Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 170290, 7 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/170290

Research Article

Composition and Antidiarrheal Activity of Bidens odorata Cav.

Daniel Zavala-Mendoza,¹ Francisco J. Alarcon-Aguilar,² Salud Pérez-Gutierrez,³ M. Carmen Escobar-Villanueva,² and Miguel A. Zavala-Sánchez³

¹Experimental Biology P.h.D Program, D.C.B.S. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, 09340 México, DF, Mexico

²Departamento Ciencias de la Salud, D.C.B.S. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Avenida San Rafael Atlixco No. 186, Colonia Vicentina, Iztapalapa, 09340 México, DF, Mexico

³Departamento de Sistemas Biológicos, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco, Calzada del Hueso 1100, Colonia Villa Quietud, Coyoacán, 09340 México, DF, Mexico

Received 19 June 2013; Revised 30 August 2013; Accepted 7 September 2013

Academic Editor: Mohd Roslan Sulaiman

Copyright © 2013 Daniel Zavala-Mendoza et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The antidiarrheal effects of chloroform, methanol, and aqueous extracts of Bidens odorata Cav. were investigated at doses of 200 mg/kg on castor-oil-induced diarrhea. The chloroform extract of B. odorata (CBO) reduced diarrhea by 72.72%. The effect of CBO was evaluated on mice with diarrhea induced by castor oil, MgSO₄, arachidonic acid, or prostaglandin E₂. CBO inhibited the contraction induced by carbachol chloride on ileum (100 µg/mL) and intestinal transit (200 mg/kg) in Wistar rats. The active fraction of CBO (F4) at doses of 100 mg/kg inhibited the diarrhea induced by castor oil (90.1%) or arachidonic acid (72.9%) but did not inhibit the diarrhea induced by PGE₂. The active fraction of F4 (FR5) only was tested on diarrhea induced with castor oil and inhibited this diarrhea by 92.1%. The compositions of F4 and FR5 were determined by GC-MS, and oleic, palmitic, linoleic, and stearic acids were found. F4 and a mixture of the four fatty acids inhibited diarrhea at doses of 100 mg/kg (90.1% and 70.6%, resp.). The results of this study show that B. odorata has antidiarrheal effects, as is claimed by folk medicine, and could possibly be used for the production of a phytomedicine.

1. Introduction

Diarrheal diseases are among the most common gastrointestinal disorders and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children under 5 years of age, particularly in underdeveloped countries. The reported global mortality due to diarrhea in children under 5 years is approximately 1.87 million, representing 19% of all childhood deaths [1].

Medicinal plants are commonly used in Mexico to treat diarrhea and other diseases; these plants are therefore considered potential sources of antidiarrheal drugs. Among them, Bidens odorata Cav., commonly known as “Mozoquelite” or “Aceitilla,” is used to treat gastrointestinal discomforts such as diarrhea [2, 3], as well as headaches and pain of the lumbar region [2, 4]. It has also been found that aqueous extracts of this plant have a diuretic effect [5]. However, there have been no reports regarding the antidiarrheal activity of this plant. For this reason, we decided to study the antidiarrheal activity of B. odorata and determine the composition of the active extract.

2. Experimental

2.1. Plant Material

Bidens odorata was collected at Fortín de las Flores, Veracruz State, in September of 2010. The material was authenticated by taxonomist José García-Pérez, and a voucher specimen (SLPM 21668) was deposited in the Herbarium Isidro Palacios of the Instituto de Investigaciones de Zonas Deserticas of the Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosi. The aerial parts of the plant (leaves and branches) were dried in the shade and powdered.

2.2. Extracts Preparation

In a two-litre flask fitted with a reflux condenser, 125 g of dried, powdered B. odorata was extracted at boiling temperature for 4 h with 1500 mL of solvent (chloroform, methanol, or water), after which the mixture was cooled to room temperature and filtered. The chloroform and methanol extracts were dried under vacuum in a rotatory evaporator followed by a vacuum oven at room temperature for 12 h. The aqueous extract was lyophilised. The yields of the chloroform, methanol, and aqueous extracts were 5.88, 10.40, and 9.04%, respectively.

2.3. Separation of CBO and Component Identification of Active Fractions

The CBO was separated by column chromatography using a column packed with silica gel (Kieselgel 60, 70–230 mesh ASTM) and prepared in hexane as the mobile phase. The polarity was increased with ethyl acetate, and 100 mL fractions were collected and compared by thin layer chromatography; subsequently, those with the same pattern were pooled, resulting in 6 fractions. The active fraction (F4) was a waxy semisolid with a melting point (mp) of 36°C that was obtained with a hexane/ethyl acetate ratio of 8 : 2. F4 was separated by column chromatography using a column packed with silica gel (Kieselgel 60, 70–230 mesh ASTM) and prepared in chloroform as the mobile phase. The polarity was increased with ethyl acetate, and 100 mL fractions were collected and compared by thin layer chromatography; subsequently, those with the same pattern were pooled, resulting in 7 fractions. The active fraction (FR5) had an mp of 34°C and was obtained with chloroform/ethyl acetate (9 : 1 v/v).

2.4. Identification of the Active Compounds of F4 and FR5

The analysis of F4 and FR5 was performed on a gas chromatograph coupled to a mass spectrometer (Agilent Technology models 6890N and 5973) using a capillary column (DB-5HT) 15 m in length with a 0.25 mm internal diameter and 0.10 µm film thickness. We used a temperature program starting at 100°C for 3 min, followed by a heating rate of 10°C per min to 320°C, at which point the temperature was maintained for 5 min. Splitless injection was used with a ratio of 1 : 100, and the injector temperature was 320°C. The spectra were determined at 70 eV, and the mass range was analysed from 33 to 800 m/z. The compounds were identified from mass spectra and compared to spectra reported in the NIST database (Wiley09/NIST11).

2.5. Animals

Male CD1 mice (20–25 g) and male Wistar rats (180–250 g) from the Unidad de Produccion y Experimentacion de Animales de Laboratorio (UPEAL) of the Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana animal facility were housed in isolated cages under standardised conditions (dark/light 12/12 h) at 30°C and 50–55% humidity. The animals were supplied with rodent food (Pet Foods 5001) and water ad libitum. Prior to the study, the animals were submitted to a fasting period of 18–24 h with free access to water.

All experiments were performed according to the current guidelines for the care of laboratory animals and the ethical guidelines for investigation in conscious animals [6].

2.6. Evaluation of the Effects of the Extract on Normal Defecation

Groups of five mice were individually placed in acrylic cages containing filter paper at the bottom [7]. CBO at a dose of 200 mg/kg or loperamide at 2.5 mg/kg was administered to the test groups, and a separate control group received only the vehicle. The total amount of faeces in each group was assessed every hour for the next 4 h. The percent reduction in the amount of faeces in the treated groups was calculated in comparison to the control animals (0% reduction).

2.7. Evaluation of Antidiarrheal Activity on Castor-Oil-Induced Diarrhea

Groups of 15 mice were administered the methanol or aqueous extract (200 mg/kg); loperamide (2.5 mg/kg); CBO (300, 200, 100, and 50 mg/kg); F4, a mixture of palmitic, linoleic, oleic, and stearic acid or each individual acid (100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.12, and 1.55 mg/kg); or vehicle (0.1 mL) 30 min before the administration of castor oil (4 mL/kg). All administrations were p.o.

Following treatment, five animals of each group were placed separately in acrylic cages lined with filter paper that was changed every hour. The severity of the diarrhea was assessed each hour for 4 h. The total number of watery faeces excreted was scored and compared with the score from the control group. The total score of the diarrheic faeces of the control group was considered to be 100%, in accordance with the model described by Melo et al. [8], Litchfield and Wilcoxon [9], and Douglas et al. [10]. The results are expressed as a percentage of inhibition.

2.8. Evaluation of Antidiarrheal Activity on MgSO₄-Induced Diarrhea

Groups of 15 mice, separated into boxes of five animals each, were administered the CBO (200, 100, and 50 mg/kg), loperamide (2.5 mg/kg), or vehicle (0.1 mL) 30 min before the administration of MgSO₄ (4 mL/kg). The results are expressed as a percentage of inhibition.

2.9. Evaluation of Antidiarrheal Activity on AA- and PGE₂-Induced Diarrhea

The antidiarrheal activity of CBO (100 and 200 mg/kg) and F4 (100 mg/kg) was evaluated on diarrhea induced with AA (3 mg/kg) and PGE₂ (1 mg/kg). Three groups of 15 mice, separated into cages of five animals each, were administered the following treatments p.o.: group 1, CBO (200 mg/kg) or F4 (100 mg/kg); group 2, loperamide (2.5 mg/kg); and group 3, vehicle (0.1 mL). The treatments were administered 30 min after the three groups received i.p. AA or PGE₂.

Following treatment, the groups were separated into subgroups of five animals, which were placed separately in acrylic cages lined with filter paper that was changed every half an hour. The severity of the diarrhea was assessed every 30 min for 2 h. The total number of watery faeces excreted was scored and compared with the score from the control group. The total score of the diarrheic faeces of the control group was considered to be 100%, in accordance with the model described by Melo et al. [8].

2.10. Small Intestinal Transit

The inhibitory activity of CBO on intestinal transit was tested using the following procedure [11]. Each group was administered vehicle, CBO (200 mg/kg), or loperamide (2.5 mg/kg) in a volume of 1.5 mL/animal, followed 30 min later by treatment with castor oil (4 mL/kg). A 2% suspension of graphite in 1.5% agar was orally administered to groups of 15 rats (1.5 mL/animal). At 30, 60, and 90 min after the administration of the graphite-agar suspension plus the castor oil, the rats were killed in groups of five, and the gastrointestinal tract was removed and opened. The distance travelled by the marker was measured and expressed as a percentage of the total length of the intestine from the pylorus to caecum. The results are expressed as percentages of intestinal transit and were subsequently compared to the results of the control group.

2.11. Evaluation of Effects on Ileum Contraction

Wistar male rats (300 g) were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The abdomen was opened, and segments of ileum (10 cm proximal to the caecum) were flushed twice with aerated physiological salt solution (PSS) to remove the contents. The ileum was cut into segments approximately 1 cm long and placed in a 2 mL organ bath containing PSS with the following composition (mM): NaCl (118), NaHCO₃ (25), KCl (4.7), KH₂PO₄ (1.2), MgSO₄ (1.2), CaCl₂ (2.5), and D-glucose (11). The organ bath was maintained at 36°C with aeration through bubbling with a mixture of 95% O₂ and 5% CO₂ (pH 7.4). Contractions of the ileum tissues were isometrically recorded through a force displacement transducer (Grass FT03) connected to a TBRS2 Grass polygraph. The tissues were allowed to equilibrate for 60 min, during which the PSS was changed every 20 min. The tissues were maintained under an optimal tension of 1 g prior to initiation of the experimental protocol. To expose the tissues to a single submaximal concentration of KCl (23 mM) and to elicit contractile activity, the ileum rings were bathed in a depolarisation solution (23 mM KCl) prepared by the equimolecular substitution of NaCl for KCl. Control contractile responses were considered to be two successive similar responses after a group of tissues (, two tissues per rat) were incubated with CBO dissolved in 20 µL ethanol-dimethyl sulphoxide (1 : 1) or distilled water for 10 min. According to the model described by Estrada-Soto et al. [12], each tissue was stimulated with a different concentration of carbachol chloride (0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10, or 100 µM), and the amplitude was measured.

The contractile response for the group treated with solvent alone was considered to be a response of 100% and was compared with the contractile response in tissues pretreated with 100 µg/mL CBO, based on the method described by Estrada-Soto et al. [12].

2.12. Acute Toxicity

CBO was orally administered to groups of mice () at single doses of 2500, 3750, or 5000 mg/kg. This range of doses used in mice followed the method presented by Lorke, D. and OECD/OCDE 420 [13, 14]. After administration, the animals were observed under open-field conditions for a 72-hour period. The number of animal deaths and signs of clinical toxicity were recorded. The median lethal dose (LD₅₀) was calculated by the method described by Litchfield and Wilcoxon [9].

3. Statistics

The results are expressed as the means s.e.m.

The differences between the mean values of intestinal transit were evaluated by Student’s t-test, which is used in the analysis of equal variance of two groups with normal distribution [15]. The antidiarrheal activity and the effect on inhibition of ileum contractile activity were analysed using ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test. These tests were used to compare the mean values of the antidiarrheal activity with the control group. Statistical significance was set at .

4. Results and Discussion

The pharmacological activities of the chloroform, methanol, and aqueous extracts of B. odorata at doses of 200 mg/kg on mice with diarrhea induced by castor oil are shown in Table 1. The results indicated that the aqueous and methanol extracts of B. odorata inhibited the diarrhea induced by castor oil by less than 50%. A previous study [10] reported the antidiarrheal activity of chloroform, methanol, and aqueous extracts at doses of 100 mg/kg and the % of inhibition was 45.6, 26.1, and 22.4%, respectively; for this reason we decided to test a higher dose (200 mg/kg).

Table 1: Antidiarrheal effect of the aqueous, chloroform, and methanol extracts of B. odorata on mice with castor-oil-induced diarrheaa.

Treatment
Doses mg/kg
Percentage of inhibition ± s.e.

Vehicle
0.1 mL
—

Aqueous extract
200

Methanol extract
200

CBO
200

Loperamide
2.5

The results are the mean of 15 animals standard error.

Significant difference was found: .

However, CBO extract significantly diminished the induced diarrhea by 72.72% in this model. The results of CBO on castor-oil- or MgSO₄-induced diarrhea are shown in Table 2. At a dose of 100 mg/kg, the extract reduced the diarrhea induced by MgSO₄ by 84.85%; this antidiarrheal effect was decreased at a dose of 200 mg/kg. Additionally, it was observed that the greatest effect of this extract in animals with castor-oil-induced diarrhea occurred at doses of 200 and 300 mg/kg (72.7 and 77.1%, resp.), indicating that the activity of CBO was not dose dependent at the doses tested when castor oil or MgSO₄ was used as the cathartic agent. The castor-oil-induced diarrhea model is suitable for the study of both secretory diarrhea and intestinal motility. Castor oil or its active component, ricinoleic acid, increases peristaltic activity and causes changes in the permeability of the intestinal mucosal membrane to electrolytes and water [16]. Additionally, the diarrhea induced by castor oil has been found to release prostaglandins [17] and to act on tachykinin receptors (NK1 and NK2) [16] and nitric oxide [18–20].

Table 2: Antidiarrheal activity of CBO on mice with castor-oil-, MgSO₄-, arachidonic-acid-, and prostaglandin-E₂-induced diarrheaa.

Cathartic agent
Treatment
Doses mg/kg
Percentage of inhibition

Magnesium sulphate
Vehicle
1 mL

CBO

50

100

200

Loperamide
2.5

Castor oil
Vehicle
1 mL

CBO

50

100

200

300

Loperamide
2.5

Arachidonic acid
Vehicle
0.1 mL

CBO
100

200

Loperamide
2.5

Prostaglandins E₂
Vehicle
0.1 mL

CBO
100

200

Loperamide
2.5

The results are the mean of 15 animals standard error.

Significant difference was found: .

The osmotic properties of MgSO₄ prevent the reabsorption of water and ions, leading to increases in the volume of the intestinal content. This compound also promotes the production of cholecystokinin from the duodenal mucosa [21], further increasing the secretions and exerting a positive motor effect on the small intestine [8, 21]. The activity of CBO in mice with diarrhea induced with AA or PGE₂ is shown in Table 2. The effect of a 200 mg/kg dose of CBO on diarrhea induced by AA was 62.5%, an effect that diminished at 100 mg/kg (45.8%). CBO at these two doses had no effect on diarrhea induced by PGE₂. The results of this inhibition study suggest that CBO affects the release of prostaglandins [22].

CBO did not demonstrate any effect on the defecation of untreated mice.

The intestinal transit of untreated rats, castor-oil-treated rats, and CBO-treated (200 mg/kg) rats is shown in Figure 1. The percentage of intestinal transit observed in CBO-treated rats with respect to castor-oil-treated rats after 30, 60, and 90 min was 51.4%, 57%, and 68.4%. These results indicate that CBO inhibited intestinal motility.

Figure 1: Effect of CBO (200 mg/kg) on intestinal transit in rats. The results are expressed as the mean of 5 determinations standard error. * with respect to the castor-oil-treated group.

Carbachol chloride, at micromolar concentrations, causes a concentration-dependent contraction of the ileum isolated from rats. CBO (100 μg/mL) had a significant inhibitory effect on the ileum stimulated with carbachol chloride at concentrations of 0.1 to 100 μg/mL (Figure 2), possibly due to the interaction of this extract with the carbachol chloride muscarinic receptor (μ3) [23, 24]. The results of the present investigation demonstrate that CBO has antidiarrheal and antimotility activity in the experimental models studied.

Figure 2: Effect of CBO (100 μg/mL) on ileum contractions stimulated with carbachol chloride. The results are expressed as the mean of 5 determinations standard error. * and ** with respect to the carbachol-chloride-treated group.

CBO did not demonstrate toxic effects at the doses tested.

For this reason, CBO was separated by column chromatography. Eighteen fractions were obtained and compared by thin layer chromatography, which reduced the extract to 6 fractions. The antidiarrheal effect of these six fractions was tested on mice with castor-oil-induced diarrhea and the major effect was observed with F4 (90.1%), which was separated by chromatography, obtaining 14 fractions, which were compared by thin layer chromatography to obtain 7 fractions. The active fraction was FR5, which inhibited diarrhea induced by castor oil by 92.1%. These results are similar to those of F4, and the yield of FR5 was very low, so we proceeded with the study with F4.

The antidiarrheal effect of F4 on mice with diarrhea induced by AA or prostaglandin E₂ was also tested. We found that F4 at doses of 100 mg/kg did not have an effect on diarrhea induced by prostaglandin E₂; however, in diarrhea induced by AA, the inhibition was 72.9%. These results suggest that F4 inhibits the biotransformation of arachidonic acid to prostaglandin, as suggested by Manning et al. and Rodríguez-Lagunas et al., as AA is a substratum of prostaglandins [25, 26].

The composition of F4 and FR5 was obtained by CG-MS, and the results are shown in Table 3. We found that F4 has 76 components, the main compounds of which are palmitic acid (9.14%), linoleic acid (13.12%), trans-oleic acid (9.24%), stearic acid (3.39%), lignoceric acid (3.55%), octacosanoic acid (3.14%), and behenic acid (3.23%). FR5 has 7 compounds, four of which are palmitic acid, linoleic acid, trans-oleic acid and stearic acid; for this reason, we tested only these four fatty acids.

Table 3: CG/MS results for the composition of F4 and FR5**.

Compound number
Retention time
Compound
Percentage composition F4
Percentage composition FR5

2
5.424
Lauric acid

5
6.427
n-Eicosane

11
8.055
Myristic acid

15
9.041
Pentadecanoic acid

20
9.829
Palmitoleic acid

21
10.206
Palmitic acid

51.6540.977

24
11.046
Margaric acid

26
11.783
Linoleic acid

32.379

27
11.852
Oleic acid

28
12.04
Stearic acid

2.76

29
12.846
Nonadecanoic acid

30
13.386
(11E,13E)-11,13-Icosadienoic acid

31
13.446
(11E)-11-Icosenoic acid

32
13.72
Eicosanoic acid

33
14.5
Heneicosanoic acid

34
15.323
Behenic acid

36
16.042
Tricosanoic acid

37
16.531
n-Heptacosane

38
16.797
Lignoceric acid

40
17.388
Squalene

41
17.456
Pentacosanoic acid

43
18.159
Hexacosanoic acid

45
18.776
Heptacosanoic acid

46
19.205
Hentriacontane

47
19.47
Octacosanoic acid

54
20.687
Melissic acid

59
21.416
Friedelan-3-one

60
21.827
Dotriacontanoic acid

64
22.324
Tritriacontanoic acid

67
22.873
Tetratriacontanoic acid

76
27.466
Octacosyl palmitate

Only identified compounds are presented. In F4, forty-five compounds were not identified; in RF5 seven compounds were detected and only four were identified.

The results of the antidiarrheal activities of these four components individually, a mixture of all four components, and F4 are shown in Table 4. At a dose of 25 mg/kg, linoleic acid inhibited diarrhea by 53.2%; this effect is the same as what is found at doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg. Similar results were observed at doses of 6.25 to 100 mg/kg when palmitic acid was tested; the maximum effect was at a dose of 100 mg/kg (67.5% inhibition). Stearic acid showed activity only at a dose of 100 mg/kg (43.9%). Oleic acid at doses of 1.56 and 3.12 mg/kg had no effect. The effect of oleic acid was 54.5% at a dose of 6.25 mg/kg, which did not change when the dose was further increased. For the mixture of the four acids (at the relative proportions detected in F4) at a dose of 1.56 mg/kg, the inhibition was 29.3%, reaching 70% at a dose of 100 mg/kg, which is higher than that obtained with any other fatty acid tested. These results suggest that there could be a synergic effect of the components of F4.

Table 4: Effect of F4, palmitic, oleic, linoleic, and stearic acids, and their mixture at doses of 1.56 to 100 mg/kg on castor-oil-induced diarrhea.

Doses mg/kg
Diarrhea inhibition (%)

F4
Linoleic acid
Palmitic acid
Stearic acid
Oleic acid
Acids mixture

1.56

3.12

6.25

12.5

25

50

100

The results are expressed as the mean of 15 animals standard error. and with respect to the C-group.

Linoleic acid has been previously reported to have activity on coronary diseases, hypertension, cancer, and rheumatoid arthritis [27]. Palmitic acid helps to maintain low blood levels of serum cholesterol and low-density lipoproteins and can help avoid some immunological responses [28]. There are no scientific reports regarding the antidiarrheal activity of these two acids, and we also did not find any reports about the pharmacological activities of stearic or oleic acid with respect to B. odorata.

5. Conclusions

The present study validates the use of B. odorata in folk medicine as a remedy for intestinal cramps and diarrhea and suggests that this plant could possibly be used for the production of a phytomedicine.

Further pharmacological studies will be necessary to propose the exact mechanism of action.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Drs. Norma C. Cardenas Ortega and Marco Martín Gonzalez Chavez for their comments and support.

References

C. Boschi-Pinto, L. Velebit, and K. Shibuya, “Estimating child mortality due to diarrhoea in developing countries,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 86, no. 9, pp. 710–717, 2008.

Biblioteca digital de la medicina tradicional Mexicana, 2012, http://www.medicinatradicionalmexicana.unam.mx/index.php

A. Argueta, L. Cano, and M. Rodarte, Atlas de las plantas de la medicina tradicional mexicana I, Instituto Nacional Indigenista, México City, Mexico, 1994.

M. Martínez, Las plantas medicinales de México, Ediciones Botas, 6th edition, 1968.

M. E. Meléndez Camargo, B. Berdeja, and G. Miranda, “Diuretic effect of the aqueous extract of Bidens odorata in the rat,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 95, no. 2-3, pp. 363–366, 2004.

Guía para el cuidado y uso de animales de laboratorio, Academia Nacional de Medicina, Academy Press, Edición mexicana edition, 1999.

J. Galvez, A. Zarzuelo, M. E. Crespo, M. D. Lorente, M. A. Ocete, and J. Jimenez, “Antidiarrhoeic activity of Euphorbia hirta extract and isolation of an active flavonoid constituent,” Planta Medica, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 333–336, 1993.

M. D. F. F. Melo, G. Thomas, and R. Mukherjee, “Antidiarrhoeal activity of bisnordihydrotoxiferine isolated from the root bark of Strychnos trinervis (Vell.) Mart. (Loganiaceae),” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 79–82, 1988.

J. Litchfield and F. Wilcoxon, “A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 96, pp. 99–113, 1949.

C. Douglas, Desing and Analysis of Experimental, John Wiley & Sons; New York, NY, USA, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Ariz, USA, 5th edition, 2001.

P. Vischer and J. Casals Stenzel, “Influence of prostacyclin and indomethacin on castor oil-induced gastrointestinal effects in rats,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 152–156, 1983.

S. Estrada-Soto, D. González-Maldonado, P. Castillo-España, F. Aguirre-Crespo, and J. C. Sánchez-Salgado, “Spasmolytic effect of Mentha pulegium L. involves ionic flux regulation in rat ileum strips,” Journal of Smooth Muscle Research, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 107–117, 2010.

D. Lorke, “A new approach to practical acute toxicity testing,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 275–287, 1983.

OECD/OCDE 420, “Guideline for testing of chemicals, Acute oral toxicity-fixed dose procedure,” 2001

D. Zavala, Estudio Fitoquímico y Farmacológico de Bidens odorata Cav, Heliotropium curassavicum L y Chrysactinia mexicana Gray [Tesis de Maestría], Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Xochimilco, Coyoacan Ciudad de México, México City, Mexico, 2006.

T. Croci, M. Landi, X. Emonds-Alt, G. Le Fur, J.-P. Maffrand, and L. Manara, “Role of tachykinins in castor oil diarrhoea in rats,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 375–380, 1997.

F. Awouters, C. J. E. Niemegeers, F. M. Lenaerts, and P. A. Janssen, “Delay of castor oil diarrhoea in rats: a new way to evaluate inhibitors of prostaglandin biosynthesis,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 41–45, 1978.

N. Mascolo, A. A. Izzo, G. Autore, F. Barbato, and F. Capasso, “Nitric oxide and castor oil-induced diarrhea,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 268, no. 1, pp. 291–295, 1994.

A. A. Izzo, T. S. Gaginella, N. Mascolo, and F. Capasso, “Recent findings on the mode of action of laxatives: the role of platelet activating factor and nitric oxide,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 403–406, 1998.

M. Uchida, Y. Kato, K. Matsueda, R. Shoda, A. Muraoka, and S. Yamato, “Involvement of nitric oxide from nerves on diarrhea induced by castor oil in rats,” Japanese Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 168–170, 2000.

M. Shahriar, M. S. Bhuiya, M. T. H. Khan, M. A. Gafur, and M. S. K. Choudhri, “Pharmacological study of Symplocos racemosa Roxb,” Hamdard Medicus XLIII, vol. 2, pp. 8–18, 2000.

R. Martín-Venegas, S. Roig-Pérez, R. Ferrer, and J. J. Moreno, “Arachidonic acid cascade and epithelial barrier function during Caco-2 cell differentiation,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1416–1423, 2006.

W. Hu, S. Mahavadi, F. Li, and K. S. Murthy, “Upregulation of RGS4 and downregulation of CPI-17 mediate inhibition of colonic muscle contraction by interleukin-1β,” American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology, vol. 293, no. 6, pp. C1991–C2000, 2007.

X. Bian and J. J. Galligan, “α2-Adrenoceptors couple to inhibition of R-type calcium currents in myenteric neurons,” Neurogastroenterology and Motility, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 845–855, 2007.

B. P. Manning, K. A. Sharkey, and G. M. Mawe, “Effects of PGE2 in guinea pig colonic myenteric ganglia,” American Journal of Physiology—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 283, no. 6, pp. G1388–G1397, 2002.

M. J. Rodríguez-Lagunas, R. Martín-Venegas, J. J. Moreno, and R. Ferrer, “PGE₂ promotes Ca²⁺-mediated epithelial barrier disruption through EP₁ and EP₄ receptors in Caco-2 cell monolayers,” American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology, vol. 299, no. 2, pp. C324–C334, 2010.

L. Li, H. Li, Q. Li et al., “An 11-bp insertion in Zea mays fatb reduces the palmitic acid content of fatty acids in maize grain,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 9, Article ID e24699, 2011.

P. Liu, S.-R. Shen, H. Ruan, Q. Zhou, L.-L. Ma, and G.-Q. He, “Production of conjugated linoleic acids by Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from naturally fermented Chinese pickles,” Journal of Zhejiang University B, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 923–930, 2011.