Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 450572, 16 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/450572

Research Article

Synergistic Effect between Cryptotanshinone and Antibiotics against Clinic Methicillin and Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Jeong-Dan Cha,¹ Jeong-Ho Lee,² Kyung Min Choi,¹ Sung-Mi Choi,³ and Jeong Hye Park⁴

¹Department of Research Development, Institute of Jinan Red Ginseng, Jinan, Republic of Korea

²Department of Oriental Medicine Resources, College of Environmental and Bioresource Sciences, Chonbuk National University, Republic of Korea

³Department of Dental Hygiene, Daegu Health College, Daegu, Republic of Korea

⁴Department of Nursing, Dong-eui University, Republic of Korea

Received 25 November 2013; Revised 6 February 2014; Accepted 18 February 2014; Published 24 March 2014

Academic Editor: Tai-Long Pan

Copyright © 2014 Jeong-Dan Cha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Cryptotanshinone (CT), a major tanshinone of medicinal plant Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge, demonstrated strong antibacterial activity against clinic isolated methicillin and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA and VRSA) in this experiment. The CT was determined against clinic isolated MRSA 1–16 with MIC and MBC values ranging from 4 to 32 and 8 to 128 μg/mL; for MSSA 1-2 from 16 to 32 μg/mL and 64 to 128 μg/mL; for VRSA 1-2 from 2 to 4 μg/mL and 4 to 16 μg/mL, respectively. The range of MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ of CT was 0.5–8 μg/mL and 4–64 μg/mL, respectively. The combination effects of CT with antibiotics were synergistic (FIC index ) against most of tested clinic isolated MRSA, MSSA, and VRSA except additive, MRSA 4 and 16 in oxacillin, MRSA 6, 12, and 15 in ampicillin, and MRSA 6, 11, and 15 in vancomycin (FIC index < 0.75–1.0). Furthermore, a time-kill study showed that the growth of the tested bacteria was completely attenuated after 2–6 h of treatment with the 1/2 MIC of CT, regardless of whether it was administered alone or with ampicillin, oxacillin, or vancomycin. The results suggest that CT could be employed as a natural antibacterial agent against multidrug-resistant pathogens infection.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the most important pathogens in both hospitals and the community and can cause numerous syndromes in humans, such as furuncle, carbuncle, abscess, pneumonia, meningitis, bacterial arthritis, myocarditis, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and septicemia [1–3]. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a significant problem in hospitals and communities worldwide, and awareness of MRSA in animals and reports of its zoonotic spread have increased in recent years [3, 4]. The increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has led to widespread, increased use of vancomycin [5, 6]. Subsequently, numerous reports of elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) to vancomycin among MRSA isolates have surfaced, concomitant with increased global vancomycin exposure to MRSA [7, 8]. Greater than 60% of S. aureus isolates are now resistant to methicillin (oxacillin), and some strains have developed resistance to more than 20 different antimicrobial agents; new agents are therefore needed for the treatment of S. aureus [9, 10]. Plant medicines are used on a worldwide scale to prevent and treat infectious diseases. They are of great demand both in the developed and developing countries for the primary health care needs due to their wide biological and medicinal activities, higher safety margin and lesser costs [11, 12]. Plants are rich in a wide variety of secondary metabolites such as tannins, alkaloids, terpenoids, and flavonoids having been found in vitro since they have antimicrobial properties and may serve as an alternative, effective, cheap, and safe antimicrobial for the treatment of microbial infections [12–15]. At the same time, because of the difficulty in developing chemical synthetic drugs and because of their side effects, scientists are making more efforts to search for new drugs from plant resources to combat clinical multidrug-resistant microbial infections [11, 12, 16].

The main components of S. miltiorrhiza can be divided into two groups: hydrophilic compounds such as salvianolic acids and lipophilic chemicals, including diterpenoid and tanshinones [17]. The second group of components, labeled as tanshinone I, tanshinone II, and cryptotanshinone, are the major bioactive constituents and have various kinds of pharmacological effects including antibacterial, antioxidant, and antitumor activities and prevention of angina pectoris and myocardial infarction [18–20]. The cryptotanshinone (CT) exhibits antimicrobial activity against a broad range of Gram-positive bacteria, including S. aureus, and Gram-negative bacteria as well as other microorganisms [18, 21]. The hexane and chloroform fractions of S. miltiorrhiza evidenced profound antimicrobial activity and inhibited resistant gene expression against Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) [21, 22].

In this study, the antimicrobial activities of cryptotanshinone (CT) against methicillin and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in a clinic were assessed using broth microdilution method and the checkerboard and time-kill methods for synergistic effect of the combination with antibiotics.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Extraction and Isolation

The air-dried roots (2.0 kg) of S. miltiorrhiza were crushed and extracted with MeOH (8 L × 3) at room temperature. The MeOH extracts (210 g) were evaporated and suspended in distilled water and partitioned sequentially with CH₂Cl₂, EtOAc, and n-BuOH. The CH₂Cl₂ soluble fraction was concentrated in vacuo, and its crude extract (28 g) was subjected to silica gel column chromatography using a CHCl₃-MeOH gradient solvent system to provide ten fractions (A1–A10). Fraction A4 was further subjected to silica gel column chromatography with a CHCl₃-MeOH (10 : 1) to yield five fractions (B1–B5). Fraction B3 was purified on recycling prep-HPLC (JAIGEL GS column and 220 nm) eluted with MeOH (4.0 mL/min) to yield cryptotanshinone (98 mg). The structure of cryptotanshinone was identified by comparing its spectral data with those published [23, 24].

2.2. Preparation of Bacterial Strains

16 isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 2 isolates of methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA), and 2 isolates of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) were purchased from the Culture Collection of Antimicrobial Resistant Microbes (CCARM); standard strains of methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) ATCC 25923 and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) ATCC 33591 were used as well (Table 1). Antibiotic susceptibility was determined in testing the inhibition zones (inoculums 0.5 McFarland suspension, 1.5 × 10⁸ CFU/mL) and MIC/MBC (inoculums 5 × 10⁵ CFU/mL) for strains, measured as described in the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS, 1999). Briefly, the growth of bacteria was examined at 37°C in 0.95 mL of BHI broth containing various concentrations of CT. These tubes were inoculated with 5 × 10⁵ colony-forming units (CFU)/mL of an overnight culture grown in BHI broth and incubated at 37°C. After 24 h of incubation, the optical density (OD) was measured spectrophotometrically at 550 nm. Three replicates were measured for each concentration of tested drugs.

Table 1: Antibacterial activity of cryptotanshinone and antibiotics in isolated MRSA, VRSA, MSSA, and some of reference bacteria.

Samples
Cryptotanshinone (μg/mL)
Ampicillin
Oxacillin
Vancomycin

MIC/MBC
MIC/MBC (μg/mL)

MSSA ATCC 25923¹
4
64
64/256
8/16
0.25/1
0.5/2

MRSA ATCC 33591²
0.5
4
4/16
512/2048
8/16
1/4

VRSA 3A063³
0.5
2
2/4
512/2048
512/1024
16/32

VRSA 3A066⁴
1
4
4/16
128/256
512/1024
32/64

MSSA 1⁵
2
16
16/64
1024/2048
0.5/1
1/4

MSSA 2⁶
8
32
32/128
256/512
1/2
1/2

MRSA 1
2
16
16/32
128/256
128/256
1/2

MRSA 2
8
64
64/128
256/256
8/32
2/4

MRSA 3
1
4
4/16
128/512
128/512
2/4

MRSA 4
0.5
4
4/8
128/256
512/2048
1/2

MRSA 5
2
64
64/128
128/512
512/1024
1/2

MRSA 6
0.5
4
4/16
64/128
64/256
1/2

MRSA 7
2
8
8/16
128/256
512/1024
1/4

MRSA 8
4
32
32/64
256/256
512/2048
1/4

MRSA 9
2
8
8/16
64/128
512/1024
1/2

MRSA 10
2
16
16/64
128/256
512/1024
1/2

MRSA 11
4
8
8/32
64/128
64/128
1/2

MRSA 12
1
4
4/8
128/256
128/256
1/4

MRSA 13
4
32
32/128
128/256
32/128
1/2

MRSA 14
0.5
8
8/16
64/128
8/16
1/4

MRSA 15
0.5
4
4/16
64/128
128/256
1/4

MRSA 16
2
8
8/16
128/512
128/512
1/2

 ¹MSSA (ATCC 25923): reference strain methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus.

2MRSA (ATCC 33591): reference strain methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

3VRSA 3A063: vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically.

4VRSA 3A066: vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically.

5MSSA (1-2): methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically.

6MRSA (1–16): methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically.

2.3. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration/Minimum Bactericidal Concentration Assay

The antimicrobial activities of CT against clinical isolates MRSA 16, MSSA 2, VRSA 2, and reference strains were determined via the broth dilution method [25]. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was recorded as the lowest concentration of test samples resulting in the complete inhibition of visible growth. For clinical strains, MIC₅₀s and MIC₉₀s, defined as MICs at which 50 and 90%, respectively, of the isolates were inhibited, were determined. The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) was determined based on the lowest concentration of the extracts required to kill 99.9% of bacteria from the initial inoculum as determined by plating on agar.

2.4. Checkerboard Dilution Test

The synergistic combinations were investigated in the preliminary checkerboard method performed using the MRSA, MSSA, and VRSA of clinical isolate strains via MIC and MBC determination [26]. The fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) and fractional bactericidal concentration index (FBCI) are the sum of the FICs and FBCs of each of the drugs, which were defined as the MIC and MBC of each drug when used in combination divided by the MIC and MBC of each drug when used alone. The FIC and FBC index was calculated as follows: FIC = (MIC of drug A in combination/MIC of drug A alone) + (MIC of drug B in combination/MIC of drug B alone) and FBC = (MBC of drug A in combination/MBC of drug A alone) + (MBC of drug B in combination/MBC of drug B alone). FIC and FBC indices were interpreted as follows: the FIC index was interpreted as follows: synergy, <0.5; partial synergy, 0.5–0.75; additive effect, 0.76–1.0; indifference, >1.0–4.0; and antagonism, >4.0 [26].

2.5. Time-Kill Curves

The bactericidal activities of the drugs evaluated in this study were also evaluated using time-kill curves constructed using the isolated and reference strains. Cultures with an initial cell density of 1–5 × 10⁶ CFU/mL were exposed to the MIC of CT alone or CT (1/2 MIC) plus oxacillin or ampicillin or vancomycin (1/2 MIC). Viable counts were conducted at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, and 24 h by plating aliquots of the samples on agar and subsequent incubation for 24 hours at 37°C. All experiments were repeated several times and colony counts were conducted in duplicate, after which the means were determined.

3. Results and Discussion

Many researchers are studying natural products that could be used as antibiotics against MRSA and are employing novel dosing regimens and antimicrobials that would be advantageous for combating the therapeutic problems associated with S. aureus [10, 13, 14, 16, 27]. The main bioactive constituents of S. miltiorrhiza include water-soluble phenolic acids and lipophilic diterpenoid tanshinones [28–30]. Cryptotanshinone was isolated from dried S. miltiorrhiza roots and identified via comparison of their spectral data with the data reported in the literature [23, 24]. (CDCl₃) δ 7.64 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.48 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 4.86 (1H, t, J = 9.2 Hz), 4.36 (1H, dd, J = 6.0 and 6.0 Hz), 3.60 (1H, m), 3.21 (2H, br t), 1.69 (4H, m), 1.36 (3H, d, J = 6.4 Hz), 1.31 (6H, s). ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃) δ 29.67 (C-1), 19.08 (C-2), 37.82 (C-3), 34.86 (C-4), 143.70 (C-5), 132.56 (C-6), 122.50 (C-7), 128.42 (C-8), 126.27 (C-9), 152.37 (C-10), 184.27 (C-11), 175.72 (C-12), 118.30 (C-13), 170.75 (C-14), 81.46 (C-15), 34.62 (C-16), 18.85 (C-17), 31.94 (C-18), and 31.89 (C-19). Among the lipophilic diterpenoid tanshinones, cryptotanshinone, dihydrotanshinone I, tanshinone IIA, and tanshinone I exhibited strong antimicrobial activity against (Agrobacterium tumefaciens ATCC 11158, Escherichia coli ATCC 29425, Pseudomonas lachrymans ATCC 11921, Ralstonia solanacearum ATCC 11696, and Xanthomonas vesicatoria ATCC 11633) and three Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis ATCC 11562, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, and Staphylococcus haemolyticus ATCC 29970) [18]. Our results of the antibacterial activity showed that the CT exhibited inhibitory activities against isolates MSSA, MRSA, VRSA, and reference stains. The MICs and MBCs values of CT and antibiotics, ampicillin, oxacillin, and vancomycin against MSSA ATCC 25923 and MRSA ATCC 33591 and isolates MSSA 1-2, MRSA 1–16, and VRSA 1-2 are shown in Table 1. The MICs and MBCs values of CT against isolates MSSA 1-2 were in the range of 16 and 32 μg/mL and 64 and 128 μg/mL, isolates MRSA 1–16 in the range of 4–64 μg/mL and 8–128 μg/mL, isolates VRSA 1-2 in the range of 2 and 4 μg/mL and 4 and 16 μg/mL, and reference stains in range of 4 and 64 μg/mL and 16 and 256 μg/mL, respectively. The MICs/MBCs for ampicillin were determined to be either 8/16 or 1024/2048 μg/mL; for oxacillin, either 0.25/1 or 512/2048 μg/mL; for vancomycin, either 0.5/2 or 32/64 μg/mL against reference strains and MSSA 1-2, MRSA 1–16, and VRSA 1-2 isolates. The MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values of CT for reference strains were 0.5 and 4 μg/mL and 4 and 64 μg/mL, while for MSSA 1-2 and VRSA 1-2 isolates were 0.5–8 μg/mL and 2–32 μg/mL, and for MRSA 1–16 isolates were 0.5–8 μg/mL and 4–64 μg/mL, respectively (Table 1).

Evaluation of in vivo effectiveness of the antimicrobial combinations is necessary to generate data that can be extrapolated to the clinical situation as well as predicting relevant concentration of optimal dosing regimens for both agents of the combinations [31, 32]. Combination antibiotic therapy has been studied to promote the effective use of antibiotics in increasing in vivo activity of antibiotics, in preventing the spread of drug-resistant strains, and in minimizing toxicity [32, 33]. The combination of oxacillin and CT resulted in a reduction in the MICs/MBCs for isolates VRSA 1-2 and MSSA 1-2, with the MICs/MBCs of 2/16 or 8/128 μg/mL, for oxacillin becoming 0.125/0.125–0.25 μg/mL and reduced by ≥4-fold, evidencing a synergistic effect as defined by a FICI and FBCI of ≤0.5 (Table 2). The combination of oxacillin and CT resulted in a reduction against isolates MRSA 1–16, with the MICs/MBCs values of 0.5–16/2–32 μg/mL, for oxacillin becoming 1–128/4–256 μg/mL and reduced by ≥4-fold, evidencing a synergistic effect as defined by a FICI and FBCI of ≤0.5 except MRSA 4 and 16 of additive (FICI ≥ 0.5) and MRSA 1, 7, and 15 of additive (FBCI ≥ 0.5). The combination of ampicillin and CT resulted in a reduction in the MICs/MBCs for isolates VRSA 1-2 and MSSA 1-2, with the MICs/MBCs of 0.5/1 or 2/4 μg/mL and 4/8 or 8/16, for ampicillin becoming 32/128 or 64/256 μg/mL and 16/64 or 32/128 μg/mL and reduced by ≥4-fold, evidencing a synergistic effect as defined by a FICI and FBCI of ≤0.5 and in most of MRSA testedwere reduced by ≥4-fold evidencing a synergistic effect as defined by a FICI and FBCI of ≤0.5 except MRSA 6, 12, and 15 (FICI ≥ 0.5) and MRSA 6, 11, and 13 (FBCI ≥ 0.5), respectively (Table 3). The combination of vancomycin and CT resulted in a reduction against isolates MRSA 1–16, with the MICs/MBCs values of 1–16/2–32 μg/mL, for vancomycin becoming 0.125–0.5/0.5–2 μg/mL and reduced by ≥4-fold, evidencing a synergistic effect as defined by a FICI and FBCI of ≤ 0.5 except MRSA 6, 11, and 15 of additive (FICI ≥ 0.5) and MRSA 1 and 9 of additive (FBCI ≥ 0.5) and for isolates VRSA 1-2 and MSSA 1-2, with the MICs/MBCs of 0.5/1 or 1/4 μg/mL and 4/8 or 16/16, for vancomycin becoming 4/8 or 8/16 μg/mL and 0.25/2 or 0.25/1 μg/mL and reduced by ≥4-fold, evidencing a synergistic effect as defined by a FICI and FBCI of ≤0.5 except MSSA 1 and 2 of additive (FBCI ≥ 0.5) (Table 4).

Table 2: Synergistic effects of the cryptotanshinone with oxacillin in isolated MRSA, VRSA, MSSA, and some of reference bacteria.

Samples
Agent
MIC/MBC (μg/mL)
FIC/FBC
FICI/FBCI²
Outcome

Alone
Combination¹

MSSA ATCC 25923³
Cryptotanshinone
64/256
8/32
0.125/0.125
0.375/0.375
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
0.25/1
0.0625/0.25
0.25/0.25

MRSA ATCC 33591⁴
Cryptotanshinone
4/16
1/4
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
8/16
2/4
0.25/0.25

VRSA 3A063⁵
Cryptotanshinone
2/4
0.5/2
0.25/0.5
0.375/0.375
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
512/1024
64/128
0.125/0.125

VRSA 3A066⁶
Cryptotanshinone
4/16
1/4
0.25/0.25
0.375/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
512/1024
64/256
0.125/0.25

MSSA 1⁷
Cryptotanshinone
16/64
2/8
0.125/0.125
0.375/0.25
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
0.5/1
0.125/0.125
0.25/0.125

MSSA 2
Cryptotanshinone
32/128
16/32
0.5/0.25
0.375/0.375
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
1/2
0.125/0.25
0.125/0.125

MRSA 1⁸
Cryptotanshinone
16/32
4/16
0.25/0.5
0.5/0.75
Synergistic/additive

Oxacillin
128/256
32/64
0.25/0.25

MRSA 2
Cryptotanshinone
64/128
16/16
0.25/0.125
0.5/0.375
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
8/32
2/8
0.25/0.25

MRSA 3
Cryptotanshinone
4/16
0.5/4
0.125/0.25
0.375/0.375
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
128/512
32/64
0.25/0.125

MRSA 4
Cryptotanshinone
4/8
2/2
0.5/0.25
0.75/0.375
Additive/synergistic

Oxacillin
512/2048
128/256
0.25/0.125

MRSA 5
Cryptotanshinone
64/128
16/32
0.25/0.25
0.375/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
512/1024
64/256
0.125/0.25

MRSA 6
Cryptotanshinone
4/16
1/4
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
64/256
16/64
0.25/0.25

MRSA 7
Cryptotanshinone
8/16
2/8
0.25/0.5
0.375/0.75
Synergistic/additive

Oxacillin
512/1024
64/256
0.125/0.25

MRSA 8
Cryptotanshinone
32/64
8/32
0.25/0.5
0.5/0.625
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
512/2048
128/256
0.25/0.125

MRSA 9
Cryptotanshinone
8/16
2/4
0.25/0.25
0.375/0.3125
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
512/1024
64/64
0.125/0.0625

MRSA 10
Cryptotanshinone
16/64
2/8
0.125/0.125
0.3125/0.25
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
512/1024
32/128
0.0625/0.125

MRSA 11
Cryptotanshinone
8/32
1/4
0.125/0.125
0.375/0.375
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
64/128
16/64
0.25/0.5

MRSA 12
Cryptotanshinone
4/8
1/2
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
128/256
32/64
0.25/0.25

MRSA 13
Cryptotanshinone
32/128
8/32
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.375
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
32/128
8/8
0.25/0.125

MRSA 14
Cryptotanshinone
8/16
2/4
0.25/0.25
0.375/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Oxacillin
8/16
1/4
0.125/0.25

MRSA 15
Cryptotanshinone
4/16
1/8
0.25/0.5
0.5/0.75
Synergistic/additive

Oxacillin
128/256
32/64
0.25/0.25

MRSA 16
Cryptotanshinone
8/16
2/4
0.25/0.25
0.75/0.375
Additive/synergistic

Oxacillin
128/512
64/64
0.5/0.125

 ¹The MIC and MBC of cryptotanshinone with oxacillin.

2The FIC index.

3MSSA (ATCC 25923): reference strain methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus.

4MRSA (ATCC 33591): reference strain methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

5VRSA 3A063: vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically.

6VRSA 3A066: vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically.

7MSSA (1-2): methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically.

8MRSA (1–16): methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically.

Table 3: Synergistic effects of cryptotanshinone with ampicillin in isolated MRSA, VRSA, MSSA, and some of reference bacteria.

Samples
Agent
MIC/MBC (μg/mL)
FIC/FBC
FICI/FBCI²
Outcome

Alone
Combination¹

MSSA ATCC 25923³
Cryptotanshinone
64/256
16/64
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.75
Synergistic/additive

Ampicillin
8/16
2/8
0.25/0.5

MRSA ATCC 33591⁴
Cryptotanshinone
4/16
1/4
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Ampicillin
512/2048
128/512
0.25/0.25

VRSA 3A063⁵
Cryptotanshinone
2/4
0.5/2
0.25/0.5
0.5/0.375
Synergistic/synergistic

Ampicillin
512/2048
128/256
0.25/0.125

VRSA 3A066⁶
Cryptotanshinone
4/16
1/4
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Ampicillin
128/256
32/64
0.25/0.25

MSSA 1⁷
Cryptotanshinone
16/64
4/8
0.25/0.125
0.5/0.375
Synergistic/synergistic

Ampicillin
64/128
16/32
0.25/0.25

MSSA 2
Cryptotanshinone
32/128
8/16
0.25/0.125
0.5/0.375
Synergistic/synergistic

Ampicillin
256/512
64/128
0.25/0.25

MRSA 1⁸
Cryptotanshinone
16/32
4/8
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Ampicillin
128/256
32/64
0.25/0.25

MRSA 2
Cryptotanshinone
64/128
16/32
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Ampicillin
64/256
16/64
0.25/0.25

MRSA 3
Cryptotanshinone
4/16
1/2
0.25/0.125
0.5/0.25
Synergistic/synergistic

Ampicillin
128/512
32/64
0.25/0.125

MRSA 4
Cryptotanshinone
4/8
1/2
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Ampicillin
128/256
32/64
0.25/0.25

MRSA 5
Cryptotanshinone
64/128
16/32
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Ampicillin
256/512
64/128
0.25/0.25

MRSA 6
Cryptotanshinone
4/16
1/2
0.25/0.125
0.75/0.625
Additive/additive

Ampicillin
64/128
32/64
0.5/0.5

MRSA 7
Cryptotanshinone
8/16
2/4
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Ampicillin
128/256
32/64
0.25/0.25

MRSA 8
Cryptotanshinone
32/64
8/16
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.375
Synergistic/synergistic

Ampicillin
32/64
8/8
0.25/0.125

MRSA 9
Cryptotanshinone
8/16
2/4
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Ampicillin
64/128
16/32
0.25/0.25

MRSA 10
Cryptotanshinone
16/64
2/8
0.125/0.125
0.375/0.375
Synergistic/synergistic

Ampicillin
128/256
32/64
0.25/0.25

MRSA 11
Cryptotanshinone
8/32
2/8
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.75
Synergistic/additive

Ampicillin
64/128
16/64
0.25/0.5

MRSA 12
Cryptotanshinone
4/8
1/2
0.25/0.25
0.75/0.5
Additive/synergistic

Ampicillin
128/256
64/64
0.5/0.25

MRSA 13
Cryptotanshinone
32/128
8/32
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.75
Synergistic/additive

Ampicillin
128/256
32/128
0.25/0.5

MRSA 14
Cryptotanshinone
8/16
2/4
0.25/0.25
0.375/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Ampicillin
64/128
8/32
0.125/0.25

MRSA 15
Cryptotanshinone
4/16
2/4
0.5/0.25
0.75/0.5
Additive/synergistic

Ampicillin
64/128
16/32
0.25/0.25

MRSA 16
Cryptotanshinone
8/16
2/4
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.375
Synergistic/synergistic

Ampicillin
128/512
32/64
0.25/0.125

 ¹The MIC and MBC of cryptotanshinone with ampicillin.

2The FIC index.

3MSSA (ATCC 25923): reference strain methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus.

4MRSA (ATCC 33591): reference strain methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

5VRSA 3A063: vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically.

6VRSA 3A066: vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically.

7MSSA (1-2): methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically.

8MRSA (1–16): methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically.

Table 4: Synergistic effects of cryptotanshinone with vancomycin in isolated MRSA, VRSA, MSSA, and some of reference bacteria.

Samples
Agent
MIC/MBC (μg/mL)
FIC/FBC
FICI/FBCI²
Outcome

Alone
Combination¹

MSSA ATCC 25923³
Cryptotanshinone
64/256
16/64
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Vancomycin
0.5/2
0.125/0.5
0.25/0.25

MRSA ATCC 33591⁴
Cryptotanshinone
4/16
1/4
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Vancomycin
1/4
0.25/1
0.25/0.25

VRSA 3A063⁵
Cryptotanshinone
2/4
0.5/1
0.125/0.25
0.375/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Vancomycin
16/32
4/8
0.25/0.25

VRSA 3A066⁶
Cryptotanshinone
4/16
1/4
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Vancomycin
32/64
8/16
0.25/0.25

MSSA 1⁷
Cryptotanshinone
16/64
4/16
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.75
Synergistic/additive

Vancomycin
1/4
0.25/2
0.25/0.5

MSSA 2
Cryptotanshinone
32/128
8/16
0.25/0.125
0.5/0.625
Synergistic/additive

Vancomycin
1/2
0.25/1
0.25/0.5

MRSA 1⁸
Cryptotanshinone
16/32
4/8
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Vancomycin
1/2
0.25/0.5
0.25/0.25

MRSA 2
Cryptotanshinone
64/128
16/32
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.75
Synergistic/additive

Vancomycin
2/4
0.5/2
0.25/0.5

MRSA 3
Cryptotanshinone
4/16
1/4
0.25/0.25
0.375/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Vancomycin
2/4
0.25/1
0.125/0.25

MRSA 4
Cryptotanshinone
4/8
1/2
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Vancomycin
1/2
0.25/0.5
0.25/0.25

MRSA 5
Cryptotanshinone
64/128
16/32
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Vancomycin
1/2
0.25/0.5
0.25/0.25

MRSA 6
Cryptotanshinone
4/16
2/4
0.5/0.25
0.75/0.5
Additive/synergistic

Vancomycin
1/2
0.25/0.5
0.25/0.25

MRSA 7
Cryptotanshinone
8/16
2/4
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.375
Synergistic/synergistic

Vancomycin
1/4
0.25/0.5
0.25/0.125

MRSA 8
Cryptotanshinone
32/64
8/16
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.375
Synergistic/synergistic

Vancomycin
1/4
0.25/0.5
0.25/0.125

MRSA 9
Cryptotanshinone
8/16
2/4
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Vancomycin
1/2
0.25/0.5
0.25/0.25

MRSA 10
Cryptotanshinone
16/64
4/8
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.75
Synergistic/additive

Vancomycin
1/2
0.25/1
0.25/0.5

MRSA 11
Cryptotanshinone
8/32
2/8
0.25/0.25
0.75/0.5
Additive/synergistic

Vancomycin
1/2
0.5/0.5
0.5/0.25

MRSA 12
Cryptotanshinone
4/8
1/2
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.375
Synergistic/synergistic

Vancomycin
1/4
0.25/0.5
0.25/0.125

MRSA 13
Cryptotanshinone
32/128
16/32
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Vancomycin
1/2
0.25/0.5
0.25/0.25

MRSA 14
Cryptotanshinone
8/16
2/4
0.25/0.25
0.5/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Vancomycin
1/4
0.25/1
0.25/0.25

MRSA 15
Cryptotanshinone
4/16
2/4
0.5/0.25
0.75/0.375
Additive/synergistic

Vancomycin
1/4
0.25/0.5
0.25/0.125

MRSA 16
Cryptotanshinone
8/16
2/4
0.25/0.25
0.375/0.5
Synergistic/synergistic

Vancomycin
1/2
0.125/0.5
0.125/0.25

 ¹The MIC and MBC of cryptotanshinone with vancomycin.

2 The FIC index.

3MSSA (ATCC 25923): reference strain methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus.

4MRSA (ATCC 33591): reference strain methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

5VRSA 3A063: vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically.

6VRSA 3A066: vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically.

7MSSA (1-2): methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically.

8MRSA (1–16): methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated clinically.

The effects of CT administered in combination with oxacillin and/or ampicillin and/or vancomycin against standard (MSSA and MRSA) and clinical isolates of MSSA (1, 2), VRSA (1,2), and MRSA (MRSA 1–16) were confirmed by time-kill curve experiments (Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8). Cultures of each strain of bacteria with a cell density of 10⁶ CFU/mL were exposed to the MIC of CT and antibiotics alone or CT (1/2 MIC) with oxacillin (1/2 MIC), ampicillin (1/2 MIC), or vancomycin (1/2 MIC). We observed that 30 minutes of CT treatment with ampicillin, oxacillin, or vancomycin resulted in an increased rate of killing as compared to that observed with CT (MIC) alone. A profound bactericidal effect was exerted when a combination of drugs was utilized. The growth of the tested bacteria was completely attenuated after 2–5 h of treatment with the 1/2 MIC of CT, regardless of whether it was administered alone or with oxacillin (1/2 MIC), ampicillin (1/2 MIC), or vancomycin (1/2 MIC) (Figures 1–8).

Figure 1: Time-kill curves of MIC or 1/2 MIC of cryptotanshinone (CT), ampicillin (AMP), oxacillin (OXA), and vancomycin (VAN) alone and its combination with MIC₅₀ of AMP or OXA, and VAN against VRSA 1 isolates and reference stains, MSSA ATCC 25923 and MRSA ATCC 33591. Bacteria were incubated with MIC of CT (●), AMP, OXA, and VAN, and 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of AMP (○), 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of OXA (), and 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of VAN (∇) over time. CFU: colony-forming units.

Figure 2: Time-kill curves of MIC or 1/2 MIC of cryptotanshinone (CT), ampicillin (AMP), oxacillin (OXA), and vancomycin (VAN) alone and its combination with 1/2 MIC of AMP or OXA, and VAN against VRSA 2, MSSA 1, and MSSA 2 isolates. Bacteria were incubated with MIC of CT (●), AMP, OXA, and VAN, and 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of AMP (○), 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of OXA (), and 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of VAN (∇) over time. CFU: colony-forming units.

Figure 3: Time-kill curves of MIC or 1/2 MIC of cryptotanshinone (CT), ampicillin (AMP), oxacillin (OXA), and vancomycin (VAN) alone and its combination with 1/2 MIC of AMP or OXA, and VAN against MRSA 1, 2, and 3 isolates. Bacteria were incubated with MIC of CT (●), AMP, OXA, and VAN, and 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of AMP (○), 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of OXA (), and 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of VAN (∇) over time. CFU: colony-forming units.

Figure 4: Time-kill curves of MIC or 1/2 MIC of cryptotanshinone (CT), ampicillin (AMP), oxacillin (OXA), and vancomycin (VAN) alone and its combination with 1/2 MIC of AMP or OXA, and VAN against MRSA 4, 5, and 6 isolates. Bacteria were incubated with MIC of CT (●), AMP (○), OXA (), and VAN (∇), and 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of AMP (●), 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of OXA (○), and 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of VAN () over time. CFU: colony-forming units.

Figure 5: Time-kill curves of MIC or 1/2 MIC of cryptotanshinone (CT), ampicillin (AMP), oxacillin (OXA), and vancomycin (VAN) alone and its combination with 1/2 MIC of AMP or OXA, and VAN against MRSA 7, 8, and 9 isolates. Bacteria were incubated with MIC of CT (●), AMP (○), OXA (), and VAN (∇), and 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of AMP (●), 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of OXA (○), and 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of VAN () over time. CFU: colony-forming units.

Figure 6: Time-kill curves of MIC or 1/2 MIC of cryptotanshinone (CT), ampicillin (AMP), oxacillin (OXA), and vancomycin (VAN) alone and its combination with 1/2 MIC of AMP or OXA, and VAN against MRSA 10, 11, and 12 isolates. Bacteria were incubated with MIC of CT (●), AMP (○), OXA (), and VAN (∇), and 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of AMP (●), 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of OXA (○), and 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of VAN () over time. CFU: colony-forming units.

Figure 7: Time-kill curves of MIC or 1/2 MIC of cryptotanshinone (CT), ampicillin (AMP), oxacillin (OXA), and vancomycin (VAN) alone and its combination with 1/2 MIC of AMP or OXA, and VAN against MRSA 13, 14, and 15 isolates. Bacteria were incubated with MIC of CT (●), AMP (○), OXA (), and VAN (∇), and 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of AMP (●), 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of OXA (○), and 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of VAN () over time. CFU: colony-forming units.

Figure 8: Time-kill curves of MIC or 1/2 MIC of cryptotanshinone (CT), ampicillin (AMP), oxacillin (OXA), and vancomycin (VAN) alone and its combination with 1/2 MIC of AMP or OXA, and VAN against MRSA 16 isolate. Bacteria were incubated with MIC of CT (●), AMP (○), OXA (), and VAN (∇), and 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of AMP (●), 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of OXA (○), and 1/2 MIC of CT + 1/2 MIC of VAN () over time. CFU: colony-forming units.

It has been reported that some plant-derived compounds can improve the in vitro activity of some cell-wall inhibiting antibiotics by directly attacking the same target site, that is, peptidoglycan [7, 9, 34]. CT exhibits antimicrobial activity against a broad range of Gram-positive bacteria, including S. aureus, and Gram-negative bacteria as well as other microorganisms [21, 22]. Despite the pharmacological activities, potential risks regarding combination use of S. miltiorrhiza and drugs have been observed [28, 35, 36]. Scientific findings concluded S. miltiorrhiza fraction, and its components (cryptotanshinone and dihydrotanshinone I) showed antibacterial activity against a broad range of bacteria, including the broad range of Gram-positive bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria, and superoxide radicals are considered important in the antibacterial actions of the agents [18]. The Gram-positive bacteria-specific properties of CT are caused by the inhibition of RNA and protein synthesis, rather than by attacking the bacterial membrane [21, 22].

In conclusion, CT of S. miltiorrhiza is expected to be recognized as natural sources for the development of new functional drugs against multiresistant S. aureus, MRSA and VRSA.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have declared no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Jeong-Dan Cha and Jeong-Ho Lee contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by Dong-eui University Grant (2011AA106).

References

G. R. Corey, “Staphylococcus aureusbloodstream infections: definitions and treatment,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. S254–S259, 2009.

C. A. Petti and V. G. Fowler Jr., “Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis,” Cardiology Clinics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 219–233, 2003.

A. Malm, A. Biernasiuk, R. Łoś et al., “Slime production and cell surface hydrophobicity of nasopharyngeal and skin staphylococci isolated from healthy people,” Polish Journal of Microbiology, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 117–121, 2005.

S. Defres, C. Marwick, and D. Nathwani, “MRSA as a cause of lung infection including airway infection, community-acquired pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1470–1476, 2009.

D. P. Levine, “Vancomycin: understanding its past and preserving its future,” Southern Medical Journal, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 284–291, 2008.

Z. Moravvej, F. Estaji, E. Askari, K. Solhjou, M. N. Nasab, and S. Saadat, “Update on the global number of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) strains,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 370–371, 2013.

C.-H. Huang and Y.-H. Chen, “The detection and clinical impact of vancomycin MIC among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia,” Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 315–316, 2013.

D. I. Hsu, L. K. Hidayat, R. Quist et al., “Comparison of method-specific vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration values and their predictability for treatment outcome of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 378–385, 2008.

H. C. Maltezou and H. Giamarellou, “Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 87–96, 2006.

F. Aqil, M. S. A. Khan, M. Owais, and I. Ahmad, “Effect of certain bioactive plant extracts on clinical isolates of β-lactamase producing methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Basic Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 106–114, 2005.

J. N. Eloff, “Which extractant should be used for the screening and isolation of antimicrobial components from plants?” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1998.

J. Parekh and S. V. Chanda, “In vitro antimicrobial activity and phytochemical analysis of some Indian medicinal plants,” Turkish Journal of Biology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 53–58, 2007.

T. Hatano, Y. Shintani, Y. Aga, S. Shiota, T. Tsuchiya, and T. Yoshida, “Phenolic constituents of licorice. VIII. Structures of glicophenone and glicoisoflavanone, and effects of licorice phenolics on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1286–1292, 2000.

T. Fukai, A. Marumo, K. Kaitou, T. Kanda, S. Terada, and T. Nomura, “Antimicrobial activity of licorice flavonoids against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Fitoterapia, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 536–539, 2002.

E. Tripoli, M. L. Guardia, S. Giammanco, D. D. Majo, and M. Giammanco, “Citrus flavonoids: molecular structure, biological activity and nutritional properties: a review,” Food Chemistry, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 466–479, 2007.

G. B. Mahady, “Medicinal plants for the prevention and treatment of bacterial infections,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 11, no. 19, pp. 2405–2427, 2005.

J. Cao, Y.-J. Wei, L.-W. Qi et al., “Determination of fifteen bioactive components in Radix et Rhizoma Salviae Miltiorrhizae by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and mass spectrometric detection,” Biomedical Chromatography, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 164–172, 2008.

D.-S. Lee, S.-H. Lee, J.-G. Noh, and S.-D. Hong, “Antibacterial activities of cryptotanshinone and dihydrotanshinone I from a medicinal herb, Salvia miltiorrhiza bunge,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 2236–2239, 1999.

Y.-M. Ahn, S. K. Kim, S.-H. Lee et al., “Renoprotective effect of Tanshinone IIA, an active component of Salvia miltiorrhiza, on rats with chronic kidney disease,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1886–1892, 2010.

W. Chen, L. Liu, Y. Luo et al., “Cryptotanshinone activates p38/JNK and inhibits Erk1/2 leading to caspase-independent cell death in tumor cells,” Cancer Prevention Research, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 778–787, 2012.

H. Feng, H. Xiang, J. Zhang et al., “Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of the response of Staphylococcus aureus to cryptotanshinone,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2009, Article ID 617509, 8 pages, 2009.

J.-W. Lee, Y.-J. Ji, S.-O. Lee, and I.-S. Lee, “Effect of Saliva miltiorrhiza Bunge on antimicrobial activity and resistant gene regulation against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA),” Journal of Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 350–357, 2007.

M. Gu, G. Zhang, Z. Su, and F. Ouyang, “Identification of major active constituents in the fingerprint of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge developed by high-speed counter-current chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1041, no. 1-2, pp. 239–243, 2004.

E. J. Park, H. Y. Ji, N. J. Kim et al., “Simultaneous determination of tanshinone I, dihydrotanshinone I, tanshinone IIA and cryptotanshinone in rat plasma by liquid chromatography—tandem mass spectrometry: application to a pharmacokinetic study of a standardized fraction of Salvia miltiorrhiza, PF2401-SF,” Biomedical Chromatography, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 548–555, 2008.

R. D. Wojtyczka, A. Dziedzic, D. Idzik et al., “Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates to propolis extract alone or in combination with antimicrobial drugs,” Molecules, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 9623–9640, 2013.

W. Seesom, A. Jaratrungtawee, S. Suksumran, C. Mekseepralard, P. Ratananukul, and W. Sukhumsirichart, “Antileptospiral activity of xanthones from Garcinia mangostana and synergy of gamma-mangostin with penicillin G.,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 13, article 1, 2013.

A. Ribeiro, A. Z. Coronado, M. C. Silva-Carvalho et al., “Detection and characterization of international community-acquired infections by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in Rio de Janeiro and Porto Alegre cities causing both community- and hospital-associated diseases,” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 339–345, 2007.

D. Yuan, Y.-N. Pan, W.-W. Fu, T. Makino, and Y. Kano, “Quantitative analysis of the marker compounds in Salvia miltiorrihiza root and its phytomedicinal preparations,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 508–514, 2005.

Y.-G. Li, L. Song, M. Liu, Z.-B. Zhi-Bi-Hu, and Z.-T. Wang, “Advancement in analysis of Salviae miltiorrhizae Radix et Rhizoma (Danshen),” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1216, no. 11, pp. 1941–1953, 2009.

G. Zeng, H. Xiao, J. Liu, and X. Liang, “Identification of phenolic constituents in Radix Salvia miltiorrhizae by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry,” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 499–506, 2006.

C. Jacqueline, J. Caillon, V. Le Mabecque et al., “In vitro activity of linezolid alone and in combination with gentamicin, vancomycin or rifampicin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by time-kill curve methods,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 857–864, 2003.

O. Aiyegoro, A. Adewusi, S. Oyedemi, D. Akinpelu, and A. Okoh, “Interactions of antibiotics and methanolic crude extracts of Afzelia Africana (Smith.) against drug resistance bacterial isolates,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 4477–4487, 2011.

J.-Y. Lee, S. O. Won, S. K. Kwan et al., “Synergy of arbekacin-based combinations against vancomycin hetero-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 188–192, 2006.

M. N. Alekshun and S. B. Levy, “Molecular mechanisms of antibacterial multidrug resistance,” Cell, vol. 128, no. 6, pp. 1037–1050, 2007.

T.-H. Chen, Y.-T. Hsu, C.-H. Chen, S.-H. Kao, and H.-M. Lee, “Tanshinone IIA from Salvia miltiorrhiza induces heme oxygenase-1 expression and inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced nitric oxide expression in RAW 264.7 cells,” Mitochondrion, vol. 7, no. 1-2, pp. 101–105, 2007.

J. D. Adams, R. Wang, J. Yang, and E. J. Lien, “Preclinical and clinical examinations of Salvia miltiorrhiza and its tanshinones in ischemic conditions,” Chinese Medicine, vol. 1, article 3, 2006.