for lignocellulosic materials [16–19]. The first stage (I) occurred as the temperature increased from 50 to 240°C, losing cellular water and the external water bound by surface tension. While the second stage (II), occurring as the temperature increased from 240 to 500°C was the devolatilization stage, during which the main pyrolytic process occurred and most of the organic materials are decomposed accompanied by various volatile components released gradually, resulting in a large weight loss which is more than 50% of total volatiles and formation of the main pyrolytic production. Specifically, stage II was composed of two zones for P. australis due to the different thermal stability of the components with zone I occurring as the temperature increased from 240 to 318°C which is a strong peak in the rate of weight loss curve, at which the rate of weight loss attains maximum with a maximum weight loss point at 288°C and zone II occurred as the temperature increased from 318 to 500°C with a maximum weight loss point at 346°C. The third stage (III) occurred as the temperature increased from 500 to 800°C with the residuals, the carbonaceous matters in the solid, slowly decomposed, resulting in the formation of a loose porous residual. A slight continued loss of weight is shown in the weight loss curve. P. australis is composed of many polysaccharides that have low polymerization. Moreover, the inorganic salts in P. australis presented a catalytic effect [20]. These findings indicate that the beginning of the decomposition occurs at a higher temperature for the samples evaluated in this study than for other terrestrial biomass with a high content of cellulose (straws and grasses) or lignin (woody biomass).

The weight losses of P. australis during stage I are primarily due to the loss of moisture and are similar to the moisture content values reported in Table 1. The instantaneous maximum reaction rate occurred in zone I of stage II. There was an endothermic peak during stage I that corresponded with the moisture evaporation procedure. As the temperature increased, an exothermic effect appeared during stage II and exothermic peaks were observed at 5–15°C after the maximum weight loss point. These findings indicate that the devolatilization stage (stage II) produced heat. Specifically, there was an endothermic effect during stage III. These findings indicate that the carbonaceous residual may have been decomposed at temperatures above 600°C. A maximum exothermic peak corresponding to the maximum weight loss rate peak appeared on the DSC curve of the samples (stage II). These findings indicate that the main pyrolysis process of the samples is an exothermic process. The exothermic effect was due to the charring process, which is the decomposition of the inorganic materials to metal carbonate (Figures 1, 2, and 3) [21, 22].

Figure 1: TG-DTG curves of P. australis.

Figure 2: DSC curves of P. australis.

Figure 3: Plot for determination of most probable mechanism functions.

3.3. Kinetic Analysis of the Pyrolysis Process

The most probable mechanism function with integral form can be expressed by, and the results calculated according to the above equations are as follows: , , and .

The result indicates that the model is in good agreement with the experimental data (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Plot for determination of E and (= 25.14 min⁻¹, E = 162.66 kJ mol⁻¹, R²  = 0.9999).

Comparisons of the decomposition temperature and activation energy of several types of biomass are provided in Table 3 [17]. The results indicate that the decomposition temperature of P. australis is lower than that of several kinds of plants and single component of biomass.

Table 3: Comparison of various kinetic parameters of pyrolysis for different biomass[17, 25].

Samples
Decomposition temperature (°C)
Activation energy (kJ mol⁻¹)

Cellulose
300–430
200

Hemicellulose
250–350
100

Lignin
250–550
80

Chitosan
268–312
95.6–185.7

Enteromorpha prolifera
174–551
228.1

spirulina platensis
190–560
76.2–97

Chlorella protothecoides
150–540
42.2–52.5

Dunaliella tertiolecta
155–299
145.713–146.421

Oak tree
230–400
236.2

Corn stover
250–470
57.95–58.94

Peat
208–334
52.77

P. australis
240–500
163

4. Conclusions

High priority should be given to the development and protection of biomass pyrolysis which is widely recognized as a technically and economically feasible way. This study presents useful information for the design of a pyrolytic processing system using P. australis biomass.(i)There were three stages in the pyrolytic process of the samples. The second stage is the main pyrolysis process and most of the organic materials are decomposed in this stage which is our study focused on. (ii)Iterative isoconversional procedure has been applied to estimate the values of apparent activation energy. The method of Dollimore combined with 36 mechanism functions is used to define the most probable mechanism ; the preexponential factor A = 8.28 × 10¹⁰ min⁻¹ and E = 1.63 × 10⁵ J mol⁻¹ are obtained on the basis of . (iii)Comparisons of various kinetic parameters of pyrolysis for different biomass types show that P. australis biomass has a great potential and a good prospect for producing biofuel by fast pyrolysis process.

To learn more about P. australis pyrolysis, characterization of liquid and solid products should be more in-depth understood [26, 27].

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21076117), CAS International partnership program “Typical environment processes and their effects on resources”, Outstanding young scholar fellowship of Shandong province (Molecular phycology) (JQ200914), projects of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program (J09LC22 and J10LC15), the Open Funding from the Key Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology, Institute of Oceanology (Kf201016), and Open Project Program of the Key Laboratory of Marine Bio-resources Sustainable Utilization (LMB101004), SCSIO, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Both Hui Zhao and Huaxiao Yan are equally contributed.

References

L. G. Holm, D. L. Plucknett, J. V. Pancho, and J. P. Herberger, The World's Worst Weeds, University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 1977.

O. A. Clevering and J. Lissner, “Taxonomy, chromosome numbers, clonal diversity and population dynamics of Phragmites australis,” Aquatic Botany, vol. 64, no. 3-4, pp. 185–208, 1999.

R. M. Chambers, L. A. Meyerson, and K. Saltonstall, “Expansion of Phragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America,” Aquatic Botany, vol. 64, no. 3-4, pp. 261–273, 1999.

L. Windham and L. A. Meyerson, “Effects of common reed (Phragmites australis) expansions on nitrogen dynamics of tidal marshes of the northeastern U.S,” Estuaries, vol. 26, no. 2B, pp. 452–464, 2003.

M. D. Bertness, P. J. Ewanchuk, and B. R. Silliman, “Anthropogenic modification of New England salt marsh landscapes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 1395–1398, 2002.

L. Windham and R. G. Lathrop, “Effects of Phragmites australis (common reed) invasion on aboveground biomass and soil properties in brackish tidal marsh of the mullica river, New Jersey,” Estuaries, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 927–935, 2002.

D. L. Raichel, K. W. Able, and J. M. Hartman, “The influence of Phragmites (common reed) on the distribution, abundance, and potential prey of a resident marsh fish in the Hackensack Meadowlands, New Jersey,” Estuaries, vol. 26, no. 2B, pp. 511–521, 2003.

S. Güsewell and F. Klötzli, “Assessment of aquatic and terrestrial reed (Phragmites australis) stands,” Wetlands Ecology and Management, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 367–373, 2000.

H. Cizkova, L. Pechar, S. Husák et al., “Chemical characteristics of soils and pore waters of three wetland sites dominated by Phragmites australis: relation to vegetation composition and reed performance,” Aquatic Botany, vol. 69, no. 2–4, pp. 235–249, 2001.

J. M. Adams and G. Piovesan, “Uncertainties in the role of land vegetation in the carbon cycle,” Chemosphere, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 805–819, 2002.

C. Pevida, M. G. Plaza, B. Arias, J. Fermoso, F. Rubiera, and J. J. Pis, “Surface modification of activated carbons for CO₂ capture,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 254, no. 22, pp. 7165–7172, 2008.

A. L. Chaffee, G. P. Knowles, Z. Liang, J. Zhang, P. Xiao, and P. A. Webley, “CO₂ capture by adsorption: materials and process development,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2007.

J. Parikh, S. A. Channiwala, and G. K. Ghosal, “A correlation for calculating elemental composition from proximate analysis of biomass materials,” Fuel, vol. 86, no. 12-13, pp. 1710–1719, 2007.

D. Dollimore, T. Ping, and K. S. Alexander, “The kinetic interpretation of the decomposition of calcium carbonate by use of relationships other than the Arrhenius equation,” Thermochimica Acta, vol. 282-283, pp. 13–27, 1996.

G. Taralas and M. G. Kontominas, “Energetic valorization of solid residues: pyrolysis of olive husks,” in Science in Thermal and Chemical Biomass Conversion, A. V. Bridgwater, Ed., Victoria, Vancouver Island, Canada, 2004.

S. P. Zou, Y. L. Wu, M. D. Yang, C. Li, and J. M. Tong, “Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of the marine microalgae Dunaliella tertiolecta using thermogravimetric analyzer,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 359–365, 2010.

D. Li, L. Chen, X. Yi, X. Zhang, and N. Ye, “Pyrolytic characteristics and kinetics of two brown algae and sodium alginate,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 101, no. 18, pp. 7131–7136, 2010.

J. Jauhiainen, J. A. Conesa, R. Font, and I. Martín-Gullón, “Kinetics of the pyrolysis and combustion of olive oil solid waste,” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2004.

A. E. Ghaly and A. Ergudenler, “Thermal degradation of cereal straws in air and nitrogen,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 28-29, no. 1, pp. 111–126, 1991.

J. M. Jones, L. I. Darvella, T. G. Bridgemana, M. Pourkashaniana, and A. Williamsa, “An investigation of the thermal and catalytic behavior of potassium in biomass combustion,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 1955–1963, 2007.

A. B. Ross, J. M. Jones, M. L. Kubacki, and T. Bridgeman, “Classification of macroalgae as fuel and its thermochemical behaviour,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 99, no. 14, pp. 6494–6504, 2008.

M. Jeguirim, S. Dorge, and G. Trouvé, “Thermogravimetric analysis and emission characteristics of two energy crops in air atmosphere: arundo donax and Miscanthus giganthus,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 788–793, 2010.

R. Z. Hu and Q. Z. Shi, Thermal Analysis Kinetics, Science Press, Beijing, China, 1st edition, 2001.

R. Ebrahimi-Kahrizsangi and M. H. Abbasi, “Evaluation of reliability of Coats-Redfern method for kinetic analysis of non-isothermal TGA,” Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 217–221, 2008.

H. Sutcu, “Pyrolysis by thermogravimetric analysis of blends of peat with coals of different characteristics and biomass,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol. 38, no. 3-4, pp. 245–249, 2007.

H. Sutcu, “Pyrolysis of Phragmites australis and characterization of liquid and solid products,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 573–577, 2008.

H. Sutcu and H. Demiral, “Production of granular activated carbons from loquat stones by chemical activation,” Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2009.